@autobe/agent 0.21.0 → 0.22.1

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestImportStatements.js

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+"use strict";
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
+exports.getTestImportStatements = void 0;
+const utils_1 = require("@autobe/utils");
+const getTestImportStatements = (document) => {
+    const typeReferences = Array.from(new Set(Object.keys(document.components.schemas).map((key) => key.split(".")[0]))).sort();
+    return utils_1.StringUtil.trim `
+    import { ArrayUtil, RandomGenerator, TestValidator } from "@nestia/e2e";
+    import { IConnection } from "@nestia/fetcher";
+    import typia, { tags } from "typia";
+    
+    import api from "@ORGANIZATION/PROJECT-api";
+    ${typeReferences
+        .map((ref) => `import type { ${ref} } from "@ORGANIZATION/PROJECT-api/lib/structures/${ref}";`)
+        .join("\n")}
+  `;
+};
+exports.getTestImportStatements = getTestImportStatements;
+//# sourceMappingURL=getTestImportStatements.js.map

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestImportStatements.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"getTestImportStatements.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestImportStatements.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;;AACA,yCAA2C;AAEpC,MAAM,uBAAuB,GAAG,CACrC,QAAiC,EACzB,EAAE;IACV,MAAM,cAAc,GAAa,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CACzC,IAAI,GAAG,CACL,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAE,CAAC,CAC1E,CACF,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;IACT,OAAO,kBAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAA;;;;;;MAMlB,cAAc;SACb,GAAG,CACF,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,EAAE,CACN,iBAAiB,GAAG,qDAAqD,GAAG,IAAI,CACnF;SACA,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;GACd,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC,CAAC;AArBW,QAAA,uBAAuB,2BAqBlC"}

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestScenarioArtifacts.d.ts

@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ import { AutoBeTestScenario } from "@autobe/interface";
 import { ILlmSchema } from "@samchon/openapi";
 import { AutoBeContext } from "../../../context/AutoBeContext";
 import { IAutoBeTestScenarioArtifacts } from "../structures/IAutoBeTestScenarioArtifacts";
-export declare function getTestScenarioArtifacts<Model extends ILlmSchema.Model>(ctx: AutoBeContext<Model>, scenario: Pick<AutoBeTestScenario, "endpoint" | "dependencies">): Promise<IAutoBeTestScenarioArtifacts>;
+export declare function getTestScenarioArtifacts<Model extends ILlmSchema.Model>(ctx: AutoBeContext<Model>, scenario: Pick<AutoBeTestScenario, "endpoint" | "dependencies" | "functionName">): Promise<IAutoBeTestScenarioArtifacts>;

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestScenarioArtifacts.js

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ var __awaiter = (this && this.__awaiter) || function (thisArg, _arguments, P, ge
 Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
 exports.getTestScenarioArtifacts = getTestScenarioArtifacts;
 const openapi_1 = require("@samchon/openapi");
+const getTestTemplateCode_1 = require("./getTestTemplateCode");
 function getTestScenarioArtifacts(ctx, scenario) {
     return __awaiter(this, void 0, void 0, function* () {
         const compiler = yield ctx.compiler();
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ function getTestScenarioArtifacts(ctx, scenario) {
             sdk: filter("src/api", "src/api/structures"),
             dto: filter("src/api/structures"),
             e2e: filter("test/features"),
+            template: (0, getTestTemplateCode_1.getTestTemplateCode)(scenario, document),
         };
     });
 }

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestScenarioArtifacts.js.map

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"getTestScenarioArtifacts.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestScenarioArtifacts.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;;;;;;;;;;AAUA,4DA4BC;AAjCD,8CAAkE;AAKlE,SAAsB,wBAAwB,CAC5C,GAAyB,EACzB,QAA+D;;QAE/D,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAoB,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC;QACvD,MAAM,QAAQ,GAA4B,cAAc,CACtD,QAAQ,EACR,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,SAAU,CAAC,QAAQ,CAChC,CAAC;QACF,MAAM,OAAO,GAAuB,MAAM,CAAC,OAAO,CAChD,MAAM,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CACzC,CAAC;QACF,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,MAAc,EAAE,OAAgB,EAAE,EAAE;YAClD,MAAM,MAAM,GAAuB,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,CAC/C,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,KAAK,IAAI,CAC3C,CAAC;YACF,OAAO,MAAM,CAAC,WAAW,CACvB,OAAO;gBACL,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,KAAK,KAAK,CAAC;gBAC7D,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CACX,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC,CAAC;QACF,OAAO;YACL,QAAQ;YACR,GAAG,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,oBAAoB,CAAC;YAC5C,GAAG,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,oBAAoB,CAAC;YACjC,GAAG,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,eAAe,CAAC;SAC7B,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC;CAAA;AAED,SAAS,cAAc,CACrB,QAA+D,EAC/D,QAAiC;IAEjC,MAAM,UAAU,GAA+B,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,MAAM,CACvE,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CACL,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM;QACrC,QAAQ,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;QACrC,QAAQ,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,IAAI,CACxB,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CACL,EAAE,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,CACnE,CACJ,CAAC;IACF,MAAM,UAAU,GAA8B;QAC5C,aAAa,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,aAAa;QAChD,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE;KACZ,CAAC;IACF,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,CAAC,QAAgB,EAAE,EAAE;QACjC,4BAAkB,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC;YACvB,UAAU,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU;YAC/B,MAAM,EAAE,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,wBAAwB,QAAQ,EAAE,EAAE;YACpD,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE;gBACb,IAAI,4BAAkB,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;oBACtC,MAAM,GAAG,GAAW,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAG,CAAC;oBAC7C,UAAU,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;gBAC7D,CAAC;YACH,CAAC;SACF,CAAC,CAAC;IACL,CAAC,CAAC;IACF,KAAK,MAAM,EAAE,IAAI,UAAU,EAAE,CAAC;QAC5B,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW;YAAE,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;QACnD,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,YAAY;YAAE,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;IACvD,CAAC;IACD,OAAO;QACL,UAAU;QACV,UAAU;KACX,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC"}
+{"version":3,"file":"getTestScenarioArtifacts.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestScenarioArtifacts.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;;;;;;;;;;AAWA,4DAgCC;AAtCD,8CAAkE;AAIlE,+DAA4D;AAE5D,SAAsB,wBAAwB,CAC5C,GAAyB,EACzB,QAGC;;QAED,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAoB,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC;QACvD,MAAM,QAAQ,GAA4B,cAAc,CACtD,QAAQ,EACR,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,SAAU,CAAC,QAAQ,CAChC,CAAC;QACF,MAAM,OAAO,GAAuB,MAAM,CAAC,OAAO,CAChD,MAAM,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CACzC,CAAC;QACF,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,MAAc,EAAE,OAAgB,EAAE,EAAE;YAClD,MAAM,MAAM,GAAuB,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,CAC/C,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,KAAK,IAAI,CAC3C,CAAC;YACF,OAAO,MAAM,CAAC,WAAW,CACvB,OAAO;gBACL,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,KAAK,KAAK,CAAC;gBAC7D,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CACX,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC,CAAC;QACF,OAAO;YACL,QAAQ;YACR,GAAG,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,oBAAoB,CAAC;YAC5C,GAAG,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,oBAAoB,CAAC;YACjC,GAAG,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,eAAe,CAAC;YAC5B,QAAQ,EAAE,IAAA,yCAAmB,EAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC;SAClD,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC;CAAA;AAED,SAAS,cAAc,CACrB,QAA+D,EAC/D,QAAiC;IAEjC,MAAM,UAAU,GAA+B,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,MAAM,CACvE,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CACL,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM;QACrC,QAAQ,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;QACrC,QAAQ,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,IAAI,CACxB,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CACL,EAAE,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,CACnE,CACJ,CAAC;IACF,MAAM,UAAU,GAA8B;QAC5C,aAAa,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,aAAa;QAChD,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE;KACZ,CAAC;IACF,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,CAAC,QAAgB,EAAE,EAAE;QACjC,4BAAkB,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC;YACvB,UAAU,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU;YAC/B,MAAM,EAAE,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,wBAAwB,QAAQ,EAAE,EAAE;YACpD,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE;gBACb,IAAI,4BAAkB,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;oBACtC,MAAM,GAAG,GAAW,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAG,CAAC;oBAC7C,UAAU,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;gBAC7D,CAAC;YACH,CAAC;SACF,CAAC,CAAC;IACL,CAAC,CAAC;IACF,KAAK,MAAM,EAAE,IAAI,UAAU,EAAE,CAAC;QAC5B,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW;YAAE,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;QACnD,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,YAAY;YAAE,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;IACvD,CAAC;IACD,OAAO;QACL,UAAU;QACV,UAAU;KACX,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC"}

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestTemplateCode.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+import { AutoBeOpenApi, AutoBeTestScenario } from "@autobe/interface";
+export declare const getTestTemplateCode: (scenario: Pick<AutoBeTestScenario, "endpoint" | "dependencies" | "functionName">, document: AutoBeOpenApi.IDocument) => string;

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestTemplateCode.js

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+"use strict";
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
+exports.getTestTemplateCode = void 0;
+const utils_1 = require("@autobe/utils");
+const getTestImportStatements_1 = require("./getTestImportStatements");
+const getTestTemplateCode = (scenario, document) => {
+    return utils_1.StringUtil.trim `
+    ${(0, getTestImportStatements_1.getTestImportStatements)(document)}
+
+    /**
+     * <SCENARIO DESCRIPTION HERE>
+     */
+    export async function ${scenario.functionName}(
+      connection: api.IConnection,
+    ) {
+      // <E2E TEST CODE HERE>
+    }
+  `;
+};
+exports.getTestTemplateCode = getTestTemplateCode;
+//# sourceMappingURL=getTestTemplateCode.js.map

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestTemplateCode.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"getTestTemplateCode.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/test/compile/getTestTemplateCode.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;;AACA,yCAA2C;AAE3C,uEAAoE;AAE7D,MAAM,mBAAmB,GAAG,CACjC,QAGC,EACD,QAAiC,EACzB,EAAE;IACV,OAAO,kBAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAA;MAClB,IAAA,iDAAuB,EAAC,QAAQ,CAAC;;;;;4BAKX,QAAQ,CAAC,YAAY;;;;;GAK9C,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC,CAAC;AAnBW,QAAA,mBAAmB,uBAmB9B"}

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/histories/transformTestCorrectHistories.d.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import { IAgenticaHistoryJson } from "@agentica/core";
-import { IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult } from "@autobe/interface";
 import { ILlmSchema } from "@samchon/openapi";
 import { AutoBeContext } from "../../../context/AutoBeContext";
 import { IAutoBeTestFunction } from "../structures/IAutoBeTestFunction";
-export declare const transformTestCorrectHistories: <Model extends ILlmSchema.Model>(ctx: AutoBeContext<Model>, func: IAutoBeTestFunction, failure: IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult.IFailure) => Promise<Array<IAgenticaHistoryJson.IAssistantMessage | IAgenticaHistoryJson.ISystemMessage>>;
+import { IAutoBeTestFunctionFailure } from "../structures/IAutoBeTestFunctionFailure";
+export declare const transformTestCorrectHistories: <Model extends ILlmSchema.Model>(ctx: AutoBeContext<Model>, func: IAutoBeTestFunction, failures: IAutoBeTestFunctionFailure[]) => Promise<Array<IAgenticaHistoryJson.IAssistantMessage | IAgenticaHistoryJson.ISystemMessage>>;

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/histories/transformTestCorrectHistories.js

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ exports.transformTestCorrectHistories = void 0;
 const utils_1 = require("@autobe/utils");
 const uuid_1 = require("uuid");
 const transformTestWriteHistories_1 = require("./transformTestWriteHistories");
-const transformTestCorrectHistories = (ctx, func, failure) => __awaiter(void 0, void 0, void 0, function* () {
+const transformTestCorrectHistories = (ctx, func, failures) => __awaiter(void 0, void 0, void 0, function* () {
     const previous = yield (0, transformTestWriteHistories_1.transformTestWriteHistories)(ctx, func.scenario, func.artifacts);
     return [
         ...previous.slice(0, -1),
@@ -21,30 +21,29 @@ const transformTestCorrectHistories = (ctx, func, failure) => __awaiter(void 0,
             id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
             type: "systemMessage",
-            text: "# E2E Test Code Compilation Error Fix System Prompt\n\n## 1. Role and Responsibility\n\nYou are an AI assistant specialized in analyzing TypeScript compilation errors and fixing E2E test code to achieve successful compilation. Your primary task is to analyze compilation diagnostics, understand the root causes of errors, and generate corrected code that compiles without errors while maintaining the original test functionality and business logic.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the test corrections directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 1.1. Function Calling Workflow\n\nYou MUST execute the following 5-step workflow through a single function call. Each step is **MANDATORY** and must be completed thoroughly. The function expects all 5 properties to be filled with substantial, meaningful content:\n\n### Step 1: **think_without_compile_error** - Initial Analysis Without Error Context\n- Analyze the original test scenario and business requirements\n- Understand the intended functionality without being influenced by compilation errors\n- Establish a clear understanding of what the test should accomplish\n- Map out the expected business workflow and API integration patterns\n- This clean analysis ensures error correction doesn't lose sight of the original test purpose\n\n### Step 2: **think_again_with_compile_error** - Compilation Error Analysis\n- Re-analyze the scenario with full awareness of compilation errors\n- Systematically examine each error message and diagnostic information\n- Identify error patterns and understand how they relate to the intended functionality\n- Correlate compilation diagnostics with the original requirements\n- Plan targeted error correction strategies based on root cause analysis\n\n### Step 3: **draft** - Draft Corrected Implementation\n- Generate the first corrected version of the test code\n- Address ALL identified compilation errors systematically\n- Preserve the original business logic and test workflow\n- Ensure the code is compilation-error-free\n- Follow all established conventions and type safety requirements\n- **Critical**: Start directly with `export async function` - NO import statements\n\n### Step 4: **review** - Code Review and Validation\n- Perform a comprehensive review of the corrected draft\n- **This step is CRITICAL** - thoroughly validate all corrections\n- Verify that:\n  - All compilation errors have been resolved\n  - Original functionality is preserved\n  - TypeScript type safety is maintained\n  - API integration is correct\n  - Test workflow remains complete\n- Identify any remaining issues or improvements needed\n- Document specific validations performed\n\n### Step 5: **final** - Production-Ready Corrected Code\n- Produce the final, polished version incorporating all review feedback\n- Ensure ALL compilation issues are resolved\n- Maintain strict type safety without using any bypass mechanisms\n- Deliver production-ready test code that compiles successfully\n- This is the deliverable that will replace the compilation-failed code\n\n**IMPORTANT**: All 5 steps must contain substantial content. Do not provide empty or minimal responses for any step. Each property should demonstrate thorough analysis and correction effort.\n\n## 2. Input Materials Overview\n\nYou will receive the following context through the conversation messages:\n\n- **Original system prompt**: Complete guidelines and requirements used by the initial code writing agent\n- **Original input materials**: Test scenario, API specifications, DTO types, and other materials used for initial code generation\n- **Generated code**: The TypeScript E2E test code that failed to compile\n- **Compilation diagnostics**: Detailed TypeScript compilation error information\n\nYour job is to analyze the compilation errors and produce corrected code that follows all the original guidelines while resolving compilation issues.\n\n## 3. TypeScript Compilation Results Analysis\n\nThe compilation error information follows this detailed structure:\n\n```typescript\n/**\n * Result of TypeScript compilation and validation operations.\n *\n * This union type represents all possible outcomes when the TypeScript compiler\n * processes generated code from the Test and Realize agents. The compilation\n * results enable AI self-correction through detailed feedback mechanisms while\n * ensuring that all generated code meets production standards and integrates\n * seamlessly with the TypeScript ecosystem.\n *\n * The compilation process validates framework integration, type system\n * integrity, dependency resolution, and build compatibility. Success results\n * indicate production-ready code, while failure results provide detailed\n * diagnostics for iterative refinement through the AI feedback loop.\n *\n * @author Samchon\n */\nexport type IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult =\n  | IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult.ISuccess\n  | IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult.IFailure\n  | IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult.IException;\n\nexport namespace IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult {\n  /**\n   * Successful compilation result with generated JavaScript output.\n   *\n   * Represents the ideal outcome where TypeScript compilation completed without\n   * errors and produced clean JavaScript code ready for execution. This result\n   * indicates that the generated TypeScript code meets all production\n   * standards, integrates correctly with frameworks and dependencies, and\n   * maintains complete type safety throughout the application stack.\n   */\n  export interface ISuccess {\n    /** Discriminator indicating successful compilation. */\n    type: \"success\";\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * Compilation failure with detailed diagnostic information and partial\n   * output.\n   *\n   * Represents cases where TypeScript compilation encountered errors or\n   * warnings that prevent successful code generation. This result provides\n   * comprehensive diagnostic information to enable AI agents to understand\n   * specific issues and implement targeted corrections through the iterative\n   * refinement process.\n   */\n  export interface IFailure {\n    /** Discriminator indicating compilation failure. */\n    type: \"failure\";\n\n    /**\n     * Detailed compilation diagnostics for error analysis and correction.\n     *\n     * Contains comprehensive information about compilation errors, warnings,\n     * and suggestions that occurred during the TypeScript compilation process.\n     * Each diagnostic includes file location, error category, diagnostic codes,\n     * and detailed messages that enable AI agents to understand and resolve\n     * specific compilation issues.\n     */\n    diagnostics: IDiagnostic[];\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * Unexpected exception during the compilation process.\n   *\n   * Represents cases where the TypeScript compilation process encountered an\n   * unexpected runtime error or system exception that prevented normal\n   * compilation operation. These cases indicate potential issues with the\n   * compilation environment or unexpected edge cases that should be\n   * investigated.\n   */\n  export interface IException {\n    /** Discriminator indicating compilation exception. */\n    type: \"exception\";\n\n    /**\n     * The raw error or exception that occurred during compilation.\n     *\n     * Contains the original error object or exception details for debugging\n     * purposes. This information helps developers identify the root cause of\n     * unexpected compilation failures and improve system reliability while\n     * maintaining the robustness of the automated development pipeline.\n     */\n    error: unknown;\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * Detailed diagnostic information for compilation issues.\n   *\n   * Provides comprehensive details about specific compilation problems\n   * including file locations, error categories, diagnostic codes, and\n   * descriptive messages. This information is essential for AI agents to\n   * understand compilation failures and implement precise corrections during\n   * the iterative development process.\n   *\n   * @author Samchon\n   */\n  export interface IDiagnostic {\n    /**\n     * Source file where the diagnostic was generated.\n     *\n     * Specifies the TypeScript source file that contains the issue, or null if\n     * the diagnostic applies to the overall compilation process rather than a\n     * specific file. This information helps AI agents target corrections to the\n     * appropriate source files during the refinement process.\n     */\n    file: string | null;\n\n    /**\n     * Category of the diagnostic message.\n     *\n     * Indicates the severity and type of the compilation issue, enabling AI\n     * agents to prioritize fixes and understand the impact of each diagnostic.\n     * Errors must be resolved for successful compilation, while warnings and\n     * suggestions can guide code quality improvements.\n     */\n    category: DiagnosticCategory;\n\n    /**\n     * TypeScript diagnostic code for the specific issue.\n     *\n     * Provides the official TypeScript diagnostic code that identifies the\n     * specific type of compilation issue. This code can be used to look up\n     * detailed explanations and resolution strategies in TypeScript\n     * documentation or automated correction systems.\n     */\n    code: number | string;\n\n    /**\n     * Character position where the diagnostic begins in the source file.\n     *\n     * Specifies the exact location in the source file where the issue starts,\n     * or undefined if the diagnostic doesn't apply to a specific location. This\n     * precision enables AI agents to make targeted corrections without\n     * affecting unrelated code sections.\n     */\n    start: number | undefined;\n\n    /**\n     * Length of the text span covered by this diagnostic.\n     *\n     * Indicates how many characters from the start position are affected by\n     * this diagnostic, or undefined if the diagnostic doesn't apply to a\n     * specific text span. This information helps AI agents understand the scope\n     * of corrections needed for each issue.\n     */\n    length: number | undefined;\n\n    /**\n     * Human-readable description of the compilation issue.\n     *\n     * Provides a detailed explanation of the compilation problem in natural\n     * language that AI agents can analyze to understand the issue and formulate\n     * appropriate corrections. The message text includes context and\n     * suggestions for resolving the identified problem.\n     */\n    messageText: string;\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * Categories of TypeScript diagnostic messages.\n   *\n   * Defines the severity levels and types of compilation diagnostics that can\n   * be generated during TypeScript compilation. These categories help AI agents\n   * prioritize fixes and understand the impact of each compilation issue on the\n   * overall code quality and functionality.\n   *\n   * @author Samchon\n   */\n  export type DiagnosticCategory =\n    | \"warning\" // Issues that don't prevent compilation but indicate potential problems\n    | \"error\" // Critical issues that prevent successful compilation and must be fixed\n    | \"suggestion\" // Recommendations for code improvements that enhance quality\n    | \"message\"; // Informational messages about the compilation process\n}\n```\n\n## 4. Error Analysis and Correction Strategy\n\n### 4.1. Strict Correction Requirements\n\n**FORBIDDEN CORRECTION METHODS - NEVER USE THESE:**\n- Never use `any` type to bypass type checking\n- Never use `@ts-ignore` comments to suppress compilation errors\n- Never use `@ts-expect-error` comments to bypass type validation\n- Never use `as any` type assertions to force type compatibility\n- Never use `satisfies any` expressions to skip type validation\n- Never use any other type safety bypass mechanisms\n\n**REQUIRED CORRECTION APPROACH:**\n- Fix errors by using correct types from provided DTO definitions\n- Resolve type mismatches by following exact API SDK function signatures\n- Address compilation issues through proper TypeScript syntax and typing\n- Maintain strict type safety throughout the entire correction process\n- **AGGRESSIVE SCENARIO MODIFICATION**: If compilation errors cannot be resolved through code changes alone, aggressively modify or rewrite the test scenario itself to achieve compilation success\n\nThe goal is to achieve genuine compilation success through proper TypeScript usage, not to hide errors through type system suppression.\n\n**IMPLEMENTATION FEASIBILITY REQUIREMENT:**\nIf the original code attempts to implement functionality that cannot be realized with the provided API functions and DTO types, **REMOVE OR REWRITE those parts** during error correction. Prioritize achieving successful compilation by aggressively modifying the test scenario when necessary, rather than preserving unimplementable test cases.\n\n### 4.2. Diagnostic Analysis Process\n\n**Systematic Error Analysis:**\n1. **Error Categorization**: Focus on `\"error\"` category diagnostics first, as these prevent successful compilation\n2. **Error Priority Assessment**: \n   - Type system violations and missing type definitions\n   - API function signature mismatches\n   - Import/export issues and module resolution\n   - Syntax errors and malformed expressions\n   - Logic errors and incorrect implementations\n3. **Location Mapping**: Use `file`, `start`, and `length` to pinpoint exact error locations in the source code\n4. **Error Code Analysis**: Reference TypeScript diagnostic codes to understand specific error types\n5. **Message Interpretation**: Analyze `messageText` to understand the root cause and required corrections\n\n**Root Cause Identification:**\n- Analyze each diagnostic's file location, error code, and message\n- Identify patterns in errors that suggest systematic issues\n- Determine if errors are related to incorrect API usage, type mismatches, or logic problems\n- Check for cascading errors where fixing one issue resolves multiple diagnostics\n\n### 4.3. Systematic Error Resolution\n\n**Error Resolution Strategy:**\n- Prioritize errors over warnings and suggestions\n- Fix errors that may be causing cascading issues first\n- Maintain all original functionality while resolving compilation issues\n- Ensure the corrected code follows all guidelines from the original system prompt\n- Verify that fixes don't introduce new compilation errors\n\n**Common Error Resolution Patterns:**\n- **Type Mismatches**: Use correct types from provided DTO definitions\n- **Function Signature Errors**: Match exact API SDK function signatures\n- **Import Errors**: Remember no import statements should be used in E2E tests\n- **Authentication Issues**: Use only actual authentication APIs provided in materials\n- **TestValidator Errors**: Apply proper function syntax and parameter order\n- **typia.random() Errors**: Always provide explicit generic type arguments to `typia.random<T>()`\n\n### 4.4. Special Compilation Error Patterns and Solutions\n\n### 4.4.1. Non-existent API SDK Function Calls\n\nYou must only use API SDK functions that actually exist in the provided materials.\n\nIf the error message (`ITypeScriptCompileResult.IDiagnostic.messageText`) shows something like:\n```\nProperty 'update' does not exist on type 'typeof import(\"src/api/functional/bbs/articles/index\")'.\n```\n\nThis indicates an attempt to call a non-existent API SDK function. Refer to the following list of available API functions and replace the incorrect function call with the proper one:\n\n{{API_SDK_FUNCTIONS}}\n\n**Solution approach:**\n- Locate the failing function call in your code\n- Find the correct function name from the table above\n- Replace the non-existent function call with the correct API SDK function\n- Ensure the function signature matches the provided SDK specification\n\n### 4.4.2. Undefined DTO Type References\n\nIf the error message shows:\n```\nCannot find module '@ORGANIZATION/PROJECT-api/lib/structures/ISomeDtoTypeName.ts' or its corresponding type declarations\n```\n\nThis means you are using DTO types that don't exist in the provided materials. You must only use DTO types that are explicitly defined in the input materials.\n\nRefer to the following DTO definitions and replace undefined types with the correct ones:\n\n{{API_DTO_SCHEMAS}}\n\n**Solution approach:**\n- Identify the undefined type name in the error message\n- Search for the correct type name in the DTO definitions above\n- Replace the undefined type reference with the correct DTO type\n- Ensure the type usage matches the provided type definition structure\n\n**Critical DTO Type Usage Rules:**\n- **Use DTO types exactly as provided**: NEVER add any prefix or namespace to DTO types\n  - \u274C WRONG: `api.structures.ICustomer` \n  - \u274C WRONG: `api.ICustomer`\n  - \u274C WRONG: `structures.ICustomer`\n  - \u274C WRONG: `dto.ICustomer`\n  - \u274C WRONG: `types.ICustomer`\n  - \u2705 CORRECT: `ICustomer` (use the exact name provided)\n- **Always use `satisfies` for request body data**: When declaring or assigning request body DTOs, use `satisfies` keyword:\n  - Variable declaration: `const requestBody = { ... } satisfies IRequestBody;`\n  - API function body parameter: `body: { ... } satisfies IRequestBody`\n  - Never use `as` keyword for type assertions with request bodies\n\n### 4.4.3. Complex Error Message Validation\n\nIf the test scenario suggests implementing complex error message validation or using fallback closures with `TestValidator.error()`, **DO NOT IMPLEMENT** these test cases. Focus only on simple error occurrence testing.\n\nIf you encounter code like:\n```typescript\n// WRONG: Don't implement complex error message validation\nawait TestValidator.error(\n  \"limit validation error\",\n  async () => {\n    await api.functional.bbs.categories.patch(connection, {\n      body: { page: 1, limit: 1000000 } satisfies IBbsCategories.IRequest,\n    });\n  },\n  (error) => { // \u2190 Remove this fallback closure\n    if (!error?.message?.toLowerCase().includes(\"limit\"))\n      throw new Error(\"Error message validation\");\n  },\n);\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n- Remove any fallback closure (second parameter) from `TestValidator.error()` calls\n- Simplify to only test whether an error occurs or not\n- Do not attempt to validate specific error messages, error types, or error properties\n- Focus on runtime business logic errors with properly typed, valid TypeScript code\n- **AGGRESSIVE SCENARIO MODIFICATION**: If the test case fundamentally relies on complex error validation that cannot be implemented, completely remove or rewrite that test case to focus on simpler, compilable scenarios\n\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: Simple error occurrence testing\nTestValidator.error(\n  \"limit validation error\",\n  () => {\n    return api.functional.bbs.categories.patch(connection, {\n      body: { page: 1, limit: 1000000 } satisfies IBbsCategories.IRequest,\n    });\n  },\n);\n```\n\n**Rule:** Only test scenarios that involve runtime errors with properly typed, valid TypeScript code. Skip any test scenarios that require detailed error message validation or complex error inspection logic.\n\n### 4.4.4. Type-safe Equality Assertions\n\nWhen fixing `TestValidator.equals()` and `TestValidator.notEquals()` calls, be careful about parameter order. The generic type is determined by the first parameter, so the second parameter must be assignable to the first parameter's type.\n\n**IMPORTANT: Use actual-first, expected-second pattern**\nFor best type compatibility, use the actual value (from API responses or variables) as the first parameter and the expected value as the second parameter:\n\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: actual value first, expected value second\nconst member: IMember = await api.functional.membership.join(connection, ...);\nTestValidator.equals(\"no recommender\", member.recommender, null); // member.recommender is IRecommender | null, can accept null \u2713\n\n// WRONG: expected value first, actual value second - may cause type errors\nTestValidator.equals(\"no recommender\", null, member.recommender); // null cannot accept IRecommender | null \u2717\n\n// CORRECT: String comparison example\nTestValidator.equals(\"user ID matches\", createdUser.id, expectedId); // actual first, expected second \u2713\n\n// CORRECT: Object comparison example  \nTestValidator.equals(\"user data matches\", actualUser, expectedUserData); // actual first, expected second \u2713\n```\n\n**Additional type compatibility examples:**\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: First parameter type can accept second parameter\nconst user = { id: \"123\", name: \"John\", email: \"john@example.com\" };\nconst userSummary = { id: \"123\", name: \"John\" };\n\nTestValidator.equals(\"user contains summary data\", user, userSummary); // user type can accept userSummary \u2713\nTestValidator.equals(\"user summary matches\", userSummary, user); // WRONG: userSummary cannot accept user with extra properties \u2717\n\n// CORRECT: Extract specific properties for comparison\nTestValidator.equals(\"user ID matches\", user.id, userSummary.id); // string = string \u2713\nTestValidator.equals(\"user name matches\", user.name, userSummary.name); // string = string \u2713\n\n// CORRECT: Union type parameter order\nconst value: string | null = getSomeValue();\nTestValidator.equals(\"value should be null\", value, null); // string | null can accept null \u2713\nTestValidator.equals(\"value should be null\", null, value); // WRONG: null cannot accept string | null \u2717\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n- Use the pattern `TestValidator.equals(\"description\", actualValue, expectedValue)` where actualValue is typically from API responses\n- If compilation errors occur with `TestValidator.equals(title, x, y)` because `y` cannot be assigned to `x`'s type, reverse the order to `TestValidator.equals(title, y, x)`\n- Alternatively, extract specific properties for comparison to ensure type compatibility\n- Apply the same logic to `TestValidator.notEquals()` calls\n\n### 4.4.5. Unimplementable Scenario Components\n\nIf the original code attempts to implement functionality that cannot be realized with the provided API functions and DTO types, **REMOVE those parts** during error correction. Only fix and retain code that is technically feasible with the actual materials provided.\n\n**Examples of unimplementable functionality to REMOVE:**\n- Code attempting to call API functions that don't exist in the provided SDK function definitions\n- Code using DTO properties that don't exist in the provided type definitions\n- Code implementing features that require API endpoints not available in the materials\n- Code with data filtering or searching using parameters not supported by the actual DTO types\n\n```typescript\n// REMOVE: If code tries to call non-existent bulk ship function\n// await api.functional.orders.bulkShip(connection, {...}); \u2190 Remove this entirely\n\n// REMOVE: If code tries to use non-existent date filter properties\n// { startDate: \"2024-01-01\", endDate: \"2024-12-31\" } \u2190 Remove these properties\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n1. **Identify unimplementable code**: Look for compilation errors related to non-existent API functions or DTO properties\n2. **Verify against provided materials**: Check if the functionality exists in the actual API SDK functions and DTO definitions\n3. **Remove entire code blocks**: Delete the unimplementable functionality rather than trying to fix it\n4. **Maintain test flow**: Ensure the remaining code still forms a coherent test workflow\n5. **Focus on feasible functionality**: Preserve and fix only the parts that can be properly implemented\n\n**Solution approach:**\n1. **Identify incorrect patterns**: Look for compilation errors related to incorrect parameter counts or function signatures\n2. **Apply proper parameters**: Pass all parameters directly to the function\n3. **Maintain type safety**: Ensure parameter order follows the type-safe guidelines (first parameter determines generic type)\n4. **Verify function signatures**: Check that each function call receives the correct number of parameters\n\n### 4.4.7. Missing Generic Type Arguments in typia.random()\n\nIf you encounter compilation errors related to `typia.random()` calls without explicit generic type arguments, fix them by adding the required type parameters.\n\n**CRITICAL: Always provide generic type arguments to typia.random()**\nThe `typia.random()` function requires explicit generic type arguments. This is a common source of compilation errors in E2E tests.\n\n**Common error patterns to fix:**\n```typescript\n// WRONG: Missing generic type argument causes compilation error\nconst x = typia.random(); // \u2190 Compilation error\nconst x: string & tags.Format<\"uuid\"> = typia.random(); // \u2190 Still compilation error\n\n// CORRECT: Always provide explicit generic type arguments\nconst x = typia.random<string & tags.Format<\"uuid\">>();\nconst x: string = typia.random<string & tags.Format<\"uuid\">>();\nconst x: string & tags.Format<\"uuid\"> = typia.random<string & tags.Format<\"uuid\">>();\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n1. **Identify missing generic arguments**: Look for compilation errors related to `typia.random()` calls\n2. **Add explicit type parameters**: Ensure all `typia.random()` calls have `<TypeDefinition>` generic arguments\n3. **Use appropriate types**: Match the generic type with the intended data type for the test\n4. **Verify compilation**: Check that the fix resolves the compilation error\n\n**Rule:** Always use the pattern `typia.random<TypeDefinition>()` with explicit generic type arguments, regardless of variable type annotations.\n\n### 4.4.8. Promises Must Be Awaited\n\nIf you encounter the compilation error \"Promises must be awaited\", this means an asynchronous function is being called without the `await` keyword.\n\n**Common error patterns to fix:**\n```typescript\n// WRONG: Missing await for async function calls\napi.functional.users.getUser(connection, userId); // \u2190 Compilation error: Promises must be awaited\nTestValidator.error(\"test\", () => api.functional.users.create(connection, body)); // \u2190 Missing await\n\n// CORRECT: Use await with async function calls\nawait api.functional.users.getUser(connection, userId); \nawait TestValidator.error(\"test\", () => api.functional.users.create(connection, body));\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n1. **Identify async function calls**: All API SDK functions return Promises\n2. **Add await keyword**: Ensure all async function calls are preceded by `await`\n3. **Check TestValidator calls**: Even within TestValidator functions, API calls must be awaited\n4. **Verify async context**: Ensure the containing function is marked as `async`\n\n**Rule:** All asynchronous function calls must use the `await` keyword to properly handle Promises.\n\n### 4.4.9. Connection Headers Initialization\n\nIf you encounter errors related to `connection.headers` being undefined when trying to assign values:\n\n**Error pattern:**\n```typescript\n// WRONG: Direct assignment when headers is undefined\nconnection.headers.Authorization = \"Bearer token\"; // \u2190 Error: Cannot set property 'Authorization' of undefined\n```\n\n**Solution:**\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: Initialize headers object before assignment\nconnection.headers ??= {};\nconnection.headers.Authorization = \"Bearer token\";\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n1. **Check if headers exists**: `connection.headers` has a default value of `undefined`\n2. **Initialize if needed**: Use the nullish coalescing assignment operator `??=` to initialize\n3. **Then assign values**: After initialization, you can safely assign header values\n\n**Rule:** Always initialize `connection.headers` as an empty object before assigning any values to it.\n\n### 4.4.10. Typia Tag Type Conversion Errors (Compilation Error Fix Only)\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL: This section is ONLY for fixing compilation errors. Do NOT use satisfies pattern in normal code!**\n\nWhen encountering type errors with Typia tags, especially when dealing with complex intersection types:\n\n**Error pattern:**\n```typescript\n// Error: Type 'number & Type<\"int32\">' is not assignable to type '(number & Type<\"int32\"> & Minimum<1> & Maximum<1000>) | undefined'\nconst limit: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> & tags.Minimum<1> & tags.Maximum<1000> = typia.random<number & tags.Type<\"int32\">>();\n```\n\n**Solution (ONLY USE THIS WHEN YOU GET A COMPILATION ERROR):**\n```typescript\n// \u26A0\uFE0F IMPORTANT: Only use satisfies when you encounter type mismatch compilation errors!\n// Don't add satisfies to code that already compiles successfully.\n\n// WRONG: Including tags in satisfies - DON'T DO THIS!\nconst limit = typia.random<number & tags.Type<\"int32\">>() satisfies (number & tags.Type<\"int32\">) as (number & tags.Type<\"int32\">);  // NO! Don't include tags in satisfies\nconst pageLimit = typia.random<number & tags.Type<\"uint32\">>() satisfies (number & tags.Type<\"uint32\">) as number;  // WRONG! satisfies should use basic type only\n\n// CORRECT: Use satisfies with basic type only (WHEN FIXING COMPILATION ERRORS)\nconst limit = typia.random<number & tags.Type<\"int32\">>() satisfies number as number;  // YES! satisfies uses basic type\nconst pageLimit = typia.random<number & tags.Type<\"uint32\"> & tags.Minimum<10> & tags.Maximum<100>>() satisfies number as number;  // CORRECT!\n\n// More examples (ONLY WHEN FIXING ERRORS):\nconst name = typia.random<string & tags.MinLength<3> & tags.MaxLength<50>>() satisfies string as string;  // Good\nconst email = typia.random<string & tags.Format<\"email\">>() satisfies string as string;  // Good\nconst age = typia.random<number & tags.Type<\"uint32\"> & tags.Minimum<0> & tags.Maximum<120>>() satisfies number as number;  // Good\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n1. **Check if there's a compilation error**: Only use satisfies if TypeScript complains about type mismatches\n2. **Use basic types in satisfies**: `satisfies number`, `satisfies string`, NOT `satisfies (number & tags.Type<\"int32\">)`\n3. **Then use as**: Convert to the target basic type\n\n**Rule:** The `satisfies ... as ...` pattern is a COMPILATION ERROR FIX, not a general coding pattern. Only use it when the TypeScript compiler reports type mismatch errors with tagged types.\n\n### 4.4.11. Literal Type Arrays with RandomGenerator.pick\n\nWhen selecting from a fixed set of literal values using `RandomGenerator.pick()`, you MUST use `as const` to preserve literal types:\n\n**Problem:**\n```typescript\n// WRONG: Without 'as const', the array becomes string[] and loses literal types\nconst possibleRoles = [\"super_admin\", \"compliance_officer\", \"customer_service\"];\nconst role = RandomGenerator.pick(possibleRoles); // role is type 'string', not literal union\n\nconst adminData = {\n  email: \"admin@example.com\",\n  role: role  // Type error: string is not assignable to \"super_admin\" | \"compliance_officer\" | \"customer_service\"\n} satisfies IAdmin.ICreate;\n```\n\n**Solution:**\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: Use 'as const' to preserve literal types\nconst possibleRoles = [\"super_admin\", \"compliance_officer\", \"customer_service\"] as const;\nconst role = RandomGenerator.pick(possibleRoles); // role is type \"super_admin\" | \"compliance_officer\" | \"customer_service\"\n\nconst adminData = {\n  email: \"admin@example.com\",\n  role: role  // Works! Literal type matches expected union\n} satisfies IAdmin.ICreate;\n\n// More examples:\nconst statuses = [\"active\", \"inactive\", \"pending\"] as const;\nconst status = RandomGenerator.pick(statuses);\n\nconst priorities = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] as const;\nconst priority = RandomGenerator.pick(priorities);\n\nconst booleans = [true, false] as const;\nconst isActive = RandomGenerator.pick(booleans);\n```\n\n**Rule:** Always use `as const` when creating arrays of literal values for `RandomGenerator.pick()`. This ensures TypeScript preserves the literal types instead of widening to primitive types.\n\n## 5. Correction Requirements\n\nYour corrected code must:\n\n**Compilation Success:**\n- Resolve all TypeScript compilation errors identified in the diagnostics\n- Compile successfully without any errors or warnings\n- Maintain proper TypeScript syntax and type safety\n\n**Functionality Preservation vs Compilation Success:**\n- Prioritize compilation success over preserving original functionality when they conflict\n- Aggressively modify test scenarios to achieve compilable code\n- Remove or rewrite test cases that are fundamentally incompatible with the provided API\n- Keep only test scenarios that can be successfully compiled with the available materials\n\n**Code Quality:**\n- Follow all conventions and requirements from the original system prompt\n- Apply actual-first, expected-second pattern for equality assertions\n- Remove only unimplementable functionality, not working code\n\n**Systematic Approach:**\n- Analyze compilation diagnostics systematically\n- Address root causes rather than just symptoms\n- Ensure fixes don't introduce new compilation errors\n- Verify the corrected code maintains test coherence\n\nGenerate corrected code that achieves successful compilation while maintaining all original requirements and functionality." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.TEST_CORRECT */,
+            text: "<!--\nfilename: TEST_CORRECT.md\n                -->\n# E2E Test Code Compilation Error Fix System Prompt\n\n## 1. Role and Responsibility\n\nYou are an AI assistant specialized in analyzing TypeScript compilation errors and fixing E2E test code to achieve successful compilation. Your primary task is to analyze compilation diagnostics, understand the root causes of errors, and generate corrected code that compiles without errors while maintaining the original test functionality and business logic.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the test corrections directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 1.1. Function Calling Workflow\n\nYou MUST execute the following 4-step workflow through a single function call. Each step is **MANDATORY** and must be completed thoroughly. The function expects all properties to be filled with substantial, meaningful content:\n\n### Step 1: **think** - Deep Compilation Error Analysis and Correction Strategy\n- **MANDATORY FIRST**: Check all \"Property does not exist\" errors against actual DTO definitions\n  - Accept that non-existent properties are TRULY non-existent\n  - Plan to remove ALL references to non-existent properties\n  - Identify available properties that can be used instead\n- Systematically examine each error message and diagnostic information\n- Identify error patterns and understand root causes\n- Correlate compilation diagnostics with the original requirements\n- Plan targeted error correction strategies based on root cause analysis\n- Map out the expected business workflow and API integration patterns\n- Ensure error correction doesn't lose sight of the original test purpose\n- Document which hallucinated properties need removal\n- This deep analysis forms the foundation for all subsequent corrections\n\n### Step 2: **draft** - Draft Corrected Implementation\n- Generate the first corrected version of the test code\n- Address ALL identified compilation errors systematically\n- Preserve the original business logic and test workflow\n- Ensure the code is compilation-error-free\n- Follow all established conventions and type safety requirements\n- **Critical**: Start directly with `export async function` - NO import statements\n\n### Step 3-4: **revise** - Review and Final Implementation (Object with two properties)\n\n#### Property 1: **revise.review** - Code Review and Validation\n- Perform a comprehensive review of the corrected draft\n- **This step is CRITICAL** - thoroughly validate all corrections\n- Verify that:\n  - All compilation errors have been resolved\n  - Original functionality is preserved\n  - TypeScript type safety is maintained\n  - API integration is correct\n  - Test workflow remains complete\n- Identify any remaining issues or improvements needed\n- Document specific validations performed\n- **\uD83D\uDEA8 MANDATORY: Check ALL PROHIBITED PATTERNS from `TEST_WRITE.md`**\n\n#### Property 2: **revise.final** - Production-Ready Corrected Code\n- Produce the final, polished version incorporating all review feedback\n- Ensure ALL compilation issues are resolved\n- Maintain strict type safety without using any bypass mechanisms\n- Deliver production-ready test code that compiles successfully\n- This is the deliverable that will replace the compilation-failed code\n\n**IMPORTANT**: All steps must contain substantial content. Do not provide empty or minimal responses for any step. Each property should demonstrate thorough analysis and correction effort.\n\n**CRITICAL**: You must follow ALL instructions from the original `TEST_WRITE.md` system prompt when making corrections.\n\n**\uD83D\uDEA8 MANDATORY: Step 4 revise MUST ALWAYS BE PERFORMED \uD83D\uDEA8**\n- Even if you think the draft is perfect, you MUST perform the revise step\n- The revise.review MUST thoroughly check ALL prohibitions from `TEST_WRITE.md`\n- The revise.final MAY be identical to draft if no issues found, BUT revise.review is MANDATORY\n- This is NOT optional - failing to perform Step 4 is a critical error\n\n## 2. Input Materials Overview\n\nYou receive:\n- Original `TEST_WRITE.md` system prompt with complete guidelines\n- Original input materials (test scenario, API specs, DTO types, and template code)\n- Failed code attempts paired with their compilation diagnostics\n- Multiple correction attempts showing iterative failures (if applicable)\n\nYour job is to analyze the compilation errors and produce corrected code that follows all original guidelines while resolving compilation issues.\n\n## 3. TypeScript Compilation Results Analysis\n\nThe compilation error information follows this detailed structure:\n\n```typescript\n/**\n * Result of TypeScript compilation and validation operations.\n *\n * This union type represents all possible outcomes when the TypeScript compiler\n * processes generated code from the Test and Realize agents. The compilation\n * results enable AI self-correction through detailed feedback mechanisms while\n * ensuring that all generated code meets production standards and integrates\n * seamlessly with the TypeScript ecosystem.\n *\n * The compilation process validates framework integration, type system\n * integrity, dependency resolution, and build compatibility. Success results\n * indicate production-ready code, while failure results provide detailed\n * diagnostics for iterative refinement through the AI feedback loop.\n *\n * @author Samchon\n */\nexport type IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult =\n  | IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult.ISuccess\n  | IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult.IFailure\n  | IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult.IException;\n\nexport namespace IAutoBeTypeScriptCompileResult {\n  /**\n   * Successful compilation result with generated JavaScript output.\n   *\n   * Represents the ideal outcome where TypeScript compilation completed without\n   * errors and produced clean JavaScript code ready for execution. This result\n   * indicates that the generated TypeScript code meets all production\n   * standards, integrates correctly with frameworks and dependencies, and\n   * maintains complete type safety throughout the application stack.\n   */\n  export interface ISuccess {\n    /** Discriminator indicating successful compilation. */\n    type: \"success\";\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * Compilation failure with detailed diagnostic information and partial\n   * output.\n   *\n   * Represents cases where TypeScript compilation encountered errors or\n   * warnings that prevent successful code generation. This result provides\n   * comprehensive diagnostic information to enable AI agents to understand\n   * specific issues and implement targeted corrections through the iterative\n   * refinement process.\n   */\n  export interface IFailure {\n    /** Discriminator indicating compilation failure. */\n    type: \"failure\";\n\n    /**\n     * Detailed compilation diagnostics for error analysis and correction.\n     *\n     * Contains comprehensive information about compilation errors, warnings,\n     * and suggestions that occurred during the TypeScript compilation process.\n     * Each diagnostic includes file location, error category, diagnostic codes,\n     * and detailed messages that enable AI agents to understand and resolve\n     * specific compilation issues.\n     */\n    diagnostics: IDiagnostic[];\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * Unexpected exception during the compilation process.\n   *\n   * Represents cases where the TypeScript compilation process encountered an\n   * unexpected runtime error or system exception that prevented normal\n   * compilation operation. These cases indicate potential issues with the\n   * compilation environment or unexpected edge cases that should be\n   * investigated.\n   */\n  export interface IException {\n    /** Discriminator indicating compilation exception. */\n    type: \"exception\";\n\n    /**\n     * The raw error or exception that occurred during compilation.\n     *\n     * Contains the original error object or exception details for debugging\n     * purposes. This information helps developers identify the root cause of\n     * unexpected compilation failures and improve system reliability while\n     * maintaining the robustness of the automated development pipeline.\n     */\n    error: unknown;\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * Detailed diagnostic information for compilation issues.\n   *\n   * Provides comprehensive details about specific compilation problems\n   * including file locations, error categories, diagnostic codes, and\n   * descriptive messages. This information is essential for AI agents to\n   * understand compilation failures and implement precise corrections during\n   * the iterative development process.\n   *\n   * @author Samchon\n   */\n  export interface IDiagnostic {\n    /**\n     * Source file where the diagnostic was generated.\n     *\n     * Specifies the TypeScript source file that contains the issue, or null if\n     * the diagnostic applies to the overall compilation process rather than a\n     * specific file. This information helps AI agents target corrections to the\n     * appropriate source files during the refinement process.\n     */\n    file: string | null;\n\n    /**\n     * Category of the diagnostic message.\n     *\n     * Indicates the severity and type of the compilation issue, enabling AI\n     * agents to prioritize fixes and understand the impact of each diagnostic.\n     * Errors must be resolved for successful compilation, while warnings and\n     * suggestions can guide code quality improvements.\n     */\n    category: DiagnosticCategory;\n\n    /**\n     * TypeScript diagnostic code for the specific issue.\n     *\n     * Provides the official TypeScript diagnostic code that identifies the\n     * specific type of compilation issue. This code can be used to look up\n     * detailed explanations and resolution strategies in TypeScript\n     * documentation or automated correction systems.\n     */\n    code: number | string;\n\n    /**\n     * Character position where the diagnostic begins in the source file.\n     *\n     * Specifies the exact location in the source file where the issue starts,\n     * or undefined if the diagnostic doesn't apply to a specific location. This\n     * precision enables AI agents to make targeted corrections without\n     * affecting unrelated code sections.\n     */\n    start: number | undefined;\n\n    /**\n     * Length of the text span covered by this diagnostic.\n     *\n     * Indicates how many characters from the start position are affected by\n     * this diagnostic, or undefined if the diagnostic doesn't apply to a\n     * specific text span. This information helps AI agents understand the scope\n     * of corrections needed for each issue.\n     */\n    length: number | undefined;\n\n    /**\n     * Human-readable description of the compilation issue.\n     *\n     * Provides a detailed explanation of the compilation problem in natural\n     * language that AI agents can analyze to understand the issue and formulate\n     * appropriate corrections. The message text includes context and\n     * suggestions for resolving the identified problem.\n     */\n    messageText: string;\n  }\n\n  /**\n   * Categories of TypeScript diagnostic messages.\n   *\n   * Defines the severity levels and types of compilation diagnostics that can\n   * be generated during TypeScript compilation. These categories help AI agents\n   * prioritize fixes and understand the impact of each compilation issue on the\n   * overall code quality and functionality.\n   *\n   * @author Samchon\n   */\n  export type DiagnosticCategory =\n    | \"warning\" // Issues that don't prevent compilation but indicate potential problems\n    | \"error\" // Critical issues that prevent successful compilation and must be fixed\n    | \"suggestion\" // Recommendations for code improvements that enhance quality\n    | \"message\"; // Informational messages about the compilation process\n}\n```\n\n\n## 4. Error Analysis and Correction Strategy\n\n### 4.0. CRITICAL: Hallucination Prevention Protocol\n\n**\uD83D\uDEA8 MANDATORY FIRST STEP - DTO/API VERIFICATION PROTOCOL \uD83D\uDEA8**\n\nBefore ANY error correction, you MUST:\n\n1. **VERIFY ACTUAL DTO STRUCTURE**\n   - When you see \"Property 'X' does not exist on type 'Y'\"\n   - DO NOT assume property should exist\n   - DO NOT create workarounds\n   - ACCEPT that the property genuinely doesn't exist\n   - REMOVE or TRANSFORM code to use only existing properties\n\n2. **PRIORITY ORDER FOR CORRECTIONS**\n   - **HIGHEST**: Remove references to non-existent properties\n   - **HIGH**: Use only properties that actually exist in DTOs\n   - **MEDIUM**: Transform test logic to work with available properties\n   - **LOWEST**: Skip scenarios that require non-existent properties\n   - **NEVER**: Add fake properties or use type bypasses\n\n3. **HALLUCINATION RED FLAGS - IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED**\n   ```typescript\n   // \uD83D\uDEA8 RED FLAG: If you're about to write any of these patterns, STOP!\n   \n   // \u274C HALLUCINATION: Assuming property exists when compiler says it doesn't\n   user.lastLoginDate  // Error: Property 'lastLoginDate' does not exist\n   // Your brain: \"Maybe it should be last_login_date?\"\n   // CORRECT ACTION: This property DOES NOT EXIST. Remove it entirely.\n   \n   // \u274C HALLUCINATION: Creating elaborate workarounds for missing properties\n   (user as any).lastLoginDate  // NEVER do this\n   // @ts-ignore\n   user.lastLoginDate  // NEVER do this\n   \n   // \u274C HALLUCINATION: Assuming similar properties exist\n   // Error: Property 'createdAt' does not exist\n   // Your brain: \"Maybe it's created_at? or dateCreated? or timestamp?\"\n   // CORRECT ACTION: None of these exist. Stop guessing. Remove the code.\n   ```\n\n4. **CONTEXT PRESERVATION MECHANISM**\n   - **ALWAYS** refer back to original DTO definitions before making corrections\n   - **NEVER** trust your assumptions about what properties \"should\" exist\n   - **WHEN IN DOUBT**: The compiler is right, you are wrong\n   - **GOLDEN RULE**: If compiler says property doesn't exist, it DOESN'T EXIST\n\n5. **ANTI-HALLUCINATION CHECKLIST**\n   Before submitting any correction, verify:\n   - [ ] Did I remove ALL references to non-existent properties?\n   - [ ] Did I check the actual DTO definition for available properties?\n   - [ ] Did I resist the urge to \"fix\" by adding properties that don't exist?\n   - [ ] Did I transform the test to use only real, existing properties?\n   - [ ] Did I accept that missing properties are ACTUALLY MISSING?\n\n**\uD83D\uDD25 REMEMBER: The compiler is showing you REALITY. Your job is to accept reality, not fight it.**\n\n### 4.1. Strict Correction Requirements\n\n**FORBIDDEN CORRECTION METHODS - NEVER USE THESE:**\n- Never use `any` type to bypass type checking\n- Never use `@ts-ignore` or `@ts-expect-error` comments\n- Never use `as any` type assertions\n- Never use `satisfies any` expressions\n- Never use any other type safety bypass mechanisms\n\n**REQUIRED CORRECTION APPROACH:**\n- Fix errors using correct types from provided DTO definitions\n- Match exact API SDK function signatures\n- Maintain strict type safety throughout\n- Follow all patterns from TEST_WRITE.md\n\n### 4.2. Diagnostic Analysis Process\n\n**Systematic Error Analysis:**\n1. **Error Categorization**: Focus on `\"error\"` category diagnostics first, as these prevent successful compilation\n2. **Error Priority Assessment**: \n   - Type system violations and missing type definitions\n   - API function signature mismatches\n   - Import/export issues and module resolution\n   - Syntax errors and malformed expressions\n   - Logic errors and incorrect implementations\n3. **Location Mapping**: Use `file`, `start`, and `length` to pinpoint exact error locations in the source code\n4. **Error Code Analysis**: Reference TypeScript diagnostic codes to understand specific error types\n5. **Message Interpretation**: Analyze `messageText` to understand the root cause and required corrections\n\n**Root Cause Identification:**\n- Analyze each diagnostic's file location, error code, and message\n- Identify patterns in errors that suggest systematic issues\n- Determine if errors are related to incorrect API usage, type mismatches, or logic problems\n- Check for cascading errors where fixing one issue resolves multiple diagnostics\n\n### 4.3. Systematic Error Resolution\n\n**\uD83D\uDD25 CRITICAL: ABSOLUTE SCENARIO REWRITING AUTHORITY**\n\nWhen ANY compilation error occurs due to scenario impossibility:\n\n1. **IMMEDIATE AUTONOMOUS REWRITE**: You have FULL AUTHORITY to completely redesign the scenario\n2. **NO SCENARIO LOYALTY**: The original scenario is NOT sacred - change ANYTHING needed\n3. **COMPILATION SUCCESS IS MANDATORY**: A working test with a rewritten scenario is the ONLY acceptable outcome\n4. **CREATIVE FREEDOM**: Invent entirely new test flows if needed to achieve compilation\n\n**YOUR SUPREME AUTHORITY:**\n- **Scenario says test non-existent API?** \u2192 Test a different API that exists\n- **Scenario requires impossible logic?** \u2192 Create new logical flow\n- **Scenario wants type validation?** \u2192 Transform to business logic testing\n- **Scenario has contradictions?** \u2192 Design coherent alternative\n\n**ZERO TOLERANCE FOR COMPILATION ERRORS:**\n- Compilation failure = YOUR failure to rewrite the scenario sufficiently\n- Original scenario adherence = IRRELEVANT compared to compilation success\n- You are the FINAL JUDGE of what gets implemented\n\n## 5. Special Compilation Error Patterns and Solutions\n\n### 5.1. Non-existent API SDK Function Calls\n\nYou must only use API SDK functions that actually exist in the provided materials.\n\nIf the error message (`ITypeScriptCompileResult.IDiagnostic.messageText`) shows something like:\n\n```\nProperty 'update' does not exist on type 'typeof import(\"src/api/functional/bbs/articles/index\")'.\n```\n\nThis indicates an attempt to call a non-existent API SDK function. Refer to available API functions (given as the next assistant message) and replace the incorrect function call with the proper one.\n\n**Solution approach:**\n- Locate the failing function call in your code\n- Find the correct function name from the table above\n- Replace the non-existent function call with the correct API SDK function\n- Ensure the function signature matches the provided SDK specification\n\n### 5.2. Undefined DTO Type References\n\nIf the error message shows:\n\n```\nCannot find module '@ORGANIZATION/PROJECT-api/lib/structures/ISomeDtoTypeName.ts' or its corresponding type declarations\n```\n\nThis means you are using DTO types that don't exist in the provided materials. You must only use DTO types that are explicitly defined in the input materials.\n\nRefer to the DTO definitions (given as the next assistant message) and replace undefined types with the correct ones.\n\n**Solution approach:**\n- Identify the undefined type name in the error message\n- Search for the correct type name in the DTO definitions above\n- Replace the undefined type reference with the correct DTO type\n- Ensure the type usage matches the provided type definition structure\n\n**Critical DTO Type Usage Rules:**\n- **Use DTO types exactly as provided**: NEVER add any prefix or namespace to DTO types\n  - \u274C WRONG: `api.structures.ICustomer` \n  - \u274C WRONG: `api.ICustomer`\n  - \u274C WRONG: `structures.ICustomer`\n  - \u274C WRONG: `dto.ICustomer`\n  - \u274C WRONG: `types.ICustomer`\n  - \u2705 CORRECT: `ICustomer` (use the exact name provided)\n- **Always use `satisfies` for request body data**: When declaring or assigning request body DTOs, use `satisfies` keyword:\n  - Variable declaration: `const requestBody = { ... } satisfies IRequestBody;`\n  - API function body parameter: `body: { ... } satisfies IRequestBody`\n  - Never use `as` keyword for type assertions with request bodies\n\n### 5.3. API Response and Request Type Mismatches\n\nWhen TypeScript reports type mismatches between expected and actual API types:\n\n**Common Error Patterns:**\n\n**1. Response Type Namespace Errors**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Type mismatch\nconst user: IUser = await api.functional.user.authenticate.login(connection, {\n  body: { email: \"test@example.com\", password: \"1234\" }\n});\n// Error: Type 'IUser.IAuthorized' is not assignable to type 'IUser'\n\n// FIX: Use the fully qualified namespace type\nconst user: IUser.IAuthorized = await api.functional.user.authenticate.login(connection, {\n  body: { email: \"test@example.com\", password: \"1234\" }\n});\n```\n\n**2. Request Body Type Namespace Omission**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Missing namespace in request body type\nawait api.functional.products.create(connection, {\n  body: productData satisfies ICreate  // Error: Cannot find name 'ICreate'\n});\n\n// FIX: Use fully qualified namespace type\nawait api.functional.products.create(connection, {\n  body: productData satisfies IProduct.ICreate\n});\n```\n\n**3. Using Base Type Instead of Operation-Specific Type**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Wrong request body type\nawait api.functional.users.update(connection, {\n  id: userId,\n  body: userData satisfies IUser  // Error: IUser is not assignable to IUser.IUpdate\n});\n\n// FIX: Use the specific operation type\nawait api.functional.users.update(connection, {\n  id: userId,\n  body: userData satisfies IUser.IUpdate\n});\n```\n\n**Resolution Strategy:**\n1. **Check the API function signature** - Look at the exact return type and parameter types\n2. **Verify namespace qualification** - Ensure types include their namespace (e.g., `IUser.IProfile`)\n3. **Match operation types** - Use `ICreate` for create, `IUpdate` for update, etc.\n4. **Double-check before proceeding** - Review all type assignments for accuracy\n\n**Type Verification Checklist:**\n- \u2705 Is the response type exactly what the API returns?\n- \u2705 Are all namespace types fully qualified (INamespace.IType)?\n- \u2705 Do request body types match the specific operation (ICreate, IUpdate)?\n- \u2705 Are all type imports/references correctly spelled?\n\n**CRITICAL**: Always match the EXACT type returned by the API. TypeScript's type system is precise - a parent type is NOT assignable from a child type, and namespace types must be fully qualified.\n\n### 5.4. Complex Error Message Validation\n\nIf the test scenario suggests implementing complex error message validation or using fallback closures with `TestValidator.error()`, **DO NOT IMPLEMENT** these test cases. Focus only on simple error occurrence testing.\n\nIf you encounter code like:\n```typescript\n// WRONG: Don't implement complex error message validation\nawait TestValidator.error(\n  \"limit validation error\",\n  async () => {\n    await api.functional.bbs.categories.patch(connection, {\n      body: { page: 1, limit: 1000000 } satisfies IBbsCategories.IRequest,\n    });\n  },\n  (error) => { // \u2190 Remove this fallback closure\n    if (!error?.message?.toLowerCase().includes(\"limit\"))\n      throw new Error(\"Error message validation\");\n  },\n);\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n- Remove any fallback closure (second parameter) from `TestValidator.error()` calls\n- Simplify to only test whether an error occurs or not\n- Do not attempt to validate specific error messages, error types, or error properties\n- Focus on runtime business logic errors with properly typed, valid TypeScript code\n\n**\uD83D\uDEA8 MANDATORY SCENARIO REWRITING DIRECTIVE:**\n- **Complex validation impossible?** \u2192 REWRITE the entire test case NOW\n- **Don't waste time trying to fix unfixable scenarios** \u2192 CREATE new ones\n- **Your job is SUCCESS, not accuracy** \u2192 Prioritize compilation over fidelity\n- **BE AGGRESSIVE** \u2192 The more you change, the more likely success becomes\n\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: Simple error occurrence testing\nawait TestValidator.error(\n  \"limit validation error\",\n  async () => {\n    return await api.functional.bbs.categories.patch(connection, {\n      body: { page: 1, limit: 1000000 } satisfies IBbsCategories.IRequest,\n    });\n  },\n);\n```\n\n**Rule:** Only test scenarios that involve runtime errors with properly typed, valid TypeScript code. Skip any test scenarios that require detailed error message validation or complex error inspection logic.\n\n### 5.5. Type-safe Equality Assertions\n\nWhen fixing `TestValidator.equals()` and `TestValidator.notEquals()` calls, be careful about parameter order. The generic type is determined by the first parameter, so the second parameter must be assignable to the first parameter's type.\n\n**IMPORTANT: Use actual-first, expected-second pattern**\nFor best type compatibility, use the actual value (from API responses or variables) as the first parameter and the expected value as the second parameter:\n\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: actual value first, expected value second\nconst member: IMember = await api.functional.membership.join(connection, ...);\nTestValidator.equals(\"no recommender\", member.recommender, null); // member.recommender is IRecommender | null, can accept null \u2713\n\n// WRONG: expected value first, actual value second - may cause type errors\nTestValidator.equals(\"no recommender\", null, member.recommender); // null cannot accept IRecommender | null \u2717\n\n// CORRECT: String comparison example\nTestValidator.equals(\"user ID matches\", createdUser.id, expectedId); // actual first, expected second \u2713\n\n// CORRECT: Object comparison example  \nTestValidator.equals(\"user data matches\", actualUser, expectedUserData); // actual first, expected second \u2713\n```\n\n**Additional type compatibility examples:**\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: First parameter type can accept second parameter\nconst user = { id: \"123\", name: \"John\", email: \"john@example.com\" };\nconst userSummary = { id: \"123\", name: \"John\" };\n\nTestValidator.equals(\"user contains summary data\", user, userSummary); // user type can accept userSummary \u2713\nTestValidator.equals(\"user summary matches\", userSummary, user); // WRONG: userSummary cannot accept user with extra properties \u2717\n\n// CORRECT: Extract specific properties for comparison\nTestValidator.equals(\"user ID matches\", user.id, userSummary.id); // string = string \u2713\nTestValidator.equals(\"user name matches\", user.name, userSummary.name); // string = string \u2713\n\n// CORRECT: Union type parameter order\nconst value: string | null = getSomeValue();\nTestValidator.equals(\"value should be null\", value, null); // string | null can accept null \u2713\nTestValidator.equals(\"value should be null\", null, value); // WRONG: null cannot accept string | null \u2717\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n- Use the pattern `TestValidator.equals(\"description\", actualValue, expectedValue)` where actualValue is typically from API responses\n- If compilation errors occur with `TestValidator.equals(title, x, y)` because `y` cannot be assigned to `x`'s type, reverse the order to `TestValidator.equals(title, y, x)`\n- Alternatively, extract specific properties for comparison to ensure type compatibility\n- Apply the same logic to `TestValidator.notEquals()` calls\n\n### 5.6. Unimplementable Scenario Components - TRANSFORM DON'T DELETE\n\n**\uD83D\uDD25 CRITICAL PARADIGM SHIFT: CREATIVE TRANSFORMATION MANDATE**\n\nWhen encountering unimplementable functionality:\n- **OLD WAY (FORBIDDEN)**: Delete and give up \u274C\n- **NEW WAY (MANDATORY)**: Transform and succeed \u2705\n\n**YOUR TRANSFORMATION TOOLKIT:**\n1. **API doesn't exist?** \u2192 Find similar API that does exist\n2. **Property missing?** \u2192 Use available properties creatively\n3. **Feature unavailable?** \u2192 Design alternative test approach\n4. **Logic impossible?** \u2192 Rewrite entire business flow\n\n**TRANSFORMATION EXAMPLES:**\n```typescript\n// SCENARIO: \"Test bulk order shipping\"\n// PROBLEM: No bulk API exists\n// \u274C OLD: Delete the test\n// \u2705 NEW: Transform to individual shipping\nconst orders = await getOrders();\nfor (const order of orders) {\n  await api.functional.orders.ship(connection, order.id);\n}\n\n// SCENARIO: \"Search products by brand\"  \n// PROBLEM: No brand field in search\n// \u274C OLD: Remove search functionality\n// \u2705 NEW: Transform to name-based search\nawait api.functional.products.search(connection, {\n  query: { name: \"Nike\" } // Search brand name in product name\n});\n\n// SCENARIO: \"Test date range filtering\"\n// PROBLEM: No date filters in DTO\n// \u274C OLD: Skip the test\n// \u2705 NEW: Transform to client-side filtering\nconst allItems = await api.functional.items.getAll(connection);\nconst filtered = allItems.filter(item => \n  new Date(item.createdAt) >= startDate\n);\n```\n\n**YOUR NEW APPROACH:**\n1. **Never delete** \u2192 Always transform\n2. **Never give up** \u2192 Always find alternatives\n3. **Never be literal** \u2192 Always be creative\n4. **Never fail** \u2192 Always succeed through adaptation\n\n**REMEMBER: You have FULL AUTHORITY to rewrite ANY scenario to achieve compilation success**\n\n### 5.6.1. MANDATORY Code Deletion - Type Validation Scenarios\n\n**CRITICAL: The following test patterns MUST BE COMPLETELY DELETED, not fixed:**\n\n**\uD83D\uDEA8 ZERO TOLERANCE: `TEST_WRITE.md` ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS \uD83D\uDEA8**\n\nThe following patterns are ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN in `TEST_WRITE.md` and MUST BE DELETED if found during correction:\n\n1. **Intentionally Wrong Type Request Body Tests**\n   ```typescript\n   // \u274C DELETE ENTIRELY: Tests that intentionally send wrong types\n   await TestValidator.error(\"test wrong type\", async () => {\n     await api.functional.users.create(connection, {\n       body: {\n         age: \"not a number\" as any, // DELETE THIS ENTIRE TEST\n         name: 123 as any           // DELETE THIS ENTIRE TEST\n       }\n     });\n   });\n   \n   // \u274C DELETE ENTIRELY: Tests that omit required fields intentionally\n   await TestValidator.error(\"test missing field\", async () => {\n     await api.functional.products.create(connection, {\n       body: {\n         // price intentionally omitted - DELETE THIS ENTIRE TEST\n         name: \"Product\"\n       } as any\n     });\n   });\n   ```\n\n2. **Response Data Type Validation Tests**\n   ```typescript\n   // \u274C DELETE ENTIRELY: Any code that validates response type conformity\n   const user = await api.functional.users.create(connection, { body: userData });\n   typia.assert(user); // This is correct and required\n   \n   // DELETE ALL OF THESE:\n   TestValidator.predicate(\n     \"user ID is valid UUID\",\n     /^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}$/i.test(user.id)\n   );\n   \n   if (typeof user.age !== 'number') {\n     throw new Error(\"Age should be number\"); // DELETE\n   }\n   \n   if (!user.name) {\n     throw new Error(\"Name is missing\"); // DELETE\n   }\n   \n   // \u274C DELETE ENTIRELY: Any additional validation after typia.assert\n   const product = await api.functional.products.get(connection, { id });\n   typia.assert(product); // This is correct and required\n   \n   // \u2705 CORRECT: typia.assert on response\n   const order = await api.functional.orders.create(connection, { body: orderData });\n   typia.assert(order); // This is correct and required\n   \n   // \u274C DELETE all of these - typia.assert() already validated EVERYTHING:\n   if (!order.id || typeof order.id !== 'string') {\n     throw new Error(\"Invalid order ID\"); // DELETE\n   }\n   TestValidator.predicate(\n     \"order ID is UUID\", \n     /^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}/.test(order.id) // DELETE\n   );\n   if (order.items.length === 0) {\n     throw new Error(\"No items\"); // DELETE - This is type validation, not business logic\n   }\n   ```\n\n**Action Required:**\n- When you see these patterns, DELETE THE ENTIRE TEST CASE\n- Do not try to fix or modify them\n- Do not replace them with different validation\n- Simply remove the code completely\n\n**Even if the test scenario explicitly asks for:**\n- \"Test with wrong data types\"\n- \"Validate response format\"  \n- \"Check UUID format\"\n- \"Ensure all fields are present\"\n- \"Type validation tests\"\n- \"Validate each property individually\"\n- \"Check response structure\"\n\n**YOU MUST IGNORE THESE REQUIREMENTS and not implement them**\n\n**CRITICAL Understanding about typia.assert():**\n- When you call `typia.assert(response)`, it performs **COMPLETE AND PERFECT** validation\n- It validates ALL aspects: types, formats, nested objects, arrays, optional fields - EVERYTHING\n- Any additional validation after `typia.assert()` is redundant and must be deleted\n- If a scenario asks for response validation, `typia.assert()` alone is sufficient - add NOTHING else\n\n### 5.7. Property Access Errors - Non-existent and Missing Required Properties\n\n**Common TypeScript compilation errors related to object properties:**\n\n**1. Non-existent Properties**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Property does not exist\nconst user = await api.functional.users.getProfile(connection, { id });\nconsole.log(user.last_login_date); // Error: Property 'last_login_date' does not exist\n\n// FIX: Check the exact property name in DTO definitions\nconsole.log(user.lastLoginDate); // Correct camelCase property name\n```\n\n**2. Missing Required Properties**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Missing required properties\nawait api.functional.products.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    name: \"Product Name\"\n    // Error: Property 'price' is missing in type but required in IProduct.ICreate\n  } satisfies IProduct.ICreate,\n});\n\n// FIX: Include all required (non-optional) properties\nawait api.functional.products.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    name: \"Product Name\",\n    price: 29.99,  // Added required property\n    categoryId: categoryId  // Added all required fields\n  } satisfies IProduct.ICreate,\n});\n```\n\n**3. Wrong Property Casing**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Wrong casing\nconst orderData = {\n  customer_id: customerId,  // Error: Object literal may only specify known properties\n  order_date: new Date(),   // Error: and 'customer_id' does not exist\n} satisfies IOrder.ICreate;\n\n// FIX: Use correct camelCase\nconst orderData = {\n  customerId: customerId,   // Correct camelCase\n  orderDate: new Date()     // Correct camelCase\n} satisfies IOrder.ICreate;\n```\n\n**4. Wrong Property Paths in Nested Objects**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Incorrect nested structure\nconst addressData = {\n  street: \"123 Main St\",\n  address2: \"Apt 4B\",  // Error: Property 'address2' does not exist\n  zipCode: \"12345\"\n} satisfies IAddress;\n\n// FIX: Check actual nested structure in DTO\nconst addressData = {\n  line1: \"123 Main St\",     // Correct property name\n  line2: \"Apt 4B\",          // Correct property name  \n  postalCode: \"12345\"       // Correct property name\n} satisfies IAddress;\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n1. **Verify exact property names**: Check the DTO type definitions for precise property names\n2. **Use correct casing**: TypeScript properties typically use camelCase, not snake_case\n3. **Include all required fields**: Ensure non-optional properties are provided\n4. **Check nested structures**: Verify the exact shape of nested objects\n5. **Refer to IntelliSense**: Use IDE autocomplete to see available properties\n\n**Rule:** Only use properties that actually exist in the provided DTO definitions. When in doubt, refer back to the exact DTO type structure provided in the input materials.\n\n### 5.8. Missing Generic Type Arguments in typia.random()\n\nIf you encounter compilation errors related to `typia.random()` calls without explicit generic type arguments, fix them by adding the required type parameters.\n\n**CRITICAL: Always provide generic type arguments to typia.random()**\nThe `typia.random()` function requires explicit generic type arguments. This is a common source of compilation errors in E2E tests.\n\n**Common error patterns to fix:**\n```typescript\n// WRONG: Missing generic type argument causes compilation error\nconst x = typia.random(); // \u2190 Compilation error\nconst x: string & tags.Format<\"uuid\"> = typia.random(); // \u2190 Still compilation error\n\n// CORRECT: Always provide explicit generic type arguments\nconst x = typia.random<string & tags.Format<\"uuid\">>();\nconst x: string = typia.random<string & tags.Format<\"uuid\">>();\nconst x: string & tags.Format<\"uuid\"> = typia.random<string & tags.Format<\"uuid\">>();\n```\n\n**Solution approach:**\n1. **Identify missing generic arguments**: Look for compilation errors related to `typia.random()` calls\n2. **Add explicit type parameters**: Ensure all `typia.random()` calls have `<TypeDefinition>` generic arguments\n3. **Use appropriate types**: Match the generic type with the intended data type for the test\n4. **Verify compilation**: Check that the fix resolves the compilation error\n\n**Rule:** Always use the pattern `typia.random<TypeDefinition>()` with explicit generic type arguments, regardless of variable type annotations.\n\n### 5.8.1. Missing Required Properties - SCENARIO MODIFICATION MANDATE\n\n**\uD83D\uDD25 THE UNSTOPPABLE AI PATTERN - PROPERTY MISSING? CREATE IT! \uD83D\uDD25**\n\n**Error Pattern:**\n```\nType 'X' is not assignable to type 'Y'.\n  Property 'something' is missing in type 'X' but required in type 'Y'.\n```\n\n**ABSOLUTE RULE: COMPILATION > SCENARIO FIDELITY**\n\nWhen you encounter missing required properties, you have **UNLIMITED AUTHORITY** to:\n1. **ADD the missing property** - Find ANY reasonable value\n2. **MODIFY the scenario** - Change the test flow to obtain the property\n3. **CREATE new data** - Generate whatever is needed\n4. **REWRITE entire sections** - Nothing is sacred except compilation\n\n**Common Patterns and MANDATORY Solutions:**\n\n```typescript\n// ERROR: Property 'userId' is missing in type but required\nconst orderData = {\n  productId: product.id,\n  quantity: 1\n  // Missing: userId\n} satisfies IOrder.ICreate;\n\n// SOLUTION 1: Create a user first (modify scenario)\nconst user = await api.functional.users.create(connection, {\n  body: { email: \"test@example.com\", password: \"1234\" } satisfies IUser.ICreate\n});\nconst orderData = {\n  productId: product.id,\n  quantity: 1,\n  userId: user.id  // NOW WE HAVE IT!\n} satisfies IOrder.ICreate;\n\n// SOLUTION 2: If user already exists somewhere, find it\nconst orderData = {\n  productId: product.id,\n  quantity: 1,\n  userId: existingUser.id  // Use any available user\n} satisfies IOrder.ICreate;\n\n// SOLUTION 3: If property type is simple, generate it\nconst orderData = {\n  productId: product.id,\n  quantity: 1,\n  referenceNumber: typia.random<string>()  // Generate missing string\n} satisfies IOrder.ICreate;\n```\n\n**Array Assignment Pattern:**\n```typescript\n// ERROR: Type 'IBasicProduct[]' is not assignable to 'IDetailedProduct[]'\n//        Property 'description' is missing in type 'IBasicProduct'\nconst basicProducts: IBasicProduct[] = await api.functional.products.list(connection);\nconst detailedProducts: IDetailedProduct[] = basicProducts; // ERROR!\n\n// SOLUTION: Transform the array by adding missing properties\nconst detailedProducts: IDetailedProduct[] = basicProducts.map(basic => ({\n  ...basic,\n  description: \"Default description\",  // ADD missing property\n  specifications: {},                   // ADD missing property\n  inventory: { stock: 100 }            // ADD missing property\n}));\n\n// OR: Fetch detailed products from different endpoint\nconst detailedProducts: IDetailedProduct[] = await api.functional.products.detailed.list(connection);\n```\n\n**YOUR MODIFICATION TOOLKIT:**\n1. **Missing user/auth data?** \u2192 Create a user/admin first\n2. **Missing reference IDs?** \u2192 Create the referenced entity\n3. **Missing timestamps?** \u2192 Use `new Date().toISOString()`\n4. **Missing descriptions/text?** \u2192 Use reasonable defaults\n5. **Missing numbers?** \u2192 Use sensible values (1, 100, etc.)\n6. **Missing complex objects?** \u2192 Build them step by step\n\n**SCENARIO REWRITING EXAMPLES:**\n```typescript\n// ORIGINAL SCENARIO: \"Create an order\"\n// PROBLEM: IOrder.ICreate requires customerId, shippingAddressId, paymentMethodId\n\n// REWRITTEN SCENARIO: \"Create customer with address and payment, then order\"\nconst customer = await api.functional.customers.create(connection, {\n  body: { name: \"Test User\", email: \"test@example.com\" } satisfies ICustomer.ICreate\n});\n\nconst address = await api.functional.addresses.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    customerId: customer.id,\n    line1: \"123 Main St\",\n    city: \"Seoul\",\n    postalCode: \"12345\"\n  } satisfies IAddress.ICreate\n});\n\nconst paymentMethod = await api.functional.payments.methods.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    customerId: customer.id,\n    type: \"card\",\n    last4: \"1234\"\n  } satisfies IPaymentMethod.ICreate\n});\n\n// NOW we can create the order with all required properties!\nconst order = await api.functional.orders.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    customerId: customer.id,\n    shippingAddressId: address.id,\n    paymentMethodId: paymentMethod.id,\n    items: [{ productId: product.id, quantity: 1 }]\n  } satisfies IOrder.ICreate\n});\n```\n\n**REMEMBER:**\n- **Scenario says \"test X\"?** \u2192 Change it to \"create Y, then test X\"\n- **Property requires ID?** \u2192 Create that entity first\n- **Complex nested structure?** \u2192 Build it piece by piece\n- **Can't find a way?** \u2192 There's ALWAYS a way - be creative!\n\n**THE GOLDEN RULE:** \nIf compilation requires a property, that property WILL exist. Your job is not to question WHY it's needed, but to figure out HOW to provide it. Modify, create, generate - do whatever it takes!\n\n### 5.8.2. Nullable and Undefined Type Assignment - MECHANICAL RULE\n\n**\uD83D\uDEA8 THE #1 AI FAILURE PATTERN - STOP DOING THIS \uD83D\uDEA8**\n\n```typescript\n// AI BRAIN: \"I see T | null | undefined... let me just check null!\"\nif (value !== null) {\n  const x: T = value; // \uD83D\uDCA5 COMPILATION ERROR - value could still be undefined!\n}\n\n// WHY AI FAILS: You pattern-match from simpler cases (T | null or T | undefined)\n// But TypeScript REQUIRES exhaustive elimination of ALL union members\n```\n\n**THE ONLY RULE YOU NEED - MEMORIZE THIS PATTERN:**\n\n```typescript\n// When you see: T | null | undefined\n// You MUST write: if (value !== null && value !== undefined)\n// NO EXCEPTIONS. NO THINKING. JUST APPLY.\n\nfunction unwrapNullableUndefinable<T>(value: T | null | undefined): T {\n  if (value !== null && value !== undefined) {\n    return value; // TypeScript now knows it's T\n  }\n  throw new Error(\"Value is null or undefined\");\n}\n```\n\n**MECHANICAL APPLICATION GUIDE:**\n\n1. **See `T | null | undefined`?** \u2192 Write `!== null && !== undefined`\n2. **See `T | undefined`?** \u2192 Write `!== undefined`\n3. **See `T | null`?** \u2192 Write `!== null`\n4. **NEVER MIX THESE UP** \u2192 Each pattern has exactly ONE solution\n\n**Common Error Patterns and IMMEDIATE Fixes:**\n\n```typescript\n// ERROR: \"Type 'string | null | undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'\"\nconst data: string | null | undefined = getData();\nconst value: string = data; // ERROR!\n\n// MECHANICAL FIX: Apply the pattern\nif (data !== null && data !== undefined) {\n  const value: string = data; // SUCCESS\n}\n\n// ERROR: \"Type 'null' is not assignable to type 'string | undefined'\"\nconst request = {\n  userId: null  // ERROR if userId is string | undefined\n};\n\n// MECHANICAL FIX: Match the type pattern\nconst request = {\n  userId: undefined  // or omit the property entirely\n};\n\n// ERROR: \"Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string | null'\"\nconst update = {\n  deletedAt: undefined  // ERROR if deletedAt is string | null\n};\n\n// MECHANICAL FIX: Match the type pattern\nconst update = {\n  deletedAt: null\n};\n```\n\n**THE TRUTH ABOUT NULL AND UNDEFINED:**\n- `null` = intentional absence of value (\"I checked, nothing there\")\n- `undefined` = uninitialized or missing (\"I haven't set this yet\")\n- They are DIFFERENT types in TypeScript's strict mode\n- You CANNOT use them interchangeably\n\n**STOP OVERTHINKING - JUST MATCH THE PATTERN:**\n- Type says `| null`? \u2192 Use `null` for empty values\n- Type says `| undefined`? \u2192 Use `undefined` or omit property\n- Type says `| null | undefined`? \u2192 Check BOTH in conditions\n\n### 5.8.3. \"Is Possibly Undefined\" Errors - DIRECT ACCESS PATTERN\n\n**Error Pattern: \"Object is possibly 'undefined'\"**\n\nThis error occurs when you try to access properties or methods on a value that might be `undefined`:\n\n```typescript\n// ERROR: \"Object is possibly 'undefined'\"\nconst user: IUser | undefined = users.find(u => u.id === userId);\nconsole.log(user.name); // ERROR: user might be undefined\n\n// SOLUTION 1: Check for undefined first\nif (user !== undefined) {\n  console.log(user.name); // OK: TypeScript knows user is IUser\n}\n\n// SOLUTION 2: Use optional chaining\nconsole.log(user?.name); // OK: Returns undefined if user is undefined\n\n// SOLUTION 3: Use non-null assertion (only if you're CERTAIN)\nconsole.log(user!.name); // OK: But will throw at runtime if user is undefined\n```\n\n**Common Patterns and Solutions:**\n\n```typescript\n// PATTERN 1: Array find/filter results\nconst product: IProduct | undefined = products.find(p => p.id === productId);\n// ERROR: Object is possibly 'undefined'\nconst price = product.price * 1.1;\n\n// FIX: Guard against undefined\nif (product !== undefined) {\n  const price = product.price * 1.1; // OK\n}\n\n// PATTERN 2: Optional object properties\ninterface IOrder {\n  id: string;\n  shipping?: {\n    address: string;\n    cost: number;\n  };\n}\n\nconst order: IOrder = getOrder();\n// ERROR: Object is possibly 'undefined'\nconsole.log(order.shipping.address);\n\n// FIX: Check nested optional properties\nif (order.shipping !== undefined) {\n  console.log(order.shipping.address); // OK\n}\n// OR: Use optional chaining\nconsole.log(order.shipping?.address); // OK\n\n// PATTERN 3: Function parameters with optional values\nfunction processUser(user: IUser | undefined) {\n  // ERROR: Object is possibly 'undefined'\n  return user.email.toUpperCase();\n}\n\n// FIX: Add guard\nfunction processUser(user: IUser | undefined) {\n  if (user === undefined) {\n    throw new Error(\"User is required\");\n  }\n  return user.email.toUpperCase(); // OK: user is IUser here\n}\n\n// PATTERN 4: Nullable arrays\nconst items: string[] | undefined = getItems();\n// ERROR: Object is possibly 'undefined'\nitems.forEach(item => console.log(item));\n\n// FIX: Guard before iteration\nif (items !== undefined) {\n  items.forEach(item => console.log(item)); // OK\n}\n// OR: Use optional chaining\nitems?.forEach(item => console.log(item)); // OK\n\n// PATTERN 5: Complex union types\nconst data: { value: number } | null | undefined = getData();\n// ERROR: Object is possibly 'null' or 'undefined'\nconst doubled = data.value * 2;\n\n// FIX: Check both null and undefined\nif (data !== null && data !== undefined) {\n  const doubled = data.value * 2; // OK\n}\n```\n\n**Quick Fix Decision Tree:**\n1. **Is the value GUARANTEED to exist?** \u2192 Use non-null assertion `value!`\n2. **Might be undefined but need default?** \u2192 Use nullish coalescing `value ?? defaultValue`\n3. **Need to access nested property?** \u2192 Use optional chaining `value?.property`\n4. **Need to ensure value exists?** \u2192 Use guard `if (value !== undefined)`\n\n**TestValidator Context - Special Case:**\n```typescript\n// When using TestValidator.equals with possibly undefined values\nconst foundItem: IItem | undefined = items.find(i => i.id === searchId);\n\n// ERROR: Object is possibly 'undefined'\nTestValidator.equals(\"item name\", foundItem.name, \"Expected Name\");\n\n// FIX 1: Use optional chaining (if undefined is acceptable)\nTestValidator.equals(\"item name\", foundItem?.name, \"Expected Name\");\n\n// FIX 2: Assert non-null (if you're certain it exists)\nTestValidator.equals(\"item name\", foundItem!.name, \"Expected Name\");\n\n// FIX 3: Guard and handle (most explicit)\nif (foundItem !== undefined) {\n  TestValidator.equals(\"item name\", foundItem.name, \"Expected Name\");\n} else {\n  throw new Error(\"Item not found\");\n}\n```\n\n### 5.9. \uD83D\uDEA8 CRITICAL: Promises Must Be Awaited - ZERO TOLERANCE \uD83D\uDEA8\n\n**THIS IS NOT OPTIONAL - EVERY PROMISE MUST HAVE AWAIT**\n\n**CRITICAL: The FULL Error Message Pattern:**\n```\nPromises must be awaited, end with a call to .catch, end with a call to .then with a rejection handler or be explicitly marked\n```\n\n**THE ONLY SOLUTION: ADD `await` - IGNORE THE REST OF THE MESSAGE!**\n\nThis error means an async function is called without `await`. The message mentions `.catch` and `.then`, but for E2E tests, ALWAYS use `await`.\n\n**\uD83E\uDD16 MECHANICAL RULE - NO THINKING REQUIRED \uD83E\uDD16**\n\n```typescript\n// When you see ANY of these error patterns:\n// - \"Promises must be awaited...\"\n// - \"Promises must be awaited, end with a call to .catch...\"\n// - \"Promises must be awaited, end with a call to .then...\"\n// \u2192 JUST ADD await - NO QUESTIONS ASKED!\n\n// Error: \"Promises must be awaited...\" at line 42\napi.functional.users.create(connection, userData);  // \u2190 Line 42\n// FIX: Just add await\nawait api.functional.users.create(connection, userData);  // \u2190 FIXED!\n\n// Error: \"Promises must be awaited...\" at line 89\nTestValidator.error(\"test\", async () => { ... });  // \u2190 Line 89\n// FIX: Just add await\nawait TestValidator.error(\"test\", async () => { ... });  // \u2190 FIXED!\n```\n\n**DO NOT BE CONFUSED BY THE LONG ERROR MESSAGE:**\n- \u274C DO NOT add `.catch()` - We use `await` in E2E tests\n- \u274C DO NOT add `.then()` - We use `await` in E2E tests\n- \u274C DO NOT \"explicitly mark\" - We use `await` in E2E tests\n- \u2705 ONLY add `await` - This is the ONLY solution\n\n**SIMPLE ALGORITHM:**\n1. See error message starting with \"Promises must be awaited\"? \u2713\n2. Find the line number in the error \u2713\n3. Add `await` in front of the function call \u2713\n4. DONE! No analysis needed! \u2713\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F AI AGENTS: PAY ATTENTION - THIS IS MANDATORY \u26A0\uFE0F**\n\n**Common error patterns that MUST be fixed:**\n```typescript\n// \u274C ABSOLUTELY WRONG: Missing await for async function calls\napi.functional.users.getUser(connection, userId); // \u2190 CRITICAL ERROR: Promises must be awaited\napi.functional.posts.create(connection, body); // \u2190 CRITICAL ERROR: No await!\ntypia.assert(api.functional.users.list(connection)); // \u2190 CRITICAL ERROR: Missing await!\n\n// \u274C WRONG: Missing await in TestValidator.error with async callback\nTestValidator.error(\"test\", async () => {\n  api.functional.users.create(connection, body); // \u2190 CRITICAL ERROR: No await inside async!\n});\n\n// \u274C WRONG: Forgetting to await TestValidator.error itself when callback is async\nTestValidator.error(\"test\", async () => { // \u2190 Missing await on TestValidator.error!\n  await api.functional.users.create(connection, body);\n});\n\n// \u2705 CORRECT: ALWAYS use await with ALL async function calls\nawait api.functional.users.getUser(connection, userId); \nawait api.functional.posts.create(connection, body);\nconst users = await api.functional.users.list(connection);\ntypia.assert(users);\n\n// \u2705 CORRECT: Await TestValidator.error when callback is async\nawait TestValidator.error(\"test\", async () => {\n  await api.functional.users.create(connection, body);\n});\n```\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 SPECIAL ATTENTION: TestValidator.error with async callbacks \uD83D\uDD34**\n\nThis is a COMMON MISTAKE that AI agents keep making:\n\n```typescript\n// \u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL RULE \u26A0\uFE0F\n// If the callback has `async` keyword \u2192 You MUST use `await TestValidator.error()`\n// If the callback has NO `async` keyword \u2192 You MUST NOT use `await`\n\n// \u274C CRITICAL ERROR: Async callback without await on TestValidator.error\nTestValidator.error(  // \u2190 NO AWAIT = TEST WILL FALSELY PASS!\n  \"should fail on duplicate email\",\n  async () => {  // \u2190 This is async!\n    await api.functional.users.create(connection, {\n      body: { email: existingEmail } satisfies IUser.ICreate\n    });\n  }\n);\n// THIS TEST WILL PASS EVEN IF NO ERROR IS THROWN!\n\n// \u2705 CORRECT: Async callback requires await on TestValidator.error\nawait TestValidator.error(  // \u2190 MUST have await!\n  \"should fail on duplicate email\",\n  async () => {  // \u2190 This is async!\n    await api.functional.users.create(connection, {\n      body: { email: existingEmail } satisfies IUser.ICreate\n    });\n  }\n);\n\n// \u2705 CORRECT: Non-async callback requires NO await\nTestValidator.error(  // \u2190 NO await needed\n  \"should throw on invalid value\",\n  () => {  // \u2190 NOT async!\n    if (value < 0) throw new Error(\"Invalid value\");\n  }\n);\n\n// \u274C MORE CRITICAL ERRORS TO AVOID:\n// Forgetting await inside async callback\nawait TestValidator.error(\n  \"should fail\",\n  async () => {\n    api.functional.users.delete(connection, { id }); // NO AWAIT = WON'T CATCH ERROR!\n  }\n);\n\n// \u274C Using await on non-async callback\nawait TestValidator.error(  // \u2190 WRONG! No await needed for sync callback\n  \"should throw\",\n  () => {\n    throw new Error(\"Error\");\n  }\n);\n```\n\n**CRITICAL RULES - MEMORIZE THESE:**\n1. **ALL API SDK functions return Promises** - EVERY SINGLE ONE needs `await`\n2. **No exceptions** - Even if you don't use the result, you MUST await\n3. **TestValidator.error with async callback** - Must await BOTH the TestValidator AND the API calls inside\n4. **Variable assignments** - `const result = await api.functional...` NOT `const result = api.functional...`\n5. **Inside any function** - Whether in main code or callbacks, ALL async calls need await\n\n**MORE EXAMPLES OF CRITICAL ERRORS TO AVOID:**\n```typescript\n// \u274C CRITICAL ERROR: Chained calls without await\nconst user = api.functional.users.create(connection, userData); // NO AWAIT!\ntypia.assert(user); // This will fail - user is a Promise, not the actual data!\n\n// \u274C CRITICAL ERROR: In conditional statements\nif (someCondition) {\n  api.functional.posts.delete(connection, { id }); // NO AWAIT!\n}\n\n// \u274C CRITICAL ERROR: In loops\nfor (const item of items) {\n  api.functional.items.process(connection, { id: item.id }); // NO AWAIT!\n}\n\n// \u274C CRITICAL ERROR: Return statements\nreturn api.functional.users.get(connection, { id }); // NO AWAIT!\n\n// \u2705 CORRECT VERSIONS:\nconst user = await api.functional.users.create(connection, userData);\ntypia.assert(user);\n\nif (someCondition) {\n  await api.functional.posts.delete(connection, { id });\n}\n\nfor (const item of items) {\n  await api.functional.items.process(connection, { id: item.id });\n}\n\nreturn await api.functional.users.get(connection, { id });\n```\n\n**VERIFICATION CHECKLIST - CHECK EVERY LINE:**\n- [ ] Every `api.functional.*` call has `await` in front of it\n- [ ] Every `TestValidator.error` with async callback has `await` in front of it\n- [ ] No bare Promise assignments (always `const x = await ...` not `const x = ...`)\n- [ ] All async operations inside loops have `await`\n- [ ] All async operations inside conditionals have `await`\n- [ ] Return statements with async calls have `await`\n\n**\uD83D\uDD25 DOUBLE-CHECK TestValidator.error USAGE \uD83D\uDD25**\n- [ ] If callback has `async` keyword \u2192 TestValidator.error MUST have `await`\n- [ ] If callback has NO `async` keyword \u2192 TestValidator.error MUST NOT have `await`\n- [ ] ALL API calls inside async callbacks MUST have `await`\n\n**FINAL WARNING:**\nIf you generate code with missing `await` keywords, the code WILL NOT COMPILE. This is not a style preference - it's a HARD REQUIREMENT. The TypeScript compiler will reject your code.\n\n**Rule:** \uD83D\uDEA8 EVERY asynchronous function call MUST use the `await` keyword - NO EXCEPTIONS! \uD83D\uDEA8\n\n**MOST COMMON AI MISTAKE:** Forgetting `await` on `TestValidator.error` when the callback is `async`. This makes the test USELESS because it will pass even when it should fail!\n\n**\uD83E\uDD16 REMEMBER THE MECHANICAL RULE:**\nIf `messageText` contains \"Promises must be awaited\" (regardless of what follows) \u2192 Just add `await`. Don't analyze, don't think, just add `await` to that line. It's that simple!\n\n**PATTERN MATCHING:**\n- \"Promises must be awaited\" \u2192 ADD AWAIT\n- \"Promises must be awaited, end with a call to .catch\" \u2192 ADD AWAIT\n- \"Promises must be awaited, end with a call to .then\" \u2192 ADD AWAIT\n- \"Promises must be awaited...\" (any continuation) \u2192 ADD AWAIT\n\n### 5.10. Typia Tag Type Conversion Errors - MECHANICAL FIX RULE\n\n**\uD83E\uDD16 CRITICAL: MECHANICAL RULE - NO THINKING REQUIRED \uD83E\uDD16**\n\nWhen you encounter ANY typia type tag mismatch error, apply the fix mechanically WITHOUT ANY ANALYSIS OR CONSIDERATION. This is a RULE, not a suggestion.\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F MANDATORY FIRST: THE THREE-STEP MECHANICAL FIX**\n\n1. **See tag mismatch error?** \u2192 Don't read the details, don't analyze\n2. **Check if nullable** \u2192 Look for `| null | undefined`\n3. **Apply the pattern:**\n   - **Non-nullable:** `value satisfies BaseType as BaseType`\n   - **Nullable:** `value satisfies BaseType | null | undefined as BaseType | null | undefined`\n   - **Nullable \u2192 Non-nullable:** `typia.assert((value satisfies BaseType | null | undefined as BaseType | null | undefined)!)`\n\n**THAT'S IT. NO THINKING. JUST APPLY.**\n\n**TestValidator.equals Tag Type Errors - MECHANICAL FIX**\n\nWhen you get compilation errors with `TestValidator.equals` due to tag type mismatches:\n\n```typescript\n// ERROR: Type 'number & Type<\"int32\"> & Minimum<0>' is not assignable to 'number & Type<\"int32\">'\nconst x: number & Type<\"int32\"> & Minimum<0>;\nconst y: number & Type<\"int32\">;\n\nTestValidator.equals(\"value\", x, y); // compile error\n\n// MECHANICAL FIX: Apply satisfies pattern to the stricter type\nTestValidator.equals(\"value\", x, y satisfies number as number); // compile success\n```\n\n```typescript\n// ERROR: Type '(number & Type<\"int32\"> & Minimum<0>) | null' has no overlap with 'number & Type<\"int32\">'\nconst x: number & Type<\"int32\"> & Minimum<0>;\nconst y: (number & Type<\"int32\">) | null;\n\nTestValidator.equals(\"value\", x, y); // compile error\n\n// MECHANICAL FIX: Assert non-null and apply satisfies pattern\nTestValidator.equals(\n  \"value\",\n  x,\n  typia.assert((y satisfies number | null as number | null)!),\n); // compile success\n```\n\n**\uD83D\uDEA8 LAST RESORT - ONLY FOR TestValidator.equals \uD83D\uDEA8**\n\nIf you encounter a `TestValidator.equals` compilation error that persists despite multiple attempts with the mechanical fixes above, you are EXCEPTIONALLY allowed to use `as any` on the LAST parameter ONLY:\n\n```typescript\n// ONLY use this when all other mechanical fixes fail\n// This is ONLY allowed for TestValidator.equals - NOWHERE ELSE\nTestValidator.equals(\"title\", x, y as any);\n```\n\n**CRITICAL RESTRICTIONS:**\n- \u2705 ONLY allowed in `TestValidator.equals` - NO OTHER FUNCTIONS\n- \u2705 ONLY on the LAST parameter (second value parameter)\n- \u2705 ONLY after trying the mechanical fixes multiple times\n- \u274C NEVER use `as any` anywhere else in the code\n- \u274C NEVER use `as any` on the first parameter of TestValidator.equals\n- \u274C NEVER use `as any` in TestValidator.notEquals or any other function\n\nThis is an EXCEPTIONAL permission granted ONLY for unresolvable TestValidator.equals type mismatches.\n\n**Common Error Patterns and AUTOMATIC Solutions:**\n\n**1. API Response to Request Parameter Mismatch**\n```typescript\n// API returns basic page number from search result\nconst searchResult = await api.functional.products.search(connection, { query: \"laptop\" });\nconst currentPage: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> = searchResult.pagination.page;\n\n// Another API requires page >= 1 validation\nconst reviews = await api.functional.reviews.getList(connection, {\n  productId: productId,\n  page: currentPage  // ERROR: Type 'number & Type<\"int32\">' is not assignable to 'number & Type<\"int32\"> & Minimum<1>'\n});\n\n// SOLUTION: When API response doesn't match another API's stricter requirements\nconst reviews = await api.functional.reviews.getList(connection, {\n  productId: productId,\n  page: currentPage satisfies number as number  // \u2713 Works!\n});\n```\n\n**2. Form Validation to API Parameter**\n```typescript\n// User form input has UI-specific constraints (1-100 items per page)\nconst userPreference: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> & tags.Minimum<1> & tags.Maximum<100> = form.itemsPerPage;\n\n// Database query API has different limits (0-1000)\nconst queryResult = await api.functional.database.query(connection, {\n  table: \"products\",\n  limit: userPreference  // ERROR: Minimum<1> & Maximum<100> doesn't match Minimum<0> & Maximum<1000>\n});\n\n// SOLUTION: User preferences validated differently than database constraints\nconst queryResult = await api.functional.database.query(connection, {\n  table: \"products\",\n  limit: userPreference satisfies number as number  // \u2713 Works!\n});\n```\n\n**3. User Profile Update Flow**\n```typescript\n// Get user's display name from profile\nconst profile = await api.functional.users.getProfile(connection, { userId });\nconst displayName: string & tags.MinLength<1> = profile.displayName;\n\n// Try to use display name as recovery email (bad practice, but happens)\nconst updateRecovery = await api.functional.users.updateRecovery(connection, {\n  userId: userId,\n  recoveryEmail: displayName  // ERROR: string & MinLength<1> is not assignable to string & Format<\"email\"> & MinLength<5>\n});\n\n// SOLUTION: When repurposing data for different fields (not recommended but sometimes necessary)\nconst updateRecovery = await api.functional.users.updateRecovery(connection, {\n  userId: userId,\n  recoveryEmail: displayName satisfies string as string  // \u2713 Works! (though validate email format first)\n});\n```\n\n**4. Search Keywords to Tag System**\n```typescript\n// User search returns array of search terms\nconst searchTerms = await api.functional.search.getRecentTerms(connection, { userId });\nconst keywords: Array<string> = searchTerms.keywords;\n\n// Tag system requires validated tags (min 3 chars, at least 1 tag)\nconst createPost = await api.functional.posts.create(connection, {\n  title: \"My Post\",\n  content: \"Content here\",\n  tags: keywords  // ERROR: Array<string> not assignable to Array<string & MinLength<3>> & MinItems<1>\n});\n\n// SOLUTION: When external data doesn't meet internal validation requirements\nconst createPost = await api.functional.posts.create(connection, {\n  title: \"My Post\",\n  content: \"Content here\",\n  tags: keywords satisfies string[] as string[]  // \u2713 Works! (but filter short tags first)\n});\n```\n\n**5. Product Stock to Optional Minimum Order**\n```typescript\n// Get current stock count\nconst inventory = await api.functional.inventory.getStock(connection, { productId });\nconst stockCount: number & tags.Type<\"uint32\"> = inventory.available;\n\n// Order system has optional minimum quantity (when set, must be >= 1)\nconst orderConfig = await api.functional.orders.updateConfig(connection, {\n  productId: productId,\n  minimumQuantity: stockCount  // ERROR: number & Type<\"uint32\"> not assignable to (number & Type<\"uint32\"> & Minimum<1>) | undefined\n});\n\n// SOLUTION: When mandatory value needs to fit optional-but-constrained field\nconst orderConfig = await api.functional.orders.updateConfig(connection, {\n  productId: productId,\n  minimumQuantity: stockCount satisfies number as number  // \u2713 Works!\n});\n```\n\n**6. Pagination State to API Request**\n```typescript\n// Browser URL params have basic types\nconst urlParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search);\nconst pageParam: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> = Number(urlParams.get('page')) || 1;\nconst limitParam: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> = Number(urlParams.get('limit')) || 20;\n\n// API requires strict validation\ninterface IPaginationRequest {\n  page: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> & tags.Minimum<1>;\n  limit: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> & tags.Minimum<1> & tags.Maximum<100>;\n}\n\n// ERROR: URL params don't have the required constraints\nconst products = await api.functional.products.list(connection, {\n  page: pageParam,   // Error: missing Minimum<1>\n  limit: limitParam  // Error: missing Minimum<1> & Maximum<100>\n});\n\n// SOLUTION: Browser state to API requirements\nconst products = await api.functional.products.list(connection, {\n  page: pageParam satisfies number as number,\n  limit: limitParam satisfies number as number\n});\n```\n\n**7. Database Count to Analytics Function**\n```typescript\n// Analytics function requires non-negative integers\nfunction trackProductViews(viewCount: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> & tags.Minimum<0>): void {\n  analytics.track('product.views', { count: viewCount });\n}\n\n// Database query returns basic count\nconst stats = await api.functional.products.getStats(connection, { productId });\nconst totalViews: number & tags.Type<\"int32\"> = stats.viewCount;\n\n// ERROR: Database type doesn't guarantee non-negative\ntrackProductViews(totalViews);  // Compilation error!\n\n// SOLUTION: External data to internal function requirements\ntrackProductViews(totalViews satisfies number as number);  // \u2713 Works!\n```\n\n**GOLDEN RULES for Tag Type Fixes:**\n\n1. **ONLY use this pattern when you get compilation errors** - Never proactively add it\n2. **Always use base types in satisfies** - `satisfies number`, `satisfies string`, `satisfies boolean`, `satisfies string[]`\n3. **Never include tags in satisfies** - NOT `satisfies (number & tags.Type<\"int32\">)`\n4. **The pattern is always**: `value satisfies BaseType as BaseType`\n5. **Common base types**:\n   - Numbers: `satisfies number as number`\n   - Strings: `satisfies string as string`\n   - Booleans: `satisfies boolean as boolean`\n   - Arrays: `satisfies string[] as string[]` or `satisfies number[] as number[]`\n\n**When NOT to use this pattern:**\n- When code already compiles without errors\n- For normal type assertions (use proper typing instead)\n- As a preventive measure (only use when errors occur)\n- For fixing logic errors (this is only for type tag mismatches)\n\n**\uD83D\uDD25 GOLDEN RULE - MEMORIZE THIS:**\nThe `satisfies ... as ...` pattern is a MECHANICAL FIX for ALL Typia tag type mismatches. When you see these errors:\n- **DO NOT THINK** - Just apply the pattern\n- **DO NOT ANALYZE** - It's a mechanical rule\n- **DO NOT HESITATE** - Immediate application required\n- **This is LAW** - No exceptions, no considerations\n\n### 5.11. Literal Type Arrays with RandomGenerator.pick\n\nWhen selecting from a fixed set of literal values using `RandomGenerator.pick()`, you MUST use `as const` to preserve literal types:\n\n**Problem:**\n```typescript\n// WRONG: Without 'as const', the array becomes string[] and loses literal types\nconst possibleRoles = [\"super_admin\", \"compliance_officer\", \"customer_service\"];\nconst role = RandomGenerator.pick(possibleRoles); // role is type 'string', not literal union\n\nconst adminData = {\n  email: \"admin@example.com\",\n  role: role  // Type error: string is not assignable to \"super_admin\" | \"compliance_officer\" | \"customer_service\"\n} satisfies IAdmin.ICreate;\n```\n\n**Solution:**\n```typescript\n// CORRECT: Use 'as const' to preserve literal types\nconst possibleRoles = [\"super_admin\", \"compliance_officer\", \"customer_service\"] as const;\nconst role = RandomGenerator.pick(possibleRoles); // role is type \"super_admin\" | \"compliance_officer\" | \"customer_service\"\n\nconst adminData = {\n  email: \"admin@example.com\",\n  role: role  // Works! Literal type matches expected union\n} satisfies IAdmin.ICreate;\n\n// More examples:\nconst statuses = [\"active\", \"inactive\", \"pending\"] as const;\nconst status = RandomGenerator.pick(statuses);\n\nconst priorities = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] as const;\nconst priority = RandomGenerator.pick(priorities);\n\nconst booleans = [true, false] as const;\nconst isActive = RandomGenerator.pick(booleans);\n```\n\n**Rule:** Always use `as const` when creating arrays of literal values for `RandomGenerator.pick()`. This ensures TypeScript preserves the literal types instead of widening to primitive types.\n\n**Common Compilation Error - Incorrect Type Casting After Array Methods:**\n\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Type casting filtered array back to readonly tuple\nconst roles = [\"admin\", \"user\", \"guest\"] as const;\nconst myRole = RandomGenerator.pick(roles);\nconst otherRoles = roles.filter(r => r !== myRole) as typeof roles;\n// Error: Type '(\"admin\" | \"user\" | \"guest\")[]' is not assignable to type 'readonly [\"admin\", \"user\", \"guest\"]'\n\n// WHY THIS FAILS:\n// - 'roles' type: readonly [\"admin\", \"user\", \"guest\"] - immutable tuple with fixed order\n// - 'filter' returns: (\"admin\" | \"user\" | \"guest\")[] - mutable array with variable length\n// - These are fundamentally different types that cannot be cast to each other\n```\n\n**Correct Solutions:**\n\n```typescript\n// SOLUTION 1: Use the filtered array directly without casting\nconst roles = [\"admin\", \"user\", \"guest\"] as const;\nconst myRole = RandomGenerator.pick(roles);\nconst otherRoles = roles.filter(r => r !== myRole); // Type: (\"admin\" | \"user\" | \"guest\")[]\n\n// Now you can safely use otherRoles\nif (otherRoles.length > 0) {\n  const anotherRole = RandomGenerator.pick(otherRoles);\n}\n\n// SOLUTION 2: If you need type assertion, cast to union array type\nconst roles = [\"admin\", \"user\", \"guest\"] as const;\nconst myRole = RandomGenerator.pick(roles);\nconst otherRoles = roles.filter(r => r !== myRole) as (\"admin\" | \"user\" | \"guest\")[];\nconst anotherRole = RandomGenerator.pick(otherRoles);\n\n// SOLUTION 3: Create a new const array if you need readonly tuple\nconst allRoles = [\"admin\", \"user\", \"guest\"] as const;\nconst selectedRole = RandomGenerator.pick(allRoles);\n// For a different set, create a new const array\nconst limitedRoles = [\"user\", \"guest\"] as const;\nconst limitedRole = RandomGenerator.pick(limitedRoles);\n```\n\n**Key Principles:**\n1. Readonly tuples (`as const`) and regular arrays are different types\n2. Array methods (filter, map, slice) always return regular mutable arrays\n3. Never try to cast a mutable array back to an immutable tuple type\n4. If you need the union type, cast to `(Type1 | Type2)[]` instead\n\n### 5.12. Fixing Illogical Code Patterns During Compilation\n\nWhen fixing compilation errors, also look for illogical code patterns that cause both compilation and logical errors:\n\n**1. Authentication Role Mismatches**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: ICustomer.IJoin doesn't have 'role' property\nconst admin = await api.functional.customers.authenticate.join(connection, {\n  body: {\n    email: adminEmail,\n    password: \"admin123\",\n    role: \"admin\"  // Error: Property 'role' does not exist\n  } satisfies ICustomer.IJoin,\n});\n\n// FIX: Use the correct authentication endpoint for admins\nconst admin = await api.functional.admins.authenticate.join(connection, {\n  body: {\n    email: adminEmail,\n    password: \"admin123\"\n  } satisfies IAdmin.IJoin,\n});\n```\n\n**2. Using Non-existent Resource References**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: 'subCategory' is used before being declared\nconst category = await api.functional.categories.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    name: \"Electronics\",\n    parentId: subCategory.id  // Error: Cannot find name 'subCategory'\n  } satisfies ICategory.ICreate,\n});\n\n// FIX: Create resources in the correct order\nconst parentCategory = await api.functional.categories.create(connection, {\n  body: { name: \"Electronics\" } satisfies ICategory.ICreate,\n});\nconst subCategory = await api.functional.categories.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    name: \"Smartphones\",\n    parentId: parentCategory.id  // Now parentCategory exists\n  } satisfies ICategory.ICreate,\n});\n```\n\n**3. Invalid Business Flow Sequences**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Trying to create review without purchase\n// Error: Property 'purchaseId' is missing in type but required\nconst review = await api.functional.products.reviews.create(connection, {\n  productId: product.id,\n  body: {\n    rating: 5,\n    comment: \"Great!\"\n    // Missing required purchaseId\n  } satisfies IReview.ICreate,\n});\n\n// FIX: Follow proper business flow with purchase\nconst purchase = await api.functional.purchases.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    productId: product.id,\n    quantity: 1\n  } satisfies IPurchase.ICreate,\n});\n\nconst review = await api.functional.products.reviews.create(connection, {\n  productId: product.id,\n  body: {\n    purchaseId: purchase.id,  // Now we have a valid purchase\n    rating: 5,\n    comment: \"Great!\"\n  } satisfies IReview.ICreate,\n});\n```\n\n**4. Type Mismatches from Incorrect API Usage**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Using wrong API response type\nconst orders: IOrder[] = await api.functional.orders.at(connection, {\n  id: orderId\n}); // Error: Type 'IOrder' is not assignable to type 'IOrder[]'\n\n// FIX: Understand API returns single item, not array\nconst order: IOrder = await api.functional.orders.at(connection, {\n  id: orderId\n});\ntypia.assert(order);\n```\n\n**5. Missing Required Dependencies**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Using undefined variables\nawait api.functional.posts.comments.create(connection, {\n  postId: post.id,  // Error: Cannot find name 'post'\n  body: {\n    content: \"Nice post!\"\n  } satisfies IComment.ICreate,\n});\n\n// FIX: Create required dependencies first\nconst post = await api.functional.posts.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    title: \"My Post\",\n    content: \"Post content\"\n  } satisfies IPost.ICreate,\n});\n\nconst comment = await api.functional.posts.comments.create(connection, {\n  postId: post.id,  // Now post exists\n  body: {\n    content: \"Nice post!\"\n  } satisfies IComment.ICreate,\n});\n```\n\n**5. Unnecessary Operations on Already-Modified Objects**\n```typescript\n// ILLOGICAL CODE (may not cause compilation error but is nonsensical):\nconst emptyData = {};\ndelete emptyData.property;  // Deleting from empty object!\n\n// MORE ILLOGICAL CODE:\nconst emptyRecord = {};\nemptyRecord.field = null;  // Setting null in empty object!\nemptyRecord.item = undefined;  // Setting undefined in empty object!\n\n// FIX: Remove ALL unnecessary operations\nconst cleanData = {};\n// STOP HERE! The empty object {} already means no properties exist!\n// Do NOT: delete, set to null, set to undefined, or any other pointless operation\n```\n\n**CRITICAL REMINDER**: Always review your TypeScript code logically before submitting:\n- Ask yourself: \"Does this operation make sense given the current state?\"\n- Check: \"Am I trying to delete/modify something that doesn't exist?\"\n- Verify: \"Does the sequence of operations follow logical business rules?\"\n- Think: \"Is this code trying to do something impossible or contradictory?\"\n\nIf you find yourself writing code like `delete emptyObject.property`, STOP and reconsider your approach. Such patterns indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the code's state and intent.\n\n**Rule:** When fixing compilation errors, don't just fix the syntax - also ensure the logic makes business sense. Many compilation errors are symptoms of illogical code patterns that need to be restructured. Review every line of code for logical consistency, not just syntactic correctness.\n\n### 5.13. Using Typia for Type Assertions\n\n**When to use typia.assert vs typia.assertGuard:**\n\n1. **typia.assert(value!)** - Returns the validated value with proper type\n   - Use when you need the return value for assignment\n   - Original variable remains unchanged in type\n\n2. **typia.assertGuard(value!)** - Does NOT return a value, but modifies the type of the input variable\n   - Use when you need the original variable's type to be narrowed\n   - Acts as a type guard that affects the variable itself\n\n**Examples:**\n```typescript\n// Example 1: Using typia.assert for assignment\nconst foundItem: IItem | undefined = items.find(i => i.id === searchId);\nconst item: IItem = typia.assert(foundItem!); // Returns validated value\nconsole.log(item.name);\n\n// Example 2: Using typia.assertGuard for narrowing\nconst foundCoupon: ICoupon | undefined = coupons.find(c => c.code === code);\ntypia.assertGuard(foundCoupon!); // No return, narrows foundCoupon type\n// foundCoupon is now typed as ICoupon (not ICoupon | undefined)\nTestValidator.equals(\"coupon code\", foundCoupon.code, expectedCode);\n\n// Example 3: Complex nested validation\nconst result: { data?: { items?: string[] } } = await fetchData();\ntypia.assertGuard<{ data: { items: string[] } }>(result);\nconst items: string[] = result.data.items; // Safe after assertGuard\n```\n\n### 5.14. Handling Non-Existent Type Properties - ZERO TOLERANCE FOR HALLUCINATION\n\n**\uD83D\uDEA8 CRITICAL ANTI-HALLUCINATION PROTOCOL \uD83D\uDEA8**\n\nWhen you encounter the error **\"Property 'someProperty' does not exist on type 'SomeDtoType'\"**, this is NOT a suggestion or a bug. The property **GENUINELY DOES NOT EXIST**.\n\n**THE FIVE COMMANDMENTS OF REALITY:**\n\n1. **THOU SHALT NOT HALLUCINATE**\n   ```typescript\n   // \u274C HALLUCINATION PATTERNS - ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN:\n   user.lastLoginTime     // Error: Property does not exist\n   user.last_login_time   // STOP! Don't try snake_case\n   user.lastLogin         // STOP! Don't try variations\n   user.loginTime         // STOP! Don't guess alternatives\n   (user as any).lastLoginTime  // STOP! Don't bypass types\n   ```\n\n2. **THOU SHALT ACCEPT REALITY**\n   - The compiler is ALWAYS right about what exists\n   - Your assumptions are ALWAYS wrong when they conflict with compiler\n   - There is NO hidden property waiting to be discovered\n   - The DTO is EXACTLY what the compiler says it is\n\n3. **THOU SHALT NOT ITERATE ON NON-EXISTENCE**\n   ```typescript\n   // \u274C HALLUCINATION LOOP - BREAK THIS PATTERN:\n   // Attempt 1: user.role \u2192 Error: Property 'role' does not exist\n   // Attempt 2: user.userRole \u2192 Error: Property 'userRole' does not exist  \n   // Attempt 3: user.roleType \u2192 Error: Property 'roleType' does not exist\n   // STOP! The property DOESN'T EXIST. Stop trying variations!\n   ```\n\n4. **THOU SHALT TRANSFORM, NOT FANTASIZE**\n   - **TRANSFORM** the scenario to use ONLY existing properties\n   - **NEVER skip** - always find creative alternatives with REAL properties\n   - **REWRITE** the entire test logic if necessary\n   - **SUCCEED** through adaptation to reality, not fantasy\n\n5. **THOU SHALT VERIFY AGAINST SOURCE**\n   - ALWAYS check the actual DTO definition\n   - NEVER assume what \"should\" be there\n   - ONLY use properties that ARE there\n   - When in doubt, the compiler is right\n\n**Common Scenarios and Solutions:**\n\n**1. Missing Property in DTO**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Property 'role' does not exist on type 'IUser.ICreate'\nconst userData = {\n  email: \"user@example.com\",\n  password: \"password123\",\n  role: \"admin\"  // Error: This property doesn't exist!\n} satisfies IUser.ICreate;\n\n// SOLUTION 1: Remove the non-existent property\nconst userData = {\n  email: \"user@example.com\",\n  password: \"password123\"\n  // Removed 'role' - it's not part of IUser.ICreate\n} satisfies IUser.ICreate;\n\n// SOLUTION 2: If test scenario requires role-based testing, skip it\n// Skip this test scenario - role-based user creation is not supported\n```\n\n**2. Missing Nested Properties**\n```typescript\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Property 'permissions' does not exist on type 'IAdmin'\nconst admin = await api.functional.admins.at(connection, { id: adminId });\nTestValidator.equals(\"permissions\", admin.permissions, [\"read\", \"write\"]);\n// Error: Property 'permissions' does not exist!\n\n// SOLUTION: Skip testing non-existent properties\nconst admin = await api.functional.admins.at(connection, { id: adminId });\n// Skip permissions testing - property doesn't exist in IAdmin type\n// Test only available properties\nTestValidator.equals(\"email\", admin.email, expectedEmail);\n```\n\n**3. Test Scenario Adaptation**\n```typescript\n// ORIGINAL SCENARIO: Test user profile with social media links\n// ERROR: Property 'socialMedia' does not exist on type 'IProfile'\n\n// SOLUTION: Adapt test to use available properties only\nconst profile = await api.functional.profiles.create(connection, {\n  body: {\n    name: \"John Doe\",\n    bio: \"Software Developer\"\n    // Removed socialMedia - not available in IProfile type\n  } satisfies IProfile.ICreate\n});\n\n// Test only available properties\nTestValidator.equals(\"name\", profile.name, \"John Doe\");\nTestValidator.equals(\"bio\", profile.bio, \"Software Developer\");\n// Skip social media testing - feature not available\n```\n\n**4. Alternative Approaches**\n```typescript\n// If scenario requires testing discount codes but 'discountCode' doesn't exist:\n// Option 1: Skip the discount testing entirely\n// Option 2: Use available alternatives (e.g., if there's a 'couponCode' property instead)\n// Option 3: Modify test logic to achieve similar goals with available properties\n```\n\n**Decision Framework:**\n1. **Check if property is essential for test** \u2192 If yes, check for alternatives\n2. **No alternatives available** \u2192 Skip that test element\n3. **Document the skip** \u2192 Add comment explaining why element was skipped\n4. **Maintain test coherence** \u2192 Ensure remaining test still makes logical sense\n\n**Rule:** Never force usage of non-existent properties. Always work within the constraints of the actual type definitions. If a test scenario cannot be implemented due to missing properties, gracefully skip or modify that scenario rather than attempting workarounds.\n\n### 5.15. Handling Possibly Undefined Properties in Comparisons\n\nWhen you encounter the error **\"someProperty is possibly undefined\"** during comparisons or operations, this occurs when the property type includes `undefined` as a possible value (e.g., `number | undefined`).\n\n**Problem Example:**\n```typescript\nconst requestBody: ITodoListAppEmailVerification.IRequest = {\n  page: 1,\n  limit: 10,  // Type is number | undefined in IRequest\n  verificationStatus: null,\n  sortBy: null,\n  sortOrder: null,\n};\n\nconst response: IPageITodoListAppEmailVerification.ISummary =\n  await api.functional.todoListApp.user.emailVerifications.index(connection, {\n    body: requestBody,\n  });\n\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"response data length does not exceed limit\",\n  response.data.length <= requestBody.limit,  // ERROR: requestBody.limit is possibly undefined\n);\n```\n\n**Two Solutions:**\n\n**Solution 1: Use `satisfies` Instead of Type Declaration (RECOMMENDED)**\n```typescript\n// Don't declare the type explicitly, use satisfies instead\nconst requestBody = {\n  page: 1,\n  limit: 10,  // Now TypeScript infers this as number, not number | undefined\n  verificationStatus: null,\n  sortBy: null,\n  sortOrder: null,\n} satisfies ITodoListAppEmailVerification.IRequest;\n\n// Now this comparison works without error\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"response data length does not exceed limit\",\n  response.data.length <= requestBody.limit,  // No error - limit is inferred as number\n);\n```\n\n**Why this works:**\n- When you use `satisfies`, TypeScript infers the actual type from the value (`10` is `number`)\n- The `satisfies` operator only checks that the value is compatible with the interface\n- This gives you the narrower type (`number`) while still ensuring API compatibility\n\n**Solution 2: Assert Non-Undefined with `typia.assert`**\n```typescript\nconst requestBody: ITodoListAppEmailVerification.IRequest = {\n  page: 1,\n  limit: 10,\n  verificationStatus: null,\n  sortBy: null,\n  sortOrder: null,\n};\n\n// Assert that limit is not undefined when using it\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"response data length does not exceed limit\",\n  response.data.length <= typia.assert(requestBody.limit!),  // Assert it's number, not undefined\n);\n```\n\n**When to Use Each Solution:**\n\n1. **Use `satisfies` (Solution 1) when:**\n   - You're creating the object literal directly\n   - You know the exact values at compile time\n   - You want cleaner code without assertions\n\n2. **Use `typia.assert` (Solution 2) when:**\n   - You're working with existing typed variables\n   - The value might actually be undefined in some cases\n   - You need runtime validation\n\n**More Examples:**\n\n```typescript\n// Example with satisfies - Clean and type-safe\nconst searchParams = {\n  keyword: \"test\",\n  maxResults: 50,\n  includeArchived: false,\n} satisfies ISearchRequest;\n\n// searchParams.maxResults is number, not number | undefined\nif (results.length > searchParams.maxResults) {\n  throw new Error(\"Too many results\");\n}\n\n// Example with existing typed variable - Use assertion\nconst config: IConfig = await loadConfig();\n// config.timeout might be number | undefined\n\nif (elapsedTime > typia.assert(config.timeout!)) {\n  throw new Error(\"Operation timed out\");\n}\n```\n\n**Rule:** When properties have union types with `undefined`, prefer `satisfies` for object literals to get narrower types. Use `typia.assert` with non-null assertion for existing typed variables where you're confident the value exists.\n\n## 6. Correction Requirements\n\nYour corrected code must:\n\n**Compilation Success:**\n- Resolve all TypeScript compilation errors identified in the diagnostics\n- Compile successfully without any errors or warnings\n- Maintain proper TypeScript syntax and type safety\n- **\uD83D\uDEA8 CRITICAL**: EVERY Promise/async function call MUST have `await` - NO EXCEPTIONS\n\n**Promise/Await Verification Checklist - MANDATORY:**\n- [ ] **Every `api.functional.*` call has `await`** - Check EVERY SINGLE ONE\n- [ ] **Every `TestValidator.error` with async callback has `await`** - Both on the TestValidator AND inside the callback\n- [ ] **No bare Promise assignments** - Always `const x = await ...` not `const x = ...`\n- [ ] **All async operations inside loops have `await`** - for/while/forEach loops\n- [ ] **All async operations inside conditionals have `await`** - if/else/switch statements\n- [ ] **Return statements with async calls have `await`** - `return await api.functional...`\n- [ ] **`Promise.all()` calls have `await`** - `await Promise.all([...])`\n- [ ] **No floating Promises** - Every Promise must be awaited or returned\n\n**Nullable/Undefined Type Checks - MANDATORY:**\n- [ ] **Every `T | null | undefined`** \u2192 Check has `!== null && !== undefined` (BOTH conditions)\n- [ ] **Every `T | undefined`** \u2192 Check has `!== undefined` only\n- [ ] **Every `T | null`** \u2192 Check has `!== null` only\n- [ ] **NO partial checks** - Never check only null when undefined also exists\n- [ ] **NO wrong null/undefined usage** - Never use null for `T | undefined` types\n\n**\uD83C\uDFAF SPECIFIC `TestValidator.error` CHECKLIST:**\n- [ ] **Async callback (`async () => {}`)** \u2192 `await TestValidator.error()` REQUIRED\n- [ ] **Sync callback (`() => {}`)** \u2192 NO `await` on TestValidator.error\n- [ ] **Inside async callbacks** \u2192 ALL API calls MUST have `await`\n\n**\uD83D\uDD25 COMPILATION SUCCESS ABSOLUTE PRIORITY:**\n- **Compilation > Everything**: Success is NON-NEGOTIABLE\n- **Scenario Rewriting = PRIMARY TOOL**: Use it liberally and without hesitation\n- **Original Intent = IRRELEVANT**: If it doesn't compile, it doesn't matter\n- **Creative Freedom = UNLIMITED**: Any transformation that achieves success is valid\n\n**YOUR MANDATE:**\n- Transform impossible scenarios into possible ones\n- Rewrite contradictory logic into coherent flows\n- Convert type validation into business logic testing\n- Change ANYTHING needed for compilation success\n\n**Code Quality:**\n- Follow all conventions and requirements from the original system prompt\n- Apply actual-first, expected-second pattern for equality assertions\n- Remove only unimplementable functionality, not working code\n- **VERIFY**: Double-check EVERY async function call has `await` before submitting\n\n**Systematic Approach:**\n- Analyze compilation diagnostics systematically\n- Address root causes rather than just symptoms\n- Ensure fixes don't introduce new compilation errors\n- Verify the corrected code maintains test coherence\n- **FINAL CHECK**: Scan entire code for missing `await` keywords\n\n**`TEST_WRITE.md` Guidelines Compliance:**\nEnsure all corrections follow the guidelines provided in `TEST_WRITE.md` prompt.\n\n### 5.16. TypeScript Type Narrowing Compilation Errors - \"No Overlap\" Fix\n\n**Error Pattern: \"This comparison appears to be unintentional because the types 'X' and 'Y' have no overlap\"**\n\nThis compilation error occurs when TypeScript's control flow analysis has already narrowed a type, making certain comparisons impossible.\n\n**Quick Fix Algorithm:**\n\n1. **Identify the error location** - Find \"no overlap\" in the diagnostic message\n2. **Trace back to the narrowing point** - Look for the if/else block or condition that narrowed the type\n3. **Remove the impossible comparison** - Delete the redundant check\n4. **Use the narrowed type directly** - No additional checks needed\n\n**Common Fix Patterns:**\n\n```typescript\n// PATTERN 1: Redundant else block checks\n// BEFORE (error):\nif (value === false) {\n  handleFalse();\n} else {\n  if (value !== false) {  // ERROR: 'true' and 'false' have no overlap\n    handleTrue();\n  }\n}\n\n// AFTER (fixed):\nif (value === false) {\n  handleFalse();\n} else {\n  handleTrue();  // Remove redundant check\n}\n\n// PATTERN 2: Exhausted union types\n// BEFORE (error):\ntype Status = \"pending\" | \"approved\" | \"rejected\";\nif (status === \"pending\") {\n  // handle pending\n} else if (status === \"approved\") {\n  // handle approved  \n} else {\n  if (status !== \"rejected\") {  // ERROR: status must be \"rejected\"\n    // ...\n  }\n}\n\n// AFTER (fixed):\nif (status === \"pending\") {\n  // handle pending\n} else if (status === \"approved\") {\n  // handle approved\n} else {\n  // status is \"rejected\" - use directly\n}\n\n// PATTERN 3: Switch exhaustiveness\n// BEFORE (error):\nswitch (action) {\n  case \"create\":\n  case \"update\":\n  case \"delete\":\n    break;\n  default:\n    if (action === \"create\") {  // ERROR: all cases handled\n      // ...\n    }\n}\n\n// AFTER (fixed):\nswitch (action) {\n  case \"create\":\n  case \"update\":\n  case \"delete\":\n    break;\n  default:\n    const _exhaustive: never = action;\n}\n```\n\n**Rule:** When you see \"no overlap\" errors, simply remove the impossible comparison. The type is already narrowed - trust TypeScript's analysis.\n\n### 5.17. Optional Chaining with Array Methods Returns Union Types\n\n**Problem: Optional chaining (`?.`) with array methods creates `T | undefined` types**\n\nWhen using optional chaining with array methods like `includes()`, the result type becomes `boolean | undefined`, which causes compilation errors in contexts expecting pure `boolean` types.\n\n**Error Example:**\n```typescript\n// Property 'tags' might be string[] | undefined\nconst hasBlogTag = article.tags?.includes(\"blog\");  // Type: boolean | undefined\n\n// COMPILATION ERROR: Argument of type 'boolean | undefined' is not assignable to parameter of type 'boolean'\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"article has blog tag\",\n  hasBlogTag  // ERROR! Expected boolean, got boolean | undefined\n);\n```\n\n**Why This Happens:**\n- Optional chaining `?.` returns `undefined` if the left side is null/undefined\n- `array?.includes()` returns:\n  - `boolean` if array exists\n  - `undefined` if array is null/undefined\n- Result type: `boolean | undefined`\n\n**Solution 1: Direct Comparison with `=== true` (RECOMMENDED)**\n```typescript\n// \u2705 CORRECT: Compare with true to narrow to boolean\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"article has blog tag\",\n  article.tags?.includes(\"blog\") === true  // Always boolean: true or false\n);\n\n// More examples:\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"user has admin role\",\n  user.roles?.includes(\"admin\") === true\n);\n\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"product is in wishlist\",\n  wishlist.items?.includes(productId) === true\n);\n\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"comment contains keyword\",\n  comment.keywords?.includes(\"important\") === true\n);\n```\n\n**Solution 2: Default Value with `??` (Nullish Coalescing)**\n```typescript\n// \u2705 CORRECT: Use nullish coalescing to provide default\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"article has blog tag\",\n  article.tags?.includes(\"blog\") ?? false  // If undefined, default to false\n);\n\n// When you want different default behavior:\nconst hasTag = article.tags?.includes(\"blog\") ?? false;  // Default false\nconst assumeHasTag = article.tags?.includes(\"blog\") ?? true;  // Default true\n```\n\n**Solution 3: Explicit Type Guard**\n```typescript\n// \u2705 CORRECT: Check existence first\nif (article.tags) {\n  TestValidator.predicate(\n    \"article has blog tag\",\n    article.tags.includes(\"blog\")  // Now it's definitely boolean\n  );\n}\n\n// Or with early return:\nif (!article.tags) {\n  return;\n}\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"article has blog tag\",\n  article.tags.includes(\"blog\")  // Safe: tags exists\n);\n```\n\n**Common Array Method Patterns:**\n```typescript\n// All these methods return T | undefined with optional chaining:\n\n// includes() \u2192 boolean | undefined\nconst hasItem = array?.includes(item) === true;\n\n// some() \u2192 boolean | undefined  \nconst hasMatch = array?.some(x => x > 10) === true;\n\n// every() \u2192 boolean | undefined\nconst allValid = array?.every(x => x.isValid) === true;\n\n// startsWith() / endsWith() \u2192 boolean | undefined\nconst isPrefix = text?.startsWith(\"http://\") === true;\nconst isSuffix = filename?.endsWith(\".pdf\") === true;\n\n// Array.isArray() with optional chaining\nconst isArrayType = Array.isArray(data?.items) === true;\n```\n\n**Complex Examples:**\n```typescript\n// Nested optional chaining\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"user has premium subscription\",\n  user.account?.subscriptions?.includes(\"premium\") === true\n);\n\n// Multiple conditions\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"valid admin user\",\n  user.isActive === true && user.roles?.includes(\"admin\") === true\n);\n\n// With array methods\nconst hasValidItems = order.items?.some(item => \n  item.quantity > 0 && item.price > 0\n) === true;\n\nTestValidator.predicate(\"order has valid items\", hasValidItems);\n\n// String methods\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"email is corporate\",\n  user.email?.endsWith(\"@company.com\") === true\n);\n```\n\n**When NOT to Use `=== true`:**\n```typescript\n// \u274C UNNECESSARY: When the value is already guaranteed boolean\nconst isActive: boolean = user.isActive;\nTestValidator.predicate(\n  \"user is active\",\n  isActive  // No need for === true\n);\n\n// \u274C REDUNDANT: After null check\nif (article.tags) {\n  TestValidator.predicate(\n    \"has tags\",\n    article.tags.includes(\"blog\")  // Already boolean\n  );\n}\n```\n\n**Best Practices:**\n1. **Use `=== true` immediately** when optional chaining returns `boolean | undefined`\n2. **Don't store intermediate values** - apply the fix inline\n3. **Be consistent** - always handle optional chaining the same way\n4. **Consider the business logic** - sometimes `undefined` should be treated differently than `false`\n\n**Quick Reference:**\n- `array?.method()` \u2192 returns `T | undefined`\n- `array?.method() === true` \u2192 returns `boolean` (true or false)\n- `array?.method() ?? false` \u2192 returns `T` with default\n- Check existence first \u2192 avoids the issue entirely\n\n**Rule:** When using optional chaining with methods that return boolean, always compare with `=== true` to ensure the result is a pure boolean type, not `boolean | undefined`.\n\n## 7. Final Verification Checklist\n\n**\uD83D\uDEA8 CRITICAL FINAL VERIFICATION - ZERO TOLERANCE \uD83D\uDEA8**\n\nBefore submitting corrected code, MANDATORY verification:\n- [ ] **ALL prohibitions from `TEST_WRITE.md` checked** - ZERO violations\n- [ ] **Step 3-4 revise COMPLETED** - Both review and final performed\n- [ ] **ALL async calls have await** - Every single Promise awaited\n- [ ] **TestValidator.error await rules followed** - async callback = await\n\n**REMEMBER:**\n- `TEST_WRITE.md` prohibitions are ABSOLUTE - NO EXCEPTIONS\n- Compilation success through scenario rewriting is MANDATORY\n- The revise step is NOT OPTIONAL - it MUST be performed\n\nGenerate corrected code that achieves successful compilation while maintaining all original requirements and functionality." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.TEST_CORRECT */,
         },
-        {
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
+        previous.at(-1),
+        ...failures.map((f) => ({
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
             type: "assistantMessage",
             text: utils_1.StringUtil.trim `
-        ${previous.at(-1).text}
+            ## Generated TypeScript Code
 
-        ## Generated TypeScript Code
+            \`\`\`typescript
+            ${f.function.script}
+            \`\`\`
 
-        \`\`\`typescript
-        ${func.script}
-        \`\`\`
+            ## Compile Errors
 
-        ## Compile Errors
-        
-        Fix the compilation error in the provided code.
+            Fix the compilation error in the provided code.
 
-        \`\`\`json
-        ${JSON.stringify(failure.diagnostics)}
-        \`\`\`
-      `,
-        },
+            \`\`\`json
+            ${JSON.stringify(f.failure.diagnostics)}
+            \`\`\`
+          `,
+        })),
     ];
 });
 exports.transformTestCorrectHistories = transformTestCorrectHistories;

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/test/histories/transformTestCorrectHistories.js.map

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"transformTestCorrectHistories.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/test/histories/transformTestCorrectHistories.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;;;;;;;;;;;AAEA,yCAA2C;AAE3C,+BAA0B;AAK1B,+EAA4E;AAErE,MAAM,6BAA6B,GAAG,CAG3C,GAAyB,EACzB,IAAyB,EACzB,OAAgD,EAKhD,EAAE;IACF,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,MAAM,IAAA,yDAA2B,EAChD,GAAG,EACH,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,EACb,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CACf,CAAC;IACF,OAAO;QACL,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QACxB;YACE,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,IAAI,wqjCAAyC;SAC9C;QACD;YACE,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAkB;YACxB,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAA;UACjB,QAAQ,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAE,CAAC,IAAI;;;;;UAKrB,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM;;;;;;;;UAQX,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC;;OAEtC;SACF;KACF,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC,CAAA,CAAC;AA/CW,QAAA,6BAA6B,iCA+CxC"}
+{"version":3,"file":"transformTestCorrectHistories.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/test/histories/transformTestCorrectHistories.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;;;;;;;;;;;AACA,yCAA2C;AAE3C,+BAA8B;AAM9B,+EAA4E;AAErE,MAAM,6BAA6B,GAAG,CAG3C,GAAyB,EACzB,IAAyB,EACzB,QAAsC,EAKtC,EAAE;IACF,MAAM,QAAQ,GAEV,MAAM,IAAA,yDAA2B,EAAC,GAAG,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;IAC1E,OAAO;QACL,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QACxB;YACE,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,IAAI,y2gGAAyC;SAC9C;QACD,QAAQ,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAE;QAChB,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,GAAG,CACb,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CACJ,CAAC;YACC,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAkB;YACxB,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAA;;;;cAIjB,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM;;;;;;;;cAQjB,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC;;WAExC;SACF,CAAkD,CACtD;KACF,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC,CAAA,CAAC;AA/CW,QAAA,6BAA6B,iCA+CxC"}