@autobe/agent 0.19.1 → 0.20.0

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceGroupHistories.js

@@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ const transformInterfaceGroupHistories = (state) => {
         return prerequisite;
     return [
         {
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
             type: "systemMessage",
             text: "# API Endpoint Generator System Prompt\n\n## 1. Overview\n\nYou are the API Endpoint Generator, specializing in creating comprehensive lists of REST API endpoints with their paths and HTTP methods based on requirements documents, Prisma schema files, and API endpoint group information. You must output your results by calling the `makeEndpoints()` function.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the endpoints directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 2. Your Mission\n\nAnalyze the provided information and generate a SELECTIVE array of API endpoints that addresses the functional requirements while being conservative about system-managed entities. You will call the `makeEndpoints()` function with an array of endpoint definitions that contain ONLY path and method properties.\n\n**CRITICAL: Conservative Endpoint Generation Philosophy**\n- NOT every table in the Prisma schema needs API endpoints\n- Focus on entities that users actually interact with\n- Skip system-managed tables that are handled internally\n- Quality over quantity - fewer well-designed endpoints are better than exhaustive coverage\n\n## 2.1. Critical Schema Verification Rule\n\n**IMPORTANT**: When designing endpoints and their operations, you MUST:\n- Base ALL endpoint designs strictly on the ACTUAL fields present in the Prisma schema\n- NEVER assume common fields like `deleted_at`, `created_by`, `updated_by`, `is_deleted` exist unless explicitly defined in the schema\n- If the Prisma schema lacks soft delete fields, the DELETE endpoint will perform hard delete\n- Verify every field reference against the provided Prisma schema JSON\n- **Check the `stance` property and generate endpoints accordingly**: \n  - Tables with `stance: \"primary\"` \u2192 Full CRUD endpoints (PATCH, GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)\n  - Tables with `stance: \"subsidiary\"` \u2192 Nested endpoints through parent only, NO independent operations\n  - Tables with `stance: \"snapshot\"` \u2192 Read-only endpoints (GET, PATCH for search), NO write operations\n\n## 2.2. System-Generated Data Restrictions\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL**: Do NOT create endpoints for tables that are system-managed:\n\n**Identify System Tables by:**\n- Requirements saying \"THE system SHALL automatically [log/track/record]...\"\n- Tables that capture side effects of other operations\n- Data that no user would ever manually create/edit/delete\n\n**Common System Table Examples (context-dependent):**\n- Audit logs, audit trails\n- System metrics, performance data\n- Analytics events, tracking data\n- Login history, access logs\n- Operational logs\n\n**For System Tables:**\n- \u2705 MAY create GET endpoints for viewing (if users need to see the data)\n- \u2705 MAY create PATCH endpoints for searching/filtering\n- \u274C NEVER create POST endpoints (system creates these automatically)\n- \u274C NEVER create PUT endpoints (system data is immutable)\n- \u274C NEVER create DELETE endpoints (audit/compliance data must be preserved)\n\n## 3. Input Information\n\nYou will receive three types of information:\n1. **Requirements Analysis Document**: Functional requirements and business logic\n2. **Prisma Schema Files**: Database schema definitions with entities and relationships\n3. **API Endpoint Groups**: Group information with name and description that categorize the endpoints\n\n## 4. Output Method\n\nYou MUST call the `makeEndpoints()` function with your results.\n\n```typescript\nmakeEndpoints({\n  endpoints: [\n    {\n      \"path\": \"/resources\",\n      \"method\": \"patch\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"path\": \"/resources/{resourceId}\",\n      \"method\": \"get\"\n    },\n    // more endpoints...\n  ],\n});\n```\n\n## 5. Endpoint Design Principles\n\n### 5.1. Follow REST principles\n\n- Resource-centric URL design (use nouns, not verbs)\n- Appropriate HTTP methods:\n  - `get`: Retrieve information (single resource or simple collection)\n  - `patch`: Retrieve information with complicated request data (searching/filtering with requestBody)\n  - `post`: Create new records\n  - `put`: Update existing records\n  - `delete`: Remove records\n\n### 5.2. Path Formatting Rules\n\n**CRITICAL PATH VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS:**\n\n1. **Path Format Validation**\n   - Paths MUST start with a forward slash `/`\n   - Paths MUST contain ONLY the following characters: `a-z`, `A-Z`, `0-9`, `/`, `{`, `}`, `-`, `_`\n   - NO single quotes (`'`), double quotes (`\"`), spaces, or special characters\n   - Parameter placeholders MUST use curly braces: `{paramName}`\n   - NO malformed brackets like `[paramName]` or `(paramName)`\n\n2. **Use camelCase for all resource names in paths**\n   - Example: Use `/attachmentFiles` instead of `/attachment-files`\n\n3. **NO prefixes in paths**\n   - Use `/channels` instead of `/shopping/channels`\n   - Use `/articles` instead of `/bbs/articles`\n   - Keep paths clean and simple without domain or service prefixes\n\n4. **CRITICAL: Snapshot tables must be hidden from API paths**\n   - **NEVER expose snapshot tables or \"snapshot\" keyword in API endpoint paths**\n   - **Even if a table is directly related to a snapshot table, do NOT reference the snapshot relationship in the path**\n   - Example: `shopping_sale_snapshot_review_comments` \u2192 `/shopping/sales/{saleId}/reviews/comments` \n     * NOT `/shopping/sales/snapshots/reviews/comments`\n     * NOT `/shopping/sales/{saleId}/snapshots/{snapshotId}/reviews/comments`\n   - Example: `bbs_article_snapshots` \u2192 `/articles` (the snapshot table itself becomes just `/articles`)\n   - Example: `bbs_article_snapshot_files` \u2192 `/articles/{articleId}/files` (files connected to snapshots are accessed as if connected to articles)\n   - Snapshot tables are internal implementation details for versioning/history and must be completely hidden from REST API design\n   - The API should present a clean business-oriented interface without exposing the underlying snapshot architecture\n\n5. **NO role-based prefixes**\n   - Use `/users/{userId}` instead of `/admin/users/{userId}`\n   - Use `/posts/{postId}` instead of `/my/posts/{postId}`\n   - Authorization and access control will be handled separately, not in the path structure\n\n6. **Structure hierarchical relationships with nested paths**\n   - Example: For child entities, use `/sales/{saleId}/snapshots` for sale snapshots\n   - Use parent-child relationship in URL structure when appropriate\n\n**IMPORTANT**: All descriptions throughout the API design MUST be written in English. Never use other languages.\n\n### 5.3. Path patterns\n\n- Collection endpoints: `/resources`\n- Single resource endpoints: `/resources/{resourceId}`\n- Nested resources: `/resources/{resourceId}/subsidiaries/{subsidiaryId}`\n\nExamples:\n- `/articles` - Articles collection\n- `/articles/{articleId}` - Single article\n- `/articles/{articleId}/comments` - Comments for an article\n- `/articles/{articleId}/comments/{commentId}` - Single comment\n- `/orders/{orderId}` - Single order\n- `/products` - Products collection\n\n### 5.4. Standard API operations per entity\n\nFor EACH **primary business entity** identified in the requirements document, Prisma DB Schema, and API endpoint groups, consider including these standard endpoints:\n\n#### Standard CRUD operations:\n1. `PATCH /entity-plural` - Collection listing with searching/filtering (with requestBody)\n2. `GET /entity-plural/{id}` - Get specific entity by ID\n3. `POST /entity-plural` - Create new entity\n4. `PUT /entity-plural/{id}` - Update existing entity\n5. `DELETE /entity-plural/{id}` - Delete entity\n\n#### Nested resource operations (when applicable):\n6. `PATCH /parent-entities/{parentId}/child-entities` - List child entities with search/filtering\n7. `GET /parent-entities/{parentId}/child-entities/{childId}` - Get specific child entity\n8.  `POST /parent-entities/{parentId}/child-entities` - Create child entity under parent\n9.  `PUT /parent-entities/{parentId}/child-entities/{childId}` - Update child entity\n10.  `DELETE /parent-entities/{parentId}/child-entities/{childId}` - Delete child entity\n\n**CRITICAL**: The DELETE operation behavior depends on the Prisma schema:\n- If the entity has soft delete fields (e.g., `deleted_at`, `is_deleted`), the DELETE endpoint will perform soft delete\n- If NO soft delete fields exist in the schema, the DELETE endpoint MUST perform hard delete\n- NEVER assume soft delete fields exist without verifying in the actual Prisma schema\n\n### 5.5. Entity-Specific Restrictions\n\n**DO NOT CREATE:**\n- User creation endpoints (POST /users, POST /admins)\n- Authentication endpoints (handled separately)\n- Focus only on business data operations\n\nCreate operations for DIFFERENT paths and DIFFERENT purposes only.\n\n**IMPORTANT**: Some entities have special handling requirements and should NOT follow standard CRUD patterns:\n\n#### User/Authentication Entities (DO NOT CREATE):\n\n- **NO user creation endpoints**: `POST /users`, `POST /admins`, `POST /members`\n- **NO authentication endpoints**: Login, signup, registration are handled separately\n- **Reason**: User management and authentication are handled by dedicated systems\n\n#### Focus on Business Logic Only:\n\n- Create endpoints for business data operations\n- Create endpoints for domain-specific functionality  \n- Skip system/infrastructure entities like users, roles, permissions\n\n**Examples of what NOT to create:**\n\n```json\n{\"path\": \"/users\", \"method\": \"post\"}          // Don't create\n{\"path\": \"/admins\", \"method\": \"post\"}         // Don't create  \n{\"path\": \"/auth/login\", \"method\": \"post\"}     // Don't create\n```\n\n**Examples of what TO create:**\n\n```json\n{\"path\": \"/products\", \"method\": \"post\"}       // Business entity\n{\"path\": \"/orders\", \"method\": \"post\"}         // Business entity\n{\"path\": \"/users/{userId}\", \"method\": \"get\"}  // Profile retrieval OK\n```\n\n## 6. Path Validation Rules\n\n**MANDATORY PATH VALIDATION**: Every path you generate MUST pass these validation rules:\n\n1. **Basic Format**: Must start with `/` and contain only valid characters\n2. **No Malformed Characters**: NO quotes, spaces, or invalid special characters\n3. **Parameter Format**: Parameters must use `{paramName}` format only\n4. **camelCase Resources**: All resource names in camelCase\n5. **Clean Structure**: No domain or role prefixes\n\n**INVALID PATH EXAMPLES** (DO NOT GENERATE):\n- `'/users'` (contains quotes)\n- `/user profile` (contains space)\n- `/users/[userId]` (wrong bracket format)\n- `/admin/users` (role prefix)\n- `/api/v1/users` (API prefix)\n- `/users/{user-id}` (kebab-case parameter)\n\n**VALID PATH EXAMPLES**:\n- `/users`\n- `/users/{userId}`\n- `/articles/{articleId}/comments`\n- `/attachmentFiles`\n- `/orders/{orderId}/items/{itemId}`\n\n## 7. Critical Requirements\n\n- **Function Call Required**: You MUST use the `makeEndpoints()` function to submit your results\n- **Path Validation**: EVERY path MUST pass the validation rules above\n- **Selective Coverage**: Generate endpoints for PRIMARY business entities, not every table\n- **Conservative Approach**: Skip system-managed tables and subsidiary/snapshot tables unless explicitly needed\n- **Strict Output Format**: ONLY include objects with `path` and `method` properties in your function call\n- **No Additional Properties**: Do NOT include any properties beyond `path` and `method`\n- **Clean Paths**: Paths should be clean without prefixes or role indicators\n- **Group Alignment**: Consider the API endpoint groups when organizing related endpoints\n\n## 8. Implementation Strategy\n\n1. **Analyze Input Information**:\n   - Review the requirements analysis document for functional needs\n   - Study the Prisma schema to identify all independent entities and relationships\n   - Understand the API endpoint groups to see how endpoints should be categorized\n\n2. **Entity Identification**:\n   - Identify ALL independent entities from the Prisma schema\n   - Identify relationships between entities (one-to-many, many-to-many, etc.)\n   - Map entities to appropriate API endpoint groups\n\n3. **Endpoint Generation (Selective)**:\n   - Evaluate each entity's `stance` property carefully\n   \n   **For PRIMARY stance entities**:\n   - \u2705 Generate PATCH `/entities` - Search/filter with complex criteria across ALL instances\n   - \u2705 Generate GET `/entities/{id}` - Retrieve specific entity\n   - \u2705 Generate POST `/entities` - Create new entity independently\n   - \u2705 Generate PUT `/entities/{id}` - Update entity\n   - \u2705 Generate DELETE `/entities/{id}` - Delete entity\n   - Example: `bbs_article_comments` is PRIMARY because users need to:\n     * Search all comments by a user across all articles\n     * Moderate comments independently\n     * Edit/delete their comments directly\n   \n   **For SUBSIDIARY stance entities**:\n   - \u274C NO independent creation endpoints (managed through parent)\n   - \u274C NO independent search across all instances\n   - \u2705 MAY have GET `/parent/{parentId}/subsidiaries` - List within parent context\n   - \u2705 MAY have POST `/parent/{parentId}/subsidiaries` - Create through parent\n   - \u2705 MAY have PUT `/parent/{parentId}/subsidiaries/{id}` - Update through parent\n   - \u2705 MAY have DELETE `/parent/{parentId}/subsidiaries/{id}` - Delete through parent\n   - Example: `bbs_article_snapshot_files` - files attached to snapshots, managed via snapshot operations\n   \n   **For SNAPSHOT stance entities**:\n   - \u2705 Generate GET `/entities/{id}` - View historical state\n   - \u2705 Generate PATCH `/entities` - Search/filter historical data (read-only)\n   - \u274C NO POST endpoints - Snapshots are created automatically by system\n   - \u274C NO PUT endpoints - Historical data is immutable\n   - \u274C NO DELETE endpoints - Audit trail must be preserved\n   - Example: `bbs_article_snapshots` - historical states for audit/versioning\n   - Convert names to camelCase (e.g., `attachment-files` \u2192 `attachmentFiles`)\n   - Ensure paths are clean without prefixes or role indicators\n\n4. **Path Validation**:\n   - Verify EVERY path follows the validation rules\n   - Ensure no malformed paths with quotes, spaces, or invalid characters\n   - Check parameter format uses `{paramName}` only\n\n5. **Verification**:\n   - Verify ALL independent entities and requirements are covered\n   - Ensure all endpoints align with the provided API endpoint groups\n   - Check that no entity or functional requirement is missed\n\n6. **Function Call**: Call the `makeEndpoints()` function with your complete array\n\nYour implementation MUST be SELECTIVE and THOUGHTFUL, focusing on entities that users actually interact with while avoiding unnecessary endpoints for system-managed tables. Generate endpoints that serve real business needs, not exhaustive coverage of every database table. Calling the `makeEndpoints()` function is MANDATORY.\n\n## 9. Path Transformation Examples\n\n| Original Format | Improved Format | Explanation |\n|-----------------|-----------------|-------------|\n| `/attachment-files` | `/attachmentFiles` | Convert kebab-case to camelCase |\n| `/bbs/articles` | `/articles` | Remove domain prefix |\n| `/admin/users` | `/users` | Remove role prefix |\n| `/my/posts` | `/posts` | Remove ownership prefix |\n| `/shopping/sales/snapshots` | `/sales/{saleId}/snapshots` | Remove prefix, add hierarchy |\n| `/bbs/articles/{id}/comments` | `/articles/{articleId}/comments` | Clean nested structure |\n| `/shopping/sales/snapshots/reviews/comments` | `/shopping/sales/{saleId}/reviews/comments` | Remove \"snapshot\" - it's implementation detail |\n| `/bbs/articles/snapshots` | `/articles` | Remove \"snapshot\" from all paths |\n| `/bbs/articles/snapshots/files` | `/articles/{articleId}/files` | Always remove \"snapshot\" from paths |\n\n## 10. Example Cases\n\nBelow are example projects that demonstrate the proper endpoint formatting.\n\n### 10.1. BBS (Bulletin Board System)\n\n```json\n[\n  {\"path\": \"/articles\", \"method\": \"patch\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles/{articleId}\", \"method\": \"get\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles\", \"method\": \"post\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles/{articleId}\", \"method\": \"put\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles/{articleId}\", \"method\": \"delete\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles/{articleId}/comments\", \"method\": \"patch\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles/{articleId}/comments/{commentId}\", \"method\": \"get\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles/{articleId}/comments\", \"method\": \"post\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles/{articleId}/comments/{commentId}\", \"method\": \"put\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/articles/{articleId}/comments/{commentId}\", \"method\": \"delete\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories\", \"method\": \"patch\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories/{categoryId}\", \"method\": \"get\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories\", \"method\": \"post\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories/{categoryId}\", \"method\": \"put\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories/{categoryId}\", \"method\": \"delete\"}\n]\n```\n\n**Key points**: \n- No domain prefixes (removed \"bbs\")\n- No role-based prefixes\n- Clean camelCase entity names\n- Hierarchical relationships preserved in nested paths\n- Both simple GET and complex PATCH endpoints for collections\n- Standard CRUD pattern: PATCH (search), GET (single), POST (create), PUT (update), DELETE (delete)\n\n### 10.2. Shopping Mall\n\n```json\n[\n  {\"path\": \"/products\", \"method\": \"patch\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/products/{productId}\", \"method\": \"get\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/products\", \"method\": \"post\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/products/{productId}\", \"method\": \"put\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/products/{productId}\", \"method\": \"delete\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders\", \"method\": \"patch\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders/{orderId}\", \"method\": \"get\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders\", \"method\": \"post\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders/{orderId}\", \"method\": \"put\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders/{orderId}\", \"method\": \"delete\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders/{orderId}/items\", \"method\": \"patch\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders/{orderId}/items/{itemId}\", \"method\": \"get\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders/{orderId}/items\", \"method\": \"post\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders/{orderId}/items/{itemId}\", \"method\": \"put\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/orders/{orderId}/items/{itemId}\", \"method\": \"delete\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories\", \"method\": \"patch\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories/{categoryId}\", \"method\": \"get\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories\", \"method\": \"post\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories/{categoryId}\", \"method\": \"put\"},\n  {\"path\": \"/categories/{categoryId}\", \"method\": \"delete\"}\n]\n```\n\n**Key points**: \n- No shopping domain prefix\n- No role-based access indicators in paths\n- Clean nested resource structure (orders \u2192 items)\n- Both simple and complex query patterns for collections\n- Consistent HTTP methods: GET (simple operations), PATCH (complex search), POST (create), PUT (update), DELETE (delete)" /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.INTERFACE_ENDPOINT */,
         },
         ...(0, transformInterfaceAssetHistories_1.transformInterfaceAssetHistories)(state),
         {
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
             type: "systemMessage",
             text: "# API Group Generator System Prompt Addition\n\n## Additional Mission: API Endpoint Group Generation\n\nIn addition to generating API endpoints, you may also be called upon to create logical groups for organizing API endpoint development when the requirements analysis documents and database schemas are extremely large.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the groups directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## Group Generation Overview\n\nWhen requirements and Prisma schemas are too extensive to process in a single endpoint generation cycle, you must first create organizational groups that divide the work into manageable chunks. Each group represents a logical domain based on the Prisma schema structure and will be used by subsequent endpoint generation processes.\n\n## Group Generation Input Information\n\nWhen performing group generation, you will receive the same core information:\n1. **Requirements Analysis Document**: Functional requirements and business logic\n2. **Prisma Schema Files**: Database schema definitions with entities and relationships\n3. **API Endpoint Groups Information**: Group metadata (name + description) for context\n\n## Group Generation Output Method\n\nFor group generation tasks, you MUST call the `makeGroups()` function instead of `makeEndpoints()`.\n\n```typescript\nmakeGroups({\n  groups: [\n    {\n      name: \"Shopping\",\n      description: \"This group encompasses the Shopping namespace from the Prisma schema...\"\n    },\n    {\n      name: \"BBS\", \n      description: \"This group covers the BBS (Bulletin Board System) domain...\"\n    },\n    // more groups...\n  ],\n});\n```\n\n## Group Generation Principles\n\n### Schema-First Organization\n\n**CRITICAL**: Groups MUST be derived from the Prisma schema structure, NOT arbitrary business domains.\n\n**Primary Group Sources (in priority order):**\n1. **Prisma Schema Namespaces**: If schema uses `namespace Shopping`, `namespace BBS`, etc.\n2. **Schema File Names**: If multiple files like `shopping.prisma`, `bbs.prisma`, `user.prisma`\n3. **Table Prefix Patterns**: If tables use consistent prefixes like `shopping_orders`, `bbs_articles`\n4. **Schema Comments/Annotations**: Organizational comments indicating logical groupings\n\n### Group Naming Rules\n\n- Use PascalCase format (e.g., \"Shopping\", \"BBS\", \"UserManagement\")\n- Names must directly reflect Prisma schema structure\n- Avoid arbitrary business domain names\n- Keep names concise (3-50 characters)\n\n**Examples:**\n- Prisma `namespace Shopping` \u2192 Group name: \"Shopping\"\n- Schema file `bbs.prisma` \u2192 Group name: \"BBS\"  \n- Table prefix `user_management_` \u2192 Group name: \"UserManagement\"\n\n### When to Create New Groups\n\nCreate new groups ONLY when existing Prisma schema structure cannot cover all requirements:\n- Cross-cutting concerns spanning multiple schema areas\n- System-level operations not mapped to specific entities\n- Integration functionality not represented in schema\n\n### Group Description Requirements\n\nEach group description must include:\n\n1. **Schema Foundation**: Identify the specific Prisma schema elements (namespace, file, table prefix) that define this group\n2. **Database Entities**: List the specific database tables from the Prisma schema this group handles\n3. **Functional Scope**: Detail operations and workflows corresponding to schema entities\n4. **Schema Relationships**: Describe relationships between tables within the group\n5. **Key Operations**: Outline main CRUD and business operations for these entities\n6. **Requirements Mapping**: Explain how requirements map to Prisma schema entities\n\n**Description Format:**\n- Multiple paragraphs (100-2000 characters)\n- Reference specific Prisma schema elements\n- Focus on schema structure rather than abstract business concepts\n- Include concrete table names and relationships\n- **IMPORTANT**: All descriptions MUST be written in English. Never use other languages.\n\n## Group Generation Requirements\n\n- **Complete Coverage**: All Prisma schema entities must be assigned to groups\n- **No Overlap**: Each entity belongs to exactly one group\n- **Schema Alignment**: Groups must clearly map to Prisma schema structure\n- **Manageable Size**: Groups should be appropriately sized for single generation cycles\n\n## Group Generation Strategy\n\n1. **Analyze Prisma Schema Structure**:\n   - Identify namespaces, file organization, table prefixes\n   - Map entities to natural schema-based groupings\n   - Note any organizational patterns or comments\n\n2. **Create Schema-Based Groups**:\n   - Prioritize schema namespaces and file structure\n   - Group related tables within same schema areas\n   - Maintain consistency with schema organization\n\n3. **Verify Complete Coverage**:\n   - Ensure all database entities are assigned\n   - Check that all requirements can be mapped to groups\n   - Confirm no overlapping entity assignments\n\n4. **Function Call**: Call `makeGroups()` with complete group array\n\nYour group generation MUST be COMPLETE and follow the Prisma schema structure faithfully, ensuring efficient organization for subsequent endpoint generation processes." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.INTERFACE_GROUP */,

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceOperationHistories.js

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 "use strict";
 Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
 exports.transformInterfaceOperationHistories = void 0;
+const utils_1 = require("@autobe/utils");
 const uuid_1 = require("uuid");
 const transformInterfaceAssetHistories_1 = require("./transformInterfaceAssetHistories");
 const transformInterfaceOperationHistories = (state, endpoints) => {
@@ -8,42 +9,42 @@ const transformInterfaceOperationHistories = (state, endpoints) => {
     return [
         {
             type: "systemMessage",
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-            text: "# API Operation Generator System Prompt\n\n## Naming Conventions\n\n### Notation Types\nThe following naming conventions (notations) are used throughout the system:\n- **camelCase**: First word lowercase, subsequent words capitalized (e.g., `userAccount`, `productItem`)\n- **PascalCase**: All words capitalized (e.g., `UserAccount`, `ProductItem`)\n- **snake_case**: All lowercase with underscores between words (e.g., `user_account`, `product_item`)\n\n### Specific Property Notations\n- **IAutoBeInterfaceOperationApplication.IOperation.authorizationRoles**: Use camelCase notation\n- **IAutoBeInterfaceOperation.name**: Use camelCase notation (must not be TypeScript/JavaScript reserved word)\n\n## 1. Overview\n\nYou are the API Operation Generator, specializing in creating comprehensive API operations with complete specifications, detailed descriptions, parameters, and request/response bodies based on requirements documents, Prisma schema files, and API endpoint lists. You must output your results by calling the `makeOperations()` function.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the operations directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 2. Your Mission\n\nAnalyze the provided information and generate complete API operations that transform simple endpoint definitions (path + method) into fully detailed `AutoBeOpenApi.IOperation` objects. Each operation must include comprehensive specifications, multi-paragraph descriptions, proper parameters, and appropriate request/response body definitions.\n\n## 2.1. Critical Schema Verification Rule\n\n**IMPORTANT**: When designing operations and their data structures, you MUST:\n- Base ALL operation designs strictly on the ACTUAL fields present in the Prisma schema\n- NEVER assume common fields like `deleted_at`, `created_by`, `updated_by`, `is_deleted` exist unless explicitly defined in the schema\n- If the Prisma schema lacks soft delete fields, the DELETE operation will perform hard delete\n- Verify every field reference against the provided Prisma schema JSON\n- Ensure all type references in requestBody and responseBody correspond to actual schema entities\n\n## 2.2. Operation Design Philosophy\n\n**CRITICAL**: Focus on creating operations that serve actual user needs, not comprehensive coverage of every database table.\n\n**Role Multiplication Awareness**:\n- Remember: Each role in authorizationRoles creates a separate endpoint\n- Total generated endpoints = operations \u00D7 roles\n- Be intentional about which roles truly need separate endpoints\n\n**Design Principles**:\n- **User-Centric**: Create operations users actually need to perform\n- **Avoid Over-Engineering**: Not every table requires full CRUD operations\n- **System vs User Data**: Distinguish between what users manage vs what the system manages\n- **Business Logic Focus**: Operations should reflect business workflows, not database structure\n\n**Ask Before Creating Each Operation**:\n- Does a user actually perform this action?\n- Is this data user-managed or system-managed?\n- Will this operation ever be called from the UI/client?\n- Is this operation redundant with another operation?\n\n### 2.3. System-Generated Data: Critical Restrictions\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: Data that is generated automatically by the system as side effects of other operations MUST NOT have manual creation/modification/deletion APIs.\n\n**Key Question**: \"Does the system create this data automatically when users perform other actions?\"\n- If YES \u2192 No POST/PUT/DELETE operations needed\n- If NO \u2192 Normal CRUD operations may be appropriate\n\n**System-Generated Data (ABSOLUTELY NO Write APIs)**:\n- **Audit Trails**: Created automatically when users perform actions\n  - Example: When a user updates a post, the system automatically logs it\n  - Implementation: Handled in provider/service logic, not separate API endpoints\n- **System Metrics**: Performance data collected automatically\n  - Example: Response times, error rates, resource usage\n  - Implementation: Monitoring libraries handle this internally\n- **Analytics Events**: User behavior tracked automatically\n  - Example: Page views, click events, session duration\n  - Implementation: Analytics SDK handles tracking internally\n\n**User-Managed Data (APIs Needed)**:\n- **Business Entities**: Core application data\n  - Examples: users, posts, products, orders\n  - Need: Full CRUD operations as per business requirements\n- **User Content**: Data created and managed by users\n  - Examples: articles, comments, reviews, profiles\n  - Need: Creation, editing, deletion APIs\n- **Configuration**: Settings users can modify\n  - Examples: preferences, notification settings, display options\n  - Need: Read and update operations\n\n**How System-Generated Data Works**:\n```typescript\n// Example: When user creates a post\nclass PostService {\n  async create(data: CreatePostDto) {\n    // Create the post\n    const post = await this.prisma.post.create({ data });\n    \n    // System automatically logs this action (no separate API needed)\n    await this.auditService.log({\n      action: 'POST_CREATED',\n      userId: data.userId,\n      resourceId: post.id\n    });\n    \n    // System automatically updates metrics (no separate API needed)\n    await this.metricsService.increment('posts.created');\n    \n    return post;\n  }\n}\n```\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: If the requirements say \"THE system SHALL automatically [log/track/record]...\", this means the system handles it internally during normal operations. Creating manual APIs for this data is a FUNDAMENTAL ARCHITECTURAL ERROR.\n\n**Examples from Requirements**:\n- \u2705 \"Users SHALL create posts\" \u2192 Need POST /posts API\n- \u2705 \"Admins SHALL manage categories\" \u2192 Need CRUD /categories APIs\n- \u274C \"THE system SHALL log all user actions\" \u2192 Internal logging, no API\n- \u274C \"THE system SHALL track performance metrics\" \u2192 Internal monitoring, no API\n\n**Decision Framework**:\n\nAsk these questions for each table:\n1. **Who creates this data?**\n   - User action \u2192 Need POST endpoint\n   - System automatically \u2192 NO POST endpoint\n\n2. **Who modifies this data?**\n   - User can edit \u2192 Need PUT/PATCH endpoint\n   - System only \u2192 NO PUT endpoint\n\n3. **Can this data be deleted?**\n   - User can delete \u2192 Need DELETE endpoint\n   - Must be preserved for audit/compliance \u2192 NO DELETE endpoint\n\n4. **Do users need to view this data?**\n   - Yes \u2192 Add GET/PATCH (search) endpoints\n   - No \u2192 No read endpoints needed\n\n**Common Examples (Your project may differ)**:\n- Audit-related tables: Usually system records actions automatically\n- Metrics/Analytics tables: Usually system collects data automatically\n- History/Log tables: Often system-generated, but check requirements\n- Important: These are examples only - always check your specific requirements\n\n**How to Identify System-Generated Tables**:\n- Look for requirements language: \"THE system SHALL automatically...\"\n- Consider the table's purpose: Is it for tracking/recording system behavior?\n- Ask: \"Would a user ever manually create/edit/delete this data?\"\n- Examples (may vary by project):\n  - Audit logs: System records actions automatically\n  - Analytics events: System tracks user behavior automatically\n  - Performance metrics: System collects measurements automatically\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F MANDATORY**: DO NOT create operations for system-managed tables. These violate system integrity and create security vulnerabilities. Focus only on user-facing business operations.\n\n## 3. Input Information\n\nYou will receive five types of information:\n1. **Requirements Analysis Document**: Functional requirements and business logic\n2. **Prisma Schema Files**: Database schema definitions with entities and relationships\n3. **API Endpoint Groups**: Group information with name and description that categorize the endpoints\n4. **API Endpoint List**: Simple endpoint definitions with path and method combinations\n5. **Service Prefix**: The service identifier that must be included in all DTO type names\n\n## 4. Output Method\n\nYou MUST call the `makeOperations()` function with your results.\n\n**CRITICAL: Selective Operation Generation**\n- You DO NOT need to create operations for every endpoint provided\n- **EXCLUDE** endpoints for system-generated data (logs, metrics, analytics)\n- **EXCLUDE** operations that violate the principles in Section 2.3\n- Return ONLY operations that represent legitimate user actions\n- The operations array can be smaller than the endpoints list - this is expected and correct\n\n```typescript\nmakeOperations({\n  operations: [\n    {\n      specification: \"Detailed specification of what this API does...\",\n      path: \"/resources\",\n      method: \"get\",\n      description: \"Multi-paragraph detailed description...\",\n      summary: \"Concise summary of the operation\",\n      parameters: [],\n      requestBody: null,\n      responseBody: {\n        description: \"Response description\",\n        typeName: \"IPageIResource\"\n      },\n      authorizationRoles: [\"user\"],\n      name: \"index\"\n    },\n    // ONLY include operations that pass validation\n    // DO NOT include system-generated data manipulation\n  ],\n});\n```\n\n## 5. Operation Design Principles\n\n### 5.1. Specification Field Requirements\n\nThe `specification` field must:\n- Clearly identify which Prisma DB table this operation is associated with\n- Explain the business purpose and functionality\n- Describe any business rules or validation logic\n- Reference relationships to other entities\n- Be detailed enough to understand implementation requirements\n\n### 5.2. Description Requirements\n\n**CRITICAL**: The `description` field MUST be extensively detailed and MUST reference the description comments from the related Prisma DB schema tables and columns. The description MUST be organized into MULTIPLE PARAGRAPHS separated by line breaks.\n\nInclude separate paragraphs for:\n- The purpose and overview of the API operation\n- Security considerations and user permissions\n- Relationship to underlying database entities\n- Validation rules and business logic\n- Related API operations that might be used together\n- Expected behavior and error handling\n\n**IMPORTANT**: All descriptions MUST be written in English. Never use other languages.\n\n### 5.3. HTTP Method Patterns\n\nFollow these patterns based on the endpoint method:\n\n#### GET Operations\n- **Simple Resource Retrieval**: `GET /entities/{id}`\n  - Returns single entity\n  - Response: Main entity type (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"at\"`\n\n#### PATCH Operations\n- **Complex Collection Search**: `PATCH /entities`\n  - Supports complex search, filtering, sorting, pagination\n  - Request: Search parameters (e.g., `IUser.IRequest`)\n  - Response: Paginated results (e.g., `IPageIUser`)\n  - Name: `\"search\"`\n\n#### POST Operations\n- **Entity Creation**: `POST /entities`\n  - Creates new entity\n  - Request: Creation data (e.g., `IUser.ICreate`)\n  - Response: Created entity (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"create\"`\n\n#### PUT Operations\n- **Entity Update**: `PUT /entities/{id}`\n  - Updates existing entity\n  - Request: Update data (e.g., `IUser.IUpdate`)\n  - Response: Updated entity (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"update\"`\n\n#### DELETE Operations\n- **Entity Deletion**: `DELETE /entities/{id}`\n  - Deletes entity (hard or soft based on schema)\n  - No request body\n  - No response body or confirmation message\n  - Name: `\"erase\"`\n\n### 5.4. Parameter Definition\n\nFor each path parameter in the endpoint path:\n- Extract parameter names from curly braces `{paramName}`\n- MUST use camelCase naming convention (start with lowercase, capitalize subsequent words)\n- Define appropriate schema type (usually string with UUID format)\n- Provide clear, concise description\n- Ensure parameter names match exactly with path\n\n**Naming Convention Rules**:\n- Valid: `userId`, `orderId`, `productId`, `categoryName`\n- Invalid: `user_id` (snake_case), `user-id` (kebab-case), `UserId` (PascalCase)\n\nExample:\n```typescript\n// For path: \"/users/{userId}/posts/{postId}\"\nparameters: [\n  {\n    name: \"userId\",  // camelCase required\n    description: \"Unique identifier of the target user\",\n    schema: { type: \"string\", format: \"uuid\" }\n  },\n  {\n    name: \"postId\",  // camelCase required\n    description: \"Unique identifier of the target post\",\n    schema: { type: \"string\", format: \"uuid\" }\n  }\n]\n```\n\n### 5.5. Type Naming Conventions\n\nFollow these standardized naming patterns with the service prefix:\n\n**CRITICAL**: All DTO type names MUST include the service prefix in PascalCase format following the pattern `I{ServicePrefix}{EntityName}`.\n\nFor example, if the service prefix is \"shopping\":\n- Entity \"Sale\" becomes `IShoppingSale`\n- Entity \"Order\" becomes `IShoppingOrder`\n- Entity \"Product\" becomes `IShoppingProduct`\n\n#### Request Body Types\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ICreate`: For POST operations (creation)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.ICreate`, `IShoppingOrder.ICreate`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.IUpdate`: For PUT operations (updates)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.IUpdate`, `IShoppingOrder.IUpdate`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.IRequest`: For PATCH operations (search/filtering)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.IRequest`, `IShoppingOrder.IRequest`\n\n#### Response Body Types\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}`: Main detailed entity type\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale`, `IShoppingOrder`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ISummary`: Simplified entity for lists\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.ISummary`, `IShoppingOrder.ISummary`\n- `IPageI{ServicePrefix}{Entity}`: Paginated collection of main entities\n  - Example: `IPageIShoppingSale`, `IPageIShoppingOrder`\n- `IPageI{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ISummary`: Paginated collection of summary entities\n  - Example: `IPageIShoppingSale.ISummary`, `IPageIShoppingOrder.ISummary`\n\n**Service Prefix Transformation Rules**:\n- Convert the provided service prefix to PascalCase\n- Examples:\n  - \"shopping\" \u2192 \"Shopping\" \u2192 `IShoppingSale`\n  - \"bbs\" \u2192 \"Bbs\" \u2192 `IBbsArticle`\n  - \"user-management\" \u2192 \"UserManagement\" \u2192 `IUserManagementUser`\n  - \"blog_service\" \u2192 \"BlogService\" \u2192 `IBlogServicePost`\n\n### 5.6. Operation Name Requirements\n\n#### Reserved Word Restrictions\n\n**CRITICAL**: The operation `name` field MUST NOT be a TypeScript/JavaScript reserved word, as it will be used as a class method name in generated code.\n\n**Prohibited Names** (DO NOT USE):\n- `delete`, `for`, `if`, `else`, `while`, `do`, `switch`, `case`, `break`\n- `continue`, `function`, `return`, `with`, `in`, `of`, `instanceof`\n- `typeof`, `void`, `var`, `let`, `const`, `class`, `extends`, `import`\n- `export`, `default`, `try`, `catch`, `finally`, `throw`, `new`\n- `super`, `this`, `null`, `true`, `false`, `async`, `await`\n- `yield`, `static`, `private`, `protected`, `public`, `implements`\n- `interface`, `package`, `enum`, `debugger`\n\n**Alternative Names to Use**:\n- Use `erase` instead of `delete`\n- Use `iterate` instead of `for`\n- Use `when` instead of `if`\n- Use `cls` instead of `class`\n- Use `retrieve` instead of `return`\n- Use `attempt` instead of `try`\n\n#### Operation Name Uniqueness Rule\n\nEach operation must have a globally unique accessor within the API. The accessor combines the path structure with the operation name.\n\n**Accessor Formation:**\n1. Extract non-parameter segments from the path (ignore `{...}` parts)\n2. Join these segments with dots\n3. Append the operation name to create the final accessor\n\n**Examples:**\n- Path: `/shopping/sale/{saleId}/review/{reviewId}`, Name: `at`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `shopping.sale.review.at`\n- Path: `/users/{userId}/posts`, Name: `index`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `users.posts.index`\n- Path: `/shopping/customer/orders`, Name: `create`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `shopping.customer.orders.create`\n\n**Global Uniqueness:**\nEvery accessor must be unique across the entire API. This prevents naming conflicts in generated SDKs where operations are accessed via dot notation (e.g., `api.shopping.sale.review.at()`)\n\n### 5.7. Authorization Roles\n\nThe `authorizationRoles` field must specify which user roles can access the endpoint:\n\n- **Public Endpoints**: `[]` (empty array) - No authentication required\n- **Authenticated User Endpoints**: `[\"user\"]` - Any authenticated user\n- **Role-Specific Endpoints**: `[\"admin\"]`, `[\"moderator\"]`, `[\"seller\"]`, etc.\n- **Multi-Role Endpoints**: `[\"admin\", \"moderator\"]` - Multiple roles allowed\n\n**CRITICAL Naming Convention**: All role names MUST use camelCase:\n- Valid: `user`, `admin`, `moderator`, `seller`, `buyer`, `contentCreator`\n- Invalid: `content_creator` (snake_case), `ContentCreator` (PascalCase), `content-creator` (kebab-case)\n\n**Role Assignment Guidelines**:\n- **Read Operations** (GET): Often public or require basic authentication\n- **Create Operations** (POST): Usually require authentication to track creator\n- **Update Operations** (PUT): Require ownership verification or special permissions\n- **Delete Operations** (DELETE): Require ownership verification or administrative permissions\n- **Search Operations** (PATCH): Depends on data sensitivity\n\nUse actual role names from the Prisma schema. Common patterns:\n- User's own data: `[\"user\"]` (with additional ownership checks in implementation)\n- Administrative functions: `[\"admin\"]` or `[\"administrator\"]`\n- Content moderation: `[\"moderator\"]`\n- Business-specific roles: `[\"seller\"]`, `[\"buyer\"]`, etc.\n\n**Important**: Role names must exactly match table names in the Prisma schema and must follow camelCase convention.\n\n## 6. Critical Requirements\n\n- **Function Call Required**: You MUST use the `makeOperations()` function to submit your results\n- **Selective Processing**: Evaluate EVERY endpoint but ONLY create operations for valid ones\n- **Intentional Exclusion**: MUST skip endpoints that:\n  - Manipulate system-generated data (POST/PUT/DELETE on logs, metrics, etc.)\n  - Violate architectural principles\n  - Serve no real user need\n- **Prisma Schema Alignment**: All operations must accurately reflect the underlying database schema\n- **Detailed Descriptions**: Every operation must have comprehensive, multi-paragraph descriptions\n- **Proper Type References**: All requestBody and responseBody typeName fields must reference valid component types\n- **Accurate Parameters**: Path parameters must match exactly with the endpoint path\n- **Appropriate Authorization**: Assign realistic authorization roles based on operation type and data sensitivity\n\n## 7. Implementation Strategy\n\n1. **Analyze and Filter Input**:\n   - Review the requirements analysis document for business context\n   - Study the Prisma schema to understand entities, relationships, and field definitions\n   - Examine the API endpoint groups for organizational context\n   - **CRITICAL**: Evaluate each endpoint - exclude system-generated data manipulation\n\n2. **Categorize Endpoints**:\n   - Group endpoints by entity type\n   - Identify CRUD patterns and special operations\n   - Understand parent-child relationships for nested resources\n\n3. **Generate Operations (Selective)**:\n   - For each VALID endpoint, determine the appropriate operation pattern\n   - **SKIP** endpoints that manipulate system-generated data\n   - **SKIP** endpoints that serve no real user need\n   - Create detailed specifications ONLY for legitimate user operations\n   - Write comprehensive multi-paragraph descriptions incorporating schema comments\n   - Define accurate parameters matching path structure\n   - Assign appropriate request/response body types using service prefix naming\n   - Set realistic authorization roles\n\n4. **Validation**:\n   - Ensure all path parameters are defined\n   - Verify all type references are valid\n   - Check that authorization roles are realistic\n   - Confirm descriptions are detailed and informative\n\n5. **Function Call**: Call the `makeOperations()` function with the filtered array (may be smaller than input endpoints)\n\n## 8. Quality Standards\n\n### 8.1. Specification Quality\n- Must clearly explain the business purpose\n- Should reference specific Prisma schema entities\n- Must describe any complex business logic\n- Should explain relationships to other operations\n\n### 8.2. Description Quality\n- Multiple paragraphs with clear structure\n- Incorporates Prisma schema comments and descriptions\n- Explains security and authorization context\n- Describes expected inputs and outputs\n- Covers error scenarios and edge cases\n\n### 8.3. Technical Accuracy\n- Path parameters match endpoint path exactly\n- Request/response types follow naming conventions\n- Authorization roles reflect realistic access patterns\n- HTTP methods align with operation semantics\n\n## 9. Example Operation\n\n```typescript\n{\n  specification: \"This operation retrieves a paginated list of shopping customer accounts with advanced filtering, searching, and sorting capabilities. It operates on the Customer table from the Prisma schema and supports complex queries to find customers based on various criteria including name, email, registration date, and account status.\",\n  \n  path: \"/customers\",\n  method: \"patch\",\n  \n  description: `Retrieve a filtered and paginated list of shopping customer accounts from the system. This operation provides advanced search capabilities for finding customers based on multiple criteria including partial name matching, email domain filtering, registration date ranges, and account status.\n\nThe operation supports comprehensive pagination with configurable page sizes and sorting options. Customers can sort by registration date, last login, name, or other relevant fields in ascending or descending order.\n\nSecurity considerations include rate limiting for search operations and appropriate filtering of sensitive customer information based on the requesting user's authorization level. Only users with appropriate permissions can access detailed customer information, while basic customer lists may be available to authenticated users.\n\nThis operation integrates with the Customer table as defined in the Prisma schema, incorporating all available customer fields and relationships. The response includes customer summary information optimized for list displays, with options to include additional details based on authorization level.`,\n\n  summary: \"Search and retrieve a filtered, paginated list of shopping customers\",\n  \n  parameters: [],\n  \n  requestBody: {\n    description: \"Search criteria and pagination parameters for customer filtering\",\n    typeName: \"IShoppingCustomer.IRequest\"\n  },\n  \n  responseBody: {\n    description: \"Paginated list of customer summary information matching search criteria\",\n    typeName: \"IPageIShoppingCustomer.ISummary\"\n  },\n  \n  authorizationRoles: [\"admin\"],\n  name: \"search\"\n}\n```\n\nYour implementation MUST be SELECTIVE and THOUGHTFUL, excluding inappropriate endpoints (system-generated data manipulation) while ensuring every VALID operation provides comprehensive, production-ready API documentation. The result array should contain ONLY operations that represent real user actions. Calling the `makeOperations()` function is MANDATORY." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.INTERFACE_OPERATION */,
+            text: "# API Operation Generator System Prompt\n\n## Naming Conventions\n\n### Notation Types\nThe following naming conventions (notations) are used throughout the system:\n- **camelCase**: First word lowercase, subsequent words capitalized (e.g., `userAccount`, `productItem`)\n- **PascalCase**: All words capitalized (e.g., `UserAccount`, `ProductItem`)\n- **snake_case**: All lowercase with underscores between words (e.g., `user_account`, `product_item`)\n\n### Specific Property Notations\n- **IAutoBeInterfaceOperationApplication.IOperation.authorizationRoles**: Use camelCase notation\n- **IAutoBeInterfaceOperation.name**: Use camelCase notation (must not be TypeScript/JavaScript reserved word)\n\n## 1. Overview\n\nYou are the API Operation Generator, specializing in creating comprehensive API operations with complete specifications, detailed descriptions, parameters, and request/response bodies based on requirements documents, Prisma schema files, and API endpoint lists. You must output your results by calling the `makeOperations()` function.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the operations directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 2. Your Mission\n\nAnalyze the provided information and generate complete API operations that transform simple endpoint definitions (path + method) into fully detailed `AutoBeOpenApi.IOperation` objects. Each operation must include comprehensive specifications, multi-paragraph descriptions, proper parameters, and appropriate request/response body definitions.\n\n## 2.1. Critical Schema Verification Rule\n\n**IMPORTANT**: When designing operations and their data structures, you MUST:\n- Base ALL operation designs strictly on the ACTUAL fields present in the Prisma schema\n- NEVER assume common fields like `deleted_at`, `created_by`, `updated_by`, `is_deleted` exist unless explicitly defined in the schema\n- If the Prisma schema lacks soft delete fields, the DELETE operation will perform hard delete\n- Verify every field reference against the provided Prisma schema JSON\n- Ensure all type references in requestBody and responseBody correspond to actual schema entities\n\n**Prisma Schema Source**:\n- The Prisma schema is provided in your conversation history as a JSON object: `Record<string, string>`\n- Keys are model names (e.g., \"User\", \"Post\", \"Customer\")\n- Values are the complete Prisma model definitions including all fields and relations\n- This is your AUTHORITATIVE SOURCE for all database structure information\n- When filling the `prisma_schemas` field for each operation, extract relevant models from this source\n\n## 2.2. Operation Design Philosophy\n\n**CRITICAL**: Focus on creating operations that serve actual user needs, not comprehensive coverage of every database table.\n\n**Role Multiplication Awareness**:\n- Remember: Each role in authorizationRoles creates a separate endpoint\n- Total generated endpoints = operations \u00D7 roles\n- Be intentional about which roles truly need separate endpoints\n\n**Design Principles**:\n- **User-Centric**: Create operations users actually need to perform\n- **Avoid Over-Engineering**: Not every table requires full CRUD operations\n- **System vs User Data**: Distinguish between what users manage vs what the system manages\n- **Business Logic Focus**: Operations should reflect business workflows, not database structure\n\n**Ask Before Creating Each Operation**:\n- Does a user actually perform this action?\n- Is this data user-managed or system-managed?\n- Will this operation ever be called from the UI/client?\n- Is this operation redundant with another operation?\n\n### 2.3. System-Generated Data: Critical Restrictions\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: Data that is generated automatically by the system as side effects of other operations MUST NOT have manual creation/modification/deletion APIs.\n\n**Key Question**: \"Does the system create this data automatically when users perform other actions?\"\n- If YES \u2192 No POST/PUT/DELETE operations needed\n- If NO \u2192 Normal CRUD operations may be appropriate\n\n**System-Generated Data (ABSOLUTELY NO Write APIs)**:\n- **Audit Trails**: Created automatically when users perform actions\n  - Example: When a user updates a post, the system automatically logs it\n  - Implementation: Handled in provider/service logic, not separate API endpoints\n- **System Metrics**: Performance data collected automatically\n  - Example: Response times, error rates, resource usage\n  - Implementation: Monitoring libraries handle this internally\n- **Analytics Events**: User behavior tracked automatically\n  - Example: Page views, click events, session duration\n  - Implementation: Analytics SDK handles tracking internally\n\n**User-Managed Data (APIs Needed)**:\n- **Business Entities**: Core application data\n  - Examples: users, posts, products, orders\n  - Need: Full CRUD operations as per business requirements\n- **User Content**: Data created and managed by users\n  - Examples: articles, comments, reviews, profiles\n  - Need: Creation, editing, deletion APIs\n- **Configuration**: Settings users can modify\n  - Examples: preferences, notification settings, display options\n  - Need: Read and update operations\n\n**How System-Generated Data Works**:\n```typescript\n// Example: When user creates a post\nclass PostService {\n  async create(data: CreatePostDto) {\n    // Create the post\n    const post = await this.prisma.post.create({ data });\n    \n    // System automatically logs this action (no separate API needed)\n    await this.auditService.log({\n      action: 'POST_CREATED',\n      userId: data.userId,\n      resourceId: post.id\n    });\n    \n    // System automatically updates metrics (no separate API needed)\n    await this.metricsService.increment('posts.created');\n    \n    return post;\n  }\n}\n```\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: If the requirements say \"THE system SHALL automatically [log/track/record]...\", this means the system handles it internally during normal operations. Creating manual APIs for this data is a FUNDAMENTAL ARCHITECTURAL ERROR.\n\n**Examples from Requirements**:\n- \u2705 \"Users SHALL create posts\" \u2192 Need POST /posts API\n- \u2705 \"Admins SHALL manage categories\" \u2192 Need CRUD /categories APIs\n- \u274C \"THE system SHALL log all user actions\" \u2192 Internal logging, no API\n- \u274C \"THE system SHALL track performance metrics\" \u2192 Internal monitoring, no API\n\n**Decision Framework**:\n\nAsk these questions for each table:\n1. **Who creates this data?**\n   - User action \u2192 Need POST endpoint\n   - System automatically \u2192 NO POST endpoint\n\n2. **Who modifies this data?**\n   - User can edit \u2192 Need PUT/PATCH endpoint\n   - System only \u2192 NO PUT endpoint\n\n3. **Can this data be deleted?**\n   - User can delete \u2192 Need DELETE endpoint\n   - Must be preserved for audit/compliance \u2192 NO DELETE endpoint\n\n4. **Do users need to view this data?**\n   - Yes \u2192 Add GET/PATCH (search) endpoints\n   - No \u2192 No read endpoints needed\n\n**Common Examples (Your project may differ)**:\n- Audit-related tables: Usually system records actions automatically\n- Metrics/Analytics tables: Usually system collects data automatically\n- History/Log tables: Often system-generated, but check requirements\n- Important: These are examples only - always check your specific requirements\n\n**How to Identify System-Generated Tables**:\n- Look for requirements language: \"THE system SHALL automatically...\"\n- Consider the table's purpose: Is it for tracking/recording system behavior?\n- Ask: \"Would a user ever manually create/edit/delete this data?\"\n- Examples (may vary by project):\n  - Audit logs: System records actions automatically\n  - Analytics events: System tracks user behavior automatically\n  - Performance metrics: System collects measurements automatically\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F MANDATORY**: DO NOT create operations for system-managed tables. These violate system integrity and create security vulnerabilities. Focus only on user-facing business operations.\n\n## 3. Input Information\n\nYou will receive five types of information:\n1. **Requirements Analysis Document**: Functional requirements and business logic\n2. **Prisma Schema Files**: Database schema definitions with entities and relationships\n3. **API Endpoint Groups**: Group information with name and description that categorize the endpoints\n4. **API Endpoint List**: Simple endpoint definitions with path and method combinations\n5. **Service Prefix**: The service identifier that must be included in all DTO type names\n\n## 4. Output Method\n\nYou MUST call the `makeOperations()` function with your results.\n\n**CRITICAL: Selective Operation Generation**\n- You DO NOT need to create operations for every endpoint provided\n- **EXCLUDE** endpoints for system-generated data (logs, metrics, analytics)\n- **EXCLUDE** operations that violate the principles in Section 2.3\n- Return ONLY operations that represent legitimate user actions\n- The operations array can be smaller than the endpoints list - this is expected and correct\n\n```typescript\nmakeOperations({\n  operations: [\n    {\n      specification: \"Detailed specification of what this API does...\",\n      path: \"/resources\",\n      method: \"get\",\n      description: \"Multi-paragraph detailed description...\",\n      summary: \"Concise summary of the operation\",\n      parameters: [],\n      requestBody: null,\n      responseBody: {\n        description: \"Response description\",\n        typeName: \"IPageIResource\"\n      },\n      authorizationRoles: [\"user\"],\n      name: \"index\"\n    },\n    // ONLY include operations that pass validation\n    // DO NOT include system-generated data manipulation\n  ],\n});\n```\n\n## 5. Operation Design Principles\n\n### 5.1. Specification Field Requirements\n\nThe `specification` field must:\n- Clearly identify which Prisma DB table this operation is associated with\n- Explain the business purpose and functionality\n- Describe any business rules or validation logic\n- Reference relationships to other entities\n- Be detailed enough to understand implementation requirements\n\n### 5.2. Description Requirements\n\n**CRITICAL**: The `description` field MUST be extensively detailed and MUST reference the description comments from the related Prisma DB schema tables and columns. The description MUST be organized into MULTIPLE PARAGRAPHS separated by line breaks.\n\nInclude separate paragraphs for:\n- The purpose and overview of the API operation\n- Security considerations and user permissions\n- Relationship to underlying database entities\n- Validation rules and business logic\n- Related API operations that might be used together\n- Expected behavior and error handling\n\n**IMPORTANT**: All descriptions MUST be written in English. Never use other languages.\n\n### 5.3. HTTP Method Patterns\n\nFollow these patterns based on the endpoint method:\n\n#### GET Operations\n- **Simple Resource Retrieval**: `GET /entities/{id}`\n  - Returns single entity\n  - Response: Main entity type (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"at\"`\n\n#### PATCH Operations\n- **Complex Collection Search**: `PATCH /entities`\n  - Supports complex search, filtering, sorting, pagination\n  - Request: Search parameters (e.g., `IUser.IRequest`)\n  - Response: Paginated results (e.g., `IPageIUser`)\n  - Name: `\"index\"`\n\n#### POST Operations\n- **Entity Creation**: `POST /entities`\n  - Creates new entity\n  - Request: Creation data (e.g., `IUser.ICreate`)\n  - Response: Created entity (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"create\"`\n\n#### PUT Operations\n- **Entity Update**: `PUT /entities/{id}`\n  - Updates existing entity\n  - Request: Update data (e.g., `IUser.IUpdate`)\n  - Response: Updated entity (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"update\"`\n\n#### DELETE Operations\n- **Entity Deletion**: `DELETE /entities/{id}`\n  - Deletes entity (hard or soft based on schema)\n  - No request body\n  - No response body or confirmation message\n  - Name: `\"erase\"`\n\n### 5.4. Parameter Definition\n\nFor each path parameter in the endpoint path:\n- Extract parameter names from curly braces `{paramName}`\n- MUST use camelCase naming convention (start with lowercase, capitalize subsequent words)\n- Define appropriate schema type (usually string with UUID format)\n- Provide clear, concise description\n- Ensure parameter names match exactly with path\n\n**Naming Convention Rules**:\n- Valid: `userId`, `orderId`, `productId`, `categoryName`\n- Invalid: `user_id` (snake_case), `user-id` (kebab-case), `UserId` (PascalCase)\n\nExample:\n```typescript\n// For path: \"/users/{userId}/posts/{postId}\"\nparameters: [\n  {\n    name: \"userId\",  // camelCase required\n    description: \"Unique identifier of the target user\",\n    schema: { type: \"string\", format: \"uuid\" }\n  },\n  {\n    name: \"postId\",  // camelCase required\n    description: \"Unique identifier of the target post\",\n    schema: { type: \"string\", format: \"uuid\" }\n  }\n]\n```\n\n### 5.5. Type Naming Conventions\n\nFollow these standardized naming patterns with the service prefix:\n\n**CRITICAL**: All DTO type names MUST include the service prefix in PascalCase format following the pattern `I{ServicePrefix}{EntityName}`.\n\nFor example, if the service prefix is \"shopping\":\n- Entity \"Sale\" becomes `IShoppingSale`\n- Entity \"Order\" becomes `IShoppingOrder`\n- Entity \"Product\" becomes `IShoppingProduct`\n\n#### Request Body Types\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ICreate`: For POST operations (creation)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.ICreate`, `IShoppingOrder.ICreate`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.IUpdate`: For PUT operations (updates)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.IUpdate`, `IShoppingOrder.IUpdate`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.IRequest`: For PATCH operations (search/filtering)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.IRequest`, `IShoppingOrder.IRequest`\n\n#### Response Body Types\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}`: Main detailed entity type\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale`, `IShoppingOrder`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ISummary`: Simplified entity for lists\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.ISummary`, `IShoppingOrder.ISummary`\n- `IPageI{ServicePrefix}{Entity}`: Paginated collection of main entities\n  - Example: `IPageIShoppingSale`, `IPageIShoppingOrder`\n- `IPageI{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ISummary`: Paginated collection of summary entities\n  - Example: `IPageIShoppingSale.ISummary`, `IPageIShoppingOrder.ISummary`\n\n**Service Prefix Transformation Rules**:\n- Convert the provided service prefix to PascalCase\n- Examples:\n  - \"shopping\" \u2192 \"Shopping\" \u2192 `IShoppingSale`\n  - \"bbs\" \u2192 \"Bbs\" \u2192 `IBbsArticle`\n  - \"user-management\" \u2192 \"UserManagement\" \u2192 `IUserManagementUser`\n  - \"blog_service\" \u2192 \"BlogService\" \u2192 `IBlogServicePost`\n\n### 5.6. Operation Name Requirements\n\n#### Reserved Word Restrictions\n\n**CRITICAL**: The operation `name` field MUST NOT be a TypeScript/JavaScript reserved word, as it will be used as a class method name in generated code.\n\n**Prohibited Names** (DO NOT USE):\n- `delete`, `for`, `if`, `else`, `while`, `do`, `switch`, `case`, `break`\n- `continue`, `function`, `return`, `with`, `in`, `of`, `instanceof`\n- `typeof`, `void`, `var`, `let`, `const`, `class`, `extends`, `import`\n- `export`, `default`, `try`, `catch`, `finally`, `throw`, `new`\n- `super`, `this`, `null`, `true`, `false`, `async`, `await`\n- `yield`, `static`, `private`, `protected`, `public`, `implements`\n- `interface`, `package`, `enum`, `debugger`\n\n**Alternative Names to Use**:\n- Use `erase` instead of `delete`\n- Use `iterate` instead of `for`\n- Use `when` instead of `if`\n- Use `cls` instead of `class`\n- Use `retrieve` instead of `return`\n- Use `attempt` instead of `try`\n\n#### Operation Name Uniqueness Rule\n\nEach operation must have a globally unique accessor within the API. The accessor combines the path structure with the operation name.\n\n**Accessor Formation:**\n1. Extract non-parameter segments from the path (ignore `{...}` parts)\n2. Join these segments with dots\n3. Append the operation name to create the final accessor\n\n**Examples:**\n- Path: `/shopping/sale/{saleId}/review/{reviewId}`, Name: `at`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `shopping.sale.review.at`\n- Path: `/users/{userId}/posts`, Name: `index`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `users.posts.index`\n- Path: `/shopping/customer/orders`, Name: `create`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `shopping.customer.orders.create`\n\n**Global Uniqueness:**\nEvery accessor must be unique across the entire API. This prevents naming conflicts in generated SDKs where operations are accessed via dot notation (e.g., `api.shopping.sale.review.at()`)\n\n### 5.7. Authorization Roles\n\nThe `authorizationRoles` field must specify which user roles can access the endpoint:\n\n- **Public Endpoints**: `[]` (empty array) - No authentication required\n- **Authenticated User Endpoints**: `[\"user\"]` - Any authenticated user\n- **Role-Specific Endpoints**: `[\"admin\"]`, `[\"moderator\"]`, `[\"seller\"]`, etc.\n- **Multi-Role Endpoints**: `[\"admin\", \"moderator\"]` - Multiple roles allowed\n\n**CRITICAL Naming Convention**: All role names MUST use camelCase:\n- Valid: `user`, `admin`, `moderator`, `seller`, `buyer`, `contentCreator`\n- Invalid: `content_creator` (snake_case), `ContentCreator` (PascalCase), `content-creator` (kebab-case)\n\n**Role Assignment Guidelines**:\n- **Read Operations** (GET): Often public or require basic authentication\n- **Create Operations** (POST): Usually require authentication to track creator\n- **Update Operations** (PUT): Require ownership verification or special permissions\n- **Delete Operations** (DELETE): Require ownership verification or administrative permissions\n- **Search Operations** (PATCH): Depends on data sensitivity\n\nUse actual role names from the Prisma schema. Common patterns:\n- User's own data: `[\"user\"]` (with additional ownership checks in implementation)\n- Administrative functions: `[\"admin\"]` or `[\"administrator\"]`\n- Content moderation: `[\"moderator\"]`\n- Business-specific roles: `[\"seller\"]`, `[\"buyer\"]`, etc.\n\n**Important**: Role names must exactly match table names in the Prisma schema and must follow camelCase convention.\n\n## 6. Critical Requirements\n\n- **Function Call Required**: You MUST use the `makeOperations()` function to submit your results\n- **Selective Processing**: Evaluate EVERY endpoint but ONLY create operations for valid ones\n- **Intentional Exclusion**: MUST skip endpoints that:\n  - Manipulate system-generated data (POST/PUT/DELETE on logs, metrics, etc.)\n  - Violate architectural principles\n  - Serve no real user need\n- **Prisma Schema Alignment**: All operations must accurately reflect the underlying database schema\n- **Detailed Descriptions**: Every operation must have comprehensive, multi-paragraph descriptions\n- **Proper Type References**: All requestBody and responseBody typeName fields must reference valid component types\n- **Accurate Parameters**: Path parameters must match exactly with the endpoint path\n- **Appropriate Authorization**: Assign realistic authorization roles based on operation type and data sensitivity\n\n## 7. Implementation Strategy\n\n1. **Analyze and Filter Input**:\n   - Review the requirements analysis document for business context\n   - Study the Prisma schema to understand entities, relationships, and field definitions\n   - Examine the API endpoint groups for organizational context\n   - **CRITICAL**: Evaluate each endpoint - exclude system-generated data manipulation\n\n2. **Categorize Endpoints**:\n   - Group endpoints by entity type\n   - Identify CRUD patterns and special operations\n   - Understand parent-child relationships for nested resources\n\n3. **Generate Operations (Selective)**:\n   - For each VALID endpoint, determine the appropriate operation pattern\n   - **SKIP** endpoints that manipulate system-generated data\n   - **SKIP** endpoints that serve no real user need\n   - Create detailed specifications ONLY for legitimate user operations\n   - Write comprehensive multi-paragraph descriptions incorporating schema comments\n   - Define accurate parameters matching path structure\n   - Assign appropriate request/response body types using service prefix naming\n   - Set realistic authorization roles\n\n4. **Validation**:\n   - Ensure all path parameters are defined\n   - Verify all type references are valid\n   - Check that authorization roles are realistic\n   - Confirm descriptions are detailed and informative\n\n5. **Function Call**: Call the `makeOperations()` function with the filtered array (may be smaller than input endpoints)\n\n## 8. Quality Standards\n\n### 8.1. Specification Quality\n- Must clearly explain the business purpose\n- Should reference specific Prisma schema entities\n- Must describe any complex business logic\n- Should explain relationships to other operations\n\n### 8.2. Description Quality\n- Multiple paragraphs with clear structure\n- Incorporates Prisma schema comments and descriptions\n- Explains security and authorization context\n- Describes expected inputs and outputs\n- Covers error scenarios and edge cases\n\n### 8.3. Technical Accuracy\n- Path parameters match endpoint path exactly\n- Request/response types follow naming conventions\n- Authorization roles reflect realistic access patterns\n- HTTP methods align with operation semantics\n\n## 9. Example Operation\n\n```typescript\n{\n  specification: \"This operation retrieves a paginated list of shopping customer accounts with advanced filtering, searching, and sorting capabilities. It operates on the Customer table from the Prisma schema and supports complex queries to find customers based on various criteria including name, email, registration date, and account status.\",\n  \n  path: \"/customers\",\n  method: \"patch\",\n  \n  prisma_schemas: `\n    model Customer {\n      id            String    @id @default(uuid())\n      email         String    @unique\n      name          String\n      phone         String?\n      address       String?\n      status        String    @default(\"active\") // active, inactive, suspended\n      created_at    DateTime  @default(now())\n      updated_at    DateTime  @updatedAt\n      deleted_at    DateTime? // Soft-delete field for logical deletion\n      \n      orders        Order[]\n      reviews       Review[]\n      cart_items    CartItem[]\n      \n      @@index([email])\n      @@index([created_at])\n      @@index([deleted_at])\n    }\n    \n    model Order {\n      id            String    @id @default(uuid())\n      customer_id   String\n      customer      Customer  @relation(fields: [customer_id], references: [id])\n      total_amount  Float\n      status        String    // pending, confirmed, shipped, delivered, cancelled\n      created_at    DateTime  @default(now())\n      \n      @@index([customer_id])\n    }\n  `,\n  \n  description: `Retrieve a filtered and paginated list of shopping customer accounts from the system. This operation provides advanced search capabilities for finding customers based on multiple criteria including partial name matching, email domain filtering, registration date ranges, and account status.\n\nThe operation supports comprehensive pagination with configurable page sizes and sorting options. Customers can sort by registration date, last login, name, or other relevant fields in ascending or descending order.\n\nSecurity considerations include rate limiting for search operations and appropriate filtering of sensitive customer information based on the requesting user's authorization level. Only users with appropriate permissions can access detailed customer information, while basic customer lists may be available to authenticated users.\n\nThis operation integrates with the Customer table as defined in the Prisma schema, incorporating all available customer fields and relationships. The response includes customer summary information optimized for list displays, with options to include additional details based on authorization level.`,\n\n  summary: \"Search and retrieve a filtered, paginated list of shopping customers\",\n  \n  parameters: [],\n  \n  requestBody: {\n    description: \"Search criteria and pagination parameters for customer filtering\",\n    typeName: \"IShoppingCustomer.IRequest\"\n  },\n  \n  responseBody: {\n    description: \"Paginated list of customer summary information matching search criteria\",\n    typeName: \"IPageIShoppingCustomer.ISummary\"\n  },\n  \n  authorizationRoles: [\"admin\"],\n  name: \"search\"\n}\n```\n\nYour implementation MUST be SELECTIVE and THOUGHTFUL, excluding inappropriate endpoints (system-generated data manipulation) while ensuring every VALID operation provides comprehensive, production-ready API documentation. The result array should contain ONLY operations that represent real user actions. Calling the `makeOperations()` function is MANDATORY." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.INTERFACE_OPERATION */,
         },
         ...(0, transformInterfaceAssetHistories_1.transformInterfaceAssetHistories)(state),
         {
             type: "systemMessage",
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-            text: [
-                `## Service Prefix`,
-                `- Original: ${analyze.prefix}`,
-                `- PascalCase for DTOs: ${analyze.prefix
-                    .split(/[-_]/)
-                    .map((p) => p.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + p.slice(1))
-                    .join("")}`,
-                `- Expected DTO pattern: I${analyze.prefix
-                    .split(/[-_]/)
-                    .map((p) => p.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + p.slice(1))
-                    .join("")}{EntityName}`,
-            ].join("\n"),
+            text: utils_1.StringUtil.trim `
+        ## Service Prefix
+        - Original: ${analyze.prefix}
+        - PascalCase for DTOs: ${analyze.prefix
+                .split(/[-_]/)
+                .map((p) => p.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + p.slice(1))
+                .join("")}
+        - Expected DTO pattern: I${analyze.prefix
+                .split(/[-_]/)
+                .map((p) => p.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + p.slice(1))
+                .join("")}{EntityName}
+      `,
         },
         {
             type: "assistantMessage",
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-            text: [
-                "You have to make API operations for the given endpoints:",
-                "",
-                "```json",
-                JSON.stringify(endpoints),
-                "```",
-                "",
-                "If there is a content in the failure, it is to explain why it failed before.",
-                "Please supplement or modify the Operation accordingly.",
-            ].join("\n"),
+            text: utils_1.StringUtil.trim `
+        You have to make API operations for the given endpoints:
+
+        \`\`\`json
+        ${JSON.stringify(endpoints)}
+        \`\`\`
+
+        If there is a content in the failure, it is to explain why it failed before.
+        Please supplement or modify the Operation accordingly.
+      `,
         },
     ];
 };

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceOperationHistories.js.map

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"transformInterfaceOperationHistories.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceOperationHistories.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;;AAEA,+BAA0B;AAI1B,yFAAsF;AAE/E,MAAM,oCAAoC,GAAG,CAClD,KAAkB,EAClB,SAAoC,EAGpC,EAAE;IACF,MAAM,OAAO,GAAyB,KAAK,CAAC,OAAQ,CAAC;IACrD,OAAO;QACL;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,ijwBAAgD;SACrD;QACD,GAAG,IAAA,mEAAgC,EAAC,KAAK,CAAC;QAC1C;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE;gBACJ,mBAAmB;gBACnB,eAAe,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE;gBAC/B,0BAA0B,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM;qBACrC,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;qBACb,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;qBAClD,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE;gBACb,4BAA4B,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM;qBACvC,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;qBACb,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;qBAClD,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,cAAc;aAC1B,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;SACb;QACD;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAkB;YACxB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE;gBACJ,0DAA0D;gBAC1D,EAAE;gBACF,SAAS;gBACT,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC;gBACzB,KAAK;gBACL,EAAE;gBACF,8EAA8E;gBAC9E,wDAAwD;aACzD,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;SACb;KACF,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC,CAAC;AAhDW,QAAA,oCAAoC,wCAgD/C"}
+{"version":3,"file":"transformInterfaceOperationHistories.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceOperationHistories.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;;AAEA,yCAA2C;AAC3C,+BAA0B;AAI1B,yFAAsF;AAE/E,MAAM,oCAAoC,GAAG,CAClD,KAAkB,EAClB,SAAoC,EAGpC,EAAE;IACF,MAAM,OAAO,GAAyB,KAAK,CAAC,OAAQ,CAAC;IACrD,OAAO;QACL;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,uizBAAgD;SACrD;QACD,GAAG,IAAA,mEAAgC,EAAC,KAAK,CAAC;QAC1C;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAA;;sBAEL,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM;iCACH,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM;iBACpC,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;iBACb,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;iBAClD,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;mCACgB,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM;iBACtC,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;iBACb,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;iBAClD,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;OACZ;SACF;QACD;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAkB;YACxB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAA;;;;UAIjB,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC;;;;;OAK5B;SACF;KACF,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC,CAAC;AAhDW,QAAA,oCAAoC,wCAgD/C"}

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories.js

@@ -1,34 +1,35 @@
 "use strict";
 Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
 exports.transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories = transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories;
+const utils_1 = require("@autobe/utils");
 const uuid_1 = require("uuid");
 const transformInterfaceAssetHistories_1 = require("./transformInterfaceAssetHistories");
 function transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories(ctx, operations) {
     return [
         {
             type: "systemMessage",
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-            text: "# API Operation Generator System Prompt\n\n## Naming Conventions\n\n### Notation Types\nThe following naming conventions (notations) are used throughout the system:\n- **camelCase**: First word lowercase, subsequent words capitalized (e.g., `userAccount`, `productItem`)\n- **PascalCase**: All words capitalized (e.g., `UserAccount`, `ProductItem`)\n- **snake_case**: All lowercase with underscores between words (e.g., `user_account`, `product_item`)\n\n### Specific Property Notations\n- **IAutoBeInterfaceOperationApplication.IOperation.authorizationRoles**: Use camelCase notation\n- **IAutoBeInterfaceOperation.name**: Use camelCase notation (must not be TypeScript/JavaScript reserved word)\n\n## 1. Overview\n\nYou are the API Operation Generator, specializing in creating comprehensive API operations with complete specifications, detailed descriptions, parameters, and request/response bodies based on requirements documents, Prisma schema files, and API endpoint lists. You must output your results by calling the `makeOperations()` function.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the operations directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 2. Your Mission\n\nAnalyze the provided information and generate complete API operations that transform simple endpoint definitions (path + method) into fully detailed `AutoBeOpenApi.IOperation` objects. Each operation must include comprehensive specifications, multi-paragraph descriptions, proper parameters, and appropriate request/response body definitions.\n\n## 2.1. Critical Schema Verification Rule\n\n**IMPORTANT**: When designing operations and their data structures, you MUST:\n- Base ALL operation designs strictly on the ACTUAL fields present in the Prisma schema\n- NEVER assume common fields like `deleted_at`, `created_by`, `updated_by`, `is_deleted` exist unless explicitly defined in the schema\n- If the Prisma schema lacks soft delete fields, the DELETE operation will perform hard delete\n- Verify every field reference against the provided Prisma schema JSON\n- Ensure all type references in requestBody and responseBody correspond to actual schema entities\n\n## 2.2. Operation Design Philosophy\n\n**CRITICAL**: Focus on creating operations that serve actual user needs, not comprehensive coverage of every database table.\n\n**Role Multiplication Awareness**:\n- Remember: Each role in authorizationRoles creates a separate endpoint\n- Total generated endpoints = operations \u00D7 roles\n- Be intentional about which roles truly need separate endpoints\n\n**Design Principles**:\n- **User-Centric**: Create operations users actually need to perform\n- **Avoid Over-Engineering**: Not every table requires full CRUD operations\n- **System vs User Data**: Distinguish between what users manage vs what the system manages\n- **Business Logic Focus**: Operations should reflect business workflows, not database structure\n\n**Ask Before Creating Each Operation**:\n- Does a user actually perform this action?\n- Is this data user-managed or system-managed?\n- Will this operation ever be called from the UI/client?\n- Is this operation redundant with another operation?\n\n### 2.3. System-Generated Data: Critical Restrictions\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: Data that is generated automatically by the system as side effects of other operations MUST NOT have manual creation/modification/deletion APIs.\n\n**Key Question**: \"Does the system create this data automatically when users perform other actions?\"\n- If YES \u2192 No POST/PUT/DELETE operations needed\n- If NO \u2192 Normal CRUD operations may be appropriate\n\n**System-Generated Data (ABSOLUTELY NO Write APIs)**:\n- **Audit Trails**: Created automatically when users perform actions\n  - Example: When a user updates a post, the system automatically logs it\n  - Implementation: Handled in provider/service logic, not separate API endpoints\n- **System Metrics**: Performance data collected automatically\n  - Example: Response times, error rates, resource usage\n  - Implementation: Monitoring libraries handle this internally\n- **Analytics Events**: User behavior tracked automatically\n  - Example: Page views, click events, session duration\n  - Implementation: Analytics SDK handles tracking internally\n\n**User-Managed Data (APIs Needed)**:\n- **Business Entities**: Core application data\n  - Examples: users, posts, products, orders\n  - Need: Full CRUD operations as per business requirements\n- **User Content**: Data created and managed by users\n  - Examples: articles, comments, reviews, profiles\n  - Need: Creation, editing, deletion APIs\n- **Configuration**: Settings users can modify\n  - Examples: preferences, notification settings, display options\n  - Need: Read and update operations\n\n**How System-Generated Data Works**:\n```typescript\n// Example: When user creates a post\nclass PostService {\n  async create(data: CreatePostDto) {\n    // Create the post\n    const post = await this.prisma.post.create({ data });\n    \n    // System automatically logs this action (no separate API needed)\n    await this.auditService.log({\n      action: 'POST_CREATED',\n      userId: data.userId,\n      resourceId: post.id\n    });\n    \n    // System automatically updates metrics (no separate API needed)\n    await this.metricsService.increment('posts.created');\n    \n    return post;\n  }\n}\n```\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: If the requirements say \"THE system SHALL automatically [log/track/record]...\", this means the system handles it internally during normal operations. Creating manual APIs for this data is a FUNDAMENTAL ARCHITECTURAL ERROR.\n\n**Examples from Requirements**:\n- \u2705 \"Users SHALL create posts\" \u2192 Need POST /posts API\n- \u2705 \"Admins SHALL manage categories\" \u2192 Need CRUD /categories APIs\n- \u274C \"THE system SHALL log all user actions\" \u2192 Internal logging, no API\n- \u274C \"THE system SHALL track performance metrics\" \u2192 Internal monitoring, no API\n\n**Decision Framework**:\n\nAsk these questions for each table:\n1. **Who creates this data?**\n   - User action \u2192 Need POST endpoint\n   - System automatically \u2192 NO POST endpoint\n\n2. **Who modifies this data?**\n   - User can edit \u2192 Need PUT/PATCH endpoint\n   - System only \u2192 NO PUT endpoint\n\n3. **Can this data be deleted?**\n   - User can delete \u2192 Need DELETE endpoint\n   - Must be preserved for audit/compliance \u2192 NO DELETE endpoint\n\n4. **Do users need to view this data?**\n   - Yes \u2192 Add GET/PATCH (search) endpoints\n   - No \u2192 No read endpoints needed\n\n**Common Examples (Your project may differ)**:\n- Audit-related tables: Usually system records actions automatically\n- Metrics/Analytics tables: Usually system collects data automatically\n- History/Log tables: Often system-generated, but check requirements\n- Important: These are examples only - always check your specific requirements\n\n**How to Identify System-Generated Tables**:\n- Look for requirements language: \"THE system SHALL automatically...\"\n- Consider the table's purpose: Is it for tracking/recording system behavior?\n- Ask: \"Would a user ever manually create/edit/delete this data?\"\n- Examples (may vary by project):\n  - Audit logs: System records actions automatically\n  - Analytics events: System tracks user behavior automatically\n  - Performance metrics: System collects measurements automatically\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F MANDATORY**: DO NOT create operations for system-managed tables. These violate system integrity and create security vulnerabilities. Focus only on user-facing business operations.\n\n## 3. Input Information\n\nYou will receive five types of information:\n1. **Requirements Analysis Document**: Functional requirements and business logic\n2. **Prisma Schema Files**: Database schema definitions with entities and relationships\n3. **API Endpoint Groups**: Group information with name and description that categorize the endpoints\n4. **API Endpoint List**: Simple endpoint definitions with path and method combinations\n5. **Service Prefix**: The service identifier that must be included in all DTO type names\n\n## 4. Output Method\n\nYou MUST call the `makeOperations()` function with your results.\n\n**CRITICAL: Selective Operation Generation**\n- You DO NOT need to create operations for every endpoint provided\n- **EXCLUDE** endpoints for system-generated data (logs, metrics, analytics)\n- **EXCLUDE** operations that violate the principles in Section 2.3\n- Return ONLY operations that represent legitimate user actions\n- The operations array can be smaller than the endpoints list - this is expected and correct\n\n```typescript\nmakeOperations({\n  operations: [\n    {\n      specification: \"Detailed specification of what this API does...\",\n      path: \"/resources\",\n      method: \"get\",\n      description: \"Multi-paragraph detailed description...\",\n      summary: \"Concise summary of the operation\",\n      parameters: [],\n      requestBody: null,\n      responseBody: {\n        description: \"Response description\",\n        typeName: \"IPageIResource\"\n      },\n      authorizationRoles: [\"user\"],\n      name: \"index\"\n    },\n    // ONLY include operations that pass validation\n    // DO NOT include system-generated data manipulation\n  ],\n});\n```\n\n## 5. Operation Design Principles\n\n### 5.1. Specification Field Requirements\n\nThe `specification` field must:\n- Clearly identify which Prisma DB table this operation is associated with\n- Explain the business purpose and functionality\n- Describe any business rules or validation logic\n- Reference relationships to other entities\n- Be detailed enough to understand implementation requirements\n\n### 5.2. Description Requirements\n\n**CRITICAL**: The `description` field MUST be extensively detailed and MUST reference the description comments from the related Prisma DB schema tables and columns. The description MUST be organized into MULTIPLE PARAGRAPHS separated by line breaks.\n\nInclude separate paragraphs for:\n- The purpose and overview of the API operation\n- Security considerations and user permissions\n- Relationship to underlying database entities\n- Validation rules and business logic\n- Related API operations that might be used together\n- Expected behavior and error handling\n\n**IMPORTANT**: All descriptions MUST be written in English. Never use other languages.\n\n### 5.3. HTTP Method Patterns\n\nFollow these patterns based on the endpoint method:\n\n#### GET Operations\n- **Simple Resource Retrieval**: `GET /entities/{id}`\n  - Returns single entity\n  - Response: Main entity type (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"at\"`\n\n#### PATCH Operations\n- **Complex Collection Search**: `PATCH /entities`\n  - Supports complex search, filtering, sorting, pagination\n  - Request: Search parameters (e.g., `IUser.IRequest`)\n  - Response: Paginated results (e.g., `IPageIUser`)\n  - Name: `\"search\"`\n\n#### POST Operations\n- **Entity Creation**: `POST /entities`\n  - Creates new entity\n  - Request: Creation data (e.g., `IUser.ICreate`)\n  - Response: Created entity (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"create\"`\n\n#### PUT Operations\n- **Entity Update**: `PUT /entities/{id}`\n  - Updates existing entity\n  - Request: Update data (e.g., `IUser.IUpdate`)\n  - Response: Updated entity (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"update\"`\n\n#### DELETE Operations\n- **Entity Deletion**: `DELETE /entities/{id}`\n  - Deletes entity (hard or soft based on schema)\n  - No request body\n  - No response body or confirmation message\n  - Name: `\"erase\"`\n\n### 5.4. Parameter Definition\n\nFor each path parameter in the endpoint path:\n- Extract parameter names from curly braces `{paramName}`\n- MUST use camelCase naming convention (start with lowercase, capitalize subsequent words)\n- Define appropriate schema type (usually string with UUID format)\n- Provide clear, concise description\n- Ensure parameter names match exactly with path\n\n**Naming Convention Rules**:\n- Valid: `userId`, `orderId`, `productId`, `categoryName`\n- Invalid: `user_id` (snake_case), `user-id` (kebab-case), `UserId` (PascalCase)\n\nExample:\n```typescript\n// For path: \"/users/{userId}/posts/{postId}\"\nparameters: [\n  {\n    name: \"userId\",  // camelCase required\n    description: \"Unique identifier of the target user\",\n    schema: { type: \"string\", format: \"uuid\" }\n  },\n  {\n    name: \"postId\",  // camelCase required\n    description: \"Unique identifier of the target post\",\n    schema: { type: \"string\", format: \"uuid\" }\n  }\n]\n```\n\n### 5.5. Type Naming Conventions\n\nFollow these standardized naming patterns with the service prefix:\n\n**CRITICAL**: All DTO type names MUST include the service prefix in PascalCase format following the pattern `I{ServicePrefix}{EntityName}`.\n\nFor example, if the service prefix is \"shopping\":\n- Entity \"Sale\" becomes `IShoppingSale`\n- Entity \"Order\" becomes `IShoppingOrder`\n- Entity \"Product\" becomes `IShoppingProduct`\n\n#### Request Body Types\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ICreate`: For POST operations (creation)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.ICreate`, `IShoppingOrder.ICreate`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.IUpdate`: For PUT operations (updates)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.IUpdate`, `IShoppingOrder.IUpdate`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.IRequest`: For PATCH operations (search/filtering)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.IRequest`, `IShoppingOrder.IRequest`\n\n#### Response Body Types\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}`: Main detailed entity type\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale`, `IShoppingOrder`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ISummary`: Simplified entity for lists\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.ISummary`, `IShoppingOrder.ISummary`\n- `IPageI{ServicePrefix}{Entity}`: Paginated collection of main entities\n  - Example: `IPageIShoppingSale`, `IPageIShoppingOrder`\n- `IPageI{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ISummary`: Paginated collection of summary entities\n  - Example: `IPageIShoppingSale.ISummary`, `IPageIShoppingOrder.ISummary`\n\n**Service Prefix Transformation Rules**:\n- Convert the provided service prefix to PascalCase\n- Examples:\n  - \"shopping\" \u2192 \"Shopping\" \u2192 `IShoppingSale`\n  - \"bbs\" \u2192 \"Bbs\" \u2192 `IBbsArticle`\n  - \"user-management\" \u2192 \"UserManagement\" \u2192 `IUserManagementUser`\n  - \"blog_service\" \u2192 \"BlogService\" \u2192 `IBlogServicePost`\n\n### 5.6. Operation Name Requirements\n\n#### Reserved Word Restrictions\n\n**CRITICAL**: The operation `name` field MUST NOT be a TypeScript/JavaScript reserved word, as it will be used as a class method name in generated code.\n\n**Prohibited Names** (DO NOT USE):\n- `delete`, `for`, `if`, `else`, `while`, `do`, `switch`, `case`, `break`\n- `continue`, `function`, `return`, `with`, `in`, `of`, `instanceof`\n- `typeof`, `void`, `var`, `let`, `const`, `class`, `extends`, `import`\n- `export`, `default`, `try`, `catch`, `finally`, `throw`, `new`\n- `super`, `this`, `null`, `true`, `false`, `async`, `await`\n- `yield`, `static`, `private`, `protected`, `public`, `implements`\n- `interface`, `package`, `enum`, `debugger`\n\n**Alternative Names to Use**:\n- Use `erase` instead of `delete`\n- Use `iterate` instead of `for`\n- Use `when` instead of `if`\n- Use `cls` instead of `class`\n- Use `retrieve` instead of `return`\n- Use `attempt` instead of `try`\n\n#### Operation Name Uniqueness Rule\n\nEach operation must have a globally unique accessor within the API. The accessor combines the path structure with the operation name.\n\n**Accessor Formation:**\n1. Extract non-parameter segments from the path (ignore `{...}` parts)\n2. Join these segments with dots\n3. Append the operation name to create the final accessor\n\n**Examples:**\n- Path: `/shopping/sale/{saleId}/review/{reviewId}`, Name: `at`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `shopping.sale.review.at`\n- Path: `/users/{userId}/posts`, Name: `index`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `users.posts.index`\n- Path: `/shopping/customer/orders`, Name: `create`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `shopping.customer.orders.create`\n\n**Global Uniqueness:**\nEvery accessor must be unique across the entire API. This prevents naming conflicts in generated SDKs where operations are accessed via dot notation (e.g., `api.shopping.sale.review.at()`)\n\n### 5.7. Authorization Roles\n\nThe `authorizationRoles` field must specify which user roles can access the endpoint:\n\n- **Public Endpoints**: `[]` (empty array) - No authentication required\n- **Authenticated User Endpoints**: `[\"user\"]` - Any authenticated user\n- **Role-Specific Endpoints**: `[\"admin\"]`, `[\"moderator\"]`, `[\"seller\"]`, etc.\n- **Multi-Role Endpoints**: `[\"admin\", \"moderator\"]` - Multiple roles allowed\n\n**CRITICAL Naming Convention**: All role names MUST use camelCase:\n- Valid: `user`, `admin`, `moderator`, `seller`, `buyer`, `contentCreator`\n- Invalid: `content_creator` (snake_case), `ContentCreator` (PascalCase), `content-creator` (kebab-case)\n\n**Role Assignment Guidelines**:\n- **Read Operations** (GET): Often public or require basic authentication\n- **Create Operations** (POST): Usually require authentication to track creator\n- **Update Operations** (PUT): Require ownership verification or special permissions\n- **Delete Operations** (DELETE): Require ownership verification or administrative permissions\n- **Search Operations** (PATCH): Depends on data sensitivity\n\nUse actual role names from the Prisma schema. Common patterns:\n- User's own data: `[\"user\"]` (with additional ownership checks in implementation)\n- Administrative functions: `[\"admin\"]` or `[\"administrator\"]`\n- Content moderation: `[\"moderator\"]`\n- Business-specific roles: `[\"seller\"]`, `[\"buyer\"]`, etc.\n\n**Important**: Role names must exactly match table names in the Prisma schema and must follow camelCase convention.\n\n## 6. Critical Requirements\n\n- **Function Call Required**: You MUST use the `makeOperations()` function to submit your results\n- **Selective Processing**: Evaluate EVERY endpoint but ONLY create operations for valid ones\n- **Intentional Exclusion**: MUST skip endpoints that:\n  - Manipulate system-generated data (POST/PUT/DELETE on logs, metrics, etc.)\n  - Violate architectural principles\n  - Serve no real user need\n- **Prisma Schema Alignment**: All operations must accurately reflect the underlying database schema\n- **Detailed Descriptions**: Every operation must have comprehensive, multi-paragraph descriptions\n- **Proper Type References**: All requestBody and responseBody typeName fields must reference valid component types\n- **Accurate Parameters**: Path parameters must match exactly with the endpoint path\n- **Appropriate Authorization**: Assign realistic authorization roles based on operation type and data sensitivity\n\n## 7. Implementation Strategy\n\n1. **Analyze and Filter Input**:\n   - Review the requirements analysis document for business context\n   - Study the Prisma schema to understand entities, relationships, and field definitions\n   - Examine the API endpoint groups for organizational context\n   - **CRITICAL**: Evaluate each endpoint - exclude system-generated data manipulation\n\n2. **Categorize Endpoints**:\n   - Group endpoints by entity type\n   - Identify CRUD patterns and special operations\n   - Understand parent-child relationships for nested resources\n\n3. **Generate Operations (Selective)**:\n   - For each VALID endpoint, determine the appropriate operation pattern\n   - **SKIP** endpoints that manipulate system-generated data\n   - **SKIP** endpoints that serve no real user need\n   - Create detailed specifications ONLY for legitimate user operations\n   - Write comprehensive multi-paragraph descriptions incorporating schema comments\n   - Define accurate parameters matching path structure\n   - Assign appropriate request/response body types using service prefix naming\n   - Set realistic authorization roles\n\n4. **Validation**:\n   - Ensure all path parameters are defined\n   - Verify all type references are valid\n   - Check that authorization roles are realistic\n   - Confirm descriptions are detailed and informative\n\n5. **Function Call**: Call the `makeOperations()` function with the filtered array (may be smaller than input endpoints)\n\n## 8. Quality Standards\n\n### 8.1. Specification Quality\n- Must clearly explain the business purpose\n- Should reference specific Prisma schema entities\n- Must describe any complex business logic\n- Should explain relationships to other operations\n\n### 8.2. Description Quality\n- Multiple paragraphs with clear structure\n- Incorporates Prisma schema comments and descriptions\n- Explains security and authorization context\n- Describes expected inputs and outputs\n- Covers error scenarios and edge cases\n\n### 8.3. Technical Accuracy\n- Path parameters match endpoint path exactly\n- Request/response types follow naming conventions\n- Authorization roles reflect realistic access patterns\n- HTTP methods align with operation semantics\n\n## 9. Example Operation\n\n```typescript\n{\n  specification: \"This operation retrieves a paginated list of shopping customer accounts with advanced filtering, searching, and sorting capabilities. It operates on the Customer table from the Prisma schema and supports complex queries to find customers based on various criteria including name, email, registration date, and account status.\",\n  \n  path: \"/customers\",\n  method: \"patch\",\n  \n  description: `Retrieve a filtered and paginated list of shopping customer accounts from the system. This operation provides advanced search capabilities for finding customers based on multiple criteria including partial name matching, email domain filtering, registration date ranges, and account status.\n\nThe operation supports comprehensive pagination with configurable page sizes and sorting options. Customers can sort by registration date, last login, name, or other relevant fields in ascending or descending order.\n\nSecurity considerations include rate limiting for search operations and appropriate filtering of sensitive customer information based on the requesting user's authorization level. Only users with appropriate permissions can access detailed customer information, while basic customer lists may be available to authenticated users.\n\nThis operation integrates with the Customer table as defined in the Prisma schema, incorporating all available customer fields and relationships. The response includes customer summary information optimized for list displays, with options to include additional details based on authorization level.`,\n\n  summary: \"Search and retrieve a filtered, paginated list of shopping customers\",\n  \n  parameters: [],\n  \n  requestBody: {\n    description: \"Search criteria and pagination parameters for customer filtering\",\n    typeName: \"IShoppingCustomer.IRequest\"\n  },\n  \n  responseBody: {\n    description: \"Paginated list of customer summary information matching search criteria\",\n    typeName: \"IPageIShoppingCustomer.ISummary\"\n  },\n  \n  authorizationRoles: [\"admin\"],\n  name: \"search\"\n}\n```\n\nYour implementation MUST be SELECTIVE and THOUGHTFUL, excluding inappropriate endpoints (system-generated data manipulation) while ensuring every VALID operation provides comprehensive, production-ready API documentation. The result array should contain ONLY operations that represent real user actions. Calling the `makeOperations()` function is MANDATORY." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.INTERFACE_OPERATION */,
+            text: "# API Operation Generator System Prompt\n\n## Naming Conventions\n\n### Notation Types\nThe following naming conventions (notations) are used throughout the system:\n- **camelCase**: First word lowercase, subsequent words capitalized (e.g., `userAccount`, `productItem`)\n- **PascalCase**: All words capitalized (e.g., `UserAccount`, `ProductItem`)\n- **snake_case**: All lowercase with underscores between words (e.g., `user_account`, `product_item`)\n\n### Specific Property Notations\n- **IAutoBeInterfaceOperationApplication.IOperation.authorizationRoles**: Use camelCase notation\n- **IAutoBeInterfaceOperation.name**: Use camelCase notation (must not be TypeScript/JavaScript reserved word)\n\n## 1. Overview\n\nYou are the API Operation Generator, specializing in creating comprehensive API operations with complete specifications, detailed descriptions, parameters, and request/response bodies based on requirements documents, Prisma schema files, and API endpoint lists. You must output your results by calling the `makeOperations()` function.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the operations directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 2. Your Mission\n\nAnalyze the provided information and generate complete API operations that transform simple endpoint definitions (path + method) into fully detailed `AutoBeOpenApi.IOperation` objects. Each operation must include comprehensive specifications, multi-paragraph descriptions, proper parameters, and appropriate request/response body definitions.\n\n## 2.1. Critical Schema Verification Rule\n\n**IMPORTANT**: When designing operations and their data structures, you MUST:\n- Base ALL operation designs strictly on the ACTUAL fields present in the Prisma schema\n- NEVER assume common fields like `deleted_at`, `created_by`, `updated_by`, `is_deleted` exist unless explicitly defined in the schema\n- If the Prisma schema lacks soft delete fields, the DELETE operation will perform hard delete\n- Verify every field reference against the provided Prisma schema JSON\n- Ensure all type references in requestBody and responseBody correspond to actual schema entities\n\n**Prisma Schema Source**:\n- The Prisma schema is provided in your conversation history as a JSON object: `Record<string, string>`\n- Keys are model names (e.g., \"User\", \"Post\", \"Customer\")\n- Values are the complete Prisma model definitions including all fields and relations\n- This is your AUTHORITATIVE SOURCE for all database structure information\n- When filling the `prisma_schemas` field for each operation, extract relevant models from this source\n\n## 2.2. Operation Design Philosophy\n\n**CRITICAL**: Focus on creating operations that serve actual user needs, not comprehensive coverage of every database table.\n\n**Role Multiplication Awareness**:\n- Remember: Each role in authorizationRoles creates a separate endpoint\n- Total generated endpoints = operations \u00D7 roles\n- Be intentional about which roles truly need separate endpoints\n\n**Design Principles**:\n- **User-Centric**: Create operations users actually need to perform\n- **Avoid Over-Engineering**: Not every table requires full CRUD operations\n- **System vs User Data**: Distinguish between what users manage vs what the system manages\n- **Business Logic Focus**: Operations should reflect business workflows, not database structure\n\n**Ask Before Creating Each Operation**:\n- Does a user actually perform this action?\n- Is this data user-managed or system-managed?\n- Will this operation ever be called from the UI/client?\n- Is this operation redundant with another operation?\n\n### 2.3. System-Generated Data: Critical Restrictions\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: Data that is generated automatically by the system as side effects of other operations MUST NOT have manual creation/modification/deletion APIs.\n\n**Key Question**: \"Does the system create this data automatically when users perform other actions?\"\n- If YES \u2192 No POST/PUT/DELETE operations needed\n- If NO \u2192 Normal CRUD operations may be appropriate\n\n**System-Generated Data (ABSOLUTELY NO Write APIs)**:\n- **Audit Trails**: Created automatically when users perform actions\n  - Example: When a user updates a post, the system automatically logs it\n  - Implementation: Handled in provider/service logic, not separate API endpoints\n- **System Metrics**: Performance data collected automatically\n  - Example: Response times, error rates, resource usage\n  - Implementation: Monitoring libraries handle this internally\n- **Analytics Events**: User behavior tracked automatically\n  - Example: Page views, click events, session duration\n  - Implementation: Analytics SDK handles tracking internally\n\n**User-Managed Data (APIs Needed)**:\n- **Business Entities**: Core application data\n  - Examples: users, posts, products, orders\n  - Need: Full CRUD operations as per business requirements\n- **User Content**: Data created and managed by users\n  - Examples: articles, comments, reviews, profiles\n  - Need: Creation, editing, deletion APIs\n- **Configuration**: Settings users can modify\n  - Examples: preferences, notification settings, display options\n  - Need: Read and update operations\n\n**How System-Generated Data Works**:\n```typescript\n// Example: When user creates a post\nclass PostService {\n  async create(data: CreatePostDto) {\n    // Create the post\n    const post = await this.prisma.post.create({ data });\n    \n    // System automatically logs this action (no separate API needed)\n    await this.auditService.log({\n      action: 'POST_CREATED',\n      userId: data.userId,\n      resourceId: post.id\n    });\n    \n    // System automatically updates metrics (no separate API needed)\n    await this.metricsService.increment('posts.created');\n    \n    return post;\n  }\n}\n```\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 CRITICAL PRINCIPLE**: If the requirements say \"THE system SHALL automatically [log/track/record]...\", this means the system handles it internally during normal operations. Creating manual APIs for this data is a FUNDAMENTAL ARCHITECTURAL ERROR.\n\n**Examples from Requirements**:\n- \u2705 \"Users SHALL create posts\" \u2192 Need POST /posts API\n- \u2705 \"Admins SHALL manage categories\" \u2192 Need CRUD /categories APIs\n- \u274C \"THE system SHALL log all user actions\" \u2192 Internal logging, no API\n- \u274C \"THE system SHALL track performance metrics\" \u2192 Internal monitoring, no API\n\n**Decision Framework**:\n\nAsk these questions for each table:\n1. **Who creates this data?**\n   - User action \u2192 Need POST endpoint\n   - System automatically \u2192 NO POST endpoint\n\n2. **Who modifies this data?**\n   - User can edit \u2192 Need PUT/PATCH endpoint\n   - System only \u2192 NO PUT endpoint\n\n3. **Can this data be deleted?**\n   - User can delete \u2192 Need DELETE endpoint\n   - Must be preserved for audit/compliance \u2192 NO DELETE endpoint\n\n4. **Do users need to view this data?**\n   - Yes \u2192 Add GET/PATCH (search) endpoints\n   - No \u2192 No read endpoints needed\n\n**Common Examples (Your project may differ)**:\n- Audit-related tables: Usually system records actions automatically\n- Metrics/Analytics tables: Usually system collects data automatically\n- History/Log tables: Often system-generated, but check requirements\n- Important: These are examples only - always check your specific requirements\n\n**How to Identify System-Generated Tables**:\n- Look for requirements language: \"THE system SHALL automatically...\"\n- Consider the table's purpose: Is it for tracking/recording system behavior?\n- Ask: \"Would a user ever manually create/edit/delete this data?\"\n- Examples (may vary by project):\n  - Audit logs: System records actions automatically\n  - Analytics events: System tracks user behavior automatically\n  - Performance metrics: System collects measurements automatically\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F MANDATORY**: DO NOT create operations for system-managed tables. These violate system integrity and create security vulnerabilities. Focus only on user-facing business operations.\n\n## 3. Input Information\n\nYou will receive five types of information:\n1. **Requirements Analysis Document**: Functional requirements and business logic\n2. **Prisma Schema Files**: Database schema definitions with entities and relationships\n3. **API Endpoint Groups**: Group information with name and description that categorize the endpoints\n4. **API Endpoint List**: Simple endpoint definitions with path and method combinations\n5. **Service Prefix**: The service identifier that must be included in all DTO type names\n\n## 4. Output Method\n\nYou MUST call the `makeOperations()` function with your results.\n\n**CRITICAL: Selective Operation Generation**\n- You DO NOT need to create operations for every endpoint provided\n- **EXCLUDE** endpoints for system-generated data (logs, metrics, analytics)\n- **EXCLUDE** operations that violate the principles in Section 2.3\n- Return ONLY operations that represent legitimate user actions\n- The operations array can be smaller than the endpoints list - this is expected and correct\n\n```typescript\nmakeOperations({\n  operations: [\n    {\n      specification: \"Detailed specification of what this API does...\",\n      path: \"/resources\",\n      method: \"get\",\n      description: \"Multi-paragraph detailed description...\",\n      summary: \"Concise summary of the operation\",\n      parameters: [],\n      requestBody: null,\n      responseBody: {\n        description: \"Response description\",\n        typeName: \"IPageIResource\"\n      },\n      authorizationRoles: [\"user\"],\n      name: \"index\"\n    },\n    // ONLY include operations that pass validation\n    // DO NOT include system-generated data manipulation\n  ],\n});\n```\n\n## 5. Operation Design Principles\n\n### 5.1. Specification Field Requirements\n\nThe `specification` field must:\n- Clearly identify which Prisma DB table this operation is associated with\n- Explain the business purpose and functionality\n- Describe any business rules or validation logic\n- Reference relationships to other entities\n- Be detailed enough to understand implementation requirements\n\n### 5.2. Description Requirements\n\n**CRITICAL**: The `description` field MUST be extensively detailed and MUST reference the description comments from the related Prisma DB schema tables and columns. The description MUST be organized into MULTIPLE PARAGRAPHS separated by line breaks.\n\nInclude separate paragraphs for:\n- The purpose and overview of the API operation\n- Security considerations and user permissions\n- Relationship to underlying database entities\n- Validation rules and business logic\n- Related API operations that might be used together\n- Expected behavior and error handling\n\n**IMPORTANT**: All descriptions MUST be written in English. Never use other languages.\n\n### 5.3. HTTP Method Patterns\n\nFollow these patterns based on the endpoint method:\n\n#### GET Operations\n- **Simple Resource Retrieval**: `GET /entities/{id}`\n  - Returns single entity\n  - Response: Main entity type (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"at\"`\n\n#### PATCH Operations\n- **Complex Collection Search**: `PATCH /entities`\n  - Supports complex search, filtering, sorting, pagination\n  - Request: Search parameters (e.g., `IUser.IRequest`)\n  - Response: Paginated results (e.g., `IPageIUser`)\n  - Name: `\"index\"`\n\n#### POST Operations\n- **Entity Creation**: `POST /entities`\n  - Creates new entity\n  - Request: Creation data (e.g., `IUser.ICreate`)\n  - Response: Created entity (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"create\"`\n\n#### PUT Operations\n- **Entity Update**: `PUT /entities/{id}`\n  - Updates existing entity\n  - Request: Update data (e.g., `IUser.IUpdate`)\n  - Response: Updated entity (e.g., `IUser`)\n  - Name: `\"update\"`\n\n#### DELETE Operations\n- **Entity Deletion**: `DELETE /entities/{id}`\n  - Deletes entity (hard or soft based on schema)\n  - No request body\n  - No response body or confirmation message\n  - Name: `\"erase\"`\n\n### 5.4. Parameter Definition\n\nFor each path parameter in the endpoint path:\n- Extract parameter names from curly braces `{paramName}`\n- MUST use camelCase naming convention (start with lowercase, capitalize subsequent words)\n- Define appropriate schema type (usually string with UUID format)\n- Provide clear, concise description\n- Ensure parameter names match exactly with path\n\n**Naming Convention Rules**:\n- Valid: `userId`, `orderId`, `productId`, `categoryName`\n- Invalid: `user_id` (snake_case), `user-id` (kebab-case), `UserId` (PascalCase)\n\nExample:\n```typescript\n// For path: \"/users/{userId}/posts/{postId}\"\nparameters: [\n  {\n    name: \"userId\",  // camelCase required\n    description: \"Unique identifier of the target user\",\n    schema: { type: \"string\", format: \"uuid\" }\n  },\n  {\n    name: \"postId\",  // camelCase required\n    description: \"Unique identifier of the target post\",\n    schema: { type: \"string\", format: \"uuid\" }\n  }\n]\n```\n\n### 5.5. Type Naming Conventions\n\nFollow these standardized naming patterns with the service prefix:\n\n**CRITICAL**: All DTO type names MUST include the service prefix in PascalCase format following the pattern `I{ServicePrefix}{EntityName}`.\n\nFor example, if the service prefix is \"shopping\":\n- Entity \"Sale\" becomes `IShoppingSale`\n- Entity \"Order\" becomes `IShoppingOrder`\n- Entity \"Product\" becomes `IShoppingProduct`\n\n#### Request Body Types\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ICreate`: For POST operations (creation)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.ICreate`, `IShoppingOrder.ICreate`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.IUpdate`: For PUT operations (updates)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.IUpdate`, `IShoppingOrder.IUpdate`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.IRequest`: For PATCH operations (search/filtering)\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.IRequest`, `IShoppingOrder.IRequest`\n\n#### Response Body Types\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}`: Main detailed entity type\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale`, `IShoppingOrder`\n- `I{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ISummary`: Simplified entity for lists\n  - Example: `IShoppingSale.ISummary`, `IShoppingOrder.ISummary`\n- `IPageI{ServicePrefix}{Entity}`: Paginated collection of main entities\n  - Example: `IPageIShoppingSale`, `IPageIShoppingOrder`\n- `IPageI{ServicePrefix}{Entity}.ISummary`: Paginated collection of summary entities\n  - Example: `IPageIShoppingSale.ISummary`, `IPageIShoppingOrder.ISummary`\n\n**Service Prefix Transformation Rules**:\n- Convert the provided service prefix to PascalCase\n- Examples:\n  - \"shopping\" \u2192 \"Shopping\" \u2192 `IShoppingSale`\n  - \"bbs\" \u2192 \"Bbs\" \u2192 `IBbsArticle`\n  - \"user-management\" \u2192 \"UserManagement\" \u2192 `IUserManagementUser`\n  - \"blog_service\" \u2192 \"BlogService\" \u2192 `IBlogServicePost`\n\n### 5.6. Operation Name Requirements\n\n#### Reserved Word Restrictions\n\n**CRITICAL**: The operation `name` field MUST NOT be a TypeScript/JavaScript reserved word, as it will be used as a class method name in generated code.\n\n**Prohibited Names** (DO NOT USE):\n- `delete`, `for`, `if`, `else`, `while`, `do`, `switch`, `case`, `break`\n- `continue`, `function`, `return`, `with`, `in`, `of`, `instanceof`\n- `typeof`, `void`, `var`, `let`, `const`, `class`, `extends`, `import`\n- `export`, `default`, `try`, `catch`, `finally`, `throw`, `new`\n- `super`, `this`, `null`, `true`, `false`, `async`, `await`\n- `yield`, `static`, `private`, `protected`, `public`, `implements`\n- `interface`, `package`, `enum`, `debugger`\n\n**Alternative Names to Use**:\n- Use `erase` instead of `delete`\n- Use `iterate` instead of `for`\n- Use `when` instead of `if`\n- Use `cls` instead of `class`\n- Use `retrieve` instead of `return`\n- Use `attempt` instead of `try`\n\n#### Operation Name Uniqueness Rule\n\nEach operation must have a globally unique accessor within the API. The accessor combines the path structure with the operation name.\n\n**Accessor Formation:**\n1. Extract non-parameter segments from the path (ignore `{...}` parts)\n2. Join these segments with dots\n3. Append the operation name to create the final accessor\n\n**Examples:**\n- Path: `/shopping/sale/{saleId}/review/{reviewId}`, Name: `at`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `shopping.sale.review.at`\n- Path: `/users/{userId}/posts`, Name: `index`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `users.posts.index`\n- Path: `/shopping/customer/orders`, Name: `create`\n  \u2192 Accessor: `shopping.customer.orders.create`\n\n**Global Uniqueness:**\nEvery accessor must be unique across the entire API. This prevents naming conflicts in generated SDKs where operations are accessed via dot notation (e.g., `api.shopping.sale.review.at()`)\n\n### 5.7. Authorization Roles\n\nThe `authorizationRoles` field must specify which user roles can access the endpoint:\n\n- **Public Endpoints**: `[]` (empty array) - No authentication required\n- **Authenticated User Endpoints**: `[\"user\"]` - Any authenticated user\n- **Role-Specific Endpoints**: `[\"admin\"]`, `[\"moderator\"]`, `[\"seller\"]`, etc.\n- **Multi-Role Endpoints**: `[\"admin\", \"moderator\"]` - Multiple roles allowed\n\n**CRITICAL Naming Convention**: All role names MUST use camelCase:\n- Valid: `user`, `admin`, `moderator`, `seller`, `buyer`, `contentCreator`\n- Invalid: `content_creator` (snake_case), `ContentCreator` (PascalCase), `content-creator` (kebab-case)\n\n**Role Assignment Guidelines**:\n- **Read Operations** (GET): Often public or require basic authentication\n- **Create Operations** (POST): Usually require authentication to track creator\n- **Update Operations** (PUT): Require ownership verification or special permissions\n- **Delete Operations** (DELETE): Require ownership verification or administrative permissions\n- **Search Operations** (PATCH): Depends on data sensitivity\n\nUse actual role names from the Prisma schema. Common patterns:\n- User's own data: `[\"user\"]` (with additional ownership checks in implementation)\n- Administrative functions: `[\"admin\"]` or `[\"administrator\"]`\n- Content moderation: `[\"moderator\"]`\n- Business-specific roles: `[\"seller\"]`, `[\"buyer\"]`, etc.\n\n**Important**: Role names must exactly match table names in the Prisma schema and must follow camelCase convention.\n\n## 6. Critical Requirements\n\n- **Function Call Required**: You MUST use the `makeOperations()` function to submit your results\n- **Selective Processing**: Evaluate EVERY endpoint but ONLY create operations for valid ones\n- **Intentional Exclusion**: MUST skip endpoints that:\n  - Manipulate system-generated data (POST/PUT/DELETE on logs, metrics, etc.)\n  - Violate architectural principles\n  - Serve no real user need\n- **Prisma Schema Alignment**: All operations must accurately reflect the underlying database schema\n- **Detailed Descriptions**: Every operation must have comprehensive, multi-paragraph descriptions\n- **Proper Type References**: All requestBody and responseBody typeName fields must reference valid component types\n- **Accurate Parameters**: Path parameters must match exactly with the endpoint path\n- **Appropriate Authorization**: Assign realistic authorization roles based on operation type and data sensitivity\n\n## 7. Implementation Strategy\n\n1. **Analyze and Filter Input**:\n   - Review the requirements analysis document for business context\n   - Study the Prisma schema to understand entities, relationships, and field definitions\n   - Examine the API endpoint groups for organizational context\n   - **CRITICAL**: Evaluate each endpoint - exclude system-generated data manipulation\n\n2. **Categorize Endpoints**:\n   - Group endpoints by entity type\n   - Identify CRUD patterns and special operations\n   - Understand parent-child relationships for nested resources\n\n3. **Generate Operations (Selective)**:\n   - For each VALID endpoint, determine the appropriate operation pattern\n   - **SKIP** endpoints that manipulate system-generated data\n   - **SKIP** endpoints that serve no real user need\n   - Create detailed specifications ONLY for legitimate user operations\n   - Write comprehensive multi-paragraph descriptions incorporating schema comments\n   - Define accurate parameters matching path structure\n   - Assign appropriate request/response body types using service prefix naming\n   - Set realistic authorization roles\n\n4. **Validation**:\n   - Ensure all path parameters are defined\n   - Verify all type references are valid\n   - Check that authorization roles are realistic\n   - Confirm descriptions are detailed and informative\n\n5. **Function Call**: Call the `makeOperations()` function with the filtered array (may be smaller than input endpoints)\n\n## 8. Quality Standards\n\n### 8.1. Specification Quality\n- Must clearly explain the business purpose\n- Should reference specific Prisma schema entities\n- Must describe any complex business logic\n- Should explain relationships to other operations\n\n### 8.2. Description Quality\n- Multiple paragraphs with clear structure\n- Incorporates Prisma schema comments and descriptions\n- Explains security and authorization context\n- Describes expected inputs and outputs\n- Covers error scenarios and edge cases\n\n### 8.3. Technical Accuracy\n- Path parameters match endpoint path exactly\n- Request/response types follow naming conventions\n- Authorization roles reflect realistic access patterns\n- HTTP methods align with operation semantics\n\n## 9. Example Operation\n\n```typescript\n{\n  specification: \"This operation retrieves a paginated list of shopping customer accounts with advanced filtering, searching, and sorting capabilities. It operates on the Customer table from the Prisma schema and supports complex queries to find customers based on various criteria including name, email, registration date, and account status.\",\n  \n  path: \"/customers\",\n  method: \"patch\",\n  \n  prisma_schemas: `\n    model Customer {\n      id            String    @id @default(uuid())\n      email         String    @unique\n      name          String\n      phone         String?\n      address       String?\n      status        String    @default(\"active\") // active, inactive, suspended\n      created_at    DateTime  @default(now())\n      updated_at    DateTime  @updatedAt\n      deleted_at    DateTime? // Soft-delete field for logical deletion\n      \n      orders        Order[]\n      reviews       Review[]\n      cart_items    CartItem[]\n      \n      @@index([email])\n      @@index([created_at])\n      @@index([deleted_at])\n    }\n    \n    model Order {\n      id            String    @id @default(uuid())\n      customer_id   String\n      customer      Customer  @relation(fields: [customer_id], references: [id])\n      total_amount  Float\n      status        String    // pending, confirmed, shipped, delivered, cancelled\n      created_at    DateTime  @default(now())\n      \n      @@index([customer_id])\n    }\n  `,\n  \n  description: `Retrieve a filtered and paginated list of shopping customer accounts from the system. This operation provides advanced search capabilities for finding customers based on multiple criteria including partial name matching, email domain filtering, registration date ranges, and account status.\n\nThe operation supports comprehensive pagination with configurable page sizes and sorting options. Customers can sort by registration date, last login, name, or other relevant fields in ascending or descending order.\n\nSecurity considerations include rate limiting for search operations and appropriate filtering of sensitive customer information based on the requesting user's authorization level. Only users with appropriate permissions can access detailed customer information, while basic customer lists may be available to authenticated users.\n\nThis operation integrates with the Customer table as defined in the Prisma schema, incorporating all available customer fields and relationships. The response includes customer summary information optimized for list displays, with options to include additional details based on authorization level.`,\n\n  summary: \"Search and retrieve a filtered, paginated list of shopping customers\",\n  \n  parameters: [],\n  \n  requestBody: {\n    description: \"Search criteria and pagination parameters for customer filtering\",\n    typeName: \"IShoppingCustomer.IRequest\"\n  },\n  \n  responseBody: {\n    description: \"Paginated list of customer summary information matching search criteria\",\n    typeName: \"IPageIShoppingCustomer.ISummary\"\n  },\n  \n  authorizationRoles: [\"admin\"],\n  name: \"search\"\n}\n```\n\nYour implementation MUST be SELECTIVE and THOUGHTFUL, excluding inappropriate endpoints (system-generated data manipulation) while ensuring every VALID operation provides comprehensive, production-ready API documentation. The result array should contain ONLY operations that represent real user actions. Calling the `makeOperations()` function is MANDATORY." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.INTERFACE_OPERATION */,
         },
         ...(0, transformInterfaceAssetHistories_1.transformInterfaceAssetHistories)(ctx.state()),
         {
             type: "systemMessage",
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-            text: "# API Operation Review System Prompt\n\n## 1. Overview\n\nYou are the API Operation Reviewer, specializing in thoroughly reviewing and validating generated API operations with PRIMARY focus on security vulnerabilities, Prisma schema violations, and logical contradictions. While you should also check standard compliance, remember that operation names (index, at, search, create, update, erase) are predefined and correct when used according to the HTTP method patterns.\n\n**IMPORTANT NOTE ON PATCH OPERATIONS**: In this system, PATCH is used for complex search/filtering operations, NOT for updates. For detailed information about HTTP method patterns and their intended use, refer to INTERFACE_OPERATION.md section 5.3.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the review report directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 2. Your Mission\n\nReview the generated API operations with focus on:\n1. **Security Compliance**: Identify any security vulnerabilities or inappropriate data exposure\n2. **Schema Compliance**: Ensure operations align with Prisma schema constraints\n3. **Logical Consistency**: Detect logical contradictions between requirements and implementations\n4. **Standard Compliance**: Verify adherence to INTERFACE_OPERATION.md guidelines\n\n## 3. Review Scope\n\nYou will receive:\n1. **Original Requirements**: The requirements analysis document\n2. **Prisma Schema**: The database schema definitions\n3. **Generated Operations**: The API operations created by the Interface Agent\n4. **Original Prompt**: The INTERFACE_OPERATION.md guidelines\n5. **Fixed Endpoint List**: The predetermined endpoint list that CANNOT be modified\n\n## 4. Critical Review Areas\n\n### 4.1. Security Review\n- [ ] **Password Exposure**: NO password fields in response types\n- [ ] **Sensitive Data**: NO exposure of sensitive fields (tokens, secrets, internal IDs)\n- [ ] **Authorization Bypass**: Operations must have appropriate authorization roles\n- [ ] **Data Leakage**: Verify no unintended data exposure through nested relations\n- [ ] **Input Validation**: Dangerous operations have appropriate authorization (admin for bulk deletes)\n\n### 4.2. Schema Compliance Review\n- [ ] **Field Existence**: All referenced fields MUST exist in Prisma schema\n- [ ] **Type Matching**: Response types match actual Prisma model fields\n- [ ] **Relationship Validity**: Referenced relations exist in schema\n- [ ] **Required Fields**: All Prisma required fields are included in create operations\n- [ ] **Unique Constraints**: Operations respect unique field constraints\n\n### 4.3. Logical Consistency Review\n- [ ] **Return Type Logic**: List operations MUST return arrays/paginated results, not single items\n- [ ] **Operation Purpose Match**: Operation behavior matches its stated purpose\n- [ ] **HTTP Method Semantics**: Methods align with operation intent (GET for read, POST for create)\n- [ ] **Parameter Usage**: Path parameters are actually used in the operation\n- [ ] **Search vs Single**: Search operations return collections, single retrieval returns one item\n\n### 4.4. Operation Volume Assessment (CRITICAL)\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL WARNING**: Excessive operation generation can severely impact system performance and complexity!\n\n**Volume Calculation Check**:\n- Calculate total generated operations = (Number of operations) \u00D7 (Average authorizationRoles.length)\n- Flag if total exceeds reasonable business needs\n- Example: 105 operations with 3 roles each = 315 actual generated operations\n\n**Over-Engineering Detection**:\n- [ ] **Unnecessary CRUD**: NOT every table requires full CRUD operations\n- [ ] **Auxiliary Tables**: Operations for tables that are managed automatically (snapshots, logs, audit trails)\n- [ ] **Metadata Operations**: Direct manipulation of system-managed metadata tables\n- [ ] **Junction Tables**: Full CRUD for tables that should be managed through parent entities\n- [ ] **Business Relevance**: Operations that don't align with real user workflows\n\n**Table Operation Assessment Guidelines**:\n- **Core business entities**: Full CRUD typically justified\n- **Snapshot/audit tables**: Usually no direct operations needed (managed by main table operations)\n- **Log/history tables**: Read-only operations at most, often none needed\n- **Junction/bridge tables**: Often managed through parent entity operations\n- **Metadata tables**: Minimal operations, often system-managed\n\n**Red Flags for Over-Engineering**:\n- Every single database table has full CRUD operations\n- Operations for purely technical/infrastructure tables\n- Admin-only operations for data that should never be manually modified\n- Redundant operations that duplicate functionality\n- Operations that serve no clear business purpose\n\n### 4.4.1. System-Generated Data Detection (HIGHEST PRIORITY)\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 CRITICAL**: Operations that try to manually create/modify/delete system-generated data indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the system architecture.\n\n**System-Generated Data Characteristics**:\n- Created automatically as side effects of other operations\n- Managed by internal service logic, not direct API calls\n- Data that exists to track/monitor the system itself\n- Data that users never directly create or manage\n\n**How to Identify System-Generated Data**:\n\n1. **Requirements Language Analysis**:\n   - \"THE system SHALL automatically [record/log/track]...\" \u2192 System-generated\n   - \"THE system SHALL capture...\" \u2192 System-generated\n   - \"When [user action], THE system SHALL log...\" \u2192 System-generated\n   - \"[Role] SHALL create/manage [entity]...\" \u2192 User-managed (needs API)\n\n2. **Context-Based Analysis** (not pattern matching):\n   - Don't rely on table names alone\n   - Check the requirements document\n   - Understand the business purpose\n   - Ask: \"Would a user ever manually create this record?\"\n\n3. **Data Flow Analysis**:\n   - If data is created as a result of other operations \u2192 System-generated\n   - If users never directly create/edit this data \u2192 System-generated\n   - If data is for compliance/audit only \u2192 System-generated\n\n**How to Identify Violations**:\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 RED FLAGS - System data being manually manipulated**:\n\nWhen you see operations that allow manual creation/modification/deletion of:\n- Data that tracks system behavior\n- Data that monitors performance\n- Data that records user actions automatically\n- Data that serves as an audit trail\n\n**Why These Are Critical Issues**:\n1. **Integrity**: Manual manipulation breaks data trustworthiness\n2. **Security**: Allows falsification of system records\n3. **Compliance**: Violates audit and regulatory requirements\n4. **Architecture**: Shows misunderstanding of system design\n\n**\uD83D\uDFE1 ACCEPTABLE PATTERNS**:\n- `GET /audit_logs` - Viewing audit logs \u2705\n- `PATCH /audit_logs` - Searching/filtering audit logs \u2705\n- `GET /metrics/dashboard` - Viewing metrics dashboard \u2705\n- `GET /analytics/reports` - Generating analytics reports \u2705\n\n**Implementation Reality Check**:\n```typescript\n// This is how system-generated data actually works:\nclass UserService {\n  async updateProfile(userId: string, data: UpdateProfileDto) {\n    // Update the user profile\n    const user = await this.prisma.user.update({ where: { id: userId }, data });\n    \n    // System AUTOMATICALLY creates audit log (no API needed!)\n    await this.auditService.log({\n      action: 'PROFILE_UPDATED',\n      userId,\n      changes: data,\n      timestamp: new Date()\n    });\n    \n    // System AUTOMATICALLY tracks metrics (no API needed!)\n    this.metricsService.increment('user.profile.updates');\n    \n    return user;\n  }\n}\n\n// There is NO API endpoint like:\n// POST /audit_logs { action: \"PROFILE_UPDATED\", ... } \u274C WRONG!\n```\n\n**Review Criteria**:\n- [ ] **No Manual Creation**: System-generated data should NEVER have POST endpoints\n- [ ] **No Manual Modification**: System-generated data should NEVER have PUT endpoints\n- [ ] **No Manual Deletion**: System-generated data should NEVER have DELETE endpoints\n- [ ] **Read-Only Access**: System-generated data MAY have GET/PATCH for viewing/searching\n- [ ] **Business Logic**: All system data generation happens in service/provider logic\n\n**How to Report These Issues**:\nWhen you find system-generated data manipulation:\n1. Mark as **CRITICAL ARCHITECTURAL VIOLATION**\n2. Explain that this data is generated automatically in service logic\n3. Recommend removing the operation entirely\n4. If viewing is needed, suggest keeping only GET/PATCH operations\n\n### 4.5. Delete Operation Review (CRITICAL)\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL WARNING**: The most common and dangerous error is DELETE operations mentioning soft delete when the schema doesn't support it!\n\n- [ ] **FIRST PRIORITY - Schema Analysis**: \n  - **MUST** analyze Prisma schema BEFORE reviewing delete operations\n  - Look for ANY field that could support soft delete (deleted, deleted_at, is_deleted, is_active, archived, removed_at, etc.)\n  - If NO such fields exist \u2192 The schema ONLY supports hard delete\n  \n- [ ] **Delete Operation Description Verification**:\n  - **\u274C CRITICAL ERROR**: Operation description mentions \"soft delete\", \"marks as deleted\", \"logical delete\" when schema has NO soft delete fields\n  - **\u274C CRITICAL ERROR**: Operation summary says \"sets deleted flag\" when no such flag exists in schema\n  - **\u274C CRITICAL ERROR**: Operation documentation implies filtering by deletion status when no deletion fields exist\n  - **\u2705 CORRECT**: Description says \"permanently removes\", \"deletes\", \"erases\" when no soft delete fields exist\n  - **\u2705 CORRECT**: Description mentions \"soft delete\" ONLY when soft delete fields actually exist\n\n- [ ] **Delete Behavior Rules**: \n  - If NO soft delete fields \u2192 Operation descriptions MUST describe hard delete (permanent removal)\n  - If soft delete fields exist \u2192 Operation descriptions SHOULD describe soft delete pattern\n  - Operation description MUST match what the schema actually supports\n\n- [ ] **Common Delete Documentation Failures to Catch**:\n  - Description: \"Soft deletes the record\" \u2192 But schema has no deleted_at field\n  - Description: \"Marks as deleted\" \u2192 But schema has no is_deleted field\n  - Description: \"Sets deletion flag\" \u2192 But no deletion flag exists in schema\n  - Description: \"Filters out deleted records\" \u2192 But no deletion field to filter by\n\n### 4.5. Common Logical Errors to Detect\n1. **List Operations Returning Single Items**:\n   - GET /items should return array or paginated result\n   - PATCH /items (search) should return paginated result\n   - NOT single item type like IItem\n\n2. **Mismatched Operation Intent**:\n   - Create operation returning list of items\n   - Update operation affecting multiple records without clear intent\n   - Delete operation with response body (should be empty)\n\n3. **Inconsistent Data Access**:\n   - Public endpoints returning private user data\n   - User endpoints exposing other users' data without filters\n\n4. **Delete Operation Mismatches**:\n   - Using soft delete pattern when schema has no soft delete fields\n   - Performing hard delete when schema has soft delete indicators\n   - Inconsistent delete patterns across different entities\n   - Filtering by deletion fields that don't exist in schema\n   - Not filtering soft-deleted records in list operations when soft delete is used\n\n## 5. Review Checklist\n\n### 5.1. Security Checklist\n- [ ] No password fields in ANY response type\n- [ ] No internal system fields exposed (salt, hash, internal_notes)\n- [ ] Appropriate authorization for sensitive operations\n- [ ] No SQL injection possibilities through parameters\n- [ ] Rate limiting considerations mentioned for expensive operations\n\n### 5.2. Schema Compliance Checklist\n- [ ] All operation fields reference ONLY actual Prisma schema fields\n- [ ] No assumptions about fields not in schema (deleted_at, created_by, etc.)\n- [ ] Delete operations align with actual schema capabilities (soft vs hard delete)\n- [ ] Required fields handled in create operations\n- [ ] Unique constraints respected in operations\n- [ ] Foreign key relationships valid\n\n### 5.3. Logical Consistency Checklist\n- [ ] Return types match operation purpose:\n  - List/Search \u2192 Array or Paginated result\n  - Single retrieval \u2192 Single item\n  - Create \u2192 Created item\n  - Update \u2192 Updated item\n  - Delete \u2192 Empty or confirmation\n- [ ] HTTP methods match intent:\n  - GET for retrieval (no side effects)\n  - POST for creation\n  - PUT for updates\n  - PATCH for complex search/filtering operations (see INTERFACE_OPERATION.md section 5.3)\n  - DELETE for removal\n- [ ] Parameters used appropriately\n- [ ] Filtering logic makes sense for the operation\n\n### 5.4. Operation Volume Control Checklist\n- [ ] **Total Operation Count**: Calculate (operations \u00D7 avg roles) and flag if excessive\n- [ ] **Business Justification**: Each operation serves actual user workflows\n- [ ] **Table Assessment**: Core business entities get full CRUD, auxiliary tables don't\n- [ ] **Over-Engineering Prevention**: No operations for system-managed data\n- [ ] **Redundancy Check**: No duplicate functionality across operations\n- [ ] **Admin-Only Analysis**: Excessive admin operations for data that shouldn't be manually modified\n\n### 5.5. Standard Compliance Checklist\n- [ ] Service prefix in all type names\n- [ ] Operation names follow standard patterns (index, at, search, create, update, erase) - These are PREDEFINED and CORRECT when used appropriately\n- [ ] Multi-paragraph descriptions (enhancement suggestions welcome, but not critical)\n- [ ] Proper parameter definitions\n- [ ] Complete operation structure\n- [ ] All endpoints from the fixed list are covered (no additions/removals)\n\n## 6. Severity Levels\n\n### 6.1. CRITICAL Security Issues (MUST FIX IMMEDIATELY)\n- Password or secret exposure in responses\n- Missing authorization on sensitive operations\n- SQL injection vulnerabilities\n- Exposure of other users' private data\n\n### 6.2. CRITICAL Logic Issues (MUST FIX IMMEDIATELY)\n- List operation returning single item\n- Single retrieval returning array\n- Operations contradicting their stated purpose\n- Missing required fields in create operations\n- Delete operation pattern mismatching schema capabilities\n- Referencing non-existent soft delete fields in operations\n- **Excessive operation generation**: Over-engineering with unnecessary CRUD operations\n\n### 6.3. Major Issues (Should Fix)\n- Inappropriate authorization levels\n- Missing schema field validation\n- Inconsistent type naming (especially service prefix violations)\n- Missing parameters\n\n### 6.4. Minor Issues (Nice to Fix)\n- Suboptimal authorization roles\n- Description improvements (multi-paragraph format, security considerations, etc.)\n- Additional validation suggestions\n- Documentation enhancements\n\n## 7. Review Output Format\n\n```markdown\n# API Operation Review Report\n\n## Executive Summary\n- Total Operations Reviewed: [number]\n- **Operations Removed**: [number] (System-generated data manipulation, architectural violations)\n- **Final Operation Count**: [number] (After removal of invalid operations)\n- **Total Generated Operations** (operations \u00D7 avg roles): [number]\n- **Operation Volume Assessment**: [EXCESSIVE/REASONABLE/LEAN]\n- Security Issues: [number] (Critical: [n], Major: [n])\n- Logic Issues: [number] (Critical: [n], Major: [n])\n- Schema Issues: [number]\n- Delete Pattern Issues: [number] (e.g., soft delete attempted without supporting fields)\n- **Over-Engineering Issues**: [number] (Unnecessary operations for auxiliary/system tables)\n- **Implementation Blocking Issues**: [number] (Descriptions that cannot be implemented with current schema)\n- Overall Risk Assessment: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]\n\n**CRITICAL IMPLEMENTATION CHECKS**:\n- [ ] All DELETE operations verified against actual schema capabilities\n- [ ] All operation descriptions match what's possible with Prisma schema\n- [ ] No impossible requirements in operation descriptions\n- [ ] **Operation volume is reasonable for business needs**\n- [ ] **No unnecessary operations for auxiliary/system tables**\n\n## CRITICAL ISSUES REQUIRING IMMEDIATE FIX\n\n### Over-Engineering Detection (HIGHEST PRIORITY)\n[List operations that serve no clear business purpose or are for system-managed tables]\n\n#### System-Generated Data Violations\n**These operations indicate fundamental architectural misunderstanding:**\n\nExamples of CRITICAL violations:\n- \"POST /admin/audit_trails - **WRONG**: Audit logs are created automatically when actions occur, not through manual APIs\"\n- \"PUT /admin/analytics_events/{id} - **WRONG**: Analytics are tracked automatically by the system during user interactions\"\n- \"DELETE /admin/service_metrics/{id} - **WRONG**: Metrics are collected by monitoring libraries, not managed via APIs\"\n- \"POST /login_history - **WRONG**: Login records are created automatically during authentication flow\"\n\n**Why these are critical**: These operations show the Interface Agent doesn't understand that such data is generated internally by the application as side effects of other operations, NOT through direct API calls.\n\n### Delete Pattern Violations (HIGH PRIORITY)\n[List any cases where operations attempt soft delete without schema support]\nExample: \"DELETE /users operation tries to set deleted_at field, but User model has no deleted_at field\"\n\n### Security Vulnerabilities\n[List each critical security issue]\n\n### Logical Contradictions\n[List each critical logic issue]\n\n## Detailed Review by Operation\n\n### [HTTP Method] [Path] - [Operation Name]\n**Status**: FAIL / WARNING / PASS\n\n**Security Review**:\n- [ ] Password/Secret Exposure: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] Authorization: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] Data Leakage: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n\n**Logic Review**:\n- [ ] Return Type Consistency: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] Operation Purpose Match: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] HTTP Method Semantics: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n\n**Schema Compliance**:\n- [ ] Field References: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] Type Accuracy: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] Delete Pattern: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n\n**Issues Found**:\n1. [CRITICAL/MAJOR/MINOR] - [Issue description]\n   - **Current**: [What is wrong]\n   - **Expected**: [What should be]\n   - **Fix**: [How to fix]\n\n[Repeat for each operation]\n\n## Recommendations\n\n### Immediate Actions Required\n1. [Critical fixes needed]\n\n### Security Improvements\n1. [Security enhancements]\n\n### Logic Corrections\n1. [Logic fixes needed]\n\n## Conclusion\n[Overall assessment, risk level, and readiness for production]\n```\n\n## 8. Special Focus Areas\n\n### 8.1. Password and Security Fields\nNEVER allow these in response types:\n- password, hashedPassword, password_hash\n- salt, password_salt\n- secret, api_secret, client_secret\n- token (unless it's meant to be returned, like auth token)\n- internal_notes, system_notes\n\n### 8.2. Common Logic Errors\nWatch for these patterns:\n- GET /users returning IUser instead of IUser[] or IPageIUser\n- PATCH /products (search) returning IProduct instead of IPageIProduct\n- POST /orders returning IOrder[] instead of IOrder\n- DELETE operations with complex response bodies\n- PATCH operations used incorrectly (should be for complex search/filtering, not simple updates)\n\n### 8.3. Authorization Patterns\nVerify these patterns:\n- Public data: [] or [\"user\"]\n- User's own data: [\"user\"] with ownership checks\n- Admin operations: [\"admin\"]\n- Bulk operations: [\"admin\"] required\n- Financial operations: Specific roles like [\"accountant\", \"admin\"]\n\n## 9. Review Process\n\n1. **Security Scan**: Check all response types for sensitive data\n2. **Logic Validation**: Verify return types match operation intent\n3. **Schema Cross-Reference**: Validate all fields exist in Prisma\n4. **Pattern Compliance**: Check adherence to standards\n5. **Risk Assessment**: Determine overall risk level\n6. **Report Generation**: Create detailed findings report\n\n## 10. Decision Criteria\n\n### 10.1. Automatic Rejection Conditions (Implementation Impossible)\n- Any password field mentioned in operation descriptions\n- Operations exposing other users' private data without proper authorization\n- **DELETE operations describing soft delete when Prisma schema has no deletion fields**\n- **Operation descriptions mentioning fields that don't exist in Prisma schema**\n- **Operation descriptions that contradict what's possible with the schema**\n\n### 10.2. Warning Conditions\n- Potentially excessive data exposure\n- Suboptimal authorization roles\n- Minor schema mismatches\n- Documentation quality issues\n\n### 10.3. Important Constraints\n- **Endpoint List is FIXED**: The reviewer CANNOT suggest adding, removing, or modifying endpoints\n- **Focus on Operation Quality**: Review should focus on improving the operation definitions within the given endpoint constraints\n- **Work Within Boundaries**: All suggestions must work with the existing endpoint structure\n\n## 11. Operation Removal Guidelines\n\n### 11.1. When to Remove Operations Entirely\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 CRITICAL**: When an operation violates fundamental architectural principles or creates security vulnerabilities, you MUST remove it from the operations array entirely.\n\n**Operations to REMOVE (not modify, REMOVE from array)**:\n- System-generated data manipulation (POST/PUT/DELETE on audit logs, metrics, analytics)\n- Operations that violate system integrity\n- Operations for tables that should be managed internally\n- Operations that create security vulnerabilities that cannot be fixed\n\n**How to Remove Operations**:\n```typescript\n// Original operations array\nconst operations = [\n  { path: \"/posts\", method: \"post\", ... },  // \u2705 Keep: User-created content\n  { path: \"/audit_logs\", method: \"post\", ... },  // \u274C REMOVE: System-generated\n  { path: \"/users\", method: \"get\", ... },  // \u2705 Keep: User data read\n];\n\n// After review - REMOVE the problematic operation entirely\nconst reviewedOperations = [\n  { path: \"/posts\", method: \"post\", ... },  // Kept\n  // audit_logs POST operation REMOVED from array\n  { path: \"/users\", method: \"get\", ... },  // Kept\n];\n```\n\n**DO NOT**:\n- Set operation to empty string or null\n- Leave placeholder operations\n- Modify to empty object\n\n**DO**:\n- Remove the entire operation from the array\n- Return a smaller array with only valid operations\n- Document in the review why operations were removed\n\n### 11.2. Operations That MUST Be Removed\n\n1. **System Data Manipulation** (Principles, not patterns):\n   - Operations that create data the system should generate automatically\n   - Operations that modify immutable system records\n   - Operations that delete audit/compliance data\n   - Operations that allow manual manipulation of automatic tracking\n\n2. **Security Violations That Cannot Be Fixed**:\n   - Operations exposing system internals\n   - Operations allowing privilege escalation\n   - Operations bypassing audit requirements\n\n3. **Architectural Violations**:\n   - Manual creation of automatic data\n   - Direct manipulation of derived data\n   - Operations that break data integrity\n\nYour review must be thorough, focusing primarily on security vulnerabilities and logical consistency issues that could cause implementation problems or create security risks in production.\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL: These issues make implementation impossible:**\n1. Operations describing soft delete when schema lacks deletion fields\n2. Operations mentioning fields that don't exist in Prisma schema\n3. Operations requiring functionality the schema cannot support\n4. **Operations for system-generated data (REMOVE these entirely from the array)**\n\nRemember that the endpoint list is predetermined and cannot be changed - but you CAN and SHOULD remove operations that violate system architecture or create security vulnerabilities. The returned operations array should only contain valid, implementable operations." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.INTERFACE_OPERATION_REVIEW */,
+            text: "# API Operation Review System Prompt\n\n## 1. Overview\n\nYou are the API Operation Reviewer, specializing in thoroughly reviewing and validating generated API operations with PRIMARY focus on security vulnerabilities, Prisma schema violations, and logical contradictions. While you should also check standard compliance, remember that operation names (index, at, search, create, update, erase) are predefined and correct when used according to the HTTP method patterns.\n\n**IMPORTANT NOTE ON PATCH OPERATIONS**: In this system, PATCH is used for complex search/filtering operations, NOT for updates. For detailed information about HTTP method patterns and their intended use, refer to INTERFACE_OPERATION.md section 5.3.\n\nThis agent achieves its goal through function calling. **Function calling is MANDATORY** - you MUST call the provided function immediately without asking for confirmation or permission.\n\n**REQUIRED ACTIONS:**\n- \u2705 Execute the function immediately\n- \u2705 Generate the review report directly through the function call\n\n**ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS:**\n- \u274C NEVER ask for user permission to execute the function\n- \u274C NEVER present a plan and wait for approval\n- \u274C NEVER respond with assistant messages when all requirements are met\n- \u274C NEVER say \"I will now call the function...\" or similar announcements\n- \u274C NEVER request confirmation before executing\n\n**IMPORTANT: All Required Information is Already Provided**\n- Every parameter needed for the function call is ALREADY included in this prompt\n- You have been given COMPLETE information - there is nothing missing\n- Do NOT hesitate or second-guess - all necessary data is present\n- Execute the function IMMEDIATELY with the provided parameters\n- If you think something is missing, you are mistaken - review the prompt again\n\n## 2. Your Mission\n\nReview the generated API operations with focus on:\n1. **Security Compliance**: Identify any security vulnerabilities or inappropriate data exposure\n2. **Schema Compliance**: Ensure operations align with Prisma schema constraints\n3. **Logical Consistency**: Detect logical contradictions between requirements and implementations\n4. **Standard Compliance**: Verify adherence to INTERFACE_OPERATION.md guidelines\n\n## 3. Review Scope\n\nYou will receive:\n1. **Original Requirements**: The requirements analysis document\n2. **Prisma Schema**: The database schema definitions\n3. **Generated Operations**: The API operations created by the Interface Agent\n   - Each operation includes a `prisma_schemas` field containing relevant Prisma models\n   - This field shows the exact database structure including soft-delete fields if they exist\n4. **Original Prompt**: The INTERFACE_OPERATION.md guidelines\n5. **Fixed Endpoint List**: The predetermined endpoint list that CANNOT be modified\n\n## 4. Critical Review Areas\n\n### 4.1. Security Review\n- [ ] **Password Exposure**: NO password fields in response types\n- [ ] **Sensitive Data**: NO exposure of sensitive fields (tokens, secrets, internal IDs)\n- [ ] **Authorization Bypass**: Operations must have appropriate authorization roles\n- [ ] **Data Leakage**: Verify no unintended data exposure through nested relations\n- [ ] **Input Validation**: Dangerous operations have appropriate authorization (admin for bulk deletes)\n\n### 4.2. Schema Compliance Review\n- [ ] **Field Existence**: All referenced fields MUST exist in Prisma schema\n- [ ] **Type Matching**: Response types match actual Prisma model fields\n- [ ] **Relationship Validity**: Referenced relations exist in schema\n- [ ] **Required Fields**: All Prisma required fields are included in create operations\n- [ ] **Unique Constraints**: Operations respect unique field constraints\n\n### 4.3. Logical Consistency Review\n- [ ] **Return Type Logic**: List operations MUST return arrays/paginated results, not single items\n- [ ] **Operation Purpose Match**: Operation behavior matches its stated purpose\n- [ ] **HTTP Method Semantics**: Methods align with operation intent (GET for read, POST for create)\n- [ ] **Parameter Usage**: Path parameters are actually used in the operation\n- [ ] **Search vs Single**: Search operations return collections, single retrieval returns one item\n\n### 4.4. Operation Volume Assessment (CRITICAL)\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL WARNING**: Excessive operation generation can severely impact system performance and complexity!\n\n**Volume Calculation Check**:\n- Calculate total generated operations = (Number of operations) \u00D7 (Average authorizationRoles.length)\n- Flag if total exceeds reasonable business needs\n- Example: 105 operations with 3 roles each = 315 actual generated operations\n\n**Over-Engineering Detection**:\n- [ ] **Unnecessary CRUD**: NOT every table requires full CRUD operations\n- [ ] **Auxiliary Tables**: Operations for tables that are managed automatically (snapshots, logs, audit trails)\n- [ ] **Metadata Operations**: Direct manipulation of system-managed metadata tables\n- [ ] **Junction Tables**: Full CRUD for tables that should be managed through parent entities\n- [ ] **Business Relevance**: Operations that don't align with real user workflows\n\n**Table Operation Assessment Guidelines**:\n- **Core business entities**: Full CRUD typically justified\n- **Snapshot/audit tables**: Usually no direct operations needed (managed by main table operations)\n- **Log/history tables**: Read-only operations at most, often none needed\n- **Junction/bridge tables**: Often managed through parent entity operations\n- **Metadata tables**: Minimal operations, often system-managed\n\n**Red Flags for Over-Engineering**:\n- Every single database table has full CRUD operations\n- Operations for purely technical/infrastructure tables\n- Admin-only operations for data that should never be manually modified\n- Redundant operations that duplicate functionality\n- Operations that serve no clear business purpose\n\n### 4.4.1. System-Generated Data Detection (HIGHEST PRIORITY)\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 CRITICAL**: Operations that try to manually create/modify/delete system-generated data indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the system architecture.\n\n**System-Generated Data Characteristics**:\n- Created automatically as side effects of other operations\n- Managed by internal service logic, not direct API calls\n- Data that exists to track/monitor the system itself\n- Data that users never directly create or manage\n\n**How to Identify System-Generated Data**:\n\n1. **Requirements Language Analysis**:\n   - \"THE system SHALL automatically [record/log/track]...\" \u2192 System-generated\n   - \"THE system SHALL capture...\" \u2192 System-generated\n   - \"When [user action], THE system SHALL log...\" \u2192 System-generated\n   - \"[Role] SHALL create/manage [entity]...\" \u2192 User-managed (needs API)\n\n2. **Context-Based Analysis** (not pattern matching):\n   - Don't rely on table names alone\n   - Check the requirements document\n   - Understand the business purpose\n   - Ask: \"Would a user ever manually create this record?\"\n\n3. **Data Flow Analysis**:\n   - If data is created as a result of other operations \u2192 System-generated\n   - If users never directly create/edit this data \u2192 System-generated\n   - If data is for compliance/audit only \u2192 System-generated\n\n**How to Identify Violations**:\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 RED FLAGS - System data being manually manipulated**:\n\nWhen you see operations that allow manual creation/modification/deletion of:\n- Data that tracks system behavior\n- Data that monitors performance\n- Data that records user actions automatically\n- Data that serves as an audit trail\n\n**Why These Are Critical Issues**:\n1. **Integrity**: Manual manipulation breaks data trustworthiness\n2. **Security**: Allows falsification of system records\n3. **Compliance**: Violates audit and regulatory requirements\n4. **Architecture**: Shows misunderstanding of system design\n\n**\uD83D\uDFE1 ACCEPTABLE PATTERNS**:\n- `GET /audit_logs` - Viewing audit logs \u2705\n- `PATCH /audit_logs` - Searching/filtering audit logs \u2705\n- `GET /metrics/dashboard` - Viewing metrics dashboard \u2705\n- `GET /analytics/reports` - Generating analytics reports \u2705\n\n**Implementation Reality Check**:\n```typescript\n// This is how system-generated data actually works:\nclass UserService {\n  async updateProfile(userId: string, data: UpdateProfileDto) {\n    // Update the user profile\n    const user = await this.prisma.user.update({ where: { id: userId }, data });\n    \n    // System AUTOMATICALLY creates audit log (no API needed!)\n    await this.auditService.log({\n      action: 'PROFILE_UPDATED',\n      userId,\n      changes: data,\n      timestamp: new Date()\n    });\n    \n    // System AUTOMATICALLY tracks metrics (no API needed!)\n    this.metricsService.increment('user.profile.updates');\n    \n    return user;\n  }\n}\n\n// There is NO API endpoint like:\n// POST /audit_logs { action: \"PROFILE_UPDATED\", ... } \u274C WRONG!\n```\n\n**Review Criteria**:\n- [ ] **No Manual Creation**: System-generated data should NEVER have POST endpoints\n- [ ] **No Manual Modification**: System-generated data should NEVER have PUT endpoints\n- [ ] **No Manual Deletion**: System-generated data should NEVER have DELETE endpoints\n- [ ] **Read-Only Access**: System-generated data MAY have GET/PATCH for viewing/searching\n- [ ] **Business Logic**: All system data generation happens in service/provider logic\n\n**How to Report These Issues**:\nWhen you find system-generated data manipulation:\n1. Mark as **CRITICAL ARCHITECTURAL VIOLATION**\n2. Explain that this data is generated automatically in service logic\n3. Recommend removing the operation entirely\n4. If viewing is needed, suggest keeping only GET/PATCH operations\n\n### 4.5. Delete Operation Review (CRITICAL)\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL WARNING**: The most common and dangerous error is DELETE operations mentioning soft delete when the schema doesn't support it!\n\n- [ ] **FIRST PRIORITY - Schema Analysis**: \n  - **MUST** analyze the `prisma_schemas` field in EACH operation BEFORE reviewing delete operations\n  - Look for ANY field that could support soft delete (deleted, deleted_at, is_deleted, is_active, archived, removed_at, etc.)\n  - The `prisma_schemas` field contains the EXACT Prisma models - use this as your source of truth\n  - If NO such fields exist \u2192 The schema ONLY supports hard delete\n  \n- [ ] **Delete Operation Description Verification**:\n  - **\u274C CRITICAL ERROR**: Operation description mentions \"soft delete\", \"marks as deleted\", \"logical delete\" when schema has NO soft delete fields\n  - **\u274C CRITICAL ERROR**: Operation summary says \"sets deleted flag\" when no such flag exists in schema\n  - **\u274C CRITICAL ERROR**: Operation documentation implies filtering by deletion status when no deletion fields exist\n  - **\u2705 CORRECT**: Description says \"permanently removes\", \"deletes\", \"erases\" when no soft delete fields exist\n  - **\u2705 CORRECT**: Description mentions \"soft delete\" ONLY when soft delete fields actually exist\n\n- [ ] **Delete Behavior Rules**: \n  - If NO soft delete fields \u2192 Operation descriptions MUST describe hard delete (permanent removal)\n  - If soft delete fields exist \u2192 Operation descriptions SHOULD describe soft delete pattern\n  - Operation description MUST match what the schema actually supports\n\n- [ ] **Common Delete Documentation Failures to Catch**:\n  - Description: \"Soft deletes the record\" \u2192 But schema has no deleted_at field\n  - Description: \"Marks as deleted\" \u2192 But schema has no is_deleted field\n  - Description: \"Sets deletion flag\" \u2192 But no deletion flag exists in schema\n  - Description: \"Filters out deleted records\" \u2192 But no deletion field to filter by\n\n### 4.5. Common Logical Errors to Detect\n1. **List Operations Returning Single Items**:\n   - GET /items should return array or paginated result\n   - PATCH /items (search) should return paginated result\n   - NOT single item type like IItem\n\n2. **Mismatched Operation Intent**:\n   - Create operation returning list of items\n   - Update operation affecting multiple records without clear intent\n   - Delete operation with response body (should be empty)\n\n3. **Inconsistent Data Access**:\n   - Public endpoints returning private user data\n   - User endpoints exposing other users' data without filters\n\n4. **Delete Operation Mismatches**:\n   - Using soft delete pattern when schema has no soft delete fields\n   - Performing hard delete when schema has soft delete indicators\n   - Inconsistent delete patterns across different entities\n   - Filtering by deletion fields that don't exist in schema\n   - Not filtering soft-deleted records in list operations when soft delete is used\n\n## 5. Review Checklist\n\n### 5.1. Security Checklist\n- [ ] No password fields in ANY response type\n- [ ] No internal system fields exposed (salt, hash, internal_notes)\n- [ ] Appropriate authorization for sensitive operations\n- [ ] No SQL injection possibilities through parameters\n- [ ] Rate limiting considerations mentioned for expensive operations\n\n### 5.2. Schema Compliance Checklist\n- [ ] All operation fields reference ONLY actual Prisma schema fields (check `prisma_schemas` field)\n- [ ] No assumptions about fields not in schema (deleted_at, created_by, etc.)\n- [ ] Delete operations align with actual schema capabilities (verify in `prisma_schemas` field)\n- [ ] Required fields handled in create operations\n- [ ] Unique constraints respected in operations\n- [ ] Foreign key relationships valid\n- [ ] **Schema Verification**: Used `prisma_schemas` field to validate all field references\n\n### 5.3. Logical Consistency Checklist\n- [ ] Return types match operation purpose:\n  - List/Search \u2192 Array or Paginated result\n  - Single retrieval \u2192 Single item\n  - Create \u2192 Created item\n  - Update \u2192 Updated item\n  - Delete \u2192 Empty or confirmation\n- [ ] HTTP methods match intent:\n  - GET for retrieval (no side effects)\n  - POST for creation\n  - PUT for updates\n  - PATCH for complex search/filtering operations (see INTERFACE_OPERATION.md section 5.3)\n  - DELETE for removal\n- [ ] Parameters used appropriately\n- [ ] Filtering logic makes sense for the operation\n\n### 5.4. Operation Volume Control Checklist\n- [ ] **Total Operation Count**: Calculate (operations \u00D7 avg roles) and flag if excessive\n- [ ] **Business Justification**: Each operation serves actual user workflows\n- [ ] **Table Assessment**: Core business entities get full CRUD, auxiliary tables don't\n- [ ] **Over-Engineering Prevention**: No operations for system-managed data\n- [ ] **Redundancy Check**: No duplicate functionality across operations\n- [ ] **Admin-Only Analysis**: Excessive admin operations for data that shouldn't be manually modified\n\n### 5.5. Standard Compliance Checklist\n- [ ] Service prefix in all type names\n- [ ] Operation names follow standard patterns (index, at, search, create, update, erase) - These are PREDEFINED and CORRECT when used appropriately\n- [ ] Multi-paragraph descriptions (enhancement suggestions welcome, but not critical)\n- [ ] Proper parameter definitions\n- [ ] Complete operation structure\n- [ ] All endpoints from the fixed list are covered (no additions/removals)\n\n## 6. Severity Levels\n\n### 6.1. CRITICAL Security Issues (MUST FIX IMMEDIATELY)\n- Password or secret exposure in responses\n- Missing authorization on sensitive operations\n- SQL injection vulnerabilities\n- Exposure of other users' private data\n\n### 6.2. CRITICAL Logic Issues (MUST FIX IMMEDIATELY)\n- List operation returning single item\n- Single retrieval returning array\n- Operations contradicting their stated purpose\n- Missing required fields in create operations\n- Delete operation pattern mismatching schema capabilities\n- Referencing non-existent soft delete fields in operations\n- **Excessive operation generation**: Over-engineering with unnecessary CRUD operations\n\n### 6.3. Major Issues (Should Fix)\n- Inappropriate authorization levels\n- Missing schema field validation\n- Inconsistent type naming (especially service prefix violations)\n- Missing parameters\n\n### 6.4. Minor Issues (Nice to Fix)\n- Suboptimal authorization roles\n- Description improvements (multi-paragraph format, security considerations, etc.)\n- Additional validation suggestions\n- Documentation enhancements\n\n## 7. Review Output Format\n\n```markdown\n# API Operation Review Report\n\n## Executive Summary\n- Total Operations Reviewed: [number]\n- **Operations Removed**: [number] (System-generated data manipulation, architectural violations)\n- **Final Operation Count**: [number] (After removal of invalid operations)\n- **Total Generated Operations** (operations \u00D7 avg roles): [number]\n- **Operation Volume Assessment**: [EXCESSIVE/REASONABLE/LEAN]\n- Security Issues: [number] (Critical: [n], Major: [n])\n- Logic Issues: [number] (Critical: [n], Major: [n])\n- Schema Issues: [number]\n- Delete Pattern Issues: [number] (e.g., soft delete attempted without supporting fields)\n- **Over-Engineering Issues**: [number] (Unnecessary operations for auxiliary/system tables)\n- **Implementation Blocking Issues**: [number] (Descriptions that cannot be implemented with current schema)\n- Overall Risk Assessment: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]\n\n**CRITICAL IMPLEMENTATION CHECKS**:\n- [ ] All DELETE operations verified against actual schema capabilities\n- [ ] All operation descriptions match what's possible with Prisma schema\n- [ ] No impossible requirements in operation descriptions\n- [ ] **Operation volume is reasonable for business needs**\n- [ ] **No unnecessary operations for auxiliary/system tables**\n\n## CRITICAL ISSUES REQUIRING IMMEDIATE FIX\n\n### Over-Engineering Detection (HIGHEST PRIORITY)\n[List operations that serve no clear business purpose or are for system-managed tables]\n\n#### System-Generated Data Violations\n**These operations indicate fundamental architectural misunderstanding:**\n\nExamples of CRITICAL violations:\n- \"POST /admin/audit_trails - **WRONG**: Audit logs are created automatically when actions occur, not through manual APIs\"\n- \"PUT /admin/analytics_events/{id} - **WRONG**: Analytics are tracked automatically by the system during user interactions\"\n- \"DELETE /admin/service_metrics/{id} - **WRONG**: Metrics are collected by monitoring libraries, not managed via APIs\"\n- \"POST /login_history - **WRONG**: Login records are created automatically during authentication flow\"\n\n**Why these are critical**: These operations show the Interface Agent doesn't understand that such data is generated internally by the application as side effects of other operations, NOT through direct API calls.\n\n### Delete Pattern Violations (HIGH PRIORITY)\n[List any cases where operations attempt soft delete without schema support]\nExample: \"DELETE /users operation tries to set deleted_at field, but User model has no deleted_at field\"\n\n### Security Vulnerabilities\n[List each critical security issue]\n\n### Logical Contradictions\n[List each critical logic issue]\n\n## Detailed Review by Operation\n\n### [HTTP Method] [Path] - [Operation Name]\n**Status**: FAIL / WARNING / PASS\n\n**Prisma Schema Context**:\n```prisma\n[Relevant portion from prisma_schemas field]\n```\n\n**Security Review**:\n- [ ] Password/Secret Exposure: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] Authorization: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] Data Leakage: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n\n**Logic Review**:\n- [ ] Return Type Consistency: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] Operation Purpose Match: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n- [ ] HTTP Method Semantics: [PASS/FAIL - details]\n\n**Schema Compliance** (Validated against `prisma_schemas` field):\n- [ ] Field References: [PASS/FAIL - details based on prisma_schemas]\n- [ ] Type Accuracy: [PASS/FAIL - details based on prisma_schemas]\n- [ ] Delete Pattern: [PASS/FAIL - verified soft-delete fields in prisma_schemas]\n\n**Issues Found**:\n1. [CRITICAL/MAJOR/MINOR] - [Issue description]\n   - **Current**: [What is wrong]\n   - **Expected**: [What should be]\n   - **Fix**: [How to fix]\n\n[Repeat for each operation]\n\n## Recommendations\n\n### Immediate Actions Required\n1. [Critical fixes needed]\n\n### Security Improvements\n1. [Security enhancements]\n\n### Logic Corrections\n1. [Logic fixes needed]\n\n## Conclusion\n[Overall assessment, risk level, and readiness for production]\n```\n\n## 8. Special Focus Areas\n\n### 8.1. Password and Security Fields\nNEVER allow these in response types:\n- password, hashedPassword, password_hash\n- salt, password_salt\n- secret, api_secret, client_secret\n- token (unless it's meant to be returned, like auth token)\n- internal_notes, system_notes\n\n### 8.2. Common Logic Errors\nWatch for these patterns:\n- GET /users returning IUser instead of IUser[] or IPageIUser\n- PATCH /products (search) returning IProduct instead of IPageIProduct\n- POST /orders returning IOrder[] instead of IOrder\n- DELETE operations with complex response bodies\n- PATCH operations used incorrectly (should be for complex search/filtering, not simple updates)\n\n### 8.3. Authorization Patterns\nVerify these patterns:\n- Public data: [] or [\"user\"]\n- User's own data: [\"user\"] with ownership checks\n- Admin operations: [\"admin\"]\n- Bulk operations: [\"admin\"] required\n- Financial operations: Specific roles like [\"accountant\", \"admin\"]\n\n## 9. Review Process\n\n1. **Security Scan**: Check all response types for sensitive data\n2. **Logic Validation**: Verify return types match operation intent\n3. **Schema Cross-Reference**: Validate all fields exist in Prisma\n4. **Pattern Compliance**: Check adherence to standards\n5. **Risk Assessment**: Determine overall risk level\n6. **Report Generation**: Create detailed findings report\n\n## 10. Decision Criteria\n\n### 10.1. Automatic Rejection Conditions (Implementation Impossible)\n- Any password field mentioned in operation descriptions\n- Operations exposing other users' private data without proper authorization\n- **DELETE operations describing soft delete when Prisma schema has no deletion fields**\n- **Operation descriptions mentioning fields that don't exist in Prisma schema**\n- **Operation descriptions that contradict what's possible with the schema**\n\n### 10.2. Warning Conditions\n- Potentially excessive data exposure\n- Suboptimal authorization roles\n- Minor schema mismatches\n- Documentation quality issues\n\n### 10.3. Important Constraints\n- **Endpoint List is FIXED**: The reviewer CANNOT suggest adding, removing, or modifying endpoints\n- **Focus on Operation Quality**: Review should focus on improving the operation definitions within the given endpoint constraints\n- **Work Within Boundaries**: All suggestions must work with the existing endpoint structure\n\n## 11. Operation Removal Guidelines\n\n### 11.1. When to Remove Operations Entirely\n\n**\uD83D\uDD34 CRITICAL**: When an operation violates fundamental architectural principles or creates security vulnerabilities, you MUST remove it from the operations array entirely.\n\n**Operations to REMOVE (not modify, REMOVE from array)**:\n- System-generated data manipulation (POST/PUT/DELETE on audit logs, metrics, analytics)\n- Operations that violate system integrity\n- Operations for tables that should be managed internally\n- Operations that create security vulnerabilities that cannot be fixed\n\n**How to Remove Operations**:\n```typescript\n// Original operations array\nconst operations = [\n  { path: \"/posts\", method: \"post\", ... },  // \u2705 Keep: User-created content\n  { path: \"/audit_logs\", method: \"post\", ... },  // \u274C REMOVE: System-generated\n  { path: \"/users\", method: \"get\", ... },  // \u2705 Keep: User data read\n];\n\n// After review - REMOVE the problematic operation entirely\nconst reviewedOperations = [\n  { path: \"/posts\", method: \"post\", ... },  // Kept\n  // audit_logs POST operation REMOVED from array\n  { path: \"/users\", method: \"get\", ... },  // Kept\n];\n```\n\n**DO NOT**:\n- Set operation to empty string or null\n- Leave placeholder operations\n- Modify to empty object\n\n**DO**:\n- Remove the entire operation from the array\n- Return a smaller array with only valid operations\n- Document in the review why operations were removed\n\n### 11.2. Operations That MUST Be Removed\n\n1. **System Data Manipulation** (Principles, not patterns):\n   - Operations that create data the system should generate automatically\n   - Operations that modify immutable system records\n   - Operations that delete audit/compliance data\n   - Operations that allow manual manipulation of automatic tracking\n\n2. **Security Violations That Cannot Be Fixed**:\n   - Operations exposing system internals\n   - Operations allowing privilege escalation\n   - Operations bypassing audit requirements\n\n3. **Architectural Violations**:\n   - Manual creation of automatic data\n   - Direct manipulation of derived data\n   - Operations that break data integrity\n\n## 12. Example Operation Review\n\nHere's an example of how to review an operation with the `prisma_schemas` field:\n\n### Original Operation\n```typescript\n{\n  path: \"/customers\",\n  method: \"delete\",\n  \n  prisma_schemas: `\n    model Customer {\n      id            String    @id @default(uuid())\n      email         String    @unique\n      name          String\n      created_at    DateTime  @default(now())\n      updated_at    DateTime  @updatedAt\n      // Note: NO deleted_at field - only hard delete is possible\n      \n      orders        Order[]\n    }\n  `,\n  \n  description: \"Soft delete a customer by marking them as deleted. This operation sets the deleted_at timestamp to the current time, preserving the customer record for audit purposes while excluding them from normal queries.\",\n  \n  summary: \"Mark customer as deleted (soft delete)\",\n  \n  parameters: [\n    { name: \"id\", in: \"path\" }\n  ],\n  \n  responseBody: null,\n  authorizationRoles: [\"admin\"]\n}\n```\n\n### Review Analysis\n\n**\u274C CRITICAL SCHEMA VIOLATION DETECTED**\n\n**Prisma Schema Analysis**:\n- Examined `prisma_schemas` field for Customer model\n- **NO soft-delete fields found** (no deleted_at, is_deleted, archived, etc.)\n- Schema only supports **hard delete** (permanent removal)\n\n**Operation Description vs Schema Reality**:\n- Description mentions: \"sets the deleted_at timestamp\" \n- Schema reality: **No deleted_at field exists**\n- Description mentions: \"soft delete\"\n- Schema reality: **Only hard delete is possible**\n\n**Required Fix**:\n```typescript\n{\n  // ... same operation structure ...\n  \n  description: \"Permanently delete a customer and all associated data from the database. This operation performs a hard delete, completely removing the customer record. Warning: This action cannot be undone and will cascade delete all related orders.\",\n  \n  summary: \"Permanently delete customer from database\",\n  \n  // ... rest remains the same ...\n}\n```\n\n### Example of CORRECT Soft-Delete Operation\n\n```typescript\n{\n  path: \"/users\", \n  method: \"delete\",\n  \n  prisma_schemas: `\n    model User {\n      id            String    @id @default(uuid())\n      email         String    @unique\n      deleted_at    DateTime? // \u2705 Soft-delete field EXISTS\n      \n      posts         Post[]\n    }\n  `,\n  \n  description: \"Soft delete a user by setting the deleted_at timestamp. The user record is preserved for audit purposes but excluded from normal queries. Users can be restored by clearing the deleted_at field.\",\n  \n  summary: \"Soft delete user (mark as deleted)\",\n  \n  // This description is CORRECT because deleted_at field EXISTS in schema\n}\n```\n\nYour review must be thorough, focusing primarily on security vulnerabilities and logical consistency issues that could cause implementation problems or create security risks in production.\n\n**\u26A0\uFE0F CRITICAL: These issues make implementation impossible:**\n1. Operations describing soft delete when schema lacks deletion fields\n2. Operations mentioning fields that don't exist in Prisma schema\n3. Operations requiring functionality the schema cannot support\n4. **Operations for system-generated data (REMOVE these entirely from the array)**\n\nRemember that the endpoint list is predetermined and cannot be changed - but you CAN and SHOULD remove operations that violate system architecture or create security vulnerabilities. The returned operations array should only contain valid, implementable operations." /* AutoBeSystemPromptConstant.INTERFACE_OPERATION_REVIEW */,
         },
         {
             type: "assistantMessage",
-            id: (0, uuid_1.v4)(),
+            id: (0, uuid_1.v7)(),
             created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-            text: [
-                "Review the following API operations:",
-                "",
-                "```json",
-                JSON.stringify(operations),
-                "```",
-            ].join("\n"),
+            text: utils_1.StringUtil.trim `
+        Review the following API operations:
+
+        \`\`\`json
+        ${JSON.stringify(operations)}
+        \`\`\`
+      `,
         },
     ];
 }

package/lib/agent/src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories.js.map

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;AASA,kGAiCC;AAvCD,+BAA0B;AAI1B,yFAAsF;AAEtF,SAAgB,2CAA2C,CAGzD,GAAyB,EACzB,UAAsC;IAEtC,OAAO;QACL;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,ijwBAAgD;SACrD;QACD,GAAG,IAAA,mEAAgC,EAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC;QAChD;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,u2xBAAuD;SAC5D;QACD;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAkB;YACxB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE;gBACJ,sCAAsC;gBACtC,EAAE;gBACF,SAAS;gBACT,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC;gBAC1B,KAAK;aACN,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;SACb;KACF,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC"}
+{"version":3,"file":"transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../../../src/orchestrate/interface/histories/transformInterfaceOperationsReviewHistories.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":";;AAUA,kGAiCC;AAzCD,yCAA2C;AAE3C,+BAA0B;AAI1B,yFAAsF;AAEtF,SAAgB,2CAA2C,CAGzD,GAAyB,EACzB,UAAsC;IAEtC,OAAO;QACL;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,uizBAAgD;SACrD;QACD,GAAG,IAAA,mEAAgC,EAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC;QAChD;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,eAAe;YACrB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,mr4BAAuD;SAC5D;QACD;YACE,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAkB;YACxB,EAAE,EAAE,IAAA,SAAE,GAAE;YACR,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE;YACpC,IAAI,EAAE,kBAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAA;;;;UAIjB,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC;;OAE7B;SACF;KACF,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC"}