@atcn/subledger 1.4.0 → 1.5.0

package/dist/verify.js

@@ -1,10 +1,15 @@
 import { verifyClosurePackage } from "@atcn/core";
-import { ClosurePackageSchema, digestOf, executionBinding, resolveAttestations, verifyPayload } from "@atcn/schema";
+import { AgentTraceSchema, ClosurePackageSchema, canonicalize, digestOf, executionBinding, resolveAttestations, summarizeTrace, traceDigest, traceProblems, utf8Decode, verifyPayload, } from "@atcn/schema";
 import { CLEARING_SOURCE, clearingFacts, settlementEvidence, undoneBatch } from "./bridge.js";
 import { CLOSURE_DOCUMENT_TYPE, RECEIPT_DOCUMENT_TYPE, SignedClosureSchema, SignedReceiptSchema, SIGNED_BY_HOSTED_SERVICE, SUBLEDGER_VERIFIER_VERSION, SUPPORTED_SUBLEDGER_SCHEMA_VERSIONS, } from "./documents.js";
-import { labelResponses, receiptTotals, responseAttestation, rollupFor } from "./projection.js";
+import { DERIVED_EXCEPTION_KINDS, SERVICE_ONLY_EXCEPTION_KINDS, deriveTaskExceptions } from "./exceptions.js";
+import { buildExpectationReport, expectationSignatureProblem } from "./expectations.js";
+import { closureDisclosure, deliveryStatus, labelResponses, receiptTotals, responseAttestation, rollupFor, signerKeyBindings } from "./projection.js";
 import { verifyCountersignature, verifyStatementSignature } from "./response.js";
-import { ATTESTABLE_FIELDS } from "./types.js";
+import { outcomeSignatureProblem } from "./outcome.js";
+import { buildRailAttestationReport, railAttestationProblem } from "./rails.js";
+import { attestableFieldsFor } from "./types.js";
+import { usageChecksFor } from "./usage.js";
 const SERVICE_ACTOR = "svc_atcn";
 function check(name, problems) {
     return { name, ok: problems.length === 0, details: problems };
@@ -53,6 +58,17 @@ export function verifySubledgerDocument(input, options) {
 function finish(documentType, checks) {
     return { valid: checks.every((c) => c.ok), document_type: documentType, checks };
 }
+const NOT_CANONICAL = "payload is not canonical JSON: numbers must be safe integers";
+/** Free-form parts of a payload, such as an embedded rail record, can hold numbers that no signature could cover. */
+function isCanonical(payload) {
+    try {
+        canonicalize(payload);
+        return true;
+    }
+    catch {
+        return false;
+    }
+}
 function schemaFailure(documentType, issues) {
     return finish(documentType, [check("schema", issues.map((i) => `${i.path.map(String).join(".")}: ${i.message}`))]);
 }
@@ -103,6 +119,111 @@ function schema14Problems(version, delegations, responses, claims) {
     }
     return problems;
 }
+/** A document that declares 1.2, 1.3 or 1.4 must not carry 1.5 fields, which those verifiers would drop before checking signatures. */
+function schema15Problems(version, parts) {
+    if (!["1.2", "1.3", "1.4"].includes(version))
+        return [];
+    const problems = [];
+    for (const d of parts.delegations) {
+        if (d.pricing !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow pricing on delegation ${d.delegation_id}`);
+        if (d.refund_terms !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow refund_terms on delegation ${d.delegation_id}`);
+        if (d.witness_policy !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow witness_policy on delegation ${d.delegation_id}`);
+        if (d.execution?.agent.additional_models !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow additional_models on delegation ${d.delegation_id}`);
+    }
+    for (const c of parts.claims) {
+        if (c.usage !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow usage on delivery claim ${c.event_id}`);
+        if (c.signer !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow signer on delivery claim ${c.event_id}`);
+    }
+    for (const e of parts.events) {
+        if (e.skill !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow skill on financial event ${e.financial_event_id}`);
+        if (e.normalized_status === "pending_finality")
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow status pending_finality on financial event ${e.financial_event_id}`);
+        if (e.type === "estimate" || e.type === "hold")
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow ${e.type} events (financial event ${e.financial_event_id})`);
+        if (e.expectation !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow expectation on financial event ${e.financial_event_id}`);
+        if (e.rail_attestation !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow rail_attestation on financial event ${e.financial_event_id}`);
+    }
+    if (parts.hasUsageChecks)
+        problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow usage_checks`);
+    if (parts.hasExpectationReport)
+        problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow expectation_report`);
+    if (parts.hasEstimateTolerance)
+        problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow task estimate_tolerance_bps`);
+    if (parts.hasRailAttestations)
+        problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow rail_attestations`);
+    if (parts.hasReceiptKeyBindings)
+        problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow key_bindings on a receipt`);
+    if (parts.hasResolvedExceptions)
+        problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow resolved_exceptions`);
+    for (const r of parts.responses)
+        if (r.statement.role !== undefined)
+            problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow statement role (response ${r.response_id})`);
+    const usageFieldUsed = parts.fieldLists.some((list) => list.includes("delivery.usage")) || parts.responses.some((r) => r.statement.fields.includes("delivery.usage") || r.statement.corrections.some((c) => c.field === "delivery.usage"));
+    if (usageFieldUsed)
+        problems.push(`schema ${version} does not allow the delivery.usage field`);
+    return problems;
+}
+/**
+ * Recomputes each recorded usage summary from its trace file. Usage whose trace was not supplied is reported as not
+ * inspected; it neither passes nor fails. A supplied file that is not a well-formed trace fails.
+ */
+function traceSummaryCheck(claims, traceFiles) {
+    const name = "trace_summary";
+    const withUsage = claims.filter((c) => c.usage !== undefined);
+    if (withUsage.length === 0)
+        return { name, ok: true, details: ["no usage recorded"] };
+    const problems = [];
+    const traces = new Map();
+    (traceFiles ?? []).forEach((bytes, index) => {
+        const trace = parseTraceFile(bytes);
+        if (typeof trace === "string")
+            problems.push(`trace file ${index + 1}: ${trace}`);
+        else
+            traces.set(traceDigest(trace), trace);
+    });
+    const notInspected = [];
+    const used = new Set();
+    for (const claim of withUsage) {
+        const usage = claim.usage;
+        const trace = traces.get(usage.trace_digest);
+        if (!trace) {
+            notInspected.push(`not inspected: delivery claim ${claim.event_id} (trace ${usage.trace_digest} not supplied)`);
+            continue;
+        }
+        used.add(usage.trace_digest);
+        if (digestOf(summarizeTrace(trace)) !== digestOf(usage.summary))
+            problems.push(`delivery claim ${claim.event_id}: recorded usage does not match its trace ${usage.trace_digest}`);
+    }
+    if (problems.length > 0)
+        return check(name, problems);
+    const unused = [...traces.keys()].filter((d) => !used.has(d)).map((d) => `supplied trace ${d} matches no recorded usage`);
+    const inspected = withUsage.length - notInspected.length;
+    const details = [...(inspected > 0 ? [`${inspected} recorded usage summary(ies) match their traces`] : []), ...notInspected, ...unused];
+    return inspected === 0 ? { name, ok: true, details, state: "not_inspected" } : { name, ok: true, details };
+}
+function parseTraceFile(bytes) {
+    let raw;
+    try {
+        raw = JSON.parse(utf8Decode(bytes));
+    }
+    catch {
+        return "not JSON";
+    }
+    const parsed = AgentTraceSchema.safeParse(raw);
+    if (!parsed.success)
+        return `not a trace: ${parsed.error.issues[0].path.join(".")}: ${parsed.error.issues[0].message}`;
+    const problems = traceProblems(parsed.data);
+    return problems.length > 0 ? `malformed trace: ${problems.join("; ")}` : parsed.data;
+}
 function reversalProblems(events) {
     const byId = new Map(events.map((e) => [e.financial_event_id, e]));
     const problems = [];
@@ -122,11 +243,22 @@ export function verifyReceipt(input, options) {
     const parsed = SignedReceiptSchema.safeParse(input);
     if (!parsed.success)
         return schemaFailure(RECEIPT_DOCUMENT_TYPE, parsed.error.issues);
+    if (!isCanonical(parsed.data.payload))
+        return finish(RECEIPT_DOCUMENT_TYPE, [check("schema", [NOT_CANONICAL])]);
     const doc = parsed.data;
     const r = doc.payload;
     const schemaProblems = [
         ...versionFeatureProblems(r.schema_version, r.issuer.signed_by, r.delivery_claims, false),
         ...schema14Problems(r.schema_version, [r.delegation], [], r.delivery_claims),
+        ...schema15Problems(r.schema_version, {
+            delegations: [r.delegation],
+            claims: r.delivery_claims,
+            events: r.financial_events,
+            responses: [],
+            fieldLists: [Object.keys(r.field_status), r.unverified_fields, ...r.corrections.map((c) => c.fields)],
+            hasUsageChecks: false,
+            hasReceiptKeyBindings: r.key_bindings !== undefined,
+        }),
     ];
     const checks = [check("schema", schemaProblems), signatureCheck(doc, r.issued_at, options.trustedKeys), operatorSignatureCheck(r, r.issuer.operator_id, doc.operator_signatures, options)];
     const events = r.financial_events.map(({ allocation_version: _version, ...e }) => ({ ...e, liability_owner: null, economic_event_id: null, fx: null }));
@@ -134,17 +266,59 @@ export function verifyReceipt(input, options) {
     const recomputed = receiptTotals(r.delegation, events);
     checks.push(check("totals", digestOf(recomputed) === digestOf(r.totals) ? [] : ["totals do not match the listed financial events"]));
     const fieldProblems = [];
-    const expectedUnverified = ATTESTABLE_FIELDS.filter((f) => r.field_status[f] !== "missing");
+    const fields = attestableFieldsFor(r.schema_version);
+    const expectedUnverified = fields.filter((f) => r.field_status[f] !== "missing");
     if (digestOf(expectedUnverified) !== digestOf(r.unverified_fields))
         fieldProblems.push("unverified_fields must list every non-missing field");
-    for (const f of ATTESTABLE_FIELDS)
+    for (const f of fields)
         if (!r.field_status[f])
             fieldProblems.push(`field_status is missing ${f}`);
     checks.push(check("field_disclosure", fieldProblems));
+    checks.push(receiptSignedRecordsCheck(r, events));
     checks.push(receiptChainCheck(r, options));
     checks.push(receiptExpiryCheck(r, options.at ?? new Date().toISOString()));
+    checks.push(traceSummaryCheck(r.delivery_claims, options.traces));
     return finish(RECEIPT_DOCUMENT_TYPE, checks);
 }
+/**
+ * Provider-signed outcome claims and signed estimates and holds on a receipt must verify against the key bindings it
+ * lists, which must be exactly the bindings their signers name; only verified claims may be labelled provider_key_signed.
+ */
+function receiptSignedRecordsCheck(r, events) {
+    const name = "signed_records";
+    const listed = r.key_bindings ?? [];
+    const problems = [];
+    if (digestOf(signerKeyBindings(r.delivery_claims, events, listed)) !== digestOf(listed))
+        problems.push("key_bindings must list exactly the bindings the receipt's signers name, in binding_id order");
+    const delegation = { provider_id: r.provider.provider_id, provider_job_ref: r.delegation.provider_job_ref };
+    for (const claim of r.delivery_claims) {
+        const labelled = claim.assurance.includes("provider_key_signed");
+        if (!claim.signer) {
+            if (labelled)
+                problems.push(`${claim.type} claim ${claim.event_id} is labelled provider_key_signed without a signature`);
+            continue;
+        }
+        const problem = outcomeSignatureProblem({ ...claim, delegation_id: r.delegation.delegation_id }, delegation, listed);
+        if (problem)
+            problems.push(problem);
+        else if (!labelled)
+            problems.push(`${claim.type} claim ${claim.event_id} is signed but not labelled provider_key_signed`);
+    }
+    for (const e of events) {
+        if (!e.expectation)
+            continue;
+        const problem = expectationSignatureProblem(e, r.provider.provider_id, listed);
+        if (problem)
+            problems.push(problem);
+    }
+    if (problems.length > 0)
+        return check(name, problems);
+    const claims = r.delivery_claims.filter((c) => c.signer).length;
+    const estimates = events.filter((e) => e.expectation?.signer).length;
+    if (claims + estimates === 0)
+        return { name, ok: true, details: ["no signed claims, estimates or holds"] };
+    return { name, ok: true, details: [`${claims} provider-signed outcome claim(s) and ${estimates} signed estimate/hold record(s) verify against the listed key bindings`] };
+}
 /** The issuer signed expires_at, so a receipt past it no longer stands, even though its signature still verifies. */
 function receiptExpiryCheck(r, at) {
     if (r.expires_at === null)
@@ -184,11 +358,25 @@ export function verifyClosure(input, options) {
     const parsed = SignedClosureSchema.safeParse(input);
     if (!parsed.success)
         return schemaFailure(CLOSURE_DOCUMENT_TYPE, parsed.error.issues);
+    if (!isCanonical(parsed.data.payload))
+        return finish(CLOSURE_DOCUMENT_TYPE, [check("schema", [NOT_CANONICAL])]);
     const doc = parsed.data;
     const c = doc.payload;
     const schemaProblems = [
         ...versionFeatureProblems(c.schema_version, c.issuer.signed_by, c.delivery_claims, c.obligation_links !== undefined),
         ...schema14Problems(c.schema_version, c.delegations, c.responses, c.delivery_claims),
+        ...schema15Problems(c.schema_version, {
+            delegations: c.delegations,
+            claims: c.delivery_claims,
+            events: c.financial_events.map((e) => e.record),
+            responses: c.responses,
+            fieldLists: [],
+            hasUsageChecks: c.usage_checks !== undefined,
+            hasExpectationReport: c.expectation_report !== undefined,
+            hasEstimateTolerance: c.task.estimate_tolerance_bps !== undefined,
+            hasRailAttestations: c.rail_attestations !== undefined,
+            hasResolvedExceptions: c.resolved_exceptions !== undefined,
+        }),
     ];
     const checks = [check("schema", schemaProblems), signatureCheck(doc, c.generated_at, options.trustedKeys), operatorSignatureCheck(c, c.issuer.operator_id, doc.operator_signatures, options)];
     const digestProblems = c.financial_events.filter((e) => digestOf(e.record) !== e.event_digest).map((e) => `event ${e.record.financial_event_id} digest mismatch`);
@@ -201,11 +389,177 @@ export function verifyClosure(input, options) {
     checks.push(check("allocations", allocationProblems(c)));
     const recomputed = rollupFor(c.task, c.delegations, c.financial_events, c.allocations);
     checks.push(check("totals", digestOf(recomputed) === digestOf(c.rollup) ? [] : ["roll-up does not match events, attribution, and allocations"]));
+    checks.push(derivedFieldsCheck(c));
     checks.push(providerResponsesCheck(c));
     checks.push(closureChainCheck(c, options));
     checks.push(obligationLinkCheck(c, options));
+    checks.push(usageChecksCheck(c, recomputed));
+    checks.push(expectationsCheck(c, recomputed));
+    checks.push(openExceptionsCheck(c));
+    checks.push(signedClaimsCheck(c));
+    checks.push(railAttestationsCheck(c));
+    checks.push(traceSummaryCheck(c.delivery_claims, options.traces));
     return finish(CLOSURE_DOCUMENT_TYPE, checks);
 }
+/**
+ * Each embedded rail attestation must verify offline (Merkle inclusion for A2A-SE, the payer's signature for x402) and
+ * agree with its event, and rail_attestations must list exactly those events.
+ */
+function railAttestationsCheck(c) {
+    const name = "rail_attestations";
+    const problems = [];
+    for (const { record } of c.financial_events) {
+        const problem = railAttestationProblem(record);
+        if (problem)
+            problems.push(`${record.type} ${record.financial_event_id}: rail attestation refused (${problem.code}): ${problem.detail}`);
+    }
+    const expected = buildRailAttestationReport(c.financial_events);
+    if (digestOf(expected ?? null) !== digestOf(c.rail_attestations ?? null))
+        problems.push("rail_attestations do not match the closure's payment and refund records");
+    if (problems.length > 0)
+        return check(name, problems);
+    if (!expected)
+        return { name, ok: true, details: ["no rail attestations"] };
+    return { name, ok: true, details: [`${expected.length} payment/refund record(s) rail_attested, re-verified offline without contacting the rail`, ...expected.map((e) => e.anchor)] };
+}
+const isRecomputableException = (kind) => DERIVED_EXCEPTION_KINDS.includes(kind) && !SERVICE_ONLY_EXCEPTION_KINDS.includes(kind);
+/** The derived exceptions a closure's own records imply at close, as of generated_at; the service must list each as open or resolved. */
+export function closureDerivedExceptions(c) {
+    return deriveTaskExceptions({
+        task: c.task,
+        delegations: c.delegations,
+        claims: c.delivery_claims,
+        events: c.financial_events,
+        rollup: rollupFor(c.task, c.delegations, c.financial_events, c.allocations),
+        now: c.generated_at,
+        responses: c.responses,
+        receipts: c.receipts,
+        key_bindings: c.key_bindings,
+        closing: true,
+    }).filter((d) => isRecomputableException(d.kind));
+}
+/**
+ * Schema 1.5: the derived exceptions recomputed from the closure's own records, as of generated_at and at close, must
+ * each be open or listed as resolved by a person, and no open derived exception may lack its condition. Witness quorum
+ * (it needs the service's verified domains) and exceptions raised at intake are not recomputed.
+ */
+function openExceptionsCheck(c) {
+    const name = "open_exceptions";
+    if (["1.2", "1.3", "1.4"].includes(c.schema_version))
+        return { name, ok: true, details: [`schema ${c.schema_version}: open exceptions are not recomputed`] };
+    const derived = closureDerivedExceptions(c);
+    const sameCondition = (x, d) => x.kind === d.kind && x.delegation_id === d.delegation_id && x.detail === d.detail;
+    const open = c.open_exceptions.filter((x) => isRecomputableException(x.kind));
+    const resolved = c.resolved_exceptions ?? [];
+    const problems = c.open_exceptions.filter((x) => x.status !== "open").map((x) => `open_exceptions lists ${x.kind} exception ${x.exception_id} with status ${x.status}`);
+    for (const d of derived) {
+        if (!open.some((x) => sameCondition(x, d)) && !resolved.some((x) => sameCondition(x, d)))
+            problems.push(`${d.kind} on ${d.delegation_id ?? c.task.task_id} holds but is neither open nor resolved: ${d.detail}`);
+    }
+    for (const x of open)
+        if (!derived.some((d) => sameCondition(x, d)))
+            problems.push(`${x.kind} exception ${x.exception_id} is open but its condition does not hold at generated_at`);
+    for (const x of resolved) {
+        if (x.status === "open" || x.resolved_by === "system")
+            problems.push(`resolved exception ${x.exception_id} must be resolved or dismissed by a person`);
+        if (!derived.some((d) => sameCondition(x, d)))
+            problems.push(`resolved exception ${x.exception_id} (${x.kind}) does not match a condition that holds at generated_at`);
+    }
+    if (problems.length > 0)
+        return check(name, problems);
+    return {
+        name,
+        ok: true,
+        details: [
+            `${derived.length} derived exception(s) recomputed as of generated_at: ${derived.length - resolved.length} open, ${resolved.length} resolved by a person`,
+            "not recomputed: witness_quorum_not_met (needs the service's verified domains) and exceptions raised at intake",
+        ],
+    };
+}
+/** Provider-signed outcome claims must verify against the listed key bindings, and only they may be labelled provider_key_signed. */
+function signedClaimsCheck(c) {
+    const name = "signed_claims";
+    const delegationOf = new Map(c.delegations.map((d) => [d.delegation_id, d]));
+    const problems = [];
+    for (const claim of c.delivery_claims) {
+        const labelled = claim.assurance.includes("provider_key_signed");
+        if (!claim.signer) {
+            if (labelled)
+                problems.push(`${claim.type} claim ${claim.event_id} is labelled provider_key_signed without a signature`);
+            continue;
+        }
+        const delegation = delegationOf.get(claim.delegation_id);
+        const problem = delegation ? outcomeSignatureProblem(claim, delegation, c.key_bindings) : `${claim.type} claim ${claim.event_id} names a delegation not in the closure`;
+        if (problem)
+            problems.push(problem);
+        else if (!labelled)
+            problems.push(`${claim.type} claim ${claim.event_id} is signed but not labelled provider_key_signed`);
+    }
+    if (problems.length > 0)
+        return check(name, problems);
+    const signed = c.delivery_claims.filter((claim) => claim.signer).length;
+    return { name, ok: true, details: [signed > 0 ? `${signed} provider-signed outcome claim(s) verify` : "no provider-signed outcome claims"] };
+}
+/** Fields the closure derives from its own records must be exactly what those records produce: each delegation's delivery status, the lineage summary and the disclosure lists. */
+function derivedFieldsCheck(c) {
+    const problems = [];
+    for (const d of c.delegations) {
+        const expected = deliveryStatus(c.delivery_claims.filter((claim) => claim.delegation_id === d.delegation_id));
+        if (d.delivery_status !== expected)
+            problems.push(`delegation ${d.delegation_id} delivery status ${d.delivery_status} does not follow from its claims (${expected})`);
+    }
+    if (c.lineage.complete !== (c.lineage.capture_gaps.length === 0))
+        problems.push("lineage.complete does not match the capture gaps");
+    const unknownDownstream = c.delegations.filter((d) => d.downstream_visibility === "unknown").map((d) => d.delegation_id);
+    if (digestOf(unknownDownstream) !== digestOf(c.lineage.unknown_downstream))
+        problems.push("lineage.unknown_downstream does not match the delegations");
+    const disclosure = closureDisclosure({
+        task: c.task,
+        delegations: c.delegations,
+        claims: c.delivery_claims,
+        events: c.financial_events.map((e) => ({ record: e.record, attributed_to: e.attributed_to })),
+        responses: c.responses,
+        receipts: c.receipts,
+        ...(["1.2", "1.3", "1.4"].includes(c.schema_version) ? {} : { generated_at: c.generated_at }),
+    });
+    if (digestOf(disclosure) !== digestOf(c.disclosure))
+        problems.push("disclosure lists do not match the closure's records");
+    return check("derived_fields", problems);
+}
+/** The closure's usage checks must be exactly what its pricing, usage claims, roll-up and responses produce. */
+function usageChecksCheck(c, rollup) {
+    const name = "usage_checks";
+    const expected = usageChecksFor(c.delegations, c.delivery_claims, rollup, c.responses, c.receipts);
+    const recorded = c.usage_checks ?? [];
+    if (digestOf(expected) !== digestOf(recorded))
+        return check(name, ["usage_checks do not match the delegations' pricing, recorded usage and billed amounts"]);
+    if (recorded.length === 0)
+        return { name, ok: true, details: ["no delegation has both pricing and recorded usage"] };
+    const outside = recorded.filter((u) => u.within_tolerance === false || u.expected_minor === null).map((u) => u.delegation_id);
+    return { name, ok: true, details: [`${recorded.length} usage check(s) recomputed`, ...(outside.length > 0 ? [`outside tolerance or unpriced: ${outside.join(", ")}`] : [])] };
+}
+/** Signed estimates and holds must verify, and the expectation report must be exactly what the closure's records produce. */
+function expectationsCheck(c, rollup) {
+    const name = "expectations";
+    const providerOf = new Map(c.delegations.map((d) => [d.delegation_id, d.provider_id]));
+    const problems = [];
+    for (const e of c.financial_events) {
+        if (!e.record.expectation)
+            continue;
+        const problem = expectationSignatureProblem(e.record, providerOf.get(e.attributed_to) ?? null, c.key_bindings);
+        if (problem)
+            problems.push(problem);
+    }
+    const expected = buildExpectationReport({ task: c.task, delegations: c.delegations, claims: c.delivery_claims, events: c.financial_events, rollup, key_bindings: c.key_bindings });
+    if (digestOf(expected ?? null) !== digestOf(c.expectation_report ?? null))
+        problems.push("expectation_report does not match the closure's estimates, holds and costs");
+    if (problems.length > 0)
+        return check(name, problems);
+    if (!expected)
+        return { name, ok: true, details: ["no estimates or holds"] };
+    const signed = expected.records.filter((r) => !r.assurance.includes("buyer_recorded")).length;
+    return { name, ok: true, details: [`${expected.records.length} estimate/hold record(s), ${signed} signed by the agent or a gateway; report recomputed`, "recorded only: nothing was enforced, blocked or reserved"] };
+}
 /**
  * Delegations backed by clearing-network obligations. Every event recorded from the clearing journal must sit on a
  * linked delegation. With the obligations' closure packages, each package must verify, contain the linked decision,
@@ -403,10 +757,12 @@ function responseProblems(c) {
                 problems.push(`response ${response.response_id} cites run ${s.execution.execution_id}, which is not the run recorded on delegation ${receipt.delegation_id}`);
         }
         const claimsKeySigned = response.assurance.includes("provider_key_signed");
-        if (!claimsKeySigned)
-            continue;
         const sig = response.provider_signature;
         const binding = sig ? c.key_bindings.find((b) => b.binding_id === sig.binding_id && b.key_id === sig.key_id) : undefined;
+        if (s.role === "witness")
+            problems.push(...witnessStatementProblems(response, delegations.get(receipt.delegation_id)?.provider_id ?? null, claimsKeySigned ? binding : undefined));
+        if (!claimsKeySigned)
+            continue;
         if (!sig || !binding)
             problems.push(`response ${response.response_id} claims provider_key_signed without a listed key binding`);
         else if (binding.provider_id !== response.provider_id)
@@ -418,6 +774,28 @@ function responseProblems(c) {
     }
     return problems;
 }
+/**
+ * A witness statement is a signed_attestation that cites the run and at least one evidence item, signed with a
+ * domain-challenged key of a provider other than the delegation's own.
+ */
+function witnessStatementProblems(response, delegationProviderId, binding) {
+    const s = response.statement;
+    const problems = [];
+    const label = `witness response ${response.response_id}`;
+    if (s.response_type !== "signed_attestation")
+        problems.push(`${label} must be a signed_attestation`);
+    if (!s.execution)
+        problems.push(`${label} must cite the run it observed`);
+    if (s.evidence.length === 0)
+        problems.push(`${label} must cite the evidence it saw`);
+    if (!binding)
+        problems.push(`${label} must be signed with a listed key binding`);
+    else if (binding.method !== "domain_challenge")
+        problems.push(`${label} must be signed with a domain-challenged key`);
+    if (response.provider_id !== null && response.provider_id === delegationProviderId)
+        problems.push(`${label} is from the delegation's own provider`);
+    return problems;
+}
 function closureChainCheck(c, options) {
     if (c.version === 1)
         return check("version_chain", c.previous_closure_digest === null && c.previous_closure_id === null ? [] : ["version 1 must not reference a previous closure"]);

package/package.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "@atcn/subledger",
-  "version": "1.4.0",
-  "description": "Agent Work Subledger: deterministic attribution, roll-up, exceptions, signed receipts and closures, and offline verification",
+  "version": "1.5.0",
+  "description": "The cost record for an AI agent job: matches charges to delegated work, flags what doesn't add up, and signs closures anyone can verify offline",
   "license": "Apache-2.0",
   "repository": {
     "type": "git",
@@ -33,8 +33,10 @@
     "build": "tsc -p tsconfig.build.json"
   },
   "dependencies": {
-    "@atcn/core": "1.4.0",
-    "@atcn/schema": "1.4.0",
+    "@atcn/core": "1.5.0",
+    "@atcn/schema": "1.5.0",
+    "@noble/curves": "^1.9.0",
+    "@noble/hashes": "^1.8.0",
     "zod": "^4.1.0"
   }
 }

package/test-vectors/reconciliation-results.json

@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+{
+  "rail_id": "atcn",
+  "rail_url": "https://github.com/fadnisnikhil/atcn",
+  "artefact_id": "atcn-reconciliation-v1",
+  "schema_version": "1.1",
+  "atcn_version": "1.5.0",
+  "method": "in-process run against the local runner's subledger (same rules as the hosted API): examples/local-runner/scripts/reconciliation.ts",
+  "verdicts": {
+    "BLOCK": "the attack does not change the books: refused or absorbed at intake",
+    "REVIEW": "recorded, with an open exception flagging it for a person"
+  },
+  "vectors": [
+    {
+      "vector_id": "atcn-recon-double-charge-replay-001",
+      "artefact_id": "atcn-reconciliation-v1",
+      "attack_class": "double_charge",
+      "expected_verdict": "BLOCK",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "observed": {
+        "refused_steps": [],
+        "deduplicated_steps": [
+          4
+        ],
+        "exception_kinds": [],
+        "net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1000
+        },
+        "closed_net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1000
+        },
+        "closures_verify_offline": true
+      },
+      "adapter_notes": ""
+    },
+    {
+      "vector_id": "atcn-recon-double-charge-distinct-001",
+      "artefact_id": "atcn-reconciliation-v1",
+      "attack_class": "double_charge",
+      "expected_verdict": "REVIEW",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "observed": {
+        "refused_steps": [],
+        "deduplicated_steps": [],
+        "exception_kinds": [
+          "amount_mismatch"
+        ],
+        "net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 2000
+        },
+        "closed_net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 2000
+        },
+        "closures_verify_offline": true
+      },
+      "adapter_notes": ""
+    },
+    {
+      "vector_id": "atcn-recon-cross-task-replay-001",
+      "artefact_id": "atcn-reconciliation-v1",
+      "attack_class": "cross_task_replay",
+      "expected_verdict": "BLOCK",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "observed": {
+        "refused_steps": [
+          6
+        ],
+        "deduplicated_steps": [],
+        "exception_kinds": [
+          "duplicate_event"
+        ],
+        "net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1000,
+          "B": 0
+        },
+        "closed_net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1000,
+          "B": 0
+        },
+        "closures_verify_offline": true
+      },
+      "adapter_notes": ""
+    },
+    {
+      "vector_id": "atcn-recon-refund-after-close-001",
+      "artefact_id": "atcn-reconciliation-v1",
+      "attack_class": "refund_after_close",
+      "expected_verdict": "REVIEW",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "observed": {
+        "refused_steps": [],
+        "deduplicated_steps": [],
+        "exception_kinds": [
+          "refund_after_close"
+        ],
+        "net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 0
+        },
+        "closed_net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1000
+        },
+        "closures_verify_offline": true
+      },
+      "adapter_notes": ""
+    },
+    {
+      "vector_id": "atcn-recon-charge-after-cancel-001",
+      "artefact_id": "atcn-reconciliation-v1",
+      "attack_class": "charge_after_cancel",
+      "expected_verdict": "REVIEW",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "observed": {
+        "refused_steps": [],
+        "deduplicated_steps": [],
+        "exception_kinds": [
+          "charge_after_cancellation",
+          "missing_receipt"
+        ],
+        "net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1000
+        },
+        "closed_net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1000
+        },
+        "closures_verify_offline": true
+      },
+      "adapter_notes": ""
+    },
+    {
+      "vector_id": "atcn-recon-backdated-estimate-001",
+      "artefact_id": "atcn-reconciliation-v1",
+      "attack_class": "backdated_estimate",
+      "expected_verdict": "REVIEW",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "observed": {
+        "refused_steps": [],
+        "deduplicated_steps": [],
+        "exception_kinds": [
+          "estimate_after_charge"
+        ],
+        "net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1500
+        },
+        "closed_net_cost_minor": {
+          "A": 1500
+        },
+        "closures_verify_offline": true
+      },
+      "adapter_notes": ""
+    }
+  ]
+}