@astryxdesign/cli 0.7.2-canary.fe2c655 → 0.7.2

package/api/integration/check/check.mjs

@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@
+// Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
+
+/**
+ * @file `astryx integration check`: every `doctor integration` check in one
+ * call, for a package's own build.
+ *
+ * Runs `validate`, `components`, `templates` and `docs` against the
+ * integration package in `cwd` and counts each result the way that check's
+ * own subcommand exits, so the
+ * run fails exactly when one of them would. With `strict` it also fails on
+ * any warning and on any check, or comparison a check carries, that did not
+ * run, so a package can gate its build on its docs staying in sync. `--strict`
+ * adds no check: it reports the same warnings and skipped work again, as
+ * errors in the checks' own issue format, and fails on them.
+ *
+ * What fails it is a contract for the builds that run it: a new check, or a
+ * new failure code, joins only in a minor release that names it.
+ * `test/integration-check-failures.test.mjs` lists each one, so adding one
+ * shows up in review.
+ *
+ * @input A local or installed integration package.
+ * @output Each check's own envelope with its errors, warnings and skipped
+ *   work, the totals, and whether the run fails.
+ * @position Backs `astryx integration check`.
+ */
+
+import {
+  integrationComponentConflicts,
+  integrationDocConflicts,
+  integrationTemplateConflicts,
+} from '../authoring-checks.mjs';
+import {
+  summarizeIssues,
+  validateIntegration,
+} from '../validate-integration.mjs';
+
+/** @typedef {import('../integration-check.type.mjs').IntegrationCheckName} IntegrationCheckName */
+/** @typedef {import('../integration-check.type.mjs').IntegrationCheckReport} IntegrationCheckReport */
+/** @typedef {import('../integration-check.type.mjs').IntegrationCheckResponse} IntegrationCheckResponse */
+/** @typedef {import('../integration-check.type.mjs').IntegrationCheckResult} IntegrationCheckResult */
+/** @typedef {import('../integration-check.type.mjs').IntegrationCheckOptions} IntegrationCheckOptions */
+/** @typedef {import('../integration-check.type.mjs').IntegrationCheckCommandResponse} IntegrationCheckCommandResponse */
+/** @typedef {import('../integration-check.type.mjs').IntegrationCheckFailure} IntegrationCheckFailure */
+
+/** The checks `integration check` runs, in the order it runs them. */
+export const INTEGRATION_CHECKS = /** @type {const} */ ([
+  'validate',
+  'components',
+  'templates',
+  'docs',
+]);
+
+/** The skipped-work line for a package with no integration manifest. */
+export const NO_MANIFEST_SKIP =
+  'No astryx.integration.* found next to package.json, so nothing was checked.';
+
+/**
+ * The code a conflict carries when `--strict` reports it: conflicts have no
+ * code of their own.
+ */
+export const CONFLICT_CODES = /** @type {const} */ ({
+  components: 'component_name_conflict',
+  templates: 'template_id_conflict',
+});
+
+/** The code a check with no integration manifest carries under `--strict`. */
+export const NO_MANIFEST_CODE = 'missing_manifest';
+
+/**
+ * The code a skipped comparison carries under `--strict`: its key in the
+ * check's result, in snake case, then `_skipped` (`propDrift` is
+ * `prop_drift_skipped`).
+ * @param {string} key
+ */
+export function skippedCode(key) {
+  return `${key.replace(/([a-z0-9])([A-Z])/g, '$1_$2').toLowerCase()}_skipped`;
+}
+
+/** Each check's envelope type, by check. */
+const CHECK_OF_TYPE = /** @type {const} */ ({
+  'integration.validate': 'validate',
+  'integration.component-conflicts': 'components',
+  'integration.template-conflicts': 'templates',
+  'integration.doc-conflicts': 'docs',
+});
+
+/**
+ * Whether a value is a report a check carries beside its issues: a
+ * comparison with a `status` of `checked` or `skipped` and its `findings`.
+ * @param {unknown} value
+ * @returns {value is IntegrationCheckReport}
+ */
+export function isCheckReport(value) {
+  if (value == null || typeof value !== 'object' || Array.isArray(value)) {
+    return false;
+  }
+  const report = /** @type {{status?: unknown, findings?: unknown}} */ (value);
+  return (
+    (report.status === 'checked' || report.status === 'skipped') &&
+    Array.isArray(report.findings)
+  );
+}
+
+/**
+ * One finding as an issue: its own code, message, fix, file, and line where
+ * it has them.
+ * @param {any} finding
+ * @param {string} code
+ * @returns {Omit<IntegrationCheckFailure, 'check' | 'severity'>}
+ */
+function asIssue(finding, code) {
+  const file = finding.file ?? finding.doc ?? finding.source;
+  return {
+    code,
+    message: String(finding.message ?? ''),
+    ...(typeof finding.component === 'string'
+      ? {component: finding.component}
+      : {}),
+    ...(typeof finding.prop === 'string' ? {prop: finding.prop} : {}),
+    ...(typeof finding.fix === 'string' ? {fix: finding.fix} : {}),
+    ...(typeof file === 'string' ? {file} : {}),
+    ...(typeof finding.line === 'number' ? {line: finding.line} : {}),
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Every warning in one check's result, and every piece of work it skipped,
+ * as issues: what `--strict` reports as errors. The counts come from the
+ * same list, so the default run and the strict run read the same data.
+ * @param {IntegrationCheckName} check
+ * @param {IntegrationCheckResponse} response
+ * @param {{noPackage?: boolean}} [context] `noPackage`: validate found no
+ *   package.json, which only it reports; then no other check names a
+ *   missing manifest as skipped work
+ * @returns {{warnings: Array<Omit<IntegrationCheckFailure, 'check' | 'severity'>>, skipped: Array<Omit<IntegrationCheckFailure, 'check' | 'severity'>>}}
+ */
+export function strictIssues(check, response, context = {}) {
+  const data =
+    /** @type {Record<string, unknown> & IntegrationCheckResponse['data']} */ (
+      response.data
+    );
+  const warnings = [];
+  for (const issue of data.issues) {
+    if (issue.severity === 'warning') {
+      warnings.push(asIssue(issue, issue.code));
+    }
+  }
+  const conflictCode = /** @type {Record<string, string>} */ (CONFLICT_CODES)[
+    check
+  ];
+  for (const conflict of /** @type {any[]} */ (
+    Array.isArray(data.conflicts) ? data.conflicts : []
+  )) {
+    if (conflict.severity === 'warning' && conflictCode) {
+      warnings.push(asIssue(conflict, conflictCode));
+    }
+  }
+  for (const finding of /** @type {any[]} */ (
+    Array.isArray(data.findings) ? data.findings : []
+  )) {
+    if (finding.severity === 'warning') {
+      warnings.push(asIssue(finding, finding.code ?? finding.relationship));
+    }
+  }
+  const skipped = [];
+  const noPackage =
+    context.noPackage === true ||
+    data.issues.some(issue => issue.code === 'no_package');
+  if (!data.validated && !noPackage) {
+    skipped.push({code: NO_MANIFEST_CODE, message: NO_MANIFEST_SKIP});
+  }
+  for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(data)) {
+    if (!isCheckReport(value)) continue;
+    if (value.status === 'skipped') {
+      skipped.push({
+        code: skippedCode(key),
+        message: value.reason ?? `${key} did not run`,
+      });
+      continue;
+    }
+    for (const finding of /** @type {any[]} */ (value.findings)) {
+      if ((finding.severity ?? 'warning') !== 'warning') continue;
+      warnings.push(
+        asIssue(finding, finding.code ?? finding.problem ?? finding.kind),
+      );
+    }
+    // A comparison that ran but judged no prop type (a TypeScript older than
+    // the type comparison reads) skipped that work.
+    const typesSkipped = /** @type {{typesSkipped?: unknown}} */ (value)
+      .typesSkipped;
+    if (typeof typesSkipped === 'string') {
+      skipped.push({
+        code: 'prop_types_skipped',
+        message: `prop types not judged: ${typesSkipped}`,
+      });
+    }
+  }
+  return {warnings, skipped};
+}
+
+/**
+ * Count one check's result the way its own subcommand exits. Errors are what
+ * make it exit 1: error-severity issues, and for `docs` error findings.
+ * Warnings are warning issues, conflicts and findings, and the findings of
+ * any report the check carries. Skipped names work that did not run: no
+ * integration manifest, or a report that was skipped.
+ * @param {IntegrationCheckResponse} response
+ * @param {{noPackage?: boolean}} [context] as {@link strictIssues} takes it
+ * @returns {Omit<IntegrationCheckResult, 'check' | 'response'>}
+ */
+export function summarizeCheck(response, context = {}) {
+  const check = /** @type {IntegrationCheckName} */ (
+    CHECK_OF_TYPE[response.type]
+  );
+  let errors = summarizeIssues(response.data.issues).errors;
+  // The docs check is the one whose findings fail it.
+  if (response.type === 'integration.doc-conflicts') {
+    errors += response.data.findings.filter(
+      finding => finding.severity === 'error',
+    ).length;
+  }
+  const {warnings, skipped} = strictIssues(check, response, context);
+  return {
+    errors,
+    warnings: warnings.length,
+    skipped: skipped.map(each => each.message),
+    failed: errors > 0,
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Run every `doctor integration` check against the integration package in
+ * `cwd`, as its own build does, and return the `integration.check` envelope.
+ *
+ * @param {IntegrationCheckOptions} [options]
+ * @returns {Promise<IntegrationCheckCommandResponse>}
+ */
+export async function integrationCheck(options = {}) {
+  const {cwd = process.cwd(), strict = false} = options;
+  // One after another: each loads the package through the same discovery.
+  /** @type {IntegrationCheckResponse[]} */
+  const responses = [];
+  responses.push(await validateIntegration(undefined, {cwd}));
+  responses.push(await integrationComponentConflicts(undefined, {cwd}));
+  responses.push(await integrationTemplateConflicts(undefined, {cwd}));
+  responses.push(await integrationDocConflicts(undefined, {cwd}));
+
+  const [validation] = responses;
+  return {
+    type: 'integration.check',
+    data: {
+      validated: validation.data.validated,
+      name: validation.data.name,
+      version: validation.data.version,
+      strict,
+      ...combineChecks(responses, strict),
+    },
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Count the four checks' results into one summary. Each check's own row
+ * counts as its subcommand exits; the totals and `failures` count validate's
+ * issues once, though the other checks repeat them, and every other finding
+ * on its own, so two findings with one message stay two.
+ * @param {IntegrationCheckResponse[]} responses validate first
+ * @param {boolean} strict
+ */
+export function combineChecks(responses, strict) {
+  const [validation] = responses;
+  // Only validate reports a missing package.json; the other checks read it
+  // from there instead of each naming a missing manifest.
+  const noPackage = validation.data.issues.some(
+    issue => issue.code === 'no_package',
+  );
+  /** @type {IntegrationCheckResult[]} */
+  const checks = responses.map(response => ({
+    check: /** @type {IntegrationCheckName} */ (CHECK_OF_TYPE[response.type]),
+    ...summarizeCheck(response, {noPackage}),
+    response,
+  }));
+  // Later checks repeat validate's issues and its missing manifest: each
+  // match is consumed once per check, as from a multiset. Every other issue
+  // counts, even a repeat within one check.
+  const keyOf = (/** @type {string} */ kind, /** @type {object} */ issue) =>
+    `${kind}\0${JSON.stringify(issue)}`;
+  const validateFound = strictIssues('validate', validation, {noPackage});
+  /** @type {Map<string, number>} */
+  const fromValidate = new Map();
+  for (const key of [
+    ...validation.data.issues
+      .filter(issue => issue.severity === 'error')
+      .map(issue => keyOf('error', asIssue(issue, issue.code))),
+    ...validateFound.warnings.map(issue => keyOf('warning', issue)),
+    ...validateFound.skipped.map(issue => keyOf('skipped', issue)),
+  ]) {
+    fromValidate.set(key, (fromValidate.get(key) ?? 0) + 1);
+  }
+
+  let errors = 0;
+  let warnings = 0;
+  let unchecked = 0;
+  /** @type {string[]} */
+  const skipped = [];
+  // `--strict` adds no check: it reports the same warnings and skipped work
+  // as errors, and they fail the run.
+  /** @type {IntegrationCheckFailure[]} */
+  const failures = [];
+  checks.forEach(({check, response}, index) => {
+    /** @type {Map<string, number>} */
+    const repeats = index === 0 ? new Map() : new Map(fromValidate);
+    const isRepeat = (/** @type {string} */ key) => {
+      const left = repeats.get(key) ?? 0;
+      if (left === 0) return false;
+      repeats.set(key, left - 1);
+      return true;
+    };
+    for (const issue of response.data.issues) {
+      if (
+        issue.severity === 'error' &&
+        !isRepeat(keyOf('error', asIssue(issue, issue.code)))
+      ) {
+        errors++;
+      }
+    }
+    if (response.type === 'integration.doc-conflicts') {
+      errors += response.data.findings.filter(
+        finding => finding.severity === 'error',
+      ).length;
+    }
+    for (const value of Object.values(response.data)) {
+      const list = /** @type {{unchecked?: unknown}} */ (value)?.unchecked;
+      if (isCheckReport(value) && Array.isArray(list)) unchecked += list.length;
+    }
+    const found =
+      index === 0 ? validateFound : strictIssues(check, response, {noPackage});
+    for (const issue of found.warnings) {
+      if (isRepeat(keyOf('warning', issue))) continue;
+      warnings++;
+      if (strict) failures.push({check, severity: 'error', ...issue});
+    }
+    for (const issue of found.skipped) {
+      if (isRepeat(keyOf('skipped', issue))) continue;
+      skipped.push(`${check}: ${issue.message}`);
+      if (strict) failures.push({check, severity: 'error', ...issue});
+    }
+  });
+  return {
+    checks,
+    errors,
+    warnings,
+    skipped,
+    unchecked,
+    failures,
+    failed: checks.some(check => check.failed) || failures.length > 0,
+  };
+}