@arvorco/relentless 0.1.6 → 0.1.7

package/.claude/commands/relentless.constitution.md

@@ -10,69 +10,56 @@ Load the constitution skill and create or update the project constitution at `re
 
 **Context:** $ARGUMENTS
 
-The constitution skill will:
-1. Ask about your project's coding philosophy and standards
-2. Generate a personalized constitution based on your answers
-3. Save to `relentless/constitution.md`
-4. Ensure consistency with project standards
-
-1. Load the existing constitution template at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`.
-   - Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
-   **IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
-
-2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
-   - If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
-   - Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
-   - For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
-   - `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
-     - MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
-     - MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
-     - PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
-   - If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
-
-3. Draft the updated constitution content:
-   - Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
-   - Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
-   - Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing non‑negotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
-   - Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
-
-4. Consistency propagation checklist (convert prior checklist into active validations):
-   - Read `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` and ensure any "Constitution Check" or rules align with updated principles.
-   - Read `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` for scope/requirements alignment—update if constitution adds/removes mandatory sections or constraints.
-   - Read `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` and ensure task categorization reflects new or removed principle-driven task types (e.g., observability, versioning, testing discipline).
-   - Read each command file in `.specify/templates/commands/*.md` (including this one) to verify no outdated references (agent-specific names like CLAUDE only) remain when generic guidance is required.
-   - Read any runtime guidance docs (e.g., `README.md`, `docs/quickstart.md`, or agent-specific guidance files if present). Update references to principles changed.
-
-5. Produce a Sync Impact Report (prepend as an HTML comment at top of the constitution file after update):
-   - Version change: old → new
-   - List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
-   - Added sections
-   - Removed sections
-   - Templates requiring updates (✅ updated / ⚠ pending) with file paths
-   - Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
-
-6. Validation before final output:
-   - No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
-   - Version line matches report.
-   - Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
-   - Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
-
-7. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
-
-8. Output a final summary to the user with:
-   - New version and bump rationale.
-   - Any files flagged for manual follow-up.
-   - Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
-
-Formatting & Style Requirements:
-
-- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
-- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
-- Keep a single blank line between sections.
-- Avoid trailing whitespace.
-
-If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
-
-If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
-
-Do not create a new template; always operate on the existing `.specify/memory/constitution.md` file.
+The constitution skill (`.claude/skills/constitution/SKILL.md`) will guide you through:
+
+## Process
+
+1. **Gather Information**: Ask about project philosophy and standards
+   - Project identity (name, languages, tech stack)
+   - Testing approach (TDD, coverage requirements)
+   - Code quality (linting, checks, reviews)
+   - Architecture principles (patterns, modularity)
+   - Version control (branches, commits, CI/CD)
+
+2. **Generate Constitution**: Create personalized governance document
+   - Load template from `.claude/skills/constitution/templates/constitution-template.md`
+   - Replace all placeholders with concrete values from user answers
+   - Ensure MUST/SHOULD rules are clear and testable
+   - Set version 1.0.0 for new, increment semantically for updates
+   - Add ratification date and governance procedures
+
+3. **Validate**: Check completeness
+   - No placeholder tokens remain
+   - All dates in ISO format (YYYY-MM-DD)
+   - Principles are declarative and testable
+   - Version follows semver (X.Y.Z)
+
+4. **Save**: Write to `relentless/constitution.md`
+
+5. **Report**: Summarize what was created
+   - Version number
+   - Number of principles defined
+   - Key MUST/SHOULD rules
+   - Next steps: "Now create your first feature with `/relentless.specify`"
+
+## Updating Existing Constitution
+
+If `relentless/constitution.md` exists:
+1. Load current version
+2. Ask what needs to change
+3. Increment version appropriately:
+   - **MAJOR**: Breaking changes to principles
+   - **MINOR**: New principles added
+   - **PATCH**: Clarifications, typo fixes
+4. Update LAST_AMENDED_DATE to today
+5. Add amendment notes
+
+## Key Points
+
+- Constitution saved to `relentless/constitution.md` (project root level)
+- Foundation for all feature work - reference during specification and planning
+- Source of truth for project standards and governance
+- MUST rules are enforced, SHOULD rules are best practices
+- Follow the constitution skill's step-by-step process exactly
+
+**After establishing your constitution, create your first feature with `/relentless.specify`**

package/.claude/commands/relentless.specify.md

@@ -14,241 +14,53 @@ Load the specify skill and create a feature specification in `relentless/feature
 
 **Feature Description:** $ARGUMENTS
 
-The specify skill will:
-1. Create numbered feature directory and branch
-2. Generate structured specification from your description
-3. Validate specification quality
-4. Save to `spec.md`
-
-1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the branch:
-   - Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
-   - Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
-   - Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
-   - Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
-   - Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
-   - Examples:
-     - "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
-     - "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
-     - "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
-     - "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
-
-2. **Check for existing branches before creating new one**:
-
-   a. First, fetch all remote branches to ensure we have the latest information:
-
-      ```bash
-      git fetch --all --prune
-      ```
-
-   b. Find the highest feature number across all sources for the short-name:
-      - Remote branches: `git ls-remote --heads origin | grep -E 'refs/heads/[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
-      - Local branches: `git branch | grep -E '^[* ]*[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
-      - Specs directories: Check for directories matching `specs/[0-9]+-<short-name>`
-
-   c. Determine the next available number:
-      - Extract all numbers from all three sources
-      - Find the highest number N
-      - Use N+1 for the new branch number
-
-   d. Run the script `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS"` with the calculated number and short-name:
-      - Pass `--number N+1` and `--short-name "your-short-name"` along with the feature description
-      - Bash example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" --json --number 5 --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
-      - PowerShell example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -Number 5 -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
-
-   **IMPORTANT**:
-   - Check all three sources (remote branches, local branches, specs directories) to find the highest number
-   - Only match branches/directories with the exact short-name pattern
-   - If no existing branches/directories found with this short-name, start with number 1
-   - You must only ever run this script once per feature
-   - The JSON is provided in the terminal as output - always refer to it to get the actual content you're looking for
-   - The JSON output will contain BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE paths
-   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot")
-
-3. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
-
-4. Follow this execution flow:
-
-    1. Parse user description from Input
-       If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
-    2. Extract key concepts from description
-       Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
-    3. For unclear aspects:
-       - Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
-       - Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
-         - The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
-         - Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
-         - No reasonable default exists
-       - **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
-       - Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
-    4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
-       If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
-    5. Generate Functional Requirements
-       Each requirement must be testable
-       Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
-    6. Define Success Criteria
-       Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
-       Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
-       Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
-    7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
-    8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
-
-5. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
-
-6. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
-
-   a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
-
-      ```markdown
-      # Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
-      
-      **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
-      **Created**: [DATE]
-      **Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
-      
-      ## Content Quality
-      
-      - [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
-      - [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
-      - [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
-      - [ ] All mandatory sections completed
-      
-      ## Requirement Completeness
-      
-      - [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
-      - [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
-      - [ ] Success criteria are measurable
-      - [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
-      - [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
-      - [ ] Edge cases are identified
-      - [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
-      - [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
-      
-      ## Feature Readiness
-      
-      - [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
-      - [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
-      - [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
-      - [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
-      
-      ## Notes
-      
-      - Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/relentless.clarify` or `/relentless.plan`
-      ```
-
-   b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
-      - For each item, determine if it passes or fails
-      - Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
-
-   c. **Handle Validation Results**:
-
-      - **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 6
-
-      - **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
-        1. List the failing items and specific issues
-        2. Update the spec to address each issue
-        3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
-        4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
-
-      - **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
-        1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
-        2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
-        3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
-
-           ```markdown
-           ## Question [N]: [Topic]
-           
-           **Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
-           
-           **What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
-           
-           **Suggested Answers**:
-           
-           | Option | Answer | Implications |
-           |--------|--------|--------------|
-           | A      | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
-           | B      | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
-           | C      | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
-           | Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
-           
-           **Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
-           ```
-
-        4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
-           - Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
-           - Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
-           - Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
-           - Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
-        5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
-        6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
-        7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
-        8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
-        9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
-
-   d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
-
-7. Report completion with branch name, spec file path, checklist results, and readiness for the next phase (`/relentless.clarify` or `/relentless.plan`).
-
-**NOTE:** The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
-
-## General Guidelines
-
-## Quick Guidelines
-
-- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
-- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
-- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
-- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
-
-### Section Requirements
-
-- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
-- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
-- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
-
-### For AI Generation
-
-When creating this spec from a user prompt:
-
-1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
-2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
-3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
-   - Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
-   - Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
-   - Lack any reasonable default
-4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
-5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
-6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
-   - Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
-   - User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
-   - Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
-
-**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
-
-- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
-- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
-- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
-- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
-- Integration patterns: RESTful APIs unless specified otherwise
-
-### Success Criteria Guidelines
-
-Success criteria must be:
-
-1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
-2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
-3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
-4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
-
-**Good examples**:
-
-- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
-- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
-- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
-- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
-
-**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
-
-- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
-- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
-- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
-- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)
+The specify skill (`.claude/skills/specify/SKILL.md`) will guide you through:
+
+## Process
+
+1. **Create Feature Structure**
+   - Generate short name (2-4 words) from description
+   - Check existing branches to find next number
+   - Run `.claude/skills/specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "FEATURE_DESCRIPTION"`
+   - Parse JSON output for BRANCH_NAME, SPEC_FILE, FEATURE_DIR
+
+2. **Load Context**
+   - Read `relentless/constitution.md` for governance rules
+   - Note MUST/SHOULD requirements for specifications
+   - Load spec template from `.claude/skills/specify/templates/spec-template.md`
+
+3. **Generate Specification**
+   - Extract key concepts: actors, actions, data, constraints
+   - Make informed assumptions (document in Assumptions section)
+   - Limit [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers to max 3 critical items
+   - Write complete spec to SPEC_FILE
+
+4. **Validate Quality**
+   - All sections completed with concrete details
+   - User scenarios are clear and testable
+   - Functional requirements are measurable
+   - Success criteria are defined
+   - Assumptions documented
+
+5. **Report Completion**
+   - Feature number and name
+   - Branch created
+   - Spec file location
+   - Next steps: `/relentless.plan` or `/relentless.clarify`
+
+## Key Points
+
+- **Branch naming**: `NNN-feature-name` (e.g., `003-user-auth`)
+- **Directory structure**: `relentless/features/NNN-feature-name/`
+- **Spec file**: `relentless/features/NNN-feature-name/spec.md`
+- **Auto-numbering**: Script checks existing branches and uses next available number
+- **Quality focus**: Make reasonable assumptions, minimize clarifications
+- **Constitution compliance**: Follow project governance rules
+
+## After Specification
+
+- Run `/relentless.clarify` if ambiguities need resolving
+- Run `/relentless.plan` to create technical implementation plan
+- Run `/relentless.tasks` to generate user stories and tasks
+
+**Follow the specify skill's step-by-step process exactly.**

package/README.md

@@ -71,9 +71,9 @@ relentless run --feature 001-user-auth --tui
 
 See [Supported Agents](#supported-agents) section for detailed workflows per agent.
 
-### Legacy PRD Workflow (Still Supported)
+### Ralph Wiggum Method (Classic Workflow)
 
-You can still use the original workflow with direct PRD creation:
+You can still use the original Ralph Wiggum workflow with direct PRD creation:
 
 ```bash
 # 1. Install and initialize

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@arvorco/relentless",
-  "version": "0.1.6",
+  "version": "0.1.7",
   "description": "Universal AI agent orchestrator - works with Claude Code, Amp, OpenCode, Codex, Droid, and Gemini",
   "type": "module",
   "publishConfig": {