@arvorco/relentless 0.1.0

package/.claude/commands/relentless.analyze.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+---
+description: Analyze consistency across spec, plan, tasks, and checklist.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Start Implementation
+    agent: relentless.implement
+    prompt: Begin implementation workflow
+    send: true
+---
+
+Load the analyze skill and validate cross-artifact consistency.
+
+**Context:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The analyze skill will:
+1. Read all feature artifacts (spec, plan, tasks, checklist, constitution)
+2. Check for consistency issues and missing coverage
+3. Validate against constitution MUST rules
+4. Report CRITICAL, WARNING, and INFO issues
+
+Run this before starting implementation to catch issues early.

package/.claude/commands/relentless.checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: Generate quality validation checklist from feature artifacts.
+---
+
+Load the checklist skill and generate quality validation checklist.
+
+**Context:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The checklist skill will:
+1. Read spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and constitution.md
+2. Generate domain-specific validation items
+3. Reference user stories and identify gaps
+4. Save to `relentless/features/NNN-feature/checklist.md`
+
+**Important:** Checklist items will be merged into prd.json acceptance criteria!

package/.claude/commands/relentless.clarify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+description: Identify and resolve ambiguities in feature specifications.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Build Technical Plan
+    agent: relentless.plan
+    prompt: Create technical plan with clarifications
+---
+
+Load the clarify skill and resolve specification ambiguities.
+
+**Context:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The clarify skill will:
+1. Scan spec.md for 9 types of ambiguities
+2. Present clarification questions (max 5)
+3. Update spec with answers
+4. Save clarification log
+
+Use this after creating spec if requirements are unclear.

package/.claude/commands/relentless.constitution.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+---
+description: Create or update the project constitution - personalized governance and coding principles.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Build Specification
+    agent: relentless.specify
+    prompt: Create a feature specification. I want to build...
+---
+
+Load the constitution skill and create or update the project constitution at `relentless/constitution.md`.
+
+**Context:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The constitution skill will:
+1. Ask about your project's coding philosophy and standards
+2. Generate a personalized constitution based on your answers
+3. Save to `relentless/constitution.md`
+4. Ensure consistency with project standards
+
+1. Load the existing constitution template at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`.
+   - Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
+   **IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
+
+2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
+   - If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
+   - Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
+   - For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
+   - `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
+     - MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
+     - MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
+     - PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
+   - If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
+
+3. Draft the updated constitution content:
+   - Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
+   - Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
+   - Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing non‑negotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
+   - Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
+
+4. Consistency propagation checklist (convert prior checklist into active validations):
+   - Read `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` and ensure any "Constitution Check" or rules align with updated principles.
+   - Read `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` for scope/requirements alignment—update if constitution adds/removes mandatory sections or constraints.
+   - Read `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` and ensure task categorization reflects new or removed principle-driven task types (e.g., observability, versioning, testing discipline).
+   - Read each command file in `.specify/templates/commands/*.md` (including this one) to verify no outdated references (agent-specific names like CLAUDE only) remain when generic guidance is required.
+   - Read any runtime guidance docs (e.g., `README.md`, `docs/quickstart.md`, or agent-specific guidance files if present). Update references to principles changed.
+
+5. Produce a Sync Impact Report (prepend as an HTML comment at top of the constitution file after update):
+   - Version change: old → new
+   - List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
+   - Added sections
+   - Removed sections
+   - Templates requiring updates (✅ updated / ⚠ pending) with file paths
+   - Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
+
+6. Validation before final output:
+   - No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
+   - Version line matches report.
+   - Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
+   - Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
+
+7. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
+
+8. Output a final summary to the user with:
+   - New version and bump rationale.
+   - Any files flagged for manual follow-up.
+   - Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
+
+Formatting & Style Requirements:
+
+- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
+- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
+- Keep a single blank line between sections.
+- Avoid trailing whitespace.
+
+If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
+
+If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
+
+Do not create a new template; always operate on the existing `.specify/memory/constitution.md` file.

package/.claude/commands/relentless.implement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: Execute implementation workflow phase by phase.
+---
+
+Load the implement skill and begin systematic implementation.
+
+**Context:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The implement skill will:
+1. Guide you through implementing tasks in dependency order
+2. Track progress per user story
+3. Ensure quality gates are met
+4. Update progress.txt with learnings
+
+Prerequisites: /relentless.analyze must pass (no CRITICAL issues)

package/.claude/commands/relentless.plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+---
+description: Generate technical implementation plan from feature specification.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Generate Task Breakdown
+    agent: relentless.tasks
+    prompt: Generate tasks from plan
+    send: true
+  - label: Generate Quality Checklist
+    agent: relentless.checklist
+    prompt: Generate quality checklist
+    send: true
+---
+
+Load the plan skill and create technical implementation plan.
+
+**Context:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The plan skill will:
+1. Read feature specification and constitution
+2. Generate technical architecture and design
+3. Define data models, APIs, and implementation strategy
+4. Save to `relentless/features/NNN-feature/plan.md`

package/.claude/commands/relentless.plan.old.md

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+---
+description: Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Create Tasks
+    agent: relentless.tasks
+    prompt: Break the plan into tasks
+    send: true
+  - label: Create Checklist
+    agent: relentless.checklist
+    prompt: Create a checklist for the following domain...
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Outline
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Load context**: Read FEATURE_SPEC and `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).
+
+3. **Execute plan workflow**: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
+   - Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
+   - Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
+   - Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
+   - Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
+   - Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
+   - Phase 1: Update agent context by running the agent script
+   - Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design
+
+4. **Stop and report**: Command ends after Phase 2 planning. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.
+
+## Phases
+
+### Phase 0: Outline & Research
+
+1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above:
+   - For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
+   - For each dependency → best practices task
+   - For each integration → patterns task
+
+2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**:
+
+   ```text
+   For each unknown in Technical Context:
+     Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
+   For each technology choice:
+     Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
+   ```
+
+3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format:
+   - Decision: [what was chosen]
+   - Rationale: [why chosen]
+   - Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
+
+**Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
+
+### Phase 1: Design & Contracts
+
+**Prerequisites:** `research.md` complete
+
+1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
+   - Entity name, fields, relationships
+   - Validation rules from requirements
+   - State transitions if applicable
+
+2. **Generate API contracts** from functional requirements:
+   - For each user action → endpoint
+   - Use standard REST/GraphQL patterns
+   - Output OpenAPI/GraphQL schema to `/contracts/`
+
+3. **Agent context update**:
+   - Run `.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh claude`
+   - These scripts detect which AI agent is in use
+   - Update the appropriate agent-specific context file
+   - Add only new technology from current plan
+   - Preserve manual additions between markers
+
+**Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, agent-specific file
+
+## Key rules
+
+- Use absolute paths
+- ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications

package/.claude/commands/relentless.specify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@
+---
+description: Create feature specification from natural language description.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Build Technical Plan
+    agent: relentless.plan
+    prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
+  - label: Clarify Requirements
+    agent: relentless.clarify
+    prompt: Clarify specification requirements
+    send: true
+---
+
+Load the specify skill and create a feature specification in `relentless/features/NNN-feature-name/`.
+
+**Feature Description:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The specify skill will:
+1. Create numbered feature directory and branch
+2. Generate structured specification from your description
+3. Validate specification quality
+4. Save to `spec.md`
+
+1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the branch:
+   - Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
+   - Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
+   - Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
+   - Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
+   - Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
+   - Examples:
+     - "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
+     - "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
+     - "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
+     - "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
+
+2. **Check for existing branches before creating new one**:
+
+   a. First, fetch all remote branches to ensure we have the latest information:
+
+      ```bash
+      git fetch --all --prune
+      ```
+
+   b. Find the highest feature number across all sources for the short-name:
+      - Remote branches: `git ls-remote --heads origin | grep -E 'refs/heads/[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
+      - Local branches: `git branch | grep -E '^[* ]*[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
+      - Specs directories: Check for directories matching `specs/[0-9]+-<short-name>`
+
+   c. Determine the next available number:
+      - Extract all numbers from all three sources
+      - Find the highest number N
+      - Use N+1 for the new branch number
+
+   d. Run the script `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS"` with the calculated number and short-name:
+      - Pass `--number N+1` and `--short-name "your-short-name"` along with the feature description
+      - Bash example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" --json --number 5 --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
+      - PowerShell example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -Number 5 -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
+
+   **IMPORTANT**:
+   - Check all three sources (remote branches, local branches, specs directories) to find the highest number
+   - Only match branches/directories with the exact short-name pattern
+   - If no existing branches/directories found with this short-name, start with number 1
+   - You must only ever run this script once per feature
+   - The JSON is provided in the terminal as output - always refer to it to get the actual content you're looking for
+   - The JSON output will contain BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE paths
+   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot")
+
+3. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
+
+4. Follow this execution flow:
+
+    1. Parse user description from Input
+       If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
+    2. Extract key concepts from description
+       Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
+    3. For unclear aspects:
+       - Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
+       - Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
+         - The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
+         - Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
+         - No reasonable default exists
+       - **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
+       - Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+    4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
+       If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
+    5. Generate Functional Requirements
+       Each requirement must be testable
+       Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
+    6. Define Success Criteria
+       Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
+       Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
+       Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
+    7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
+    8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
+
+5. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
+
+6. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
+
+   a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
+
+      ```markdown
+      # Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
+      
+      **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
+      **Created**: [DATE]
+      **Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
+      
+      ## Content Quality
+      
+      - [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+      - [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
+      - [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+      - [ ] All mandatory sections completed
+      
+      ## Requirement Completeness
+      
+      - [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+      - [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+      - [ ] Success criteria are measurable
+      - [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+      - [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+      - [ ] Edge cases are identified
+      - [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
+      - [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+      
+      ## Feature Readiness
+      
+      - [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+      - [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
+      - [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+      - [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
+      
+      ## Notes
+      
+      - Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/relentless.clarify` or `/relentless.plan`
+      ```
+
+   b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
+      - For each item, determine if it passes or fails
+      - Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
+
+   c. **Handle Validation Results**:
+
+      - **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 6
+
+      - **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
+        1. List the failing items and specific issues
+        2. Update the spec to address each issue
+        3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
+        4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
+
+      - **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
+        1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
+        2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
+        3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
+
+           ```markdown
+           ## Question [N]: [Topic]
+           
+           **Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
+           
+           **What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
+           
+           **Suggested Answers**:
+           
+           | Option | Answer | Implications |
+           |--------|--------|--------------|
+           | A      | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | B      | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | C      | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
+           
+           **Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
+           ```
+
+        4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
+           - Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
+           - Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
+           - Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
+           - Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
+        5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
+        6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
+        7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
+        8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
+        9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
+
+   d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
+
+7. Report completion with branch name, spec file path, checklist results, and readiness for the next phase (`/relentless.clarify` or `/relentless.plan`).
+
+**NOTE:** The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
+
+## General Guidelines
+
+## Quick Guidelines
+
+- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
+- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
+- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
+- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
+
+### Section Requirements
+
+- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
+- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
+- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
+
+### For AI Generation
+
+When creating this spec from a user prompt:
+
+1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
+2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
+3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
+   - Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
+   - Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
+   - Lack any reasonable default
+4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
+6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
+   - Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
+   - User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
+   - Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
+
+**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
+
+- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
+- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
+- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
+- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
+- Integration patterns: RESTful APIs unless specified otherwise
+
+### Success Criteria Guidelines
+
+Success criteria must be:
+
+1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
+2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
+3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
+4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
+
+**Good examples**:
+
+- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
+- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
+- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
+- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
+
+**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
+
+- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
+- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
+- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
+- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)

package/.claude/commands/relentless.tasks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+---
+description: Generate dependency-ordered user stories and tasks from plan.
+handoffs: 
+  - label: Analyze Consistency
+    agent: relentless.analyze
+    prompt: Analyze cross-artifact consistency
+    send: true
+  - label: Start Implementation
+    agent: relentless.implement
+    prompt: Begin implementation
+    send: true
+---
+
+Load the tasks skill and generate user stories and implementation tasks.
+
+**Context:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The tasks skill will:
+1. Read spec.md and plan.md
+2. Extract user stories from requirements
+3. Break down into actionable tasks with acceptance criteria
+4. Order by dependencies
+5. Save to `relentless/features/NNN-feature/tasks.md`
+
+**Important:** tasks.md contains the user stories that will be converted to prd.json!

package/.claude/commands/relentless.taskstoissues.md

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: Convert user stories to GitHub issues.
+---
+
+Load the taskstoissues skill and create GitHub issues from user stories.
+
+**Context:** $ARGUMENTS
+
+The taskstoissues skill will:
+1. Read tasks.md
+2. Parse user stories
+3. Generate GitHub issues with `gh` CLI
+4. Link dependencies
+
+Note: The actual implementation uses the CLI command `relentless issues --feature <name>`

package/.claude/settings.local.json

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+{
+  "permissions": {
+    "allow": [
+      "WebSearch",
+      "Bash(amp --help:*)",
+      "Bash(opencode --help:*)",
+      "Bash(codex:*)",
+      "Bash(droid:*)",
+      "Bash(gemini:*)",
+      "Bash(node --version:*)",
+      "Bash(bun --version)",
+      "Bash(opencode agent:*)",
+      "Bash(tree:*)",
+      "Bash(jq:*)",
+      "Bash(bun run lint:*)",
+      "Bash(bun run typecheck:*)",
+      "Bash(bun build:*)",
+      "Bash(bun run:*)",
+      "Bash(git diff:*)",
+      "Bash(git add:*)"
+    ]
+  }
+}