@artale/pi-pai 4.3.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.github/workflows/ci.yml +51 -0
- package/AGENTS.md.pai +32 -0
- package/LICENSE +21 -0
- package/README.md +139 -0
- package/SYSTEM.md.pai +120 -0
- package/damage-control-rules.yaml +611 -0
- package/models.json.pai +43 -0
- package/package.json +65 -0
- package/skills/agents/SKILL.md +36 -0
- package/skills/content-analysis/SKILL.md +44 -0
- package/skills/investigation/SKILL.md +25 -0
- package/skills/media/SKILL.md +28 -0
- package/skills/research/SKILL.md +51 -0
- package/skills/scraping/SKILL.md +24 -0
- package/skills/security/SKILL.md +49 -0
- package/skills/telos/SKILL.md +37 -0
- package/skills/thinking/SKILL.md +52 -0
- package/src/extension.ts +1136 -0
- package/templates.json +68 -0
- package/tsconfig.json +18 -0
package/package.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"name": "@artale/pi-pai",
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "4.3.0",
|
|
4
|
+
"description": "Personal AI Infrastructure for Pi \u2014 synced with PAI v1.0.0 + Daniel Miesslers framework + 9 skill categories",
|
|
5
|
+
"type": "module",
|
|
6
|
+
"main": "src/extension.ts",
|
|
7
|
+
"pi": {
|
|
8
|
+
"extensions": [
|
|
9
|
+
"src/extension.ts"
|
|
10
|
+
],
|
|
11
|
+
"commands": [
|
|
12
|
+
"status"
|
|
13
|
+
],
|
|
14
|
+
"tools": [
|
|
15
|
+
"pai_status",
|
|
16
|
+
"pai_learn",
|
|
17
|
+
"pai_rate"
|
|
18
|
+
],
|
|
19
|
+
"skills": [
|
|
20
|
+
"agents",
|
|
21
|
+
"content-analysis",
|
|
22
|
+
"investigation",
|
|
23
|
+
"media",
|
|
24
|
+
"research",
|
|
25
|
+
"scraping",
|
|
26
|
+
"security",
|
|
27
|
+
"telos",
|
|
28
|
+
"thinking"
|
|
29
|
+
]
|
|
30
|
+
},
|
|
31
|
+
"scripts": {
|
|
32
|
+
"build": "tsc",
|
|
33
|
+
"test": "pi -e src/extension.ts -p \"say hello and list your /commands and tools\"",
|
|
34
|
+
"test:old": "echo \"Legacy tests\""
|
|
35
|
+
},
|
|
36
|
+
"keywords": [
|
|
37
|
+
"pi-package",
|
|
38
|
+
"pi-extension",
|
|
39
|
+
"pai",
|
|
40
|
+
"personal-ai-infrastructure",
|
|
41
|
+
"telos",
|
|
42
|
+
"ralph-wiggum",
|
|
43
|
+
"damage-control",
|
|
44
|
+
"goal-tracking",
|
|
45
|
+
"learning-loop",
|
|
46
|
+
"scientific-method"
|
|
47
|
+
],
|
|
48
|
+
"author": "arosstale",
|
|
49
|
+
"license": "MIT",
|
|
50
|
+
"repository": {
|
|
51
|
+
"type": "git",
|
|
52
|
+
"url": "https://github.com/arosstale/pi-pai.git"
|
|
53
|
+
},
|
|
54
|
+
"devDependencies": {
|
|
55
|
+
"@types/js-yaml": "^4.0.9",
|
|
56
|
+
"@types/node": "^25.0.3",
|
|
57
|
+
"typescript": "^5.9.3"
|
|
58
|
+
},
|
|
59
|
+
"peerDependencies": {
|
|
60
|
+
"@mariozechner/pi-coding-agent": ">=0.50.0"
|
|
61
|
+
},
|
|
62
|
+
"dependencies": {
|
|
63
|
+
"js-yaml": "^4.1.1"
|
|
64
|
+
}
|
|
65
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: agents
|
|
3
|
+
description: Compose custom agents from base traits, voices, and specializations for specialized perspectives. Create agent teams for parallel work. USE WHEN create custom agents, spin up agents, specialized agents, agent personalities, available traits, compose agent, agent profile, spawn parallel agents, launch agents, agent teams, swarm.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Agents Skill
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Agent Composition
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Create specialized agents by combining:
|
|
14
|
+
1. **Base Trait** — Core expertise (Engineer, Researcher, Designer, etc.)
|
|
15
|
+
2. **Voice** — Communication style (Academic, Practitioner, Contrarian, etc.)
|
|
16
|
+
3. **Specialization** — Domain focus (Security, Frontend, Data, etc.)
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Available Base Traits
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- **Engineer** — Implementation-focused, TDD, clean code
|
|
21
|
+
- **Architect** — System design, trade-offs, scalability
|
|
22
|
+
- **Researcher** — Evidence-based, multi-source, thorough
|
|
23
|
+
- **Designer** — User-centered, accessible, beautiful
|
|
24
|
+
- **Analyst** — Data-driven, pattern recognition, synthesis
|
|
25
|
+
- **Strategist** — Long-term thinking, competitive analysis
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Team Coordination
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
For complex tasks, spawn multiple agents with:
|
|
30
|
+
- Shared context (the task description)
|
|
31
|
+
- Independent execution
|
|
32
|
+
- Results synthesis at the end
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Usage
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
Describe the kind of agent(s) you need and the task. Agents will be composed and deployed.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: content-analysis
|
|
3
|
+
description: Content extraction and analysis for video, podcast, article, and YouTube content. Extracts structured insights, key takeaways, and wisdom. USE WHEN extract wisdom, content analysis, analyze content, insight report, analyze video, analyze podcast, extract insights, key takeaways, what did I miss, extract from YouTube.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Content Analysis Skill
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Extraction Framework
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
For any content (article, video, podcast, document):
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
1. **Summary** — 25-50 word overview
|
|
16
|
+
2. **Key Ideas** — 5-15 most important ideas
|
|
17
|
+
3. **Insights** — Non-obvious observations
|
|
18
|
+
4. **Quotes** — Notable direct quotes
|
|
19
|
+
5. **Habits** — Actionable habits mentioned
|
|
20
|
+
6. **Facts** — Surprising or important facts
|
|
21
|
+
7. **Recommendations** — Books, tools, resources mentioned
|
|
22
|
+
8. **Action Items** — What to do with this knowledge
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Output Format
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
```
|
|
27
|
+
## Content Analysis: [Title]
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### One-Sentence Summary
|
|
30
|
+
[25-50 words]
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### Key Ideas (ranked by importance)
|
|
33
|
+
1. [Idea]
|
|
34
|
+
2. [Idea]
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
### Insights
|
|
37
|
+
- [Non-obvious observation]
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### Notable Quotes
|
|
40
|
+
> "Quote" — Speaker
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
### Action Items
|
|
43
|
+
- [ ] [Actionable takeaway]
|
|
44
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: investigation
|
|
3
|
+
description: OSINT and investigation including people search, company intel, domain lookup, social media discovery, and threat intel. USE WHEN OSINT, due diligence, company intel, background check, find person, people search, domain lookup, entity lookup, threat intel, who is.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Investigation Skill
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Capabilities
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
- People search and public records
|
|
14
|
+
- Company intelligence and filings
|
|
15
|
+
- Domain and infrastructure lookup
|
|
16
|
+
- Social media discovery
|
|
17
|
+
- Threat intelligence correlation
|
|
18
|
+
- Entity relationship mapping
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Methods
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
1. **Surface scan** — Quick public data aggregation
|
|
23
|
+
2. **Deep dive** — Cross-referencing multiple data sources
|
|
24
|
+
3. **Pattern analysis** — Identifying connections and anomalies
|
|
25
|
+
4. **Timeline reconstruction** — Building event chronology
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: media
|
|
3
|
+
description: Visual and video content creation. AI images, technical diagrams, mermaid flowcharts, infographics, comics, and special effects. USE WHEN art, diagrams, mermaid, flowcharts, infographics, video, animation, thumbnails, visualizations, generate image, technical diagrams.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Media Skill
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Capabilities
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### Diagrams & Charts
|
|
14
|
+
- Mermaid flowcharts, sequence diagrams, class diagrams
|
|
15
|
+
- Technical architecture diagrams
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
### AI Image Generation
|
|
18
|
+
- Prompt engineering for image models
|
|
19
|
+
- Style guidance and iteration
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### Infographics
|
|
22
|
+
- Data visualization
|
|
23
|
+
- Comparison frameworks
|
|
24
|
+
- Timeline graphics
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Usage
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
Describe what you need visually. For diagrams, Mermaid is preferred. For complex visuals, provide the data and desired style.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: research
|
|
3
|
+
description: Comprehensive research and content extraction. Quick, standard, extensive, and deep modes with multi-source parallel investigation, content retrieval, and analysis. USE WHEN research, investigate, find information, analyze content, retrieve content, extract knowledge, web scraping, standard research, map landscape, competitive analysis, deep investigation.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Research Skill
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Modes
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
| Mode | Depth | Sources | Time |
|
|
14
|
+
|------|-------|---------|------|
|
|
15
|
+
| Quick | Surface scan | 2-3 sources | <1 min |
|
|
16
|
+
| Standard | Balanced coverage | 4-6 sources | 2-5 min |
|
|
17
|
+
| Extensive | Broad sweep | 8-12 sources | 5-10 min |
|
|
18
|
+
| Deep | Exhaustive | 15+ sources | 10-30 min |
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
1. **Decompose** the research question into 3-10 sub-queries
|
|
23
|
+
2. **Search** using web search across multiple angles
|
|
24
|
+
3. **Extract** key findings, data points, and insights
|
|
25
|
+
4. **Synthesize** into a structured report
|
|
26
|
+
5. **Verify** claims with cross-referencing
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Output Format
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
```
|
|
31
|
+
## Research: [Topic]
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### Key Findings
|
|
34
|
+
- [Finding 1 with source]
|
|
35
|
+
- [Finding 2 with source]
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### Analysis
|
|
38
|
+
[Synthesis of findings]
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### Sources
|
|
41
|
+
- [Source 1](url)
|
|
42
|
+
- [Source 2](url)
|
|
43
|
+
```
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
## Rules
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
- Always cite sources
|
|
48
|
+
- Flag conflicting information
|
|
49
|
+
- Distinguish facts from opinions
|
|
50
|
+
- Note confidence levels
|
|
51
|
+
- Prefer primary sources over secondary
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: scraping
|
|
3
|
+
description: Web scraping via progressive escalation and social media platform scrapers. USE WHEN scraping, crawl, scrape URL, bot detection, CAPTCHA, spider.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Scraping Skill
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Progressive Escalation
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
1. **Direct fetch** — curl/fetch with standard headers
|
|
14
|
+
2. **Browser rendering** — Headless browser for JS-heavy sites
|
|
15
|
+
3. **Proxy rotation** — For rate-limited or geo-restricted content
|
|
16
|
+
4. **Specialized APIs** — Platform-specific scrapers
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Rules
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- Respect robots.txt
|
|
21
|
+
- Rate limit requests
|
|
22
|
+
- Handle pagination
|
|
23
|
+
- Extract structured data
|
|
24
|
+
- Store raw + processed versions
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: security
|
|
3
|
+
description: Security assessment including reconnaissance, web assessment (OWASP), vulnerability analysis, threat modeling, and security news analysis. USE WHEN recon, reconnaissance, port scan, subdomain, DNS, WHOIS, web assessment, OWASP, pentest, vulnerability analysis, threat modeling, security trends, security research.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Security Skill
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Capabilities
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### Reconnaissance
|
|
14
|
+
- Subdomain enumeration
|
|
15
|
+
- DNS analysis
|
|
16
|
+
- WHOIS lookup
|
|
17
|
+
- Port scanning
|
|
18
|
+
- ASN mapping
|
|
19
|
+
- Technology fingerprinting
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### Web Assessment (OWASP)
|
|
22
|
+
- Authentication testing
|
|
23
|
+
- Authorization testing
|
|
24
|
+
- Input validation
|
|
25
|
+
- Session management
|
|
26
|
+
- Error handling
|
|
27
|
+
- Cryptography review
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### Threat Modeling
|
|
30
|
+
- STRIDE framework
|
|
31
|
+
- Attack surface mapping
|
|
32
|
+
- Risk assessment matrix
|
|
33
|
+
- Mitigation recommendations
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Tools
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Use these CLI tools when available:
|
|
38
|
+
- `nmap` — Port scanning
|
|
39
|
+
- `ffuf` — Web fuzzing
|
|
40
|
+
- `dig` / `whois` — DNS/WHOIS
|
|
41
|
+
- `curl` — HTTP testing
|
|
42
|
+
- `jq` — JSON parsing
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
## Rules
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
- Only perform authorized testing
|
|
47
|
+
- Document all findings with evidence
|
|
48
|
+
- Rate severity: Critical > High > Medium > Low > Info
|
|
49
|
+
- Provide remediation for each finding
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: telos
|
|
3
|
+
description: Life OS and project analysis. Goals, dependencies, beliefs, wisdom, books, movies, narrative points, project dashboards, and life direction analysis. USE WHEN Telos, life goals, projects, dependencies, beliefs, wisdom, books, movies, project analysis, dashboard.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Telos — Life Operating System
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Framework
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Telos is a structured system for tracking:
|
|
14
|
+
- **Mission** — Core life purpose
|
|
15
|
+
- **Goals** — Active objectives with timelines
|
|
16
|
+
- **Projects** — Active work mapped to goals
|
|
17
|
+
- **Dependencies** — What each goal requires
|
|
18
|
+
- **Beliefs** — Core beliefs that drive decisions
|
|
19
|
+
- **Wisdom** — Accumulated insights from experience
|
|
20
|
+
- **Books** — Reading list and key takeaways
|
|
21
|
+
- **Movies/Media** — Cultural consumption log
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Dashboard
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Generate a structured overview showing:
|
|
26
|
+
1. Active goals and their status
|
|
27
|
+
2. Projects and which goals they serve
|
|
28
|
+
3. Recent wisdom additions
|
|
29
|
+
4. Dependency blockers
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Reports
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
Structured reports with:
|
|
34
|
+
- Executive summary
|
|
35
|
+
- Key findings
|
|
36
|
+
- Recommendations
|
|
37
|
+
- Data exhibits
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: thinking
|
|
3
|
+
description: Analytical and creative thinking frameworks. First principles decomposition, iterative depth analysis, council debate with multiple perspectives, red team stress testing, brainstorming, world and threat models, and scientific method. USE WHEN first principles, decompose, challenge assumptions, iterative depth, be creative, brainstorm, council, debate, red team, stress test, devil's advocate, threat model, world model, think about, experiment, hypothesis, deep exploration, figure out, optimize, improve, weigh options, creative solutions, critique, counterarguments.
|
|
4
|
+
metadata:
|
|
5
|
+
author: pai
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Thinking Skill
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Available Frameworks
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### First Principles
|
|
14
|
+
Decompose problem to fundamental truths, then rebuild from ground up.
|
|
15
|
+
1. Identify assumptions
|
|
16
|
+
2. Break down to irreducible elements
|
|
17
|
+
3. Rebuild solution from fundamentals
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
### Council (Multi-perspective Debate)
|
|
20
|
+
3-round debate with 3-5 distinct perspectives:
|
|
21
|
+
- Round 1: Each perspective states position
|
|
22
|
+
- Round 2: Challenge and counter-argue
|
|
23
|
+
- Round 3: Synthesize and find consensus
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
### Red Team
|
|
26
|
+
Adversarial analysis:
|
|
27
|
+
1. Identify the plan/system to attack
|
|
28
|
+
2. Generate 5-10 attack vectors
|
|
29
|
+
3. Rate severity and likelihood
|
|
30
|
+
4. Propose mitigations
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### Iterative Depth
|
|
33
|
+
Explore topic from 2-8 angles, each adding depth:
|
|
34
|
+
1. Surface understanding
|
|
35
|
+
2. Mechanism understanding
|
|
36
|
+
3. Edge cases and failures
|
|
37
|
+
4. Systemic implications
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### Science Method
|
|
40
|
+
1. Observe the phenomenon
|
|
41
|
+
2. Form hypothesis
|
|
42
|
+
3. Design experiment
|
|
43
|
+
4. Execute and measure
|
|
44
|
+
5. Analyze results
|
|
45
|
+
6. Iterate
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### World/Threat Model
|
|
48
|
+
Analyze threats, opportunities, and second-order effects across multiple time horizons.
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
## Usage
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
Specify which framework to use, or describe the problem and the appropriate framework will be selected.
|