@arela/uploader 1.0.22 → 1.0.24

package/src/scoring/matchers-seed.js

@@ -0,0 +1,386 @@
+/**
+ * Seed matchers for the scoring engine (PROTOTYPE).
+ *
+ * Each entry re-expresses the boolean `match()` of an existing
+ * `src/document-types/*.js` definition as a set of weighted **clues**, while
+ * REUSING that definition's `extractors` / `resolveType` /
+ * `extractNumPedimento` / `extractPedimentoYear` verbatim. Only the SELECTION
+ * logic is new — field extraction is unchanged, so a comparison against
+ * `extractDocumentFields` isolates the first-match-wins → best-match change.
+ *
+ * Clue → flag mapping used throughout:
+ *   - strong positive signal   → high `weight`
+ *   - hard exclusion (return false in the original) → `negative: true`
+ *   - mandatory signature       → `required: true`
+ *   - `minScore` is tuned so the weighted sum reproduces the original boolean
+ *     on the existing test fixtures.
+ *
+ * NOTE: a few original conditions are compound (e.g. simplificado's
+ * "COVE: present AND PAGO absent", or inter-agencia's "≥2 distinct RFCs from a
+ * set"). Where a single clue cannot express the exact boolean, the closest
+ * faithful approximation is used and flagged inline — the comparison harness
+ * (`scripts/scoring-compare.js`) surfaces any divergence on a real corpus.
+ */
+import { dodaPdfDefinition } from '../document-types/doda-pdf.js';
+import { dodaXmlDefinition } from '../document-types/doda-xml.js';
+import {
+  INTER_AGENCIA_RFCS,
+  facturaInterAgenciaDefinition,
+} from '../document-types/factura-inter-agencia.js';
+import { facturasComerciales } from '../document-types/facturas-comerciales.js';
+import { pedimentoCompletoXmlDefinition } from '../document-types/pedimento-completo-xml.js';
+import { pedimentoCompletoDefinition } from '../document-types/pedimento-completo.js';
+import { pedimentoSimplificadoDefinition } from '../document-types/pedimento-simplificado.js';
+import { supportDocumentDefinition } from '../document-types/support-document.js';
+
+// Pull the extraction half of a definition (reused unchanged).
+function reuse(def) {
+  return {
+    extractors: def.extractors,
+    resolveType: def.resolveType,
+    extractNumPedimento: def.extractNumPedimento,
+    extractPedimentoYear: def.extractPedimentoYear,
+  };
+}
+
+const PEDIMENTO_NUM = /\d{2}\s?\d{2}\s?\d{4}\s?\d{7}/;
+
+// --- pedimento_simplificado --------------------------------------------------
+// Original: AVISO/COVE excluded; title "FORMA SIMPLIFICADA DE[L] PEDIMENTO"
+// short-circuits to true; otherwise the header trio (all three) qualifies.
+// Copy markers are NOT made negative here — they let `pedimento_completo`
+// outscore on completo layouts, which reproduces the title short-circuit.
+const simplificado = {
+  documentType: 'pedimento_simplificado',
+  extensions: ['pdf'],
+  minScore: 3, // title(5) OR full header trio(1+1+1)
+  priority: 1,
+  ...reuse(pedimentoSimplificadoDefinition),
+  clues: [
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /AVISO\s+CONSOLIDADO/i, negative: true },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /COMPROBANTE\s+DE\s+VALOR\s+ELECTR[ÓO]NICO/i,
+      negative: true,
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /FORMA\s+SIMPLIFICADA\s+DEL?\s+PEDIMENTO/i,
+      weight: 5,
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /NUM\.?\s*PEDIMENTO:/i, weight: 1 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /CVE\.?\s*PEDIMENTO:/i, weight: 1 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /T\.?\s*OPER:?/i, weight: 1 },
+  ],
+};
+
+// --- pedimento_completo ------------------------------------------------------
+// Original: exclude FORMA SIMPLIFICADA & AVISO; (header trio AND ≥1 copy marker)
+// OR clue-count heuristic (>25% of ~18 clues ≈ ≥5).
+const completo = {
+  documentType: 'pedimento_completo',
+  extensions: ['pdf'],
+  minScore: 5, // header trio(3) + 1 copy marker(2), or ≥5 fallback clues
+  priority: 1,
+  ...reuse(pedimentoCompletoDefinition),
+  clues: [
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /FORMA\s+SIMPLIFICADA\s+DEL?\s+PEDIMENTO/i,
+      negative: true,
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /AVISO\s+CONSOLIDADO/i, negative: true },
+    // header trio
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /NUM\.?\s*PEDIMENTO:/i, weight: 1 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /CVE\.?\s*PEDIMENTO:/i, weight: 1 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /T\.?\s*OPER:?/i, weight: 1 },
+    // copy markers (long-form pedimento signatures)
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /ORIGINAL:\s*ADMINISTRACION GENERAL DE ADUANAS/i,
+      weight: 2,
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /SEGUNDA\s+COPIA/i, weight: 2 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /TERCERA\s+COPIA/i, weight: 2 },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /COPIA\s+(SIMPLIFICAD[AO])?\s*TRANSPORTISTA/i,
+      weight: 2,
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /DEFINITIVO/i, weight: 2 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /ANEXO\s+DEL\s+PEDIMENTO/i, weight: 2 },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /\*+FIN\s+DE\s+PEDIMENTO\s*\*+/i,
+      weight: 2,
+    },
+    // exotic-layout fallback clues (weight 1 each)
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /CERTIFICACIONES/i, weight: 1 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /CUADRO\s+DE\s+LIQUIDACION/i, weight: 1 },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /\*\*\*\s+PAGO\s+ELECTRONICO\s+\*\*\*/i,
+      weight: 1,
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /MEDIOS\s+DE\s+TRANSPORTE/i, weight: 1 },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /DATOS\s+DEL\s+IMPORTADOR\/EXPORTADOR/i,
+      weight: 1,
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /DATOS\s+DEL\s+PROVEEDOR\s+O\s+COMPRADOR/i,
+      weight: 1,
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /LINEA\s+DE\s+CAPTURA:/i, weight: 1 },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /DECLARO\s+BAJO\s+PROTESTA\s+DE\s+DECIR\s+VERDAD/i,
+      weight: 1,
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /PEDIMENTO\s+ELABORADO\s+DE\s+CONFORMIDAD/i,
+      weight: 1,
+    },
+  ],
+};
+
+// --- pedimento_completo_xml --------------------------------------------------
+// Original: single condition — the VUCEM response root tag.
+const completoXml = {
+  documentType: 'pedimento_completo_xml',
+  extensions: ['xml'],
+  minScore: 1,
+  priority: 2, // authoritative signal — must dominate doda_xml/support on XML
+  ...reuse(pedimentoCompletoXmlDefinition),
+  clues: [
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /consultarPedimentoCompletoRespuesta/i,
+      weight: 10,
+      required: true,
+    },
+  ],
+};
+
+// --- doda_pdf ----------------------------------------------------------------
+// Original: primary marker → true; OR (≥2 secondary + pedimento#);
+// OR (doda-context + pedimento# + ≥1 secondary).
+const dodaPdf = {
+  documentType: 'doda_pdf',
+  extensions: ['pdf'],
+  priority: 1,
+  qualify: [
+    { primary: 1 },
+    { secondary: 2, pedimento: 1 },
+    { context: 1, pedimento: 1, secondary: 1 },
+  ],
+  ...reuse(dodaPdfDefinition),
+  clues: [
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /DOCUMENTO DE OPERACI[OÓ]N PARA DESPACHO ADUANERO/i,
+      weight: 5,
+      group: 'primary',
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /DODA/i, weight: 1, group: 'secondary' },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /VUCEM/i, weight: 1, group: 'secondary' },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: PEDIMENTO_NUM,
+      weight: 1,
+      group: 'pedimento',
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /despacho aduanero|operaci[oó]n aduanera|validaci[oó]n/i,
+      weight: 1,
+      group: 'context',
+    },
+  ],
+};
+
+// --- doda_xml ----------------------------------------------------------------
+// Original: ≥1 doda marker → true; OR (≥3 pedimento markers AND <?xml).
+const dodaXml = {
+  documentType: 'doda_xml',
+  extensions: ['xml'],
+  priority: 1,
+  qualify: [{ doda: 1 }, { pedimento: 3, xml: 1 }],
+  ...reuse(dodaXmlDefinition),
+  clues: [
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /documentoOperacion/i,
+      weight: 3,
+      group: 'doda',
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /despachoAduanero/i,
+      weight: 3,
+      group: 'doda',
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /<doda\b/i, weight: 3, group: 'doda' },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /xmlns[^"]*doda/i,
+      weight: 3,
+      group: 'doda',
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /VUCEM/i, weight: 3, group: 'doda' },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /numPedimento/i,
+      weight: 1,
+      group: 'pedimento',
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /patenteAduanal/i,
+      weight: 1,
+      group: 'pedimento',
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /aduanaDespacho/i,
+      weight: 1,
+      group: 'pedimento',
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /tipoOperacion/i,
+      weight: 1,
+      group: 'pedimento',
+    },
+    // structural gate for the pedimento-markers path (weight 0 = gate only)
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /<\?xml/i, weight: 0, group: 'xml' },
+  ],
+};
+
+// --- factura_inter_agencia ---------------------------------------------------
+// Original: isCfdiContent AND ≥2 distinct configured RFCs AND broker clave.
+// The pair of agency RFCs and the broker-service clave are modelled as REQUIRED
+// clues, which is what lets this win over `factura_comercial` purely by score —
+// no registration-order dependency. (Scope-limited to the configured pair, same
+// as the original; widening means making RFC presence a counting rule.)
+const interAgencia = {
+  documentType: 'factura_inter_agencia',
+  extensions: ['xml', 'pdf'],
+  minScore: 25, // both required RFCs (10+10) + required clave (5)
+  priority: 3,
+  ...reuse(facturaInterAgenciaDefinition),
+  clues: [
+    ...INTER_AGENCIA_RFCS.map((rfc) => ({
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: new RegExp(`\\b${rfc}\\b`, 'i'),
+      weight: 10,
+      required: true,
+    })),
+    // BROKER_SERVICE_CLAVE_PROD_SERV (78141502 = servicios de agentes aduaneros)
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /78141502/, weight: 5, required: true },
+    // CFDI content markers (informational positive signal)
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /cfdi:Comprobante/i, weight: 1 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /xmlns:cfdi/i, weight: 1 },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /TipoDeComprobante/i, weight: 1 },
+  ],
+};
+
+// --- factura_comercial -------------------------------------------------------
+// Original: cfdiMatches≥2 OR (invoiceMatches≥1 AND customsMatches≥1).
+// Faithfully expressed with clue groups + qualify (OR-of-ANDs) — a flat
+// minScore could not enforce the "invoice AND customs" pairing and produced
+// false positives on COVE acuses (customs keywords alone reaching the threshold).
+const facturaComercial = {
+  documentType: 'factura_comercial',
+  extensions: ['pdf', 'xml'],
+  priority: 0,
+  qualify: [{ cfdi: 2 }, { invoice: 1, customs: 1 }],
+  ...reuse(facturasComerciales),
+  clues: [
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /cfdi:Comprobante/i, group: 'cfdi' },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /xmlns:cfdi/i, group: 'cfdi' },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /TipoDeComprobante/i, group: 'cfdi' },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /timbreFiscalDigital/i, group: 'cfdi' },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /SelloSAT/i, group: 'cfdi' },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /factura\s*(comercial|de\s*venta|de\s*exportaci[oó]n)?/i,
+      group: 'invoice',
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /commercial\s*invoice/i,
+      group: 'invoice',
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /invoice\s*number/i, group: 'invoice' },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /n[uú]mero\s*de\s*factura/i,
+      group: 'invoice',
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /pedimento/i, group: 'customs' },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /aduana/i, group: 'customs' },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /importaci[oó]n|exportaci[oó]n/i,
+      group: 'customs',
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /despacho\s*aduanero/i,
+      group: 'customs',
+    },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /fracci[oó]n\s*arancelaria/i,
+      group: 'customs',
+    },
+  ],
+};
+
+// --- support_document --------------------------------------------------------
+// Original: soapFound≥2 OR customsFound≥2. Broad fallback → lowest priority so
+// it only wins when no specific matcher qualifies.
+const supportDocument = {
+  documentType: 'support_document',
+  extensions: ['xml', 'txt', 'json'],
+  priority: -1,
+  qualify: [{ soap: 2 }, { customs: 2 }],
+  ...reuse(supportDocumentDefinition),
+  clues: [
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /soapenv:Envelope/i, group: 'soap' },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /xmlns:soapenv=/i, group: 'soap' },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /solicitarRecibirCoveServicio/i,
+      group: 'soap',
+    },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /tipoOperacion/i, group: 'soap' },
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /patenteAduanal/i, group: 'soap' },
+    // customs metadata fallback — original requires BOTH patterns present
+    { kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX', pattern: /rfc/i, group: 'customs' },
+    {
+      kind: 'CONTENT_REGEX',
+      pattern: /patente|aduana|customs|pedimento/i,
+      group: 'customs',
+    },
+  ],
+};
+
+/**
+ * Default/global seed set. Order is irrelevant — best-match selects the winner.
+ * (This becomes the seed for DEFAULT matchers when the model moves to the DB.)
+ */
+export const scoringMatchers = [
+  simplificado,
+  completo,
+  completoXml,
+  dodaPdf,
+  dodaXml,
+  interAgencia,
+  facturaComercial,
+  supportDocument,
+];

package/src/scoring/scoring-engine.js

@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/**
+ * Scoring-based document classification engine (PROTOTYPE).
+ *
+ * Replaces the "first-match-wins" selection in `document-type-shared.js`
+ * (`extractDocumentFields`) with "best-match": every applicable matcher is
+ * scored by the weight of the clues it satisfies, and the highest score wins.
+ * This removes the order-dependent registration that the current registry
+ * relies on (e.g. `factura_inter_agencia` MUST be evaluated before
+ * `facturas_comerciales`) — precedence now lives in clue weights / `required`
+ * / `negative` flags, not in array order.
+ *
+ * Matcher shape (see `matchers-seed.js`):
+ *   {
+ *     documentType, extensions[], minScore, priority,
+ *     clues: [{ kind, pattern, flags?, weight=1, group?, required=false, negative=false }],
+ *     qualify?: [{ <group>: minCount, ... }, ...],   // OR-of-ANDs gate
+ *     extractors, resolveType?, extractNumPedimento?, extractPedimentoYear?
+ *   }
+ *
+ * Two separable concerns:
+ *   - QUALIFICATION (does this matcher apply at all?): `required`/`negative`
+ *     clues plus an optional `qualify` rule set. `qualify` is a list of
+ *     alternative rules (OR); a rule is a map of `group -> minimum matched
+ *     clues` (AND across its entries). This expresses the grouped boolean gates
+ *     of the original matchers, e.g. `(cfdi>=2) OR (invoice>=1 AND customs>=1)`.
+ *     When `qualify` is absent, the gate falls back to `score >= minScore`.
+ *   - RANKING (which qualifying matcher wins?): always the weighted sum of
+ *     matched clues (`score`), tie-broken by fraction -> priority -> type.
+ *
+ * Selection only depends on clues/qualify. The winning matcher's `extractors` /
+ * `resolveType` / `extractNumPedimento` / `extractPedimentoYear` run AFTER
+ * selection with the same post-processing as `extractDocumentFields`, so a
+ * side-by-side comparison isolates the selection change.
+ */
+import path from 'path';
+
+import { FieldResult } from '../document-type-shared.js';
+
+function toRegExp(clue) {
+  return clue.pattern instanceof RegExp
+    ? clue.pattern
+    : new RegExp(clue.pattern, clue.flags ?? '');
+}
+
+function clueTarget(clue, ctx) {
+  // FILENAME_REGEX tests the file name; every other kind tests the content.
+  return clue.kind === 'FILENAME_REGEX'
+    ? (ctx.fileName ?? '')
+    : (ctx.source ?? '');
+}
+
+/**
+ * Score a single matcher against a document context.
+ * @returns {null} when the matcher does not apply (extension mismatch),
+ *          `{ disqualified: true, reason }` when a `required`/`negative` clue
+ *          rules it out, otherwise a scored result object.
+ */
+export function scoreMatcher(matcher, ctx) {
+  const ext = (ctx.extension ?? '').toLowerCase();
+  if (
+    Array.isArray(matcher.extensions) &&
+    matcher.extensions.length > 0 &&
+    ext &&
+    !matcher.extensions.includes(ext)
+  ) {
+    return null;
+  }
+
+  let matchedWeight = 0;
+  let totalWeight = 0;
+  const matchedClues = [];
+  const groupCounts = {};
+
+  for (const clue of matcher.clues ?? []) {
+    const weight = clue.weight ?? 1;
+    const hit = toRegExp(clue).test(clueTarget(clue, ctx));
+
+    if (clue.negative) {
+      if (hit) {
+        return {
+          documentType: matcher.documentType,
+          disqualified: true,
+          reason: `negative:${clue.pattern}`,
+        };
+      }
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    if (clue.required && !hit) {
+      return {
+        documentType: matcher.documentType,
+        disqualified: true,
+        reason: `required-missing:${clue.pattern}`,
+      };
+    }
+
+    totalWeight += weight;
+    if (hit) {
+      matchedWeight += weight;
+      matchedClues.push(clue);
+      if (clue.group) {
+        groupCounts[clue.group] = (groupCounts[clue.group] ?? 0) + 1;
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Qualification gate: `qualify` rules (OR-of-ANDs over group counts) when
+  // present, otherwise the weighted-score threshold.
+  const passed = Array.isArray(matcher.qualify)
+    ? matcher.qualify.some((rule) =>
+        Object.entries(rule).every(
+          ([group, min]) => (groupCounts[group] ?? 0) >= min,
+        ),
+      )
+    : matchedWeight >= (matcher.minScore ?? 1);
+
+  return {
+    documentType: matcher.documentType,
+    matcher,
+    disqualified: false,
+    score: matchedWeight,
+    totalWeight,
+    fraction: totalWeight > 0 ? matchedWeight / totalWeight : 0,
+    priority: matcher.priority ?? 0,
+    passed,
+    matchedClues,
+    groupCounts,
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * All qualifying candidates, sorted best-first.
+ * Order: score desc → fraction desc → priority desc → documentType (stable).
+ */
+export function scoreAll(matchers, ctx) {
+  const candidates = [];
+  for (const matcher of matchers) {
+    const result = scoreMatcher(matcher, ctx);
+    if (!result || result.disqualified || !result.passed) continue;
+    candidates.push(result);
+  }
+  candidates.sort(
+    (a, b) =>
+      b.score - a.score ||
+      b.fraction - a.fraction ||
+      b.priority - a.priority ||
+      String(a.documentType).localeCompare(String(b.documentType)),
+  );
+  return candidates;
+}
+
+export function selectBestMatch(matchers, ctx) {
+  return scoreAll(matchers, ctx)[0] ?? null;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Full classification: pick the best matcher, then run ITS extractors /
+ * resolveType / pedimento helpers. Post-selection logic mirrors
+ * `extractDocumentFields` so a comparison isolates the selection change.
+ *
+ * @returns {{ detectedType, fields, detectedPedimento, detectedPedimentoYear,
+ *             winner, candidates }}
+ */
+export function classifyDocument(matchers, { source, extension, filePath }) {
+  const ctx = {
+    source,
+    extension,
+    fileName: filePath ? path.basename(filePath) : '',
+  };
+  const candidates = scoreAll(matchers, ctx);
+  const winner = candidates[0] ?? null;
+
+  if (!winner) {
+    return {
+      detectedType: null,
+      fields: [],
+      detectedPedimento: null,
+      detectedPedimentoYear: null,
+      winner: null,
+      candidates,
+    };
+  }
+
+  const def = winner.matcher;
+  const fields = [];
+  for (const extractor of def.extractors ?? []) {
+    try {
+      fields.push(extractor.extract(source));
+    } catch {
+      fields.push(new FieldResult(extractor.field, false, null));
+    }
+  }
+
+  const resolvedType = def.resolveType
+    ? def.resolveType(fields)
+    : def.documentType;
+  const pedimento = def.extractNumPedimento
+    ? def.extractNumPedimento(source, fields, filePath)
+    : null;
+  const year = def.extractPedimentoYear
+    ? def.extractPedimentoYear(source, fields, filePath)
+    : null;
+
+  // Backfill numPedimento as a field (same as extractDocumentFields) so
+  // downstream consumers (composeArelaPath) see a consistent shape.
+  if (pedimento && !fields.some((f) => f.name === 'numPedimento')) {
+    fields.push(new FieldResult('numPedimento', true, pedimento));
+  }
+
+  return {
+    detectedType: resolvedType,
+    fields,
+    detectedPedimento: pedimento,
+    detectedPedimentoYear: year,
+    winner,
+    candidates,
+  };
+}

package/src/services/ScanApiService.js

@@ -389,6 +389,20 @@ export class ScanApiService {
     return result;
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Fetch the resolved matcher set (this RFC's matchers + globals) for runtime
+   * classification. Returns an array of matchers with clues + fieldExtractors.
+   * @param {string|null} rfc - optional RFC to scope per-company matchers
+   */
+  async getResolvedMatchers(rfc = null) {
+    const qs = rfc ? `?rfc=${encodeURIComponent(rfc)}` : '';
+    const result = await this.#request(
+      `/api/document-matcher/resolved${qs}`,
+      'GET',
+    );
+    return Array.isArray(result) ? result : [];
+  }
+
   async fetchPdfsForDetection(
     tableName,
     offset = 0,