@api-client/core 0.19.40 → 0.19.42
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/build/src/index.d.ts +1 -1
- package/build/src/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/RuntimeApiModel.d.ts +20 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/RuntimeApiModel.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/RuntimeApiModel.js +133 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/RuntimeApiModel.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/index.d.ts +2 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/index.js +1 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AccessRule.d.ts +40 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AccessRule.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AccessRule.js +44 -2
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AccessRule.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AllowAuthenticated.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AllowAuthenticated.js +9 -2
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AllowAuthenticated.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AllowPublic.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AllowPublic.js +9 -2
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/AllowPublic.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/LifecycleStatus.d.ts +36 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/LifecycleStatus.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/LifecycleStatus.js +60 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/LifecycleStatus.js.map +1 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchEmailDomain.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchEmailDomain.js +9 -2
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchEmailDomain.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceAttribute.d.ts +38 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceAttribute.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceAttribute.js +68 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceAttribute.js.map +1 -0
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceOwner.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceOwner.js +8 -2
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceOwner.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchUserProperty.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchUserProperty.js +9 -2
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchUserProperty.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchUserRole.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchUserRole.js +9 -2
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/MatchUserRole.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/index.d.ts +8 -6
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/index.js +8 -2
- package/build/src/modeling/rules/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/build/tsconfig.tsbuildinfo +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/modeling/RuntimeApiModel.ts +166 -2
- package/src/modeling/rules/AccessRule.ts +70 -2
- package/src/modeling/rules/AllowAuthenticated.ts +13 -2
- package/src/modeling/rules/AllowPublic.ts +13 -2
- package/src/modeling/rules/LifecycleStatus.ts +71 -0
- package/src/modeling/rules/MatchEmailDomain.ts +13 -2
- package/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceAttribute.ts +82 -0
- package/src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceOwner.ts +12 -2
- package/src/modeling/rules/MatchUserProperty.ts +13 -2
- package/src/modeling/rules/MatchUserRole.ts +13 -2
- package/tests/unit/modeling/RuntimeApiModel.spec.ts +189 -1
- package/tests/unit/modeling/actions/Action.spec.ts +2 -2
- package/tests/unit/modeling/actions/CreateAction.spec.ts +1 -1
- package/tests/unit/modeling/actions/ReadAction.spec.ts +2 -2
- package/tests/unit/modeling/exposed_entity.spec.ts +1 -1
- package/tests/unit/modeling/rules/AccessRule.spec.ts +5 -5
- package/tests/unit/modeling/rules/LifecycleStatus.spec.ts +55 -0
- package/tests/unit/modeling/rules/MatchResourceAttribute.spec.ts +66 -0
|
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars */
|
|
1
2
|
import { test } from '@japa/runner'
|
|
2
3
|
import { ApiModel } from '../../../src/modeling/ApiModel.js'
|
|
3
|
-
import { RuntimeApiModel, type RuntimeApiModelSchema } from '../../../src/modeling/RuntimeApiModel.js'
|
|
4
|
+
import { RuleEvaluator, RuntimeApiModel, type RuntimeApiModelSchema } from '../../../src/modeling/RuntimeApiModel.js'
|
|
4
5
|
import { DataDomain } from '../../../src/modeling/DataDomain.js'
|
|
5
6
|
import { SemanticType } from '../../../src/modeling/Semantics.js'
|
|
7
|
+
import { AccessRule, AccessRuleExecutionPhase } from '../../../src/modeling/index.js'
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
7
9
|
test.group('RuntimeApiModel', () => {
|
|
8
10
|
test('initializes from schema', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
@@ -150,4 +152,190 @@ test.group('RuntimeApiModel', () => {
|
|
|
150
152
|
assert.equal(runtimeModel.cachedProperties.role?.key, roleProp.key)
|
|
151
153
|
assert.equal(runtimeModel.cachedProperties.username?.key, usernameProp.key)
|
|
152
154
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@runtime'])
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
test('evaluateAccess - rejects if any mandatory rule fails', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
157
|
+
const domain = new DataDomain({ info: { version: '1.0.0' } })
|
|
158
|
+
const baseModel = new ApiModel(
|
|
159
|
+
{ key: 'api-1', accessRule: [{ type: 'allowAuthenticated', mandatory: true }] },
|
|
160
|
+
domain
|
|
161
|
+
)
|
|
162
|
+
const runtimeModel = new RuntimeApiModel(baseModel.toJSON() as any, domain.toJSON())
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
const mockAction = {
|
|
165
|
+
entity: { accessRule: [], parent: undefined },
|
|
166
|
+
action: { kind: 'read', accessRule: [] },
|
|
167
|
+
} as any
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
const evaluator: RuleEvaluator = async (_rule: AccessRule): Promise<boolean> => false // Mandatory rule fails
|
|
170
|
+
const result = await runtimeModel.evaluateAccess(mockAction, evaluator, AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH)
|
|
171
|
+
assert.isFalse(result)
|
|
172
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@runtime', '@authorization'])
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
test('evaluateAccess - rejects by default if no rules hit', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
175
|
+
const domain = new DataDomain({ info: { version: '1.0.0' } })
|
|
176
|
+
const baseModel = new ApiModel({ key: 'api-1' }, domain)
|
|
177
|
+
const runtimeModel = new RuntimeApiModel(baseModel.toJSON() as any, domain.toJSON())
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
const mockAction = {
|
|
180
|
+
entity: {
|
|
181
|
+
accessRule: [{ type: 'allowPublic', metadata: { read: AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH } }],
|
|
182
|
+
parent: undefined,
|
|
183
|
+
},
|
|
184
|
+
action: { kind: 'read', accessRule: [] },
|
|
185
|
+
} as any
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
const evaluator: RuleEvaluator = async (_rule: AccessRule): Promise<undefined> => undefined // No rules match
|
|
188
|
+
const result = await runtimeModel.evaluateAccess(mockAction, evaluator, AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH)
|
|
189
|
+
assert.isFalse(result)
|
|
190
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@runtime', '@authorization'])
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
test('evaluateAccess - evaluates from most specific to most general in permission phase', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
193
|
+
const domain = new DataDomain({ info: { version: '1.0.0' } })
|
|
194
|
+
const baseModel = new ApiModel({ key: 'api-1', accessRule: [{ type: 'allowAuthenticated' }] }, domain)
|
|
195
|
+
const runtimeModel = new RuntimeApiModel(baseModel.toJSON() as any, domain.toJSON())
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
const mockAction = {
|
|
198
|
+
entity: {
|
|
199
|
+
accessRule: [{ type: 'allowPublic', metadata: { read: AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH } }],
|
|
200
|
+
parent: undefined,
|
|
201
|
+
},
|
|
202
|
+
action: {
|
|
203
|
+
kind: 'read',
|
|
204
|
+
accessRule: [{ type: 'matchEmailDomain', metadata: { read: AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH } }],
|
|
205
|
+
},
|
|
206
|
+
} as any
|
|
207
|
+
|
|
208
|
+
const evaluatedOrder: string[] = []
|
|
209
|
+
const evaluator: RuleEvaluator = async (rule: AccessRule): Promise<undefined> => {
|
|
210
|
+
evaluatedOrder.push(rule.type)
|
|
211
|
+
return undefined // Continue to next rule
|
|
212
|
+
}
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
await runtimeModel.evaluateAccess(mockAction, evaluator, AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH)
|
|
215
|
+
assert.deepEqual(evaluatedOrder, ['matchEmailDomain', 'allowPublic', 'allowAuthenticated'])
|
|
216
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@runtime', '@authorization'])
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
test('evaluateAccess - short-circuits on explicit allow or deny in permission phase', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
219
|
+
const domain = new DataDomain({ info: { version: '1.0.0' } })
|
|
220
|
+
const baseModel = new ApiModel({ key: 'api-1', accessRule: [{ type: 'allowAuthenticated' }] }, domain)
|
|
221
|
+
const runtimeModel = new RuntimeApiModel(baseModel.toJSON() as any, domain.toJSON())
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
const mockAction = {
|
|
224
|
+
entity: {
|
|
225
|
+
accessRule: [{ type: 'allowPublic', metadata: { read: AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH } }],
|
|
226
|
+
parent: undefined,
|
|
227
|
+
},
|
|
228
|
+
action: {
|
|
229
|
+
kind: 'read',
|
|
230
|
+
accessRule: [{ type: 'matchEmailDomain', metadata: { read: AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH } }],
|
|
231
|
+
},
|
|
232
|
+
} as any
|
|
233
|
+
|
|
234
|
+
const evaluatedOrder: string[] = []
|
|
235
|
+
const evaluator = async (rule: any) => {
|
|
236
|
+
evaluatedOrder.push(rule.type)
|
|
237
|
+
if (rule.type === 'allowPublic') return true
|
|
238
|
+
return undefined
|
|
239
|
+
}
|
|
240
|
+
|
|
241
|
+
const result = await runtimeModel.evaluateAccess(mockAction, evaluator, AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH)
|
|
242
|
+
assert.isTrue(result)
|
|
243
|
+
// Should not reach the api-rule
|
|
244
|
+
assert.deepEqual(evaluatedOrder, ['matchEmailDomain', 'allowPublic'])
|
|
245
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@runtime', '@authorization'])
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
test('evaluateAccess - passes mandatory phase and uses permission phase result', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
248
|
+
const domain = new DataDomain({ info: { version: '1.0.0' } })
|
|
249
|
+
const baseModel = new ApiModel(
|
|
250
|
+
{ key: 'api-1', accessRule: [{ type: 'allowAuthenticated', mandatory: true }] },
|
|
251
|
+
domain
|
|
252
|
+
)
|
|
253
|
+
const runtimeModel = new RuntimeApiModel(baseModel.toJSON() as any, domain.toJSON())
|
|
254
|
+
|
|
255
|
+
const mockAction = {
|
|
256
|
+
entity: {
|
|
257
|
+
accessRule: [{ type: 'allowPublic', metadata: { read: AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH } }],
|
|
258
|
+
parent: undefined,
|
|
259
|
+
},
|
|
260
|
+
action: { kind: 'read', accessRule: [] },
|
|
261
|
+
} as any
|
|
262
|
+
|
|
263
|
+
const evaluator = async (rule: any) => {
|
|
264
|
+
if (rule.mandatory) return true // passes mandatory check
|
|
265
|
+
if (rule.type === 'allowPublic') return false // explicitly denies
|
|
266
|
+
return undefined
|
|
267
|
+
}
|
|
268
|
+
|
|
269
|
+
const result = await runtimeModel.evaluateAccess(mockAction, evaluator, AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH)
|
|
270
|
+
assert.isFalse(result) // Denied by permission rule
|
|
271
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@runtime', '@authorization'])
|
|
272
|
+
|
|
273
|
+
test('evaluateAccess - shadows parent rules of the same type', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
274
|
+
const domain = new DataDomain({ info: { version: '1.0.0' } })
|
|
275
|
+
const model = domain.addModel({ key: 'mod-1' })
|
|
276
|
+
const entity = model.addEntity({ key: 'ent-1' })
|
|
277
|
+
|
|
278
|
+
// Create base model with exposing and actions directly in schema
|
|
279
|
+
const baseModel = new ApiModel(
|
|
280
|
+
{
|
|
281
|
+
key: 'api-1',
|
|
282
|
+
accessRule: [{ type: 'allowAuthenticated' }, { type: 'matchEmailDomain' }],
|
|
283
|
+
exposes: [
|
|
284
|
+
{
|
|
285
|
+
key: entity.key,
|
|
286
|
+
entity: { key: entity.key },
|
|
287
|
+
accessRule: [
|
|
288
|
+
{ type: 'allowPublic', mandatory: false },
|
|
289
|
+
{ type: 'matchEmailDomain', mandatory: true },
|
|
290
|
+
],
|
|
291
|
+
actions: [
|
|
292
|
+
{
|
|
293
|
+
kind: 'read',
|
|
294
|
+
accessRule: [{ type: 'allowAuthenticated', mandatory: true }],
|
|
295
|
+
},
|
|
296
|
+
],
|
|
297
|
+
hasCollection: true,
|
|
298
|
+
kind: 'Core#ExposedEntity',
|
|
299
|
+
resourcePath: '',
|
|
300
|
+
},
|
|
301
|
+
],
|
|
302
|
+
},
|
|
303
|
+
domain
|
|
304
|
+
)
|
|
305
|
+
|
|
306
|
+
// Hierarchy will be:
|
|
307
|
+
// Action: allowAuthenticated (mandatory)
|
|
308
|
+
// Entity: allowPublic, matchEmailDomain (mandatory)
|
|
309
|
+
// API: allowAuthenticated, matchEmailDomain
|
|
310
|
+
|
|
311
|
+
// Effective Rules (with shadowing):
|
|
312
|
+
// Action's allowAuthenticated (mandatory) shadows API's allowAuthenticated
|
|
313
|
+
// Entity's matchEmailDomain (mandatory) shadows API's matchEmailDomain
|
|
314
|
+
// Entity's allowPublic is kept
|
|
315
|
+
|
|
316
|
+
// Mandatory: allowAuthenticated, matchEmailDomain
|
|
317
|
+
// Permission: allowPublic
|
|
318
|
+
|
|
319
|
+
const schema: RuntimeApiModelSchema = {
|
|
320
|
+
...baseModel.toJSON(),
|
|
321
|
+
routingMap: {
|
|
322
|
+
GET: [{ path: '/test', lookup: { exposedEntityKey: entity.key, actionKind: 'read' } }],
|
|
323
|
+
},
|
|
324
|
+
}
|
|
325
|
+
|
|
326
|
+
const runtimeModel = new RuntimeApiModel(schema, domain.toJSON())
|
|
327
|
+
const mockAction = runtimeModel.lookupAction('GET', '/test')!
|
|
328
|
+
|
|
329
|
+
const evaluatedOrder: string[] = []
|
|
330
|
+
const evaluator: RuleEvaluator = async (rule: AccessRule): Promise<boolean | undefined> => {
|
|
331
|
+
evaluatedOrder.push(`${rule.type}${rule.mandatory ? '-mandatory' : ''}`)
|
|
332
|
+
if (rule.mandatory) return true
|
|
333
|
+
return undefined
|
|
334
|
+
}
|
|
335
|
+
|
|
336
|
+
await runtimeModel.evaluateAccess(mockAction, evaluator, AccessRuleExecutionPhase.PRE_FETCH)
|
|
337
|
+
|
|
338
|
+
// Check that we only evaluate the shadowed rules, exactly once per phase
|
|
339
|
+
assert.deepEqual(evaluatedOrder, ['allowAuthenticated-mandatory', 'matchEmailDomain-mandatory', 'allowPublic'])
|
|
340
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@runtime', '@authorization'])
|
|
153
341
|
})
|
|
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ test.group('Action', () => {
|
|
|
60
60
|
notified = true
|
|
61
61
|
})
|
|
62
62
|
|
|
63
|
-
action.accessRule = [new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), { type: 'allowPublic' })]
|
|
63
|
+
action.accessRule = [new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, { type: 'allowPublic' })]
|
|
64
64
|
await Promise.resolve()
|
|
65
65
|
assert.isTrue(notified)
|
|
66
66
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@action', '@observed'])
|
|
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ test.group('Action', () => {
|
|
|
111
111
|
|
|
112
112
|
test('getAllRules() aggregates rules from action and parent', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
113
113
|
const parent = {
|
|
114
|
-
getAllRules: () => [new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), { type: 'allowPublic' })],
|
|
114
|
+
getAllRules: () => [new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, { type: 'allowPublic' })],
|
|
115
115
|
notifyChange: () => {},
|
|
116
116
|
} as unknown as ExposedEntity
|
|
117
117
|
|
|
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ test.group('CreateAction', () => {
|
|
|
59
59
|
})
|
|
60
60
|
|
|
61
61
|
// Modify inherited property
|
|
62
|
-
action.accessRule = [new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), { type: 'allowPublic' })]
|
|
62
|
+
action.accessRule = [new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, { type: 'allowPublic' })]
|
|
63
63
|
await Promise.resolve()
|
|
64
64
|
assert.isTrue(notified)
|
|
65
65
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@action', '@create-action', '@observed'])
|
|
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ test.group('ReadAction', () => {
|
|
|
59
59
|
})
|
|
60
60
|
|
|
61
61
|
// Modify inherited property
|
|
62
|
-
action.accessRule = [new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), { type: 'allowPublic' })]
|
|
62
|
+
action.accessRule = [new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, { type: 'allowPublic' })]
|
|
63
63
|
await Promise.resolve()
|
|
64
64
|
assert.isTrue(notified)
|
|
65
65
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@action', '@read-action', '@observed'])
|
|
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ test.group('ReadAction', () => {
|
|
|
71
71
|
notified = true
|
|
72
72
|
})
|
|
73
73
|
|
|
74
|
-
action.accessRule.push(new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), { type: 'allowPublic' }))
|
|
74
|
+
action.accessRule.push(new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, { type: 'allowPublic' }))
|
|
75
75
|
await Promise.resolve()
|
|
76
76
|
assert.isTrue(notified)
|
|
77
77
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@action', '@read-action', '@observed'])
|
|
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ test.group('ExposedEntity', () => {
|
|
|
308
308
|
|
|
309
309
|
test('getAllRules() aggregates rules from entity, parent, and API', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
310
310
|
const model = new ApiModel()
|
|
311
|
-
model.accessRule = [new AccessRule(model, { type: 'allowPublic' })]
|
|
311
|
+
model.accessRule = [new AccessRule(model, {}, { type: 'allowPublic' })]
|
|
312
312
|
|
|
313
313
|
const rootEx = new ExposedEntity(model, {
|
|
314
314
|
key: 'root',
|
|
@@ -4,24 +4,24 @@ import { mockExposedEntity } from '../actions/helpers.js'
|
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
5
|
test.group('AccessRule', () => {
|
|
6
6
|
test('initializes with default values', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
7
|
-
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity())
|
|
7
|
+
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {})
|
|
8
8
|
assert.equal(rule.type, '')
|
|
9
9
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@access-rule'])
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
11
|
test('initializes with provided values', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
12
12
|
const schema: AccessRuleSchema = { type: 'public' }
|
|
13
|
-
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), schema)
|
|
13
|
+
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, schema)
|
|
14
14
|
assert.equal(rule.type, 'public')
|
|
15
15
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@access-rule'])
|
|
16
16
|
|
|
17
17
|
test('serializes to JSON', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
18
|
-
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), { type: 'authenticated' })
|
|
18
|
+
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, { type: 'authenticated' })
|
|
19
19
|
const json = rule.toJSON()
|
|
20
20
|
assert.deepEqual(json, { type: 'authenticated' })
|
|
21
21
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@access-rule'])
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
23
|
test('notifies change', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
24
|
-
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), { type: 'public' })
|
|
24
|
+
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, { type: 'public' })
|
|
25
25
|
let notified = false
|
|
26
26
|
rule.addEventListener('change', () => {
|
|
27
27
|
notified = true
|
|
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ test.group('AccessRule', () => {
|
|
|
32
32
|
}).tags(['@modeling', '@access-rule'])
|
|
33
33
|
|
|
34
34
|
test('toJSON returns safe copy (immutability)', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
35
|
-
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), { type: 'public' })
|
|
35
|
+
const rule = new AccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {}, { type: 'public' })
|
|
36
36
|
const json = rule.toJSON()
|
|
37
37
|
|
|
38
38
|
// Modify JSON (simulate runtime mutation)
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { test } from '@japa/runner'
|
|
2
|
+
import { LifecycleStatusAccessRule } from '../../../../src/modeling/rules/LifecycleStatus.js'
|
|
3
|
+
import { mockExposedEntity } from '../actions/helpers.js'
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
test.group('LifecycleStatusAccessRule', () => {
|
|
6
|
+
test('initializes with default values', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
7
|
+
const rule = new LifecycleStatusAccessRule(mockExposedEntity())
|
|
8
|
+
assert.equal(rule.type, 'lifecycleStatus')
|
|
9
|
+
assert.deepEqual(rule.allowedStatuses, [])
|
|
10
|
+
assert.deepEqual(rule.deniedStatuses, [])
|
|
11
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@lifecycle-status'])
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
test('initializes with provided values', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
14
|
+
const rule = new LifecycleStatusAccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {
|
|
15
|
+
allowedStatuses: ['published'],
|
|
16
|
+
deniedStatuses: ['archived'],
|
|
17
|
+
})
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
assert.equal(rule.type, 'lifecycleStatus')
|
|
20
|
+
assert.deepEqual(rule.allowedStatuses, ['published'])
|
|
21
|
+
assert.deepEqual(rule.deniedStatuses, ['archived'])
|
|
22
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@lifecycle-status'])
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
test('toJSON returns valid schema', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
25
|
+
const rule = new LifecycleStatusAccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {
|
|
26
|
+
allowedStatuses: ['active', 'pending'],
|
|
27
|
+
})
|
|
28
|
+
const json = rule.toJSON()
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
assert.equal(json.type, 'lifecycleStatus')
|
|
31
|
+
assert.deepEqual(json.allowedStatuses, ['active', 'pending'])
|
|
32
|
+
assert.isUndefined(json.deniedStatuses)
|
|
33
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@lifecycle-status', '@serialization'])
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
test('toJSON omits empty arrays', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
36
|
+
const rule = new LifecycleStatusAccessRule(mockExposedEntity())
|
|
37
|
+
const json = rule.toJSON()
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
assert.equal(json.type, 'lifecycleStatus')
|
|
40
|
+
assert.isUndefined(json.allowedStatuses)
|
|
41
|
+
assert.isUndefined(json.deniedStatuses)
|
|
42
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@lifecycle-status', '@serialization'])
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
test('notifies change when allowedStatuses changes', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
45
|
+
const rule = new LifecycleStatusAccessRule(mockExposedEntity())
|
|
46
|
+
let notified = false
|
|
47
|
+
rule.addEventListener('change', () => {
|
|
48
|
+
notified = true
|
|
49
|
+
})
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
rule.allowedStatuses.push('draft')
|
|
52
|
+
await Promise.resolve()
|
|
53
|
+
assert.isTrue(notified)
|
|
54
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@lifecycle-status', '@observed'])
|
|
55
|
+
})
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { test } from '@japa/runner'
|
|
2
|
+
import { MatchResourceAttributeAccessRule } from '../../../../src/modeling/rules/MatchResourceAttribute.js'
|
|
3
|
+
import { mockExposedEntity } from '../actions/helpers.js'
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
test.group('MatchResourceAttributeAccessRule', () => {
|
|
6
|
+
test('initializes with default values', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
7
|
+
const rule = new MatchResourceAttributeAccessRule(mockExposedEntity())
|
|
8
|
+
assert.equal(rule.type, 'matchResourceAttribute')
|
|
9
|
+
assert.equal(rule.attribute, '')
|
|
10
|
+
assert.equal(rule.value, '')
|
|
11
|
+
assert.equal(rule.operator, 'equal')
|
|
12
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@match-resource-attribute'])
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
test('initializes with provided values', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
15
|
+
const rule = new MatchResourceAttributeAccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {
|
|
16
|
+
attribute: 'status',
|
|
17
|
+
value: 'published',
|
|
18
|
+
operator: 'notEqual',
|
|
19
|
+
})
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
assert.equal(rule.type, 'matchResourceAttribute')
|
|
22
|
+
assert.equal(rule.attribute, 'status')
|
|
23
|
+
assert.equal(rule.value, 'published')
|
|
24
|
+
assert.equal(rule.operator, 'notEqual')
|
|
25
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@match-resource-attribute'])
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
test('toJSON returns valid schema', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
28
|
+
const rule = new MatchResourceAttributeAccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {
|
|
29
|
+
attribute: 'age',
|
|
30
|
+
value: 18,
|
|
31
|
+
operator: 'greaterThanOrEqual',
|
|
32
|
+
})
|
|
33
|
+
const json = rule.toJSON()
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
assert.equal(json.type, 'matchResourceAttribute')
|
|
36
|
+
assert.equal(json.attribute, 'age')
|
|
37
|
+
assert.equal(json.value, 18)
|
|
38
|
+
assert.equal(json.operator, 'greaterThanOrEqual')
|
|
39
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@match-resource-attribute', '@serialization'])
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
test('toJSON omits operator when it is equal', ({ assert }) => {
|
|
42
|
+
const rule = new MatchResourceAttributeAccessRule(mockExposedEntity(), {
|
|
43
|
+
attribute: 'isPublic',
|
|
44
|
+
value: true,
|
|
45
|
+
operator: 'equal',
|
|
46
|
+
})
|
|
47
|
+
const json = rule.toJSON()
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
assert.equal(json.type, 'matchResourceAttribute')
|
|
50
|
+
assert.equal(json.attribute, 'isPublic')
|
|
51
|
+
assert.equal(json.value, true)
|
|
52
|
+
assert.equal(json.operator, 'equal')
|
|
53
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@match-resource-attribute', '@serialization'])
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
test('notifies change when attribute changes', async ({ assert }) => {
|
|
56
|
+
const rule = new MatchResourceAttributeAccessRule(mockExposedEntity())
|
|
57
|
+
let notified = false
|
|
58
|
+
rule.addEventListener('change', () => {
|
|
59
|
+
notified = true
|
|
60
|
+
})
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
rule.attribute = 'visibility'
|
|
63
|
+
await Promise.resolve()
|
|
64
|
+
assert.isTrue(notified)
|
|
65
|
+
}).tags(['@modeling', '@rule', '@match-resource-attribute', '@observed'])
|
|
66
|
+
})
|