@antoneeo/mkt-agentic-sdlc-skill 0.8.0 → 0.9.0

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,20 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## [0.9.0] - 2026-09-05
+
+Spine-only release: `review.md` updated byte-identical across the family
+(authored in the code lens, code 1.31.0).
+
+### Changed
+- **The form budget belongs to the FIRST draft (shared spine `review.md`).**
+  The lean operative form is the first draft's form, not the round-3 rescue:
+  the review request states the artifact's line count against a budget the
+  author fixed before drafting, and an artifact over budget is the reviewer's
+  first finding, before content. This replaces "rewrite lean at the latest
+  before round 3", which paid for the form only after two rounds had already
+  been spent reading a bloated artifact. The ~1,250 -> ~500 line measurement
+  already in the file is the budget's anchor.
+
 ## [0.8.0] - 2026-09-01
 
 Spine-only release: `review.md` updated byte-identical across the family

package/gemini-extension.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "mkt-agentic-sdlc",
-  "version": "0.8.0",
+  "version": "0.9.0",
   "description": "Evidence-First marketing planning protocol with engagement triage, SOSTAC workflow, evidence ledger and optional devPNT integration.",
   "author": "Antonio Pinto (https://github.com/Antoneeo)"
 }

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@antoneeo/mkt-agentic-sdlc-skill",
-  "version": "0.8.0",
+  "version": "0.9.0",
   "description": "Evidence-First marketing planning protocol for Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Google Antigravity and Codex: engagement triage, SOSTAC workflow, evidence ledger, mechanical validator and optional devPNT integration.",
   "keywords": [
     "claude-code",

package/skills/mkt-agentic-sdlc/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: mkt-agentic-sdlc
-version: 0.8.0
+version: 0.9.0
 description: Evidence-First marketing planning protocol with engagement triage, SOSTAC workflow, evidence ledger, adversarial CMO review, a complete Standalone mode and optional symbiosis with devPNT. Use for marketing plans, go-to-market strategy, campaign planning and market research.
 author: Antonio Pinto (https://github.com/Antoneeo)
 copyright: (c) 2026 Antonio Pinto

package/skills/mkt-agentic-sdlc/review.md

@@ -98,10 +98,12 @@ unfalsifiable, the same defect as an unnamed EXISTS or a faked router verdict.
 own findings and can make the cap unreachable honestly. (1) *Patch-on-patch*:
 each round's fixes are grafted onto the previous text until stale counts,
 duplicated sections and internal contradictions are findings the revisions
-themselves created. When a round's findings are of that artifact-consistency
-class — and at the latest before a round-3 attempt — rewrite the artifact lean
-and operative against the checklist instead of patching again; a from-scratch
-rewrite is cheaper than a burned round. (2) *Revision narrative in the
+themselves created. The lean operative form is the FIRST draft's form, not the
+round-3 rescue: the review request states the artifact's line count against a
+budget the author fixed before drafting (default: the measured figure below), and
+an artifact over budget is the reviewer's first finding, before content. When a
+round's findings are of that artifact-consistency class, rewrite lean instead of
+patching again. (2) *Revision narrative in the
 artifact*: the artifact under review carries its own review archaeology
 ("v1.2 fixed…", "as the round-2 review noted…"). An artifact states what IS,
 once; how it got there lives in the REVIEW_LOG row's notes, never in the