@anhth2/spec-driven-dev-plugin 0.9.1 → 0.10.0

package/commands/generate-spec-manifest.md

@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 
 **2. Route to service** — if active domain matches a key in `services`:
 - Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir`
-- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir`
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, the tech-design (API contract) is a cross-team artifact and must live in the shared spec repo (handled in step 4), so leave `tech_docs_dir` for step 4 to route — do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Store `active_service` = `services.{domain}.path`
 - Store `active_service_module` = `services.{domain}.module`
 - If service has its own `module` → use it as `active_module` (overrides `tech_stack.module`)
@@ -180,13 +180,14 @@ If `services` section is present:
 **4. Spec source auto-override** — if `setup.spec_source` is set AND the corresponding path was not already explicitly set in `paths:`:
 - Override `paths.prd_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/prd`
 - Override `paths.design_spec_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/design-spec`
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs` — **always when `spec_source` is set** (step 2 no longer pins tech-docs per-service in this case). The tech-design IS the cross-team API contract: BE authors it here, and FE/App read it from the same spec submodule at `/generate-code --phase=integration`. *(Per-service tech-docs only happen when there is no `spec_source` — a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module.)*
 - Override `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge`
 - Override `paths.business_dictionary` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
 - Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
 - Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
 
-> **Why under `spec_source`:** tester feedback (`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`) must land in the **shared spec repo** so PO/Dev see it when they `/sync`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default to `feedback/bug-reports` and `feedback/bdd-proposals` at repo root — still shared, same repo.
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, and tester feedback are all **cross-team artifacts** — they must live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same source via `/sync`. Tech-docs specifically: BE authors the tech-design (API contract), commits + pushes it into the spec submodule (2-layer commit), and FE/App pull it on their next `/sync` to wire the real API in `/generate-code --phase=integration`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default under the repo root — still shared, same repo.
 
 ---
 
@@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-
 | `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
 
 **3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
-- Shell commands (`/run-tests`, `/generate-tests`) run **from within** `service_root`
+- Shell commands (`/dev-run-test`, `/dev-gen-test`) run **from within** `service_root`
 - File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
 
 **4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
@@ -303,7 +304,7 @@ active_module = tech_stack.module   (e.g. "java-spring", "react", "flutter")
 
 If `tech_stack.module` is blank or not recognized → set `platform_type = "unknown"` and flag as ⚠️ in the Step 7 recap.
 
-These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (generate-tests, debug, fix-bug, smoke-test).
+These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (dev-gen-test, debug, fix-bug, dev-smoke-test).
 
 ---
 
@@ -528,13 +529,13 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 | /review-context (BDD)   | `/generate-tech-docs {UC-ID}` if APPROVED; regenerate if NEEDS_FIX |
 | /generate-tech-docs     | `/review-tech-docs {tech-design-file}`        |
 | /review-tech-docs       | `/generate-code {feature-file}` if APPROVED; fix doc if NEEDS_FIX |
-| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}` |
-| /generate-tests         | `/run-tests {UC-ID}`                          |
-| /run-tests (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
-| /run-tests (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
-| /review-code            | `/smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
-| /smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
-| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
+| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}` |
+| /dev-gen-test         | `/dev-run-test {UC-ID}`                          |
+| /dev-run-test (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
+| /dev-run-test (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
+| /review-code            | `/dev-smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
+| /dev-smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
+| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
 | /fix-bug                | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
 | /debug                  | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` if fix needed          |
 | /report-bug             | Send to dev (`/fix-bug {BUG-ID}`); if coverage gap → `/propose-scenario {UC-ID}` |

package/commands/generate-tech-docs.md

@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 
 **2. Route to service** — if active domain matches a key in `services`:
 - Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir`
-- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir`
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, the tech-design (API contract) is a cross-team artifact and must live in the shared spec repo (handled in step 4), so leave `tech_docs_dir` for step 4 to route — do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Store `active_service` = `services.{domain}.path`
 - Store `active_service_module` = `services.{domain}.module`
 - If service has its own `module` → use it as `active_module` (overrides `tech_stack.module`)
@@ -196,13 +196,14 @@ If `services` section is present:
 **4. Spec source auto-override** — if `setup.spec_source` is set AND the corresponding path was not already explicitly set in `paths:`:
 - Override `paths.prd_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/prd`
 - Override `paths.design_spec_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/design-spec`
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs` — **always when `spec_source` is set** (step 2 no longer pins tech-docs per-service in this case). The tech-design IS the cross-team API contract: BE authors it here, and FE/App read it from the same spec submodule at `/generate-code --phase=integration`. *(Per-service tech-docs only happen when there is no `spec_source` — a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module.)*
 - Override `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge`
 - Override `paths.business_dictionary` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
 - Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
 - Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
 
-> **Why under `spec_source`:** tester feedback (`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`) must land in the **shared spec repo** so PO/Dev see it when they `/sync`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default to `feedback/bug-reports` and `feedback/bdd-proposals` at repo root — still shared, same repo.
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, and tester feedback are all **cross-team artifacts** — they must live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same source via `/sync`. Tech-docs specifically: BE authors the tech-design (API contract), commits + pushes it into the spec submodule (2-layer commit), and FE/App pull it on their next `/sync` to wire the real API in `/generate-code --phase=integration`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default under the repo root — still shared, same repo.
 
 ---
 
@@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-
 | `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
 
 **3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
-- Shell commands (`/run-tests`, `/generate-tests`) run **from within** `service_root`
+- Shell commands (`/dev-run-test`, `/dev-gen-test`) run **from within** `service_root`
 - File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
 
 **4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
@@ -319,7 +320,7 @@ active_module = tech_stack.module   (e.g. "java-spring", "react", "flutter")
 
 If `tech_stack.module` is blank or not recognized → set `platform_type = "unknown"` and flag as ⚠️ in the Step 7 recap.
 
-These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (generate-tests, debug, fix-bug, smoke-test).
+These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (dev-gen-test, debug, fix-bug, dev-smoke-test).
 
 ---
 
@@ -453,25 +454,49 @@ Write `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md`:
 ---
 
 ## §1. Overview
+
+{Tóm tắt ngắn: UC này implement gì, scope kỹ thuật chính.}
+
 ## §2. API Endpoints
-  *Greenfield:* endpoints được infer từ BDD scenarios — thiết kế mới.
-  *Reverse-document:* mô tả lại API đã tồn tại từ bảng "Existing API Contract" trong PRD.
-    Ghi chú gaps nếu contract thực tế khác với BDD expectations.
-  | Method | Path | Auth/Role | Request | Response |
+
+*Greenfield:* endpoints được infer từ BDD scenarios — thiết kế mới.
+*Reverse-document:* mô tả lại API đã tồn tại từ bảng "Existing API Contract" trong PRD. Ghi chú gaps nếu contract thực tế khác với BDD expectations.
+
+| Method | Path | Auth/Role | Request | Response |
+|--------|------|-----------|---------|----------|
+| {GET/POST/PUT/DELETE} | {/api/v1/...} | {Bearer / role} | `{ field: type }` | `{ field: type }` |
+
 ## §3. Data Model
-  Key entities and relationships.
+
+Key entities and relationships.
+
 ## §4. Service Flow
-  {Client} → Controller → {Facade/Service} → {Repository}
+
+{Client} → Controller → {Facade/Service} → {Repository}
+
 ## §5. Business Rules Implementation
-  | BR-ID | Rule | Implementation approach |
+
+| BR-ID | Rule | Implementation approach |
+|-------|------|-------------------------|
+| {UC-ID}-BR1 | {rule} | {approach} |
+
 ## §6. Error Handling
-  | Scenario | Exception | HTTP Status |
+
+| Scenario | Exception | HTTP Status |
+|----------|-----------|-------------|
+| {scenario} | {ExceptionClass} | {4xx/5xx} |
+
 ## §7. Database Changes
-  Migration scripts or schema changes.
+
+Migration scripts or schema changes.
+
 ## §8. Caching Strategy
-  What to cache, TTL, invalidation triggers.
+
+What to cache, TTL, invalidation triggers.
+
 ## §9. Cross-Service Dependencies
-  External calls, events produced/consumed.
+
+External calls, events produced/consumed.
 
 ## Changelog
 
@@ -480,6 +505,21 @@ Write `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md`:
 | 1 | {YYYY-MM-DD} | Initial generation from {UC-ID}.feature (BDD v{bdd_version}) |
 ```
 
+## Publish — share the contract (umbrella + shared spec repo)
+
+If `paths.tech_docs_dir` resolved **under `setup.spec_source`** (e.g. `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs`), the tech-doc was just written **inside the spec submodule**. It is the cross-team **API contract** — FE/App read it via their own `/sync`. Publish it so they can (2-layer commit):
+
+```bash
+cd {spec_source}
+git add specs/tech-docs/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md
+git commit -m "docs({UC-ID}): tech design / API contract"
+git push origin {spec_branch}          # the branch FE/App track in .gitmodules
+cd -
+git add {spec_source} && git commit -m "chore: bump spec pointer ({UC-ID} tech design)"
+```
+
+If `tech_docs_dir` is **local** — i.e. no `setup.spec_source` (single-repo, or a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module) — skip this; no cross-repo publish needed. Whenever `spec_source` is set, tech-docs route to the spec submodule and this publish step applies.
+
 ## Output
 
 # Report Footer — Standard Command Output Format
@@ -520,13 +560,13 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 | /review-context (BDD)   | `/generate-tech-docs {UC-ID}` if APPROVED; regenerate if NEEDS_FIX |
 | /generate-tech-docs     | `/review-tech-docs {tech-design-file}`        |
 | /review-tech-docs       | `/generate-code {feature-file}` if APPROVED; fix doc if NEEDS_FIX |
-| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}` |
-| /generate-tests         | `/run-tests {UC-ID}`                          |
-| /run-tests (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
-| /run-tests (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
-| /review-code            | `/smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
-| /smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
-| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
+| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}` |
+| /dev-gen-test         | `/dev-run-test {UC-ID}`                          |
+| /dev-run-test (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
+| /dev-run-test (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
+| /review-code            | `/dev-smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
+| /dev-smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
+| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
 | /fix-bug                | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
 | /debug                  | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` if fix needed          |
 | /report-bug             | Send to dev (`/fix-bug {BUG-ID}`); if coverage gap → `/propose-scenario {UC-ID}` |
@@ -549,5 +589,6 @@ Next   : {suggested command with example arguments}
 File: {paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md
 Next: /review-tech-docs {paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md
       ← SA/Lead review required before code generation
+      → if tech-docs live in the shared spec repo: commit + push to the spec submodule (see Publish above) so FE/App `/sync` can read the contract
       → after approved: /generate-code {paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-{slug}.feature
 ```

package/commands/generate-tech-docs.tmpl

@@ -101,25 +101,49 @@ Write `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md`:
 ---
 
 ## §1. Overview
+
+{Tóm tắt ngắn: UC này implement gì, scope kỹ thuật chính.}
+
 ## §2. API Endpoints
-  *Greenfield:* endpoints được infer từ BDD scenarios — thiết kế mới.
-  *Reverse-document:* mô tả lại API đã tồn tại từ bảng "Existing API Contract" trong PRD.
-    Ghi chú gaps nếu contract thực tế khác với BDD expectations.
-  | Method | Path | Auth/Role | Request | Response |
+
+*Greenfield:* endpoints được infer từ BDD scenarios — thiết kế mới.
+*Reverse-document:* mô tả lại API đã tồn tại từ bảng "Existing API Contract" trong PRD. Ghi chú gaps nếu contract thực tế khác với BDD expectations.
+
+| Method | Path | Auth/Role | Request | Response |
+|--------|------|-----------|---------|----------|
+| {GET/POST/PUT/DELETE} | {/api/v1/...} | {Bearer / role} | `{ field: type }` | `{ field: type }` |
+
 ## §3. Data Model
-  Key entities and relationships.
+
+Key entities and relationships.
+
 ## §4. Service Flow
-  {Client} → Controller → {Facade/Service} → {Repository}
+
+{Client} → Controller → {Facade/Service} → {Repository}
+
 ## §5. Business Rules Implementation
-  | BR-ID | Rule | Implementation approach |
+
+| BR-ID | Rule | Implementation approach |
+|-------|------|-------------------------|
+| {UC-ID}-BR1 | {rule} | {approach} |
+
 ## §6. Error Handling
-  | Scenario | Exception | HTTP Status |
+
+| Scenario | Exception | HTTP Status |
+|----------|-----------|-------------|
+| {scenario} | {ExceptionClass} | {4xx/5xx} |
+
 ## §7. Database Changes
-  Migration scripts or schema changes.
+
+Migration scripts or schema changes.
+
 ## §8. Caching Strategy
-  What to cache, TTL, invalidation triggers.
+
+What to cache, TTL, invalidation triggers.
+
 ## §9. Cross-Service Dependencies
-  External calls, events produced/consumed.
+
+External calls, events produced/consumed.
 
 ## Changelog
 
@@ -128,6 +152,21 @@ Write `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md`:
 | 1 | {YYYY-MM-DD} | Initial generation from {UC-ID}.feature (BDD v{bdd_version}) |
 ```
 
+## Publish — share the contract (umbrella + shared spec repo)
+
+If `paths.tech_docs_dir` resolved **under `setup.spec_source`** (e.g. `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs`), the tech-doc was just written **inside the spec submodule**. It is the cross-team **API contract** — FE/App read it via their own `/sync`. Publish it so they can (2-layer commit):
+
+```bash
+cd {spec_source}
+git add specs/tech-docs/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md
+git commit -m "docs({UC-ID}): tech design / API contract"
+git push origin {spec_branch}          # the branch FE/App track in .gitmodules
+cd -
+git add {spec_source} && git commit -m "chore: bump spec pointer ({UC-ID} tech design)"
+```
+
+If `tech_docs_dir` is **local** — i.e. no `setup.spec_source` (single-repo, or a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module) — skip this; no cross-repo publish needed. Whenever `spec_source` is set, tech-docs route to the spec submodule and this publish step applies.
+
 ## Output
 
 {{include:steps/report-footer.md}}
@@ -137,5 +176,6 @@ Write `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md`:
 File: {paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md
 Next: /review-tech-docs {paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md
       ← SA/Lead review required before code generation
+      → if tech-docs live in the shared spec repo: commit + push to the spec submodule (see Publish above) so FE/App `/sync` can read the contract
       → after approved: /generate-code {paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-{slug}.feature
 ```

package/commands/learn.md

@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 
 **2. Route to service** — if active domain matches a key in `services`:
 - Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir`
-- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir`
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, the tech-design (API contract) is a cross-team artifact and must live in the shared spec repo (handled in step 4), so leave `tech_docs_dir` for step 4 to route — do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Store `active_service` = `services.{domain}.path`
 - Store `active_service_module` = `services.{domain}.module`
 - If service has its own `module` → use it as `active_module` (overrides `tech_stack.module`)
@@ -184,13 +184,14 @@ If `services` section is present:
 **4. Spec source auto-override** — if `setup.spec_source` is set AND the corresponding path was not already explicitly set in `paths:`:
 - Override `paths.prd_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/prd`
 - Override `paths.design_spec_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/design-spec`
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs` — **always when `spec_source` is set** (step 2 no longer pins tech-docs per-service in this case). The tech-design IS the cross-team API contract: BE authors it here, and FE/App read it from the same spec submodule at `/generate-code --phase=integration`. *(Per-service tech-docs only happen when there is no `spec_source` — a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module.)*
 - Override `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge`
 - Override `paths.business_dictionary` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
 - Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
 - Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
 
-> **Why under `spec_source`:** tester feedback (`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`) must land in the **shared spec repo** so PO/Dev see it when they `/sync`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default to `feedback/bug-reports` and `feedback/bdd-proposals` at repo root — still shared, same repo.
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, and tester feedback are all **cross-team artifacts** — they must live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same source via `/sync`. Tech-docs specifically: BE authors the tech-design (API contract), commits + pushes it into the spec submodule (2-layer commit), and FE/App pull it on their next `/sync` to wire the real API in `/generate-code --phase=integration`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default under the repo root — still shared, same repo.
 
 ---
 
@@ -214,7 +215,7 @@ When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-
 | `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
 
 **3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
-- Shell commands (`/run-tests`, `/generate-tests`) run **from within** `service_root`
+- Shell commands (`/dev-run-test`, `/dev-gen-test`) run **from within** `service_root`
 - File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
 
 **4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
@@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ active_module = tech_stack.module   (e.g. "java-spring", "react", "flutter")
 
 If `tech_stack.module` is blank or not recognized → set `platform_type = "unknown"` and flag as ⚠️ in the Step 7 recap.
 
-These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (generate-tests, debug, fix-bug, smoke-test).
+These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (dev-gen-test, debug, fix-bug, dev-smoke-test).
 
 ---
 
@@ -445,7 +446,7 @@ If `lessons_path` does not exist, create it with this header first:
 | code-gen | /generate-code output |
 | bdd | /generate-bdd output |
 | tech-docs | /generate-tech-docs output |
-| tests | /generate-tests output |
+| tests | /dev-gen-test output |
 | prd | /generate-prd, /refine-prd output |
 | general | every command |
 
@@ -512,13 +513,13 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 | /review-context (BDD)   | `/generate-tech-docs {UC-ID}` if APPROVED; regenerate if NEEDS_FIX |
 | /generate-tech-docs     | `/review-tech-docs {tech-design-file}`        |
 | /review-tech-docs       | `/generate-code {feature-file}` if APPROVED; fix doc if NEEDS_FIX |
-| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}` |
-| /generate-tests         | `/run-tests {UC-ID}`                          |
-| /run-tests (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
-| /run-tests (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
-| /review-code            | `/smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
-| /smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
-| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
+| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}` |
+| /dev-gen-test         | `/dev-run-test {UC-ID}`                          |
+| /dev-run-test (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
+| /dev-run-test (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
+| /review-code            | `/dev-smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
+| /dev-smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
+| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
 | /fix-bug                | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
 | /debug                  | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` if fix needed          |
 | /report-bug             | Send to dev (`/fix-bug {BUG-ID}`); if coverage gap → `/propose-scenario {UC-ID}` |

package/commands/propose-scenario.md

@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 
 **2. Route to service** — if active domain matches a key in `services`:
 - Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir`
-- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir`
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, the tech-design (API contract) is a cross-team artifact and must live in the shared spec repo (handled in step 4), so leave `tech_docs_dir` for step 4 to route — do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Store `active_service` = `services.{domain}.path`
 - Store `active_service_module` = `services.{domain}.module`
 - If service has its own `module` → use it as `active_module` (overrides `tech_stack.module`)
@@ -184,13 +184,14 @@ If `services` section is present:
 **4. Spec source auto-override** — if `setup.spec_source` is set AND the corresponding path was not already explicitly set in `paths:`:
 - Override `paths.prd_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/prd`
 - Override `paths.design_spec_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/design-spec`
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs` — **always when `spec_source` is set** (step 2 no longer pins tech-docs per-service in this case). The tech-design IS the cross-team API contract: BE authors it here, and FE/App read it from the same spec submodule at `/generate-code --phase=integration`. *(Per-service tech-docs only happen when there is no `spec_source` — a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module.)*
 - Override `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge`
 - Override `paths.business_dictionary` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
 - Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
 - Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
 
-> **Why under `spec_source`:** tester feedback (`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`) must land in the **shared spec repo** so PO/Dev see it when they `/sync`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default to `feedback/bug-reports` and `feedback/bdd-proposals` at repo root — still shared, same repo.
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, and tester feedback are all **cross-team artifacts** — they must live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same source via `/sync`. Tech-docs specifically: BE authors the tech-design (API contract), commits + pushes it into the spec submodule (2-layer commit), and FE/App pull it on their next `/sync` to wire the real API in `/generate-code --phase=integration`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default under the repo root — still shared, same repo.
 
 ---
 
@@ -214,7 +215,7 @@ When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-
 | `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
 
 **3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
-- Shell commands (`/run-tests`, `/generate-tests`) run **from within** `service_root`
+- Shell commands (`/dev-run-test`, `/dev-gen-test`) run **from within** `service_root`
 - File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
 
 **4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
@@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ active_module = tech_stack.module   (e.g. "java-spring", "react", "flutter")
 
 If `tech_stack.module` is blank or not recognized → set `platform_type = "unknown"` and flag as ⚠️ in the Step 7 recap.
 
-These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (generate-tests, debug, fix-bug, smoke-test).
+These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (dev-gen-test, debug, fix-bug, dev-smoke-test).
 
 ---
 
@@ -469,13 +470,13 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 | /review-context (BDD)   | `/generate-tech-docs {UC-ID}` if APPROVED; regenerate if NEEDS_FIX |
 | /generate-tech-docs     | `/review-tech-docs {tech-design-file}`        |
 | /review-tech-docs       | `/generate-code {feature-file}` if APPROVED; fix doc if NEEDS_FIX |
-| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}` |
-| /generate-tests         | `/run-tests {UC-ID}`                          |
-| /run-tests (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
-| /run-tests (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
-| /review-code            | `/smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
-| /smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
-| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
+| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}` |
+| /dev-gen-test         | `/dev-run-test {UC-ID}`                          |
+| /dev-run-test (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
+| /dev-run-test (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
+| /review-code            | `/dev-smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
+| /dev-smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
+| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
 | /fix-bug                | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
 | /debug                  | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` if fix needed          |
 | /report-bug             | Send to dev (`/fix-bug {BUG-ID}`); if coverage gap → `/propose-scenario {UC-ID}` |
@@ -510,7 +511,7 @@ Proposed scenario (DRAFT — pending PO/Dev review):
 For PO/Dev to promote:
   [ ] AC mapping correct? (or update PRD if requirement is actually new)
   [ ] Add scenario to {bdd_path} (edit, or re-run /generate-bdd if PRD changed)
-  [ ] Then: /generate-code {UC-ID} + /generate-tests {UC-ID}
+  [ ] Then: /generate-code {UC-ID} + /dev-gen-test {UC-ID}
 
 Handoff : {✅ committed + pushed to spec repo | ⚠️ run git commands above / open a PR}
 

package/commands/propose-scenario.tmpl

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Proposed scenario (DRAFT — pending PO/Dev review):
 For PO/Dev to promote:
   [ ] AC mapping correct? (or update PRD if requirement is actually new)
   [ ] Add scenario to {bdd_path} (edit, or re-run /generate-bdd if PRD changed)
-  [ ] Then: /generate-code {UC-ID} + /generate-tests {UC-ID}
+  [ ] Then: /generate-code {UC-ID} + /dev-gen-test {UC-ID}
 
 Handoff : {✅ committed + pushed to spec repo | ⚠️ run git commands above / open a PR}