@anhth2/spec-driven-dev-plugin 0.8.0 → 0.9.1

package/commands/generate-prd.tmpl

@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ Write `{paths.prd_dir}/{domain}/{TICKET-ID}-{slug}.md` using the structure below
 | **Domain**    | {domain}                         |
 | **Created**   | {YYYY-MM-DD}                     |
 | **Updated**   | {YYYY-MM-DD}                     |
+| **API Source** | *(bỏ trống nếu greenfield — thêm `existing` nếu API đã tồn tại trên hệ thống)* |
 
 ---
 
@@ -97,13 +98,14 @@ Write `{paths.prd_dir}/{domain}/{TICKET-ID}-{slug}.md` using the structure below
 
 ## a. User Story
 
-As a {User role}
-I want to {User goal}
-So that {Business value}
+- **As a** {User role}
+- **I want to** {User goal}
+- **So that** {Business value}
 
 ## b. Scope
 
-In Scope
+**In Scope**
+
 - {Function 1}
 - {Function 2}
 
@@ -111,24 +113,36 @@ In Scope
 
 # 2. Acceptance Criteria
 
-AC1: {Acceptance criterion — testable, observable, no UI details}
-AC2: {Acceptance criterion}
+- **AC1:** {Acceptance criterion — testable, observable, no UI details}
+- **AC2:** {Acceptance criterion}
 
 ---
 
 # 3. Use Case
 
 #### {TICKET-ID}-UC1: {Use Case Name}
-Actor: {User performing the action}
-Description: {Business scenario description — 1 sentence}
-Pre-condition: {Condition that must be true BEFORE use case begins}
-Post-condition: {State / result AFTER use case completes}
 
-Business Rule
-| ID                      | Business Rule                        | Business Logic                            |
-|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
-| {TICKET-ID}-UC1-BR1     | {Rule — WHAT the system must do}    | - Logic 1<br/>- Logic 2<br/>- Logic 3    |
-| {TICKET-ID}-UC1-BR2     | {Rule}                               | - Logic                                  |
+- **Actor:** {User performing the action}
+- **Description:** {Business scenario description — 1 sentence}
+- **Pre-condition:** {Condition that must be true BEFORE use case begins}
+- **Post-condition:** {State / result AFTER use case completes}
+
+**Business Rule**
+
+| ID | Business Rule |
+|----|---------------|
+| {TICKET-ID}-UC1-BR1 | {Rule — WHAT the system must do} |
+| {TICKET-ID}-UC1-BR2 | {Rule} |
+
+**Business Logic**
+
+**{TICKET-ID}-UC1-BR1:**
+- Logic 1
+- Logic 2
+- Logic 3
+
+**{TICKET-ID}-UC1-BR2:**
+- Logic
 
 ---
 
@@ -150,11 +164,16 @@ flowchart TD
 
 **Screen 1: {Screen Name}**
 
-| Component      | Details                                                         |
-|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
-| **Screen**     | {Screen name}                                                   |
-| **Components** | - {Component 1}<br/>- {Component 2}<br/>- {Component 3}        |
-| **Actions**    | - {Action 1} → {Result}<br/>- {Action 2} → {Result}           |
+**Screen:** {Screen name}
+
+**Components:**
+- {Component 1}
+- {Component 2}
+- {Component 3}
+
+**Actions:**
+- {Action 1} → {Result}
+- {Action 2} → {Result}
 
 ---
 
@@ -168,6 +187,23 @@ flowchart TD
 
 - {[TICKET-ID](./TICKET-ID-slug.md) — relationship description}
 
+## Existing API Contract *(chỉ điền khi API Source = existing)*
+
+> API đã tồn tại trên hệ thống. PO ghi lại contract để BDD generation dùng trực tiếp —
+> không cần tổng hợp từ FE/App BDD, không cần T7 sign-off gate.
+
+| Method | Path | Auth | Request | Response |
+|--------|------|------|---------|----------|
+| {GET/POST/PUT/DELETE} | {/api/v1/path} | {Bearer / none} | `{ field: type }` | `{ field: type }` |
+
+**Error responses:**
+
+| HTTP Status | Error Code | Khi nào xảy ra |
+|-------------|------------|----------------|
+| {4xx/5xx} | {ERR_CODE} | {condition} |
+
+---
+
 ## AI Assumptions
 
 > Assumptions AI made when information was incomplete. Needs PO review and confirmation.
@@ -187,6 +223,7 @@ flowchart TD
 - [ ] No banned terms (if dictionary exists)
 - [ ] User Flow includes error path / exception path
 - [ ] Wireframe covers all screens related to Use Cases
+- [ ] **Định dạng (readability)**: User Story / AC / các field của UC (Actor, Description, Pre/Post-condition) viết dạng bullet `- **Label:** …` — mỗi ý MỘT dòng, KHÔNG viết các dòng liền nhau (sẽ bị dồn thành 1 đoạn khi render); có một dòng trống trước và sau mỗi bảng
 
 ## Changelog Section (append at end of PRD)
 

package/commands/generate-spec-manifest.md

@@ -183,6 +183,37 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Override `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge`
 - Override `paths.business_dictionary` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
+- Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
+- Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
+
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** tester feedback (`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`) must land in the **shared spec repo** so PO/Dev see it when they `/sync`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default to `feedback/bug-reports` and `feedback/bdd-proposals` at repo root — still shared, same repo.
+
+---
+
+## Step 1.6 — [SERVICE CONVENTIONS] Load service-specific conventions (umbrella mode)
+
+*Skip this step entirely if `active_service` is `"unresolved"` or context is single-service mode.*
+
+When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-service/`):
+
+**1. Locate service config** — try in priority order:
+- `{active_service}/.agent/project-context.yaml`
+- `{active_service}/project-context.yaml`
+
+**2. If found, override with service-specific values:**
+
+| Variable | Source |
+|----------|--------|
+| `conventions.test_command` | service's `conventions.test_command` |
+| `conventions.build_command` | service's `conventions.build_command` |
+| `paths.trace_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` — default: `{active_service}/.trace` |
+| `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
+
+**3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
+- Shell commands (`/run-tests`, `/generate-tests`) run **from within** `service_root`
+- File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
+
+**4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
 
 ---
 
@@ -276,6 +307,25 @@ These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source
 
 ---
 
+## Step 6.7 — [GUARDRAILS] Load Project Lessons (conditional)
+
+*Accumulated mistakes the AI must not repeat in this project. These are added over time via `/learn`
+or accepted during `/review-code`, `/fix-bug`, `/debug`.*
+
+Resolve the lessons file path:
+- Use `paths.lessons_file` if set (may be service-overridden in umbrella mode, Step 1.6)
+- Else default `specs/domain-knowledge/lessons-learned.md`
+- In umbrella/service mode (when `service_root` is set), if `paths.lessons_file` is unset, default to `{service_root}/.agent/project-lessons.md`
+
+If the file exists, read it and store ALL lessons as **ACTIVE GUARDRAILS** for the session:
+- Treat each lesson's **Rule** as a hard constraint — same priority as CLAUDE.md coding standards (Step 3).
+- Before generating or modifying any artifact (PRD, BDD, tech-doc, code, test), check the output against every lesson whose `category` matches the current command AND whose `scope` matches the target (domain / file).
+- If a generated output would violate a lesson → correct it **before** presenting, and note which lesson (`L-NNN`) was applied.
+
+If the file does not exist → skip silently (no lessons captured yet).
+
+---
+
 ## Step 7 — [RECAP] Working Memory Recap (anti-lost-in-middle)
 
 After loading all context, synthesize and output a compact summary block.
@@ -291,7 +341,9 @@ Layers    : {layer order from CLAUDE.md §2, e.g., Controller → Facade → Ser
 Ticket    : {ticket_prefix}-
 Dict      : {loaded — N canonical terms, M banned terms | missing}
 Entities  : {loaded — EntityA, EntityB, EntityC | missing}
+Lessons   : {loaded — N guardrails | none yet}
 Service   : {active_service} ({active_service_module}) | single-service
+Svc Root  : {service_root} — conventions + trace_dir loaded from service config | —
 Status    : {FULL | PARTIAL — missing: CLAUDE.md / business-dict / core-entities | MINIMAL}
 ```
 
@@ -485,6 +537,11 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 | /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
 | /fix-bug                | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
 | /debug                  | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` if fix needed          |
+| /report-bug             | Send to dev (`/fix-bug {BUG-ID}`); if coverage gap → `/propose-scenario {UC-ID}` |
+| /propose-scenario       | Notify PO/Dev to review the proposal in `feedback/bdd-proposals/` |
+| /learn                  | Continue working — lesson applies on next command |
+| /sync                   | `/validate-traces` for full coverage; act on any `📥 tester feedback` surfaced |
+| /update-framework       | Review `git diff .agent/`, commit; `/sync` for project content |
 
 Format the footer as:
 ```

package/commands/generate-tech-docs.md

@@ -199,6 +199,37 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Override `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge`
 - Override `paths.business_dictionary` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
+- Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
+- Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
+
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** tester feedback (`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`) must land in the **shared spec repo** so PO/Dev see it when they `/sync`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default to `feedback/bug-reports` and `feedback/bdd-proposals` at repo root — still shared, same repo.
+
+---
+
+## Step 1.6 — [SERVICE CONVENTIONS] Load service-specific conventions (umbrella mode)
+
+*Skip this step entirely if `active_service` is `"unresolved"` or context is single-service mode.*
+
+When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-service/`):
+
+**1. Locate service config** — try in priority order:
+- `{active_service}/.agent/project-context.yaml`
+- `{active_service}/project-context.yaml`
+
+**2. If found, override with service-specific values:**
+
+| Variable | Source |
+|----------|--------|
+| `conventions.test_command` | service's `conventions.test_command` |
+| `conventions.build_command` | service's `conventions.build_command` |
+| `paths.trace_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` — default: `{active_service}/.trace` |
+| `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
+
+**3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
+- Shell commands (`/run-tests`, `/generate-tests`) run **from within** `service_root`
+- File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
+
+**4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
 
 ---
 
@@ -292,6 +323,25 @@ These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source
 
 ---
 
+## Step 6.7 — [GUARDRAILS] Load Project Lessons (conditional)
+
+*Accumulated mistakes the AI must not repeat in this project. These are added over time via `/learn`
+or accepted during `/review-code`, `/fix-bug`, `/debug`.*
+
+Resolve the lessons file path:
+- Use `paths.lessons_file` if set (may be service-overridden in umbrella mode, Step 1.6)
+- Else default `specs/domain-knowledge/lessons-learned.md`
+- In umbrella/service mode (when `service_root` is set), if `paths.lessons_file` is unset, default to `{service_root}/.agent/project-lessons.md`
+
+If the file exists, read it and store ALL lessons as **ACTIVE GUARDRAILS** for the session:
+- Treat each lesson's **Rule** as a hard constraint — same priority as CLAUDE.md coding standards (Step 3).
+- Before generating or modifying any artifact (PRD, BDD, tech-doc, code, test), check the output against every lesson whose `category` matches the current command AND whose `scope` matches the target (domain / file).
+- If a generated output would violate a lesson → correct it **before** presenting, and note which lesson (`L-NNN`) was applied.
+
+If the file does not exist → skip silently (no lessons captured yet).
+
+---
+
 ## Step 7 — [RECAP] Working Memory Recap (anti-lost-in-middle)
 
 After loading all context, synthesize and output a compact summary block.
@@ -307,7 +357,9 @@ Layers    : {layer order from CLAUDE.md §2, e.g., Controller → Facade → Ser
 Ticket    : {ticket_prefix}-
 Dict      : {loaded — N canonical terms, M banned terms | missing}
 Entities  : {loaded — EntityA, EntityB, EntityC | missing}
+Lessons   : {loaded — N guardrails | none yet}
 Service   : {active_service} ({active_service_module}) | single-service
+Svc Root  : {service_root} — conventions + trace_dir loaded from service config | —
 Status    : {FULL | PARTIAL — missing: CLAUDE.md / business-dict / core-entities | MINIMAL}
 ```
 
@@ -329,6 +381,22 @@ After completing all steps, you have loaded:
 Proceed to the next step of the calling command.
 
 
+---
+
+## Brownfield Check
+
+Read the source `.feature` file header for `@trace.api_source`.
+Also check the source PRD Metadata table for `| **API Source** | existing |`.
+
+| Value | Mode |
+|-------|------|
+| `existing` | **Reverse-document** — API đã tồn tại; mô tả lại as-is, note gaps, không cần design mới |
+| absent / other | **Greenfield** — thiết kế API từ đầu |
+
+Store `active_mode = {reverse-document | greenfield}`.
+
+If `active_mode = reverse-document` → load bảng "Existing API Contract" từ PRD làm input cho §2.
+
 ---
 
 ## CHECKPOINT — Tech Design Plan
@@ -341,13 +409,14 @@ Tech Design Plan — {UC-ID}
 UC       : {UC-ID} — {feature title}
 Service  : {trace.service}
 Module   : {trace.module}
+Mode     : {Reverse-document (API đã tồn tại) | Greenfield (thiết kế mới)}
 Scenarios: {N} scenarios
 BDD ver  : {trace.bdd_version}
 Output   : {paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md
 
 Sections to generate:
   §1 Overview
-  §2 API Endpoints   ({N} endpoints inferred from scenarios)
+  §2 API Endpoints   ({Reverse-document: mô tả lại từ PRD contract | Greenfield: infer từ scenarios})
   §3 Data Model      ({entities from core-entities.md relevant to this UC})
   §4 Service Flow
   §5 Business Rules  ({N} BRs from feature header)
@@ -379,11 +448,15 @@ Write `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md`:
 @trace.bdd_version: {read @trace.bdd_version from the .feature file header}
 @trace.revision: 1
 @trace.status: draft
+@trace.api_source: {existing | —}
 @trace.generated_at: {YYYY-MM-DD}
 ---
 
 ## §1. Overview
 ## §2. API Endpoints
+  *Greenfield:* endpoints được infer từ BDD scenarios — thiết kế mới.
+  *Reverse-document:* mô tả lại API đã tồn tại từ bảng "Existing API Contract" trong PRD.
+    Ghi chú gaps nếu contract thực tế khác với BDD expectations.
   | Method | Path | Auth/Role | Request | Response |
 ## §3. Data Model
   Key entities and relationships.
@@ -456,6 +529,11 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 | /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
 | /fix-bug                | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
 | /debug                  | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` if fix needed          |
+| /report-bug             | Send to dev (`/fix-bug {BUG-ID}`); if coverage gap → `/propose-scenario {UC-ID}` |
+| /propose-scenario       | Notify PO/Dev to review the proposal in `feedback/bdd-proposals/` |
+| /learn                  | Continue working — lesson applies on next command |
+| /sync                   | `/validate-traces` for full coverage; act on any `📥 tester feedback` surfaced |
+| /update-framework       | Review `git diff .agent/`, commit; `/sync` for project content |
 
 Format the footer as:
 ```

package/commands/generate-tech-docs.tmpl

@@ -31,6 +31,22 @@
 
 ---
 
+## Brownfield Check
+
+Read the source `.feature` file header for `@trace.api_source`.
+Also check the source PRD Metadata table for `| **API Source** | existing |`.
+
+| Value | Mode |
+|-------|------|
+| `existing` | **Reverse-document** — API đã tồn tại; mô tả lại as-is, note gaps, không cần design mới |
+| absent / other | **Greenfield** — thiết kế API từ đầu |
+
+Store `active_mode = {reverse-document | greenfield}`.
+
+If `active_mode = reverse-document` → load bảng "Existing API Contract" từ PRD làm input cho §2.
+
+---
+
 ## CHECKPOINT — Tech Design Plan
 
 Before generating, scan the feature file for scenario count, referenced BRs, and entities. Display and wait for Y:
@@ -41,13 +57,14 @@ Tech Design Plan — {UC-ID}
 UC       : {UC-ID} — {feature title}
 Service  : {trace.service}
 Module   : {trace.module}
+Mode     : {Reverse-document (API đã tồn tại) | Greenfield (thiết kế mới)}
 Scenarios: {N} scenarios
 BDD ver  : {trace.bdd_version}
 Output   : {paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md
 
 Sections to generate:
   §1 Overview
-  §2 API Endpoints   ({N} endpoints inferred from scenarios)
+  §2 API Endpoints   ({Reverse-document: mô tả lại từ PRD contract | Greenfield: infer từ scenarios})
   §3 Data Model      ({entities from core-entities.md relevant to this UC})
   §4 Service Flow
   §5 Business Rules  ({N} BRs from feature header)
@@ -79,11 +96,15 @@ Write `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design.md`:
 @trace.bdd_version: {read @trace.bdd_version from the .feature file header}
 @trace.revision: 1
 @trace.status: draft
+@trace.api_source: {existing | —}
 @trace.generated_at: {YYYY-MM-DD}
 ---
 
 ## §1. Overview
 ## §2. API Endpoints
+  *Greenfield:* endpoints được infer từ BDD scenarios — thiết kế mới.
+  *Reverse-document:* mô tả lại API đã tồn tại từ bảng "Existing API Contract" trong PRD.
+    Ghi chú gaps nếu contract thực tế khác với BDD expectations.
   | Method | Path | Auth/Role | Request | Response |
 ## §3. Data Model
   Key entities and relationships.

package/commands/generate-tests.md

@@ -178,6 +178,37 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Override `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge`
 - Override `paths.business_dictionary` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
+- Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
+- Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
+
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** tester feedback (`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`) must land in the **shared spec repo** so PO/Dev see it when they `/sync`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default to `feedback/bug-reports` and `feedback/bdd-proposals` at repo root — still shared, same repo.
+
+---
+
+## Step 1.6 — [SERVICE CONVENTIONS] Load service-specific conventions (umbrella mode)
+
+*Skip this step entirely if `active_service` is `"unresolved"` or context is single-service mode.*
+
+When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-service/`):
+
+**1. Locate service config** — try in priority order:
+- `{active_service}/.agent/project-context.yaml`
+- `{active_service}/project-context.yaml`
+
+**2. If found, override with service-specific values:**
+
+| Variable | Source |
+|----------|--------|
+| `conventions.test_command` | service's `conventions.test_command` |
+| `conventions.build_command` | service's `conventions.build_command` |
+| `paths.trace_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` — default: `{active_service}/.trace` |
+| `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
+
+**3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
+- Shell commands (`/run-tests`, `/generate-tests`) run **from within** `service_root`
+- File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
+
+**4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
 
 ---
 
@@ -271,6 +302,25 @@ These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source
 
 ---
 
+## Step 6.7 — [GUARDRAILS] Load Project Lessons (conditional)
+
+*Accumulated mistakes the AI must not repeat in this project. These are added over time via `/learn`
+or accepted during `/review-code`, `/fix-bug`, `/debug`.*
+
+Resolve the lessons file path:
+- Use `paths.lessons_file` if set (may be service-overridden in umbrella mode, Step 1.6)
+- Else default `specs/domain-knowledge/lessons-learned.md`
+- In umbrella/service mode (when `service_root` is set), if `paths.lessons_file` is unset, default to `{service_root}/.agent/project-lessons.md`
+
+If the file exists, read it and store ALL lessons as **ACTIVE GUARDRAILS** for the session:
+- Treat each lesson's **Rule** as a hard constraint — same priority as CLAUDE.md coding standards (Step 3).
+- Before generating or modifying any artifact (PRD, BDD, tech-doc, code, test), check the output against every lesson whose `category` matches the current command AND whose `scope` matches the target (domain / file).
+- If a generated output would violate a lesson → correct it **before** presenting, and note which lesson (`L-NNN`) was applied.
+
+If the file does not exist → skip silently (no lessons captured yet).
+
+---
+
 ## Step 7 — [RECAP] Working Memory Recap (anti-lost-in-middle)
 
 After loading all context, synthesize and output a compact summary block.
@@ -286,7 +336,9 @@ Layers    : {layer order from CLAUDE.md §2, e.g., Controller → Facade → Ser
 Ticket    : {ticket_prefix}-
 Dict      : {loaded — N canonical terms, M banned terms | missing}
 Entities  : {loaded — EntityA, EntityB, EntityC | missing}
+Lessons   : {loaded — N guardrails | none yet}
 Service   : {active_service} ({active_service_module}) | single-service
+Svc Root  : {service_root} — conventions + trace_dir loaded from service config | —
 Status    : {FULL | PARTIAL — missing: CLAUDE.md / business-dict / core-entities | MINIMAL}
 ```
 
@@ -812,6 +864,11 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 | /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/generate-tests {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
 | /fix-bug                | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
 | /debug                  | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` if fix needed          |
+| /report-bug             | Send to dev (`/fix-bug {BUG-ID}`); if coverage gap → `/propose-scenario {UC-ID}` |
+| /propose-scenario       | Notify PO/Dev to review the proposal in `feedback/bdd-proposals/` |
+| /learn                  | Continue working — lesson applies on next command |
+| /sync                   | `/validate-traces` for full coverage; act on any `📥 tester feedback` surfaced |
+| /update-framework       | Review `git diff .agent/`, commit; `/sync` for project content |
 
 Format the footer as:
 ```