@anhth2/spec-driven-dev-plugin 0.11.0 → 0.14.0

package/commands/qc-run-test.md

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Wait for explicit "Y" or "N" from the user before continuing.
 - "N" → stop and ask what the user wants to change.
 
 
-*Note: For this command, the target in Step 1 is a UC-ID. Read the reviewed `.Test.md` from `{paths.refinement_dir}/qc/{UC-ID}/test-cases/`. This command uses the **qc-playwright** stack module (`.agent/modules/qc-playwright/stack-profile.yaml`) — Python + pytest-playwright + Page Object — independent of the dev implementation module.*
+*Note: For this command, the target in Step 1 is a UC-ID. Read the reviewed `.Test.md` from `{paths.qc_dir}/{UC-ID}/test-cases/`. This command uses the **qc-playwright** stack module (`.agent/modules/qc-playwright/stack-profile.yaml`) — Python + pytest-playwright + Page Object — independent of the dev implementation module.*
 
 ## Context
 # Context Loader — Load All Project Context
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ Read `.agent/project-context.yaml`. Extract and store:
 - `paths.specs_dir` → BDD specs root
 - `paths.prd_dir` → PRD documents root
 - `paths.refinement_dir` → findings/review output dir
+- `paths.qc_dir` → QC automation artifacts root (visible top-level, one subfolder per UC: `{qc_dir}/{UC-ID}/`)
+- `paths.qc_skills_dir` → where qc-* commands load QC skills from (default bundled `.agent/skills/qc`; override to the QC team's own repo/submodule so framework upgrade won't overwrite them)
 - `paths.product_definitions_dir` → product definitions root
 - `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → domain knowledge root
 - `paths.business_dictionary` → path to business-dictionary.md
@@ -145,6 +147,8 @@ If `paths` section is absent, use these defaults:
 - `specs_dir` = `specs/bdd`
 - `prd_dir` = `specs/prd`
 - `refinement_dir` = `.agent/review`
+- `qc_dir` = `docs`
+- `qc_skills_dir` = `.agent/skills/qc`
 - `product_definitions_dir` = `specs/product-definition`
 - `domain_knowledge_dir` = `specs/domain-knowledge`
 - `business_dictionary` = `specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
@@ -170,7 +174,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - If `$ARGUMENTS` contains a path, extract the segment after `prd_dir`
 
 **2. Route to service** — if active domain matches a key in `services`:
-- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir`
+- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, ALL BDD (web/app/**system**) is a shared cross-team artifact → leave `specs_dir` for step 4 to route to the spec repo; do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, the tech-design (API contract) is a cross-team artifact and must live in the shared spec repo (handled in step 4), so leave `tech_docs_dir` for step 4 to route — do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Store `active_service` = `services.{domain}.path`
 - Store `active_service_module` = `services.{domain}.module`
@@ -181,6 +185,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Set `active_service = unresolved`
 
 **4. Spec source auto-override** — if `setup.spec_source` is set AND the corresponding path was not already explicitly set in `paths:`:
+- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/bdd` — **always when `spec_source` is set.** All BDD (web/app/**system**) lives in the shared spec repo so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same scenarios; the FE tech-design gate + `/generate-code --phase=ui`/`--phase=integration` resolve the `system/` BDD here. *(Per-service `specs/bdd` only when there is no `spec_source`.)*
 - Override `paths.prd_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/prd`
 - Override `paths.design_spec_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/design-spec`
 - Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs` — **always when `spec_source` is set** (step 2 no longer pins tech-docs per-service in this case). The tech-design IS the cross-team API contract: BE authors it here, and FE/App read it from the same spec submodule at `/generate-code --phase=integration`. *(Per-service tech-docs only happen when there is no `spec_source` — a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module.)*
@@ -189,8 +194,10 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
 - Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
 - Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
+- Override `paths.prd_change_requests_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/prd-change-requests`
+- Override `paths.trace_dir` → `{spec_source}/.trace` — **always when `spec_source` is set.** Trace TSVs are consolidated in the spec repo (single authoritative location, no per-service split) so the PM/PO has one place to manage status. Code-side commands (`/generate-code`, `/dev-run-test`, `/qc-run-test`) run from `service_root` but **write their trace row into `{spec_source}/.trace`** — like they already push `feedback/` there. *(Per-service `.trace` only when there is no `spec_source`.)*
 
-> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, and tester feedback are all **cross-team artifacts** — they must live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same source via `/sync`. Tech-docs specifically: BE authors the tech-design (API contract), commits + pushes it into the spec submodule (2-layer commit), and FE/App pull it on their next `/sync` to wire the real API in `/generate-code --phase=integration`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default under the repo root — still shared, same repo.
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, **all BDD (web/app/system)**, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, tester feedback, **and the `.trace/` coverage state** are all **cross-team artifacts** — they live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) and the PM read one source via `/sync`. The service submodule holds only **code** (+ build/test tooling). `.trace/` and `feedback/` are the dev/QC **write areas** in the spec repo (the PRD/BDD/design-spec/tech-docs there stay read-only for dev/QC — only PO edits those). In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), everything defaults under the repo root — still one repo.
 
 ---
 
@@ -210,12 +217,12 @@ When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-
 |----------|--------|
 | `conventions.test_command` | service's `conventions.test_command` |
 | `conventions.build_command` | service's `conventions.build_command` |
-| `paths.trace_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` — default: `{active_service}/.trace` |
-| `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
+| `paths.trace_dir` | **If `spec_source` is set → keep the Step 4 spec-repo route (`{spec_source}/.trace`); ignore any service-level `trace_dir`.** Only when there is no `spec_source`: `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` (default `{active_service}/.trace`). |
+| `paths.specs_dir` | **If `spec_source` is set → keep the Step 4 spec-repo route (`{spec_source}/specs/bdd`); ignore any service-level `specs_dir`** (BDD is cross-team, never per-service in this mode). Only when there is no `spec_source`: `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` if set, else the Step 1.5 override. |
 
 **3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
 - Shell commands (`/dev-run-test`, `/dev-gen-test`) run **from within** `service_root`
-- File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
+- **Source/test files** are written relative to `service_root`; **trace TSVs** are written to `{paths.trace_dir}` (the spec repo when `spec_source` is set — a cross-repo write, committed/pushed to the spec submodule like `feedback/`).
 
 **4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
 
@@ -402,12 +409,13 @@ pytest-playwright scripts + Page Objects, run them, and report the result per sc
 Stack rules (MANDATORY — from `modules/qc-playwright/stack-profile.yaml`):
 - Markdown-first: never generate Python without a reviewed `.Test.md`.
 - Page Object extends slim `BasePage`, 3 layers: locators `_x()`, actions `verb_noun()`, assertions `assert_x()` using `expect()`.
+- **Locators from the test-id contract (no runtime scan).** Read the FE tech-design §2b *Test Selectors* table at `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design-{platform}.md` (if present) and build each Page Object locator from its stable test-id — web `get_by_test_id("...")`, RN `testID`, Flutter `Key`/`Semantics`, native `accessibilityIdentifier`. **Prefer the map; fall back** to role/label/text/CSS (the slower scan) only for an actionable element that has **no** test-id in §2b — and note it so the gap can be added to the tech-design.
 - pytest-playwright fixtures; each test independent; group by (role, account) so auth never interleaves.
 - No hard-coded URL/cred/timeout (use `Env.*` / `CONFIG[...]`); no `time.sleep()`; no Allure.
 - Cover **100%** of TCs in the file — every TC ends Pass/Fail/Skip (none left Draft).
 - Classify each FAIL: script-bug (fix selector/logic) vs product-gap (keep FAIL + evidence, never fake-pass).
 
-## Skills — pick the layer, load ONE file (`skills/qc/qa-runner/`)
+## Skills — pick the layer, load ONE file (`{paths.qc_skills_dir}/qa-runner/`)
 
 `functional/{gui-screen,gui-feature,api}.md`, `integration.md`, `e2e.md`,
 `non-functional.md`, `exploratory/session.md`.
@@ -425,12 +433,18 @@ def test_TC_<FEATURE>_001_...(...): ...
 ## Write Trace State — qc_status (OFFICIAL QC result)
 
 After the run, update `{paths.trace_dir}/{UC-ID}.tsv` — for each scenario row (matched by
-`sc_id` via its tests' `@trace.verifies={UC-ID}-SC{N}` tag):
+`sc_id` via its tests' `@trace.verifies={UC-ID}-SC{N}` tag). *(Umbrella + `spec_source`: `trace_dir` is `{spec_source}/.trace` — write the `qc_status` update into the **spec repo** and commit/push the spec submodule, same as `feedback/`.)*
 
 | Column | Value |
 |--------|-------|
 | `qc_status` | `pass` if all QC tests for this SC passed · `fail` if any failed · `skip` if all skipped/xfail · `not_run` if no QC test covers it |
 | `qc_run_at` | today `YYYY-MM-DD` |
+| `qc_owner` | **who the SC is waiting on** (the PM/PO "pending" view): `dev` if FAIL = product-gap (real defect → dev fixes) · `po` if `skip`/`not_run` because an **open `DOC_GAPS` 🔴 Blocker** prevents testing (PO must clarify PRD/BDD) · `—` if `pass`, or FAIL = script-bug (QC's own to fix — transient) |
+| `qc_blocked_by` | linked artifact: `GAP-{id}` when blocked by a spec gap (set here) · `BUG-{id}` once `/report-bug` is filed for the product-gap (backfilled by `/report-bug`) · `—` otherwise |
+
+Set `qc_owner`/`qc_blocked_by` together with `qc_status`. On `pass`, **clear** both to `—`.
+For a product-gap FAIL, set `qc_owner=dev` now; the `BUG-{id}` is backfilled into `qc_blocked_by`
+when QC runs the `/report-bug` that `/qc-report` prompts.
 
 Leave all other columns unchanged — **never** touch `dev_selftest`/`dev_selftest_at`
 (owned by `/dev-run-test`). `qc_status` (official QC) and `dev_selftest` (dev smoke) are
@@ -440,21 +454,29 @@ separate signals; both are orthogonal to `status` (OK/GAP/DRIFT/UNTRACKED = cove
 # Refresh Living Docs panel mirror *(local, umbrella mode)*
 
 *Skip entirely in single-service mode (no `services` and no `setup.spec_source`) — there
-the service `.trace/` IS the panel location, so nothing to mirror.*
+the repo's own `.trace/` IS the panel location, so nothing to mirror.*
 
-After updating the authoritative service TSV(s) at `{paths.trace_dir}`:
+After updating the authoritative TSV(s) at `{paths.trace_dir}`:
 
-1. Resolve `panel_mirror = ./.trace` at the **current workspace root** (where this command runs).
+**When `setup.spec_source` is set (consolidated trace — the common case):**
+`{paths.trace_dir}` resolves to `{spec_source}/.trace` — the single authoritative location.
+This command runs from `service_root`, so the write is **cross-repo into the spec submodule**;
+commit/push the spec submodule for the trace update (same as `feedback/`).
+1. Resolve `panel_mirror = ./.trace` at the **current workspace root**.
 2. If `panel_mirror` resolves to a different path than `{paths.trace_dir}`, copy each
-   just-updated `{UC-ID}.tsv` → `{panel_mirror}/{service-name}/{UC-ID}.tsv`
-   (create the dir; overwrite). Use `active_service` for `{service-name}`.
+   just-updated `{UC-ID}.tsv` → `{panel_mirror}/{UC-ID}.tsv` (create the dir; overwrite).
+   No per-service namespacing — there is one trace set; the owning service is carried in each
+   row's `@trace.service`.
+
+**Legacy (no `spec_source` — per-service trace):**
+Copy each just-updated `{UC-ID}.tsv` → `{panel_mirror}/{service-name}/{UC-ID}.tsv`
+(namespaced by `active_service`).
 
 This keeps the open workspace's Living Docs panel current **between syncs** — it is a
-**local convenience mirror only**. The *canonical* report in the spec module
-(`{spec_source}/.living-docs/`) and the merged `trace-report.json` are rebuilt by
-`/sync` or `/validate-traces` (those need every service's data, so a single per-UC
-command cannot produce them). For orchestrated commands, do this once in the orchestrator
-after all sub-agents return — not inside each sub-agent.
+**local convenience mirror only**. The merged `trace-report.json` (canonical, in
+`{spec_source}/.living-docs/`) is rebuilt by `/sync` or `/validate-traces`. For orchestrated
+commands, do this once in the orchestrator after all sub-agents return — not inside each
+sub-agent.
 
 
 ## Report
@@ -481,6 +503,36 @@ Output Artifacts:
 
 If no files were written (e.g., review or analysis commands) → write `Output Artifacts: none (read-only)`.
 
+## Pipeline Position
+
+Print a one-line map of the pipeline with the CURRENT command's phase marked `◀ bạn ở đây`,
+so the user always sees where this command sits in the end-to-end flow:
+
+```
+Discovery → PRD → [Design Spec] → BDD → Tech Design → Code → Dev Self-Check → QC → Trace Audit
+```
+
+Find the current command in this phase legend and mark **its** phase in the map above:
+
+| Phase | Commands |
+|-------|----------|
+| Discovery | `/define-product` |
+| PRD | `/generate-prd` · `/refine-prd` · `/review-context` (PRD) |
+| Design Spec | `/generate-design-spec` |
+| BDD | `/generate-bdd` · `/review-context` (BDD) |
+| Tech Design | `/generate-tech-docs` · `/map-testids` · `/review-tech-docs` |
+| Code | `/generate-code` · `/review-code` |
+| Dev Self-Check | `/dev-gen-test` · `/dev-run-test` · `/dev-smoke-test` |
+| QC | `/qc-analyze` · `/qc-plan` · `/qc-design-test` · `/qc-review` · `/qc-run-test` · `/qc-report` |
+| Trace Audit | `/validate-traces` |
+
+For a **review command**, also append the 3-step review loop with the current step marked, e.g.:
+`Vòng review: [① phân tích ◀] → ② Review Board → ③ --resume`.
+
+**Cross-cutting commands** (`/sync`, `/update-framework`, `/fix-bug`, `/debug`, `/learn`,
+`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`, `/generate-spec-manifest`) sit outside the linear pipeline —
+**omit the Pipeline line entirely** for these (do not force-fit them onto the map).
+
 ## Next Command Suggestion
 
 Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
@@ -522,10 +574,13 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 Format the footer as:
 ```
 ---
-Status : {badge}
+Status   : {badge}
 {Output Artifacts block}
-Next   : {suggested command with example arguments}
+Pipeline : Discovery → PRD → [BDD ◀ bạn ở đây] → Tech Design → Code → Dev Self-Check → QC → Trace Audit
+           (review cmd) Vòng review: [① phân tích ◀] → ② Review Board → ③ --resume
+Next     : {suggested command with example arguments}
 ```
+*(Omit the `Pipeline` line for cross-cutting commands listed above.)*
 
 
 ```

package/commands/qc-run-test.tmpl

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ ported_from: ai-automation-qc-base
 ## Gate
 {{include:steps/gate.md}}
 
-*Note: For this command, the target in Step 1 is a UC-ID. Read the reviewed `.Test.md` from `{paths.refinement_dir}/qc/{UC-ID}/test-cases/`. This command uses the **qc-playwright** stack module (`.agent/modules/qc-playwright/stack-profile.yaml`) — Python + pytest-playwright + Page Object — independent of the dev implementation module.*
+*Note: For this command, the target in Step 1 is a UC-ID. Read the reviewed `.Test.md` from `{paths.qc_dir}/{UC-ID}/test-cases/`. This command uses the **qc-playwright** stack module (`.agent/modules/qc-playwright/stack-profile.yaml`) — Python + pytest-playwright + Page Object — independent of the dev implementation module.*
 
 ## Context
 {{include:steps/context-loader.md}}
@@ -26,12 +26,13 @@ pytest-playwright scripts + Page Objects, run them, and report the result per sc
 Stack rules (MANDATORY — from `modules/qc-playwright/stack-profile.yaml`):
 - Markdown-first: never generate Python without a reviewed `.Test.md`.
 - Page Object extends slim `BasePage`, 3 layers: locators `_x()`, actions `verb_noun()`, assertions `assert_x()` using `expect()`.
+- **Locators from the test-id contract (no runtime scan).** Read the FE tech-design §2b *Test Selectors* table at `{paths.tech_docs_dir}/{domain}/{UC-ID}-tech-design-{platform}.md` (if present) and build each Page Object locator from its stable test-id — web `get_by_test_id("...")`, RN `testID`, Flutter `Key`/`Semantics`, native `accessibilityIdentifier`. **Prefer the map; fall back** to role/label/text/CSS (the slower scan) only for an actionable element that has **no** test-id in §2b — and note it so the gap can be added to the tech-design.
 - pytest-playwright fixtures; each test independent; group by (role, account) so auth never interleaves.
 - No hard-coded URL/cred/timeout (use `Env.*` / `CONFIG[...]`); no `time.sleep()`; no Allure.
 - Cover **100%** of TCs in the file — every TC ends Pass/Fail/Skip (none left Draft).
 - Classify each FAIL: script-bug (fix selector/logic) vs product-gap (keep FAIL + evidence, never fake-pass).
 
-## Skills — pick the layer, load ONE file (`skills/qc/qa-runner/`)
+## Skills — pick the layer, load ONE file (`{paths.qc_skills_dir}/qa-runner/`)
 
 `functional/{gui-screen,gui-feature,api}.md`, `integration.md`, `e2e.md`,
 `non-functional.md`, `exploratory/session.md`.
@@ -49,12 +50,18 @@ def test_TC_<FEATURE>_001_...(...): ...
 ## Write Trace State — qc_status (OFFICIAL QC result)
 
 After the run, update `{paths.trace_dir}/{UC-ID}.tsv` — for each scenario row (matched by
-`sc_id` via its tests' `@trace.verifies={UC-ID}-SC{N}` tag):
+`sc_id` via its tests' `@trace.verifies={UC-ID}-SC{N}` tag). *(Umbrella + `spec_source`: `trace_dir` is `{spec_source}/.trace` — write the `qc_status` update into the **spec repo** and commit/push the spec submodule, same as `feedback/`.)*
 
 | Column | Value |
 |--------|-------|
 | `qc_status` | `pass` if all QC tests for this SC passed · `fail` if any failed · `skip` if all skipped/xfail · `not_run` if no QC test covers it |
 | `qc_run_at` | today `YYYY-MM-DD` |
+| `qc_owner` | **who the SC is waiting on** (the PM/PO "pending" view): `dev` if FAIL = product-gap (real defect → dev fixes) · `po` if `skip`/`not_run` because an **open `DOC_GAPS` 🔴 Blocker** prevents testing (PO must clarify PRD/BDD) · `—` if `pass`, or FAIL = script-bug (QC's own to fix — transient) |
+| `qc_blocked_by` | linked artifact: `GAP-{id}` when blocked by a spec gap (set here) · `BUG-{id}` once `/report-bug` is filed for the product-gap (backfilled by `/report-bug`) · `—` otherwise |
+
+Set `qc_owner`/`qc_blocked_by` together with `qc_status`. On `pass`, **clear** both to `—`.
+For a product-gap FAIL, set `qc_owner=dev` now; the `BUG-{id}` is backfilled into `qc_blocked_by`
+when QC runs the `/report-bug` that `/qc-report` prompts.
 
 Leave all other columns unchanged — **never** touch `dev_selftest`/`dev_selftest_at`
 (owned by `/dev-run-test`). `qc_status` (official QC) and `dev_selftest` (dev smoke) are

package/commands/refine-prd.md

@@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ Read `.agent/project-context.yaml`. Extract and store:
 - `paths.specs_dir` → BDD specs root
 - `paths.prd_dir` → PRD documents root
 - `paths.refinement_dir` → findings/review output dir
+- `paths.qc_dir` → QC automation artifacts root (visible top-level, one subfolder per UC: `{qc_dir}/{UC-ID}/`)
+- `paths.qc_skills_dir` → where qc-* commands load QC skills from (default bundled `.agent/skills/qc`; override to the QC team's own repo/submodule so framework upgrade won't overwrite them)
 - `paths.product_definitions_dir` → product definitions root
 - `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → domain knowledge root
 - `paths.business_dictionary` → path to business-dictionary.md
@@ -137,6 +139,8 @@ If `paths` section is absent, use these defaults:
 - `specs_dir` = `specs/bdd`
 - `prd_dir` = `specs/prd`
 - `refinement_dir` = `.agent/review`
+- `qc_dir` = `docs`
+- `qc_skills_dir` = `.agent/skills/qc`
 - `product_definitions_dir` = `specs/product-definition`
 - `domain_knowledge_dir` = `specs/domain-knowledge`
 - `business_dictionary` = `specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
@@ -162,7 +166,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - If `$ARGUMENTS` contains a path, extract the segment after `prd_dir`
 
 **2. Route to service** — if active domain matches a key in `services`:
-- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir`
+- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, ALL BDD (web/app/**system**) is a shared cross-team artifact → leave `specs_dir` for step 4 to route to the spec repo; do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, the tech-design (API contract) is a cross-team artifact and must live in the shared spec repo (handled in step 4), so leave `tech_docs_dir` for step 4 to route — do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Store `active_service` = `services.{domain}.path`
 - Store `active_service_module` = `services.{domain}.module`
@@ -173,6 +177,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Set `active_service = unresolved`
 
 **4. Spec source auto-override** — if `setup.spec_source` is set AND the corresponding path was not already explicitly set in `paths:`:
+- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/bdd` — **always when `spec_source` is set.** All BDD (web/app/**system**) lives in the shared spec repo so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same scenarios; the FE tech-design gate + `/generate-code --phase=ui`/`--phase=integration` resolve the `system/` BDD here. *(Per-service `specs/bdd` only when there is no `spec_source`.)*
 - Override `paths.prd_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/prd`
 - Override `paths.design_spec_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/design-spec`
 - Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs` — **always when `spec_source` is set** (step 2 no longer pins tech-docs per-service in this case). The tech-design IS the cross-team API contract: BE authors it here, and FE/App read it from the same spec submodule at `/generate-code --phase=integration`. *(Per-service tech-docs only happen when there is no `spec_source` — a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module.)*
@@ -181,8 +186,10 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
 - Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
 - Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
+- Override `paths.prd_change_requests_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/prd-change-requests`
+- Override `paths.trace_dir` → `{spec_source}/.trace` — **always when `spec_source` is set.** Trace TSVs are consolidated in the spec repo (single authoritative location, no per-service split) so the PM/PO has one place to manage status. Code-side commands (`/generate-code`, `/dev-run-test`, `/qc-run-test`) run from `service_root` but **write their trace row into `{spec_source}/.trace`** — like they already push `feedback/` there. *(Per-service `.trace` only when there is no `spec_source`.)*
 
-> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, and tester feedback are all **cross-team artifacts** — they must live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same source via `/sync`. Tech-docs specifically: BE authors the tech-design (API contract), commits + pushes it into the spec submodule (2-layer commit), and FE/App pull it on their next `/sync` to wire the real API in `/generate-code --phase=integration`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default under the repo root — still shared, same repo.
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, **all BDD (web/app/system)**, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, tester feedback, **and the `.trace/` coverage state** are all **cross-team artifacts** — they live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) and the PM read one source via `/sync`. The service submodule holds only **code** (+ build/test tooling). `.trace/` and `feedback/` are the dev/QC **write areas** in the spec repo (the PRD/BDD/design-spec/tech-docs there stay read-only for dev/QC — only PO edits those). In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), everything defaults under the repo root — still one repo.
 
 ---
 
@@ -202,12 +209,12 @@ When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-
 |----------|--------|
 | `conventions.test_command` | service's `conventions.test_command` |
 | `conventions.build_command` | service's `conventions.build_command` |
-| `paths.trace_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` — default: `{active_service}/.trace` |
-| `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
+| `paths.trace_dir` | **If `spec_source` is set → keep the Step 4 spec-repo route (`{spec_source}/.trace`); ignore any service-level `trace_dir`.** Only when there is no `spec_source`: `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` (default `{active_service}/.trace`). |
+| `paths.specs_dir` | **If `spec_source` is set → keep the Step 4 spec-repo route (`{spec_source}/specs/bdd`); ignore any service-level `specs_dir`** (BDD is cross-team, never per-service in this mode). Only when there is no `spec_source`: `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` if set, else the Step 1.5 override. |
 
 **3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
 - Shell commands (`/dev-run-test`, `/dev-gen-test`) run **from within** `service_root`
-- File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
+- **Source/test files** are written relative to `service_root`; **trace TSVs** are written to `{paths.trace_dir}` (the spec repo when `spec_source` is set — a cross-repo write, committed/pushed to the spec submodule like `feedback/`).
 
 **4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
 
@@ -607,6 +614,36 @@ Output Artifacts:
 
 If no files were written (e.g., review or analysis commands) → write `Output Artifacts: none (read-only)`.
 
+## Pipeline Position
+
+Print a one-line map of the pipeline with the CURRENT command's phase marked `◀ bạn ở đây`,
+so the user always sees where this command sits in the end-to-end flow:
+
+```
+Discovery → PRD → [Design Spec] → BDD → Tech Design → Code → Dev Self-Check → QC → Trace Audit
+```
+
+Find the current command in this phase legend and mark **its** phase in the map above:
+
+| Phase | Commands |
+|-------|----------|
+| Discovery | `/define-product` |
+| PRD | `/generate-prd` · `/refine-prd` · `/review-context` (PRD) |
+| Design Spec | `/generate-design-spec` |
+| BDD | `/generate-bdd` · `/review-context` (BDD) |
+| Tech Design | `/generate-tech-docs` · `/map-testids` · `/review-tech-docs` |
+| Code | `/generate-code` · `/review-code` |
+| Dev Self-Check | `/dev-gen-test` · `/dev-run-test` · `/dev-smoke-test` |
+| QC | `/qc-analyze` · `/qc-plan` · `/qc-design-test` · `/qc-review` · `/qc-run-test` · `/qc-report` |
+| Trace Audit | `/validate-traces` |
+
+For a **review command**, also append the 3-step review loop with the current step marked, e.g.:
+`Vòng review: [① phân tích ◀] → ② Review Board → ③ --resume`.
+
+**Cross-cutting commands** (`/sync`, `/update-framework`, `/fix-bug`, `/debug`, `/learn`,
+`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`, `/generate-spec-manifest`) sit outside the linear pipeline —
+**omit the Pipeline line entirely** for these (do not force-fit them onto the map).
+
 ## Next Command Suggestion
 
 Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
@@ -648,10 +685,13 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 Format the footer as:
 ```
 ---
-Status : {badge}
+Status   : {badge}
 {Output Artifacts block}
-Next   : {suggested command with example arguments}
+Pipeline : Discovery → PRD → [BDD ◀ bạn ở đây] → Tech Design → Code → Dev Self-Check → QC → Trace Audit
+           (review cmd) Vòng review: [① phân tích ◀] → ② Review Board → ③ --resume
+Next     : {suggested command with example arguments}
 ```
+*(Omit the `Pipeline` line for cross-cutting commands listed above.)*
 
 
 ```

package/commands/report-bug.md

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
-# /report-bug — File a Spec-Traced Bug (Tester-Facing)
+# /report-bug — File a Spec-Traced Bug (Tester & QC-Facing)
 
-For **testers**. Produces a structured bug report with full spec context, classifies the likely
+For **testers and QC** — including **product-gaps** surfaced by the `/qc-*` pipeline
+(`/qc-run-test` FAIL classified product-gap, or a `DOC_GAPS` spec-defect blocker from
+`/qc-analyze`). Produces a structured bug report with full spec context, classifies the likely
 layer, and saves it for handoff to the dev team.
 
 **READ-ONLY on specs and code.** This command never edits PRD, BDD, tech-docs, or source.
@@ -134,6 +136,8 @@ Read `.agent/project-context.yaml`. Extract and store:
 - `paths.specs_dir` → BDD specs root
 - `paths.prd_dir` → PRD documents root
 - `paths.refinement_dir` → findings/review output dir
+- `paths.qc_dir` → QC automation artifacts root (visible top-level, one subfolder per UC: `{qc_dir}/{UC-ID}/`)
+- `paths.qc_skills_dir` → where qc-* commands load QC skills from (default bundled `.agent/skills/qc`; override to the QC team's own repo/submodule so framework upgrade won't overwrite them)
 - `paths.product_definitions_dir` → product definitions root
 - `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → domain knowledge root
 - `paths.business_dictionary` → path to business-dictionary.md
@@ -146,6 +150,8 @@ If `paths` section is absent, use these defaults:
 - `specs_dir` = `specs/bdd`
 - `prd_dir` = `specs/prd`
 - `refinement_dir` = `.agent/review`
+- `qc_dir` = `docs`
+- `qc_skills_dir` = `.agent/skills/qc`
 - `product_definitions_dir` = `specs/product-definition`
 - `domain_knowledge_dir` = `specs/domain-knowledge`
 - `business_dictionary` = `specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
@@ -171,7 +177,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - If `$ARGUMENTS` contains a path, extract the segment after `prd_dir`
 
 **2. Route to service** — if active domain matches a key in `services`:
-- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir`
+- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, ALL BDD (web/app/**system**) is a shared cross-team artifact → leave `specs_dir` for step 4 to route to the spec repo; do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, the tech-design (API contract) is a cross-team artifact and must live in the shared spec repo (handled in step 4), so leave `tech_docs_dir` for step 4 to route — do NOT pin it per-service here.
 - Store `active_service` = `services.{domain}.path`
 - Store `active_service_module` = `services.{domain}.module`
@@ -182,6 +188,7 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Set `active_service = unresolved`
 
 **4. Spec source auto-override** — if `setup.spec_source` is set AND the corresponding path was not already explicitly set in `paths:`:
+- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/bdd` — **always when `spec_source` is set.** All BDD (web/app/**system**) lives in the shared spec repo so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same scenarios; the FE tech-design gate + `/generate-code --phase=ui`/`--phase=integration` resolve the `system/` BDD here. *(Per-service `specs/bdd` only when there is no `spec_source`.)*
 - Override `paths.prd_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/prd`
 - Override `paths.design_spec_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/design-spec`
 - Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/tech-docs` — **always when `spec_source` is set** (step 2 no longer pins tech-docs per-service in this case). The tech-design IS the cross-team API contract: BE authors it here, and FE/App read it from the same spec submodule at `/generate-code --phase=integration`. *(Per-service tech-docs only happen when there is no `spec_source` — a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module.)*
@@ -190,8 +197,10 @@ If `services` section is present:
 - Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
 - Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
 - Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
+- Override `paths.prd_change_requests_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/prd-change-requests`
+- Override `paths.trace_dir` → `{spec_source}/.trace` — **always when `spec_source` is set.** Trace TSVs are consolidated in the spec repo (single authoritative location, no per-service split) so the PM/PO has one place to manage status. Code-side commands (`/generate-code`, `/dev-run-test`, `/qc-run-test`) run from `service_root` but **write their trace row into `{spec_source}/.trace`** — like they already push `feedback/` there. *(Per-service `.trace` only when there is no `spec_source`.)*
 
-> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, and tester feedback are all **cross-team artifacts** — they must live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads the same source via `/sync`. Tech-docs specifically: BE authors the tech-design (API contract), commits + pushes it into the spec submodule (2-layer commit), and FE/App pull it on their next `/sync` to wire the real API in `/generate-code --phase=integration`. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), these default under the repo root — still shared, same repo.
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, design-spec, domain knowledge, **all BDD (web/app/system)**, the **API contract (tech-docs)**, tester feedback, **and the `.trace/` coverage state** are all **cross-team artifacts** — they live in the **shared spec repo** so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) and the PM read one source via `/sync`. The service submodule holds only **code** (+ build/test tooling). `.trace/` and `feedback/` are the dev/QC **write areas** in the spec repo (the PRD/BDD/design-spec/tech-docs there stay read-only for dev/QC — only PO edits those). In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), everything defaults under the repo root — still one repo.
 
 ---
 
@@ -211,12 +220,12 @@ When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-
 |----------|--------|
 | `conventions.test_command` | service's `conventions.test_command` |
 | `conventions.build_command` | service's `conventions.build_command` |
-| `paths.trace_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` — default: `{active_service}/.trace` |
-| `paths.specs_dir` | `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` (if set in service config, else keep Step 1.5 override) |
+| `paths.trace_dir` | **If `spec_source` is set → keep the Step 4 spec-repo route (`{spec_source}/.trace`); ignore any service-level `trace_dir`.** Only when there is no `spec_source`: `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` (default `{active_service}/.trace`). |
+| `paths.specs_dir` | **If `spec_source` is set → keep the Step 4 spec-repo route (`{spec_source}/specs/bdd`); ignore any service-level `specs_dir`** (BDD is cross-team, never per-service in this mode). Only when there is no `spec_source`: `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` if set, else the Step 1.5 override. |
 
 **3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
 - Shell commands (`/dev-run-test`, `/dev-gen-test`) run **from within** `service_root`
-- File write operations (test files, trace TSVs) use paths **relative to** `service_root`
+- **Source/test files** are written relative to `service_root`; **trace TSVs** are written to `{paths.trace_dir}` (the spec repo when `spec_source` is set — a cross-repo write, committed/pushed to the spec submodule like `feedback/`).
 
 **4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
 
@@ -446,6 +455,17 @@ State the classification as a suggestion (dev confirms during `/fix-bug`).
 Assign `BUG-{today YYYYMMDD}-{NN}` (NN = next sequence among existing reports).
 Write to `{paths.bug_reports_dir}/{BUG-ID}.md` (resolved to `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports/` in umbrella mode; create dir if needed) using the structure in the Output block, and also print it for pasting into Jira/Slack.
 
+## Step 5.5 — Backfill the trace (pending-view link)
+
+If Step 1 matched a specific failing scenario `{UC-ID}-SC{N}` **and** a trace row exists in
+`{paths.trace_dir}/{UC-ID}.tsv`, update **only** that row so the PO/PM "waiting-on" view points
+to this bug — leave every other column (incl. `qc_status`) unchanged:
+- `qc_blocked_by` = `{BUG-ID}`
+- `qc_owner` = `dev` if likely layer ∈ {Code, BDD, Design Spec, Env} · `po` if likely layer = PRD ambiguity
+
+Skip silently if no SC matched or no trace file/row exists (a bug can still be filed). This is
+the only write this command makes to operational state — it still **never** edits PRD/BDD/code.
+
 ## Step 6 — Handoff (so PO/Dev actually see it)
 
 The report only reaches PO/Dev if it is **committed and pushed to the shared spec repo**. A local file is a dead drop.
@@ -494,6 +514,36 @@ Output Artifacts:
 
 If no files were written (e.g., review or analysis commands) → write `Output Artifacts: none (read-only)`.
 
+## Pipeline Position
+
+Print a one-line map of the pipeline with the CURRENT command's phase marked `◀ bạn ở đây`,
+so the user always sees where this command sits in the end-to-end flow:
+
+```
+Discovery → PRD → [Design Spec] → BDD → Tech Design → Code → Dev Self-Check → QC → Trace Audit
+```
+
+Find the current command in this phase legend and mark **its** phase in the map above:
+
+| Phase | Commands |
+|-------|----------|
+| Discovery | `/define-product` |
+| PRD | `/generate-prd` · `/refine-prd` · `/review-context` (PRD) |
+| Design Spec | `/generate-design-spec` |
+| BDD | `/generate-bdd` · `/review-context` (BDD) |
+| Tech Design | `/generate-tech-docs` · `/map-testids` · `/review-tech-docs` |
+| Code | `/generate-code` · `/review-code` |
+| Dev Self-Check | `/dev-gen-test` · `/dev-run-test` · `/dev-smoke-test` |
+| QC | `/qc-analyze` · `/qc-plan` · `/qc-design-test` · `/qc-review` · `/qc-run-test` · `/qc-report` |
+| Trace Audit | `/validate-traces` |
+
+For a **review command**, also append the 3-step review loop with the current step marked, e.g.:
+`Vòng review: [① phân tích ◀] → ② Review Board → ③ --resume`.
+
+**Cross-cutting commands** (`/sync`, `/update-framework`, `/fix-bug`, `/debug`, `/learn`,
+`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`, `/generate-spec-manifest`) sit outside the linear pipeline —
+**omit the Pipeline line entirely** for these (do not force-fit them onto the map).
+
 ## Next Command Suggestion
 
 Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
@@ -535,16 +585,20 @@ Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
 Format the footer as:
 ```
 ---
-Status : {badge}
+Status   : {badge}
 {Output Artifacts block}
-Next   : {suggested command with example arguments}
+Pipeline : Discovery → PRD → [BDD ◀ bạn ở đây] → Tech Design → Code → Dev Self-Check → QC → Trace Audit
+           (review cmd) Vòng review: [① phân tích ◀] → ② Review Board → ③ --resume
+Next     : {suggested command with example arguments}
 ```
+*(Omit the `Pipeline` line for cross-cutting commands listed above.)*
 
 
 ```
 🐞 {BUG-ID}  →  {paths.bug_reports_dir}/{BUG-ID}.md  (in shared spec repo)
 
 Feature  : {UC-ID} — {feature name}   |  Service: {service}   |  Severity: {Critical|Major|Minor}
+State    : 🟢 Open   (lifecycle: Open → Fixed → Closed — set `Fixed` by /fix-bug, `Closed` after /qc-run-test re-verify pass)
 
 Spec context
   PRD      : {prd_path} (v{prd_version})

package/commands/report-bug.tmpl

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
-# /report-bug — File a Spec-Traced Bug (Tester-Facing)
+# /report-bug — File a Spec-Traced Bug (Tester & QC-Facing)
 
-For **testers**. Produces a structured bug report with full spec context, classifies the likely
+For **testers and QC** — including **product-gaps** surfaced by the `/qc-*` pipeline
+(`/qc-run-test` FAIL classified product-gap, or a `DOC_GAPS` spec-defect blocker from
+`/qc-analyze`). Produces a structured bug report with full spec context, classifies the likely
 layer, and saves it for handoff to the dev team.
 
 **READ-ONLY on specs and code.** This command never edits PRD, BDD, tech-docs, or source.
@@ -70,6 +72,17 @@ State the classification as a suggestion (dev confirms during `/fix-bug`).
 Assign `BUG-{today YYYYMMDD}-{NN}` (NN = next sequence among existing reports).
 Write to `{paths.bug_reports_dir}/{BUG-ID}.md` (resolved to `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports/` in umbrella mode; create dir if needed) using the structure in the Output block, and also print it for pasting into Jira/Slack.
 
+## Step 5.5 — Backfill the trace (pending-view link)
+
+If Step 1 matched a specific failing scenario `{UC-ID}-SC{N}` **and** a trace row exists in
+`{paths.trace_dir}/{UC-ID}.tsv`, update **only** that row so the PO/PM "waiting-on" view points
+to this bug — leave every other column (incl. `qc_status`) unchanged:
+- `qc_blocked_by` = `{BUG-ID}`
+- `qc_owner` = `dev` if likely layer ∈ {Code, BDD, Design Spec, Env} · `po` if likely layer = PRD ambiguity
+
+Skip silently if no SC matched or no trace file/row exists (a bug can still be filed). This is
+the only write this command makes to operational state — it still **never** edits PRD/BDD/code.
+
 ## Step 6 — Handoff (so PO/Dev actually see it)
 
 The report only reaches PO/Dev if it is **committed and pushed to the shared spec repo**. A local file is a dead drop.
@@ -102,6 +115,7 @@ git push                      # → PO/Dev see it on their next /sync
 🐞 {BUG-ID}  →  {paths.bug_reports_dir}/{BUG-ID}.md  (in shared spec repo)
 
 Feature  : {UC-ID} — {feature name}   |  Service: {service}   |  Severity: {Critical|Major|Minor}
+State    : 🟢 Open   (lifecycle: Open → Fixed → Closed — set `Fixed` by /fix-bug, `Closed` after /qc-run-test re-verify pass)
 
 Spec context
   PRD      : {prd_path} (v{prd_version})