@amrhas82/agentic-kit 1.1.0 → 1.2.0

package/packages/ampcode/resources/data.md

@@ -0,0 +1,1372 @@
+# Data Files Library
+Consolidated on: 2025-11-01T17:48:47.228307
+This file consolidates all data reference files.
+## Table of Contents
+- [Brainstorming Techniques](#brainstorming-techniques)
+- [Elicitation Methods](#elicitation-methods)
+- [Knowledge Base](#knowledge-base)
+- [Technical Preferences](#technical-preferences)
+- [Test Levels Framework](#test-levels-framework)
+- [Test Priorities Matrix](#test-priorities-matrix)
+
+---
+
+## Brainstorming Techniques {#brainstorming-techniques}
+
+
+# Brainstorming Techniques Data
+
+## Creative Expansion
+
+1. **What If Scenarios**: Ask one provocative question, get their response, then ask another
+2. **Analogical Thinking**: Give one example analogy, ask them to find 2-3 more
+3. **Reversal/Inversion**: Pose the reverse question, let them work through it
+4. **First Principles Thinking**: Ask "What are the fundamentals?" and guide them to break it down
+
+## Structured Frameworks
+
+5. **SCAMPER Method**: Go through one letter at a time, wait for their ideas before moving to next
+6. **Six Thinking Hats**: Present one hat, ask for their thoughts, then move to next hat
+7. **Mind Mapping**: Start with central concept, ask them to suggest branches
+
+## Collaborative Techniques
+
+8. **"Yes, And..." Building**: They give idea, you "yes and" it, they "yes and" back - alternate
+9. **Brainwriting/Round Robin**: They suggest idea, you build on it, ask them to build on yours
+10. **Random Stimulation**: Give one random prompt/word, ask them to make connections
+
+## Deep Exploration
+
+11. **Five Whys**: Ask "why" and wait for their answer before asking next "why"
+12. **Morphological Analysis**: Ask them to list parameters first, then explore combinations together
+13. **Provocation Technique (product-owner)**: Give one provocative statement, ask them to extract useful ideas
+
+## Advanced Techniques
+
+14. **Forced Relationships**: Connect two unrelated concepts and ask them to find the bridge
+15. **Assumption Reversal**: Challenge their core assumptions and ask them to build from there
+16. **Role Playing**: Ask them to brainstorm from different stakeholder perspectives
+17. **Time Shifting**: "How would you solve this in 1995? 2030?"
+18. **Resource Constraints**: "What if you had only $10 and 1 hour?"
+19. **Metaphor Mapping**: Use extended metaphors to explore solutions
+20. **Question Storming**: Generate questions instead of answers first
+
+
+---
+
+## Elicitation Methods {#elicitation-methods}
+
+
+# Elicitation Methods Data
+
+## Core Reflective Methods
+
+**Expand or Contract for Audience**
+
+- Ask whether to 'expand' (add detail, elaborate) or 'contract' (simplify, clarify)
+- Identify specific target audience if relevant
+- Tailor content complexity and depth accordingly
+
+**Explain Reasoning (CoT Step-by-Step)**
+
+- Walk through the step-by-step thinking process
+- Reveal underlying assumptions and decision points
+- Show how conclusions were reached from current role's perspective
+
+**Critique and Refine**
+
+- Review output for flaws, inconsistencies, or improvement areas
+- Identify specific weaknesses from role's expertise
+- Suggest refined version reflecting domain knowledge
+
+## Structural Analysis Methods
+
+**Analyze Logical Flow and Dependencies**
+
+- Examine content structure for logical progression
+- Check internal consistency and coherence
+- Identify and validate dependencies between elements
+- Confirm effective ordering and sequencing
+
+**Assess Alignment with Overall Goals**
+
+- Evaluate content contribution to stated objectives
+- Identify any misalignments or gaps
+- Interpret alignment from specific role's perspective
+- Suggest adjustments to better serve goals
+
+## Risk and Challenge Methods
+
+**Identify Potential Risks and Unforeseen Issues**
+
+- Brainstorm potential risks from role's expertise
+- Identify overlooked edge cases or scenarios
+- Anticipate unintended consequences
+- Highlight implementation challenges
+
+**Challenge from Critical Perspective**
+
+- Adopt critical stance on current content
+- Play devil's advocate from specified viewpoint
+- Argue against proposal highlighting weaknesses
+- Apply YAGNI principles when appropriate (scope trimming)
+
+## Creative Exploration Methods
+
+**Tree of Thoughts Deep Dive**
+
+- Break problem into discrete "thoughts" or intermediate steps
+- Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously
+- Use self-evaluation to classify each path as "sure", "likely", or "impossible"
+- Apply search algorithms (BFS/DFS) to find optimal solution paths
+
+**Hindsight is 20/20: The 'If Only...' Reflection**
+
+- Imagine retrospective scenario based on current content
+- Identify the one "if only we had known/done X..." insight
+- Describe imagined consequences humorously or dramatically
+- Extract actionable learnings for current context
+
+## Multi-Persona Collaboration Methods
+
+**Agile Team Perspective Shift**
+
+- Rotate through different Scrum team member viewpoints
+- Product Owner: Focus on user value and business impact
+- Scrum Master: Examine process flow and team dynamics
+- Developer: Assess technical implementation and complexity
+- qa-test-architect: Identify testing scenarios and quality concerns
+
+**Stakeholder Round Table**
+
+- Convene virtual meeting with multiple personas
+- Each persona contributes unique perspective on content
+- Identify conflicts and synergies between viewpoints
+- Synthesize insights into actionable recommendations
+
+**Meta-Prompting Analysis**
+
+- Step back to analyze the structure and logic of current approach
+- Question the format and methodology being used
+- Suggest alternative frameworks or mental models
+- Optimize the elicitation process itself
+
+## Advanced 2025 Techniques
+
+**Self-Consistency Validation**
+
+- Generate multiple reasoning paths for same problem
+- Compare consistency across different approaches
+- Identify most reliable and robust solution
+- Highlight areas where approaches diverge and why
+
+**ReWOO (Reasoning Without Observation)**
+
+- Separate parametric reasoning from tool-based actions
+- Create reasoning plan without external dependencies
+- Identify what can be solved through pure reasoning
+- Optimize for efficiency and reduced token usage
+
+**Persona-Pattern Hybrid**
+
+- Combine specific role expertise with elicitation pattern
+- Architect + Risk Analysis: Deep technical risk assessment
+- UX Expert + User Journey: End-to-end experience critique
+- product-manager + Stakeholder Analysis: Multi-perspective impact review
+
+**Emergent Collaboration Discovery**
+
+- Allow multiple perspectives to naturally emerge
+- Identify unexpected insights from persona interactions
+- Explore novel combinations of viewpoints
+- Capture serendipitous discoveries from multi-agent thinking
+
+## Game-Based Elicitation Methods
+
+**Red Team vs Blue Team**
+
+- Red Team: Attack the proposal, find vulnerabilities
+- Blue Team: Defend and strengthen the approach
+- Competitive analysis reveals blind spots
+- Results in more robust, battle-tested solutions
+
+**Innovation Tournament**
+
+- Pit multiple alternative approaches against each other
+- Score each approach across different criteria
+- Crowd-source evaluation from different personas
+- Identify winning combination of features
+
+**Escape Room Challenge**
+
+- Present content as constraints to work within
+- Find creative solutions within tight limitations
+- Identify minimum viable approach
+- Discover innovative workarounds and optimizations
+
+## Process Control
+
+**Proceed / No Further Actions**
+
+- Acknowledge choice to finalize current work
+- Accept output as-is or move to next step
+- Prepare to continue without additional elicitation
+
+
+---
+
+## Knowledge Base {#knowledge-base}
+
+
+## Overview
+
+Agentic Kit Method (Breakthrough Method of Agile AI-driven Development) is a framework that combines AI agents with Agile development methodologies. The v4 system introduces a modular architecture with improved dependency management, bundle optimization, and support for both web and IDE environments.
+
+### Key Features
+
+- **Modular Agent System**: Specialized AI agents for each Agile role
+- **Build System**: Automated dependency resolution and optimization
+- **Dual Environment Support**: Optimized for both web UIs and IDEs
+- **Reusable Resources**: Portable templates, tasks, and checklists
+- **Slash Command Integration**: Quick agent switching and control
+
+### When to Use Agentic Kit
+
+- **New Projects (Greenfield)**: Complete end-to-end development
+- **Existing Projects (Brownfield)**: Feature additions and enhancements
+- **Team Collaboration**: Multiple roles working together
+- **Quality Assurance**: Structured testing and validation
+- **Documentation**: Professional PRDs, architecture docs, user stories
+
+## How Agentic Kit Works
+
+### The Core Method
+
+Agentic Kit transforms you into a "Vibe CEO" - directing a team of specialized AI agents through structured workflows. Here's how:
+
+1. **You Direct, AI Executes**: You provide vision and decisions; agents handle implementation details
+2. **Specialized Agents**: Each agent masters one role (product-manager, Developer, Architect, etc.)
+3. **Structured Workflows**: Proven patterns guide you from idea to deployed code
+4. **Clean Handoffs**: Fresh context windows ensure agents stay focused and effective
+
+### The Two-Phase Approach
+
+#### Phase 1: Planning (Web UI - Cost Effective)
+
+- Use large context windows (Gemini's 1M tokens)
+- Generate comprehensive documents (PRD, Architecture)
+- Leverage multiple agents for brainstorming
+- Create once, use throughout development
+
+#### Phase 2: Development (IDE - Implementation)
+
+- Shard documents into manageable pieces
+- Execute focused scrum-master → Dev cycles
+- One story at a time, sequential progress
+- Real-time file operations and testing
+
+### The Development Loop
+
+```text
+1. scrum-master Agent (New Chat) → Creates next story from sharded docs
+2. You → Review and approve story
+3. Dev Agent (New Chat) → Implements approved story
+4. QA Agent (New Chat) → Reviews and refactors code
+5. You → Verify completion
+6. Repeat until epic complete
+```
+
+### Why This Works
+
+- **Context Optimization**: Clean chats = better AI performance
+- **Role Clarity**: Agents don't context-switch = higher quality
+- **Incremental Progress**: Small stories = manageable complexity
+- **Human Oversight**: You validate each step = quality control
+- **Document-Driven**: Specs guide everything = consistency
+
+## Getting Started
+
+### Quick Start Options
+
+#### Option 1: Web UI
+
+**Best for**: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini users who want to start immediately
+
+1. Navigate to `dist/teams/`
+2. Copy `team-fullstack.txt` content
+3. Create new Gemini Gem or CustomGPT
+4. Upload file with instructions: "Your critical operating instructions are attached, do not break character as directed"
+5. Type `/help` to see available commands
+
+#### Option 2: IDE Integration
+
+**Best for**: Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Trae, Cline, Roo Code, Github Copilot users
+
+```bash
+# Interactive installation (recommended)
+npx agentic-kit install
+```
+
+**Installation Steps**:
+
+- Choose "Complete installation"
+- Select your IDE from supported options:
+  - **Cursor**: Native AI integration
+  - **Claude Code**: Anthropic's official IDE
+  - **Windsurf**: Built-in AI capabilities
+  - **Trae**: Built-in AI capabilities
+  - **Cline**: VS Code extension with AI features
+  - **Roo Code**: Web-based IDE with agent support
+  - **GitHub Copilot**: VS Code extension with AI peer programming assistant
+  - **Auggie CLI (Augment Code)**: AI-powered development environment
+
+**Note for VS Code Users**: Agentic Kit Method assumes when you mention "VS Code" that you're using it with an AI-powered extension like GitHub Copilot, Cline, or Roo. Standard VS Code without AI capabilities cannot run Agentic Kit agents. The installer includes built-in support for Cline and Roo.
+
+**Verify Installation**:
+
+- `.` folder created with all agents
+- IDE-specific integration files created
+- All agent commands/rules/modes available
+
+**Remember**: At its core, Agentic Kit Method is about mastering and harnessing prompt engineering. Any IDE with AI agent support can use Agentic Kit - the framework provides the structured prompts and workflows that make AI development effective
+
+### Environment Selection Guide
+
+**Use Web UI for**:
+
+- Initial planning and documentation (PRD, architecture)
+- Cost-effective document creation (especially with Gemini)
+- Brainstorming and analysis phases
+- Multi-agent consultation and planning
+
+**Use IDE for**:
+
+- Active development and coding
+- File operations and project integration
+- Document sharding and story management
+- Implementation workflow (scrum-master/Dev cycles)
+
+**Cost-Saving Tip**: Create large documents (PRDs, architecture) in web UI, then copy to `docs/prd.md` and `docs/architecture.md` in your project before switching to IDE for development.
+
+### IDE-Only Workflow Considerations
+
+**Can you do everything in IDE?** Yes, but understand the tradeoffs:
+
+**Pros of IDE-Only**:
+
+- Single environment workflow
+- Direct file operations from start
+- No copy/paste between environments
+- Immediate project integration
+
+**Cons of IDE-Only**:
+
+- Higher token costs for large document creation
+- Smaller context windows (varies by IDE/model)
+- May hit limits during planning phases
+- Less cost-effective for brainstorming
+
+**Using Web Agents in IDE**:
+
+- **NOT RECOMMENDED**: Web agents (product-manager, Architect) have rich dependencies designed for large contexts
+- **Why it matters**: Dev agents are kept lean to maximize coding context
+- **The principle**: "Dev agents code, planning agents plan" - mixing breaks this optimization
+
+**Aboutmaster andorchestrator**:
+
+- **kit-master**: CAN do any task without switching agents, BUT...
+- **Still use specialized agents for planning**: product-manager, Architect, and UX Expert have tuned personas that produce better results
+- **Why specialization matters**: Each agent's personality and focus creates higher quality outputs
+- **If usingmaster/orchestrator**: Fine for planning phases, but...
+
+**CRITICAL RULE for Development**:
+
+- **ALWAYS use scrum-master agent for story creation** - Never usemaster ororchestrator
+- **ALWAYS use Dev agent for implementation** - Never usemaster ororchestrator
+- **Why this matters**: scrum-master and Dev agents are specifically optimized for the development workflow
+- **No exceptions**: Even if usingmaster for everything else, switch to scrum-master → Dev for implementation
+
+**Best Practice for IDE-Only**:
+
+1. Use PM/Architect/UX agents for planning (better thanmaster)
+2. Create documents directly in project
+3. Shard immediately after creation
+4. **MUST switch to scrum-master agent** for story creation
+5. **MUST switch to Dev agent** for implementation
+6. Keep planning and coding in separate chat sessions
+
+## Core Configuration (core-config.yaml)
+
+**New in V4**: The `.core-config.yaml` file is a critical innovation that enables Agentic Kit to work seamlessly with any project structure, providing maximum flexibility and backwards compatibility.
+
+### What is core-config.yaml?
+
+This configuration file acts as a map for Agentic Kit agents, telling them exactly where to find your project documents and how they're structured. It enables:
+
+- **Version Flexibility**: Work with V3, V4, or custom document structures
+- **Custom Locations**: Define where your documents and shards live
+- **Developer Context**: Specify which files the dev agent should always load
+- **Debug Support**: Built-in logging for troubleshooting
+
+### Key Configuration Areas
+
+#### PRD Configuration
+
+- **prdVersion**: Tells agents if PRD follows v3 or v4 conventions
+- **prdSharded**: Whether epics are embedded (false) or in separate files (true)
+- **prdShardedLocation**: Where to find sharded epic files
+- **epicFilePattern**: Pattern for epic filenames (e.g., `epic-{n}*.md`)
+
+#### Architecture Configuration
+
+- **architectureVersion**: v3 (monolithic) or v4 (sharded)
+- **architectureSharded**: Whether architecture is split into components
+- **architectureShardedLocation**: Where sharded architecture files live
+
+#### Developer Files
+
+- **devLoadAlwaysFiles**: List of files the dev agent loads for every task
+- **devDebugLog**: Where dev agent logs repeated failures
+- **agentCoreDump**: Export location for chat conversations
+
+### Why It Matters
+
+1. **No Forced Migrations**: Keep your existing document structure
+2. **Gradual Adoption**: Start with V3 and migrate to V4 at your pace
+3. **Custom Workflows**: Configure Agentic Kit to match your team's process
+4. **Intelligent Agents**: Agents automatically adapt to your configuration
+
+### Common Configurations
+
+**Legacy V3 Project**:
+
+```yaml
+prdVersion: v3
+prdSharded: false
+architectureVersion: v3
+architectureSharded: false
+```
+
+**V4 Optimized Project**:
+
+```yaml
+prdVersion: v4
+prdSharded: true
+prdShardedLocation: docs/prd
+architectureVersion: v4
+architectureSharded: true
+architectureShardedLocation: docs/architecture
+```
+
+## Core Philosophy
+
+### Vibe CEO'ing
+
+You are the "Vibe CEO" - thinking like a CEO with unlimited resources and a singular vision. Your AI agents are your high-powered team, and your role is to:
+
+- **Direct**: Provide clear instructions and objectives
+- **Refine**: Iterate on outputs to achieve quality
+- **Oversee**: Maintain strategic alignment across all agents
+
+### Core Principles
+
+1. **MAXIMIZE_AI_LEVERAGE**: Push the AI to deliver more. Challenge outputs and iterate.
+2. **QUALITY_CONTROL**: You are the ultimate arbiter of quality. Review all outputs.
+3. **STRATEGIC_OVERSIGHT**: Maintain the high-level vision and ensure alignment.
+4. **ITERATIVE_REFINEMENT**: Expect to revisit steps. This is not a linear process.
+5. **CLEAR_INSTRUCTIONS**: Precise requests lead to better outputs.
+6. **DOCUMENTATION_IS_KEY**: Good inputs (briefs, PRDs) lead to good outputs.
+7. **START_SMALL_SCALE_FAST**: Test concepts, then expand.
+8. **EMBRACE_THE_CHAOS**: Adapt and overcome challenges.
+
+### Key Workflow Principles
+
+1. **Agent Specialization**: Each agent has specific expertise and responsibilities
+2. **Clean Handoffs**: Always start fresh when switching between agents
+3. **Status Tracking**: Maintain story statuses (Draft → Approved → InProgress → Done)
+4. **Iterative Development**: Complete one story before starting the next
+5. **Documentation First**: Always start with solid PRD and architecture
+
+## Agent System
+
+### Core Development Team
+
+| Agent                | Role               | Primary Functions                       | When to Use                            |
+|----------------------| ------------------ | --------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- |
+| `business-analyst`            | Business Analyst   | Market research, requirements gathering | Project planning, competitive analysis |
+| `product-manager`    | Product Manager    | PRD creation, feature prioritization    | Strategic planning, roadmaps           |
+| `holistic-architect` | Solution Architect | System design, technical architecture   | Complex systems, scalability planning  |
+| `full-stack-dev`     | Developer          | Code implementation, debugging          | All development tasks                  |
+| `qa-test-architect`  | QA Specialist      | Test planning, quality assurance        | Testing strategies, bug validation     |
+| `ux-expert`          | UX Designer        | UI/UX design, prototypes                | User experience, interface design      |
+| `product-owner`         | Product Owner      | Backlog management, story validation    | Story refinement, acceptance criteria  |
+| `scrum-master`       | Scrum Master       | Sprint planning, story creation         | Project management, workflow           |
+
+### Meta Agents
+
+| Agent               | Role             | Primary Functions                     | When to Use                       |
+| ------------------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------- | --------------------------------- |
+| `kit-orchestrator` | Team Coordinator | Multi-agent workflows, role switching | Complex multi-role tasks          |
+| `kit-master`       | Universal Expert | All capabilities without switching    | Single-session comprehensive work |
+
+### Agent Interaction Commands
+
+#### IDE-Specific Syntax
+
+**Agent Loading by IDE**:
+
+- **Claude Code**: `@agent-name` (e.g., `@master`)
+- **Opencode**: `@agent-name` (e.g., `@master`)
+- **Cursor**: `@agent-name` (e.g., `@master`)
+- **Windsurf**: `/agent-name` (e.g., `/master`)
+- **Trae**: `@agent-name` (e.g., `@master`)
+- **Roo Code**: Select mode from mode selector (e.g., `kit-master`)
+- **GitHub Copilot**: Open the Chat view (`⌃⌘I` on Mac, `Ctrl+Alt+I` on Windows/Linux) and select **Agent** from the chat mode selector.
+
+**Chat Management Guidelines**:
+
+- **Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Trae**: Start new chats when switching agents
+- **Roo Code**: Switch modes within the same conversation
+
+**Common Task Commands**:
+
+- `*help` - Show available commands
+- `*status` - Show current context/progress
+- `*exit` - Exit the agent mode
+- `*shard-doc docs/prd.md prd` - Shard PRD into manageable pieces
+- `*shard-doc docs/architecture.md architecture` - Shard architecture document
+- `*create` - Run create-next-story task (scrum-master agent)
+
+**In Web UI**:
+
+```text
+/pm create-doc prd
+/architect review system design
+/dev implement story 1.2
+/help - Show available commands
+/switch agent-name - Change active agent (if orchestrator available)
+```
+
+## Team Configurations
+
+### Pre-Built Teams
+
+#### Team All
+
+- **Includes**: All 10 agents + orchestrator
+- **Use Case**: Complete projects requiring all roles
+- **Bundle**: `team-all.txt`
+
+#### Team Fullstack
+
+- **Includes**: PM, Architect, Developer, QA, UX Expert
+- **Use Case**: End-to-end web/mobile development
+- **Bundle**: `team-fullstack.txt`
+
+#### Team No-UI
+
+- **Includes**: PM, Architect, Developer, QA (no UX Expert)
+- **Use Case**: Backend services, APIs, system development
+- **Bundle**: `team-no-ui.txt`
+
+## Core Architecture
+
+### System Overview
+
+The Agentic Kit Method is built around a modular architecture centered on the `agentic-kit` directory, which serves as the brain of the entire system. This design enables the framework to operate effectively in both IDE environments (like Cursor, VS Code) and web-based AI interfaces (like ChatGPT, Gemini).
+
+### Key Architectural Components
+
+#### 1. Agents (`agents/`)
+
+- **Purpose**: Each markdown file defines a specialized AI agent for a specific Agile role (PM, Dev, Architect, etc.)
+- **Structure**: Contains YAML headers specifying the agent's persona, capabilities, and dependencies
+- **Dependencies**: Lists of tasks, templates, checklists, and data files the agent can use
+- **Startup Instructions**: Can load project-specific documentation for immediate context
+
+#### 2. Agent Teams (`agent-teams/`)
+
+- **Purpose**: Define collections of agents bundled together for specific purposes
+- **Examples**: `team-all.yaml` (comprehensive bundle), `team-fullstack.yaml` (full-stack development)
+- **Usage**: Creates pre-packaged contexts for web UI environments
+
+#### 3. Workflows (`workflows/`)
+
+- **Purpose**: YAML files defining prescribed sequences of steps for specific project types
+- **Types**: Greenfield (new projects) and Brownfield (existing projects) for UI, service, and fullstack development
+- **Structure**: Defines agent interactions, artifacts created, and transition conditions
+
+#### 4. Reusable Resources
+
+- **Templates** (`templates/`): Markdown templates for PRDs, architecture specs, user stories
+- **Tasks** (`tasks/`): Instructions for specific repeatable actions like "shard-doc" or "create-next-story"
+- **Checklists** (`checklists/`): Quality assurance checklists for validation and review
+- **Data** (`data/`): Core knowledge base and technical preferences
+
+### Dual Environment Architecture
+
+#### IDE Environment
+
+- Users interact directly with agent markdown files
+- Agents can access all dependencies dynamically
+- Supports real-time file operations and project integration
+- Optimized for development workflow execution
+
+#### Web UI Environment
+
+- Uses pre-built bundles from `dist/teams` for stand alone 1 upload files for all agents and their assets with an orchestrating agent
+- Single text files containing all agent dependencies are in `dist/agents/` - these are unnecessary unless you want to create a web agent that is only a single agent and not a team
+- Created by the web-builder tool for upload to web interfaces
+- Provides complete context in one package
+
+### Template Processing System
+
+Agentic Kit employs a sophisticated template system with three key components:
+
+1. **Template Format** (`utils/doc-template.md`): Defines markup language for variable substitution and AI processing directives from yaml templates
+2. **Document Creation** (`tasks/create-doc.md`): Orchestrates template selection and user interaction to transform yaml spec to final markdown output
+3. **Advanced Elicitation** (`tasks/advanced-elicitation.md`): Provides interactive refinement through structured brainstorming
+
+### Technical Preferences Integration
+
+The `technical-preferences.md` file serves as a persistent technical profile that:
+
+- Ensures consistency across all agents and projects
+- Eliminates repetitive technology specification
+- Provides personalized recommendations aligned with user preferences
+- Evolves over time with lessons learned
+
+### Build and Delivery Process
+
+The `web-builder.js` tool creates web-ready bundles by:
+
+1. Reading agent or team definition files
+2. Recursively resolving all dependencies
+3. Concatenating content into single text files with clear separators
+4. Outputting ready-to-upload bundles for web AI interfaces
+
+This architecture enables seamless operation across environments while maintaining the rich, interconnected agent ecosystem that makes Agentic Kit powerful.
+
+## Complete Development Workflow
+
+### Planning Phase (Web UI Recommended - Especially Gemini!)
+
+**Ideal for cost efficiency with Gemini's massive context:**
+
+**For Brownfield Projects - Start Here!**:
+
+1. **Upload entire project to Gemini Web** (GitHub URL, files, or zip)
+2. **Document existing system**: `/business-analyst` → `*document-project`
+3. **Creates comprehensive docs** from entire codebase analysis
+
+**For All Projects**:
+
+1. **Optional Analysis**: `/business-analyst` - Market research, competitive analysis
+2. **Project Brief**: Create foundation document (business-analyst or user)
+3. **PRD Creation**: `/pm create-doc prd` - Comprehensive product requirements
+4. **Architecture Design**: `/architect create-doc architecture` - Technical foundation
+5. **Validation & Alignment**: `/po` run master checklist to ensure document consistency
+6. **Document Preparation**: Copy final documents to project as `docs/prd.md` and `docs/architecture.md`
+
+#### Example Planning Prompts
+
+**For PRD Creation**:
+
+```text
+"I want to build a [type] application that [core purpose].
+Help me brainstorm features and create a comprehensive PRD."
+```
+
+**For Architecture Design**:
+
+```text
+"Based on this PRD, design a scalable technical architecture
+that can handle [specific requirements]."
+```
+
+### Critical Transition: Web UI to IDE
+
+**Once planning is complete, you MUST switch to IDE for development:**
+
+- **Why**: Development workflow requires file operations, real-time project integration, and document sharding
+- **Cost Benefit**: Web UI is more cost-effective for large document creation; IDE is optimized for development tasks
+- **Required Files**: Ensure `docs/prd.md` and `docs/architecture.md` exist in your project
+
+### IDE Development Workflow
+
+**Prerequisites**: Planning documents must exist in `docs/` folder
+
+1. **Document Sharding** (CRITICAL STEP):
+   - Documents created by PM/Architect (in Web or IDE) MUST be sharded for development
+   - Two methods to shard:
+     a) **Manual**: Drag `shard-doc` task + document file into chat
+     b) **Agent**: Ask `@kit-master` or `@po` to shard documents
+   - Shards `docs/prd.md` → `docs/prd/` folder
+   - Shards `docs/architecture.md` → `docs/architecture/` folder
+   - **WARNING**: Do NOT shard in Web UI - copying many small files is painful!
+
+2. **Verify Sharded Content**:
+   - At least one `epic-n.md` file in `docs/prd/` with stories in development order
+   - Source tree document and coding standards for dev agent reference
+   - Sharded docs for scrum-master agent story creation
+
+Resulting Folder Structure:
+
+- `docs/prd/` - Broken down PRD sections
+- `docs/architecture/` - Broken down architecture sections
+- `docs/stories/` - Generated user stories
+
+1. **Development Cycle** (Sequential, one story at a time):
+
+   **CRITICAL CONTEXT MANAGEMENT**:
+   - **Context windows matter!** Always use fresh, clean context windows
+   - **Model selection matters!** Use most powerful thinking model for scrum-master story creation
+   - **ALWAYS start new chat between scrum-master, Dev, and QA work**
+
+   **Step 1 - Story Creation**:
+   - **NEW CLEAN CHAT** → Select powerful model → `@scrum-master` → `*create`
+   - scrum-master executes create-next-story task
+   - Review generated story in `docs/stories/`
+   - Update status from "Draft" to "Approved"
+
+   **Step 2 - Story Implementation**:
+   - **NEW CLEAN CHAT** → `@dev`
+   - Agent asks which story to implement
+   - Include story file content to save dev agent lookup time
+   - Dev follows tasks/subtasks, marking completion
+   - Dev maintains File List of all changes
+   - Dev marks story as "Review" when complete with all tests passing
+
+   **Step 3 - Senior QA Review**:
+   - **NEW CLEAN CHAT** → `@qa` → execute review-story task
+   - QA performs senior developer code review
+   - QA can refactor and improve code directly
+   - QA appends results to story's QA Results section
+   - If approved: Status → "Done"
+   - If changes needed: Status stays "Review" with unchecked items for dev
+
+   **Step 4 - Repeat**: Continue scrum-master → Dev → QA cycle until all epic stories complete
+
+**Important**: Only 1 story in progress at a time, worked sequentially until all epic stories complete.
+
+### Status Tracking Workflow
+
+Stories progress through defined statuses:
+
+- **Draft** → **Approved** → **InProgress** → **Done**
+
+Each status change requires user verification and approval before proceeding.
+
+### Workflow Types
+
+#### Greenfield Development
+
+- Business analysis and market research
+- Product requirements and feature definition
+- System architecture and design
+- Development execution
+- Testing and deployment
+
+#### Brownfield Enhancement (Existing Projects)
+
+**Key Concept**: Brownfield development requires comprehensive documentation of your existing project for AI agents to understand context, patterns, and constraints.
+
+**Complete Brownfield Workflow Options**:
+
+**Option 1: PRD-First (Recommended for Large Codebases/Monorepos)**:
+
+1. **Upload project to Gemini Web** (GitHub URL, files, or zip)
+2. **Create PRD first**: `@pm` → `*create-doc brownfield-prd`
+3. **Focused documentation**: `@business-analyst` → `*document-project`
+   - business-analyst asks for focus if no PRD provided
+   - Choose "single document" format for Web UI
+   - Uses PRD to document ONLY relevant areas
+   - Creates one comprehensive markdown file
+   - Avoids bloating docs with unused code
+
+**Option 2: Document-First (Good for Smaller Projects)**:
+
+1. **Upload project to Gemini Web**
+2. **Document everything**: `@business-analyst` → `*document-project`
+3. **Then create PRD**: `@pm` → `*create-doc brownfield-prd`
+   - More thorough but can create excessive documentation
+
+4. **Requirements Gathering**:
+   - **Brownfield PRD**: Use PM agent with `brownfield-prd-tmpl`
+   - **Analyzes**: Existing system, constraints, integration points
+   - **Defines**: Enhancement scope, compatibility requirements, risk assessment
+   - **Creates**: Epic and story structure for changes
+
+5. **Architecture Planning**:
+   - **Brownfield Architecture**: Use Architect agent with `brownfield-architecture-tmpl`
+   - **Integration Strategy**: How new features integrate with existing system
+   - **Migration Planning**: Gradual rollout and backwards compatibility
+   - **Risk Mitigation**: Addressing potential breaking changes
+
+**Brownfield-Specific Resources**:
+
+**Templates**:
+
+- `brownfield-prd-tmpl.md`: Comprehensive enhancement planning with existing system analysis
+- `brownfield-architecture-tmpl.md`: Integration-focused architecture for existing systems
+
+**Tasks**:
+
+- `document-project`: Generates comprehensive documentation from existing codebase
+- `brownfield-create-epic`: Creates single epic for focused enhancements (when full PRD is overkill)
+- `brownfield-create-story`: Creates individual story for small, isolated changes
+
+**When to Use Each Approach**:
+
+**Full Brownfield Workflow** (Recommended for):
+
+- Major feature additions
+- System modernization
+- Complex integrations
+- Multiple related changes
+
+**Quick Epic/Story Creation** (Use when):
+
+- Single, focused enhancement
+- Isolated bug fixes
+- Small feature additions
+- Well-documented existing system
+
+**Critical Success Factors**:
+
+1. **Documentation First**: Always run `document-project` if docs are outdated/missing
+2. **Context Matters**: Provide agents access to relevant code sections
+3. **Integration Focus**: Emphasize compatibility and non-breaking changes
+4. **Incremental Approach**: Plan for gradual rollout and testing
+
+**For detailed guide**: See `docs/working-in-the-brownfield.md`
+
+## Document Creation Best Practices
+
+### Required File Naming for Framework Integration
+
+- `docs/prd.md` - Product Requirements Document
+- `docs/architecture.md` - System Architecture Document
+
+**Why These Names Matter**:
+
+- Agents automatically reference these files during development
+- Sharding tasks expect these specific filenames
+- Workflow automation depends on standard naming
+
+### Cost-Effective Document Creation Workflow
+
+**Recommended for Large Documents (PRD, Architecture):**
+
+1. **Use Web UI**: Create documents in web interface for cost efficiency
+2. **Copy Final Output**: Save complete markdown to your project
+3. **Standard Names**: Save as `docs/prd.md` and `docs/architecture.md`
+4. **Switch to IDE**: Use IDE agents for development and smaller documents
+
+### Document Sharding
+
+Templates with Level 2 headings (`##`) can be automatically sharded:
+
+**Original PRD**:
+
+```markdown
+## Goals and Background Context
+
+## Requirements
+
+## User Interface Design Goals
+
+## Success Metrics
+```
+
+**After Sharding**:
+
+- `docs/prd/goals-and-background-context.md`
+- `docs/prd/requirements.md`
+- `docs/prd/user-interface-design-goals.md`
+- `docs/prd/success-metrics.md`
+
+Use the `shard-doc` task or `@kayvan/markdown-tree-parser` tool for automatic sharding.
+
+## Usage Patterns and Best Practices
+
+### Environment-Specific Usage
+
+**Web UI Best For**:
+
+- Initial planning and documentation phases
+- Cost-effective large document creation
+- Agent consultation and brainstorming
+- Multi-agent workflows with orchestrator
+
+**IDE Best For**:
+
+- Active development and implementation
+- File operations and project integration
+- Story management and development cycles
+- Code review and debugging
+
+### Quality Assurance
+
+- Use appropriate agents for specialized tasks
+- Follow Agile ceremonies and review processes
+- Maintain document consistency with PO agent
+- Regular validation with checklists and templates
+
+### Performance Optimization
+
+- Use specific agents vs. `kit-master` for focused tasks
+- Choose appropriate team size for project needs
+- Leverage technical preferences for consistency
+- Regular context management and cache clearing
+
+## Success Tips
+
+- **Use Gemini for big picture planning** - The team-fullstack bundle provides collaborative expertise
+- **Usemaster for document organization** - Sharding creates manageable chunks
+- **Follow the scrum-master → Dev cycle religiously** - This ensures systematic progress
+- **Keep conversations focused** - One agent, one task per conversation
+- **Review everything** - Always review and approve before marking complete
+
+## Contributing to Agentic Kit Method
+
+### Quick Contribution Guidelines
+
+For full details, see `CONTRIBUTING.md`. Key points:
+
+**Fork Workflow**:
+
+1. Fork the repository
+2. Create feature branches
+3. Submit PRs to `next` branch (default) or `main` for critical fixes only
+4. Keep PRs small: 200-400 lines ideal, 800 lines maximum
+5. One feature/fix per PR
+
+**PR Requirements**:
+
+- Clear descriptions (max 200 words) with What/Why/How/Testing
+- Use conventional commits (feat:, fix:, docs:)
+- Atomic commits - one logical change per commit
+- Must align with guiding principles
+
+**Core Principles** (from docs/GUIDING-PRINCIPLES.md):
+
+- **Dev Agents Must Be Lean**: Minimize dependencies, save context for code
+- **Natural Language First**: Everything in markdown, no code in core
+- **Core vs Expansion Packs**: Core for universal needs, packs for specialized domains
+- **Design Philosophy**: "Dev agents code, planning agents plan"
+
+## Expansion Packs
+
+### What Are Expansion Packs?
+
+Expansion packs extend Agentic Kit Method beyond traditional software development into ANY domain. They provide specialized agent teams, templates, and workflows while keeping the core framework lean and focused on development.
+
+### Why Use Expansion Packs?
+
+1. **Keep Core Lean**: Dev agents maintain maximum context for coding
+2. **Domain Expertise**: Deep, specialized knowledge without bloating core
+3. **Community Innovation**: Anyone can create and share packs
+4. **Modular Design**: Install only what you need
+
+### Available Expansion Packs
+
+**Technical Packs**:
+
+- **Infrastructure/DevOps**: Cloud architects, SRE experts, security subagents
+- **Game Development**: Game designers, level designers, narrative writers
+- **Mobile Development**: iOS/Android subagents, mobile UX experts
+- **Data Science**: ML engineers, data scientists, visualization experts
+
+**Non-Technical Packs**:
+
+- **Business Strategy**: Consultants, financial analysts, marketing strategists
+- **Creative Writing**: Plot architects, character developers, world builders
+- **Health & Wellness**: Fitness trainers, nutritionists, habit engineers
+- **Education**: Curriculum designers, assessment subagents
+- **Legal Support**: Contract analysts, compliance checkers
+
+**Specialty Packs**:
+
+- **Expansion Creator**: Tools to build your own expansion packs
+- **RPG Game Master**: Tabletop gaming assistance
+- **Life Event Planning**: Wedding planners, event coordinators
+- **Scientific Research**: Literature reviewers, methodology designers
+
+### Using Expansion Packs
+
+1. **Browse Available Packs**: Check `expansion-packs/` directory
+2. **Get Inspiration**: See `docs/expansion-packs.md` for detailed examples and ideas
+3. **Install via CLI**:
+
+   ```bash
+   npx agentic-kit install
+   # Select "Install expansion pack" option
+   ```
+
+4. **Use in Your Workflow**: Installed packs integrate seamlessly with existing agents
+
+### Creating Custom Expansion Packs
+
+Use the **expansion-creator** pack to build your own:
+
+1. **Define Domain**: What expertise are you capturing?
+2. **Design Agents**: Create specialized roles with clear boundaries
+3. **Build Resources**: Tasks, templates, checklists for your domain
+4. **Test & Share**: Validate with real use cases, share with community
+
+**Key Principle**: Expansion packs democratize expertise by making specialized knowledge accessible through AI agents.
+
+## Getting Help
+
+- **Commands**: Use `*/*help` in any environment to see available commands
+- **Agent Switching**: Use `*/*switch agent-name` with orchestrator for role changes
+- **Documentation**: Check `docs/` folder for project-specific context
+- **Community**: Discord and GitHub resources available for support
+- **Contributing**: See `CONTRIBUTING.md` for full guidelines
+
+
+---
+
+## Technical Preferences {#technical-preferences}
+
+
+# User-Defined Preferred Patterns and Preferences
+
+None Listed
+
+
+---
+
+## Test Levels Framework {#test-levels-framework}
+
+
+# Test Levels Framework
+
+Comprehensive guide for determining appropriate test levels (unit, integration, E2E) for different scenarios.
+
+## Test Level Decision Matrix
+
+### Unit Tests
+
+**When to use:**
+
+- Testing pure functions and business logic
+- Algorithm correctness
+- Input validation and data transformation
+- Error handling in isolated components
+- Complex calculations or state machines
+
+**Characteristics:**
+
+- Fast execution (immediate feedback)
+- No external dependencies (DB, API, file system)
+- Highly maintainable and stable
+- Easy to debug failures
+
+**Example scenarios:**
+
+```yaml
+unit_test:
+  component: 'PriceCalculator'
+  scenario: 'Calculate discount with multiple rules'
+  justification: 'Complex business logic with multiple branches'
+  mock_requirements: 'None - pure function'
+```
+
+### Integration Tests
+
+**When to use:**
+
+- Component interaction verification
+- Database operations and transactions
+- API endpoint contracts
+- Service-to-service communication
+- Middleware and interceptor behavior
+
+**Characteristics:**
+
+- Moderate execution time
+- Tests component boundaries
+- May use test databases or containers
+- Validates system integration points
+
+**Example scenarios:**
+
+```yaml
+integration_test:
+  components: ['UserService', 'AuthRepository']
+  scenario: 'Create user with role assignment'
+  justification: 'Critical data flow between service and persistence'
+  test_environment: 'In-memory database'
+```
+
+### End-to-End Tests
+
+**When to use:**
+
+- Critical user journeys
+- Cross-system workflows
+- Visual regression testing
+- Compliance and regulatory requirements
+- Final validation before release
+
+**Characteristics:**
+
+- Slower execution
+- Tests complete workflows
+- Requires full environment setup
+- Most realistic but most brittle
+
+**Example scenarios:**
+
+```yaml
+e2e_test:
+  journey: 'Complete checkout process'
+  scenario: 'User purchases with saved payment method'
+  justification: 'Revenue-critical path requiring full validation'
+  environment: 'Staging with test payment gateway'
+```
+
+## Test Level Selection Rules
+
+### Favor Unit Tests When:
+
+- Logic can be isolated
+- No side effects involved
+- Fast feedback needed
+- High cyclomatic complexity
+
+### Favor Integration Tests When:
+
+- Testing persistence layer
+- Validating service contracts
+- Testing middleware/interceptors
+- Component boundaries critical
+
+### Favor E2E Tests When:
+
+- User-facing critical paths
+- Multi-system interactions
+- Regulatory compliance scenarios
+- Visual regression important
+
+## Anti-patterns to Avoid
+
+- E2E testing for business logic validation
+- Unit testing framework behavior
+- Integration testing third-party libraries
+- Duplicate coverage across levels
+
+## Duplicate Coverage Guard
+
+**Before adding any test, check:**
+
+1. Is this already tested at a lower level?
+2. Can a unit test cover this instead of integration?
+3. Can an integration test cover this instead of E2E?
+
+**Coverage overlap is only acceptable when:**
+
+- Testing different aspects (unit: logic, integration: interaction, e2e: user experience)
+- Critical paths requiring defense in depth
+- Regression prevention for previously broken functionality
+
+## Test Naming Conventions
+
+- Unit: `test_{component}_{scenario}`
+- Integration: `test_{flow}_{interaction}`
+- E2E: `test_{journey}_{outcome}`
+
+## Test ID Format
+
+`{EPIC}.{STORY}-{LEVEL}-{SEQ}`
+
+Examples:
+
+- `1.3-UNIT-001`
+- `1.3-INT-002`
+- `1.3-E2E-001`
+
+
+---
+
+## Test Priorities Matrix {#test-priorities-matrix}
+
+
+# Test Priorities Matrix
+
+Guide for prioritizing test scenarios based on risk, criticality, and business impact.
+
+## Priority Levels
+
+### P0 - Critical (Must Test)
+
+**Criteria:**
+
+- Revenue-impacting functionality
+- Security-critical paths
+- Data integrity operations
+- Regulatory compliance requirements
+- Previously broken functionality (regression prevention)
+
+**Examples:**
+
+- Payment processing
+- Authentication/authorization
+- User data creation/deletion
+- Financial calculations
+- GDPR/privacy compliance
+
+**Testing Requirements:**
+
+- Comprehensive coverage at all levels
+- Both happy and unhappy paths
+- Edge cases and error scenarios
+- Performance under load
+
+### P1 - High (Should Test)
+
+**Criteria:**
+
+- Core user journeys
+- Frequently used features
+- Features with complex logic
+- Integration points between systems
+- Features affecting user experience
+
+**Examples:**
+
+- User registration flow
+- Search functionality
+- Data import/export
+- Notification systems
+- Dashboard displays
+
+**Testing Requirements:**
+
+- Primary happy paths required
+- Key error scenarios
+- Critical edge cases
+- Basic performance validation
+
+### P2 - Medium (Nice to Test)
+
+**Criteria:**
+
+- Secondary features
+- Admin functionality
+- Reporting features
+- Configuration options
+- UI polish and aesthetics
+
+**Examples:**
+
+- Admin settings panels
+- Report generation
+- Theme customization
+- Help documentation
+- Analytics tracking
+
+**Testing Requirements:**
+
+- Happy path coverage
+- Basic error handling
+- Can defer edge cases
+
+### P3 - Low (Test if Time Permits)
+
+**Criteria:**
+
+- Rarely used features
+- Nice-to-have functionality
+- Cosmetic issues
+- Non-critical optimizations
+
+**Examples:**
+
+- Advanced preferences
+- Legacy feature support
+- Experimental features
+- Debug utilities
+
+**Testing Requirements:**
+
+- Smoke tests only
+- Can rely on manual testing
+- Document known limitations
+
+## Risk-Based Priority Adjustments
+
+### Increase Priority When:
+
+- High user impact (affects >50% of users)
+- High financial impact (>$10K potential loss)
+- Security vulnerability potential
+- Compliance/legal requirements
+- Customer-reported issues
+- Complex implementation (>500 LOC)
+- Multiple system dependencies
+
+### Decrease Priority When:
+
+- Feature flag protected
+- Gradual rollout planned
+- Strong monitoring in place
+- Easy rollback capability
+- Low usage metrics
+- Simple implementation
+- Well-isolated component
+
+## Test Coverage by Priority
+
+| Priority | Unit Coverage | Integration Coverage | E2E Coverage       |
+| -------- | ------------- | -------------------- | ------------------ |
+| P0       | >90%          | >80%                 | All critical paths |
+| P1       | >80%          | >60%                 | Main happy paths   |
+| P2       | >60%          | >40%                 | Smoke tests        |
+| P3       | Best effort   | Best effort          | Manual only        |
+
+## Priority Assignment Rules
+
+1. **Start with business impact** - What happens if this fails?
+2. **Consider probability** - How likely is failure?
+3. **Factor in detectability** - Would we know if it failed?
+4. **Account for recoverability** - Can we fix it quickly?
+
+## Priority Decision Tree
+
+```
+Is it revenue-critical?
+├─ YES → P0
+└─ NO → Does it affect core user journey?
+    ├─ YES → Is it high-risk?
+    │   ├─ YES → P0
+    │   └─ NO → P1
+    └─ NO → Is it frequently used?
+        ├─ YES → P1
+        └─ NO → Is it customer-facing?
+            ├─ YES → P2
+            └─ NO → P3
+```
+
+## Test Execution Order
+
+1. Execute P0 tests first (fail fast on critical issues)
+2. Execute P1 tests second (core functionality)
+3. Execute P2 tests if time permits
+4. P3 tests only in full regression cycles
+
+## Continuous Adjustment
+
+Review and adjust priorities based on:
+
+- Production incident patterns
+- User feedback and complaints
+- Usage analytics
+- Test failure history
+- Business priority changes
+
+
+---
+