@amityco/social-plus-vise 0.14.16 → 0.14.17

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -4,6 +4,17 @@ All notable changes to `@amityco/social-plus-vise` are documented in this file.
 
 The format is loosely based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/), and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
 
+## 0.14.17 — 2026-06-05
+
+### Changed
+- **Product-first plan rules:** `vise plan` now shows shared product expectation IDs as primary `applicableRules[].rule_id` values when a rule is backed by platform-specific sensors, while preserving the exact `contract_rule_id`, `contract_rule_digest`, and `validator.sensorId` evidence needed for debugging and attestations.
+
+### Fixed
+- **Design rejection flow coverage:** the host-agent smoke now locks the behavior where `design_contract_confirmation=no` rejects the preview, withholds the design contract from feed-forward, asks for a replacement design source, and blocks `vise init` until that source is resolved.
+
+### Verified
+- Full `npm run validate` passed. A local iOS `whoops` plan smoke confirmed shared chat ids are public while iOS sensor ids remain as validator evidence.
+
 ## 0.14.16 — 2026-06-05
 
 ### Changed

package/dist/productExpectations.js

@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+export const PRODUCT_EXPECTATION_TITLES = {
+    "feed.rich-post-rendering": "Feed renders rich post types",
+    "feed.rich-post-composer-scope": "Feed composer surfaces rich post scope",
+    "comments.thread-read-write": "Comment threads support reading and creation",
+    "chat.unread-visible": "Chat unread counts are visible",
+    "chat.message-order-explicit": "Chat message order is explicit",
+    "profile.social-counts": "Profile social counts come from the SDK",
+};
 export const PRODUCT_EXPECTATION_BINDINGS = [
     {
         expectationId: "feed.rich-post-rendering",
@@ -266,6 +274,9 @@ export function productFindingIdentity(sensorId) {
 export function publicProductRuleId(ruleId) {
     return productExpectationBindingForSensor(ruleId)?.expectationId ?? ruleId;
 }
+export function productExpectationTitle(expectationId) {
+    return PRODUCT_EXPECTATION_TITLES[expectationId];
+}
 export function findingMatchesId(finding, id) {
     return finding.ruleId === id || finding.sensorId === id;
 }

package/dist/tools/compliance.js

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import path from "node:path";
 import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
 import { assessProjectCompleteness, assessProjectSelectedOptionalCapabilities, availableOptionalCapabilityIds, optionalCapabilityChecklist, platformCapabilityAvailability, selectedOptionalCapabilityIds, } from "../capabilities.js";
 import { getOutcomeDefinition, hasAnswer, planContextFor, resolveOutcome, } from "../outcomes.js";
-import { contractRuleCandidatesForPublicId, hasMultipleContractRuleCandidates, productExpectationBindingForSensor, publicProductRuleId, } from "../productExpectations.js";
+import { contractRuleCandidatesForPublicId, hasMultipleContractRuleCandidates, productExpectationBindingForSensor, productExpectationTitle, publicProductRuleId, } from "../productExpectations.js";
 import { objectInput, optionalBooleanField, optionalStringField, stringField, textResult } from "../types.js";
 import { packageVersion } from "../version.js";
 import { DESIGN_CONTRACT_CONFIRMATION_ANSWER_ID, buildDesignBrief, designContractConfirmationFromAnswers, designPreviewPath, readDesignContract, } from "./design.js";
@@ -476,6 +476,9 @@ function preferredPlatform(platforms) {
 export async function applicableComplianceRuleSummaries(outcome, platforms) {
     return (await applicableRules(outcome, platforms)).map(ruleRefForFile);
 }
+export async function applicableCompliancePlanRuleSummaries(outcome, platforms) {
+    return (await applicableRules(outcome, platforms)).map(ruleRefForPlan);
+}
 export async function checkCompliance(repoPath) {
     const repoRoot = path.resolve(repoPath);
     const compliance = await readCompliance(repoRoot);
@@ -932,6 +935,28 @@ function ruleRefForFile(rule) {
         title: rule.title,
     };
 }
+function ruleRefForPlan(rule) {
+    const publicRuleId = publicProductRuleId(rule.id);
+    const base = ruleRefForFile(rule);
+    if (publicRuleId === rule.id) {
+        return base;
+    }
+    const binding = productExpectationBindingForSensor(rule.id);
+    return {
+        ...base,
+        rule_id: publicRuleId,
+        public_rule_id: publicRuleId,
+        title: productExpectationTitle(publicRuleId) ?? rule.title,
+        contract_rule_id: rule.id,
+        contract_rule_digest: base.rule_digest,
+        validator: binding
+            ? {
+                platform: binding.platform,
+                sensorId: binding.sensorId,
+            }
+            : undefined,
+    };
+}
 // Benchmark-measured friction: agents looped on attest dialect for ~25 min/cell when docs and SDK
 // disagreed on exact invocation syntax (capability-matrix 2026-06, Row 5). Hand them the exact incantation.
 function attestHint(rule, compliance) {

package/dist/tools/integration.js

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import path from "node:path";
 import { BROAD_SOCIAL_REGEX, DESIGN_REGEX, getOutcomeDefinition, hasAnswer, planContextFor, resolveOutcome, } from "../outcomes.js";
 import { objectInput, optionalStringField, stringField, textResult } from "../types.js";
 import { availableOptionalCapabilityIds, capabilityChecklist, optionalCapabilityChecklist, platformCapabilityAvailability, selectedOptionalCapabilityIds, } from "../capabilities.js";
-import { applicableComplianceRuleSummaries } from "./compliance.js";
+import { applicableCompliancePlanRuleSummaries } from "./compliance.js";
 import { DESIGN_CONTRACT_CONFIRMATION_ANSWER_ID, buildDesignBrief, designContractConfirmationFromAnswers, designPreviewPath, readDesignContract, } from "./design.js";
 import { sdkVersionGuidance } from "./sdkVersion.js";
 import { detectCommandSensors } from "./harness.js";
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ async function buildIntegrationPlan(repoPath, request, surfacePath, answers = {}
         docs: definition.docs(platform).filter((doc) => doc.path !== "unknown"),
         surface: inspection.selectedSurface ? { path: inspection.selectedSurface.path, platforms: inspection.selectedSurface.platforms } : undefined,
         availableSurfaces: inspection.surfaces,
-        applicableRules: await applicableComplianceRuleSummaries(outcome, inspection.platforms),
+        applicableRules: await applicableCompliancePlanRuleSummaries(outcome, inspection.platforms),
         sensors: sensors.map((sensor) => ({ name: sensor.name, command: sensor.command, source: sensor.source })),
         stopConditions: composeStopConditions(ctx, definition.stopConditions(ctx), inspection.surfaces, surfacePath),
         evidencePolicy: "Every implementation step must cite at least one detected file, docs page, validator rule, or required user input. If evidence is missing, stop and ask the user instead of inventing details.",

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@amityco/social-plus-vise",
-  "version": "0.14.16",
+  "version": "0.14.17",
   "description": "Skill-guided deterministic CLI for social.plus SDK integration assistance.",
   "license": "SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE",
   "type": "module",