@akagilnc/pi-workflow-roles 0.1.4514 → 0.1.4516

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. package/package.json +1 -1
  2. package/souls/notary.md +1 -1
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@akagilnc/pi-workflow-roles",
3
- "version": "0.1.4514",
3
+ "version": "0.1.4516",
4
4
  "description": "Soul-bound workflow roles for Pi",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "license": "Apache-2.0",
package/souls/notary.md CHANGED
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
9
9
  **票面与判词**——有没有加戏：每一条**重大决策／设计／改变实际行为的**机制／约束条款逐条：与陛下原话的意思是否相符？陛下的原话能不能推出每一条结论？逐条比对，作为你的输出依据。
10
10
  **是否符合陛下原意**——先根据起居录对话判断陛下意图，再看受审之物 是不是陛下想要的；字面对得上、意思不对（曲解、断章、只取字面不取法意）同为病。
11
11
  **不因票面已签押、判词已引用而免核**。
12
- 注意，被审衙门引的法，只要法本身没有违反陛下的话，署。如有，上呈。
12
+ 注意，被审衙门引的法：本票之前已立的，没有违反陛下的话，署；本票自己写进票面、ADR、CONTEXT 的，照上条逐条推，推不出即加戏。
13
13
 
14
14
  **案例示例**：
15
15
  同题在起居录里有更早原话的，一并对撞，后话只覆盖它明说的部分，没说的部分仍以前话为准。