@ainyc/canonry 4.47.0 → 4.50.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -34,6 +34,17 @@ When a project has GA4 connected, traffic is a first-class signal alongside cita
34
34
  - Don't edit client's code without showing diffs and getting approval
35
35
  - Don't conflate "not cited" with "page doesn't exist" — check first
36
36
 
37
+ ### When to use `--probe` runs
38
+ When you need to **verify** something on your own initiative — "did the OpenAI provider migration land cleanly?", "is the regression still reproducible after the WP fix?", "does this query actually surface us when I think it should?" — use `cnry run <project> --probe --provider <p> --query "..."`. Probe runs:
39
+ - Still cost provider API quota (same wire call)
40
+ - Write a snapshot you can inspect via `cnry runs get <id>`
41
+ - Are EXCLUDED from dashboard, analytics, intelligence, insights, and notifications
42
+ - Won't wake you up again via the post-run hook (no recursive analysis loops)
43
+
44
+ Use probes whenever the run is for **your** investigation, not for the user's metrics. The two May-17 ainyc probes that broke the dashboard before this convention existed are the canonical example of why this matters — a 1-snapshot test masqueraded as "the latest sweep" and zeroed the headline.
45
+
46
+ A real (non-probe) sweep is appropriate when the user explicitly asks to refresh data ("run it again", "get the latest", "trigger a sweep").
47
+
37
48
  ### How to Communicate
38
49
  - Data first: show the numbers before the interpretation
39
50
  - Be specific: "You lost the ChatGPT citation for 'roof repair phoenix' between March 28-April 2" not "your visibility decreased"
@@ -32,6 +32,14 @@ Steps:
32
32
  8. If content fix: generate diff (schema, llms.txt, or content changes)
33
33
  9. Update memory with regression event + diagnosis
34
34
 
35
+ **Want to verify the regression is real / reproducible before reporting?** Use a probe run instead of a real sweep:
36
+
37
+ ```
38
+ cnry run <project> --probe --provider <p> --query "<regressed-query>"
39
+ ```
40
+
41
+ Then `cnry runs get <id>` to inspect the snapshot. The probe's snapshot won't displace the latest scheduled sweep on the dashboard, won't generate insights, and won't fire notifications — so you can re-test as many times as needed without polluting metrics. Promote to a real sweep (drop `--probe`) only if the operator explicitly wants the data to feed the dashboard.
42
+
35
43
  ## Workflow 3: Weekly Review
36
44
 
37
45
  Trigger: Scheduled (weekly, or on-demand)
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ You are **Aero** — an AEO analyst. You help operators understand how AI answer
12
12
  - **Evidence over opinion.** Numbers before interpretation. "You lost the ChatGPT citation for 'roof repair phoenix' between March 28 and April 2" beats "your visibility decreased."
13
13
  - **Proactive, not passive.** Regressions don't wait to be asked about. Surface them when you spot them. Flag emerging competitors the moment they appear in citations you own.
14
14
  - **Honest about uncertainty.** When the data is ambiguous, say so. Don't manufacture confidence. Don't promise fixes will appear in the next sweep — AEO changes take weeks.
15
- - **Cautious with writes.** Sweeps cost quota. Schedules shape downstream notifications. Queries define what gets tracked. Confirm intent before mutating state the operator will notice.
15
+ - **Cautious with writes.** Sweeps cost quota. Schedules shape downstream notifications. Queries define what gets tracked. Confirm intent before mutating state the operator will notice. When *you* need to test something (verify a fix, reproduce a regression), use `cnry run --probe` — same wire call, no dashboard/analytics/notification pollution.
16
16
  - **Canonry is the source of truth.** Read state back; never maintain a parallel copy in your head. Conclusions age, the data doesn't.
17
17
 
18
18
  ## Voice
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ A canonry engagement follows the same loop regardless of project size:
77
77
  4. **Monitor** — Re-run sweeps weekly (`cnry run --all --wait` fans out across every project). Correlate visibility shifts with deployments and competitor moves.
78
78
  5. **Report** — Lead with data, not interpretation: "Lost the mention for `<query>` on Gemini between <date> and <date> — two competitors moved in. Here's what to fix." For a one-command client-facing summary, run `cnry report <project>` to generate a self-contained HTML bundle (mention + citation hero, competitor landscape, GSC + GA4 performance, insights, suggested next queries). Same payload is available via `--format json` and the `canonry_report` MCP tool.
79
79
 
80
+ **Verifying without polluting metrics**: when you need to test something on your own initiative — "did the latest provider deploy work?", "is this regression reproducible?", "would this query actually surface us?" — use `cnry run <project> --probe --provider <p> --query "..."`. Probe runs write a snapshot you can inspect via `cnry runs get <id>` but are excluded from the dashboard, analytics, intelligence, report, and notifications. Use probes for *your* investigation; use real sweeps when the operator wants the data to feed metrics.
81
+
80
82
  ## Surgical Reads
81
83
 
82
84
  When you need a specific value rather than a full payload, use the dot-path getter:
@@ -78,9 +78,10 @@ cnry run <project> --wait # block until complete
78
78
  cnry run <project> --location <label> # run with specific location context
79
79
  cnry run <project> --all-locations # run for every configured location
80
80
  cnry run <project> --no-location # explicitly skip location context
81
+ cnry run <project> --probe --provider openai --query "..." # operator/agent test run — snapshot is inspectable but EXCLUDED from dashboard, analytics, intelligence, report, and notifications. Use for verification / "did this fix work?" / regression hypothesis testing.
81
82
  cnry run --all --wait # all projects
82
83
  cnry run cancel <project> [run-id] # force-cancel stuck runs
83
- cnry runs <project> --limit 10 # list recent runs
84
+ cnry runs <project> --limit 10 # list recent runs (includes both real and probe runs; filter on `trigger` if you only want one)
84
85
  cnry run show <id> # show run details
85
86
  ```
86
87
 
@@ -88,6 +89,18 @@ Run statuses: `queued` → `running` → `completed` / `failed` / `partial`
88
89
 
89
90
  `partial` = some providers failed (usually rate limits) — successful snapshots are still saved.
90
91
 
92
+ ### Probe vs real runs
93
+
94
+ | Trigger | Source | Feeds dashboard/analytics | Runs intelligence | Fires notifications | Wakes Aero |
95
+ |---|---|---|---|---|---|
96
+ | `manual` | `cnry run <project>` | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
97
+ | `scheduled` | cron schedule | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
98
+ | `config-apply` | `cnry apply` after queries change | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
99
+ | `backfill` | `cnry backfill ...` | partial (historical) | ✅ | — | — |
100
+ | **`probe`** | `cnry run --probe ...` | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
101
+
102
+ Use `--probe` whenever you're testing on your own initiative — verifying a fix landed, reproducing a regression, sanity-checking a query — rather than producing data the user/dashboard will consume.
103
+
91
104
  `snapshot` does not create a project or write to the DB. It generates category queries, runs providers, and produces a report for prospecting.
92
105
 
93
106
  ## Citation Data