@ai-matrx/records-ui 0.40.0 → 0.41.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,78 @@
1
1
  # Changelog — @ai-matrx/records-ui
2
2
 
3
+ ## 0.41.0
4
+
5
+ **The last two product screens that could not work at all, rewritten against the
6
+ doors the store actually has. PRODUCTS rows 13 and 14 (lane SCREENS-2).**
7
+
8
+ Both components shipped, were exported, and were mounted NOWHERE — and neither
9
+ could have worked if it had been.
10
+
11
+ **`ChecklistRunner` kept its own store.** It was written before the store had
12
+ checklists, so it built one out of the generic work-template doors and kept the
13
+ run in a package-owned Table (`records_ui_checklist_run`) whose columns were
14
+ `step_ids` as a JSON string that `JSON.parse` decided the steps from. That is the
15
+ same defect `ActionInbox` had — a second store beside the store — and it meant the
16
+ screen could do none of the things a checklist is FOR: no roles, so no step
17
+ belonged to anybody by their part in the process; no due dates, so "day one" and
18
+ "by Friday" had nowhere to live; no dependencies, so a step could be ticked before
19
+ the one it waits for and nothing had told the store to refuse it; no requirements,
20
+ so "done" was a person clicking a word; no trigger, so a run started by hand every
21
+ time.
22
+
23
+ It is now three mounts of one component over the store's own nine checklist doors:
24
+ the **record page** (the checklists running on this record, and the templates that
25
+ could be started on it), the **table's own Checklists rail** (`ChecklistsPanel` —
26
+ the templates, the runs, the progress, and a plain-rows editor that asks
27
+ `custom.checklist_refusal` on every change so the store's sentence arrives before
28
+ the save), and the **inbox** (`MyChecklistSteps` — a checklist step is a work item,
29
+ so it reaches its owner where her approvals already are, asked through the door
30
+ that also knows what the step asks for and whether it may be finished).
31
+
32
+ Nothing is decided on the screen. `may_complete` and `refusal` are the store's
33
+ answers per step and per seat, and `blocked_by` is what tells the door's two kinds
34
+ of "no" apart: *waiting on another step*, which has no control at all, and *asks
35
+ you to say what you did*, which is the box beside the button. A screen that read
36
+ the sentence's wording would be a second opinion, and it would be the comfortable
37
+ one — the one nobody can be refused by.
38
+
39
+ **`BookingSlots` was a slot picker for a person who has no account.** It called
40
+ `tableList`, `personKernelId`, `recordWrite`, `workSlotsDeclare`, `workSlotHolds`,
41
+ `workSlotHold` and `workSlotRelease` — seven doors granted to `authenticated` —
42
+ for a VISITOR, who can reach none of them. It also built its own grid of times in
43
+ the browser from an `availability` prop, which is a second idea of what is on
44
+ offer, and declared a THIRD slots Table under its own slug beside the one
45
+ `custom.booking_declare` finds-or-makes, so a page opened through the component and
46
+ a page opened through the link protected different indexes.
47
+
48
+ It is now the owner's panel, the way `FormsPanel` is for forms: `custom.bookings`
49
+ for the pages, their four counts and the next appointment in words in the
50
+ ORGANIZATION's own zone, the visitor's link, and open/close through
51
+ `custom.anon_publish` — offered only where `custom.my_levels` answered `admin`, and
52
+ never while that door is still in flight. It mounts on the Records home (absent
53
+ when the organization has none) and on the bookings table's own rail. The picker is
54
+ the public `/b/<id>` route's, server-fed and server-lane; a suite clause fails if
55
+ any of those nine doors is ever called from here again.
56
+
57
+ **Consumer action:** `CHECKLIST_TABLE` is gone, and so is the run store it
58
+ described — a run is `custom.checklist_runs`' and its steps are work items.
59
+ `ChecklistSpec` / `ChecklistStepSpec` are no longer re-declared here; import them
60
+ from `@ai-matrx/records`, which is where the store's own judge
61
+ (`custom.checklist_refusal`) reads them from. `BookingSlots` no longer takes
62
+ `form` or `availability`; it takes an optional `tableId` and nothing else.
63
+ `ChecklistRunner`'s `seed` prop is gone — a checklist is declared through
64
+ `checklistDeclare`, whole, and judged before a single step is written.
65
+
66
+ **The proof.** `demo/checklists.test.tsx` and `demo/bookings.test.tsx` are in the
67
+ blocking gate against RECORDED REAL answers taken from the one database by
68
+ `demo/fixtures/*.record.sql`, from the `authenticated` seat, through the doors
69
+ alone, rolled back. The checklist recording is a two-seat run — an admin describes
70
+ onboarding once, a new hire record arrives, a run starts by itself, four steps land
71
+ on two real people, and the same run answers differently from each of their seats.
72
+ The booking recording is a whole lifecycle in five snapshots: open, held, booked,
73
+ rescheduled, cancelled. `src/checklists.red.tsx` and `src/bookings.red.tsx` are the
74
+ red twins; all six clauses fail on these bytes.
75
+
3
76
  ## 0.40.0
4
77
 
5
78
  **Pressing "Settings" on a table crashed the whole page, and had since the