@adcp/sdk 6.5.0 → 6.7.0

package/examples/hello_seller_adapter_multi_tenant.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,1046 @@
+/**
+ * hello_seller_adapter_multi_tenant — one server, multiple specialisms
+ * (governance + property-lists + brand-rights), multiple tenants with
+ * isolated data. Models an agency / holdco hub.
+ *
+ * ⚠️  DO NOT DEPLOY AS-IS. This file seeds harness/demo bearer tokens in
+ *    plaintext (`sk_harness_do_not_use_in_prod`, `sk_pinnacle_addie_demo`,
+ *    `sk_meridian_buyer_demo`) for local exploration. Production adopters:
+ *    load credentials from a secrets manager and replace the in-memory
+ *    `TENANTS` map with a transactional store.
+ *
+ * Demonstrates the **account-routed** multi-tenant model: a single AdCP
+ * endpoint hosts multiple specialism agents AND multiple tenants whose
+ * data never crosses. Distinct from `decisioning-platform-multi-tenant.ts`
+ * which uses **host-routed** tenancy via `TenantRegistry` (different
+ * agentUrls per tenant). Both are valid; this one is what a holding
+ * company / agency hub looks like.
+ *
+ * What it shows:
+ *
+ *   - One `DecisioningPlatform` class implementing three specialism
+ *     interfaces: `campaignGovernance`, `propertyLists`, `brandRights`.
+ *   - Per-tenant data partitioning. Plans / lists / rights catalogs /
+ *     grants / brand identity records all keyed by `tenant_id`. A
+ *     plan synced under tenant A is invisible to tenant B's
+ *     `get_plan_audit_logs`.
+ *   - Two tenant resolution paths:
+ *       1. Tools that carry `account` (governance, property-lists) →
+ *          `accounts.resolve(ref)` reads `ref.operator` and maps to
+ *          a tenant. Same buyer credential can hit different tenants
+ *          by varying `account.operator`.
+ *       2. Tools that DON'T carry `account` (`get_brand_identity`,
+ *          `get_rights`) → `accounts.resolve(undefined, ctx)` reads
+ *          the resolved `ctx.agent` (BuyerAgent) and routes to that
+ *          agent's home tenant. Different credentials → different
+ *          views of the catalog without any account field on the wire.
+ *   - Two distinct tenants seeded with overlapping AND distinct data so
+ *     `curl`-driven exploration shows real isolation.
+ *
+ * Demo:
+ *   NODE_ENV=development npx tsx examples/hello_seller_adapter_multi_tenant.ts
+ *
+ *   # As Pinnacle (default storyboard runner credential):
+ *   adcp storyboard run http://127.0.0.1:3003/mcp governance-spend-authority \
+ *     --auth sk_harness_do_not_use_in_prod --allow-http
+ *   adcp storyboard run http://127.0.0.1:3003/mcp brand-rights \
+ *     --auth sk_harness_do_not_use_in_prod --allow-http
+ *
+ *   # As Meridian — different tenant, different rights catalog:
+ *   curl -sH "Authorization: Bearer sk_meridian_buyer_demo" \
+ *        -H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
+ *        -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+ *        --data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/call",
+ *                 "params":{"name":"get_rights",
+ *                 "arguments":{"query":"music sync","uses":["sync"]}}}' \
+ *        http://127.0.0.1:3003/mcp
+ */
+
+import {
+  createAdcpServerFromPlatform,
+  serve,
+  verifyApiKey,
+  createIdempotencyStore,
+  memoryBackend,
+  AdcpError,
+  BuyerAgentRegistry,
+  createTenantStore,
+  narrowAccountRef,
+  defineCampaignGovernancePlatform,
+  definePropertyListsPlatform,
+  defineBrandRightsPlatform,
+  type DecisioningPlatform,
+  type CampaignGovernancePlatform,
+  type PropertyListsPlatform,
+  type BrandRightsPlatform,
+  type AccountStore,
+  type Account,
+  type BuyerAgent,
+  type CachedBuyerAgentRegistry,
+  type RequestContext,
+} from '@adcp/sdk/server';
+import type {
+  CheckGovernanceRequest,
+  CheckGovernanceResponse,
+  SyncPlansRequest,
+  SyncPlansResponse,
+  ReportPlanOutcomeRequest,
+  ReportPlanOutcomeResponse,
+  GetPlanAuditLogsRequest,
+  GetPlanAuditLogsResponse,
+  CreatePropertyListRequest,
+  CreatePropertyListResponse,
+  UpdatePropertyListRequest,
+  UpdatePropertyListResponse,
+  GetPropertyListRequest,
+  GetPropertyListResponse,
+  ListPropertyListsRequest,
+  ListPropertyListsResponse,
+  DeletePropertyListRequest,
+  DeletePropertyListResponse,
+  PropertyList,
+} from '@adcp/sdk/types';
+import type {
+  GetBrandIdentityRequest,
+  GetBrandIdentitySuccess,
+  GetRightsRequest,
+  GetRightsSuccess,
+  AcquireRightsRequest,
+  AcquireRightsAcquired,
+  AcquireRightsRejected,
+  RightUse,
+  RightType,
+} from '@adcp/sdk/types/core.generated';
+import { createHash, randomUUID } from 'node:crypto';
+
+const PORT = Number(process.env['PORT'] ?? 3003);
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Per-tenant data — SWAP for your durable store. Each tenant gets its own
+// brand catalog, rights catalog, plan ledger, property-list store, and
+// account/binding tables. Real adopters key these tables by `tenant_id` in
+// Postgres (or scope by tenant in their ORM); the in-memory shape below is
+// the per-tenant slice the framework hands to handlers via
+// `ctx.account.ctx_metadata.tenant_id`.
+//
+// In-memory module-state has no eviction and no transactional semantics.
+// Production: replace `TENANTS` with row-level reads/writes against a real
+// store, set per-tenant quotas (plans, lists, rights catalogs grow without
+// bound here), and use proper isolation levels for concurrent writers.
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+interface BrandRecord {
+  brand_id: string;
+  house: { domain: string; name: string };
+  names: Array<{ [k: string]: string }>;
+  description?: string;
+}
+
+interface RightsRecord {
+  rights_id: string;
+  brand_id: string;
+  name: string;
+  description: string;
+  available_uses: RightUse[];
+  pricing_option_id: string;
+  price: number;
+  currency: string;
+}
+
+interface StoredPlan {
+  plan_id: string;
+  version: number;
+  budget_total: number;
+  currency: string;
+  custom_policies: Array<{ policy_id: string; enforcement: 'must' | 'should' | 'may'; policy: string }>;
+  audit: AuditEntry[];
+}
+
+interface AuditEntry {
+  timestamp: string;
+  kind: 'check' | 'outcome';
+  check_id?: string;
+  detail: Record<string, unknown>;
+}
+
+interface StoredPropertyList {
+  list: PropertyList;
+  auth_token: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Per-account governance binding. Buyer registers their governance agent
+ * with us (the brand agent) via `sync_governance`. We record the URL +
+ * credentials + the active plan_id we should consult on rights acquisition.
+ * Real adopters store this as an `account_governance_bindings` row keyed by
+ * `(tenant_id, account_key)`.
+ */
+interface GovernanceBinding {
+  governance_agent_url: string;
+  /** Plan id to evaluate against. The wire `sync_governance` payload
+   * doesn't carry plan_id directly — adopters either pre-register a default
+   * plan via `sync_plans` then bind via `sync_governance`, or surface a
+   * 1:1 plan-per-account convention. We pick the latter for the demo:
+   * the most recently synced plan for this tenant becomes the active one. */
+  active_plan_id?: string;
+}
+
+interface TenantState {
+  id: string;
+  display_name: string;
+  brands: Map<string, BrandRecord>;
+  rights: Map<string, RightsRecord>;
+  plans: Map<string, StoredPlan>;
+  propertyLists: Map<string, StoredPropertyList>;
+  /** Accounts the buyer registered via `sync_accounts`. Keyed by
+   * `${operator}::${brand.domain}`. Tenant-scoped so an account
+   * registered under Pinnacle is invisible to Meridian. */
+  accounts: Map<string, { operator: string; brand_domain: string; status: 'active' }>;
+  /** Governance bindings keyed by `brand.domain`. `acquire_rights` doesn't
+   * carry an operator on the wire — only `buyer.domain` (a brand ref) — so
+   * binding lookup on rights acquisition has to key on brand_domain alone.
+   * Tenant scoping is enforced one level up: `getTenant(ctx)` already
+   * narrowed to the right tenant before we ever read this map. */
+  governanceBindings: Map<string, GovernanceBinding>;
+  /** Most recently synced plan per tenant — used as the default when the
+   * brand agent consults governance on `acquire_rights`. Real adopters
+   * bind plan_id to account explicitly. */
+  active_plan_id?: string;
+}
+
+function makeTenant(id: string, displayName: string): TenantState {
+  return {
+    id,
+    display_name: displayName,
+    brands: new Map(),
+    rights: new Map(),
+    plans: new Map(),
+    propertyLists: new Map(),
+    accounts: new Map(),
+    governanceBindings: new Map(),
+  };
+}
+
+function accountKey(operator: string, brandDomain: string): string {
+  return `${operator}::${brandDomain}`;
+}
+
+const TENANTS = new Map<string, TenantState>([
+  ['tenant_pinnacle', makeTenant('tenant_pinnacle', 'Pinnacle Agency (rights + governance)')],
+  ['tenant_meridian', makeTenant('tenant_meridian', 'Meridian Media (rights + governance)')],
+]);
+
+// Tenant 1 (Pinnacle) — talent likeness + AI generation rights for the
+// brand-rights compliance storyboard's `acmeoutdoor.example` buyer.
+const pinnacle = TENANTS.get('tenant_pinnacle')!;
+pinnacle.brands.set('acme_outdoor', {
+  brand_id: 'acme_outdoor',
+  house: { domain: 'acmeinc.example', name: 'Acme Inc.' },
+  names: [{ en_US: 'Acme Outdoor' }],
+  description: 'Acme Outdoor — outdoor gear for everyday explorers.',
+});
+pinnacle.brands.set('test.example', {
+  brand_id: 'test.example',
+  house: { domain: 'test.example', name: 'Test Brand' },
+  names: [{ en_US: 'Test Brand' }],
+  description: 'Storyboard placeholder brand.',
+});
+pinnacle.rights.set('rights_acme_likeness_q2', {
+  rights_id: 'rights_acme_likeness_q2',
+  brand_id: 'acme_outdoor',
+  name: 'Acme Outdoor — likeness + name (Q2)',
+  description: 'Single-quarter license covering likeness and name use in commercial creative.',
+  available_uses: ['likeness', 'name', 'commercial'],
+  pricing_option_id: 'cpm_standard',
+  price: 12.5,
+  currency: 'USD',
+});
+pinnacle.rights.set('rights_ai_generation_universal', {
+  rights_id: 'rights_ai_generation_universal',
+  brand_id: 'test.example',
+  name: 'AI generation license (universal)',
+  description: 'Synthetic-content license covering AI image generation for advertising creative.',
+  available_uses: ['ai_generated_image', 'commercial', 'editorial'],
+  pricing_option_id: 'cpm_ai_generation',
+  price: 8.0,
+  currency: 'USD',
+});
+
+// Tenant 2 (Meridian) — distinct catalog (music sync rights) so cross-tenant
+// reads return DIFFERENT data, not just the same data with a different tenant
+// header. This is what an isolation regression would look like if the
+// per-tenant scoping was wrong.
+const meridian = TENANTS.get('tenant_meridian')!;
+meridian.brands.set('zenith_athletics', {
+  brand_id: 'zenith_athletics',
+  house: { domain: 'zenithcorp.example', name: 'Zenith Corp.' },
+  names: [{ en_US: 'Zenith Athletics' }],
+  description: 'Zenith Athletics — performance apparel.',
+});
+meridian.rights.set('rights_zenith_anthem_sync', {
+  rights_id: 'rights_zenith_anthem_sync',
+  brand_id: 'zenith_athletics',
+  name: 'Zenith — anthem track sync rights',
+  description: 'Music sync license for Zenith brand anthem in TV/CTV creative.',
+  available_uses: ['sync', 'background_music', 'commercial'],
+  pricing_option_id: 'flat_quarterly',
+  price: 25000,
+  currency: 'USD',
+});
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Operator → tenant routing.
+// `accounts.resolve(ref)` reads `ref.operator` and returns the matching
+// tenant. Same buyer credential can hit different tenants by varying
+// `account.operator` on each request.
+// SWAP: in production this is a directory-service lookup or DB row, not
+// a static map. The buyer-tenant authority gate in `accounts.upsert` and
+// `syncGovernanceHandler` depends on this mapping being trustworthy.
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+const OPERATOR_TO_TENANT = new Map<string, string>([
+  ['pinnacle-agency.example', 'tenant_pinnacle'],
+  ['meridian-media.example', 'tenant_meridian'],
+]);
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Buyer-agent registry. Three credentials seeded — three is the lesson:
+//
+//   - `sk_harness_do_not_use_in_prod` — the storyboard runner. Bound to
+//      Pinnacle so `adcp storyboard run … --auth …` exercises tenant 1.
+//      This is a known, well-published token — anyone can grep AdCP repos
+//      for it. Banner at the top of this file says do-not-deploy; this is
+//      where the warning bites.
+//   - `sk_pinnacle_addie_demo` — Pinnacle's own demo buyer. Same tenant as
+//      the harness, distinct principal, separate audit identity.
+//   - `sk_meridian_buyer_demo` — Meridian's demo buyer. Different tenant.
+//      Used in the curl examples in the file header to prove cross-tenant
+//      isolation: same `brand_id` query, different responses.
+//
+// `BUYER_HOME_TENANT` is the side-map used by `accounts.resolve(undefined,
+// ctx)` for no-account tools (`get_brand_identity`, `get_rights`) — the
+// resolver reads `ctx.agent.agent_url`, looks up the buyer's home tenant,
+// and returns the tenant-scoped account. Without this seam, no-account
+// tools would fall through to a global view and leak data across tenants.
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+const PINNACLE_HARNESS_TOKEN = 'sk_harness_do_not_use_in_prod';
+const PINNACLE_DEMO_TOKEN = 'sk_pinnacle_addie_demo';
+const MERIDIAN_DEMO_TOKEN = 'sk_meridian_buyer_demo';
+
+function hashApiKey(token: string): string {
+  return createHash('sha256').update(token).digest('hex').slice(0, 32);
+}
+
+const ADDIE_PINNACLE_URL = 'https://addie.pinnacle.example.com';
+const ADDIE_MERIDIAN_URL = 'https://addie.meridian.example.com';
+
+const ONBOARDING_LEDGER = new Map<string, BuyerAgent>([
+  [
+    hashApiKey(PINNACLE_HARNESS_TOKEN),
+    {
+      agent_url: ADDIE_PINNACLE_URL,
+      display_name: 'Addie (storyboard runner @ Pinnacle)',
+      status: 'active',
+      billing_capabilities: new Set(['operator']),
+      sandbox_only: true,
+    },
+  ],
+  [
+    hashApiKey(PINNACLE_DEMO_TOKEN),
+    {
+      agent_url: ADDIE_PINNACLE_URL,
+      display_name: 'Pinnacle demo buyer',
+      status: 'active',
+      billing_capabilities: new Set(['operator']),
+      sandbox_only: true,
+    },
+  ],
+  [
+    hashApiKey(MERIDIAN_DEMO_TOKEN),
+    {
+      agent_url: ADDIE_MERIDIAN_URL,
+      display_name: 'Meridian demo buyer',
+      status: 'active',
+      billing_capabilities: new Set(['operator']),
+      sandbox_only: true,
+    },
+  ],
+]);
+
+// SWAP: in production this is a row-level join in your buyer-onboarding
+// store, not a static map. The trust seam: `BUYER_HOME_TENANT` is only
+// as trustworthy as the registry's `agent_url` stamp. The bearer-keyed
+// registry below stamps `agent_url` from the seeded ledger row keyed by
+// the SHA-256 hash of the bearer — not buyer-spoofable. If you swap in
+// a registry that takes `agent_url` from a buyer-controlled JWT claim,
+// verify the claim before trusting it for tenant routing.
+const BUYER_HOME_TENANT = new Map<string, string>([
+  [ADDIE_PINNACLE_URL, 'tenant_pinnacle'],
+  [ADDIE_MERIDIAN_URL, 'tenant_meridian'],
+]);
+
+const agentRegistry: CachedBuyerAgentRegistry = BuyerAgentRegistry.cached(
+  BuyerAgentRegistry.bearerOnly({
+    resolveByCredential: async credential => {
+      if (credential.kind !== 'api_key') return null;
+      return ONBOARDING_LEDGER.get(credential.key_id) ?? null;
+    },
+  }),
+  { ttlSeconds: 60 }
+);
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Tenant lookup helper. Throws ACCOUNT_NOT_FOUND if the resolved tenant
+// can't be located — defensive guard against a handler running outside
+// the multi-tenant rails.
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+interface TenantMeta {
+  tenant_id: string;
+  display_name: string;
+  [key: string]: unknown;
+}
+
+function getTenant(ctx: { account: Account<TenantMeta> }): TenantState {
+  const tenantId = ctx.account.ctx_metadata.tenant_id;
+  const tenant = TENANTS.get(tenantId);
+  if (!tenant) {
+    throw new AdcpError('ACCOUNT_NOT_FOUND', {
+      message: `Tenant '${tenantId}' is not provisioned.`,
+    });
+  }
+  return tenant;
+}
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// AdCP-side adapter — typed against three specialism interfaces.
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+class MultiTenantAdapter implements DecisioningPlatform<Record<string, never>, TenantMeta> {
+  capabilities = {
+    specialisms: ['governance-spend-authority', 'property-lists', 'brand-rights'] as const,
+    config: {},
+    // brand-rights claim REQUIRES the brand capability block per
+    // RequiredCapabilitiesFor<'brand-rights'>; framework auto-derives
+    // `rights: true` from the platform impl.
+    brand: {
+      right_types: ['talent', 'brand_ip', 'music'] as RightType[],
+      available_uses: [
+        'likeness',
+        'name',
+        'commercial',
+        'editorial',
+        'ai_generated_image',
+        'sync',
+        'background_music',
+      ] as RightUse[],
+      generation_providers: [],
+      description: 'Multi-tenant hello agent — governance + brand-rights for two demo tenants.',
+    },
+  };
+
+  agentRegistry = agentRegistry;
+
+  /**
+   * Multi-tenant `AccountStore`, built via `createTenantStore`. The helper
+   * canonicalizes the two-path resolution (operator-routed for tools that
+   * carry `account` on the wire; auth-derived for no-account tools) AND
+   * bakes in the per-entry tenant-isolation gate on `sync_accounts` /
+   * `sync_governance` — adopter callbacks (`upsertRow`, `syncGovernanceRow`)
+   * never see a cross-tenant entry.
+   *
+   * Fail-closed: when the auth principal can't be mapped to a tenant
+   * (`resolveFromAuth` returns null), every per-entry call fails
+   * `PERMISSION_DENIED`. Don't fork this around — the prior fail-OPEN
+   * shape (`if (homeTenantId && entryTenant !== homeTenantId)`) silently
+   * disabled isolation for credentials lacking a home tenant.
+   */
+  accounts: AccountStore<TenantMeta> = createTenantStore<TenantState, TenantMeta>({
+    resolveByRef: ref => {
+      const r = narrowAccountRef(ref);
+      if (!r.operator) return null;
+      const tenantId = OPERATOR_TO_TENANT.get(r.operator);
+      return tenantId ? (TENANTS.get(tenantId) ?? null) : null;
+    },
+    resolveFromAuth: ctx => {
+      const tenantId = ctx?.agent ? BUYER_HOME_TENANT.get(ctx.agent.agent_url) : undefined;
+      return tenantId ? (TENANTS.get(tenantId) ?? null) : null;
+    },
+    tenantId: tenant => tenant.id,
+    tenantToAccount: (tenant, ref, ctx) => {
+      const r = narrowAccountRef(ref);
+      // No-account-tool path: synthesize an operator string from the resolved
+      // buyer agent's URL so account.id stays stable per-buyer-per-tenant.
+      const operator = r?.operator ?? ctx?.agent?.agent_url ?? 'derived';
+      return {
+        id: tenant.id,
+        name: r?.operator
+          ? `${tenant.display_name} (${operator})`
+          : `${tenant.display_name} (auth-derived for ${ctx?.agent?.display_name ?? 'unknown'})`,
+        status: 'active',
+        operator,
+        ...(r?.brand?.domain && { brand: { domain: r.brand.domain } }),
+        ctx_metadata: { tenant_id: tenant.id, display_name: tenant.display_name },
+        // SWAP: read sandbox flag from your backing store. Defaults to false
+        // — production adopters route reads/writes to a sandbox backend on
+        // this flag, so an unset wire field MUST NOT silently land in
+        // sandbox. Buyers who want sandbox set `account.sandbox = true`
+        // explicitly.
+        sandbox: r?.sandbox ?? false,
+      };
+    },
+    upsertRow: (tenant, ref, _ctx) => {
+      // Cross-tenant entries never reach this callback — the helper's
+      // gate already filtered them. Adopter responsibility: the upsert
+      // itself.
+      const r = narrowAccountRef(ref);
+      const operator = r.operator!;
+      const brandDomain = r.brand!.domain!;
+      const key = accountKey(operator, brandDomain);
+      // SWAP: row-level write under tenant transaction.
+      const action = tenant.accounts.has(key) ? ('updated' as const) : ('created' as const);
+      tenant.accounts.set(key, { operator, brand_domain: brandDomain, status: 'active' });
+      return {
+        account_id: tenant.id,
+        brand: { domain: brandDomain },
+        operator,
+        action,
+        status: 'active' as const,
+      };
+    },
+    syncGovernanceRow: (tenant, entry, _ctx) => {
+      // Cross-tenant entries never reach this callback. Hello-adapter
+      // shortcut: bind on the brand_domain key, record the first agent's
+      // URL + the most-recently-synced plan as the active binding.
+      // Production adopters MUST persist
+      // `entry.governance_agents[i].authentication.credentials` (the
+      // framework strips them from the response — see
+      // `toWireSyncGovernanceRow` — so the buyer never sees them echoed).
+      const r = narrowAccountRef(entry.account);
+      const brandDomain = r.brand?.domain;
+      const govUrl = entry.governance_agents[0]?.url;
+      if (brandDomain) {
+        if (govUrl) {
+          // ⚠️ Brand-keyed binding: two operators in the same tenant
+          // hitting the same brand SHARE this binding. `acquire_rights`
+          // doesn't carry an operator on the wire (only `buyer.domain` —
+          // tracked in adcp#3918), so brand is all we have to key on
+          // inside one tenant. Surface a warn when an existing binding
+          // gets overwritten so adopters notice the symptom early —
+          // production adopters either move to per-(operator, brand)
+          // bindings or accept tenant-scoped brand uniqueness as policy.
+          const prior = tenant.governanceBindings.get(brandDomain);
+          if (prior && prior.governance_agent_url !== govUrl) {
+            console.warn(
+              `[multi-tenant] tenant=${tenant.id} brand=${brandDomain} governance binding overwritten ` +
+                `(${prior.governance_agent_url} → ${govUrl}). Two operators sharing one brand within a tenant ` +
+                `share one binding — see adcontextprotocol/adcp#3918.`
+            );
+          }
+          // SWAP: row-level write under tenant transaction.
+          tenant.governanceBindings.set(brandDomain, {
+            governance_agent_url: govUrl,
+            active_plan_id: tenant.active_plan_id,
+          });
+        } else {
+          tenant.governanceBindings.delete(brandDomain);
+        }
+      }
+      const echoedAgents = entry.governance_agents.map(a => ({
+        url: a.url,
+        ...(a.categories && { categories: a.categories }),
+      }));
+      return {
+        account: entry.account,
+        status: 'synced' as const,
+        ...(echoedAgents.length > 0 && { governance_agents: echoedAgents }),
+      };
+    },
+  });
+
+  campaignGovernance: CampaignGovernancePlatform<TenantMeta> = defineCampaignGovernancePlatform<TenantMeta>({
+    syncPlans: async (req: SyncPlansRequest, ctx): Promise<SyncPlansResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const plans = (req.plans ?? []).map(p => {
+        const existing = tenant.plans.get(p.plan_id);
+        const version = existing ? existing.version + 1 : 1;
+        const budget = (p.budget ?? {}) as { total?: number; currency?: string };
+        const stored: StoredPlan = {
+          plan_id: p.plan_id,
+          version,
+          budget_total: budget.total ?? 0,
+          currency: budget.currency ?? 'USD',
+          custom_policies: (p.custom_policies ?? []).map(cp => ({
+            policy_id: cp.policy_id,
+            enforcement: cp.enforcement,
+            policy: cp.policy,
+          })),
+          audit: existing?.audit ?? [],
+        };
+        tenant.plans.set(p.plan_id, stored);
+        return { plan_id: p.plan_id, status: 'active' as const, version };
+      });
+      // First-plan-wins convention for the auto-bind on `sync_governance`.
+      // Set once, deterministically, AFTER the loop — last-wins inside the
+      // map is order-dependent garbage when buyers sync multiple plans.
+      // Real adopters bind plan_id to account explicitly via the buyer's
+      // compliance configuration; this fallback only fires when
+      // `sync_governance` is called WITHOUT an explicit binding for a
+      // pre-existing plan.
+      const firstNew = (req.plans ?? [])[0]?.plan_id;
+      if (firstNew && !tenant.active_plan_id) tenant.active_plan_id = firstNew;
+      return { plans };
+    },
+
+    checkGovernance: async (req: CheckGovernanceRequest, ctx): Promise<CheckGovernanceResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const plan = tenant.plans.get(req.plan_id);
+      if (!plan) {
+        throw new AdcpError('PLAN_NOT_FOUND', {
+          message: `Unknown plan: ${req.plan_id}`,
+          field: 'plan_id',
+        });
+      }
+      const checkId = randomUUID();
+      const proposed =
+        (req.payload as { total_budget?: number; packages?: Array<{ budget?: number }> } | undefined) ?? {};
+      const proposedBudget =
+        typeof proposed.total_budget === 'number'
+          ? proposed.total_budget
+          : (proposed.packages ?? []).reduce((s, p) => s + (p.budget ?? 0), 0);
+
+      const overBudget = proposedBudget > plan.budget_total;
+      const status = overBudget ? 'denied' : plan.custom_policies.length > 0 ? 'conditions' : 'approved';
+
+      const response: CheckGovernanceResponse = {
+        check_id: checkId,
+        status,
+        plan_id: plan.plan_id,
+        explanation: overBudget
+          ? `Proposed spend ${proposedBudget} ${plan.currency} exceeds plan budget ${plan.budget_total} ${plan.currency}.`
+          : status === 'conditions'
+            ? 'Approved with custom policy conditions.'
+            : 'Approved.',
+        ...(status === 'denied' && {
+          findings: [
+            {
+              category_id: 'budget_compliance',
+              severity: 'critical' as const,
+              explanation: `Proposed spend ${proposedBudget} exceeds plan budget ${plan.budget_total}.`,
+            },
+          ],
+        }),
+        ...(status === 'conditions' && {
+          conditions: plan.custom_policies.map(p => ({
+            field: `payload.${p.policy_id}`,
+            reason: p.policy,
+          })),
+        }),
+        ...(status !== 'denied' && {
+          governance_context: `gov_ctx_${plan.plan_id}_${checkId}`,
+          expires_at: new Date(Date.now() + 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString(),
+        }),
+      };
+
+      plan.audit.push({
+        timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+        kind: 'check',
+        check_id: checkId,
+        detail: { status, proposed_budget: proposedBudget },
+      });
+      return response;
+    },
+
+    reportPlanOutcome: async (req: ReportPlanOutcomeRequest, ctx): Promise<ReportPlanOutcomeResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const plan = tenant.plans.get(req.plan_id);
+      if (!plan) {
+        throw new AdcpError('PLAN_NOT_FOUND', {
+          message: `Unknown plan: ${req.plan_id}`,
+          field: 'plan_id',
+        });
+      }
+      const committed = req.seller_response?.committed_budget ?? 0;
+      plan.audit.push({
+        timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+        kind: 'outcome',
+        check_id: req.check_id,
+        detail: { outcome: req.outcome, purchase_type: req.purchase_type, committed_budget: committed },
+      });
+      return {
+        outcome_id: randomUUID(),
+        status: 'accepted',
+        committed_budget: committed,
+        plan_summary: {
+          total_committed: committed,
+          budget_remaining: Math.max(0, plan.budget_total - committed),
+        },
+      };
+    },
+
+    getPlanAuditLogs: async (req: GetPlanAuditLogsRequest, ctx): Promise<GetPlanAuditLogsResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const ids = req.plan_ids ?? [];
+      const plans = ids.map(id => {
+        const plan = tenant.plans.get(id);
+        if (!plan) {
+          throw new AdcpError('PLAN_NOT_FOUND', { message: `Unknown plan: ${id}`, field: 'plan_ids' });
+        }
+        const checks = plan.audit.filter(a => a.kind === 'check').length;
+        const outcomes = plan.audit.filter(a => a.kind === 'outcome').length;
+        return {
+          plan_id: plan.plan_id,
+          plan_version: plan.version,
+          status: 'active' as const,
+          budget: { authorized: plan.budget_total },
+          summary: { checks_performed: checks, outcomes_reported: outcomes },
+          governed_actions: [],
+        };
+      });
+      return { plans };
+    },
+  });
+
+  propertyLists: PropertyListsPlatform<TenantMeta> = definePropertyListsPlatform<TenantMeta>({
+    createPropertyList: async (req: CreatePropertyListRequest, ctx): Promise<CreatePropertyListResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const listId = `pl_${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}`;
+      const now = new Date().toISOString();
+      const list: PropertyList = {
+        list_id: listId,
+        name: req.name,
+        ...(req.description && { description: req.description }),
+        ...(req.account && { account: req.account }),
+        ...(req.base_properties && { base_properties: req.base_properties }),
+        ...(req.filters && { filters: req.filters }),
+        ...(req.brand && { brand: req.brand }),
+        cache_duration_hours: 24,
+        created_at: now,
+        updated_at: now,
+        property_count: 0,
+      };
+      const auth_token = `pltok_${randomUUID().replace(/-/g, '')}`;
+      tenant.propertyLists.set(listId, { list, auth_token });
+      return { list, auth_token };
+    },
+
+    updatePropertyList: async (req: UpdatePropertyListRequest, ctx): Promise<UpdatePropertyListResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const stored = tenant.propertyLists.get(req.list_id);
+      if (!stored) {
+        throw new AdcpError('REFERENCE_NOT_FOUND', {
+          message: `Unknown property list: ${req.list_id}`,
+          field: 'list_id',
+        });
+      }
+      const updated: PropertyList = {
+        ...stored.list,
+        ...(req.name !== undefined && { name: req.name }),
+        ...(req.description !== undefined && { description: req.description }),
+        ...(req.base_properties !== undefined && { base_properties: req.base_properties }),
+        ...(req.filters !== undefined && { filters: req.filters }),
+        ...(req.brand !== undefined && { brand: req.brand }),
+        updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+      };
+      stored.list = updated;
+      return { list: updated };
+    },
+
+    getPropertyList: async (req: GetPropertyListRequest, ctx): Promise<GetPropertyListResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const stored = tenant.propertyLists.get(req.list_id);
+      if (!stored) {
+        throw new AdcpError('REFERENCE_NOT_FOUND', {
+          message: `Unknown property list: ${req.list_id}`,
+          field: 'list_id',
+        });
+      }
+      return {
+        list: stored.list,
+        identifiers: [],
+        resolved_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+        cache_valid_until: new Date(Date.now() + 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString(),
+      };
+    },
+
+    listPropertyLists: async (req: ListPropertyListsRequest, ctx): Promise<ListPropertyListsResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const all = Array.from(tenant.propertyLists.values()).map(s => s.list);
+      const filtered = req.name_contains
+        ? all.filter(l => l.name.toLowerCase().includes(req.name_contains!.toLowerCase()))
+        : all;
+      return { lists: filtered };
+    },
+
+    deletePropertyList: async (req: DeletePropertyListRequest, ctx): Promise<DeletePropertyListResponse> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const existed = tenant.propertyLists.delete(req.list_id);
+      return { deleted: existed, list_id: req.list_id };
+    },
+  });
+
+  brandRights: BrandRightsPlatform<TenantMeta> = defineBrandRightsPlatform<TenantMeta>({
+    getBrandIdentity: async (req: GetBrandIdentityRequest, ctx): Promise<GetBrandIdentitySuccess> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const brand = tenant.brands.get(req.brand_id);
+      if (!brand) {
+        throw new AdcpError('REFERENCE_NOT_FOUND', {
+          message: `Unknown brand: ${req.brand_id}`,
+          field: 'brand_id',
+        });
+      }
+      return {
+        brand_id: brand.brand_id,
+        house: brand.house,
+        names: brand.names,
+        ...(brand.description && { description: brand.description }),
+      };
+    },
+
+    getRights: async (req: GetRightsRequest, ctx): Promise<GetRightsSuccess> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const requestedUses = new Set(req.uses);
+      const matches = Array.from(tenant.rights.values()).filter(r => {
+        if (req.brand_id && r.brand_id !== req.brand_id) return false;
+        return r.available_uses.some(u => requestedUses.has(u));
+      });
+      return {
+        rights: matches.map(r => ({
+          rights_id: r.rights_id,
+          brand_id: r.brand_id,
+          name: r.name,
+          description: r.description,
+          available_uses: r.available_uses,
+          pricing_options: [
+            {
+              pricing_option_id: r.pricing_option_id,
+              model: 'cpm',
+              price: r.price,
+              currency: r.currency,
+              uses: r.available_uses,
+            },
+          ],
+        })),
+      };
+    },
+
+    acquireRights: async (req: AcquireRightsRequest, ctx): Promise<AcquireRightsAcquired | AcquireRightsRejected> => {
+      const tenant = getTenant(ctx);
+      const offering = tenant.rights.get(req.rights_id);
+      if (!offering) {
+        throw new AdcpError('REFERENCE_NOT_FOUND', {
+          message: `Unknown rights offering: ${req.rights_id}`,
+          field: 'rights_id',
+        });
+      }
+      if (req.pricing_option_id !== offering.pricing_option_id) {
+        throw new AdcpError('INVALID_REQUEST', {
+          message: `Unknown pricing_option_id: ${req.pricing_option_id}`,
+          field: 'pricing_option_id',
+        });
+      }
+      // Spec: brand agents MUST reject with INVALID_REQUEST (field:
+      // campaign.end_date) when end_date is in the past — acquiring
+      // rights for an elapsed window produces a zero-duration grant.
+      // See acquire-rights-request.json campaign.end_date description.
+      if (req.campaign.end_date && Date.parse(req.campaign.end_date) < Date.now()) {
+        throw new AdcpError('INVALID_REQUEST', {
+          message: `campaign.end_date '${req.campaign.end_date}' is in the past — rights cannot be acquired for an elapsed window.`,
+          field: 'campaign.end_date',
+        });
+      }
+      // Validation seam: when an explicit governance binding exists for
+      // this brand, projecting CPM spend will need `estimated_impressions`.
+      // Hoisted from `enforceGovernance` so the request-validation MUSTs
+      // sit at the boundary rather than nested under enforcement logic.
+      // Spec wording (acquire-rights-request.json:64) MUSTs this only
+      // under intent-phase `governance_context` + CPM; the broader gate
+      // here is conservative — when this adapter holds a registered
+      // binding, projecting spend without impressions silently grants
+      // under-priced rights. Tighten if your offerings are mixed-pricing
+      // or your governance flow uses `governance_context` tokens.
+      const hasBinding = tenant.governanceBindings.has(req.buyer.domain);
+      if (hasBinding && (req.campaign.estimated_impressions == null || req.campaign.estimated_impressions <= 0)) {
+        throw new AdcpError('INVALID_REQUEST', {
+          message:
+            'campaign.estimated_impressions is required when acquiring CPM-priced rights under a registered governance plan.',
+          field: 'campaign.estimated_impressions',
+        });
+      }
+      const denial = await this.enforceGovernance(tenant, ctx, offering, req);
+      if (denial) return denial;
+      const offered = new Set(offering.available_uses);
+      const unsupported = req.campaign.uses.filter(u => !offered.has(u));
+      if (unsupported.length > 0) {
+        return {
+          rights_id: offering.rights_id,
+          status: 'rejected',
+          brand_id: offering.brand_id,
+          reason: `Requested uses [${unsupported.join(', ')}] are not covered by offering ${offering.rights_id}.`,
+          suggestions: [`This offering covers: ${offering.available_uses.join(', ')}.`],
+        };
+      }
+      // Real adopters persist the grant here — payment record, rights
+      // ledger entry, audit row. The hello adapter doesn't expose a
+      // read tool over the grant ledger so we skip the write. Add
+      // tenant-scoped persistence when wiring a real backend.
+      return {
+        rights_id: offering.rights_id,
+        status: 'acquired',
+        brand_id: offering.brand_id,
+        terms: {
+          pricing_option_id: offering.pricing_option_id,
+          amount: offering.price,
+          currency: offering.currency,
+          uses: req.campaign.uses,
+          ...(req.campaign.start_date && { start_date: req.campaign.start_date }),
+          ...(req.campaign.end_date && { end_date: req.campaign.end_date }),
+        },
+        generation_credentials: [],
+        rights_constraint: {
+          rights_id: offering.rights_id,
+          rights_agent: { url: `http://127.0.0.1:${PORT}/mcp`, id: 'hello-multi-tenant-adapter' },
+          uses: req.campaign.uses,
+          ...(req.campaign.start_date && { valid_from: toDateTime(req.campaign.start_date, 'start') }),
+          ...(req.campaign.end_date && { valid_until: toDateTime(req.campaign.end_date, 'end') }),
+        },
+      };
+    },
+  });
+
+  /**
+   * Cross-specialism governance check. Called from `acquireRights` after
+   * the validation seam has already enforced `estimated_impressions` for
+   * binding-aware paths. Returns `AcquireRightsRejected` on denial,
+   * `null` otherwise (no binding, approved, or conditions — rights flow
+   * proceeds either way).
+   *
+   * **Same-tenant invariant**: this method dispatches `checkGovernance`
+   * via `this.campaignGovernance` and forwards the same `ctx`. Both
+   * specialisms share `getTenant(ctx)` here by construction (single
+   * adapter instance, single tenant resolved per request). If a future
+   * deployment splits brand-rights and governance into different tenants
+   * — or registers a remote governance agent and dials out via the
+   * @adcp/sdk client — this in-process short-circuit no longer applies
+   * and the assumption needs revisiting.
+   *
+   * **⚠️  DO NOT copy this into a single-specialism brand-rights agent.**
+   * Without a co-resident `campaignGovernance` handler, the in-process
+   * call has nothing to dispatch to. Single-specialism adopters must
+   * dial out to the registered governance agent's URL via the
+   * @adcp/sdk client instead, supplying the credentials persisted
+   * during `sync_governance` (this adapter drops them — see
+   * `syncGovernanceHandler`).
+   *
+   * Uses `ctx.account` (framework-resolved tenant account) — never
+   * re-parses operator/brand from the request body, since that would
+   * skip the framework's auth-derived tenant resolution.
+   */
+  private async enforceGovernance(
+    tenant: TenantState,
+    ctx: RequestContext<Account<TenantMeta>>,
+    offering: RightsRecord,
+    req: AcquireRightsRequest
+  ): Promise<AcquireRightsRejected | null> {
+    // `acquire_rights` carries `buyer: BrandReference` (not an `account`
+    // field — see AcquireRightsRequest schema). Bindings are keyed by
+    // brand_domain inside the tenant so we look up against
+    // `req.buyer.domain`. Tenant scoping is upstream: `getTenant(ctx)`
+    // narrowed by auth-derived account before we got here.
+    //
+    // Limitation: keying solely on brand_domain means two buyers from
+    // different operators within the same tenant targeting the same
+    // brand will share a binding. Filed as adcontextprotocol/adcp#3918
+    // (add `account: AccountReference` to AcquireRightsRequest); until
+    // that lands, this is a hello-adapter scoping shortcut, not a
+    // production-grade resolution.
+    const brandDomain = req.buyer?.domain;
+    if (!brandDomain) return null;
+    const binding = tenant.governanceBindings.get(brandDomain);
+    if (!binding?.active_plan_id) return null;
+    const planId = binding.active_plan_id;
+    if (!tenant.plans.has(planId)) return null;
+
+    // `estimated_impressions` is enforced at the validation seam in
+    // `acquireRights` before we get here — this is just the projection.
+    const estimatedSpend = (offering.price * req.campaign.estimated_impressions!) / 1000;
+
+    const govResp = await this.campaignGovernance.checkGovernance(
+      {
+        plan_id: planId,
+        caller: `http://127.0.0.1:${PORT}/mcp`,
+        tool: 'acquire_rights',
+        purchase_type: 'rights_license',
+        payload: { total_budget: estimatedSpend },
+      },
+      ctx
+    );
+    if (govResp.status !== 'denied') return null;
+
+    // Spec-correct denial shape: `AcquireRightsRejected` with `reason`
+    // (and optional `suggestions`). Don't echo the buyer-controlled
+    // `governance_agent_url` from the binding — adopters who copied
+    // that into the response shipped a small prompt-injection vector
+    // (URL planted by one buyer surfaced to another). Forensic detail
+    // belongs in server-side logs, not the buyer envelope.
+    return {
+      rights_id: offering.rights_id,
+      status: 'rejected',
+      brand_id: offering.brand_id,
+      reason: `Denied by governance plan ${planId}: ${govResp.explanation}`,
+      ...(govResp.findings &&
+        govResp.findings.length > 0 && {
+          suggestions: govResp.findings.map(f => `[${f.severity}] ${f.category_id}: ${f.explanation}`),
+        }),
+    };
+  }
+}
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Helpers
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+function toDateTime(value: string, edge: 'start' | 'end'): string {
+  if (/T/.test(value)) return value;
+  return `${value}T${edge === 'start' ? '00:00:00.000Z' : '23:59:59.999Z'}`;
+}
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Boot
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+const platform = new MultiTenantAdapter();
+const idempotencyStore = createIdempotencyStore({ backend: memoryBackend(), ttlSeconds: 86_400 });
+
+serve(
+  ({ taskStore }) =>
+    createAdcpServerFromPlatform(platform, {
+      name: 'hello-seller-adapter-multi-tenant',
+      version: '1.0.0',
+      taskStore,
+      idempotency: idempotencyStore,
+      resolveSessionKey: ctx => {
+        const acct = ctx.account as Account<TenantMeta> | undefined;
+        return acct?.id ?? 'anonymous';
+      },
+    }),
+  {
+    port: PORT,
+    authenticate: verifyApiKey({
+      keys: {
+        [PINNACLE_HARNESS_TOKEN]: { principal: 'compliance-runner@pinnacle' },
+        [PINNACLE_DEMO_TOKEN]: { principal: 'demo-buyer@pinnacle' },
+        [MERIDIAN_DEMO_TOKEN]: { principal: 'demo-buyer@meridian' },
+      },
+    }),
+  }
+);
+
+console.log(`multi-tenant adapter on http://127.0.0.1:${PORT}/mcp`);
+console.log(`  tenants: ${Array.from(TENANTS.keys()).join(', ')}`);
+console.log(`  operators: ${Array.from(OPERATOR_TO_TENANT.keys()).join(', ')}`);
+console.log(`  credentials (3 = 1 harness pinned for storyboards + 2 demo buyers, one per tenant):`);
+console.log(`    ${PINNACLE_HARNESS_TOKEN} → tenant_pinnacle (storyboard runner)`);
+console.log(`    ${PINNACLE_DEMO_TOKEN} → tenant_pinnacle`);
+console.log(`    ${MERIDIAN_DEMO_TOKEN} → tenant_meridian`);