@7365admin1/layer-common 4.97.1-staging.502 → 4.98.0

package/components/HidUserEnrollment.vue

@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
                access is bound by user id, so there is nothing to bind. The note
                below says how many were left out rather than letting a missing
                colleague read as a bug. -->
-          <template v-if="!selectedUser && isMemberSubject">
+          <template v-if="!selectedUser && !isResidentSubject">
             <div class="field-label">Member <span>*</span></div>
             <AppSelect
               v-model="form.subjectId"
@@ -389,59 +389,6 @@
             </p>
           </template>
 
-          <!-- SERVICE PROVIDER STAFF. One person from a provider company, and
-               never the company: granting a company puts every employee of the
-               firm on the door, including the ones who do not attend this site.
-               The list, the service filter and the filter's "All services"
-               default are the Members > Service Providers screen's own, from the
-               same endpoint and through the same `filterProviderMembers` rule,
-               so the two screens cannot disagree about who works here.
-               Unpaged - the endpoint returns the site's people in one response -
-               so searching and filtering cost no request. -->
-          <template v-if="!selectedUser && isProviderSubject">
-            <div class="field-label">Service</div>
-            <AppSelect
-              v-model="providerService"
-              :items="providerServiceOptions"
-              klass="mb-3"
-              @update:model-value="onProviderServiceChanged"
-            />
-
-            <div class="field-label">Person <span>*</span></div>
-            <AppSelect
-              v-model="form.subjectId"
-              :items="providerOptions"
-              searchable
-              search-placeholder="Search by name, company or role"
-              :placeholder="providerPlaceholder"
-              klass="mb-3"
-              @update:model-value="onProviderChanged"
-            />
-
-            <!-- ACCESS ONLY, and the button says so. Shown here and nowhere
-                 else: it is the one subject type that arrives a shift at a time,
-                 and the people it adds fill in their own credentials from their
-                 app afterwards. -->
-            <div class="hid-bulk-cta mb-3">
-              <AppButton
-                variant="ghost"
-                icon="mdi-account-multiple-plus-outline"
-                :disabled="loadingProviders"
-                @click="openBulkAdd"
-              >
-                Add Users in Bulk
-              </AppButton>
-              <span class="field-hint">
-                Gives access to many people at once. They add their own face, QR
-                or PIN from their app.
-              </span>
-            </div>
-
-            <p v-if="hiddenProviderNote" class="field-hint mb-3">
-              {{ hiddenProviderNote }}
-            </p>
-          </template>
-
           <!-- The duplicate check. It is reader-scoped: this resident holding a
                HID user on another gate is normal and says nothing here. -->
           <p v-if="checkingResident" class="field-hint">
@@ -465,12 +412,12 @@
                whatever the reader already holds. -->
           <!-- A mirror of the chosen member's role, on the same rule as Name:
                restated from the record, never collected. -->
-          <template v-if="!selectedUser && isPersonSubject">
-            <div class="field-label">{{ subjectMirrorLabel }}</div>
+          <template v-if="!selectedUser && !isResidentSubject">
+            <div class="field-label">Role</div>
             <AppField
               v-model="form.subjectRole"
-              :aria-label="subjectMirrorLabel"
-              :placeholder="subjectMirrorPlaceholder"
+              aria-label="Role"
+              placeholder="Select a member above"
               readonly
               klass="mb-3"
             />
@@ -483,8 +430,6 @@
             :placeholder="
               isResidentSubject
                 ? 'Select a resident above'
-                : isProviderSubject
-                ? 'Select a person above'
                 : 'Select a member above'
             "
             readonly
@@ -622,115 +567,6 @@
       </v-card>
     </v-dialog>
 
-    <!-- ADD USERS IN BULK.
-         Over the enrolment form, not instead of it: the operator came here to
-         enrol, and this is the shortcut for the case where a whole shift arrives
-         at once. It grants ACCESS only - the people it adds are recognised by the
-         reader once they add a face, QR or PIN from their own app - which is why
-         it collects no photo, PIN or password.
-         The table is the same list as the picker behind it, under the same
-         service filter, with Company / Name / Service and nothing else: the
-         Members screen's other columns say nothing about whether to open a door
-         for somebody. -->
-    <v-dialog v-model="bulkDialog" max-width="640" persistent>
-      <v-card class="screen-modal">
-        <v-card-title>Add Users in Bulk</v-card-title>
-        <v-card-text class="screen-modal__body">
-          <p class="field-hint mb-3">
-            Gives these people access to
-            <strong>{{ bulkReaderLabel }}</strong>. They add their own face, QR
-            or PIN from their app - nothing is enrolled on the reader here.
-          </p>
-
-          <AppField
-            v-model="bulkSearch"
-            aria-label="Search people"
-            placeholder="Search by name, company or role"
-            klass="mb-3"
-          />
-
-          <v-progress-linear v-if="bulkLoading" indeterminate class="mb-3" />
-
-          <template v-else-if="bulkRows.length">
-            <v-table density="compact" class="hid-bulk-table mb-2">
-              <thead>
-                <tr>
-                  <th class="hid-bulk-table__check">
-                    <!-- Acts on the rows in front of you - what the service
-                         filter and the search have left - never on the whole
-                         estate. -->
-                    <v-checkbox
-                      :model-value="bulkAllSelected"
-                      :disabled="!bulkSelectableRows.length"
-                      hide-details
-                      density="compact"
-                      aria-label="Select everyone listed"
-                      @update:model-value="toggleBulkAll"
-                    />
-                  </th>
-                  <th>Company</th>
-                  <th>Name</th>
-                  <th>Service</th>
-                </tr>
-              </thead>
-              <tbody>
-                <tr v-for="row in bulkRows" :key="row.subjectId">
-                  <td class="hid-bulk-table__check">
-                    <!-- Already on the door: ticked and locked. Unticking here
-                         would revoke access, and this dialog does not revoke. -->
-                    <v-checkbox
-                      :model-value="row.granted || isBulkSelected(row.subjectId)"
-                      :disabled="row.granted"
-                      hide-details
-                      density="compact"
-                      :aria-label="`Select ${row.name}`"
-                      @update:model-value="toggleBulkRow(row.subjectId, $event)"
-                    />
-                  </td>
-                  <td>{{ row.company || "—" }}</td>
-                  <td>
-                    {{ row.name }}
-                    <span v-if="row.granted" class="hid-bulk-granted">
-                      Already has access
-                    </span>
-                  </td>
-                  <td>{{ row.service || "—" }}</td>
-                </tr>
-              </tbody>
-            </v-table>
-            <p class="field-hint">
-              {{ bulkSelectedCount }} selected<template v-if="bulkGrantedCount">
-                · {{ bulkGrantedCount }} already have access</template
-              >
-            </p>
-          </template>
-
-          <v-alert v-else type="info" variant="tonal" density="compact">
-            {{ bulkEmptyText }}
-          </v-alert>
-        </v-card-text>
-        <v-card-actions class="screen-modal__footer">
-          <v-btn
-            class="text-none screen-btn-ghost"
-            variant="flat"
-            :disabled="bulkSaving"
-            @click="bulkDialog = false"
-          >
-            Cancel
-          </v-btn>
-          <v-btn
-            class="text-none screen-btn-primary"
-            variant="flat"
-            :loading="bulkSaving"
-            :disabled="!bulkSelectedCount"
-            @click="saveBulkAdd"
-          >
-            Give access
-          </v-btn>
-        </v-card-actions>
-      </v-card>
-    </v-dialog>
-
     <HidCameraCaptureDialog v-model="cameraDialog" @capture="onCameraCapture" />
 
     <v-dialog v-model="viewDialog" max-width="430">
@@ -968,36 +804,9 @@ import {
   hiddenSubjectNote,
   memberCandidateOf,
   memberHasAccount,
-  HID_ALL_SERVICES,
-  enrolmentSubjectOfCategory,
-  permissionCategoryOf,
-  providerAccountsKnown,
-  providerCandidateOf,
-  providerEnrollableRows,
   readMemberPage,
-  serviceFilterOf,
   subjectCategoryLabel as labelForSubjectCategory,
-  subjectLinkOf,
-  type HidEnrolmentSubject,
 } from "../utils/hid-enrolment-subject";
-/* The SAME filter the Members > Service Providers screen applies, not a second
-   copy of the rule: a picker that disagrees with the screen the operator was
-   just looking at is a picker they cannot trust. Core applies it to the Excel
-   export too (`filterSiteProviderMembers`). */
-import {
-  filterProviderMembers,
-  serviceTypeOptions,
-} from "../utils/site-provider-members";
-/* Bulk access is granted through the permissions document, and the PUT REPLACES
-   this reader's whole assignment set. These three are what keep a bulk add from
-   revoking everybody who was already on the door - see the file's own header. */
-import {
-  seedAssignments,
-  setAssignment,
-  subjectOfIdentity,
-  toAssignmentPayload,
-  type HidAssignmentState,
-} from "../utils/hid-permission-assignments";
 
 const props = defineProps({
   site: {
@@ -1038,13 +847,8 @@ const {
   createIdentity,
   updateIdentity,
   deleteIdentity,
-  getSitePermissions,
-  updateSitePermissions,
 } = useHidAmico();
 const { getAll: getAllMembers } = useMember();
-/* Members > Service Providers reads this same call, so the enrolment picker
-   offers exactly the people that screen lists. Site-scoped by the server. */
-const { getSiteMembers } = useServiceProvider();
 const runtimeConfig = useRuntimeConfig();
 
 type HidMetadata = Record<string, unknown> & {
@@ -1230,11 +1034,7 @@ type UnitPerson = {
  * the dialog, and `useHidReaderSelection` already set the precedent for where
  * that line sits.
  */
-/* The dropdown's values, plus `service_provider` - which the dropdown does not
-   offer but `openEdit` resolves from records that name a COMPANY. */
-type TEnrolmentSubjectValue = HidEnrolmentSubject | "service_provider";
-
-const REMEMBERED_SUBJECT_CATEGORY = ref<HidEnrolmentSubject>("resident");
+const REMEMBERED_SUBJECT_CATEGORY = ref<THidPermissionCategory>("resident");
 
 const form = reactive({
   reader: "",
@@ -1248,7 +1048,7 @@ const form = reactive({
   accessPin: "",
   password: "",
   photoPreview: "",
-  subjectCategory: REMEMBERED_SUBJECT_CATEGORY.value as TEnrolmentSubjectValue,
+  subjectCategory: REMEMBERED_SUBJECT_CATEGORY.value,
   subjectId: "",
   /** A mirror of the chosen member's role. Never sent; display only. */
   subjectRole: "",
@@ -1370,28 +1170,6 @@ const unitResidentNote = computed(() => {
 const subjectCategoryOptions = HID_ENROLMENT_SUBJECTS;
 
 const isResidentSubject = computed(() => form.subjectCategory === "resident");
-/* Members and provider staff both pick ONE PERSON from a flat list, but from
-   different lists, so they are separate branches rather than "not a resident". */
-const isMemberSubject = computed(
-  () => form.subjectCategory === "property_management"
-);
-const isProviderSubject = computed(
-  () => form.subjectCategory === "service_provider_staff"
-);
-/** Either of the two person pickers - what the Role mirror follows. */
-const isPersonSubject = computed(
-  () => isMemberSubject.value || isProviderSubject.value
-);
-
-/* The mirror's label follows the list it mirrors. A member's subtitle is their
-   role at the site; a contractor's is the firm they work for, and calling that
-   "Role" would read as a mistake. */
-const subjectMirrorLabel = computed(() =>
-  isProviderSubject.value ? "Company" : "Role"
-);
-const subjectMirrorPlaceholder = computed(() =>
-  isProviderSubject.value ? "Select a person above" : "Select a member above"
-);
 
 /* What an EDIT shows in place of the control, since the type cannot change.
    Looked up in the util, not in the switch's own options: records carry
@@ -1585,387 +1363,6 @@ function loadMoreMembers() {
   return fetchMemberPage(memberPage.value + 1, true);
 }
 
-/* ── SERVICE PROVIDER STAFF ───────────────────────────────────────────────
- *
- * ONE PERSON from a provider company, never the company.
- *
- * Read from `GET /api/service-providers/site-members` - the same call behind
- * Members > Service Providers, with the same `filterProviderMembers` rule - so
- * the picker lists exactly the people that screen lists. The server scopes it to
- * the site; these are the contractors who attend THIS site, not every employee
- * of every firm engaged with the organisation.
- *
- * Unpaged, deliberately, unlike the staff picker above: this endpoint returns
- * the site's people in one response (capped at 1000 by the repository) and has
- * no per-page cache entry to disagree with. The service filter and the search
- * box both run over the loaded list, so neither costs a request.
- */
-const providerPeople = ref<Record<string, unknown>[]>([]);
-const providerCompanyCount = ref(0);
-const loadingProviders = ref(false);
-const providersLoaded = ref(false);
-/**
- * All services is the default, the same as the Members screen - but it carries a
- * REAL value here, not "". `AppSelect`'s `hasSingleValue` is false for an empty
- * string, so an empty-valued option draws the placeholder in placeholder grey and
- * is never marked as chosen: the filter worked and the field looked blank. See
- * `serviceFilterOf`.
- */
-const providerService = ref<string>(HID_ALL_SERVICES);
-
-/** What the filter actually receives: "" for All services. */
-const providerServiceFilter = computed(() => serviceFilterOf(providerService.value));
-let providerRequestSeq = 0;
-
-/** Everyone who can actually be given a door: an app account, and active. */
-const providerEnrollable = computed(() =>
-  providerEnrollableRows(providerPeople.value)
-);
-
-/* Whether the endpoint told us who holds an app account. It only began
-   returning `user` in core 3.130, and this layer can be deployed ahead of it. */
-const providerAccountsVisible = computed(() =>
-  providerAccountsKnown(providerPeople.value)
-);
-
-/** People the operator can see on the Members screen but cannot enrol here. */
-const hiddenProviderCount = computed(
-  () => providerPeople.value.length - providerEnrollable.value.length
-);
-
-const providerServiceOptions = computed(() => [
-  { title: "All services", value: HID_ALL_SERVICES },
-  // From the ENROLLABLE set, so choosing a service never lands on an empty list.
-  ...serviceTypeOptions(providerEnrollable.value as Array<{ type?: string; typeLabel?: string }>),
-]);
-
-/** The filtered list - what both the picker and the bulk table draw. */
-const providerRows = computed(() =>
-  filterProviderMembers(providerEnrollable.value as Array<Record<string, any>>, {
-    type: providerServiceFilter.value,
-  })
-);
-
-const providerOptions = computed(() =>
-  providerRows.value.map((row) => {
-    const candidate = providerCandidateOf(row);
-    return {
-      // The firm in the title as well as the mirror: two contractors sharing a
-      // first name is the normal case, and the popover is where they have to be
-      // told apart.
-      title: candidate.subtitle
-        ? `${candidate.name} — ${candidate.subtitle}`
-        : candidate.name,
-      value: candidate.subjectId,
-    };
-  })
-);
-
-const providerPlaceholder = computed(() => {
-  if (loadingProviders.value) return "Loading people...";
-  if (!providersLoaded.value) return "Select a person";
-  if (providerOptions.value.length) return "Select a person";
-  if (providerServiceFilter.value) return "Nobody in this service can be enrolled yet";
-  if (hiddenProviderCount.value) return "Nobody here can be enrolled yet";
-  return providerCompanyCount.value
-    ? "No service provider people at this site"
-    : "No service providers work at this site yet";
-});
-
-/* Say why somebody on the Members screen is not in this list, rather than
-   letting a missing colleague read as a broken dialog. */
-const hiddenProviderNote = computed(() => {
-  if (loadingProviders.value || !hiddenProviderCount.value) return "";
-  const count = hiddenProviderCount.value;
-  const subject = count === 1 ? "1 person" : `${count} people`;
-  const verb = count === 1 ? "is" : "are";
-  const holder = count === 1 ? "that person is" : "they are";
-  const needs = providerAccountsVisible.value
-    ? "an active membership with an app account"
-    : "an active membership at this site";
-  return `${subject} from this site's service providers ${verb} not listed:`
-    + ` HID enrollment needs ${needs}, and ${holder} without one.`;
-});
-
-/** Back to "nothing loaded", so the next open starts clean. */
-function resetProviderCandidates() {
-  providerRequestSeq += 1;
-  providerPeople.value = [];
-  providerCompanyCount.value = 0;
-  providerService.value = HID_ALL_SERVICES;
-  providersLoaded.value = false;
-}
-
-/**
- * This site's service provider people.
- *
- * NEVER THROWS, on the same rule as the staff loader: choosing Service provider
- * must not break the dialog. The placeholder carries the failure.
- */
-async function loadProviderCandidates() {
-  if (!props.site) {
-    resetProviderCandidates();
-    providersLoaded.value = true;
-    return;
-  }
-  const seq = (providerRequestSeq += 1);
-  loadingProviders.value = true;
-  try {
-    const data = await getSiteMembers(props.site);
-    // A response that arrived after the dialog was reopened belongs to a list
-    // that no longer exists - the same guard the staff pager uses.
-    if (seq !== providerRequestSeq) return;
-    providerPeople.value = Array.isArray(data?.items)
-      ? (data.items as unknown as Record<string, unknown>[])
-      : [];
-    providerCompanyCount.value = Array.isArray(data?.companies)
-      ? data.companies.length
-      : 0;
-    providersLoaded.value = true;
-  } catch (error: unknown) {
-    if (seq !== providerRequestSeq) return;
-    console.error("Unable to load service provider people for HID enrollment:", error);
-    providerPeople.value = [];
-    providerCompanyCount.value = 0;
-    providersLoaded.value = true;
-  } finally {
-    loadingProviders.value = false;
-  }
-}
-
-/** The chosen person, restated into Name and the Company mirror. */
-function onProviderChanged() {
-  // Compared on the TRIMMED id, because that is what the option's value carries
-  // (`providerCandidateOf` trims) - matching the raw field would silently find
-  // nobody and blank the name the operator just picked.
-  const row = providerRows.value.find(
-    (item) => String(item._id ?? "").trim() === form.subjectId
-  );
-  const candidate = row ? providerCandidateOf(row) : null;
-  form.name = candidate?.name ?? "";
-  form.subjectRole = candidate?.subtitle ?? "";
-  void checkSubjectEnrollment();
-}
-
-/* Changing the service can take the chosen person out of the list. Leaving a
-   selection that is no longer on screen is how a save ends up naming somebody
-   the operator cannot see. */
-function onProviderServiceChanged() {
-  if (!form.subjectId) return;
-  const stillThere = providerRows.value.some(
-    (item) => String(item._id ?? "").trim() === form.subjectId
-  );
-  if (stillThere) return;
-  form.subjectId = "";
-  form.name = "";
-  form.subjectRole = "";
-  residentConflict.value = null;
-}
-
-/* ── ADD USERS IN BULK ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
- *
- * ACCESS, NOT CREDENTIALS. This grants a reader group to many people at once and
- * stops there - no face, no card, no PIN. Each person then adds their own
- * credential from their app, which attaches to the HID user this grant created
- * (`getProfileEnrollmentContext` reuses the existing profile identity), so
- * nobody has to be enrolled twice.
- *
- * It writes through `PUT /sites/:siteId/permissions`, the one call that writes
- * group membership, and the device users are created by the reconcile that call
- * triggers: `provisionPermissionUser` writes `{ name, registration }` and
- * nothing else. That is exactly "user record and group, credentials empty".
- *
- * THE TRAP, and the reason the saved set is fetched first: that PUT REPLACES
- * this reader's whole assignment set. Sending only the ticked contractors would
- * revoke every resident and every member on the door. The payload is always
- * built from the reader's existing assignments PLUS the selection.
- */
-const bulkDialog = ref(false);
-const bulkLoading = ref(false);
-const bulkSaving = ref(false);
-const bulkSearch = ref("");
-/** The reader's CURRENT assignments, across every category. The merge base. */
-const bulkSaved = ref<HidAssignmentState>(new Map());
-/** Who is being added now. Already-granted people are never in here. */
-const bulkSelected = ref<Set<string>>(new Set());
-
-/* NAME THE DOOR. A bulk grant is reader-scoped and the reader was chosen on the
-   screen behind two dialogs, so the confirmation says which one rather than
-   leaving the operator to remember. */
-const bulkReaderLabel = computed(() => {
-  const reader = selectedReader.value;
-  const name = String(reader?.name ?? "").trim() || "this HID reader";
-  const location = String(reader?.location ?? "").trim();
-  return location ? `${name} · ${location}` : name;
-});
-
-/** The same people the picker offers, narrowed by this dialog's own search. */
-const bulkRows = computed(() => {
-  const rows = filterProviderMembers(
-    providerRows.value as Array<Record<string, any>>,
-    { search: bulkSearch.value }
-  );
-  return rows.map((row) => {
-    const candidate = providerCandidateOf(row);
-    const id = candidate.subjectId;
-    return {
-      subjectId: id,
-      name: candidate.name,
-      company: String(row.company ?? "").trim(),
-      service: String(row.typeLabel ?? row.type ?? "").trim(),
-      // Already on the door. Ticked and locked rather than hidden: hiding them
-      // would make "select all" look like it had missed people, and unticking
-      // one here would revoke access this dialog is not for revoking.
-      granted: bulkSaved.value.has(id),
-    };
-  });
-});
-
-const bulkSelectableRows = computed(() =>
-  bulkRows.value.filter((row) => !row.granted)
-);
-const bulkSelectedCount = computed(() => bulkSelected.value.size);
-const bulkAllSelected = computed(
-  () =>
-    bulkSelectableRows.value.length > 0 &&
-    bulkSelectableRows.value.every((row) => bulkSelected.value.has(row.subjectId))
-);
-const bulkGrantedCount = computed(
-  () => bulkRows.value.filter((row) => row.granted).length
-);
-
-const bulkEmptyText = computed(() => {
-  if (bulkLoading.value) return "Loading...";
-  if (bulkSearch.value.trim()) return "No one matches this search.";
-  if (providerServiceFilter.value) return "No one in this service can be enrolled yet.";
-  return "No service provider people can be enrolled at this site yet.";
-});
-
-function isBulkSelected(subjectId: string) {
-  return bulkSelected.value.has(subjectId);
-}
-
-function toggleBulkRow(subjectId: string, selected: boolean) {
-  const next = new Set(bulkSelected.value);
-  if (selected) next.add(subjectId);
-  else next.delete(subjectId);
-  bulkSelected.value = next;
-}
-
-/* Select-all acts on the ROWS IN FRONT OF THE OPERATOR - what the service filter
-   and the search have left - never on the whole estate. A tick box cannot
-   quietly grant a door to people who are not on screen. */
-function toggleBulkAll(selected: boolean) {
-  const next = new Set(bulkSelected.value);
-  for (const row of bulkSelectableRows.value) {
-    if (selected) next.add(row.subjectId);
-    else next.delete(row.subjectId);
-  }
-  bulkSelected.value = next;
-}
-
-/**
- * Open the bulk dialog, after reading what the reader already holds.
- *
- * The saved set is fetched EVERY time rather than cached: it is the merge base
- * for a write that replaces the reader's assignments, and a stale one would
- * revoke whoever was granted in between.
- */
-async function openBulkAdd() {
-  const readerId =
-    selectedReaderId.value || form.reader || readers.value[0]?._id;
-  if (!readerId) {
-    showToast("Select a HID reader before adding people in bulk.", "error");
-    return;
-  }
-  /* The permissions endpoints REQUIRE an org - `schemaHidPermissionScopeQuery`
-     has it as `required()`, unlike `createIdentity`, which falls back to the
-     site's own. Both pages that mount this component pass one, so this is a
-     guard against a 400 that would read as a server fault. */
-  if (!props.org) {
-    showToast(
-      "This screen cannot grant access in bulk without an organization.",
-      "error"
-    );
-    return;
-  }
-  bulkSearch.value = "";
-  bulkSelected.value = new Set();
-  bulkSaved.value = new Map();
-  bulkDialog.value = true;
-  bulkLoading.value = true;
-  try {
-    if (!providersLoaded.value) await loadProviderCandidates();
-    const response = await getSitePermissions(props.site, props.org, readerId);
-    bulkSaved.value = seedAssignments(response?.data?.assignments ?? []);
-  } catch (error: unknown) {
-    // Closed rather than left open on an empty merge base: saving from here
-    // would send only the ticked people and revoke everybody else.
-    bulkDialog.value = false;
-    showToast(
-      apiReason(error) || "Unable to read this reader's current access.",
-      "error"
-    );
-  } finally {
-    bulkLoading.value = false;
-  }
-}
-
-/** Grant the ticked people, keeping everyone the reader already admits. */
-async function saveBulkAdd() {
-  if (bulkSaving.value || !bulkSelected.value.size) return;
-  const readerId =
-    selectedReaderId.value || form.reader || readers.value[0]?._id;
-  if (!readerId) {
-    showToast("Select a HID reader before adding people in bulk.", "error");
-    return;
-  }
-
-  bulkSaving.value = true;
-  try {
-    // Seeded from what the server holds, so every category the reader already
-    // admits survives this write.
-    let draft: HidAssignmentState = new Map(bulkSaved.value);
-    for (const subjectId of bulkSelected.value) {
-      draft = setAssignment(
-        draft,
-        bulkSaved.value,
-        subjectId,
-        // A provider employee's grant is stored under the STAFF category: core's
-        // `permissionSubjectOfIdentity` reads the `member` link and cannot see
-        // this dropdown, and that category's subject list already includes these
-        // people. See `permissionCategoryOf`.
-        permissionCategoryOf("service_provider_staff") as THidPermissionCategory,
-        true
-      );
-    }
-    const added = bulkSelected.value.size;
-    await updateSitePermissions(
-      props.site,
-      props.org,
-      readerId,
-      toAssignmentPayload(draft)
-    );
-    // Both dialogs close and the list is re-read: the reconcile has just created
-    // a HID user for each person, so the roster behind this dialog is stale.
-    bulkDialog.value = false;
-    formDialog.value = false;
-    await loadUsers();
-    showToast(
-      `${added} ${added === 1 ? "person" : "people"} can now use this reader. `
-        + "They add their own face, QR or PIN from their app.",
-      "success"
-    );
-  } catch (error: unknown) {
-    showToast(
-      apiReason(error) || "Unable to give these people access to this reader.",
-      "error"
-    );
-  } finally {
-    bulkSaving.value = false;
-  }
-}
-
 /**
  * Switching type clears the chosen subject, and nothing else.
  *
@@ -1975,20 +1372,15 @@ async function saveBulkAdd() {
  * choice, so they clear with it.
  */
 async function onSubjectCategoryChanged() {
-  REMEMBERED_SUBJECT_CATEGORY.value = form.subjectCategory as HidEnrolmentSubject;
+  REMEMBERED_SUBJECT_CATEGORY.value = form.subjectCategory;
   form.subjectId = "";
   form.subjectRole = "";
   form.name = "";
   residentConflict.value = null;
 
-  // Each list is fetched on first use and then kept, so flipping between the
-  // three options costs one request each rather than one per flip.
-  if (isMemberSubject.value && !membersLoaded.value) {
+  if (!isResidentSubject.value && !membersLoaded.value) {
     await loadMemberCandidates();
   }
-  if (isProviderSubject.value && !providersLoaded.value) {
-    await loadProviderCandidates();
-  }
 }
 
 /* The staff equivalent of `onResidentChanged`. */
@@ -2547,9 +1939,7 @@ async function openEnroll() {
   // the request must not delay it, and the picker carries its own loading
   // placeholder. Fresh each opening, because staff change between them.
   resetMemberCandidates();
-  resetProviderCandidates();
-  if (isMemberSubject.value) await loadMemberCandidates();
-  if (isProviderSubject.value) await loadProviderCandidates();
+  if (!isResidentSubject.value) await loadMemberCandidates();
 }
 
 async function openEdit(user: HidUser) {
@@ -2571,21 +1961,14 @@ async function openEdit(user: HidUser) {
   removePinRequested.value = false;
   form.photoPreview = "";
   facialEnrolled.value = hasFacialEnrollment(user);
-  /*
-   * ONE reading of the links, shared with the Access Permissions screen.
-   * `subjectOfIdentity` knows that a `member` link is how BOTH a
-   * property-management member and a service provider's own employee are stored,
-   * and uses the identity's `type` to tell them apart - without which a
-   * contractor's edit would be headed "Member".
-   *
-   * This was the same ternary written out inline. The other copy of it went
-   * stale, so neither is written out any more.
-   */
-  const editedSubject = subjectOfIdentity(user as Record<string, unknown>);
-  form.subjectCategory = enrolmentSubjectOfCategory(
-    editedSubject?.category
-  ) as TEnrolmentSubjectValue;
-  form.subjectId = editedSubject?.subjectId ?? "";
+  form.subjectCategory = user.person
+    ? "resident"
+    : user.serviceProvider
+    ? "service_provider"
+    : "property_management";
+  form.subjectId = String(
+    user.person || user.member || user.serviceProvider || ""
+  );
   // The resident this user already holds is not a conflict with itself. A real
   // one only appears if the operator reassigns the row to somebody else.
   residentConflict.value = null;
@@ -2698,8 +2081,6 @@ async function saveUser() {
     : !selectedUser.value && !form.subjectId
     ? isResidentSubject.value
       ? "a resident"
-      : isProviderSubject.value
-      ? "a person"
       : "a member"
     : !form.name
     ? "a name"
@@ -2758,7 +2139,27 @@ async function saveUser() {
     // an empty string as a link being removed and then refuses the write for
     // having no subject at all. Omitting the keys is what makes it keep the
     // subject the record already has.
-    const subjectLink = subjectLinkOf(form.subjectCategory, form.subjectId);
+    const subjectLink = form.subjectId
+      ? {
+          person: form.subjectCategory === "resident" ? form.subjectId : "",
+          member:
+            form.subjectCategory === "property_management"
+              ? form.subjectId
+              : "",
+          serviceProvider:
+            form.subjectCategory === "service_provider" ? form.subjectId : "",
+          type: (form.subjectCategory === "resident"
+            ? "resident"
+            : form.subjectCategory === "service_provider"
+            ? "contractor"
+            : "staff") as
+            | "resident"
+            | "staff"
+            | "contractor"
+            | "visitor"
+            | "unknown",
+        }
+      : {};
 
     const payload = {
       hidUserId: String(hidUser.id),
@@ -3882,47 +3283,6 @@ watch(selectedReaderId, (value) => {
   color: var(--err);
 }
 
-/* The bulk button and the sentence that says what it does. Stacked rather than
-   side by side: the sentence is the part that stops somebody expecting this to
-   enrol faces, so it must not be squeezed into a margin at narrow widths. */
-.hid-bulk-cta {
-  display: flex;
-  flex-direction: column;
-  align-items: flex-start;
-  gap: 4px;
-}
-
-.hid-bulk-cta .field-hint {
-  margin: 0;
-}
-
-/* Checkbox column only as wide as the control, so the three columns that carry
-   meaning keep the width. */
-.hid-bulk-table__check {
-  width: 44px;
-  padding-right: 0 !important;
-}
-
-.hid-bulk-table :deep(th) {
-  font-size: 12px;
-  font-weight: 700;
-  color: var(--muted);
-  white-space: nowrap;
-}
-
-.hid-bulk-table :deep(td) {
-  font-size: 13px;
-}
-
-/* Why this row cannot be unticked, on the row itself. A disabled checkbox with
-   no reason beside it reads as a broken control. */
-.hid-bulk-granted {
-  display: block;
-  color: var(--muted);
-  font-size: 11px;
-  font-weight: 600;
-}
-
 .photo-wrap {
   display: grid;
   place-items: center;