@333eco/corpus 2.3.3 → 2.3.5

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (3) hide show
  1. package/README.md +6 -0
  2. package/dist/corpus.json +298 -152
  3. package/package.json +1 -1
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ So the check moves into the response:
33
33
  "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.22217516",
34
34
  "opentimestamps": true,
35
35
  "deposited_matches_current": true,
36
+ "hostile_review": null,
36
37
  "verify": {
37
38
  "sha256": "printf '%s' \"$(cat <file>)\" | shasum -a 256 # compare to provenance.sha256",
38
39
  "doi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22217516",
@@ -44,6 +45,11 @@ So the check moves into the response:
44
45
  The `verify` block is an instruction, not a promise — it tells you exactly what
45
46
  to run, so you do not have to trust this sentence either.
46
47
 
48
+ `hostile_review` is the date of the latest ruled review by an outside reader chosen as
49
+ the one most likely to find the document wrong, whose section structure still matches
50
+ the text served — or `null`, stated rather than omitted. It is derived from the corpus's
51
+ public `reviews.json` (roles only, never names), and a structural revision resets it.
52
+
47
53
  ⭐ **The demonstration is the contribution.** Anyone can propose provenance-carrying
48
54
  retrieval. Serving it over a corpus where the anchors are already years deep in
49
55
  the Bitcoin blockchain is a different claim, and it is not one that can be