@1delta/margin-fetcher 5.0.61 → 5.0.63

package/dist/index.d.ts

@@ -7648,8 +7648,14 @@ interface LiquidationTerms {
      *  - `default-seizure` The whole escrow is forfeit on a missed payment
      *                     (Teller).
      *  - `delivery`       Unpaid collateral is delivered to lenders (TermMax).
-     */
-    model?: Open<'repay-seize' | 'soft-band' | 'stability-pool' | 'auction' | 'default-seizure' | 'delivery' | 'none'>;
+     *  - `repay-to-target-hf`
+     *                     There is no close factor at all: the liquidator repays
+     *                     however much it takes to restore the position to
+     *                     {@link targetHealthFactor}, and the bonus SCALES with
+     *                     how far under water it is (Aave V4). See
+     *                     {@link healthFactorForMaxBonus}.
+     */
+    model?: Open<'repay-seize' | 'soft-band' | 'stability-pool' | 'auction' | 'default-seizure' | 'delivery' | 'repay-to-target-hf' | 'none'>;
     /** Who ends up holding the seized collateral. */
     absorber?: Open<'liquidator' | 'stability-pool' | 'other-borrowers' | 'lenders' | 'amm'>;
     /**
@@ -7712,6 +7718,17 @@ interface LiquidationTerms {
      * this. Without it, `closeFactor: 0.5` understates the worst case.
      */
     fullCloseBelowHealthFactor?: number;
+    /**
+     * `repay-to-target-hf` only: the health factor at or below which the
+     * liquidator's bonus reaches its maximum — i.e. the value {@link penalty}
+     * actually describes.
+     *
+     * Load-bearing next to a scaling bonus, because the two fields say different
+     * things: Aave V4's bonus grows from ~0 at HF 1 to `maxLiquidationBonus`
+     * here, so publishing the max alone reads as a flat penalty every liquidation
+     * charges, and publishing nothing reads as a market with no penalty at all.
+     */
+    healthFactorForMaxBonus?: number;
     trigger: Open<'price' | 'time' | 'price-and-time' | 'redemption' | 'none'>;
     /** Max LTV at open. */
     ltv?: number;