@1claw/openapi-spec 0.61.47 → 0.61.49

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (3) hide show
  1. package/openapi.json +492 -2
  2. package/openapi.yaml +364 -2
  3. package/package.json +2 -2
package/openapi.json CHANGED
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
  "openapi": "3.1.0",
3
3
  "info": {
4
4
  "title": "1Claw API",
5
- "version": "0.61.47",
5
+ "version": "0.61.49",
6
6
  "description": "Secure secret management for AI agents. Provides vaults, secrets,\npolicy-based access control, agent identity, Intents API,\nsharing, billing, and audit logging. Automations (workflow_spec,\nwebhook tokens, event triggers, Assist), cloud runtimes with\ninteractive shell sessions, agent memory, and discovery.\n\n## Domains\n\n`api.1claw.co` is canonical: it is the OIDC issuer, the `aud` the API\nmints, and the first entry in `servers` — a generated client takes its\nbase URL from there, and the previous ordering pointed every SDK at the\ndomain the issuer had already left. `api.1claw.xyz` still answers and is\nstill accepted on token validation, because tokens minted before the\nmove carry it; it is never minted now.\n\nOne deliberate exception: the Shroud attestation identity token is\nrequested from GCP with `audience: https://api.1claw.xyz`, so\n`/v1/shroud/attestation` reports that as its `expected_audience`. That\nis accurate rather than stale — the audience is a verification contract\nwith anyone already checking the token, and moving it is a breaking\nchange for them, not a rename.\n\nAll endpoints require JWT Bearer authentication unless marked with\n`security: []`.\n",
7
7
  "contact": {
8
8
  "email": "ops@1claw.co"
@@ -7760,6 +7760,194 @@
7760
7760
  }
7761
7761
  }
7762
7762
  },
7763
+ "/v1/staking/points": {
7764
+ "get": {
7765
+ "tags": [
7766
+ "Billing"
7767
+ ],
7768
+ "summary": "Staking points for the signed-in user's wallet",
7769
+ "description": "Points earned by staking, what has been redeemed here, and what is\nleft.\n\nThe two halves come from different places on purpose. `earned` is\nread per request from the staking service, which recomputes it from\non-chain events; `spent` is this service's own append-only ledger.\n`available` is the difference, floored at zero.\n\nThe wallet is the one on the account, proven by a SIWE signature at\nsign-in — there is no way to ask about another address.\n\n`can_redeem` is false until the account has a real, verified email:\na wallet signature proves possession of a key, not a reachable\nperson, and `redeem_blocked_reason` says what to do about it.\n",
7770
+ "operationId": "getStakingPoints",
7771
+ "responses": {
7772
+ "200": {
7773
+ "description": "Points and rates",
7774
+ "content": {
7775
+ "application/json": {
7776
+ "schema": {
7777
+ "type": "object",
7778
+ "properties": {
7779
+ "wallet_address": {
7780
+ "type": "string"
7781
+ },
7782
+ "earned": {
7783
+ "type": "integer",
7784
+ "format": "int64"
7785
+ },
7786
+ "spent": {
7787
+ "type": "integer",
7788
+ "format": "int64"
7789
+ },
7790
+ "available": {
7791
+ "type": "integer",
7792
+ "format": "int64"
7793
+ },
7794
+ "can_redeem": {
7795
+ "type": "boolean"
7796
+ },
7797
+ "redeem_blocked_reason": {
7798
+ "type": "string",
7799
+ "nullable": true
7800
+ },
7801
+ "rates": {
7802
+ "type": "object",
7803
+ "properties": {
7804
+ "points_per_pro_month": {
7805
+ "type": "integer"
7806
+ },
7807
+ "micro_usd_per_point": {
7808
+ "type": "integer"
7809
+ },
7810
+ "points_per_day_per_100m_tokens": {
7811
+ "type": "integer"
7812
+ },
7813
+ "max_pro_months_per_redemption": {
7814
+ "type": "integer"
7815
+ }
7816
+ }
7817
+ },
7818
+ "recent": {
7819
+ "type": "array",
7820
+ "items": {
7821
+ "type": "object",
7822
+ "properties": {
7823
+ "id": {
7824
+ "type": "string",
7825
+ "format": "uuid"
7826
+ },
7827
+ "wallet_address": {
7828
+ "type": "string"
7829
+ },
7830
+ "points_spent": {
7831
+ "type": "integer",
7832
+ "format": "int64"
7833
+ },
7834
+ "reward_type": {
7835
+ "type": "string",
7836
+ "enum": [
7837
+ "pro_months",
7838
+ "credits"
7839
+ ]
7840
+ },
7841
+ "reward_detail": {
7842
+ "type": "object"
7843
+ },
7844
+ "created_at": {
7845
+ "type": "string",
7846
+ "format": "date-time"
7847
+ }
7848
+ }
7849
+ }
7850
+ }
7851
+ }
7852
+ }
7853
+ }
7854
+ }
7855
+ },
7856
+ "400": {
7857
+ "description": "No wallet linked to this account"
7858
+ },
7859
+ "403": {
7860
+ "description": "Only a signed-in person can read staking points"
7861
+ },
7862
+ "503": {
7863
+ "description": "The staking service could not report points. Deliberately not\nreported as zero — that would tell a staker their earnings\nhad vanished.\n"
7864
+ }
7865
+ }
7866
+ }
7867
+ },
7868
+ "/v1/staking/redeem": {
7869
+ "post": {
7870
+ "tags": [
7871
+ "Billing"
7872
+ ],
7873
+ "summary": "Redeem staking points for plan time or credits",
7874
+ "description": "Spends points from the wallet on the account.\n\n`quantity` is **months** for `pro_months` and **points** for\n`credits`; the response always states the cost actually charged.\n\nPro months extend an existing period rather than replacing it, so\nredeeming twice does not discard the time already granted. They are\nrefused when the organisation has a Stripe subscription, or is on a\ntier above Pro: a comped tier would overwrite the plan being paid\nfor and would never expire. Credits apply on top of a subscription\nand are the right choice there.\n\nRedemption serialises on the wallet's ledger, so two concurrent\nrequests cannot spend the same points.\n",
7875
+ "operationId": "redeemStakingPoints",
7876
+ "requestBody": {
7877
+ "required": true,
7878
+ "content": {
7879
+ "application/json": {
7880
+ "schema": {
7881
+ "type": "object",
7882
+ "required": [
7883
+ "reward_type",
7884
+ "quantity"
7885
+ ],
7886
+ "properties": {
7887
+ "reward_type": {
7888
+ "type": "string",
7889
+ "enum": [
7890
+ "pro_months",
7891
+ "credits"
7892
+ ]
7893
+ },
7894
+ "quantity": {
7895
+ "type": "integer",
7896
+ "format": "int64",
7897
+ "minimum": 1,
7898
+ "description": "Months for pro_months; points for credits"
7899
+ }
7900
+ }
7901
+ }
7902
+ }
7903
+ }
7904
+ },
7905
+ "responses": {
7906
+ "200": {
7907
+ "description": "Redeemed",
7908
+ "content": {
7909
+ "application/json": {
7910
+ "schema": {
7911
+ "type": "object",
7912
+ "properties": {
7913
+ "redemption_id": {
7914
+ "type": "string",
7915
+ "format": "uuid"
7916
+ },
7917
+ "points_spent": {
7918
+ "type": "integer",
7919
+ "format": "int64"
7920
+ },
7921
+ "remaining_available": {
7922
+ "type": "integer",
7923
+ "format": "int64"
7924
+ },
7925
+ "reward_type": {
7926
+ "type": "string"
7927
+ },
7928
+ "reward_detail": {
7929
+ "type": "object"
7930
+ }
7931
+ }
7932
+ }
7933
+ }
7934
+ }
7935
+ },
7936
+ "400": {
7937
+ "description": "Not enough points, or no wallet linked"
7938
+ },
7939
+ "403": {
7940
+ "description": "A real verified email is required before redeeming"
7941
+ },
7942
+ "409": {
7943
+ "description": "Pro months refused because the organisation's billing is owned\nby Stripe, or its tier is above Pro. Redeem credits instead.\n"
7944
+ },
7945
+ "503": {
7946
+ "description": "The staking service could not report points; nothing was charged"
7947
+ }
7948
+ }
7949
+ }
7950
+ },
7763
7951
  "/v1/billing/credits/topup": {
7764
7952
  "post": {
7765
7953
  "tags": [
@@ -11372,6 +11560,146 @@
11372
11560
  }
11373
11561
  }
11374
11562
  },
11563
+ "/v1/treasury/wallets/{chain}/sign-message": {
11564
+ "post": {
11565
+ "tags": [
11566
+ "Treasury"
11567
+ ],
11568
+ "summary": "Sign a message with a human wallet (EIP-191)",
11569
+ "description": "`personal_sign` over the given text, hashed as `\\x19Ethereum Signed Message:\\n<len>` + message — what viem's `verifyMessage` and ethers' `verifyMessage` expect.\n\nHuman callers only; an agent signs with its own key via `POST /v1/agents/{agent_id}/sign`. Gated exactly as a send is: `X-Auth-Confirm` step-up scored as a Send action, wallet access policies (`WalletAction::Sign`), and a refusal for wallets whose key is split or passkey-owned — those have no server-side key and will not fall back to one.\n\nEVM chains only.\n",
11570
+ "operationId": "signTreasuryMessage",
11571
+ "parameters": [
11572
+ {
11573
+ "name": "chain",
11574
+ "in": "path",
11575
+ "required": true,
11576
+ "schema": {
11577
+ "type": "string",
11578
+ "example": "ethereum"
11579
+ }
11580
+ },
11581
+ {
11582
+ "name": "X-Auth-Confirm",
11583
+ "in": "header",
11584
+ "required": true,
11585
+ "schema": {
11586
+ "type": "string"
11587
+ },
11588
+ "description": "Account password, or a `rat_` token from `POST /v1/auth/reauth/complete`."
11589
+ }
11590
+ ],
11591
+ "requestBody": {
11592
+ "required": true,
11593
+ "content": {
11594
+ "application/json": {
11595
+ "schema": {
11596
+ "type": "object",
11597
+ "required": [
11598
+ "message"
11599
+ ],
11600
+ "properties": {
11601
+ "message": {
11602
+ "type": "string",
11603
+ "maxLength": 16384,
11604
+ "example": "Sign in to Example at 2026-10-01T10:00:00Z"
11605
+ }
11606
+ }
11607
+ }
11608
+ }
11609
+ }
11610
+ },
11611
+ "responses": {
11612
+ "200": {
11613
+ "description": "Signature",
11614
+ "content": {
11615
+ "application/json": {
11616
+ "schema": {
11617
+ "$ref": "#/components/schemas/WalletSignature"
11618
+ }
11619
+ }
11620
+ }
11621
+ },
11622
+ "400": {
11623
+ "description": "Empty or oversized message, or a non-EVM chain"
11624
+ },
11625
+ "403": {
11626
+ "description": "Agent caller, missing or insufficient step-up, denied by a wallet access policy, or a self-custody wallet the server cannot sign for.\n"
11627
+ },
11628
+ "404": {
11629
+ "description": "No wallet on that chain for this user"
11630
+ }
11631
+ }
11632
+ }
11633
+ },
11634
+ "/v1/treasury/wallets/{chain}/sign-typed-data": {
11635
+ "post": {
11636
+ "tags": [
11637
+ "Treasury"
11638
+ ],
11639
+ "summary": "Sign EIP-712 typed data with a human wallet",
11640
+ "description": "Hashes and signs a full EIP-712 payload. Include `EIP712Domain` in `types` — viem and ethers synthesise that entry and omit it, and this hashes exactly what you send.\n\nSame gates as `sign-message`.\n",
11641
+ "operationId": "signTreasuryTypedData",
11642
+ "parameters": [
11643
+ {
11644
+ "name": "chain",
11645
+ "in": "path",
11646
+ "required": true,
11647
+ "schema": {
11648
+ "type": "string",
11649
+ "example": "base"
11650
+ }
11651
+ },
11652
+ {
11653
+ "name": "X-Auth-Confirm",
11654
+ "in": "header",
11655
+ "required": true,
11656
+ "schema": {
11657
+ "type": "string"
11658
+ }
11659
+ }
11660
+ ],
11661
+ "requestBody": {
11662
+ "required": true,
11663
+ "content": {
11664
+ "application/json": {
11665
+ "schema": {
11666
+ "type": "object",
11667
+ "required": [
11668
+ "typed_data"
11669
+ ],
11670
+ "properties": {
11671
+ "typed_data": {
11672
+ "type": "object",
11673
+ "description": "`types`, `primaryType`, `domain`, `message`."
11674
+ }
11675
+ }
11676
+ }
11677
+ }
11678
+ }
11679
+ },
11680
+ "responses": {
11681
+ "200": {
11682
+ "description": "Signature",
11683
+ "content": {
11684
+ "application/json": {
11685
+ "schema": {
11686
+ "$ref": "#/components/schemas/WalletSignature"
11687
+ }
11688
+ }
11689
+ }
11690
+ },
11691
+ "400": {
11692
+ "description": "Malformed EIP-712 payload, or a non-EVM chain"
11693
+ },
11694
+ "403": {
11695
+ "description": "Same refusals as sign-message"
11696
+ },
11697
+ "404": {
11698
+ "description": "No wallet on that chain for this user"
11699
+ }
11700
+ }
11701
+ }
11702
+ },
11375
11703
  "/v1/treasury/wallets/{chain}/swap": {
11376
11704
  "post": {
11377
11705
  "tags": [
@@ -17534,6 +17862,143 @@
17534
17862
  }
17535
17863
  }
17536
17864
  },
17865
+ "/v1/auth/siwe/challenge": {
17866
+ "post": {
17867
+ "tags": [
17868
+ "Authentication"
17869
+ ],
17870
+ "summary": "Start wallet sign-in (SIWE)",
17871
+ "description": "Returns the exact EIP-4361 message to sign, for signing in to the\ndashboard with an Ethereum wallet.\n\nThe message is built server-side and returned whole: the domain and\nthe nonce are ours to decide, and a client that assembles its own\nmessage is a client that can be talked into signing a different\none. Sign it unmodified and post it back to\n`/v1/auth/siwe/verify`.\n\nThe nonce is single-use and valid for five minutes. Distinct from\n`/v1/platform/siwe/challenge`, which needs a `plt_` caller and\nissues nonces scoped to one platform app for *its* end users.\n",
17872
+ "operationId": "siweLoginChallenge",
17873
+ "security": [],
17874
+ "requestBody": {
17875
+ "required": true,
17876
+ "content": {
17877
+ "application/json": {
17878
+ "schema": {
17879
+ "type": "object",
17880
+ "required": [
17881
+ "address"
17882
+ ],
17883
+ "properties": {
17884
+ "address": {
17885
+ "type": "string",
17886
+ "description": "0x-prefixed 20-byte Ethereum address",
17887
+ "example": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000001"
17888
+ }
17889
+ }
17890
+ }
17891
+ }
17892
+ }
17893
+ },
17894
+ "responses": {
17895
+ "200": {
17896
+ "description": "Message to sign",
17897
+ "content": {
17898
+ "application/json": {
17899
+ "schema": {
17900
+ "type": "object",
17901
+ "properties": {
17902
+ "message": {
17903
+ "type": "string",
17904
+ "description": "Sign this verbatim"
17905
+ },
17906
+ "nonce": {
17907
+ "type": "string"
17908
+ },
17909
+ "expires_in_secs": {
17910
+ "type": "integer"
17911
+ }
17912
+ }
17913
+ }
17914
+ }
17915
+ }
17916
+ },
17917
+ "400": {
17918
+ "description": "Not a valid Ethereum address"
17919
+ },
17920
+ "429": {
17921
+ "description": "Rate limited"
17922
+ }
17923
+ }
17924
+ }
17925
+ },
17926
+ "/v1/auth/siwe/verify": {
17927
+ "post": {
17928
+ "tags": [
17929
+ "Authentication"
17930
+ ],
17931
+ "summary": "Complete wallet sign-in and get a JWT",
17932
+ "description": "Verifies the signature over the challenge message and returns an\nordinary user JWT — the same token social login and email-OTP\nproduce.\n\nFirst sign-in for an address creates a user and org. That user's\nemail starts synthetic (`email_pending: true`) and unverified: a\nwallet signature proves possession of a key, not a reachable\nperson. Staking redemption refuses until a real address is added\nand confirmed.\n\nThe wallet recovered from the signature is stored on the account\nand is the identity staking points are counted against. It is\nnever accepted from a request body anywhere.\n",
17933
+ "operationId": "siweLoginVerify",
17934
+ "security": [],
17935
+ "requestBody": {
17936
+ "required": true,
17937
+ "content": {
17938
+ "application/json": {
17939
+ "schema": {
17940
+ "type": "object",
17941
+ "required": [
17942
+ "message",
17943
+ "signature"
17944
+ ],
17945
+ "properties": {
17946
+ "message": {
17947
+ "type": "string",
17948
+ "description": "The challenge message, unmodified"
17949
+ },
17950
+ "signature": {
17951
+ "type": "string",
17952
+ "description": "Hex signature over the message"
17953
+ }
17954
+ }
17955
+ }
17956
+ }
17957
+ }
17958
+ },
17959
+ "responses": {
17960
+ "200": {
17961
+ "description": "Authenticated",
17962
+ "content": {
17963
+ "application/json": {
17964
+ "schema": {
17965
+ "type": "object",
17966
+ "properties": {
17967
+ "token": {
17968
+ "type": "string"
17969
+ },
17970
+ "user_id": {
17971
+ "type": "string",
17972
+ "format": "uuid"
17973
+ },
17974
+ "org_id": {
17975
+ "type": "string",
17976
+ "format": "uuid"
17977
+ },
17978
+ "wallet_address": {
17979
+ "type": "string"
17980
+ },
17981
+ "is_new_user": {
17982
+ "type": "boolean"
17983
+ },
17984
+ "email_pending": {
17985
+ "type": "boolean",
17986
+ "description": "True while the account email is still the synthetic\nwallet address. Redemption is blocked until a real\none is verified.\n"
17987
+ }
17988
+ }
17989
+ }
17990
+ }
17991
+ }
17992
+ },
17993
+ "400": {
17994
+ "description": "Expired or reused challenge, or a message signed for another domain"
17995
+ },
17996
+ "401": {
17997
+ "description": "Signature does not match the address in the message"
17998
+ }
17999
+ }
18000
+ }
18001
+ },
17537
18002
  "/v1/oauth/authorize": {
17538
18003
  "get": {
17539
18004
  "tags": [
@@ -28565,6 +29030,10 @@
28565
29030
  "granted_read": {
28566
29031
  "type": "boolean",
28567
29032
  "description": "False when the secret was stored but the read grant could not be written — the agent will need access granted by hand.\n"
29033
+ },
29034
+ "bound_new_vault": {
29035
+ "type": "boolean",
29036
+ "description": "True when the agent had to be bound to a vault it was not bound to before. Its access is correct from now on, but a JWT carries the `vault_ids` it was minted with, so a token the agent already holds is refused until it re-mints. Answering into a vault the agent already reaches avoids this.\n"
28568
29037
  }
28569
29038
  }
28570
29039
  }
@@ -28572,7 +29041,7 @@
28572
29041
  }
28573
29042
  },
28574
29043
  "400": {
28575
- "description": "Already answered, expired, or an invalid path"
29044
+ "description": "Already answered, expired, an invalid path, or nothing is stored at that path — the location the agent is sent to has to be real.\n"
28576
29045
  },
28577
29046
  "403": {
28578
29047
  "description": "Called by an agent"
@@ -42408,6 +42877,27 @@
42408
42877
  }
42409
42878
  }
42410
42879
  },
42880
+ "WalletSignature": {
42881
+ "type": "object",
42882
+ "required": [
42883
+ "signature",
42884
+ "address",
42885
+ "chain"
42886
+ ],
42887
+ "properties": {
42888
+ "signature": {
42889
+ "type": "string",
42890
+ "description": "65-byte `0x`-prefixed signature, r‖s‖v."
42891
+ },
42892
+ "address": {
42893
+ "type": "string",
42894
+ "description": "The signing wallet, so it can be passed straight to `verifyMessage`."
42895
+ },
42896
+ "chain": {
42897
+ "type": "string"
42898
+ }
42899
+ }
42900
+ },
42411
42901
  "SecretRequest": {
42412
42902
  "type": "object",
42413
42903
  "description": "An agent's open ask, as the human sees it. Carries the request and, once fulfilled, a reference — never a value.\n",
package/openapi.yaml CHANGED
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ openapi: 3.1.0
2
2
 
3
3
  info:
4
4
  title: 1Claw API
5
- version: "0.61.47"
5
+ version: "0.61.49"
6
6
  description: |
7
7
  Secure secret management for AI agents. Provides vaults, secrets,
8
8
  policy-based access control, agent identity, Intents API,
@@ -5015,6 +5015,132 @@ paths:
5015
5015
  schema:
5016
5016
  $ref: "#/components/schemas/SubscriptionResponse"
5017
5017
 
5018
+ /v1/staking/points:
5019
+ get:
5020
+ tags: [Billing]
5021
+ summary: Staking points for the signed-in user's wallet
5022
+ description: |
5023
+ Points earned by staking, what has been redeemed here, and what is
5024
+ left.
5025
+
5026
+ The two halves come from different places on purpose. `earned` is
5027
+ read per request from the staking service, which recomputes it from
5028
+ on-chain events; `spent` is this service's own append-only ledger.
5029
+ `available` is the difference, floored at zero.
5030
+
5031
+ The wallet is the one on the account, proven by a SIWE signature at
5032
+ sign-in — there is no way to ask about another address.
5033
+
5034
+ `can_redeem` is false until the account has a real, verified email:
5035
+ a wallet signature proves possession of a key, not a reachable
5036
+ person, and `redeem_blocked_reason` says what to do about it.
5037
+ operationId: getStakingPoints
5038
+ responses:
5039
+ "200":
5040
+ description: Points and rates
5041
+ content:
5042
+ application/json:
5043
+ schema:
5044
+ type: object
5045
+ properties:
5046
+ wallet_address: { type: string }
5047
+ earned: { type: integer, format: int64 }
5048
+ spent: { type: integer, format: int64 }
5049
+ available: { type: integer, format: int64 }
5050
+ can_redeem: { type: boolean }
5051
+ redeem_blocked_reason:
5052
+ type: string
5053
+ nullable: true
5054
+ rates:
5055
+ type: object
5056
+ properties:
5057
+ points_per_pro_month: { type: integer }
5058
+ micro_usd_per_point: { type: integer }
5059
+ points_per_day_per_100m_tokens: { type: integer }
5060
+ max_pro_months_per_redemption: { type: integer }
5061
+ recent:
5062
+ type: array
5063
+ items:
5064
+ type: object
5065
+ properties:
5066
+ id: { type: string, format: uuid }
5067
+ wallet_address: { type: string }
5068
+ points_spent: { type: integer, format: int64 }
5069
+ reward_type:
5070
+ type: string
5071
+ enum: [pro_months, credits]
5072
+ reward_detail: { type: object }
5073
+ created_at: { type: string, format: date-time }
5074
+ "400":
5075
+ description: No wallet linked to this account
5076
+ "403":
5077
+ description: Only a signed-in person can read staking points
5078
+ "503":
5079
+ description: |
5080
+ The staking service could not report points. Deliberately not
5081
+ reported as zero — that would tell a staker their earnings
5082
+ had vanished.
5083
+
5084
+ /v1/staking/redeem:
5085
+ post:
5086
+ tags: [Billing]
5087
+ summary: Redeem staking points for plan time or credits
5088
+ description: |
5089
+ Spends points from the wallet on the account.
5090
+
5091
+ `quantity` is **months** for `pro_months` and **points** for
5092
+ `credits`; the response always states the cost actually charged.
5093
+
5094
+ Pro months extend an existing period rather than replacing it, so
5095
+ redeeming twice does not discard the time already granted. They are
5096
+ refused when the organisation has a Stripe subscription, or is on a
5097
+ tier above Pro: a comped tier would overwrite the plan being paid
5098
+ for and would never expire. Credits apply on top of a subscription
5099
+ and are the right choice there.
5100
+
5101
+ Redemption serialises on the wallet's ledger, so two concurrent
5102
+ requests cannot spend the same points.
5103
+ operationId: redeemStakingPoints
5104
+ requestBody:
5105
+ required: true
5106
+ content:
5107
+ application/json:
5108
+ schema:
5109
+ type: object
5110
+ required: [reward_type, quantity]
5111
+ properties:
5112
+ reward_type:
5113
+ type: string
5114
+ enum: [pro_months, credits]
5115
+ quantity:
5116
+ type: integer
5117
+ format: int64
5118
+ minimum: 1
5119
+ description: Months for pro_months; points for credits
5120
+ responses:
5121
+ "200":
5122
+ description: Redeemed
5123
+ content:
5124
+ application/json:
5125
+ schema:
5126
+ type: object
5127
+ properties:
5128
+ redemption_id: { type: string, format: uuid }
5129
+ points_spent: { type: integer, format: int64 }
5130
+ remaining_available: { type: integer, format: int64 }
5131
+ reward_type: { type: string }
5132
+ reward_detail: { type: object }
5133
+ "400":
5134
+ description: Not enough points, or no wallet linked
5135
+ "403":
5136
+ description: A real verified email is required before redeeming
5137
+ "409":
5138
+ description: |
5139
+ Pro months refused because the organisation's billing is owned
5140
+ by Stripe, or its tier is above Pro. Redeem credits instead.
5141
+ "503":
5142
+ description: The staking service could not report points; nothing was charged
5143
+
5018
5144
  /v1/billing/credits/topup:
5019
5145
  post:
5020
5146
  tags: [Billing]
@@ -7207,6 +7333,109 @@ paths:
7207
7333
  "404":
7208
7334
  $ref: "#/components/responses/NotFound"
7209
7335
 
7336
+ /v1/treasury/wallets/{chain}/sign-message:
7337
+ post:
7338
+ tags: [Treasury]
7339
+ summary: "Sign a message with a human wallet (EIP-191)"
7340
+ description: >
7341
+ `personal_sign` over the given text, hashed as
7342
+ `\x19Ethereum Signed Message:\n<len>` + message — what
7343
+ viem's `verifyMessage` and ethers' `verifyMessage` expect.
7344
+
7345
+
7346
+ Human callers only; an agent signs with its own key via
7347
+ `POST /v1/agents/{agent_id}/sign`. Gated exactly as a send
7348
+ is: `X-Auth-Confirm` step-up scored as a Send action, wallet
7349
+ access policies (`WalletAction::Sign`), and a refusal for
7350
+ wallets whose key is split or passkey-owned — those have no
7351
+ server-side key and will not fall back to one.
7352
+
7353
+
7354
+ EVM chains only.
7355
+ operationId: signTreasuryMessage
7356
+ parameters:
7357
+ - name: chain
7358
+ in: path
7359
+ required: true
7360
+ schema: { type: string, example: ethereum }
7361
+ - name: X-Auth-Confirm
7362
+ in: header
7363
+ required: true
7364
+ schema: { type: string }
7365
+ description: Account password, or a `rat_` token from `POST /v1/auth/reauth/complete`.
7366
+ requestBody:
7367
+ required: true
7368
+ content:
7369
+ application/json:
7370
+ schema:
7371
+ type: object
7372
+ required: [message]
7373
+ properties:
7374
+ message:
7375
+ type: string
7376
+ maxLength: 16384
7377
+ example: Sign in to Example at 2026-10-01T10:00:00Z
7378
+ responses:
7379
+ '200':
7380
+ description: Signature
7381
+ content:
7382
+ application/json:
7383
+ schema:
7384
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/WalletSignature'
7385
+ '400':
7386
+ description: Empty or oversized message, or a non-EVM chain
7387
+ '403':
7388
+ description: >
7389
+ Agent caller, missing or insufficient step-up, denied by a
7390
+ wallet access policy, or a self-custody wallet the server
7391
+ cannot sign for.
7392
+ '404':
7393
+ description: No wallet on that chain for this user
7394
+ /v1/treasury/wallets/{chain}/sign-typed-data:
7395
+ post:
7396
+ tags: [Treasury]
7397
+ summary: "Sign EIP-712 typed data with a human wallet"
7398
+ description: >
7399
+ Hashes and signs a full EIP-712 payload. Include
7400
+ `EIP712Domain` in `types` — viem and ethers synthesise that
7401
+ entry and omit it, and this hashes exactly what you send.
7402
+
7403
+
7404
+ Same gates as `sign-message`.
7405
+ operationId: signTreasuryTypedData
7406
+ parameters:
7407
+ - name: chain
7408
+ in: path
7409
+ required: true
7410
+ schema: { type: string, example: base }
7411
+ - name: X-Auth-Confirm
7412
+ in: header
7413
+ required: true
7414
+ schema: { type: string }
7415
+ requestBody:
7416
+ required: true
7417
+ content:
7418
+ application/json:
7419
+ schema:
7420
+ type: object
7421
+ required: [typed_data]
7422
+ properties:
7423
+ typed_data:
7424
+ type: object
7425
+ description: '`types`, `primaryType`, `domain`, `message`.'
7426
+ responses:
7427
+ '200':
7428
+ description: Signature
7429
+ content:
7430
+ application/json:
7431
+ schema:
7432
+ $ref: '#/components/schemas/WalletSignature'
7433
+ '400':
7434
+ description: Malformed EIP-712 payload, or a non-EVM chain
7435
+ '403':
7436
+ description: Same refusals as sign-message
7437
+ '404':
7438
+ description: No wallet on that chain for this user
7210
7439
  /v1/treasury/wallets/{chain}/swap:
7211
7440
  post:
7212
7441
  tags: [Treasury Wallets]
@@ -11159,6 +11388,113 @@ paths:
11159
11388
  "429":
11160
11389
  description: Rate limited
11161
11390
 
11391
+ /v1/auth/siwe/challenge:
11392
+ post:
11393
+ tags: [Authentication]
11394
+ summary: Start wallet sign-in (SIWE)
11395
+ description: |
11396
+ Returns the exact EIP-4361 message to sign, for signing in to the
11397
+ dashboard with an Ethereum wallet.
11398
+
11399
+ The message is built server-side and returned whole: the domain and
11400
+ the nonce are ours to decide, and a client that assembles its own
11401
+ message is a client that can be talked into signing a different
11402
+ one. Sign it unmodified and post it back to
11403
+ `/v1/auth/siwe/verify`.
11404
+
11405
+ The nonce is single-use and valid for five minutes. Distinct from
11406
+ `/v1/platform/siwe/challenge`, which needs a `plt_` caller and
11407
+ issues nonces scoped to one platform app for *its* end users.
11408
+ operationId: siweLoginChallenge
11409
+ security: []
11410
+ requestBody:
11411
+ required: true
11412
+ content:
11413
+ application/json:
11414
+ schema:
11415
+ type: object
11416
+ required: [address]
11417
+ properties:
11418
+ address:
11419
+ type: string
11420
+ description: 0x-prefixed 20-byte Ethereum address
11421
+ example: "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000001"
11422
+ responses:
11423
+ "200":
11424
+ description: Message to sign
11425
+ content:
11426
+ application/json:
11427
+ schema:
11428
+ type: object
11429
+ properties:
11430
+ message:
11431
+ type: string
11432
+ description: Sign this verbatim
11433
+ nonce: { type: string }
11434
+ expires_in_secs: { type: integer }
11435
+ "400":
11436
+ description: Not a valid Ethereum address
11437
+ "429":
11438
+ description: Rate limited
11439
+
11440
+ /v1/auth/siwe/verify:
11441
+ post:
11442
+ tags: [Authentication]
11443
+ summary: Complete wallet sign-in and get a JWT
11444
+ description: |
11445
+ Verifies the signature over the challenge message and returns an
11446
+ ordinary user JWT — the same token social login and email-OTP
11447
+ produce.
11448
+
11449
+ First sign-in for an address creates a user and org. That user's
11450
+ email starts synthetic (`email_pending: true`) and unverified: a
11451
+ wallet signature proves possession of a key, not a reachable
11452
+ person. Staking redemption refuses until a real address is added
11453
+ and confirmed.
11454
+
11455
+ The wallet recovered from the signature is stored on the account
11456
+ and is the identity staking points are counted against. It is
11457
+ never accepted from a request body anywhere.
11458
+ operationId: siweLoginVerify
11459
+ security: []
11460
+ requestBody:
11461
+ required: true
11462
+ content:
11463
+ application/json:
11464
+ schema:
11465
+ type: object
11466
+ required: [message, signature]
11467
+ properties:
11468
+ message:
11469
+ type: string
11470
+ description: The challenge message, unmodified
11471
+ signature:
11472
+ type: string
11473
+ description: Hex signature over the message
11474
+ responses:
11475
+ "200":
11476
+ description: Authenticated
11477
+ content:
11478
+ application/json:
11479
+ schema:
11480
+ type: object
11481
+ properties:
11482
+ token: { type: string }
11483
+ user_id: { type: string, format: uuid }
11484
+ org_id: { type: string, format: uuid }
11485
+ wallet_address: { type: string }
11486
+ is_new_user: { type: boolean }
11487
+ email_pending:
11488
+ type: boolean
11489
+ description: |
11490
+ True while the account email is still the synthetic
11491
+ wallet address. Redemption is blocked until a real
11492
+ one is verified.
11493
+ "400":
11494
+ description: Expired or reused challenge, or a message signed for another domain
11495
+ "401":
11496
+ description: Signature does not match the address in the message
11497
+
11162
11498
  # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
11163
11499
  # OAuth
11164
11500
  # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -18279,8 +18615,22 @@ paths:
18279
18615
  the read grant could not be written —
18280
18616
  the agent will need access granted
18281
18617
  by hand.
18618
+ bound_new_vault:
18619
+ type: boolean
18620
+ description: >
18621
+ True when the agent had to be bound to
18622
+ a vault it was not bound to before. Its
18623
+ access is correct from now on, but a
18624
+ JWT carries the `vault_ids` it was
18625
+ minted with, so a token the agent
18626
+ already holds is refused until it
18627
+ re-mints. Answering into a vault the
18628
+ agent already reaches avoids this.
18282
18629
  '400':
18283
- description: Already answered, expired, or an invalid path
18630
+ description: >
18631
+ Already answered, expired, an invalid path, or nothing is
18632
+ stored at that path — the location the agent is sent to has
18633
+ to be real.
18284
18634
  '403':
18285
18635
  description: Called by an agent
18286
18636
  '404':
@@ -27298,6 +27648,18 @@ components:
27298
27648
  an approval by reply.
27299
27649
  created_at: { type: string, format: date-time }
27300
27650
 
27651
+ WalletSignature:
27652
+ type: object
27653
+ required: [signature, address, chain]
27654
+ properties:
27655
+ signature:
27656
+ type: string
27657
+ description: 65-byte `0x`-prefixed signature, r‖s‖v.
27658
+ address:
27659
+ type: string
27660
+ description: The signing wallet, so it can be passed straight to `verifyMessage`.
27661
+ chain: { type: string }
27662
+
27301
27663
  SecretRequest:
27302
27664
  type: object
27303
27665
  description: >
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@1claw/openapi-spec",
3
- "version": "0.61.47",
4
- "description": "OpenAPI 3.1.0 specification for the 1Claw Vault API — generate clients in any language",
3
+ "version": "0.61.49",
4
+ "description": "OpenAPI 3.1.0 specification for the 1Claw Vault API \u2014 generate clients in any language",
5
5
  "license": "MIT",
6
6
  "repository": {
7
7
  "type": "git",