@0xsown/vibe-code-fe 1.0.0

package/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/rules/state-context-interface.md

@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+---
+title: Define Generic Context Interfaces for Dependency Injection
+impact: HIGH
+impactDescription: enables dependency-injectable state across use-cases
+tags: composition, context, state, typescript, dependency-injection
+---
+
+## Define Generic Context Interfaces for Dependency Injection
+
+Define a **generic interface** for your component context with three parts:
+`state`, `actions`, and `meta`. This interface is a contract that any provider
+can implement—enabling the same UI components to work with completely different
+state implementations.
+
+**Core principle:** Lift state, compose internals, make state
+dependency-injectable.
+
+**Incorrect (UI coupled to specific state implementation):**
+
+```tsx
+function ComposerInput() {
+  // Tightly coupled to a specific hook
+  const { input, setInput } = useChannelComposerState()
+  return <TextInput value={input} onChangeText={setInput} />
+}
+```
+
+**Correct (generic interface enables dependency injection):**
+
+```tsx
+// Define a GENERIC interface that any provider can implement
+interface ComposerState {
+  input: string
+  attachments: Attachment[]
+  isSubmitting: boolean
+}
+
+interface ComposerActions {
+  update: (updater: (state: ComposerState) => ComposerState) => void
+  submit: () => void
+}
+
+interface ComposerMeta {
+  inputRef: React.RefObject<TextInput>
+}
+
+interface ComposerContextValue {
+  state: ComposerState
+  actions: ComposerActions
+  meta: ComposerMeta
+}
+
+const ComposerContext = createContext<ComposerContextValue | null>(null)
+```
+
+**UI components consume the interface, not the implementation:**
+
+```tsx
+function ComposerInput() {
+  const {
+    state,
+    actions: { update },
+    meta,
+  } = use(ComposerContext)
+
+  // This component works with ANY provider that implements the interface
+  return (
+    <TextInput
+      ref={meta.inputRef}
+      value={state.input}
+      onChangeText={(text) => update((s) => ({ ...s, input: text }))}
+    />
+  )
+}
+```
+
+**Different providers implement the same interface:**
+
+```tsx
+// Provider A: Local state for ephemeral forms
+function ForwardMessageProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
+  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
+  const inputRef = useRef(null)
+  const submit = useForwardMessage()
+
+  return (
+    <ComposerContext
+      value={{
+        state,
+        actions: { update: setState, submit },
+        meta: { inputRef },
+      }}
+    >
+      {children}
+    </ComposerContext>
+  )
+}
+
+// Provider B: Global synced state for channels
+function ChannelProvider({ channelId, children }: Props) {
+  const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId)
+  const inputRef = useRef(null)
+
+  return (
+    <ComposerContext
+      value={{
+        state,
+        actions: { update, submit },
+        meta: { inputRef },
+      }}
+    >
+      {children}
+    </ComposerContext>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+**The same composed UI works with both:**
+
+```tsx
+// Works with ForwardMessageProvider (local state)
+<ForwardMessageProvider>
+  <Composer.Frame>
+    <Composer.Input />
+    <Composer.Submit />
+  </Composer.Frame>
+</ForwardMessageProvider>
+
+// Works with ChannelProvider (global synced state)
+<ChannelProvider channelId="abc">
+  <Composer.Frame>
+    <Composer.Input />
+    <Composer.Submit />
+  </Composer.Frame>
+</ChannelProvider>
+```
+
+**Custom UI outside the component can access state and actions:**
+
+The provider boundary is what matters—not the visual nesting. Components that
+need shared state don't have to be inside the `Composer.Frame`. They just need
+to be within the provider.
+
+```tsx
+function ForwardMessageDialog() {
+  return (
+    <ForwardMessageProvider>
+      <Dialog>
+        {/* The composer UI */}
+        <Composer.Frame>
+          <Composer.Input placeholder="Add a message, if you'd like." />
+          <Composer.Footer>
+            <Composer.Formatting />
+            <Composer.Emojis />
+          </Composer.Footer>
+        </Composer.Frame>
+
+        {/* Custom UI OUTSIDE the composer, but INSIDE the provider */}
+        <MessagePreview />
+
+        {/* Actions at the bottom of the dialog */}
+        <DialogActions>
+          <CancelButton />
+          <ForwardButton />
+        </DialogActions>
+      </Dialog>
+    </ForwardMessageProvider>
+  )
+}
+
+// This button lives OUTSIDE Composer.Frame but can still submit based on its context!
+function ForwardButton() {
+  const {
+    actions: { submit },
+  } = use(ComposerContext)
+  return <Button onPress={submit}>Forward</Button>
+}
+
+// This preview lives OUTSIDE Composer.Frame but can read composer's state!
+function MessagePreview() {
+  const { state } = use(ComposerContext)
+  return <Preview message={state.input} attachments={state.attachments} />
+}
+```
+
+The `ForwardButton` and `MessagePreview` are not visually inside the composer
+box, but they can still access its state and actions. This is the power of
+lifting state into providers.
+
+The UI is reusable bits you compose together. The state is dependency-injected
+by the provider. Swap the provider, keep the UI.

package/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/rules/state-decouple-implementation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+---
+title: Decouple State Management from UI
+impact: MEDIUM
+impactDescription: enables swapping state implementations without changing UI
+tags: composition, state, architecture
+---
+
+## Decouple State Management from UI
+
+The provider component should be the only place that knows how state is managed.
+UI components consume the context interface—they don't know if state comes from
+useState, Zustand, or a server sync.
+
+**Incorrect (UI coupled to state implementation):**
+
+```tsx
+function ChannelComposer({ channelId }: { channelId: string }) {
+  // UI component knows about global state implementation
+  const state = useGlobalChannelState(channelId)
+  const { submit, updateInput } = useChannelSync(channelId)
+
+  return (
+    <Composer.Frame>
+      <Composer.Input
+        value={state.input}
+        onChange={(text) => sync.updateInput(text)}
+      />
+      <Composer.Submit onPress={() => sync.submit()} />
+    </Composer.Frame>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+**Correct (state management isolated in provider):**
+
+```tsx
+// Provider handles all state management details
+function ChannelProvider({
+  channelId,
+  children,
+}: {
+  channelId: string
+  children: React.ReactNode
+}) {
+  const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId)
+  const inputRef = useRef(null)
+
+  return (
+    <Composer.Provider
+      state={state}
+      actions={{ update, submit }}
+      meta={{ inputRef }}
+    >
+      {children}
+    </Composer.Provider>
+  )
+}
+
+// UI component only knows about the context interface
+function ChannelComposer() {
+  return (
+    <Composer.Frame>
+      <Composer.Header />
+      <Composer.Input />
+      <Composer.Footer>
+        <Composer.Submit />
+      </Composer.Footer>
+    </Composer.Frame>
+  )
+}
+
+// Usage
+function Channel({ channelId }: { channelId: string }) {
+  return (
+    <ChannelProvider channelId={channelId}>
+      <ChannelComposer />
+    </ChannelProvider>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+**Different providers, same UI:**
+
+```tsx
+// Local state for ephemeral forms
+function ForwardMessageProvider({ children }) {
+  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
+  const forwardMessage = useForwardMessage()
+
+  return (
+    <Composer.Provider
+      state={state}
+      actions={{ update: setState, submit: forwardMessage }}
+    >
+      {children}
+    </Composer.Provider>
+  )
+}
+
+// Global synced state for channels
+function ChannelProvider({ channelId, children }) {
+  const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId)
+
+  return (
+    <Composer.Provider state={state} actions={{ update, submit }}>
+      {children}
+    </Composer.Provider>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+The same `Composer.Input` component works with both providers because it only
+depends on the context interface, not the implementation.

package/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/rules/state-lift-state.md

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+---
+title: Lift State into Provider Components
+impact: HIGH
+impactDescription: enables state sharing outside component boundaries
+tags: composition, state, context, providers
+---
+
+## Lift State into Provider Components
+
+Move state management into dedicated provider components. This allows sibling
+components outside the main UI to access and modify state without prop drilling
+or awkward refs.
+
+**Incorrect (state trapped inside component):**
+
+```tsx
+function ForwardMessageComposer() {
+  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
+  const forwardMessage = useForwardMessage()
+
+  return (
+    <Composer.Frame>
+      <Composer.Input />
+      <Composer.Footer />
+    </Composer.Frame>
+  )
+}
+
+// Problem: How does this button access composer state?
+function ForwardMessageDialog() {
+  return (
+    <Dialog>
+      <ForwardMessageComposer />
+      <MessagePreview /> {/* Needs composer state */}
+      <DialogActions>
+        <CancelButton />
+        <ForwardButton /> {/* Needs to call submit */}
+      </DialogActions>
+    </Dialog>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+**Incorrect (useEffect to sync state up):**
+
+```tsx
+function ForwardMessageDialog() {
+  const [input, setInput] = useState('')
+  return (
+    <Dialog>
+      <ForwardMessageComposer onInputChange={setInput} />
+      <MessagePreview input={input} />
+    </Dialog>
+  )
+}
+
+function ForwardMessageComposer({ onInputChange }) {
+  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
+  useEffect(() => {
+    onInputChange(state.input) // Sync on every change 😬
+  }, [state.input])
+}
+```
+
+**Incorrect (reading state from ref on submit):**
+
+```tsx
+function ForwardMessageDialog() {
+  const stateRef = useRef(null)
+  return (
+    <Dialog>
+      <ForwardMessageComposer stateRef={stateRef} />
+      <ForwardButton onPress={() => submit(stateRef.current)} />
+    </Dialog>
+  )
+}
+```
+
+**Correct (state lifted to provider):**
+
+```tsx
+function ForwardMessageProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
+  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
+  const forwardMessage = useForwardMessage()
+  const inputRef = useRef(null)
+
+  return (
+    <Composer.Provider
+      state={state}
+      actions={{ update: setState, submit: forwardMessage }}
+      meta={{ inputRef }}
+    >
+      {children}
+    </Composer.Provider>
+  )
+}
+
+function ForwardMessageDialog() {
+  return (
+    <ForwardMessageProvider>
+      <Dialog>
+        <ForwardMessageComposer />
+        <MessagePreview /> {/* Custom components can access state and actions */}
+        <DialogActions>
+          <CancelButton />
+          <ForwardButton /> {/* Custom components can access state and actions */}
+        </DialogActions>
+      </Dialog>
+    </ForwardMessageProvider>
+  )
+}
+
+function ForwardButton() {
+  const { actions } = use(Composer.Context)
+  return <Button onPress={actions.submit}>Forward</Button>
+}
+```
+
+The ForwardButton lives outside the Composer.Frame but still has access to the
+submit action because it's within the provider. Even though it's a one-off
+component, it can still access the composer's state and actions from outside the
+UI itself.
+
+**Key insight:** Components that need shared state don't have to be visually
+nested inside each other—they just need to be within the same provider.