validate_block 0.1.0 → 0.2.0
Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
- data/History.txt +10 -0
- data/README.rdoc +13 -16
- data/Rakefile +1 -1
- data/lib/validate_block.rb +9 -3
- data/spec/spec_helper.rb +17 -0
- data/spec/validate_block_spec.rb +36 -1
- metadata +7 -9
data/History.txt
CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
|
|
1
|
+
=== 0.2.0 2010-09-13
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
* changed method_missing to accept params in *args to fix bug where
|
4
|
+
'validates_presence_of' would fail if more than one attribute was
|
5
|
+
given.
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
=== 0.1.1 2010-09-10
|
8
|
+
|
9
|
+
* added specs from justinbaker
|
10
|
+
|
1
11
|
=== 0.1 2010-08-20
|
2
12
|
|
3
13
|
* Initial release
|
data/README.rdoc
CHANGED
@@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ This gem allows similar ActiveRecord validates_* commands to be grouped together
|
|
8
8
|
|
9
9
|
How often have you had a block of validation commands in an ActiveRecord object that are repeated, especially :id or :unless options? Does this look familiar?
|
10
10
|
|
11
|
-
validates_presence_of :hair, :unless => :bald?
|
11
|
+
validates_presence_of :hair, :hair_color, :unless => :bald?
|
12
12
|
validates_length_of :hair, :within => 3..15, :unless => :bald?
|
13
13
|
validates_inclusion_of :hair_color, :in => HAIR_COLORS, :unless => bald?
|
14
14
|
|
15
15
|
Instead, this gem will allow you to replace the above code with:
|
16
16
|
|
17
17
|
validate_block :unless => :bald? do
|
18
|
-
presence_of :hair
|
18
|
+
presence_of :hair, :hair_color
|
19
19
|
length_of :hair, :within => 3..15
|
20
20
|
inclusion_of :hair_color, :in => HAIR_COLORS
|
21
21
|
end
|
@@ -24,29 +24,26 @@ Instead, this gem will allow you to replace the above code with:
|
|
24
24
|
|
25
25
|
Basically, this gem 1) removes the requirement to have 'validates_' on the front of the commands and 2) passes the options on the validate_block command to each validation command inside the block.
|
26
26
|
|
27
|
-
The syntax of the validation commands remains the same. Keeping the '
|
28
|
-
|
29
|
-
WARNING: There are no specs for this yet because I suck. Actually, it's because I don't properly understand how to spec a module like this so any help on that front would be appreciated.
|
27
|
+
The syntax of the validation commands remains the same. Keeping the 'validates_*' prefix on the commands inside the block _will_ work but it is not required.
|
30
28
|
|
31
29
|
== SYNOPSIS:
|
32
30
|
|
33
|
-
require 'rubygems'
|
34
|
-
require 'activerecord'
|
35
|
-
require 'validate_block'
|
31
|
+
require 'rubygems'
|
32
|
+
require 'activerecord'
|
33
|
+
require 'validate_block'
|
36
34
|
|
37
|
-
class SomeObject < ActiveRecord::Base
|
35
|
+
class SomeObject < ActiveRecord::Base
|
38
36
|
|
39
|
-
|
40
|
-
|
41
|
-
|
42
|
-
|
37
|
+
validate_block :if => :some_method? do
|
38
|
+
presence_of :some_field
|
39
|
+
inclusion_of :some_other_field, :in => SOME_VALUES
|
40
|
+
end
|
43
41
|
|
44
|
-
end
|
42
|
+
end
|
45
43
|
|
46
44
|
== REQUIREMENTS:
|
47
45
|
|
48
|
-
ActiveRecord >= 2.1.0
|
49
|
-
Rspec (for specs)
|
46
|
+
ActiveRecord >= 2.1.0
|
50
47
|
|
51
48
|
== INSTALL:
|
52
49
|
|
data/Rakefile
CHANGED
data/lib/validate_block.rb
CHANGED
@@ -9,11 +9,17 @@ module ActiveRecord
|
|
9
9
|
yield
|
10
10
|
end
|
11
11
|
|
12
|
-
def method_missing(name,
|
12
|
+
def method_missing(name, *args, &block)
|
13
|
+
if args.last.class == Hash
|
14
|
+
args.last.merge!(@block_opts)
|
15
|
+
else
|
16
|
+
args << @block_opts
|
17
|
+
end
|
18
|
+
|
13
19
|
if name.to_s =~ /^validates_/
|
14
|
-
send(name,
|
20
|
+
send(name, *args)
|
15
21
|
elsif respond_to?(("validates_"+name.to_s).to_sym)
|
16
|
-
send(("validates_"+name.to_s).to_sym,
|
22
|
+
send(("validates_"+name.to_s).to_sym, *args)
|
17
23
|
else
|
18
24
|
super
|
19
25
|
end
|
data/spec/spec_helper.rb
CHANGED
@@ -7,4 +7,21 @@ rescue LoadError
|
|
7
7
|
end
|
8
8
|
|
9
9
|
$:.unshift(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../lib')
|
10
|
+
require 'rubygems'
|
11
|
+
require 'active_record'
|
12
|
+
require 'active_record/version'
|
13
|
+
require 'action_controller'
|
14
|
+
require 'action_view'
|
15
|
+
require 'action_mailer'
|
16
|
+
|
17
|
+
|
18
|
+
ActiveRecord::Migration.verbose = false
|
19
|
+
ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection({:adapter => 'sqlite3', :database => ':memory:'})
|
20
|
+
ActiveRecord::Schema.define do
|
21
|
+
create_table :people do |table|
|
22
|
+
table.column :hair, :string
|
23
|
+
table.column :hair_color, :string
|
24
|
+
end
|
25
|
+
end
|
26
|
+
|
10
27
|
require 'validate_block'
|
data/spec/validate_block_spec.rb
CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,40 @@
|
|
1
1
|
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/spec_helper.rb'
|
2
2
|
|
3
|
+
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
|
4
|
+
|
5
|
+
HAIR_COLORS = %w{blond brown black}
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
def bald?
|
8
|
+
hair.nil?
|
9
|
+
end
|
10
|
+
|
11
|
+
validate_block :unless => :bald? do
|
12
|
+
presence_of :hair, :hair_color
|
13
|
+
length_of :hair, :within => 3..15
|
14
|
+
inclusion_of :hair_color, :in => HAIR_COLORS
|
15
|
+
end
|
16
|
+
|
17
|
+
end
|
3
18
|
describe "validate_block" do
|
4
|
-
|
19
|
+
|
20
|
+
before(:each) do
|
21
|
+
@person = Person.new
|
22
|
+
end
|
23
|
+
|
24
|
+
it "returns true" do
|
25
|
+
@person.save.should == true #:nohair:
|
26
|
+
end
|
27
|
+
|
28
|
+
it "returns an error for long hair" do
|
29
|
+
@person.hair = "a lot of effin hair mannnnn"
|
30
|
+
@person.save.should == false
|
31
|
+
end
|
32
|
+
|
33
|
+
it "returns an error for red hair" do
|
34
|
+
|
35
|
+
@person.hair = "short"
|
36
|
+
@person.hair_color = "red"
|
37
|
+
@person.save.should == false
|
38
|
+
end
|
39
|
+
|
5
40
|
end
|
metadata
CHANGED
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
|
|
1
1
|
--- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification
|
2
2
|
name: validate_block
|
3
3
|
version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version
|
4
|
-
hash:
|
4
|
+
hash: 23
|
5
5
|
prerelease: false
|
6
6
|
segments:
|
7
7
|
- 0
|
8
|
-
-
|
8
|
+
- 2
|
9
9
|
- 0
|
10
|
-
version: 0.
|
10
|
+
version: 0.2.0
|
11
11
|
platform: ruby
|
12
12
|
authors:
|
13
13
|
- Matthew Nielsen
|
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ autorequire:
|
|
15
15
|
bindir: bin
|
16
16
|
cert_chain: []
|
17
17
|
|
18
|
-
date: 2010-
|
18
|
+
date: 2010-09-13 00:00:00 -06:00
|
19
19
|
default_executable:
|
20
20
|
dependencies:
|
21
21
|
- !ruby/object:Gem::Dependency
|
@@ -55,14 +55,14 @@ description: |-
|
|
55
55
|
|
56
56
|
How often have you had a block of validation commands in an ActiveRecord object that are repeated, especially :id or :unless options? Does this look familiar?
|
57
57
|
|
58
|
-
validates_presence_of :hair, :unless => :bald?
|
58
|
+
validates_presence_of :hair, :hair_color, :unless => :bald?
|
59
59
|
validates_length_of :hair, :within => 3..15, :unless => :bald?
|
60
60
|
validates_inclusion_of :hair_color, :in => HAIR_COLORS, :unless => bald?
|
61
61
|
|
62
62
|
Instead, this gem will allow you to replace the above code with:
|
63
63
|
|
64
64
|
validate_block :unless => :bald? do
|
65
|
-
presence_of :hair
|
65
|
+
presence_of :hair, :hair_color
|
66
66
|
length_of :hair, :within => 3..15
|
67
67
|
inclusion_of :hair_color, :in => HAIR_COLORS
|
68
68
|
end
|
@@ -71,9 +71,7 @@ description: |-
|
|
71
71
|
|
72
72
|
Basically, this gem 1) removes the requirement to have 'validates_' on the front of the commands and 2) passes the options on the validate_block command to each validation command inside the block.
|
73
73
|
|
74
|
-
The syntax of the validation commands remains the same. Keeping the '
|
75
|
-
|
76
|
-
WARNING: There are no specs for this yet because I suck. Actually, it's because I don't properly understand how to spec a module like this so any help on that front would be appreciated.
|
74
|
+
The syntax of the validation commands remains the same. Keeping the 'validates_*' prefix on the commands inside the block _will_ work but it is not required.
|
77
75
|
email:
|
78
76
|
- xunker@pyxidis.org
|
79
77
|
executables: []
|