vagrant-unbundled 1.9.5.1 → 1.9.7.1

data/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/rspec-expectations-3.5.0/lib/rspec/matchers/built_in/compound.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,272 @@
+module RSpec
+  module Matchers
+    module BuiltIn
+      # @api private
+      # Base class for `and` and `or` compound matchers.
+      # rubocop:disable ClassLength
+      class Compound < BaseMatcher
+        # @private
+        attr_reader :matcher_1, :matcher_2, :evaluator
+
+        def initialize(matcher_1, matcher_2)
+          @matcher_1 = matcher_1
+          @matcher_2 = matcher_2
+        end
+
+        # @private
+        def does_not_match?(_actual)
+          raise NotImplementedError, "`expect(...).not_to matcher.#{conjunction} matcher` " \
+            "is not supported, since it creates a bit of an ambiguity. Instead, define negated versions " \
+            "of whatever matchers you wish to negate with `RSpec::Matchers.define_negated_matcher` and " \
+            "use `expect(...).to matcher.#{conjunction} matcher`."
+        end
+
+        # @api private
+        # @return [String]
+        def description
+          "#{matcher_1.description} #{conjunction} #{matcher_2.description}"
+        end
+
+        def supports_block_expectations?
+          matcher_supports_block_expectations?(matcher_1) &&
+          matcher_supports_block_expectations?(matcher_2)
+        end
+
+        def expects_call_stack_jump?
+          NestedEvaluator.matcher_expects_call_stack_jump?(matcher_1) ||
+          NestedEvaluator.matcher_expects_call_stack_jump?(matcher_2)
+        end
+
+        # @api private
+        # @return [Boolean]
+        def diffable?
+          matcher_is_diffable?(matcher_1) || matcher_is_diffable?(matcher_2)
+        end
+
+        # @api private
+        # @return [RSpec::Matchers::ExpectedsForMultipleDiffs]
+        def expected
+          return nil unless evaluator
+          ::RSpec::Matchers::ExpectedsForMultipleDiffs.for_many_matchers(diffable_matcher_list)
+        end
+
+      protected
+
+        def diffable_matcher_list
+          list = []
+          list.concat(diffable_matcher_list_for(matcher_1)) unless matcher_1_matches?
+          list.concat(diffable_matcher_list_for(matcher_2)) unless matcher_2_matches?
+          list
+        end
+
+      private
+
+        def initialize_copy(other)
+          @matcher_1 = @matcher_1.clone
+          @matcher_2 = @matcher_2.clone
+          super
+        end
+
+        def match(_expected, actual)
+          evaluator_klass = if supports_block_expectations? && Proc === actual
+                              NestedEvaluator
+                            else
+                              SequentialEvaluator
+                            end
+
+          @evaluator = evaluator_klass.new(actual, matcher_1, matcher_2)
+        end
+
+        def indent_multiline_message(message)
+          message.lines.map do |line|
+            line =~ /\S/ ? '   ' + line : line
+          end.join
+        end
+
+        def compound_failure_message
+          "#{indent_multiline_message(matcher_1.failure_message.sub(/\n+\z/, ''))}" \
+          "\n\n...#{conjunction}:" \
+          "\n\n#{indent_multiline_message(matcher_2.failure_message.sub(/\A\n+/, ''))}"
+        end
+
+        def matcher_1_matches?
+          evaluator.matcher_matches?(matcher_1)
+        end
+
+        def matcher_2_matches?
+          evaluator.matcher_matches?(matcher_2)
+        end
+
+        def matcher_supports_block_expectations?(matcher)
+          matcher.supports_block_expectations?
+        rescue NoMethodError
+          false
+        end
+
+        def matcher_is_diffable?(matcher)
+          matcher.diffable?
+        rescue NoMethodError
+          false
+        end
+
+        def diffable_matcher_list_for(matcher)
+          return [] unless matcher_is_diffable?(matcher)
+          return matcher.diffable_matcher_list if Compound === matcher
+          [matcher]
+        end
+
+        # For value expectations, we can evaluate the matchers sequentially.
+        class SequentialEvaluator
+          def initialize(actual, *)
+            @actual = actual
+          end
+
+          def matcher_matches?(matcher)
+            matcher.matches?(@actual)
+          end
+        end
+
+        # Normally, we evaluate the matching sequentially. For an expression like
+        # `expect(x).to foo.and bar`, this becomes:
+        #
+        #   expect(x).to foo
+        #   expect(x).to bar
+        #
+        # For block expectations, we need to nest them instead, so that
+        # `expect { x }.to foo.and bar` becomes:
+        #
+        #   expect {
+        #     expect { x }.to foo
+        #   }.to bar
+        #
+        # This is necessary so that the `expect` block is only executed once.
+        class NestedEvaluator
+          def initialize(actual, matcher_1, matcher_2)
+            @actual        = actual
+            @matcher_1     = matcher_1
+            @matcher_2     = matcher_2
+            @match_results = {}
+
+            inner, outer = order_block_matchers
+
+            @match_results[outer] = outer.matches?(Proc.new do |*args|
+              @match_results[inner] = inner.matches?(inner_matcher_block(args))
+            end)
+          end
+
+          def matcher_matches?(matcher)
+            @match_results.fetch(matcher)
+          end
+
+        private
+
+          # Some block matchers (such as `yield_xyz`) pass args to the `expect` block.
+          # When such a matcher is used as the outer matcher, we need to forward the
+          # the args on to the `expect` block.
+          def inner_matcher_block(outer_args)
+            return @actual if outer_args.empty?
+
+            Proc.new do |*inner_args|
+              unless inner_args.empty?
+                raise ArgumentError, "(#{@matcher_1.description}) and " \
+                  "(#{@matcher_2.description}) cannot be combined in a compound expectation " \
+                  "since both matchers pass arguments to the block."
+              end
+
+              @actual.call(*outer_args)
+            end
+          end
+
+          # For a matcher like `raise_error` or `throw_symbol`, where the block will jump
+          # up the call stack, we need to order things so that it is the inner matcher.
+          # For example, we need it to be this:
+          #
+          #   expect {
+          #     expect {
+          #       x += 1
+          #       raise "boom"
+          #     }.to raise_error("boom")
+          #   }.to change { x }.by(1)
+          #
+          # ...rather than:
+          #
+          #   expect {
+          #     expect {
+          #       x += 1
+          #       raise "boom"
+          #     }.to change { x }.by(1)
+          #   }.to raise_error("boom")
+          #
+          # In the latter case, the after-block logic in the `change` matcher would never
+          # get executed because the `raise "boom"` line would jump to the `rescue` in the
+          # `raise_error` logic, so only the former case will work properly.
+          #
+          # This method figures out which matcher should be the inner matcher and which
+          # should be the outer matcher.
+          def order_block_matchers
+            return @matcher_1, @matcher_2 unless self.class.matcher_expects_call_stack_jump?(@matcher_2)
+            return @matcher_2, @matcher_1 unless self.class.matcher_expects_call_stack_jump?(@matcher_1)
+
+            raise ArgumentError, "(#{@matcher_1.description}) and " \
+              "(#{@matcher_2.description}) cannot be combined in a compound expectation " \
+              "because they both expect a call stack jump."
+          end
+
+          def self.matcher_expects_call_stack_jump?(matcher)
+            matcher.expects_call_stack_jump?
+          rescue NoMethodError
+            false
+          end
+        end
+
+        # @api public
+        # Matcher used to represent a compound `and` expectation.
+        class And < self
+          # @api private
+          # @return [String]
+          def failure_message
+            if matcher_1_matches?
+              matcher_2.failure_message
+            elsif matcher_2_matches?
+              matcher_1.failure_message
+            else
+              compound_failure_message
+            end
+          end
+
+        private
+
+          def match(*)
+            super
+            matcher_1_matches? && matcher_2_matches?
+          end
+
+          def conjunction
+            "and"
+          end
+        end
+
+        # @api public
+        # Matcher used to represent a compound `or` expectation.
+        class Or < self
+          # @api private
+          # @return [String]
+          def failure_message
+            compound_failure_message
+          end
+
+        private
+
+          def match(*)
+            super
+            matcher_1_matches? || matcher_2_matches?
+          end
+
+          def conjunction
+            "or"
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/rspec-expectations-3.5.0/lib/rspec/matchers/built_in/contain_exactly.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+module RSpec
+  module Matchers
+    module BuiltIn
+      # @api private
+      # Provides the implementation for `contain_exactly` and `match_array`.
+      # Not intended to be instantiated directly.
+      class ContainExactly < BaseMatcher
+        # @api private
+        # @return [String]
+        def failure_message
+          if Array === actual
+            generate_failure_message
+          else
+            "expected a collection that can be converted to an array with " \
+            "`#to_ary` or `#to_a`, but got #{actual_formatted}"
+          end
+        end
+
+        # @api private
+        # @return [String]
+        def failure_message_when_negated
+          list = EnglishPhrasing.list(surface_descriptions_in(expected))
+          "expected #{actual_formatted} not to contain exactly#{list}"
+        end
+
+        # @api private
+        # @return [String]
+        def description
+          list = EnglishPhrasing.list(surface_descriptions_in(expected))
+          "contain exactly#{list}"
+        end
+
+      private
+
+        def generate_failure_message
+          message = expected_collection_line
+          message += actual_collection_line
+          message += missing_elements_line unless missing_items.empty?
+          message += extra_elements_line unless extra_items.empty?
+          message
+        end
+
+        def expected_collection_line
+          message_line('expected collection contained', expected, true)
+        end
+
+        def actual_collection_line
+          message_line('actual collection contained', actual)
+        end
+
+        def missing_elements_line
+          message_line('the missing elements were', missing_items, true)
+        end
+
+        def extra_elements_line
+          message_line('the extra elements were', extra_items)
+        end
+
+        def describe_collection(collection, surface_descriptions=false)
+          if surface_descriptions
+            "#{description_of(safe_sort(surface_descriptions_in collection))}\n"
+          else
+            "#{description_of(safe_sort(collection))}\n"
+          end
+        end
+
+        def message_line(prefix, collection, surface_descriptions=false)
+          "%-32s%s" % [prefix + ':',
+                       describe_collection(collection, surface_descriptions)]
+        end
+
+        def match(_expected, _actual)
+          return false unless convert_actual_to_an_array
+          match_when_sorted? || (extra_items.empty? && missing_items.empty?)
+        end
+
+        # This cannot always work (e.g. when dealing with unsortable items,
+        # or matchers as expected items), but it's practically free compared to
+        # the slowness of the full matching algorithm, and in common cases this
+        # works, so it's worth a try.
+        def match_when_sorted?
+          values_match?(safe_sort(expected), safe_sort(actual))
+        end
+
+        def convert_actual_to_an_array
+          if actual.respond_to?(:to_ary)
+            @actual = actual.to_ary
+          elsif should_enumerate?(actual) && actual.respond_to?(:to_a)
+            @actual = actual.to_a
+          else
+            return false
+          end
+        end
+
+        def safe_sort(array)
+          array.sort
+        rescue Support::AllExceptionsExceptOnesWeMustNotRescue
+          array
+        end
+
+        def missing_items
+          @missing_items ||= best_solution.unmatched_expected_indexes.map do |index|
+            expected[index]
+          end
+        end
+
+        def extra_items
+          @extra_items ||= best_solution.unmatched_actual_indexes.map do |index|
+            actual[index]
+          end
+        end
+
+        def best_solution
+          @best_solution ||= pairings_maximizer.find_best_solution
+        end
+
+        def pairings_maximizer
+          @pairings_maximizer ||= begin
+            expected_matches = Hash[Array.new(expected.size) { |i| [i, []] }]
+            actual_matches   = Hash[Array.new(actual.size)   { |i| [i, []] }]
+
+            expected.each_with_index do |e, ei|
+              actual.each_with_index do |a, ai|
+                next unless values_match?(e, a)
+
+                expected_matches[ei] << ai
+                actual_matches[ai] << ei
+              end
+            end
+
+            PairingsMaximizer.new(expected_matches, actual_matches)
+          end
+        end
+
+        # Once we started supporting composing matchers, the algorithm for this matcher got
+        # much more complicated. Consider this expression:
+        #
+        #   expect(["fool", "food"]).to contain_exactly(/foo/, /fool/)
+        #
+        # This should pass (because we can pair /fool/ with "fool" and /foo/ with "food"), but
+        # the original algorithm used by this matcher would pair the first elements it could
+        # (/foo/ with "fool"), which would leave /fool/ and "food" unmatched.  When we have
+        # an expected element which is a matcher that matches a superset of actual items
+        # compared to another expected element matcher, we need to consider every possible pairing.
+        #
+        # This class is designed to maximize the number of actual/expected pairings -- or,
+        # conversely, to minimize the number of unpaired items. It's essentially a brute
+        # force solution, but with a few heuristics applied to reduce the size of the
+        # problem space:
+        #
+        #   * Any items which match none of the items in the other list are immediately
+        #     placed into the `unmatched_expected_indexes` or `unmatched_actual_indexes` array.
+        #     The extra items and missing items in the matcher failure message are derived
+        #     from these arrays.
+        #   * Any items which reciprocally match only each other are paired up and not
+        #     considered further.
+        #
+        # What's left is only the items which match multiple items from the other list
+        # (or vice versa). From here, it performs a brute-force depth-first search,
+        # looking for a solution which pairs all elements in both lists, or, barring that,
+        # that produces the fewest unmatched items.
+        #
+        # @private
+        class PairingsMaximizer
+          Solution = Struct.new(:unmatched_expected_indexes,     :unmatched_actual_indexes,
+                                :indeterminate_expected_indexes, :indeterminate_actual_indexes) do
+            def worse_than?(other)
+              unmatched_item_count > other.unmatched_item_count
+            end
+
+            def candidate?
+              indeterminate_expected_indexes.empty? &&
+              indeterminate_actual_indexes.empty?
+            end
+
+            def ideal?
+              candidate? && (
+                unmatched_expected_indexes.empty? ||
+                unmatched_actual_indexes.empty?
+              )
+            end
+
+            def unmatched_item_count
+              unmatched_expected_indexes.count + unmatched_actual_indexes.count
+            end
+
+            def +(derived_candidate_solution)
+              self.class.new(
+                unmatched_expected_indexes + derived_candidate_solution.unmatched_expected_indexes,
+                unmatched_actual_indexes   + derived_candidate_solution.unmatched_actual_indexes,
+                # Ignore the indeterminate indexes: by the time we get here,
+                # we've dealt with all indeterminates.
+                [], []
+              )
+            end
+          end
+
+          attr_reader :expected_to_actual_matched_indexes, :actual_to_expected_matched_indexes, :solution
+
+          def initialize(expected_to_actual_matched_indexes, actual_to_expected_matched_indexes)
+            @expected_to_actual_matched_indexes = expected_to_actual_matched_indexes
+            @actual_to_expected_matched_indexes = actual_to_expected_matched_indexes
+
+            unmatched_expected_indexes, indeterminate_expected_indexes =
+              categorize_indexes(expected_to_actual_matched_indexes, actual_to_expected_matched_indexes)
+
+            unmatched_actual_indexes, indeterminate_actual_indexes =
+              categorize_indexes(actual_to_expected_matched_indexes, expected_to_actual_matched_indexes)
+
+            @solution = Solution.new(unmatched_expected_indexes,     unmatched_actual_indexes,
+                                     indeterminate_expected_indexes, indeterminate_actual_indexes)
+          end
+
+          def find_best_solution
+            return solution if solution.candidate?
+            best_solution_so_far = NullSolution
+
+            expected_index = solution.indeterminate_expected_indexes.first
+            actuals = expected_to_actual_matched_indexes[expected_index]
+
+            actuals.each do |actual_index|
+              solution = best_solution_for_pairing(expected_index, actual_index)
+              return solution if solution.ideal?
+              best_solution_so_far = solution if best_solution_so_far.worse_than?(solution)
+            end
+
+            best_solution_so_far
+          end
+
+        private
+
+          # @private
+          # Starting solution that is worse than any other real solution.
+          NullSolution = Class.new do
+            def self.worse_than?(_other)
+              true
+            end
+          end
+
+          def categorize_indexes(indexes_to_categorize, other_indexes)
+            unmatched     = []
+            indeterminate = []
+
+            indexes_to_categorize.each_pair do |index, matches|
+              if matches.empty?
+                unmatched << index
+              elsif !reciprocal_single_match?(matches, index, other_indexes)
+                indeterminate << index
+              end
+            end
+
+            return unmatched, indeterminate
+          end
+
+          def reciprocal_single_match?(matches, index, other_list)
+            return false unless matches.one?
+            other_list[matches.first] == [index]
+          end
+
+          def best_solution_for_pairing(expected_index, actual_index)
+            modified_expecteds = apply_pairing_to(
+              solution.indeterminate_expected_indexes,
+              expected_to_actual_matched_indexes, actual_index)
+
+            modified_expecteds.delete(expected_index)
+
+            modified_actuals = apply_pairing_to(
+              solution.indeterminate_actual_indexes,
+              actual_to_expected_matched_indexes, expected_index)
+
+            modified_actuals.delete(actual_index)
+
+            solution + self.class.new(modified_expecteds, modified_actuals).find_best_solution
+          end
+
+          def apply_pairing_to(indeterminates, original_matches, other_list_index)
+            indeterminates.inject({}) do |accum, index|
+              accum[index] = original_matches[index] - [other_list_index]
+              accum
+            end
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end