spreewald 2.2.1 → 2.2.2

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/overriding.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+Feature: Overriding Spreewald-steps
+
+  Scenario: The developer should be able to override any Spreewald step without Cucumber raising Cucumber::Ambiguous
+    When I go to "/static_pages/overridden"
+    Then I should see "overridden value"

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/step_definitions/overriding_steps.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Then /^I should see "overridden value"$/ do
+  expect(page).to have_content('overridden value')
+end

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/step_definitions/test_steps.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+require 'cucumber/rspec/doubles'
+
+RSPEC_EXPECTATION_NOT_MET_ERROR = RSpec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError
+
+Then /^the following steps? should (fail|succeed):$/ do |expectation, steps_table|
+  steps = steps_table.raw.flatten
+  
+  steps.each do |step|
+    if expectation == 'fail'
+      expect { step(step) }.to raise_error(RSPEC_EXPECTATION_NOT_MET_ERROR)
+    
+    else # succeed
+      step(step)
+    end
+
+  end
+end
+
+When /^I run the following steps?:$/ do |steps_table|
+  steps = steps_table.raw.flatten
+  
+  steps.each do |step|
+    step(step)
+  end
+end
+
+Then /^the following multiline step should (fail|succeed):$/ do |expectation, multiline_step|
+  multiline_step = multiline_step.gsub(%{'''}, %{"""})
+  if expectation == 'fail'
+    expect { steps(multiline_step) }.to raise_error(RSPEC_EXPECTATION_NOT_MET_ERROR)
+  else # succeed
+    steps(multiline_step)
+  end
+
+end
+
+Then(/^a hidden string with quotes should not be visible$/) do
+  hidden_string = %Q{hidden '" quotes}
+  assert_hidden(:text => hidden_string)
+end
+
+Then(/^a visible string with quotes should be visible$/) do
+  visible_string = %Q{visible '" quotes}
+  assert_visible(:text => visible_string)
+end
+
+Then(/^'show me the page' should open the page or take a screenshot$/) do
+  # Projects with Capybara 1 & 2 use the launchy gem
+  if Capybara::VERSION < "3.0"
+    expect(Launchy).to receive(:open)
+    step 'show me the page'
+  else
+    expect_any_instance_of(Capybara::Screenshot::Saver).to receive(:save)
+    step 'show me the page'
+  end
+end

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/support/paths.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+module NavigationHelpers
+  
+  def path_to(page_name)
+    case page_name
+    when /^"(.*)"$/
+      $1
+
+    else
+      raise "Can't find mapping from \"#{page_name}\" to a path.\n" +
+        "Now, go and add a mapping in #{__FILE__}"
+    end
+  end
+  
+end
+
+World(NavigationHelpers)

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/support/selectors.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+module HtmlSelectorsHelpers
+  # Maps a name to a selector. Used primarily by the
+  #
+  #   When /^(.+) within (.+)$/ do |step, scope|
+  #
+  # step definitions in web_steps.rb
+  #
+  def selector_for(locator)
+    case locator
+
+    when /^a panel?$/
+      '.panel'
+
+    when /^a panels nested contents?$/
+      '.panel--nested-contents'
+
+    when /^the timeline?$/
+      '.timeline'
+
+    when /^the table row containing "(.+?)"$/
+      all('tr').detect { |tr| tr.text.include? $1 } || raise("Could not find tr containing #{$1.inspect}")
+
+    when /^a table$/
+      '.table'
+
+      # Add more mappings here.
+      # Here is an example that pulls values out of the Regexp:
+      #
+      #  when /^the (notice|error|info) flash$/
+      #    ".flash.#{$1}"
+
+      # You can also return an array to use a different selector
+      # type, like:
+      #
+      #  when /the header/
+      #    [:xpath, "//header"]
+
+      # This allows you to provide a quoted selector as the scope
+      # for "within" steps as was previously the default for the
+      # web steps:
+    when /^"(.+)"$/
+      $1
+
+    else
+      raise "Can't find mapping from \"#{locator}\" to a selector.\n" +
+              "Now, go and add a mapping in #{__FILE__}"
+    end
+  end
+
+end
+
+World(HtmlSelectorsHelpers)

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/table_steps.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+Feature: Table steps
+
+
+  Scenario: should see a table with the following rows
+    When I go to "/tables/table1"
+    Then the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1* | 1-3 |
+        | 3* | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+      """
+    But the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | foo |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | foo | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1 | 1-3 |
+        | 3 | 3-3 |
+      """
+
+
+  Scenario: Cell content normalization
+    When I go to "/tables/table_with_weird_spaces"
+    Then I should see a table with the following rows:
+      | one two  | three four   |
+      | five six | seven eight  |
+      | nineten  | eleventwelve |
+
+
+  Scenario: should not see a table with the following rows
+    When I go to "/tables/table1"
+    Then the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    But the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with the following rows:
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+      """
+
+
+  Scenario: should see a table with exactly the following rows
+    When I go to "/tables/table1"
+    Then the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    But the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows:
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+
+
+  Scenario: should not see a table with exactly the following rows
+    When I go to "/tables/table1"
+    Then the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    But the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows:
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+
+
+  Scenario: should see a table with the following rows in any order
+    When I go to "/tables/table1"
+    Then the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+      """
+    But the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | foo |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 1 | 1-3 |
+        | 3 | 3-3 |
+      """
+
+
+  Scenario: should not see a table with the following rows in any order
+    When I go to "/tables/table1"
+    Then the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+      """
+    But the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | foo |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
+        | 1 | 1-3 |
+        | 3 | 3-3 |
+      """
+
+
+  Scenario: should see a table with exactly the following rows in any order
+    When I go to "/tables/table1"
+    Then the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+      """
+    But the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+
+
+  Scenario: should not see a table with exactly the following rows in any order
+    When I go to "/tables/table1"
+    Then the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """
+    And the following multiline step should fail:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
+      """
+    But the following multiline step should succeed:
+      """
+      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
+        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
+      """

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/web_steps.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+Feature: Web steps
+
+  Scenario: /^the "([^"]*)" field should (not )?contain "([^"]*)"$/
+    When I go to "/forms/form1"
+    Then the "Text control" field should contain "Text control value"
+    Then the "Text control" field should not contain "false text"
+    Then the "Select control" field should contain "Label 2"
+    Then the "Select control without selection" field should contain "Label 1"
+    Then the "Textarea control" field should contain "Textarea control value"
+    Then the "Empty control" field should contain ""
+
+
+  Scenario: /^the "([^"]*)" field should (not )?contain:/
+    When I go to "/forms/form2"
+    Then the "Text control" field should contain:
+      """
+      Text control value
+      """
+    Then the "Textarea control" field should contain:
+      """
+      Textarea control line 1
+      Textarea control line 2
+      """
+    Then the "Textarea control" field should not contain:
+      """
+      Textarea control wrong line 1
+      Textarea control wrong line 2
+      """
+    Then the "Empty textarea control" field should contain:
+      """
+      """
+
+
+  Scenario: /^the "([^\"]*)" field should( not)? have an error$/
+    When I go to "/forms/invalid_form"
+    Then the "Text control" field should have an error
+    Then the "Textarea control" field should have an error
+    Then the "Textarea control" field should have an error
+    Then the "Empty textarea control" field should not have an error
+
+
+  Scenario: /^the "([^"]*)" field should have no error$/
+    When I go to "/forms/invalid_form"
+    Then the "Empty textarea control" field should have no error
+
+
+  Scenario: /^I should see a form with the following values:$/
+    When I go to "/forms/form1"
+    Then I should see a form with the following values:
+      | Text control                     | Text control value     |
+      | Select control                   | Label 2                |
+      | Select control without selection | Label 1                |
+      | Textarea control                 | Textarea control value |
+      | Empty control                    |                        |
+
+
+  Scenario: /^"([^"]*)" should( not)? be selected for "([^"]*)"$/
+    When I go to "/forms/form1"
+    Then "Label 2" should be selected for "Select control"
+      But "Label 1" should not be selected for "Select control"
+      And "Label 1" should be selected for "Select control without selection"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^nothing should be selected for "([^"]*)"$/
+    When I go to "/forms/form1"
+    Then nothing should be selected for "Select control with blank option"
+    Then nothing should be selected for "Select control with blank selection"
+
+  Scenario: /^the radio button "([^"]*)" should( not)? be (?:checked|selected)$/
+    When I go to "/forms/form1"
+    Then the radio button "Radio 1" should not be selected
+    Then the radio button "Radio 2" should not be selected
+    When I choose "Radio 1"
+    Then the radio button "Radio 1" should be selected
+    Then the radio button "Radio 2" should not be selected
+    When I choose "Radio 2"
+    Then the radio button "Radio 1" should not be selected
+    Then the radio button "Radio 2" should be selected
+
+
+  Scenario: /^I go back$/
+    Given I go to "/static_pages/link_to_home"
+      And I follow "Home"
+    
+    When I go back
+    Then I should be on "/static_pages/link_to_home"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^the "([^"]*)" checkbox should( not)? be checked$/
+    When I go to "/forms/checkbox_form"
+    Then the "Checked" checkbox should be checked
+      And the "Unchecked" checkbox should not be checked
+
+
+  @javascript
+  Scenario: /^I click on "([^\"]+)"$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/click_on"
+      And I click on "Nested"
+    # See that it clicks the innermost element with that text
+    Then I should see "You clicked on .inner"
+    When I click on "Button"
+    Then I should see "You clicked on .button"
+
+
+  @javascript
+  Scenario: /^I click on the element "([^\"]+)"$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/click_on"
+    And I click on the element ".inner"
+    Then I should see "You clicked on .inner"
+    When I click on the element ".button"
+    Then I should see "You clicked on .button"
+
+
+  @javascript
+  Scenario: /^I click on the element for .*?$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/click_on"
+    And I click on the element for a panel
+    Then I should see "You clicked on .panel"
+
+    When I click on the element for the timeline
+    Then I should see "You clicked on .timeline"
+      But I should not see "You clicked on .panel"
+
+    When I click on the element for a panel within ".clickables"
+    Then I should see "You clicked on .panel"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^the "(.*?)" select should( not)? be sorted$/
+    When I go to "/forms/select_fields"
+    Then the "sorted" select should be sorted
+      But the "unsorted" select should not be sorted
+
+
+  Scenario: /^Then (the tag )?"..." should( not)? be visible$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/visibility"
+    Then "hidden ümläüt" should be hidden
+      And "visible ümläüt" should be visible
+      And a hidden string with quotes should not be visible
+      And a visible string with quotes should be visible
+      And "hidden ümläüt" should be hidden
+
+
+  @javascript
+  Scenario: /^Then (the tag )?"..." should( not)? be visible$/ with javascript
+    When I go to "/static_pages/visibility"
+    Then "hidden ümläüt" should be hidden
+    And "visible ümläüt" should be visible
+    And a hidden string with quotes should not be visible
+    And a visible string with quotes should be visible
+    And "hidden ümläüt" should be hidden
+
+
+  Scenario: /^the "([^\"]*)" field should( not)? be visible$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/visibility"
+    Then the "Visible field" field should be visible
+      But the "Hidden field" field should not be visible
+
+
+  @javascript
+  Scenario: /^the "([^\"]*)" field should( not)? be visible$/ with Javascript
+    When I go to "/static_pages/visibility"
+    Then the "Visible field" field should be visible
+      But the "Hidden field" field should not be visible
+
+
+  Scenario: /^I should (not )?see (?:an|the) element "([^"]+)"$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/see_element"
+    Then I should see an element ".panel"
+      And I should see the element ".panel"
+      And I should see the element ".panel--nested-contents" within ".panel"
+      And I should see the element ".panel--nested-contents" within a panel
+      But I should not see an element ".timeline"
+      But I should not see the element ".timeline"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^I should (not )?see (?:an|the) element for (.*?)$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/see_element"
+    Then I should see an element for a panel
+      And I should see the element for a panel
+      And I should see the element for a panels nested contents within ".panel"
+      And I should see the element for a panels nested contents within a panel
+      And I should not see an element for the timeline
+      And I should not see the element for the timeline
+
+
+  Scenario: /^((?:|I )should see "([^"]*)" within (.*[^:])$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/within"
+    Then I should see "Role" within ".table"
+      And I should see "Permissions" within a table
+    But I should not see "Nonsense" within ".table"
+      And I should not see "Nonsense" within a table
+
+
+  Scenario: /^(?:|I )should see \/([^\/]*)\/$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/within"
+    Then I should see /Shared Text/
+      And I should see /Unique Text/
+      And I should see /http://example.com/
+      And I should see /\^Will this text with special Regex characters match\.\.\?\$/
+    But I should not see /Nonsense/
+      And I should not see /http://other-domain.com/
+
+
+  Scenario: /^(?:|I )should see \/([^\/]*)\/ within (.*[^:])$/
+    When I go to "/static_pages/within"
+    Then I should see /Shared Text/ within ".scoped-element"
+      And I should see /Shared Text/ within ".unrelated-element"
+      And I should see /Unique Text/ within ".scoped-element"
+      And I should see /http://example.com/ within ".hardly-matchable-texts"
+      And I should see /\^Will this text with special Regex characters match\.\.\?\$/ within ".hardly-matchable-texts"
+    But I should not see /Unique Text/ within ".unrelated-element"
+      And I should not see /http://other-domain.com/ within ".unrelated-element"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^(.*) within (.*[^:])$/ with a Capybara::Node::Element
+    When I go to "/static_pages/within"
+    Then I should see "All" within the table row containing "Admin"
+
+
+  Scenario: the /^(.*) within (.*[^:])$/ step should not be invoked when the word "within" is used in an argument for another step
+    When I go to "/static_pages/within"
+    Then I should see "He lives within a few miles of Augsburg"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^I perform basic authentication as "([^\"]*)\/([^\"]*)" and go to (.*)$/
+    When I go to "/authenticated/page"
+    Then I should see "Access denied"
+    When I perform basic authentication as "user/password" and go to "/authenticated/page"
+    Then I should see "Action reached"
+
+
+  @javascript
+  Scenario: /^I perform basic authentication as "([^\"]*)\/([^\"]*)" and go to (.*)$/ with Javascript
+    When I perform basic authentication as "user/password" and go to "/authenticated/page"
+    Then I should see "Action reached"
+
+
+  @javascript
+  Scenario: /^show me the page$/
+    When I am on "/static_pages/home"
+    Then 'show me the page' should open the page or take a screenshot
+
+
+  Scenario: /^I should get a download with filename "([^\"]*)"$/
+    When I go to "/downloads/spreadsheet"
+    Then I should get a download with filename "test.ods"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^I should( not)? see a link labeled "([^"]*)"$/
+    When I am on "/static_pages/links"
+    Then I should see a link labeled "First visible link"
+      And I should see a link labeled "First visible link" within ".nested-link"
+      And I should see a link labeled "Also matches via the title attribute"
+    But I should not see a link labeled "Nonexistent Link"
+      And I should not see a link labeled "First visible link" within ".unrelated-element"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^I should( not)? see the (?:number|amount) ([\-\d,\.]+)(?: (.*?))?$/
+    When I am on "/static_pages/numbers"
+    Then I should see the number 1
+      And I should see the number 2.3
+      And I should see the number 4,5
+      And I should see the amount -60,72 €
+      And I should see the amount 13 €
+      And I should see the amount -10,000.99 EUR within ".nested-number"
+    But I should not see the number 2,3
+      And I should not see the number 4.5
+      And I should not see the number 60,72
+      And I should not see the amount -60,7 €
+      And I should not see the amount -10,000.99 EUR within ".unrelated-element"
+
+
+  Scenario: /^the "([^\"]*)" button should( not)? be disabled$/
+    When I go to "/forms/disabled_elements"
+    # buttons
+    Then the "Disabled button #1" button should be disabled
+      And the "Disabled button #2" button should be disabled
+      And the "Disabled button #3" button should be disabled
+      And the "Disabled button #4" button should be disabled
+    But the "Enabled button #1" button should not be disabled
+      And the "Enabled button #2" button should not be disabled
+
+      # checkboxes
+      And the "Disabled checkbox #1" checkbox should be disabled
+      And the "Disabled checkbox #2" checkbox should be disabled
+      And the "Disabled checkbox #3" checkbox should be disabled
+    But the "Enabled checkbox #1" checkbox should not be disabled
+      And the "Enabled checkbox #2" checkbox should not be disabled
+
+      # fields
+      And the "Disabled field #1" field should be disabled
+      And the "Disabled field #2" field should be disabled
+      And the "Disabled field #3" field should be disabled
+    But the "Enabled field #1" field should not be disabled
+      And the "Enabled field #2" field should not be disabled