spreewald 2.0.0 → 2.1.0

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/overriding.feature

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-Feature: Overriding Spreewald-steps
-
-  Scenario: The developer should be able to override any Spreewald step without Cucumber raising Cucumber::Ambiguous
-    When I go to "/static_pages/overridden"
-    Then I should see "overridden value"

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/step_definitions/overriding_steps.rb

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-Then /^I should see "overridden value"$/ do
-  expect(page).to have_content('overridden value')
-end

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/step_definitions/test_steps.rb

@@ -1,43 +0,0 @@
-RSPEC_EXPECTATION_NOT_MET_ERROR = RSpec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError
-
-Then /^the following steps? should (fail|succeed):$/ do |expectation, steps_table|
-  steps = steps_table.raw.flatten
-  
-  steps.each do |step|
-    if expectation == 'fail'
-      expect { step(step) }.to raise_error(RSPEC_EXPECTATION_NOT_MET_ERROR)
-    
-    else # succeed
-      step(step)
-    end
-
-  end
-end
-
-When /^I run the following steps?:$/ do |steps_table|
-  steps = steps_table.raw.flatten
-  
-  steps.each do |step|
-    step(step)
-  end
-end
-
-Then /^the following multiline step should (fail|succeed):$/ do |expectation, multiline_step|
-  multiline_step = multiline_step.gsub(%{'''}, %{"""})
-  if expectation == 'fail'
-    expect { steps(multiline_step) }.to raise_error(RSPEC_EXPECTATION_NOT_MET_ERROR)
-  else # succeed
-    steps(multiline_step)
-  end
-
-end
-
-Then(/^a hidden string with quotes should not be visible$/) do
-  hidden_string = %Q{hidden '" quotes}
-  assert_hidden(:text => hidden_string)
-end
-
-Then(/^a visible string with quotes should be visible$/) do
-  visible_string = %Q{visible '" quotes}
-  assert_visible(:text => visible_string)
-end

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/support/paths.rb

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-module NavigationHelpers
-  
-  def path_to(page_name)
-    case page_name
-    when /^"(.*)"$/
-      $1
-
-    else
-      raise "Can't find mapping from \"#{page_name}\" to a path.\n" +
-        "Now, go and add a mapping in #{__FILE__}"
-    end
-  end
-  
-end
-
-World(NavigationHelpers)

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/support/selectors.rb

@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
-module HtmlSelectorsHelpers
-  # Maps a name to a selector. Used primarily by the
-  #
-  #   When /^(.+) within (.+)$/ do |step, scope|
-  #
-  # step definitions in web_steps.rb
-  #
-  def selector_for(locator)
-    case locator
-
-    when /^a panel?$/
-      '.panel'
-
-    when /^a panels nested contents?$/
-      '.panel--nested-contents'
-
-    when /^the timeline?$/
-      '.timeline'
-
-    when /^the table row containing "(.+?)"$/
-      all('tr').detect { |tr| tr.text.include? $1 } || raise("Could not find tr containing #{$1.inspect}")
-
-    when /^a table$/
-      '.table'
-
-      # Add more mappings here.
-      # Here is an example that pulls values out of the Regexp:
-      #
-      #  when /^the (notice|error|info) flash$/
-      #    ".flash.#{$1}"
-
-      # You can also return an array to use a different selector
-      # type, like:
-      #
-      #  when /the header/
-      #    [:xpath, "//header"]
-
-      # This allows you to provide a quoted selector as the scope
-      # for "within" steps as was previously the default for the
-      # web steps:
-    when /^"(.+)"$/
-      $1
-
-    else
-      raise "Can't find mapping from \"#{locator}\" to a selector.\n" +
-              "Now, go and add a mapping in #{__FILE__}"
-    end
-  end
-
-end
-
-World(HtmlSelectorsHelpers)

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/table_steps.feature

@@ -1,293 +0,0 @@
-Feature: Table steps
-
-
-  Scenario: should see a table with the following rows
-    When I go to "/tables/table1"
-    Then the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1* | 1-3 |
-        | 3* | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-      """
-    But the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | foo |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | foo | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1 | 1-3 |
-        | 3 | 3-3 |
-      """
-
-
-  Scenario: Cell content normalization
-    When I go to "/tables/table_with_weird_spaces"
-    Then I should see a table with the following rows:
-      | one two  | three four   |
-      | five six | seven eight  |
-      | nineten  | eleventwelve |
-
-
-  Scenario: should not see a table with the following rows
-    When I go to "/tables/table1"
-    Then the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    But the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with the following rows:
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-      """
-
-
-  Scenario: should see a table with exactly the following rows
-    When I go to "/tables/table1"
-    Then the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    But the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows:
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-
-
-  Scenario: should not see a table with exactly the following rows
-    When I go to "/tables/table1"
-    Then the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    But the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows:
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-
-
-  Scenario: should see a table with the following rows in any order
-    When I go to "/tables/table1"
-    Then the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-      """
-    But the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | foo |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 1 | 1-3 |
-        | 3 | 3-3 |
-      """
-
-
-  Scenario: should not see a table with the following rows in any order
-    When I go to "/tables/table1"
-    Then the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-      """
-    But the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | foo |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with the following rows in any order:
-        | 1 | 1-3 |
-        | 3 | 3-3 |
-      """
-
-
-  Scenario: should see a table with exactly the following rows in any order
-    When I go to "/tables/table1"
-    Then the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-      """
-    But the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-
-
-  Scenario: should not see a table with exactly the following rows in any order
-    When I go to "/tables/table1"
-    Then the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """
-    And the following multiline step should fail:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 2-1 | 2-2 | 2-3 |
-      """
-    But the following multiline step should succeed:
-      """
-      Then I should not see a table with exactly the following rows in any order:
-        | 1-1 | 1-2 | 1-3 |
-        | 3-1 | 3-2 | 3-3 |
-      """

data/tests/rails-4_capybara-3/features/web_steps.feature

@@ -1,214 +0,0 @@
-Feature: Web steps
-
-  Scenario: /^the "([^"]*)" field should (not )?contain "([^"]*)"$/
-    When I go to "/forms/form1"
-    Then the "Text control" field should contain "Text control value"
-    Then the "Text control" field should not contain "false text"
-    Then the "Select control" field should contain "Label 2"
-    Then the "Select control without selection" field should contain "Label 1"
-    Then the "Textarea control" field should contain "Textarea control value"
-    Then the "Empty control" field should contain ""
-
-
-  Scenario: /^the "([^"]*)" field should (not )?contain:/
-    When I go to "/forms/form2"
-    Then the "Text control" field should contain:
-      """
-      Text control value
-      """
-    Then the "Textarea control" field should contain:
-      """
-      Textarea control line 1
-      Textarea control line 2
-      """
-    Then the "Textarea control" field should not contain:
-      """
-      Textarea control wrong line 1
-      Textarea control wrong line 2
-      """
-    Then the "Empty textarea control" field should contain:
-      """
-      """
-
-
-  Scenario: /^the "([^\"]*)" field should( not)? have an error$/
-    When I go to "/forms/invalid_form"
-    Then the "Text control" field should have an error
-    Then the "Textarea control" field should have an error
-    Then the "Textarea control" field should have an error
-    Then the "Empty textarea control" field should not have an error
-
-
-  Scenario: /^the "([^"]*)" field should have no error$/
-    When I go to "/forms/invalid_form"
-    Then the "Empty textarea control" field should have no error
-
-
-  Scenario: /^I should see a form with the following values:$/
-    When I go to "/forms/form1"
-    Then I should see a form with the following values:
-      | Text control                     | Text control value     |
-      | Select control                   | Label 2                |
-      | Select control without selection | Label 1                |
-      | Textarea control                 | Textarea control value |
-      | Empty control                    |                        |
-
-
-  Scenario: /^"([^"]*)" should( not)? be selected for "([^"]*)"$/
-    When I go to "/forms/form1"
-    Then "Label 2" should be selected for "Select control"
-      But "Label 1" should not be selected for "Select control"
-      And "Label 1" should be selected for "Select control without selection"
-
-
-  Scenario: /^nothing should be selected for "([^"]*)"$/
-    When I go to "/forms/form1"
-    Then nothing should be selected for "Select control with blank option"
-    Then nothing should be selected for "Select control with blank selection"
-
-  Scenario: /^the radio button "([^"]*)" should( not)? be (?:checked|selected)$/
-    When I go to "/forms/form1"
-    Then the radio button "Radio 1" should not be selected
-    Then the radio button "Radio 2" should not be selected
-    When I choose "Radio 1"
-    Then the radio button "Radio 1" should be selected
-    Then the radio button "Radio 2" should not be selected
-    When I choose "Radio 2"
-    Then the radio button "Radio 1" should not be selected
-    Then the radio button "Radio 2" should be selected
-
-
-  Scenario: /^I go back$/
-    Given I go to "/static_pages/link_to_home"
-      And I follow "Home"
-    
-    When I go back
-    Then I should be on "/static_pages/link_to_home"
-
-
-  Scenario: /^the "([^"]*)" checkbox should( not)? be checked$/
-    When I go to "/forms/checkbox_form"
-    Then the "Checked" checkbox should be checked
-      And the "Unchecked" checkbox should not be checked
-
-
-  @javascript
-  Scenario: /^I click on "([^\"]+)"$/
-    When I go to "/static_pages/click_on"
-      And I click on "Nested"
-    # See that it clicks the innermost element with that text
-    Then I should see "You clicked on .inner"
-    When I click on "Button"
-    Then I should see "You clicked on .button"
-
-
-  @javascript
-  Scenario: /^I click on the element "([^\"]+)"$/
-    When I go to "/static_pages/click_on"
-    And I click on the element ".inner"
-    Then I should see "You clicked on .inner"
-    When I click on the element ".button"
-    Then I should see "You clicked on .button"
-
-
-  @javascript
-  Scenario: /^I click on the element for .*?$/
-    When I go to "/static_pages/click_on"
-    And I click on the element for a panel
-    Then I should see "You clicked on .panel"
-
-    When I click on the element for the timeline
-    Then I should see "You clicked on .timeline"
-      But I should not see "You clicked on .panel"
-
-    When I click on the element for a panel within ".clickables"
-    Then I should see "You clicked on .panel"
-
-
-  Scenario: /^the "(.*?)" select should( not)? be sorted$/
-    When I go to "/forms/select_fields"
-    Then the "sorted" select should be sorted
-      But the "unsorted" select should not be sorted
-
-
-  Scenario: /^Then (the tag )?"..." should( not)? be visible$/
-    When I go to "/static_pages/visibility"
-    Then "hidden ümläüt" should be hidden
-      And "visible ümläüt" should be visible
-      And a hidden string with quotes should not be visible
-      And a visible string with quotes should be visible
-      And "hidden ümläüt" should be hidden
-
-
-  @javascript
-  Scenario: /^Then (the tag )?"..." should( not)? be visible$/ with javascript
-    When I go to "/static_pages/visibility"
-    Then "hidden ümläüt" should be hidden
-    And "visible ümläüt" should be visible
-    And a hidden string with quotes should not be visible
-    And a visible string with quotes should be visible
-    And "hidden ümläüt" should be hidden
-
-
-  Scenario: /^the "([^\"]*)" field should( not)? be visible$/
-    When I go to "/static_pages/visibility"
-    Then the "Visible field" field should be visible
-      But the "Hidden field" field should not be visible
-
-
-  @javascript
-  Scenario: /^the "([^\"]*)" field should( not)? be visible$/ with Javascript
-    When I go to "/static_pages/visibility"
-    Then the "Visible field" field should be visible
-      But the "Hidden field" field should not be visible
-
-
-  Scenario: /^I should (not )?see (?:an|the) element "([^"]+)"$/
-    When I go to "/static_pages/see_element"
-    Then I should see an element ".panel"
-      And I should see the element ".panel"
-      And I should see the element ".panel--nested-contents" within ".panel"
-      And I should see the element ".panel--nested-contents" within a panel
-      But I should not see an element ".timeline"
-      But I should not see the element ".timeline"
-
-
-  Scenario: /^I should (not )?see (?:an|the) element for (.*?)$/
-    When I go to "/static_pages/see_element"
-    Then I should see an element for a panel
-      And I should see the element for a panel
-      And I should see the element for a panels nested contents within ".panel"
-      And I should see the element for a panels nested contents within a panel
-      And I should not see an element for the timeline
-      And I should not see the element for the timeline
-
-
-  Scenario: /^((?:|I )should see "([^"]*)" within (.*[^:])$/
-    When I go to "/static_pages/within"
-    Then I should see "Role" within ".table"
-      And I should see "Permissions" within a table
-    But I should not see "Nonsense" within ".table"
-      And I should not see "Nonsense" within a table
-
-
-  Scenario: /^(.*) within (.*[^:])$/ with a Capybara::Node::Element
-    When I go to "/static_pages/within"
-    Then I should see "All" within the table row containing "Admin"
-
-
-  Scenario: the /^(.*) within (.*[^:])$/ step should not be invoked when the word "within" is used in an argument for another step
-    When I go to "/static_pages/within"
-    Then I should see "He lives within a few miles of Augsburg"
-
-
-  Scenario: /^I perform basic authentication as "([^\"]*)\/([^\"]*)" and go to (.*)$/
-    When I go to "/authenticated/page"
-    Then I should see "Access denied"
-    When I perform basic authentication as "user/password" and go to "/authenticated/page"
-    Then I should see "Action reached"
-
-
-  @javascript
-  Scenario: /^I perform basic authentication as "([^\"]*)\/([^\"]*)" and go to (.*)$/ with Javascript
-    When I perform basic authentication as "user/password" and go to "/authenticated/page"
-    Then I should see "Action reached"