sisimai 4.25.17 → 5.0.0

data/lib/sisimai/smtp/status.rb

@@ -1,514 +1,455 @@
 # http://www.iana.org/assignments/smtp-enhanced-status-codes/smtp-enhanced-status-codes.xhtml
-#
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # [Class Sub-Codes]
 # 2.X.Y Success
 # 4.X.Y Persistent Transient Failure
 # 5.X.Y Permanent Failure
 #
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # [Subject Sub-Codes]
-#
 # X.0.X --- Other or Undefined Status
 #           There is no additional subject information available.
 #
 # X.1.X --- Addressing Status
-#           The address status reports on the originator or destination address.
-#           It may include address syntax or validity.
-#           These errors can generally be corrected by the sender and retried.
+#           The address status reports on the originator or destination address. It may include
+#           address syntax or validity. These errors can generally be corrected by the sender and
+#           retried.
 #
 # X.2.X --- Mailbox Status
-#           Mailbox status indicates that something having to do with the mailbox
-#           has caused this DSN. Mailbox issues are assumed to be under the general
-#           control of the recipient.
+#           Mailbox status indicates that something having to do with the mailbox has caused this
+#           DSN. Mailbox issues are assumed to be under the general control of the recipient.
 #
 # X.3.X --- Mail System Status
-#           Mail system status indicates that something having to do with the
-#           destination system has caused this DSN. System issues are assumed to
-#           be under the general control of the destination system administrator.
+#           Mail system status indicates that something having to do with the destination system
+#           has caused this DSN. System issues are assumed to be under the general control of the
+#           destination system administrator.
 #
 # X.4.X --- Network and Routing Status
-#           The networking or routing codes report status about the delivery
-#           system itself. These system components include any necessary
-#           infrastructure such as directory and routing services. Network issues
-#           are assumed to be under the control of the destination or intermediate
-#           system administrator.
+#           The networking or routing codes report status about the delivery system itself. These
+#           system components include any necessary infrastructure such as directory and routing
+#           services. Network issues are assumed to be under the control of the destination or
+#           intermediate system administrator.
 #
 # X.5.X --- Mail Delivery Protocol Status
-#           The mail delivery protocol status codes report failures involving
-#           the message delivery protocol. These failures include the full range
-#           of problems resulting from implementation errors or an unreliable
-#           connection.
+#           The mail delivery protocol status codes report failures involving the message delivery
+#           protocol. These failures include the full range of problems resulting from
+#           implementation errors or an unreliable connection.
 #
 # X.6.X --- Message Content or Media Status
-#           The message content or media status codes report failures involving
-#           the content of the message. These codes report failures due to
-#           translation, transcoding, or otherwise unsupported message media.
-#           Message content or media issues are under the control of both the
-#           sender and the receiver, both of which must support a common set of
-#           supported content-types.
+#           The message content or media status codes report failures involving the content of the
+#           message. These codes report failures due to translation, transcoding, or otherwise
+#           unsupported message media. Message content or media issues are under the control of both
+#           the sender and the receiver, both of which must support a common set of supported
+#           content-types.
 #
 # X.7.X --- Security or Policy Status
-#           The security or policy status codes report failures involving policies
-#           such as per-recipient or per-host filtering and cryptographic operations.
-#           Security and policy status issues are assumed to be under the control
-#           of either or both the sender and recipient.
-#           Both the sender and recipient must permit the exchange of messages
-#           and arrange the exchange of necessary keys and certificates for
-#           cryptographic operations.
-#
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# [Enumerated Status Codes]
+#           The security or policy status codes report failures involving policies such as
+#           per-recipient or per-host filtering and cryptographic operations. Security and policy
+#           status issues are assumed to be under the control of either or both the sender and
+#           recipient.  Both the sender and recipient must permit the exchange of messages and
+#           arrange the exchange of necessary keys and certificates for cryptographic operations.
 #
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# [Enumerated Status Codes]
 # X.0.0  Any    Other undefined Status:(RFC 3463)
-#                 Other undefined status is the only undefined error code. It
-#                 should be used for all errors for which only the class of the
-#                 error is known.
+#                 Other undefined status is the only undefined error code. It should be used for all
+#                 errors for which only the class of the error is known.
 #
 # X.1.0  ---    Other address status:(RFC 3463)
-#                 Something about the address specified in the message caused
-#                 this DSN.
+#                 Something about the address specified in the message caused this DSN.
 #
 # X.1.1  451    Bad destination mailbox address:(RFC3463)
-#        550      The mailbox specified in the address does not exist.
-#                 For Internet mail names, this means the address portion to the
-#                 the left of the "@" sign is invalid.
-#                 This code is only useful for permanent failures.
+#        550      The mailbox specified in the address does not exist. For Internet mail names, this
+#                 means the address portion to the the left of the "@" sign is invalid. This code is
+#                 only useful for permanent failures.
 #
 # X.1.2  ---    Bad destination system addres:
-#                 The destination system specified in the address does not exist
-#                 or is incapable of accepting mail. For Internet mail names,
-#                 this means the address portion to the right of the "@" is
-#                 invalid for mail.
-#                 This code is only useful for permanent failures.
+#                 The destination system specified in the address does not exist or is incapable of
+#                 accepting mail. For Internet mail names, this means the address portion to the
+#                 right of the "@" is invalid for mail. This code is only useful for permanent
+#                 failures.
 #
 # X.1.3  501    Bad destination mailbox address syntax:
-#                 The destination address was syntactically invalid. This can
-#                 apply to any field in the address. This code is only useful
-#                 for permanent failures.
+#                 The destination address was syntactically invalid. This can apply to any field in
+#                 the address. This code is only useful for permanent failures.
 #
 # X.1.4  ---    Destination mailbox address ambiguous:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The mailbox address as specified matches one or more recipients
-#                 on the destination system.
-#                 This may result if a heuristic address mapping algorithm is
-#                 used to map the specified address to a local mailbox name.
+#                 The mailbox address as specified matches one or more recipients on the destination
+#                 system. This may result if a heuristic address mapping algorithm is used to map
+#                 the specified address to a local mailbox name.
 #
 # X.1.5  250    Destination address valid:(RFC 3463)
-#                 This mailbox address as specified was valid. This status code
-#                 should be used for positive delivery reports.
+#                 This mailbox address as specified was valid. This status code should be used for
+#                 positive delivery reports.
 #
 # X.1.6  ---    Destination mailbox has moved, No forwarding address:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The mailbox address provided was at one time valid, but mail
-#                 is no longer being accepted for that address.
-#                 This code is only useful for permanent failures.
+#                 The mailbox address provided was at one time valid, but mail is no longer being
+#                 accepted for that address. This code is only useful for permanent failures.
 #
 # X.1.7  ---    Bad sender's mailbox address syntax:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The sender's address was syntactically invalid. This can apply
-#                 to any field in the address.
+#                 The sender's address was syntactically invalid. This can apply to any field in
+#                 the address.
 #
 # X.1.8  451    Bad sender's system address:(RFC 3463)
-#        501      The sender's system specified in the address does not exist or
-#                 is incapable of accepting return mail. For domain names, this
-#                 means the address portion to the right of the "@" is invalid
-#                 for mail.
+#        501      The sender's system specified in the address does not exist or is incapable of
+#                 accepting return mail. For domain names, this means the address portion to the
+#                 right of the "@" is invalid for mail.
 #
 # X.1.9  ---    Message relayed to non-compliant mailer:(RFC 5248, 3886)
-#                 The mailbox address specified was valid, but the message has
-#                 been relayed to a system that does not speak this protocol;
-#                 no further information can be provided.
+#                 The mailbox address specified was valid, but the message has been relayed to a
+#                 system that does not speak this protocol; no further information can be provided.
 #
 # X.1.10 ---    Recipient address has null MX:(RFC 7505)
-#                 This status code is returned when the associated address is
-#                 marked as invalid using a null MX.
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#                 This status code is returned when the associated address is marked as invalid
+#                 using a null MX.
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # X.2.0  ---    Other or undefined mailbox status:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The mailbox exists, but something about the destination mailbox
-#                 has caused the sending of this DSN.
+#                 The mailbox exists, but something about the destination mailbox has caused the
+#                 sending of this DSN.
 #
 # X.2.1  ---    Mailbox disabled, not accepting messages:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The mailbox exists, but is not accepting messages. This may be
-#                 a permanent error if the mailbox will never be re-enabled or a
-#                 transient error if the mailbox is only temporarily disabled.
+#                 The mailbox exists, but is not accepting messages. This may be a permanent error
+#                 if the mailbox will never be re-enabled or a transient error if the mailbox is
+#                 only temporarily disabled.
 #
 # X.2.2  552    Mailbox full:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The mailbox is full because the user has exceeded a per-mailbox
-#                 administrative quota or physical capacity. The general semantics
-#                 implies that the recipient can delete messages to make more
-#                 space available.
-#                 This code should be used as a persistent transient failure.
+#                 The mailbox is full because the user has exceeded a per-mailbox administrative
+#                 quota or physical capacity. The general semantics implies that the recipient can
+#                 delete messages to make more space available. This code should be used as a
+#                 persistent transient failure.
 #
 # X.2.3  552    Message length exceeds administrative limit:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A per-mailbox administrative message length limit has been
-#                 exceeded. This status code should be used when the per-mailbox
-#                 message length limit is less than the general system limit.
-#                 This code should be used as a permanent failure.
+#                 A per-mailbox administrative message length limit has been exceeded. This status
+#                 code should be used when the per-mailbox message length limit is less than the
+#                 general system limit. This code should be used as a permanent failure.
 #
 # X.2.4  450    Mailing list expansion problem:(RFC 3463)
-#        452      The mailbox is a mailing list address and the mailing list was
-#                 unable to be expanded. This code may represent a permanent
-#                 failure or a persistent transient failure.
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#        452      The mailbox is a mailing list address and the mailing list was unable to be
+#                 expanded. This code may represent a permanent failure or a persistent transient
+#                 failure.
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # X.3.0  221    Other or undefined mail system status:(RFC 3463)
-#        250      The destination system exists and normally accepts mail, but
-#        421,451  something about the system has caused the generation of this
-#        550,554  DSN.
+#        250      The destination system exists and normally accepts mail, but something about the
+#        421,451  system has caused the generation of this DSN.
+#        550,554
 #
 # X.3.1  452    Mail system full:(RFC 3463)
-#                 Mail system storage has been exceeded. The general semantics
-#                 imply that the individual recipient may not be able to delete
-#                 material to make room for additional messages. This is useful
-#                 only as a persistent transient error.
+#                 Mail system storage has been exceeded. The general semantics imply that the
+#                 individual recipient may not be able to delete material to make room for
+#                 additional messages. This is useful only as a persistent transient error.
 #
 # X.3.2  453    System not accepting network messages:(RFC 3463)
-#        521      The host on which the mailbox is resident is not accepting messages.
-#                 Examples of such conditions include an imminent shutdown, excessive
-#                 load, or system maintenance. This is useful for both permanent
-#                 and persistent transient errors.
+#        521      The host on which the mailbox is resident is not accepting messages. Examples of
+#                 such conditions include an imminent shutdown, excessive load, or system
+#                 maintenance. This is useful for both permanent and persistent transient errors.
 #
 # X.3.3  ---    System not capable of selected features:(RFC 3463)
-#                 Selected features specified for the message are not supported
-#                 by the destination system. This can occur in gateways when
-#                 features from one domain cannot be mapped onto the supported
-#                 feature in another.
+#                 Selected features specified for the message are not supported by the destination
+#                 system. This can occur in gateways when features from one domain cannot be mapped
+#                 onto the supported feature in another.
 #
 # X.3.4  552    Message too big for system:(RFC 3463)
-#        554      The message is larger than per-message size limit. This limit
-#                 may either be for physical or administrative reasons. This is
-#                 useful only as a permanent error.
+#        554      The message is larger than per-message size limit. This limit may either be for
+#                 physical or administrative reasons. This is useful only as a permanent error.
 #
 # X.3.5  ---    System incorrectly configured:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The system is not configured in a manner that will permit it
-#                 to accept this message.
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#                 The system is not configured in a manner that will permit it to accept this
+#                 message.
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # X.4.0  ---    Other or undefined network or routing status:(RFC 3463)
-#                 Something went wrong with the networking, but it is not clear
-#                 what the problem is, or the problem cannot be well expressed
-#                 with any of the other provided detail codes.
+#                 Something went wrong with the networking, but it is not clear what the problem is,
+#                 or the problem cannot be well expressed with any of the other provided detail
+#                 codes.
 #
 # X.4.1  451    No answer from host:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The outbound connection attempt was not answered, because either
-#                 the remote system was busy, or was unable to take a call.
-#                 This is useful only as a persistent transient error.
+#                 The outbound connection attempt was not answered, because either the remote system
+#                 was busy, or was unable to take a call. This is useful only as a persistent
+#                 transient error.
 #
 # X.4.2  421    Bad connection:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The outbound connection was established, but was unable to
-#                 complete the message transaction, either because of time-out,
-#                 or inadequate connection quality. This is useful only as a
-#                 persistent transient error.
+#                 The outbound connection was established, but was unable to complete the message
+#                 transaction, either because of time-out, or inadequate connection quality. This
+#                 is useful only as a persistent transient error.
 #
 # X.4.3  451    Directory server failure:(RFC 3463)
-#        550      The network system was unable to forward the message, because
-#                 a directory server was unavailable. This is useful only as a
-#                 persistent transient error. The inability to connect to an
-#                 Internet DNS server is one example of the directory server
-#                 failure error.
+#        550      The network system was unable to forward the message, because a directory server
+#                 was unavailable. This is useful only as a persistent transient error. The
+#                 inability to connect to an Internet DNS server is one example of the directory
+#                 server failure error.
 #
 # X.4.4  ---    Unable to route:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The mail system was unable to determine the next hop for the
-#                 message because the necessary routing information was unavailable
-#                 from the directory server. This is useful for both permanent
-#                 and persistent transient errors. A DNS lookup returning only
-#                 an SOA (Start of Administration) record for a domain name is
-#                 one example of the unable to route error.
+#                 The mail system was unable to determine the next hop for the message because the
+#                 necessary routing information was unavailable from the directory server. This is
+#                 useful for both permanent and persistent transient errors. A DNS lookup returning
+#                 only an SOA (Start of Administration) record for a domain name is one example of
+#                 the unable to route error.
 #
 # X.4.5  451    Mail system congestion:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The mail system was unable to deliver the message because the
-#                 mail system was congested. This is useful only as a persistent
-#                 transient error.
+#                 The mail system was unable to deliver the message because the mail system was
+#                 congested. This is useful only as a persistent transient error.
 #
 # X.4.6  ---    Routing loop detected:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A routing loop caused the message to be forwarded too many times,
-#                 either because of incorrect routing tables or a user-forwarding
-#                 loop. This is useful only as a persistent transient error.
+#                 A routing loop caused the message to be forwarded too many times, either because
+#                 of incorrect routing tables or a user-forwarding loop. This is useful only as a
+#                 persistent transient error.
 #
 # X.4.7  ---    Delivery time expired:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The message was considered too old by the rejecting system,
-#                 either because it remained on that host too long or because
-#                 the time-to-live value specified by the sender of the message
-#                 was exceeded. If possible, the code for the actual problem
-#                 found when delivery was attempted should be returned rather
-#                 than this code.
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#                 The message was considered too old by the rejecting system, either because it
+#                 remained on that host too long or because the time-to-live value specified by the
+#                 sender of the message was exceeded. If possible, the code for the actual problem
+#                 found when delivery was attempted should be returned rather than this code.
+
+# X.4.8  421    Retry on IPv4
+#        451      the mail system will not accept this message over IPv6 because it lacks some re-
+#        456      quirments described in the full text of the rejection, however the sending mail
+#                 system can retry immediately to submit the message over IPv4 only.
+#                 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-martin-smtp-ipv6-to-ipv4-fallback-00
+#
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # X.5.0  220    Other or undefined protocol status:(RFC 3463)
-#        250-253  Something was wrong with the protocol necessary to deliver the
-#        451,452  message to the next hop and the problem cannot be well expressed
-#        454,458  with any of the other provided detail codes.
+#        250-253  Something was wrong with the protocol necessary to deliver the message to the next
+#        451,452  hop and the problem cannot be well expressed with any of the other provided detail
+#        454,458  codes.
 #        459,554
 #        501-503
 #
 # X.5.1  430    Invalid command:(RFC 3463)
-#        500,501  A mail transaction protocol command was issued which was either
-#        503,530  out of sequence or unsupported.
-#        550,554  This is useful only as a permanent error.
+#        500,501  A mail transaction protocol command was issued which was either out of sequence
+#        503,530  or unsupported. This is useful only as a permanent error.
+#        550,554  
 #        555
 #
 # X.5.2  500    Syntax error:(RFC 3463)
-#        500,501  A mail transaction protocol command was issued which could not
-#        502,550  be interpreted, either because the syntax was wrong or the
-#        555      command is unrecognized.
-#                 This is useful only as a permanent error.
+#        500,501  A mail transaction protocol command was issued which could not be interpreted,
+#        502,550  either because the syntax was wrong or the command is unrecognized. This is useful
+#        555      only as a permanent error.
 #
 # X.5.3  451    Too many recipients:(RFC 3463)
-#                 More recipients were specified for the message than could have
-#                 been delivered by the protocol. This error should normally result
-#                 in the segmentation of the message into two, the remainder of
-#                 the recipients to be delivered on a subsequent delivery attempt.
-#                 It is included in this list in the event that such segmentation
-#                 is not possible.
+#                 More recipients were specified for the message than could have been delivered by
+#                 the protocol. This error should normally result in the segmentation of the message
+#                 into two, the remainder of the recipients to be delivered on a subsequent delivery
+#                 attempt. It is included in this list in the event that such segmentation is not
+#                 possible.
 #
 # X.5.4  451    Invalid command arguments:(RFC 3463)
-#        501-504  A valid mail transaction protocol command was issued with
-#        550      invalid arguments, either because the arguments were out of
-#        555      range or represented unrecognized features.
-#                 This is useful only as a permanent error.
+#        501-504  A valid mail transaction protocol command was issued with invalid arguments,
+#        550      either because the arguments were out of range or represented unrecognized
+#        555      features. This is useful only as a permanent error.
 #
 # X.5.5  ---    Wrong protocol version:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A protocol version mis-match existed which could not be
-#                 automatically resolved by the communicating parties.
+#                 A protocol version mis-match existed which could not be automatically resolved by
+#                 the communicating parties.
 #
 # X.5.6  550    Authentication Exchange line is too long (RFC 4954)
-#                 This enhanced status code SHOULD be returned when the server
-#                 fails the AUTH command due to the client sending a [BASE64]
-#                 response which is longer than the maximum buffer size available
-#                 for the currently selected SASL mechanism. This is useful for
-#                 both permanent and persistent transient errors.
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#                 This enhanced status code SHOULD be returned when the server fails the AUTH
+#                 command due to the client sending a [BASE64] response which is longer than the
+#                 maximum buffer size available for the currently selected SASL mechanism. This is
+#                 useful for both permanent and persistent transient errors.
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # X.6.0  ---    Other or undefined media error:(RFC 3463)
-#                 Something about the content of a message caused it to be considered
-#                 undeliverable and the problem cannot be well expressed with
-#                 any of the other provided detail codes.
+#                 Something about the content of a message caused it to be considered undeliverable
+#                 and the problem cannot be well expressed with any of the other provided detail
+#                 codes.
 #
 # X.6.1  ---    Media not supported:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The media of the message is not supported by either the delivery
-#                 protocol or the next system in the forwarding path. This is
-#                 useful only as a permanent error.
+#                 The media of the message is not supported by either the delivery protocol or the
+#                 next system in the forwarding path. This is useful only as a permanent error.
 #
 # X.6.2  ---    Conversion required and prohibited:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The content of the message must be converted before it can be
-#                 delivered and such conversion is not permitted. Such prohibitions
-#                 may be the expression of the sender in the message itself or
-#                 the policy of the sending host.
+#                 The content of the message must be converted before it can be delivered and such
+#                 conversion is not permitted. Such prohibitions may be the expression of the sender
+#                 in the message itself or the policy of the sending host.
 #
 # X.6.3  554    Conversion required but not supported:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The message content must be converted in order to be forwarded
-#                 but such conversion is not possible or is not practical by a
-#                 host in the forwarding path. This condition may result when
-#                 an ESMTP gateway supports 8bit transport but is not able to
-#                 downgrade the message to 7 bit as required for the next hop.
+#                 The message content must be converted in order to be forwarded but such conversion
+#                 is not possible or is not practical by a host in the forwarding path. This
+#                 condition may result when an ESMTP gateway supports 8bit transport but is not able
+#                 to downgrade the message to 7 bit as required for the next hop.
 #
 # X.6.4  250    Conversion with loss performed:(RFC 3463)
-#                 This is a warning sent to the sender when message delivery was
-#                 successfully but when the delivery required a conversion in
-#                 which some data was lost. This may also be a permanent error
-#                 if the sender has indicated that conversion with loss is
+#                 This is a warning sent to the sender when message delivery was successfully but
+#                 when the delivery required a conversion in which some data was lost. This may also
+#                 be a permanent error if the sender has indicated that conversion with loss is
 #                 prohibited for the message.
 #
 # X.6.5  ---    Conversion Failed:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A conversion was required but was unsuccessful. This may be
-#                 useful as a permanent or persistent temporary notification.
+#                 A conversion was required but was unsuccessful. This may be useful as a permanent
+#                 or persistent temporary notification.
 #
 # X.6.6  554    Message content not available (RFC 4468)
-#                 The message content could not be fetched from a remote system.
-#                 This may be useful as a permanent or persistent temporary
-#                 notification.
+#                 The message content could not be fetched from a remote system. This may be useful
+#                 as a permanent or persistent temporary notification.
 #
 # X.6.7  553    The ALT-ADDRESS is required but not specified:(RFC 6531)
-#        550      This indicates the reception of a MAIL or RCPT command that
-#                 non-ASCII addresses are not permitted
+#        550      This indicates the reception of a MAIL or RCPT command that non-ASCII addresses
+#                 are not permitted
 #
 # X.6.8  252    UTF-8 string reply is required, but not permitted by the client:(RFC 6531)
-#        553      This indicates that a reply containing a UTF-8 string is required
-#        550      to show the mailbox name, but that form of response is not permitted
-#                 by the SMTP client.
+#        553      This indicates that a reply containing a UTF-8 string is required to show the
+#        550      mailbox name, but that form of response is not permitted by the SMTP client.
 #
 # X.6.9  550    UTF8SMTP downgrade failed:(RFC 6531)
-#                 This indicates that transaction failed after the final "." of
-#                 the DATA command.
+#                 This indicates that transaction failed after the final "." of the DATA command.
 #
 # X.6.10        This is a duplicate of X.6.8 and is thus deprecated.
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # X.7.0  220    Other or undefined security status:(RFC 3463)
-#        235      Something related to security caused the message to be returned,
-#        450,454  and the problem cannot be well expressed with any of the other
-#        500,501  provided detail codes. This status code may also be used when
-#        503,504  the condition cannot be further described because of security
-#        530,535  policies in force.
+#        235      Something related to security caused the message to be returned, and the problem
+#        450,454  cannot be well expressed with any of the other provided detail codes. This status
+#        500,501  code may also be used when the condition cannot be further described because of
+#        503,504  security policies in force.
+#        530,535
 #        550
 #
 # X.7.1  451    Delivery not authorized, message refused:(RFC 3463)
-#        454,502  The sender is not authorized to send to the destination. This
-#        503,533  can be the result of per-host or per-recipient filtering. This
-#        550,551  memo does not discuss the merits of any such filtering, but
-#                 provides a mechanism to report such. This is useful only as
-#                 a permanent error.
+#        454,502  The sender is not authorized to send to the destination. This can be the result
+#        503,533  of per-host or per-recipient filtering. This memo does not discuss the merits of
+#        550,551  any such filtering, but provides a mechanism to report such. This is useful only
+#                 as a permanent error.
 #
 # X.7.2  550    Mailing list expansion prohibited:(RFC 3463)
-#                 The sender is not authorized to send a message to the intended
-#                 mailing list. This is useful only as a permanent error.
+#                 The sender is not authorized to send a message to the intended mailing list. This
+#                 is useful only as a permanent error.
 #
 # X.7.3  ---    Security conversion required but not possible:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A conversion from one secure messaging protocol to another was
-#                 required for delivery and such conversion was not possible.
-#                 This is useful only as a permanent error.
+#                 A conversion from one secure messaging protocol to another was required for
+#                 delivery and such conversion was not possible. This is useful only as a permanent
+#                 error.
 #
 # X.7.4  504    Security features not supported:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A message contained security features such as secure authentication
-#                 that could not be supported on the delivery protocol. This is
-#                 useful only as a permanent error.
+#                 A message contained security features such as secure authentication that could not
+#                 be supported on the delivery protocol. This is useful only as a permanent error.
 #
 # X.7.5  ---    Cryptographic failure:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A transport system otherwise authorized to validate or decrypt
-#                 a message in transport was unable to do so because necessary
-#                 information such as key was not available or such information
-#                 was invalid.
+#                 A transport system otherwise authorized to validate or decrypt a message in
+#                 transport was unable to do so because necessary information such as key was not
+#                 available or such information was invalid.
 #
 # X.7.6  ---    Cryptographic algorithm not supported:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A transport system otherwise authorized to validate or decrypt
-#                 a message was unable to do so because the necessary algorithm
-#                 was not supported.
+#                 A transport system otherwise authorized to validate or decrypt a message was
+#                 unable to do so because the necessary algorithm was not supported.
 
 # X.7.7  ---    Message integrity failure:(RFC 3463)
-#                 A transport system otherwise authorized to validate a message
-#                 was unable to do so because the message was corrupted or altered.
-#                 This may be useful as a permanent, transient persistent, or
-#                 successful delivery code.
+#                 A transport system otherwise authorized to validate a message was unable to do so
+#                 because the message was corrupted or altered. This may be useful as a permanent,
+#                 transient persistent, or successful delivery code.
 #
 # X.7.8  535    Trust relationship required:(RFC 4954)
-#        554      This response to the AUTH command indicates that the authentication
-#                 failed due to invalid or insufficient authentication credentials.
-#                 In this case, the client SHOULD ask the user to supply new credentials
-#                 (such as by presenting a password dialog box).
+#        554      This response to the AUTH command indicates that the authentication failed due to
+#                 invalid or insufficient authentication credentials. In this case, the client
+#                 SHOULD ask the user to supply new credentials (such as by presenting a password
+#                 dialog box).
 #
 # X.7.9  534    Authentication mechanism is too weak:(RFC 4954)
-#                 This response to the AUTH command indicates that the selected
-#                 authentication mechanism is weaker than server policy permits
-#                 for that user. The client SHOULD retry with a new authentication
-#                 mechanism.
+#                 This response to the AUTH command indicates that the selected authentication
+#                 mechanism is weaker than server policy permits for that user. The client SHOULD
+#                 retry with a new authentication mechanism.
 #
 # X.7.10 523    Encryption Needed:(RFC 5248)
-#                 This indicates that external strong privacy layer is needed in
-#                 order to use the requested authentication mechanism. This is
-#                 primarily intended for use with clear text authentication mechanisms.
-#                 A client which receives this may activate a security layer such
-#                 as TLS prior to authenticating, or attempt to use a stronger
+#                 This indicates that external strong privacy layer is needed in order to use the
+#                 requested authentication mechanism. This is primarily intended for use with clear
+#                 text authentication mechanisms. A client which receives this may activate a
+#                 security layer such as TLS prior to authenticating, or attempt to use a stronger
 #                 mechanism.
 #
 # X.7.11 524    Encryption required for requested authentication mechanism:(RFC 4954)
-#        538      This response to the AUTH command indicates that the selected
-#                 authentication mechanism may only be used when the underlying
-#                 SMTP connection is encrypted. Note that this response code is
-#                 documented here for historical purposes only. Modern implementations
-#                 SHOULD NOT advertise mechanisms that are not permitted due to
-#                 lack of encryption, unless an encryption layer of sufficient
-#                 strength is currently being employed.
+#        538      This response to the AUTH command indicates that the selected authentication
+#                 mechanism may only be used when the underlying SMTP connection is encrypted. Note
+#                 that this response code is documented here for historical purposes only. Modern
+#                 implementations SHOULD NOT advertise mechanisms that are not permitted due to lack
+#                 of encryption, unless an encryption layer of sufficient strength is currently
+#                 being employed.
 #
 # X.7.12 422    A password transition is needed:(RFC 4954)
-#        432      This response to the AUTH command indicates that the user needs
-#                 to transition to the selected authentication mechanism. This
-#                 is typically done by authenticating once using the [PLAIN]
-#                 authentication mechanism. The selected mechanism SHOULD then
-#                 work for authentications in subsequent sessions.
+#        432      This response to the AUTH command indicates that the user needs to transition to
+#                 the selected authentication mechanism. This is typically done by authenticating
+#                 once using the [PLAIN] authentication mechanism. The selected mechanism SHOULD
+#                 then work for authentications in subsequent sessions.
 #
 # X.7.13 525    User Account Disabled:(RFC 5248)
-#                 Sometimes a system administrator will have to disable a user's
-#                 account (e.g., due to lack of payment, abuse, evidence of a
-#                 break-in attempt, etc).
-#                 This error code occurs after a successful authentication to a
-#                 disabled account. This informs the client that the failure is
-#                 permanent until the user contacts their system administrator
-#                 to get the account re-enabled.
-#                 It differs from a generic authentication failure where the
-#                 client's best option is to present the passphrase entry dialog
-#                 in case the user simply mistyped their passphrase.
+#                 Sometimes a system administrator will have to disable a user's account (e.g., due
+#                 to lack of payment, abuse, evidence of a break-in attempt, etc). This error code
+#                 occurs after a successful authentication to a disabled account. This informs the
+#                 client that the failure is permanent until the user contacts their system
+#                 administrator to get the account re-enabled. It differs from a generic
+#                 authentication failure where the client's best option is to present the passphrase
+#                 entry dialog in case the user simply mistyped their passphrase.
 #
 # X.7.14 535    Trust relationship required:(RFC 5248)
-#        554      The submission server requires a configured trust relationship
-#                 with a third-party server in order to access the message content.
-#                 This value replaces the prior use of X.7.8 for this error condition.
-#                 thereby updating [RFC4468].
+#        554      The submission server requires a configured trust relationship with a third-party
+#                 server in order to access the message content. This value replaces the prior use
+#                 of X.7.8 for this error condition. thereby updating [RFC4468].
 #
 # X.7.15 450    Priority Level is too low:(RFC6710)
-#        550      The specified priority level is below the lowest priority acceptable
-#        4xx      for the receiving SMTP server. This condition might be temporary,
-#        5xx      for example the server is operating in a mode where only higher
-#                 priority messages are accepted for transfer and delivery, while
-#                 lower priority messages are rejected.
+#        550      The specified priority level is below the lowest priority acceptable for the
+#        4xx      receiving SMTP server. This condition might be temporary, for example the server
+#        5xx      is operating in a mode where only higher priority messages are accepted for
+#                 transfer and delivery, while lower priority messages are rejected.
 #
 # X.7.16 552    Message is too big for the specified priority:(RFC 6710)
-#        4xx      The message is too big for the specified priority.
-#        5xx      This condition might be temporary, for example the server is
-#                 operating in a mode where only higher priority messages below
-#                 certain size are accepted for transfer and delivery.
+#        4xx      The message is too big for the specified priority. This condition might be
+#        5xx      temporary, for example the server is operating in a mode where only higher
+#                 priority messages below certain size are accepted for transfer and delivery.
 #
 # X.7.17 5xx    Mailbox owner has changed:(RFC 6710)
-#                 This status code is returned when a message is received with
-#                 a Require-Recipient-Valid-Since field or RRVS extension and
-#                 the receiving system is able to determine that the intended
-#                 recipient mailbox has not been under continuous ownership since
-#                 the specified date-time.
+#                 This status code is returned when a message is received with a
+#                 Require-Recipient-Valid-Since field or RRVS extension and the receiving system is
+#                 able to determine that the intended recipient mailbox has not been under
+#                 continuous ownership since the specified date-time.
 #
 # X.7.18 5xx    Domain owner has changed:(RFC 7293)
-#                 This status code is returned when a message is received with
-#                 a Require-Recipient-Valid-Since field or RRVS extension and
-#                 the receiving system wishes to disclose that the owner of the
-#                 domain name of the recipient has changed since the specified
-#                 date-time.
+#                 This status code is returned when a message is received with a
+#                 Require-Recipient-Valid-Since field or RRVS extension and the receiving system
+#                 wishes to disclose that the owner of the domain name of the recipient has changed
+#                 since the specified date-time.
 #
 # X.7.19 5xx    RRVS test cannot be completed:(RFC 7293)
-#                 This status code is returned when a message is received with
-#                 a Require-Recipient-Valid-Since field or RRVS extension and
-#                 the receiving system cannot complete the requested evaluation
-#                 because the required timestamp was not recorded.
-#                 The message originator needs to decide whether to reissue the
-#                 message without RRVS protection.
+#                 This status code is returned when a message is received with a
+#                 Require-Recipient-Valid-Since field or RRVS extension and the receiving system
+#                 cannot complete the requested evaluation because the required timestamp was not
+#                 recorded. The message originator needs to decide whether to reissue the message
+#                 without RRVS protection.
 #
 # X.7.20 550    No passing DKIM signature found:(RFC 7372)
-#                 This status code is returned when a message did not contain
-#                 any passing DKIM signatures. (This violates the advice of
-#                 Section 6.1 of [RFC6376].)
+#                 This status code is returned when a message did not contain any passing DKIM
+#                 signatures. (This violates the advice of Section 6.1 of [RFC6376].)
 #
 # X.7.21 550    No acceptable DKIM signature found:(RFC 7372, 6476)
-#                 This status code is returned when a message contains one or
-#                 more passing DKIM signatures, but none are acceptable.
-#                 (This violates the advice of Section 6.1 of [RFC6376].)
+#                 This status code is returned when a message contains one or more passing DKIM
+#                 signatures, but none are acceptable. (This violates the advice of Section 6.1 of
+#                 [RFC6376].)
 #
 # X.7.22 550    No valid author-matched DKIM signature found:(RFC 7372)
-#                 This status code is returned when a message contains one or
-#                 more passing DKIM signatures, but none are acceptable because
-#                 none have an identifier(s) that matches the author address(es)
-#                 found in the From header field.
-#                 This is a special case of X.7.21. (This violates the advice of
-#                 Section 6.1 of [RFC6376].)
+#                 This status code is returned when a message contains one or more passing DKIM
+#                 signatures, but none are acceptable because none have an identifier(s) that
+#                 matches the author address(es) found in the From header field. This is a special
+#                 case of X.7.21. (This violates the advice of Section 6.1 of [RFC6376].)
 #
 # X.7.23 550    SPF validation failed:(RFC 7273, 7208)
-#                 This status code is returned when a message completed an SPF
-#                 check that produced a "fail" result, contrary to local policy
-#                 requirements. Used in place of 5.7.1 as described in Section
-#                 8.4 of [RFC7208].
+#                 This status code is returned when a message completed an SPF check that produced
+#                 a "fail" result, contrary to local policy requirements. Used in place of 5.7.1 as
+#                 described in Section 8.4 of [RFC7208].
 #
 # X.7.24 451    SPF validation error:(RFC 7372, 7208)
-#        550      This status code is returned when evaluation of SPF relative
-#                 to an arriving message resulted in an error. Used in place of
-#                 4.4.3 or 5.5.2 as described in Sections 8.6 and 8.7 of [RFC7208].
+#        550      This status code is returned when evaluation of SPF relative to an arriving
+#                 message resulted in an error. Used in place of 4.4.3 or 5.5.2 as described in
+#                 Sections 8.6 and 8.7 of [RFC7208].
 #
 # X.7.25 550    Reverse DNS validation failed:(RFC 7372, 7601)
-#                 This status code is returned when an SMTP client's IP address
-#                 failed a reverse DNS validation check, contrary to local policy
-#                 requirements.
+#                 This status code is returned when an SMTP client's IP address failed a reverse
+#                 DNS validation check, contrary to local policy requirements.
 #
 # X.7.26 550    Multiple authentication checks failed:(RFC 7372)
-#                 This status code is returned when a message failed more than
-#                 one message authentication check, contrary to local policy
-#                 requirements. The particular mechanisms that failed are not
-#                 specified.
+#                 This status code is returned when a message failed more than one message
+#                 authentication check, contrary to local policy requirements. The particular
+#                 mechanisms that failed are not specified.
 #
 # X.7.27 550    Sender address has null MX:(RFC 7505)
-#                 This status code is returned when the associated sender address
-#                 has a null MX, and the SMTP receiver is configured to reject
-#                 mail from such sender (e.g., because it could not return a DSN).
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#                 This status code is returned when the associated sender address has a null MX,
+#                 and the SMTP receiver is configured to reject mail from such sender
+#                 (e.g., because it could not return a DSN).
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # SAMPLES
-#
 #   554 5.5.0   No recipients have been specified
 #   503 5.5.0   Valid RCPT TO required before BURL
 #   554 5.6.3   Conversion required but not supported
@@ -531,14 +472,12 @@
 #       5.7.8   Authentication credentials invalid
 #       5.7.9   Authentication mechanism is too weak
 #       5.7.11  Encryption required for requested authentication mechanism
-# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 module Sisimai
   module SMTP
-    # Sisimai::RFC3463 is utilities for getting D.S.N. value from error reason text,
-    # getting the reason from D.S.N. value, and getting D.S.N. from the text including
-    # D.S.N.
+    # Sisimai::RFC3463 is utilities for getting D.S.N. value from error reason text, getting the
+    # reason from D.S.N. value, and getting D.S.N. from the text including D.S.N.
     module Status
-      # Imported from p5-Sisimail/lib/Sisimai/SMTP/Status.pm
       class << self
         CodePatterns = [
           %r/[ ]?[(][#]([45][.]\d[.]\d+)[)]?[ ]?/,  # #5.5.1
@@ -548,7 +487,7 @@ module Sisimai
         ]
         StandardCode = {
           '2.1.5'  => 'delivered',      # Successfully delivered
-          # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+          # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           '4.1.6'  => 'hasmoved',       # Destination mailbox has moved, No forwarding address
           '4.1.7'  => 'rejected',       # Bad sender's mailbox address syntax
           '4.1.8'  => 'rejected',       # Bad sender's system address
@@ -565,12 +504,13 @@ module Sisimai
           # '4.4.0' => 'networkerror',   # Other or undefined network or routing status
           '4.4.1'  => 'expired',        # No answer from host
           '4.4.2'  => 'networkerror',   # Bad connection
-          # '4.4.3' => 'systemerror',    # Directory server failure
+          '4.4.3'  => 'systemerror',    # Directory server failure
           '4.4.4'  => 'networkerror',   # Unable to route
           '4.4.5'  => 'systemfull',     # Mail system congestion
           '4.4.6'  => 'networkerror',   # Routing loop detected
           '4.4.7'  => 'expired',        # Delivery time expired
-          # '4.5.0' => 'networkerror',   # Other or undefined protocol status
+          '4.4.8'  => 'networkerror',   # Retry on IPv4
+#         '4.5.0'  => 'networkerror',   # Other or undefined protocol status
           '4.5.3'  => 'systemerror',    # Too many recipients
           '4.5.5'  => 'systemerror',    # Wrong protocol version
           '4.6.0'  => 'contenterror',   # Other or undefined media error
@@ -585,9 +525,9 @@ module Sisimai
           '4.7.12' => 'securityerror',  # A password transition is needed
           '4.7.15' => 'securityerror',  # Priority Level is too low
           '4.7.16' => 'mesgtoobig',     # Message is too big for the specified priority
-          '4.7.24' => 'securityerror',  # SPF validation error
-          '4.7.25' => 'blocked',        # Reverse DNS validation failed
-          # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+          '4.7.24' => 'authfailure ',   # SPF validation error
+          '4.7.25' => 'requireptr',     # Reverse DNS validation failed
+          # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           '5.1.0'  => 'userunknown',    # Other address status
           '5.1.1'  => 'userunknown',    # Bad destination mailbox address
           '5.1.2'  => 'hostunknown',    # Bad destination system address
@@ -612,10 +552,11 @@ module Sisimai
           '5.4.0'  => 'networkerror',   # Other or undefined network or routing status
           '5.4.3'  => 'systemerror',    # Directory server failure
           '5.4.4'  => 'hostunknown',    # Unable to route
+          '5.5.2'  => 'syntaxerror',    # If the server cannot BASE64 decode any client response (AUTH)
           '5.5.3'  => 'toomanyconn',    # Too many recipients
           '5.5.4'  => 'systemerror',    # Invalid command arguments
           '5.5.5'  => 'systemerror',    # Wrong protocol version
-          '5.5.6'  => 'securityerror',  # Authentication Exchange line is too long
+          '5.5.6'  => 'syntaxerror',    # Authentication Exchange line is too long
           '5.6.0'  => 'contenterror',   # Other or undefined media error
           '5.6.1'  => 'contenterror',   # Media not supported
           '5.6.2'  => 'contenterror',   # Conversion required and prohibited
@@ -644,43 +585,50 @@ module Sisimai
           '5.7.17' => 'hasmoved',       # Mailbox owner has changed
           '5.7.18' => 'hasmoved',       # Domain owner has changed
           '5.7.19' => 'securityerror',  # RRVS test cannot be completed
-          '5.7.20' => 'securityerror',  # No passing DKIM signature found
-          '5.7.21' => 'securityerror',  # No acceptable DKIM signature found
-          '5.7.22' => 'securityerror',  # No valid author-matched DKIM signature found
-          '5.7.23' => 'securityerror',  # SPF validation failed
-          '5.7.24' => 'securityerror',  # SPF validation error
-          '5.7.25' => 'blocked',        # Reverse DNS validation failed
-          '5.7.26' => 'securityerror',  # Multiple authentication checks failed
+          '5.7.20' => 'authfailure',    # No passing DKIM signature found
+          '5.7.21' => 'authfailure',    # No acceptable DKIM signature found
+          '5.7.22' => 'authfailure',    # No valid author-matched DKIM signature found
+          '5.7.23' => 'authfailure',    # SPF validation failed
+          '5.7.24' => 'authfailure',    # SPF validation error
+          '5.7.25' => 'requireptr',     # Reverse DNS validation failed
+          '5.7.26' => 'authfailure',    # Multiple authentication checks failed
           '5.7.27' => 'notaccept',      # MX resource record of a destination host is Null MX: RFC7505
         }.freeze
 
         InternalCode = {
           :temporary => {
-            'blocked'       => '4.0.971',
-            'contenterror'  => '4.0.960',
-            # 'exceedlimit' => '4.0.923',
-            'expired'       => '4.0.947',
-            'filtered'      => '4.0.924',
-            # 'hasmoved'    => '4.0.916',
-            # 'hostunknown' => '4.0.912',
-            'mailboxfull'   => '4.0.922',
-            # 'mailererror' => '4.0.939',
-            # 'mesgtoobig'  => '4.0.934',
-            'networkerror'  => '4.0.944',
-            # 'norelaying'  => '4.0.909',
-            'notaccept'     => '4.0.932',
-            'onhold'        => '4.0.901',
-            'rejected'      => '4.0.918',
-            'securityerror' => '4.0.970',
-            'spamdetected'  => '4.0.980',
-            # 'suspend'     => '4.0.921',
-            'systemerror'   => '4.0.930',
-            'systemfull'    => '4.0.931',
-            'toomanyconn'   => '4.0.945',
-            # 'userunknown' => '4.0.911',
-            'undefined'     => '4.0.900',
+            'authfailure'     => '4.0.972',
+            'badreputation'   => '4.0.975',
+            'blocked'         => '4.0.971',
+            'contenterror'    => '4.0.960',
+            # 'exceedlimit'   => '4.0.923',
+            'expired'         => '4.0.947',
+            'filtered'        => '4.0.924',
+            # 'hasmoved'      => '4.0.916',
+            # 'hostunknown'   => '4.0.912',
+            'mailboxfull'     => '4.0.922',
+            # 'mailererror'   => '4.0.939',
+            # 'mesgtoobig'    => '4.0.934',
+            'networkerror'    => '4.0.944',
+            # 'norelaying'    => '4.0.909',
+            'notaccept'       => '4.0.932',
+            'notcompliantrfc' => '4.0.974',
+            'onhold'          => '4.0.901',
+            'rejected'        => '4.0.918',
+            'requireptr'      => '4.0.973',
+            'securityerror'   => '4.0.970',
+            'spamdetected'    => '4.0.980',
+            'speeding'        => '4.0.946',
+            # 'suspend'       => '4.0.921',
+            'systemerror'     => '4.0.930',
+            'systemfull'      => '4.0.931',
+            'toomanyconn'     => '4.0.945',
+            # 'userunknown'   => '4.0.911',
+            'undefined'       => '4.0.900',
           },
           :permanent => {
+            'authfailure'     => '5.0.972',
+            'badreputation'   => '5.0.975',
             'blocked'         => '5.0.971',
             'contenterror'    => '5.0.960',
             'exceedlimit'     => '5.0.923',
@@ -694,11 +642,14 @@ module Sisimai
             'networkerror'    => '5.0.944',
             'norelaying'      => '5.0.909',
             'notaccept'       => '5.0.932',
+            'notcompliantrfc' => '5.0.974',
             'onhold'          => '5.0.901',
             'policyviolation' => '5.0.972',
             'rejected'        => '5.0.918',
+            'requireptr'      => '5.0.973',
             'securityerror'   => '5.0.970',
             'spamdetected'    => '5.0.980',
+            'speeding'        => '5.0.946',
             'suspend'         => '5.0.921',
             'systemerror'     => '5.0.930',
             'systemfull'      => '5.0.931',
@@ -727,38 +678,198 @@ module Sisimai
 
         # Convert from the status code to the reason string
         # @param    [String] argv1  Status code(DSN)
-        # @return   [String, Nil]   Reason name or Nil if the first argument did
-        #                           not match with values in Sisimai's reason list
+        # @return   [String]        Reason name 
+        #           [Nil]           The first argument did not match with values in reason list
         # @see      code
         def name(argv1 = nil)
           return nil unless argv1
-          return nil unless argv1 =~ /\A[245][.]\d[.]\d+\z/
+          return nil unless Sisimai::SMTP::Status.test(argv1)
           return StandardCode[argv1] || nil
         end
 
+        # Check whether a status code is a valid code or not
+        # @param    [String] argv1  Status code(DSN)
+        # @return   [Boolean]       0 = Invalid status code, 1 = Valid status code
+        # @see      code
+        # @since v5.0.0
+        def test(argv1 = '')
+          return nil   if argv1.to_s.empty?
+          return false if argv1.size < 5
+          return false if argv1.size > 7
+
+          token = []
+          argv1.split('.').each { |e| token << e.to_i }
+          return false unless token.size == 3
+          return false if token[0]  < 2
+          return false if token[0] == 3
+          return false if token[0]  > 5
+          return false if token[1]  < 0
+          return false if token[1]  > 7
+          return false if token[2]  < 0
+          return true
+        end
+
         # Get a DSN code value from given string including DSN
         # @param    [String] argv1  String including DSN
-        # @return   [String, Nil]   DSN or Nil if the first agument did not
-        #                           include DSN
-        def find(argv1 = nil)
-          return nil unless argv1
-          return nil if argv1.empty?
+        # @param    [String] argv2  An SMTP Reply Code or 2 or 4 or 5
+        # @return   [String, Nil]   An SMTP Status Code
+        def find(argv1 = nil, argv2 = '0')
+          return nil if argv1.to_s.empty?
+          return nil if argv1.size < 7
+
+          givenclass = argv2[0, 1]
+          eestatuses = if givenclass == '2' || givenclass == '4' || givenclass == '5' 
+                         [givenclass + '.']
+                       else
+                         ['5.', '4.', '2.']
+                       end
+          esmtperror = ' ' + argv1 + ' '
+          lookingfor = []
 
-          found = nil
-          CodePatterns.each do |e|
-            # Get the value of D.S.N. in the text
-            next unless r = argv1.match(e)
-            found = r[1]
+          Sisimai::String.ipv4(esmtperror).each do |e|
+            # Rewrite an IPv4 address in the given string(argv1) with '***.***.***.***'
+            p0 = esmtperror.index(e) || next
+            esmtperror[p0, e.size] = '***.***.***.***'
+          end
+
+          eestatuses.each do |e|
+            # Count the number of "5.", "4.", and "2." in the error message
+            p0 = 0; p1 = 0
+            while p0
+              # Find all of the "5." and "4." string and store its postion
+              p0 = esmtperror.index(e, p1) || break
+              lookingfor << [p0, e]
+              p1 = p0 + 5
+            end
+          end
+          return nil if lookingfor.size == 0
+
+          statuscode = []   # List of SMTP Status Code, Keep the order of appearances
+          anotherone = ''   # Alternative code
+          readbuffer = ''
+          characters = []   # Characters around the status code found by index()
+          indexofees = nil  # A position of SMTP status code found by the index()
+
+          lookingfor.sort_by(&:first).each do |e|
+            # Try to find an SMTP Status Code from the given string
+            indexofees = esmtperror.index(e[1], e[0]); next unless indexofees
+            characters = [esmtperror[indexofees - 1, 1].ord]  # [0] The previous character of the status
+            [2, 3].each do |i|
+              # [1] The value of the "Subject", "5.[7].261"
+              # [2] "." chacater, a separator of the Subject and the Detail
+              if indexofees + 1 + i > esmtperror.size
+                characters << 0
+              else
+                characters << esmtperror[indexofees + i, 1].ord
+              end
+            end
 
-            if argv1 =~ /\b(?:#{found}[.]\d{1,3}|\d{1,3}[.]#{found})\b/
-              # Clear and skip if the value is an IPv4 address
-              found = nil
+            next if characters[0]  > 45 && characters[0]  <  58 # Previous character is a number
+            next if characters[0] == 86 || characters[0] == 118 # Avoid a version number("V" or "v")
+            next if characters[1]  < 48 || characters[1]  >  55 # The value of the subject is not a number(0-7)
+            next if characters[2] != 46                         # It is not a "." character: a separator
+            readbuffer = e[1] + characters[1].chr + '.'
+
+            [4, 5, 6, 7].each do |i|
+              # [3] The 1st digit of the detail
+              # [4] The 2nd digit of the detail
+              # [5] The 3rd digit of the detail
+              # [6] The next character
+              if indexofees + 1 + i > esmtperror.size
+                characters << 0
+              else
+                characters << esmtperror[indexofees + i, 1].ord
+              end
+            end
+
+            next if characters[3] < 48 || characters[3] > 57  # The 1st digit of the detail is not a number
+            readbuffer << characters[3].chr
+
+            if readbuffer.index('.0.0') || readbuffer == '4.4.7'
+              # Find another status code except *.0.0, 4.4.7
+              anotherone = readbuffer
+              next
+            end
+
+            if characters[4] < 48 || characters[4] > 57
+              # The 2nd digit of the detail is not a number
+              statuscode << readbuffer
               next
             end
-            break
+            readbuffer << characters[4].chr # The 2nd digit of the detail is a number
+
+            if characters[5] < 48 || characters[5] > 57
+              # The 3rd digit of the detail is not a number
+              statuscode << readbuffer
+              next
+            end
+            readbuffer << characters[5].chr # The 3rd digit of the detail is a number
+
+            next if characters[6] > 47 && characters[6] < 58
+            statuscode << readbuffer
+          end
+
+          statuscode << anotherone if anotherone.size > 0
+          return nil if statuscode.size == 0
+          return statuscode.shift
+        end
+
+        # Return the preferred value selected from the arguments
+        # @param    [String] argv0  The value of Status:
+        # @param    [String] argv1  The delivery status picked from the error message
+        # @param    [String] argv2  The value of An SMTP Reply Code
+        # @return   [String]        The preferred value
+        # @since v5.0.0
+        def prefer(argv0 = nil, argv1 = nil, argv2 = nil)
+          return argv1 unless argv0; return argv1 unless argv0.size > 4
+          return argv0 unless argv1; return argv0 unless argv1.size > 4
+
+          statuscode = argv0
+          codeinmesg = argv1
+          esmtpreply = argv2 || '000'
+          the1stchar = {
+            'field' => statuscode[0, 1].to_i,
+            'error' => codeinmesg[0, 1].to_i,
+            'reply' => esmtpreply.to_s[0, 1].to_i,
+          }
+
+          if the1stchar['reply'] > 0 && the1stchar['field'] != the1stchar['error']
+            # There is the 3rd argument (an SMTP Reply Code)
+            # Returns the value of $argv0 or $argv1 which begins with the 1st character of argv2
+            return statuscode if the1stchar['reply'] == the1stchar['field']
+            return codeinmesg if the1stchar['reply'] == the1stchar['error']
+          end
+          return statuscode if statuscode == codeinmesg
+
+          zeroindex1 = { 'field' => statuscode.index('.0')   || -1, 'error' => codeinmesg.index('.0')   || -1 }
+          zeroindex2 = { 'field' => statuscode.index('.0.0') || -1, 'error' => codeinmesg.index('.0.0') || -1 }
+
+          if zeroindex2['field'] > 0
+            # "Status:" field is "X.0.0"
+            return codeinmesg if zeroindex2['error'] < 0
+            return statuscode
+          end
+
+          if zeroindex1['field'] > 0
+            # "Status:" field is "X.Y.0" or "X.0.Z"
+            return codeinmesg if zeroindex1['error'] < 0
+          end
+
+          return statuscode if zeroindex2['error'] > 0        # An SMTP status code is "X.0.0"
+          return codeinmesg if statuscode == '4.4.7'          # "4.4.7" is an ambiguous code
+          return codeinmesg if statuscode.start_with?('5.3.') # "5.3.Z" is an error of a system
+
+          if statuscode == '5.1.1'
+            # "5.1.1" is a code of "userunknown"
+            return statuscode if zeroindex1['error'] > 0
+            return codeinmesg
+
+          elsif statuscode == '5.1.3'
+            # "5.1.3"
+            return codeinmesg if codeinmesg.start_with?('5.7.')
           end
 
-          return found
+          return statuscode
         end
 
       end