sisimai 4.25.13-java → 4.25.15-java

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
1
+ module Sisimai
2
+ module Rhost
3
+ # Sisimai::Rhost detects the bounce reason from the content of Sisimai::Data object as an argu-
4
+ # ment of get() method when the value of "rhost" of the object is "*.mimecast.com". This class
5
+ # is called only Sisimai::Fact class.
6
+ module Mimecast
7
+ class << self
8
+ MessagesOf = {
9
+ # https://community.mimecast.com/s/article/Mimecast-SMTP-Error-Codes-842605754
10
+ 'blocked' => [
11
+ # - The sender's IP address has been blocked by a Blocked Senders Policy.
12
+ # - Remove the entry from the policy.
13
+ [421, 'sender address blocked'],
14
+
15
+ # - The Sender's IP address has been placed on the block list due to too many invalid
16
+ # connections.
17
+ # - The sender's mail server must retry the connection. The mail server performing the
18
+ # connection says the recipient address validation isn't responding.
19
+ [451, 'recipient temporarily unavailable'],
20
+
21
+ # - You've reached your mail server's limit.
22
+ # - Wait and try again. The mail server won't accept any messages until you're under
23
+ # the limit.
24
+ [451, 'ip temporarily blacklisted'],
25
+
26
+ # - The sending mail server is subjected to Greylisting. This requires the server to
27
+ # retry the connection, between one minute and 12 hours. Alternatively, the sender's
28
+ # IP address has a poor reputation.
29
+ # - These reputation checks can be bypassed with an Auto Allow or Permitted Senders
30
+ # policy. If it's legitimate traffic, amend your Greylisting policy.
31
+ [451, 'internal resources are temporarily unavailable'],
32
+
33
+ # - Ongoing reputation checks have resulted in the message being rejected due to poor
34
+ # IP reputation. This could occur after a 4xx error.
35
+ # - Create an Auto Allow or Permitted Senders policy.
36
+ # Note:
37
+ # You can request a review of your source IP ranges by completing our online form.
38
+ [550, 'local ct ip reputation - (reject)'],
39
+
40
+ # - The sender's IP address is listed in an RBL. The text displayed is specific to the
41
+ # RBL which lists the sender's IP address.
42
+ # - Bypass the RBL with an Auto Allow or Permitted Senders policy. Additionally request
43
+ # the associated IP address from the RBL.
44
+ #[550, '< details of RBL >'], NEED AN ACTUAL ERROR MESSAGE STRING
45
+
46
+ # - The inbound message has been rejected because the originated IP address isn't list-
47
+ # ed in the published SPF records for the sending domain.
48
+ # - Ensure all the IP addresses for your mail servers are listed in your SPF records.
49
+ # Alternatively, create a DNS Authentication (Inbound / Outbound) policy with the
50
+ # "Inbound SPF" or "Reject on Hard Fail" option disabled. Messages that fail our SPF
51
+ # checks are subjected to spam and RBL checks, instead of being rejected.
52
+ [550, 'spf sender invalid - envelope rejected'],
53
+
54
+ # - The DKIM key for the outbound message is broken and doesn't match the DNS record of
55
+ # the registered sender.
56
+ # - Check your organization's DNS record is populated with the right public key as part
57
+ # of the DNS Authentication Outbound Signing definition. The private key of the key-
58
+ # pair must be populated in the DNS Authentication policy, along with the domain and
59
+ # selector of that record.
60
+ [550, 'dkim sender invalid - envelope rejected'],
61
+
62
+ # - The inbound message has been rejected because the originated IP address isn't list-
63
+ # ed in the published SPF records for the sending domain.
64
+ # - Ensure all the IP addresses for your mail servers are listed in your SPF records.
65
+ [550, 'dmarc sender invalid - envelope rejected'],
66
+ ],
67
+ 'mesgtoobig' => [
68
+ # - The email size either exceeds an Email Size Limit policy or is larger than the
69
+ # Mimecast service limit. The default is 100 MB for the Legacy MTA, and 200 MB for
70
+ # "the Latest MTA".
71
+ # - Resend the message ensuring it's smaller than the limitation set. The transmission
72
+ # and content-encoding can add significantly to the total message size (e.g. a mes-
73
+ # sage with a 70 MB attachment, can have an overall size larger than 100 MB).
74
+ [554, 'maximum email size exceeded'],
75
+ ],
76
+ 'networkerror' => [
77
+ # - The message has too many "received headers" as it has been forwarded across multi-
78
+ # ple hops. Once 25 hops have been reached, the email is rejected.
79
+ # - Investigate the email addresses in the communication pairs, to see what forwarders
80
+ # are configured on the mail servers.
81
+ [554, 'mail loop detected'],
82
+ ],
83
+ 'norelaying' => [
84
+ # - Both the sender and recipient domains specified in the transmission are external to
85
+ # Mimecast, and aren't allowed to relay through the Mimecast service and/or the con-
86
+ # necting IP address isn't recognized as authorized.
87
+ # - Mimecast customers should contact Mimecast Support to add the Authorized Outbound
88
+ # address, or to take other remedial action.
89
+ [451, 'open relay not allowed'],
90
+ ],
91
+ 'notaccept' => [
92
+ # - The customer account Inbound emails are disabled in the Administration Console.
93
+ # - Contact Mimecast Support if the account's inbound traffic should be allowed.
94
+ [451, 'account inbounds disabled'],
95
+ ],
96
+ 'onhold' => [
97
+ # - The customer account outbound emails are disabled in the Administration Console.
98
+ # - Contact Mimecast Support if the account's outbound traffic should be allowed.
99
+ [451, 'account outbounds disabled'],
100
+
101
+ # - Omni Directional hostnames are enabled.
102
+ # - Disable Omni Directional hostnames.
103
+ [451, 'hostname is not authorized'],
104
+
105
+ # - Attempts are being made to journal mail that is past the set expiry threshold. The
106
+ # failure will be replaced by a retry response because the message is marked for re-
107
+ # try if rejected, causing the journal queue to grow.
108
+ # - Check to confirm there are no significant time discrepancies on the mail server.
109
+ # Discontinue journaling old messages past the expiry threshold.
110
+ [550, 'journal message past expiration'],
111
+ ],
112
+ 'policyviolation' => [
113
+ # - The message has triggered an Anti-Spoofing policy.
114
+ # - Create an Anti-Spoofing policy to take no action for the sender's address or IP ad-
115
+ # dress.
116
+ [550, 'anti-spoofing policy - inbound not allowed'],
117
+ [550, 'rejected by header-based anti-spoofing policy'],
118
+
119
+ # - The message has triggered a Content Examination policy.
120
+ # - Either create a Content Examination Bypass policy or adjust the Content Examination
121
+ # policy as required.
122
+ [550, 'message bounced due to content examination policy'],
123
+
124
+ # - The message has triggered a Geographical Restriction policy.
125
+ # - Delete or amend the policy.
126
+ [554, 'host network not allowed'],
127
+ ],
128
+ 'rejected' => [
129
+ # - The sender's email address or domain has triggered a Blocked Senders Policy or
130
+ # there's an SPF hard rejection.
131
+ # - Delete or modify the Blocked Senders policy to exclude the sender address.
132
+ [550, 'administrative prohibition envelope blocked'],
133
+
134
+ # - A personal block policy is in place for the email address/domain.
135
+ # - Remove the email address/domain from the Managed Senders list.
136
+ [550, 'envelope blocked – user entry'],
137
+ [550, 'envelope blocked – user domain entry'],
138
+ [550, 'rejected by header-based manually blocked senders - block for manual block'],
139
+
140
+ # - A Block Sender Policy has been applied to reject emails based on the Header From or
141
+ # Envelope From address.
142
+ # - Delete or change the Blocked Senders policy.
143
+ [550, 'rejected by header-based blocked senders - block policy for header from'],
144
+ [550, 'envelope rejected - block policy for envelope from address'],
145
+ ],
146
+ 'securityerror' => [
147
+ # - Messages submitted to SMTP port 587 require authentication. This error indicates
148
+ # the authentication details provided were incorrect.
149
+ # - Check your authentication details match an internal email address in Mimecast, with
150
+ # a corresponding Mimecast cloud password. Alternatively, consider sending the mes-
151
+ # sage on SMTP port 25.
152
+ [535, 'incorrect authentication data'],
153
+ [550, 'submitter failed to disabled'],
154
+
155
+ # - This email has been sent using SMTP, but TLS is required by policy.
156
+ # - Delete or change the Secure Receipt or Secure Delivery policy enforcing TLS.
157
+ # Alternatively, ensure the certificates on the mail server haven't expired. If using
158
+ # a proxy server, ensure it isn't intercepting the traffic and modifying encryption
159
+ # parameters.
160
+ [553, 'this route requires encryption (tls)'],
161
+
162
+ # - A TLS connection has been attempted using a TLS version that is lower than TLS 1.2.
163
+ # - Delete or change the Secure Receipt or Secure Delivery policy enforcing TLS.
164
+ # Alternatively, ensure the mail server attempting to connect is using the appropri-
165
+ # ate version of TLS.
166
+ [553, 'this route requires tls version 1.2 or greater'],
167
+
168
+ # - A secure connection was attempted using ciphers that do not meet the configured ci-
169
+ # pher strength.
170
+ # - Delete or change the Secure Receipt or Secure Delivery policy enforcing TLS. Alter-
171
+ # natively, ensure the certificates on the mail server haven't expired. If using a
172
+ # proxy server, ensure it isn't intercepting the traffic and modifying encryption
173
+ # parameters.
174
+ [553, 'this route requires high-strength ciphers'],
175
+
176
+ # - Validation on your umbrella account's domain name does not conform to your DNS.
177
+ # - Check you DNS has the required umbrella accounts listed as comma-separated values.
178
+ [554, 'configuration is invalid for this certificate'],
179
+ ],
180
+ 'systemerror' => [
181
+ # - The Mimecast server is under maximum load.
182
+ # - No action is required from the end-user. The message will retry 30 times and when
183
+ # server resources are available, the message is processed.
184
+ [451, 'unable to process connection at this time'],
185
+
186
+ # - The message was incorrectly terminated. This can be caused by:
187
+ # - Files that previously contained a virus, but haven't been cleaned by an anti-virus
188
+ # product, leaving traces in the message.
189
+ # - Firewall issues on the sender's side.
190
+ # - Incorrectly configured content rules on a security device.
191
+ # - Investigate the Intrusion Detection software or other SMTP protocol analyzers. If
192
+ # running a Cisco Firewall, ensure the Mail- guard or SMTP Fixup module is disabled.
193
+ [451, 'message ended early'],
194
+
195
+ # - Generic error if the reason is unknown
196
+ # - Contact Mimecast Support.
197
+ [451, 'unable to process command'],
198
+
199
+ # - Generic error if the reason is unknown
200
+ # - Contact Mimecast Support.
201
+ [451, 'unable to process an email at this time'],
202
+ ],
203
+ 'toomanyconn' => [
204
+ # - There are too many concurrent inbound connections for the account. The default is 20.
205
+ # - The IP address is automatically removed from the block list after five minutes.
206
+ # Continued invalid connections result in the IP being readded to the block list. En-
207
+ # sure you don't route outbound or journal messages to Mimecast from an IP address
208
+ # that hasn't been authorized to do so.
209
+ [451, 'account service is temporarily unavailable'],
210
+
211
+ # - The sending server issues more than 100 RCPT TO entries. By default, Mimecast only
212
+ # accepts 100 RCPT TO entries per message body (DATA). The error triggers the sending
213
+ # mail server to provide the DATA for the first 100 recipients before it provides the
214
+ # next batch of RCPT TO entries.
215
+ # - Most mail servers respect the transient error and treat it as a "truncation request".
216
+ # If your mail server, firewall, or on-site solution doesn't respect the error, you
217
+ # must ensure that no more than 100 recipients are submitted.
218
+ # Note:
219
+ # Solutions like SMTP Fix-Up / MailGuard and ESMTP inspection on Cisco Pix and
220
+ # ASA Firewalls are known not to respect the transient error. We advise you to
221
+ # disable this functionality.
222
+ [452, 'too many recipients'],
223
+
224
+ # - There are too many concurrent outbound connections for the account.
225
+ # - Send the messages in smaller chunks to recipients.
226
+ [550, 'exceeding outbound thread limit'],
227
+ ],
228
+ 'userunknown' => [
229
+ # - The email address isn't a valid SMTP address.
230
+ # - The sender must resend the message to a valid internal email address.
231
+ [501, 'invalid address'],
232
+
233
+ # - The server has encountered a bad sequence of commands, or it requires an authenti-
234
+ # cation.
235
+ # - In case of a "bad sequence", the server has pulled off its commands in the wrong
236
+ # order, usually because of a broken connection. If authentication is needed, enter
237
+ # your username and password.
238
+ [503, 'user unknown'],
239
+
240
+ # - Known recipient, LDAP, or SMTP call forwarding recipient validation checks haven't
241
+ # returned a valid internal user.
242
+ # - The sender must resend the message to a valid internal recipient address.
243
+ [550, 'invalid recipient'],
244
+ ],
245
+ 'virusdetected' => [
246
+ # - A signature was detected that could either be a virus, or a spam score over the
247
+ # maximum threshold. The spam score isn't available in the Administration Console. If
248
+ # you aren't a Mimecast customer but have emails rejected with this error code, con-
249
+ # tact the recipient to adjust their configuration and permit your address. If unsuc-
250
+ # cessful, your IT department can submit a request to review these email rejections
251
+ # via our Sender Feedback form.
252
+ # - Anti-virus checks cannot be bypassed. Contact the sender to see if they can stop
253
+ # these messages from being blocked. Anti-spam checks can be bypassed using a Per-
254
+ # mitted Senders or Auto Allow policy. Rejected emails can be viewed in your Outbound
255
+ # Activity and searching for the required email address.
256
+ [554, 'email rejected due to security policies'],
257
+ ],
258
+ }.freeze
259
+
260
+ # Detect bounce reason from Mimecast
261
+ # @param [Sisimai::Fact] argvs Parsed email object
262
+ # @return [String] The bounce reason for mimecast.com
263
+ def get(argvs)
264
+ return '' unless argvs.replycode =~ /\A[245]\d\d\z/
265
+ return '' unless argvs.diagnosticcode
266
+
267
+ esmtperror = argvs.diagnosticcode.downcase || ''
268
+ esmtpreply = argvs.replycode.to_i
269
+ reasontext = ''
270
+
271
+ MessagesOf.each_key do |e|
272
+ # Try to match the error message with message patterns defined in "MessagesOf"
273
+ MessagesOf[e].each do |f|
274
+ # Find an error reason
275
+ next unless esmtpreply == f[0]
276
+ next unless esmtperror.include?(f[1])
277
+ reasontext = e
278
+ break
279
+ end
280
+ break unless reasontext.empty?
281
+ end
282
+
283
+ return reasontext
284
+ end
285
+
286
+ end
287
+ end
288
+ end
289
+ end
290
+
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
1
+ module Sisimai
2
+ module Rhost
3
+ # Sisimai::Rhost detects the bounce reason from the content of Sisimai::Data object as an argument
4
+ # of get() method when the value of "rhost" of the object is "mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp". This class
5
+ # is called only Sisimai::Data class.
6
+ module NTTDOCOMO
7
+ class << self
8
+ MessagesOf = {
9
+ 'mailboxfull' => %r/552 too much mail data/,
10
+ 'toomanyconn' => %r/552 too many recipients/,
11
+ 'syntaxerror' => %r/(?:503 bad sequence of commands|504 command parameter not implemented)/,
12
+ }.freeze
13
+
14
+ # Detect bounce reason from NTT DOCOMO
15
+ # @param [Sisimai::Data] argvs Parsed email object
16
+ # @return [String] The bounce reason for docomo.ne.jp
17
+ def get(argvs)
18
+ statuscode = argvs.deliverystatus || ''
19
+ commandtxt = argvs.smtpcommand || ''
20
+ esmtperror = argvs.diagnosticcode.downcase || ''
21
+ reasontext = ''
22
+
23
+ # Check the value of Status: field, an SMTP Reply Code, and the SMTP Command
24
+ if statuscode == '5.1.1' || statuscode == '5.0.911'
25
+ # ----- Transcript of session follows -----
26
+ # ... while talking to mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp.:
27
+ # >>> RCPT To:<***@docomo.ne.jp>
28
+ # <<< 550 Unknown user ***@docomo.ne.jp
29
+ # 550 5.1.1 <***@docomo.ne.jp>... User unknown
30
+ # >>> DATA
31
+ # <<< 503 Bad sequence of commands
32
+ reasontext = 'userunknown'
33
+
34
+ elsif statuscode == '5.2.0'
35
+ # ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
36
+ # <***@docomo.ne.jp>
37
+ # (reason: 550 Unknown user ***@docomo.ne.jp)
38
+ #
39
+ # ----- Transcript of session follows -----
40
+ # ... while talking to mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp.:
41
+ # >>> DATA
42
+ # <<< 550 Unknown user ***@docomo.ne.jp
43
+ # 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
44
+ # ...
45
+ # Final-Recipient: RFC822; ***@docomo.ne.jp
46
+ # Action: failed
47
+ # Status: 5.2.0
48
+ reasontext = 'filtered'
49
+
50
+ else
51
+ # The value of "Diagnostic-Code:" field is not empty
52
+ MessagesOf.each_key do |e|
53
+ # Try to match the error message with message patterns defined in "MessagesOf"
54
+ next unless esmtperror =~ MessagesOf[e]
55
+ reasontext = e
56
+ break
57
+ end
58
+ end
59
+
60
+ if reasontext.empty?
61
+ # A bounce reason did not decide from a status code, an error message.
62
+ if statuscode == '5.0.0'
63
+ # Status: 5.0.0
64
+ if commandtxt == 'RCPT'
65
+ # Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered:
66
+ #
67
+ # <***@docomo.ne.jp>:
68
+ # mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp [203.138.181.112]:
69
+ # >>> RCPT TO:<***@docomo.ne.jp>
70
+ # <<< 550 Unknown user ***@docomo.ne.jp
71
+ # ...
72
+ #
73
+ # Final-Recipient: rfc822; ***@docomo.ne.jp
74
+ # Action: failed
75
+ # Status: 5.0.0
76
+ # Remote-MTA: dns; mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp [203.138.181.112]
77
+ # Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Unknown user ***@docomo.ne.jp
78
+ reasontext = 'userunknown'
79
+
80
+ elsif commandtxt == 'DATA'
81
+ # <***@docomo.ne.jp>: host mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp[203.138.181.240] said:
82
+ # 550 Unknown user ***@docomo.ne.jp (in reply to end of DATA
83
+ # command)
84
+ # ...
85
+ # Final-Recipient: rfc822; ***@docomo.ne.jp
86
+ # Original-Recipient: rfc822;***@docomo.ne.jp
87
+ # Action: failed
88
+ # Status: 5.0.0
89
+ # Remote-MTA: dns; mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp
90
+ # Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Unknown user ***@docomo.ne.jp
91
+ reasontext = 'rejected'
92
+
93
+ else
94
+ # Rejected by other SMTP commands: AUTH, MAIL,
95
+ # もしもこのブロックを通過するNTTドコモからのエラーメッセージを見つけたら
96
+ # https://github.com/sisimai/p5-sisimai/issues からご連絡ねがいます。
97
+ #
98
+ # If you found a error message from mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp which passes this block,
99
+ # please open an issue at https://github.com/sisimai/p5-sisimai/issues .
100
+ end
101
+ else
102
+ # Status: field is neither 5.0.0 nor values defined in code above
103
+ # もしもこのブロックを通過するNTTドコモからのエラーメッセージを見つけたら
104
+ # https://github.com/sisimai/p5-sisimai/issues からご連絡ねがいます。
105
+ #
106
+ # If you found a error message from mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp which passes this block,
107
+ #
108
+ end
109
+ end
110
+
111
+ return reasontext
112
+ end
113
+
114
+ end
115
+ end
116
+ end
117
+ end
118
+
data/lib/sisimai/rhost.rb CHANGED
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ module Sisimai
7
7
  class << self
8
8
  # Imported from p5-Sisimail/lib/Sisimai/Rhost.pm
9
9
  RhostClass = {
10
+ 'cox.net' => 'Cox',
10
11
  '.prod.outlook.com' => 'ExchangeOnline',
11
12
  '.protection.outlook.com' => 'ExchangeOnline',
12
13
  'laposte.net' => 'FrancePTT',
@@ -19,8 +20,9 @@ module Sisimai
19
20
  '.email.ua' => 'IUA',
20
21
  'lsean.ezweb.ne.jp' => 'KDDI',
21
22
  'msmx.au.com' => 'KDDI',
23
+ '.mimecast.com' => 'Mimecast',
24
+ 'mfsmax.docomo.ne.jp' => 'NTTDOCOMO',
22
25
  'charter.net' => 'Spectrum',
23
- 'cox.net' => 'Cox',
24
26
  '.qq.com' => 'TencentQQ',
25
27
  }.freeze
26
28
 
@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ module Sisimai
66
66
  # 3. <a href = 'http://...'>...</a> to " http://... "
67
67
  # 4. <a href = 'mailto:...'>...</a> to " Value <mailto:...> "
68
68
  plain.scrub!('?')
69
- plain.gsub!(%r|<head>.+</head>|im, '')
70
- plain.gsub!(%r|<style.+?>.+</style>|im, '')
69
+ plain.gsub!(%r|<head>.*?</head>|im, '')
70
+ plain.gsub!(%r|<style.*?>.*?</style>|im, '')
71
71
  plain.gsub!(%r|<a\s+href\s*=\s*['"](https?://.+?)['"].*?>(.*?)</a>|i, '[\2](\1)')
72
72
  plain.gsub!(%r|<a\s+href\s*=\s*["']mailto:([^\s]+?)["']>(.*?)</a>|i, '[\2](mailto:\1)')
73
73
 
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1
1
  # Define the version number of Sisimai
2
2
  module Sisimai
3
- VERSION = '4.25.13'.freeze
3
+ VERSION = '4.25.15'.freeze
4
4
  end
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
1
+ Return-Path: <>
2
+ Delivered-To: kijitora@example.co.jp
3
+ Received: from smtp.example.co.jp
4
+ by neko.example.co.jp (Dovecot) with LMTP id YZv2MOmWGmDvLgAA4iEyMQ
5
+ for <kijitora@example.co.jp>; Thu, 02 Feb 2021 23:34:45 +0900
6
+ Received: by smtp.example.co.jp (Postfix)
7
+ id PcWLPhBbNNzq4GD0; Thu, 2 Feb 2021 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
8
+ Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2021 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
9
+ From: MAILER-DAEMON@smtp.example.co.jp (Mail Delivery System)
10
+ Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
11
+ To: kijitora@example.co.jp
12
+ Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
13
+ MIME-Version: 1.0
14
+ Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
15
+ boundary="XkB0QWwjfhzQcf0c.160000000/smtp.example.co.jp"
16
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
17
+ Message-Id: <PcWLPhBbNNzq4GD0@smtp.example.co.jp>
18
+
19
+ This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
20
+
21
+ --XkB0QWwjfhzQcf0c.160000000/smtp.example.co.jp
22
+ Content-Description: Notification
23
+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
24
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
25
+
26
+ This is the mail system at host smtp.example.co.jp.
27
+
28
+ I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
29
+ be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
30
+
31
+ For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
32
+
33
+ If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
34
+ delete your own text from the attached returned message.
35
+
36
+ The mail system
37
+
38
+ <sabatora@example.com>: host
39
+ us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com[207.211.30.221] said: 554 Host network not
40
+ allowed - https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#554
41
+ [z7qZw5BPd1zlDYHka4589ru.us222] (in reply to RCPT TO command)
42
+
43
+ --XkB0QWwjfhzQcf0c.160000000/smtp.example.co.jp
44
+ Content-Description: Delivery report
45
+ Content-Type: message/delivery-status
46
+
47
+ Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp.example.co.jp
48
+ X-Postfix-Queue-ID: XkB0QWwjfhzQcf0c
49
+ X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; kijitora@example.co.jp
50
+ Arrival-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2021 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
51
+
52
+ Final-Recipient: rfc822; sabatora@example.com
53
+ Original-Recipient: rfc822;sabatora@example.com
54
+ Action: failed
55
+ Status: 5.0.0
56
+ Remote-MTA: dns; us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
57
+ Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 Host network not allowed -
58
+ https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#554
59
+ [z7qZw5BPd1zlDYHka4589ru.us222]
60
+
61
+ --XkB0QWwjfhzQcf0c.160000000/smtp.example.co.jp
62
+ Content-Description: Undelivered Message
63
+ Content-Type: message/rfc822
64
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
65
+
66
+ Return-Path: <kijitora@example.co.jp>
67
+ Received: from 6bBckZSRc0zMvk9Z (unknown [192.0.2.2])
68
+ (Authenticated sender: kijitora@example.co.jp)
69
+ by smtp.example.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id XkB0QWwjfhzQcf0c
70
+ for <sabatora@example.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2021 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
71
+ From: Automated Message <kijitora@example.co.jp>
72
+ Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2021 23:34:45 +0100
73
+ Subject: Automatic reply : domain owner (Reg-C)
74
+ Message-ID: <7B0s8rbG08zYDdPt.WaOHIQht053802@NEKO-NYAAN-22.LOCAL>
75
+ To: sabatora@example.com
76
+ X-Mailer: NEKO-NYAAN
77
+ MIME-Version: 1.0
78
+ Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
79
+ boundary="=-QX/4rTBwaN4065581=="
80
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
81
+
82
+ --=-QX/4rTBwaN4065581==
83
+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
84
+
85
+ --=-QX/4rTBwaN4065581==--
86
+
87
+
88
+ --XkB0QWwjfhzQcf0c.160000000/smtp.example.co.jp--
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
1
+ Delivered-To: automated-bounces+feffeeff-0002-ebbb-8192-00101100ffefee@email.example.com
2
+ Received: by 192.0.2.117 with SMTP id UfAUHGQO080319;
3
+ Thu, 29 Apr 2022 23:34:45 -0800 (PST)
4
+ Received: by 192.0.2.116 with SMTP id zwKF2wfslXzPbG51.22.20220022322;
5
+ Thu, 29 Apr 2022 23:34:45 -0800 (PST)
6
+ Return-Path: <>
7
+ Received: from nyaan2.example.co.uk (nyaan2.example.co.uk. [192.0.2.117])
8
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 2mcBI4Uh025855.114.2022.04.29.23.34.45;
9
+ Thu, 29 Apr 2022 23:34:45 -0800 (PST)
10
+ Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nyaan2.example.co.uk designates 192.0.2.117 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.0.2.117;
11
+ Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nyaan2.example.co.uk designates 192.0.2.117 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=
12
+ Received: by nyaan2.example.co.uk (Postfix)
13
+ id zyrWXqvX71zdjmrD; Thu, 29 Apr 2022 23:34:45 +0000 (GMT)
14
+ Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2022 23:34:45 +0000 (GMT)
15
+ From: MAILER-DAEMON@nyaan2.example.co.uk (Mail Delivery System)
16
+ Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
17
+ To: automated-bounces+7BE1D472-4B2D-11E1-9E82-A342CB4AA966@email.example.com
18
+ Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
19
+ MIME-Version: 1.0
20
+ Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
21
+ boundary="316C411E8435.000000000/nyaan2.example.co.uk"
22
+ Message-Id: <20220429233445.zyrWXqvX71zdjmrD@nyaan2.example.co.uk>
23
+
24
+ This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
25
+
26
+ --316C411E8435.000000000/nyaan2.example.co.uk
27
+ Content-Description: Notification
28
+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
29
+
30
+ This is the mail system at host nyaan2.example.co.uk.
31
+
32
+ I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
33
+ be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
34
+
35
+ For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
36
+
37
+ If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
38
+ delete your own text from the attached returned message.
39
+
40
+ The mail system
41
+
42
+ <kijitora@sample.co.uk>: host service222.mimecast.com[91.220.42.51] said: 554
43
+ email rejected due to security policies - MCSpamSignature.sa.2.2 (in reply
44
+ to end of DATA command)
45
+
46
+ --316C411E8435.000000000/nyaan2.example.co.uk
47
+ Content-Description: Delivery report
48
+ Content-Type: message/delivery-status
49
+
50
+ Reporting-MTA: dns; nyaan2.example.co.uk
51
+ X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 316C411E8435
52
+ X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; automated-bounces+FFFFFFFF-0000-EEEE-EEEE-00000000EEEE@email.example.com
53
+ Arrival-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2022 23:34:45 +0000 (GMT)
54
+
55
+ Final-Recipient: rfc822; kijitora@sample.co.uk
56
+ Action: failed
57
+ Status: 5.0.0
58
+ Remote-MTA: dns; service222.mimecast.com
59
+ Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 email rejected due to security policies -
60
+ MCSpamSignature.sa.2.2
61
+
62
+ --316C411E8435.000000000/nyaan2.example.co.uk
63
+ Content-Description: Undelivered Message
64
+ Content-Type: message/rfc822
65
+
66
+ Received: by nyaan2.example.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 222)
67
+ id 316C411E8435; Thu, 29 Apr 2022 23:34:45 +0000 (GMT)
68
+ MIME-Version: 1.0
69
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
70
+ Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_----------=_1055808412000000"
71
+ Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2022 23:34:45 +0000
72
+ From: Neko <neko@email.example.com>
73
+ Subject: Nyaan
74
+ To: Kijitora Nyaan <kijitora@sample.co.uk>
75
+ Message-Id: <20220429.0000.316C411E8435@nyaan2.example.co.uk>
76
+
77
+ This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
78
+
79
+ --_----------=_1055808412000000
80
+ Content-Disposition: inline
81
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
82
+ Content-Type: text/html
83
+
84
+ Nyaan
85
+
86
+ --_----------=_1055808412000000--
87
+
88
+
89
+ --316C411E8435.000000000/nyaan2.example.co.uk--
90
+