sisimai 4.14.2

data/set-of-emails/maildir/bsd/mxlogic-01.eml

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+Return-Path: <>
+Received: from mx9.relay.example.net (mx9.relay.example.net [192.0.2.22])
+	by 2jo.example.jp (V8/cf) with ESMTP id p977e8r8027078
+	for <shironeko@example.jp>; Thu, 29 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0900
+Received: by mxr4.example.net (mx909) id 00000000000000; Thu, 29 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0900
+Received: FROM queue-bounce BY relay0.mxl8.example.net WITH local;
+	Thu, 29 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0900
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0900
+From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@relay0.mxl8.example.net>
+To: shironeko@example.jp
+Subject: Mail delivery failed
+Message-Id: <mxl~fff.0000.0000@relay0.mxl8.example.net>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-MX-Bounce: mta/src/queue/bounce
+X-MXL-NoteHash: 0000000000000000-ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
+
+This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
+
+A message that you have sent could not be delivered to one or more
+recipients.  This is a permanent error.  The following address failed:
+
+  <kijitora@example.co.jp>: 550 5.1.1 <kijitora@example.co.jp>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
+
+
+
+Included is a copy of the message header:
+-----------------------------------------
+Received: from unknown [192.0.2.89] (EHLO 2jo.example.jp)
+	by relay0.mxl8.example.net(mxl_mta-6.5.0-4)
+	with ESMTP id ffffffff.0.000000.00-000.000000.relay0.mxl8.example.net 
+    (envelope-from <shironeko@example.jp>); Thu, 29 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0900 (JST)
+Received: from [192.0.2.31] (c135.kyoto.example.ne.jp [192.0.2.45])
+	(authenticated bits=0)
+	by 2jo.example.jp (V8/cf) with ESMTP id 00000000000000
+	for <kijitora@example.co.jp>; Thu, 29 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0900
+Message-Id: <0AE85451-E088-48AE-804E-1F4B713B6C63@example.jp>
+From: Shironeko <shironeko@example.jp>
+To: kijitora@example.co.jp
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
+Subject: Nyaaaan
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0900
+X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
+
+Nyaaan

data/set-of-emails/maildir/bsd/mxlogic-02.eml

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+Return-Path: <>
+Delivered-To: shironeko@example.or.jp
+Received: (qmail 1000 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2012 23:34:45 +0900
+Received: FROM mx43.example.jp BY mxl8.example.net WITH local;
+    Thu, 29 Apr 2012 23:34:45 +0900
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2012 23:34:45 +0900
+From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@mxl8.example.net>
+To: shironeko@example.or.jp
+Subject: Mail delivery failed
+Message-Id: <mxl~ffff.0000.0000@mxl8.example.net>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-MX-Bounce: mta/src/queue/bounce
+X-MXL-NoteHash: ffffffffffffffff-0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
+
+This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
+
+A message that you have sent could not be delivered to one or more
+recipients.  This is a permanent error.  The following address failed:
+
+  <kijitora@example.jp>: 550 5.1.1 <kijitora@example.jp>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
+
+
+
+Included is a copy of the message header:
+-----------------------------------------
+Received: from unknown [192.0.2.240] (EHLO relay5.example.or.jp)
+	by mxl8.example.net(mxl_mta-6.5.0-5)
+	with ESMTP id 00000000.0.0000000.00-000.00000000.mxl8.example.net 
+    (envelope-from <shironeko@example.or.jp>);
+	Thu, 29 Apr 2012 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
+Received: from unknown (HELO relay4.example.or.jp) (192.0.2.28)
+    by 192.0.2.178 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2012 23:34:45 +0900
+Message-ID: <0000000.000000000000@relay4.example.or.jp>
+Reply-To: Nyanko <shironeko@example.or.jp>
+To: Kijitora <kijitora@example.jp>
+Subject: Nyaaan
+Mime-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2012 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
+From: Shironeko <shironeko@example.or.jp>
+
+Nyaan

data/set-of-emails/maildir/bsd/mxlogic-03.eml

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
+	by mx4145.example.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00000000000
+	for <shironeko@example.co.jp>; Thu, 29 Apr 2009 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
+From: "Mail Delivery System" <MAILER-DAEMON@00000000.mxlogic.net>
+To: <shironeko@mx4145.example.org>
+Subject: Mail delivery failed
+Date: Wed, 14 May 2009 23:34:45 +0900
+Message-ID: <mxl~0000.0000.0000@00000000.mxlogic.net>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain;
+	charset="iso-8859-1"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+
+This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
+
+A message that you have sent could not be delivered to one or more
+recipients.  This is a permanent error.  The following address failed:
+
+  <kijitora@example.co.jp>: 550 unknown user
+<kijitora@example.co.jp>
+
+
+
+Included is a copy of the message header:
+-----------------------------------------
+Received: from unknown [192.0.2.12] (EHLO mx4145.example.org)
+    by 00000000.mxlogic.net (mxl_mta-5.5.0-3) with ESMTP id
+    00000000.0000000000.000000.00-000.00000000.mxlogic.net (envelope-from
+    <shironeko@mx4145.example.org>);
+    Thu, 29 Apr 2009 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
+Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
+    by mx4145.example.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00000000000
+    for <shironeko@example.co.jp>; Thu, 29 Apr 2009 23:34:45 +0900 (JST)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+From: shironeko@mx4145.example.org
+To: kijitora@example.co.jp
+Message-ID: <0000.0000000000000000@mx4145.example.org>
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2009 23:34:45 +0900
+Precedence: bulk
+Sender: shironeko@mx4145.example.org
+Errors-To: shironeko@mx4145.example.org
+Subject: Nyaaaan
+
+Nyaaaan

data/set-of-emails/maildir/bsd/notes-01.eml

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+Return-Path: <>
+Received: from mx4.g5.example.co.jp (relay.example.co.jp [192.0.2.45])
+    by mx.example.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0000000000
+    for <shironeko@example.jp>; Thu, 29 Apr 2009 23:45:14 +0900 (JST)
+Received: from unknown [192.0.2.41] 
+    by smtp-gw5.example.co.jp with ESMTP id 00000000;
+    Thu, 29 Apr 2009 23:45:07 +0900
+From: postmaster@n.example.co.jp
+To: shironeko@example.jp
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:50 +0900
+Subject: Undeliverable message
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
+Message-Id: <20090429000000.0000000000@smtp-gw5.example.co.jp>
+
+------- Failure Reasons  --------
+
+$B%(%i!<(B($B%F%9%H%a%C%;!<%8$H$7$F$N(B)
+kijitora@u1.example.co.jp
+
+------- Returned Message --------
+Received: from smtp-gw7.example.co.jp ([192.0.2.89]) 
+    by n.example.co.jp (Lotus SMTP MTA Internal build v1.2 hotfix4 (684.3 7-31-1998)) 
+    with SMTP id 00000000.00000000; Thu, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:29 +0900
+Received: from unknown [192.0.2.8] 
+         by smtp-gw7.example.co.jp with ESMTP id 00000000;
+         Thu, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:21 +0900
+Received: from unknown (HELO mail4.example.co.jp) (192.0.2.123)
+  by 0 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2009 01:23:49 -0000
+Message-ID: <000000000.0000000000000.notes@example.co.jp>
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2009 01:23:49 +0900 (JST)
+From: "Shironeko, Nyanko" <shironeko@example.jp>
+Reply-To: postmaster@example.co.jp
+To: kijitora@example.co.jp
+Subject: Nyaaaaaaan
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
+
+Nyaaan
+

data/set-of-emails/maildir/bsd/notes-02.eml

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+Return-Path: <>
+Received: from mx4.g5.example.co.jp (relay.example.co.jp [192.0.2.45])
+    by mx.example.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0000000000
+    for <shironeko@example.jp>; Thu, 29 Apr 2009 23:45:14 +0900 (JST)
+Received: from unknown [192.0.2.41] 
+    by smtp-gw5.example.co.jp with ESMTP id 00000000;
+    Thu, 29 Apr 2009 23:45:07 +0900
+From: postmaster@n.example.co.jp
+To: shironeko@example.jp
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:50 +0900
+Subject: Undeliverable message
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
+Message-Id: <20090429000000.0000000000@smtp-gw5.example.co.jp>
+
+------- Failure Reasons  --------
+
+$B%G%#%l%/%H%j$N%j%9%H$K$"$j$^$;$s(B
+kijitora@u1.example.co.jp
+
+------- Returned Message --------
+Received: from smtp-gw7.example.co.jp ([192.0.2.89]) 
+    by n.example.co.jp (Lotus SMTP MTA Internal build v1.2 hotfix4 (684.3 7-31-1998)) 
+    with SMTP id 00000000.00000000; Thu, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:29 +0900
+Received: from unknown [192.0.2.8] 
+         by smtp-gw7.example.co.jp with ESMTP id 00000000;
+         Thu, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:21 +0900
+Received: from unknown (HELO mail4.example.co.jp) (192.0.2.123)
+  by 0 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2009 01:23:49 -0000
+Message-ID: <000000000.0000000000000.notes@example.co.jp>
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2009 01:23:49 +0900 (JST)
+Reply-To: postmaster@example.co.jp
+To: kijitora@example.co.jp
+Subject: Nyaaaaaaan
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
+From: "Shironeko, Nyanko" <shironeko@example.jp>
+
+Nyaaan
+

data/set-of-emails/maildir/bsd/notes-03.eml

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+Return-Path: <>
+Received: from mx451.example.co.jp ([192.0.2.145])
+    by smtp-gw5601.g1.example.ne.jp (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2
+    release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-00000000000000000) with ESMTP
+    id 0000000 for <shironeko@example.com>;
+    Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:45:10 +0900
+Received: from smtp-gw1.example.com (c135.example.com [192.0.2.98] 
+    (may be forged)) by mx451.example.co.jp with SMTP id 00000000
+    for <shironeko@example.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:45:10 +0900 (JST)
+Message-Id: <199904290000.00000000@mx451.example.co.jp>
+From: POSTMASTER@smtp-gw6-01.example.com
+To: shironeko@example.com
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:45:00 +0900
+Subject: Undeliverable message
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+
+------- Failure Reasons  --------
+
+User  not listed in public Name & Address Book
+kijitora@example.com
+
+
+------- Returned Message --------
+Received: from mx450.example.co.jp ([192.0.2.231]) by 
+    smtp-gw6.example.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.1
+    (569.2 2-6-1999)) with SMTP id 00000000.00000000;
+    Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:45:00 +0900
+Received: from mx8.example.or.jp ([192.0.2.190]) by mx450.example.co.jp 
+    with SMTP id 00000000 for <kijitora@example.com>;
+    Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:45:00 +0900 (JST)
+From: shironeko@example.com
+Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:45:00 +0900
+Message-Id: <0000000000.0000000@mx12.example.or.jp>
+To: shironeko@example.com
+Subject: Nyaaaan
+
+Nyaan

data/set-of-emails/maildir/bsd/notes-04.eml

@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+Envelope-to: suresh-psnYtti16QOsTnJN9+BGXg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+From: POSTMASTER-/jvYeOepKfFWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+To: india-gii-admin-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:45:49 +0530
+Subject: Undeliverable message
+Sender: india-gii-owner-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+X-BeenThere: india-gii-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
+List-Help: 
+<mailto:india-gii-request-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
+List-Post: <mailto:india-gii-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+List-Subscribe: <https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii>,
+
+<mailto:india-gii-request-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
+List-Id: India's bumpy progress on the global infohighway <india-gii.lists.cpsr.org> 
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii>,
+
+<mailto:india-gii-request-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <https://ssl.cpsr.org/pipermail/india-gii/>
+
+------- Failure Reasons --------
+
+Message has exceeded maximum hop count
+
+------- Returned Message --------
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.00171B13; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:42:22 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 3B2AD23B4D; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:31:20 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.00171396; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:42:04 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id B037A23B48; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:31:02 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.00170CDA; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:41:46 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 0432523B40; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:30:45 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.00170A80; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:41:41 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 4D42423B4A; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:30:39 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.00170372; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:41:22 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 4F37B23B48; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:30:21 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.0016FC43; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:41:03 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 45D2523B47; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:30:02 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.0016F473; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:40:43 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 8500623B40; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:29:42 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.0016EDD5; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:40:26 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id C6DE523B3D; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:29:24 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.0016DD90; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:39:45 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 1467123B48; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:28:44 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.0016DAAE; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:39:37 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 06DC123B46; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:28:37 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net ([202.144.10.26]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.0016C70C; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:38:47 +0530 
+Received: from Sifycorp.com (maalnsmtp [202.144.1.2])
+by mailrelayinfo.maa.sify.net (Postfix) with SMTP
+id 9ED1023B3D; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:27:46 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from relayhost.satyam.net.in ([202.144.12.43]) by Sifycorp.com (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) with SMTP id 65256CD9.0016BF58; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:38:27 +0530 
+Received: from la.mutualaid.org (la.mutualaid.org [64.81.32.223])
+by relayhost.satyam.net.in (Relay) with ESMTP
+id 1F1DD46B39; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:08:57 +0530 (IST)
+Received: from trout.cpsr.org (trout.cpsr.org [66.180.229.5])
+by la.mutualaid.org (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h1Q3Sx37083964;
+Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:28:59 -0800 (PST)
+(envelope-from india-gii-admin-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
+Received: from trout.cpsr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+by trout.cpsr.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1Q3Lbj94321;
+Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:21:37 -0800 (PST)
+(envelope-from india-gii-admin-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
+Received: from la.mutualaid.org (la.mutualaid.org [64.81.32.223])
+by trout.cpsr.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1Q3Esj94226
+for <india-gii-oOvZX6Rv2P8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:14:54 
+-0800 (PST)
+(envelope-from arunlists-s8PdfxpoPdHk1uMJSBkQmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
+Received: from jive.SoftHome.net (jive.SoftHome.net [66.54.152.27])
+by la.mutualaid.org (8.12.6/8.12.3) with SMTP id h1Q3ME37083904
+for <india-gii-oOvZX6Rv2P8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:22:14 
+-0800 (PST)
+(envelope-from arunlists-s8PdfxpoPdHk1uMJSBkQmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
+Received: (qmail 21955 invoked by uid 417); 26 Feb 2003 03:22:14 -0000
+Received: from shunt-smtp-out-0 (HELO softhome.net) (172.16.3.12)
+by shunt-smtp-out-0 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 03:22:14 -0000
+Received: from arun.softhome.net ([203.122.12.70])
+(AUTH: LOGIN arunlists-s8PdfxpoPdHk1uMJSBkQmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
+by softhome.net with esmtp; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:22:12 -0700
+Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20030226085040.02168b38-vwZBVSELaeYwFRS6ZYgwDkEOCMrvLtNR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+X-Sender: arunlists-thdp9eUoNiTEgMhPPahe7A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
+To: India Gii <india-gii-oOvZX6Rv2P8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+From: Arun Mehta <arunlists-s8PdfxpoPdHk1uMJSBkQmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+Mime-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Subject: [india-gii] Nasscom study
+Sender: india-gii-admin-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+Errors-To: india-gii-admin-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+X-BeenThere: india-gii-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
+Precedence: bulk
+List-Help: 
+<mailto:india-gii-request-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
+List-Post: <mailto:india-gii-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+List-Subscribe: <https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii>,
+
+<mailto:india-gii-request-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
+List-Id: India's bumpy progress on the global infohighway <india-gii.lists.cpsr.org> 
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii>,
+
+<mailto:india-gii-request-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <https://ssl.cpsr.org/pipermail/india-gii/>
+Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:57:32 +0530
+
+Has anyone a copy of the study? I'm particularly interested in what they
+say about improving IT manpower.
+Arun
+http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?artid=38554664
+
+>ICT sector growing at a healthy rate: Nasscom
+>
+>The software export sector logged in an annual growth of around 30 per
+>cent, an impressive performance by all counts. India's software exports
+>accounted for around 20.4 per cent of the country's overall export
+>revenues during 2002-03.
+>While software services continued to display momentum and grow at a
+>healthy 26 per cent, it was the newly emerging, IT-enabled services/BPO
+>(Business Processing Outsourcing) segment that truly stole the show during
+>the year. This market, earmarked to be a "hot" business opportunity for
+>the future, grew at over 60 per cent, becoming in the process the most
+>significant driver for the software exports industry. The amazing
+>performance logged in by the companies operating in this space, reversed
+>many expected trends and global forecasts.
+>...
+>Revenues from ITES exports skyrocketed from Rs 7,100 crore in 2001-02 to
+>Rs 11,700 crore during 2002-03, placing the segment among the sunrise
+>markets within the Indian ICT domain. The performance of the ITES/BPO
+>industry appears to be in line with the forecasts put forth by
+>Nasscom-McKinsey, which claim that this sector will be worth $21-24
+>billion by 2008 and will employ over 1.1 million Indians.
+>...
+>A separate and detailed analysis has been provided on the animation
+>industry, which is experiencing significant activity on the Indian side
+>and is expected to generate substantial export revenues in the years to
+>come. A number of animation studios are already dotting the Indian
+>landscape and major organisations in the US are outsourcing animation
+>projects to these entities. India's unmatched price/performance, skill-set
+>and quality proposition is drawing foreign companies to come for their
+>animation work to the country.
+>...
+>While the Indian ICT export market has continued to display momentum, the
+>home market has remained sluggish. Growth in this sector in fact dropped
+>from 18 per cent during 2001-02 to 13 per cent in 2002-03. Lowered IT
+>spend by corporates during 2002-03 and a reduction in IT buying by
+>traditionally strong markets such as finance, insurance and banking, lead
+>to this overall slowdown.
+
+
+___________________________
+Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR)
+is the oldest non-profit, mass membership organization
+working on social impacts of computer technology.
+
+To learn more, go to http://www.cpsr.org
+
+To join, use http://cpsr.org/membership
+_________________________
+india-gii mailing list
+india-gii-exipcMZXGhH9nmKIgjYY/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/india-gii
+