RubyGems - simple_token_authentication - Versions diffs - 1.0.0.beta.5 - Mend

simple_token_authentication 1.0.0.beta.5

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (128) hide show

data/test/dummy/public/404.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+  <title>The page you were looking for doesn't exist (404)</title>
+  <style>
+  body {
+    background-color: #EFEFEF;
+    color: #2E2F30;
+    text-align: center;
+    font-family: arial, sans-serif;
+  }
+  div.dialog {
+    width: 25em;
+    margin: 4em auto 0 auto;
+    border: 1px solid #CCC;
+    border-right-color: #999;
+    border-left-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-color: #BBB;
+    border-top: #B00100 solid 4px;
+    border-top-left-radius: 9px;
+    border-top-right-radius: 9px;
+    background-color: white;
+    padding: 7px 4em 0 4em;
+  }
+  h1 {
+    font-size: 100%;
+    color: #730E15;
+    line-height: 1.5em;
+  }
+  body > p {
+    width: 33em;
+    margin: 0 auto 1em;
+    padding: 1em 0;
+    background-color: #F7F7F7;
+    border: 1px solid #CCC;
+    border-right-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-left-radius: 4px;
+    border-bottom-right-radius: 4px;
+    border-top-color: #DADADA;
+    color: #666;
+    box-shadow:0 3px 8px rgba(50, 50, 50, 0.17);
+  }
+  </style>
+</head>
+<body>
+  <!-- This file lives in public/404.html -->
+  <div class="dialog">
+    <h1>The page you were looking for doesn't exist.</h1>
+    <p>You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved.</p>
+  </div>
+  <p>If you are the application owner check the logs for more information.</p>
+</body>
+</html>

data/test/dummy/public/422.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+  <title>The change you wanted was rejected (422)</title>
+  <style>
+  body {
+    background-color: #EFEFEF;
+    color: #2E2F30;
+    text-align: center;
+    font-family: arial, sans-serif;
+  }
+  div.dialog {
+    width: 25em;
+    margin: 4em auto 0 auto;
+    border: 1px solid #CCC;
+    border-right-color: #999;
+    border-left-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-color: #BBB;
+    border-top: #B00100 solid 4px;
+    border-top-left-radius: 9px;
+    border-top-right-radius: 9px;
+    background-color: white;
+    padding: 7px 4em 0 4em;
+  }
+  h1 {
+    font-size: 100%;
+    color: #730E15;
+    line-height: 1.5em;
+  }
+  body > p {
+    width: 33em;
+    margin: 0 auto 1em;
+    padding: 1em 0;
+    background-color: #F7F7F7;
+    border: 1px solid #CCC;
+    border-right-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-left-radius: 4px;
+    border-bottom-right-radius: 4px;
+    border-top-color: #DADADA;
+    color: #666;
+    box-shadow:0 3px 8px rgba(50, 50, 50, 0.17);
+  }
+  </style>
+</head>
+<body>
+  <!-- This file lives in public/422.html -->
+  <div class="dialog">
+    <h1>The change you wanted was rejected.</h1>
+    <p>Maybe you tried to change something you didn't have access to.</p>
+  </div>
+  <p>If you are the application owner check the logs for more information.</p>
+</body>
+</html>

data/test/dummy/public/500.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+  <title>We're sorry, but something went wrong (500)</title>
+  <style>
+  body {
+    background-color: #EFEFEF;
+    color: #2E2F30;
+    text-align: center;
+    font-family: arial, sans-serif;
+  }
+  div.dialog {
+    width: 25em;
+    margin: 4em auto 0 auto;
+    border: 1px solid #CCC;
+    border-right-color: #999;
+    border-left-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-color: #BBB;
+    border-top: #B00100 solid 4px;
+    border-top-left-radius: 9px;
+    border-top-right-radius: 9px;
+    background-color: white;
+    padding: 7px 4em 0 4em;
+  }
+  h1 {
+    font-size: 100%;
+    color: #730E15;
+    line-height: 1.5em;
+  }
+  body > p {
+    width: 33em;
+    margin: 0 auto 1em;
+    padding: 1em 0;
+    background-color: #F7F7F7;
+    border: 1px solid #CCC;
+    border-right-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-color: #999;
+    border-bottom-left-radius: 4px;
+    border-bottom-right-radius: 4px;
+    border-top-color: #DADADA;
+    color: #666;
+    box-shadow:0 3px 8px rgba(50, 50, 50, 0.17);
+  }
+  </style>
+</head>
+<body>
+  <!-- This file lives in public/500.html -->
+  <div class="dialog">
+    <h1>We're sorry, but something went wrong.</h1>
+  </div>
+  <p>If you are the application owner check the logs for more information.</p>
+</body>
+</html>

data/test/dummy/public/favicon.ico ADDED Viewed

File without changes

data/test/dummy/spec/controllers/posts_controller_spec.rb ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+# This spec was generated by rspec-rails when you ran the scaffold generator.
+# It demonstrates how one might use RSpec to specify the controller code that
+# was generated by Rails when you ran the scaffold generator.
+#
+# It assumes that the implementation code is generated by the rails scaffold
+# generator.  If you are using any extension libraries to generate different
+# controller code, this generated spec may or may not pass.
+#
+# It only uses APIs available in rails and/or rspec-rails.  There are a number
+# of tools you can use to make these specs even more expressive, but we're
+# sticking to rails and rspec-rails APIs to keep things simple and stable.
+#
+# Compared to earlier versions of this generator, there is very limited use of
+# stubs and message expectations in this spec.  Stubs are only used when there
+# is no simpler way to get a handle on the object needed for the example.
+# Message expectations are only used when there is no simpler way to specify
+# that an instance is receiving a specific message.
+describe PostsController do
+  # This should return the minimal set of attributes required to create a valid
+  # Post. As you add validations to Post, be sure to
+  # adjust the attributes here as well.
+  let(:valid_attributes)   { FactoryGirl.attributes_for(:post) }
+  let(:invalid_attributes) { FactoryGirl.attributes_for(:invalid_post) }
+  # This should return the minimal set of values that should be in the session
+  # in order to pass any filters (e.g. authentication) defined in
+  # PostsController. Be sure to keep this updated too.
+  let(:valid_session) { {} }
+  describe "GET index" do
+    it "assigns all posts as @posts" do
+      post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+      get :index, {}, valid_session
+      assigns(:posts).should eq([post])
+    end
+  end
+  describe "GET show" do
+    it "assigns the requested post as @post" do
+      post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+      get :show, {:id => post.to_param}, valid_session
+      assigns(:post).should eq(post)
+    end
+  end
+  describe "GET new" do
+    it "assigns a new post as @post" do
+      get :new, {}, valid_session
+      assigns(:post).should be_a_new(Post)
+    end
+  end
+  describe "GET edit" do
+    it "assigns the requested post as @post" do
+      post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+      get :edit, {:id => post.to_param}, valid_session
+      assigns(:post).should eq(post)
+    end
+  end
+  describe "POST create" do
+    describe "with valid params" do
+      it "creates a new Post" do
+        expect {
+          post :create, {:post => valid_attributes}, valid_session
+        }.to change(Post, :count).by(1)
+      end
+      it "assigns a newly created post as @post" do
+        post :create, {:post => valid_attributes}, valid_session
+        assigns(:post).should be_a(Post)
+        assigns(:post).should be_persisted
+      end
+      it "redirects to the created post" do
+        post :create, {:post => valid_attributes}, valid_session
+        response.should redirect_to(Post.last)
+      end
+    end
+    describe "with invalid params" do
+      it "assigns a newly created but unsaved post as @post" do
+        # Trigger the behavior that occurs when invalid params are submitted
+        Post.any_instance.stub(:save).and_return(false)
+        post :create, {:post => invalid_attributes}, valid_session
+        assigns(:post).should be_a_new(Post)
+      end
+      it "re-renders the 'new' template" do
+        # Trigger the behavior that occurs when invalid params are submitted
+        Post.any_instance.stub(:save).and_return(false)
+        post :create, {:post => invalid_attributes}, valid_session
+        response.should render_template("new")
+      end
+    end
+  end
+  describe "PUT update" do
+    describe "with valid params" do
+      it "updates the requested post" do
+        post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+        # Assuming there are no other posts in the database, this
+        # specifies that the Post created on the previous line
+        # receives the :update_attributes message with whatever params are
+        # submitted in the request.
+        Post.any_instance.should_receive(:update).with({ "title" => "MyString" })
+        put :update, {:id => post.to_param, :post => { "title" => "MyString" }}, valid_session
+      end
+      it "assigns the requested post as @post" do
+        post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+        put :update, {:id => post.to_param, :post => valid_attributes}, valid_session
+        assigns(:post).should eq(post)
+      end
+      it "redirects to the post" do
+        post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+        put :update, {:id => post.to_param, :post => valid_attributes}, valid_session
+        response.should redirect_to(post)
+      end
+    end
+    describe "with invalid params" do
+      it "assigns the post as @post" do
+        post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+        # Trigger the behavior that occurs when invalid params are submitted
+        Post.any_instance.stub(:save).and_return(false)
+        put :update, {:id => post.to_param, :post => invalid_attributes}, valid_session
+        assigns(:post).should eq(post)
+      end
+      it "re-renders the 'edit' template" do
+        post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+        # Trigger the behavior that occurs when invalid params are submitted
+        Post.any_instance.stub(:save).and_return(false)
+        put :update, {:id => post.to_param, :post => invalid_attributes}, valid_session
+        response.should render_template("edit")
+      end
+    end
+  end
+  describe "DELETE destroy" do
+    it "destroys the requested post" do
+      post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+      expect {
+        delete :destroy, {:id => post.to_param}, valid_session
+      }.to change(Post, :count).by(-1)
+    end
+    it "redirects to the posts list" do
+      post = Post.create! valid_attributes
+      delete :destroy, {:id => post.to_param}, valid_session
+      response.should redirect_to(posts_url)
+    end
+  end
+end

data/test/dummy/spec/controllers/private_posts_controller_spec.rb ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+# This spec was generated by rspec-rails when you ran the scaffold generator.
+# It demonstrates how one might use RSpec to specify the controller code that
+# was generated by Rails when you ran the scaffold generator.
+#
+# It assumes that the implementation code is generated by the rails scaffold
+# generator.  If you are using any extension libraries to generate different
+# controller code, this generated spec may or may not pass.
+#
+# It only uses APIs available in rails and/or rspec-rails.  There are a number
+# of tools you can use to make these specs even more expressive, but we're
+# sticking to rails and rspec-rails APIs to keep things simple and stable.
+#
+# Compared to earlier versions of this generator, there is very limited use of
+# stubs and message expectations in this spec.  Stubs are only used when there
+# is no simpler way to get a handle on the object needed for the example.
+# Message expectations are only used when there is no simpler way to specify
+# that an instance is receiving a specific message.
+describe PrivatePostsController do
+  # This should return the minimal set of attributes required to create a valid
+  # PrivatePost. As you add validations to PrivatePost, be sure to
+  # adjust the attributes here as well.
+  let(:valid_attributes)   { FactoryGirl.attributes_for(:private_post) }
+  let(:invalid_attributes) { FactoryGirl.attributes_for(:invalid_private_post) }
+  # This should return the minimal set of values that should be in the session
+  # in order to pass any filters (e.g. authentication) defined in
+  # PrivatePostsController. Be sure to keep this updated too.
+  let(:valid_session) { {} }
+  describe "actions" do
+    it "all require authentication" do
+      # That's true for all actions, yet I think there's no need to repeat them all here.
+      lambda { get :index, {}, valid_session }.should raise_exception(RuntimeError)
+      lambda { get :new, {}, valid_session }.should raise_exception(RuntimeError)
+    end
+  end
+end

data/test/dummy/spec/factories/posts.rb ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# Read about factories at https://github.com/thoughtbot/factory_girl
+FactoryGirl.define do
+  factory :post do
+    title "Gems testing with RSpec and Cucumber"
+  end
+  factory :invalid_post, class: :post do
+    body "TODO"
+  end
+end

data/test/dummy/spec/factories/private_posts.rb ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# Read about factories at https://github.com/thoughtbot/factory_girl
+FactoryGirl.define do
+  factory :private_post do
+    title "Secret spaghetti recipe"
+  end
+  factory :invalid_private_post, class: :private_post do
+    body "TODO"
+  end
+end

data/test/dummy/spec/helpers/posts_helper_spec.rb ADDED Viewed

File without changes

data/test/dummy/spec/helpers/private_posts_helper_spec.rb ADDED Viewed

File without changes

data/test/dummy/spec/models/post_spec.rb ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+describe Post do
+  # attributes
+  it "has a title" do
+    should respond_to :title
+  end
+  it "has a body" do
+    should respond_to :body
+  end
+  it "has a state" do
+    should respond_to :published
+  end
+  # associations
+  # Uncomment if your model has associations.
+  # See https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda
+  #
+  # it "belongs to a 'model'" do
+  #   should belong_to :model
+  # end
+  # validations
+  # See https://github.com/thoughtbot/factory_girl
+  # This factory should only set the REQUIRED attributes.
+  it "has a valid factory" do
+    FactoryGirl.build(:post).should be_valid
+  end
+  #
+  # Uncomment if your model has required attributes.
+  # This factory should set no attributes and is useful when invalid
+  # attributes or objects are required.
+  # See FactoryGirl.attributes_for() documentation
+  #
+  it "has an invalid factory" do
+    FactoryGirl.build(:invalid_post).should_not be_valid
+  end
+  # Uncomment if your model has required attributes
+  #
+  # This is the BDD way of testing attributes presence validation
+  # See https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/model-specs/errors-on
+  #
+  # it "fails validation with no 'attribute'" do
+  #   expect(Post.new).to have(1).error_on(:attribute)
+  # end
+  #
+  # And this is an alternative way, which takes advantage of factories,
+  # it's up to you to chose one, the other, or use both together.
+  #
+  it "requires a 'title'" do
+    FactoryGirl.build(:post, title: "").should_not be_valid
+  end
+  # methods
+  # Describe here you model methods behaviour.
+end