simple-client 0.0.2

data/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.9.2.2/doc/rakefile.rdoc

@@ -0,0 +1,557 @@
+= Rakefile Format (as of version 0.8.7)
+
+First of all, there is no special format for a Rakefile.  A Rakefile
+contains executable Ruby code.  Anything legal in a ruby script is
+allowed in a Rakefile.
+
+Now that we understand there is no special syntax in a Rakefile, there
+are some conventions that are used in a Rakefile that are a little
+unusual in a typical Ruby program.  Since a Rakefile is tailored to
+specifying tasks and actions, the idioms used in a Rakefile are
+designed to support that.
+
+So, what goes into a Rakefile?
+
+== Tasks
+
+Tasks are the main unit of work in a Rakefile.  Tasks have a name
+(usually given as a symbol or a string), a list of prerequisites (more
+symbols or strings) and a list of actions (given as a block).
+
+=== Simple Tasks
+
+A task is declared by using the +task+ method.  +task+ takes a single
+parameter that is the name of the task.
+
+  task :name
+
+=== Tasks with Prerequisites
+
+Any prerequisites are given as a list (enclosed in square brackets)
+following the name and an arrow (=>).
+
+  task :name => [:prereq1, :prereq2]
+
+<b>NOTE:</b> Although this syntax looks a little funky, it is legal
+Ruby.  We are constructing a hash where the key is :name and the value
+for that key is the list of prerequisites.  It is equivalent to the
+following ...
+
+  hash = Hash.new
+  hash[:name] = [:prereq1, :prereq2]
+  task(hash)
+
+=== Tasks with Actions
+
+Actions are defined by passing a block to the +task+ method.  Any Ruby
+code can be placed in the block.  The block may reference the task
+object via the block parameter.
+
+  task :name => [:prereq1, :prereq2] do |t|
+    # actions (may reference t)
+  end
+
+=== Multiple Definitions
+
+A task may be specified more than once.  Each specification adds its
+prerequisites and actions to the existing definition.  This allows one
+part of a rakefile to specify the actions and a different rakefile
+(perhaps separately generated) to specify the dependencies.
+
+For example, the following is equivalent to the single task
+specification given above.
+
+  task :name
+  task :name => [:prereq1]
+  task :name => [:prereq2]
+  task :name do |t|
+    # actions
+  end
+
+== File Tasks
+
+Some tasks are designed to create a file from one or more other files.
+Tasks that generate these files may be skipped if the file already
+exists.  File tasks are used to specify file creation tasks.
+
+File tasks are declared using the +file+ method (instead of the +task+
+method).  In addition, file tasks are usually named with a string
+rather than a symbol.
+
+The following file task creates a executable program (named +prog+)
+given two object files name <tt>a.o</tt> and <tt>b.o</tt>.  The tasks
+for creating <tt>a.o</tt> and <tt>b.o</tt> are not shown.
+
+  file "prog" => ["a.o", "b.o"] do |t|
+    sh "cc -o #{t.name} #{t.prerequisites.join(' ')}"
+  end
+
+== Directory Tasks
+
+It is common to need to create directories upon demand.  The
++directory+ convenience method is a short-hand for creating a FileTask
+that creates the directory.  For example, the following declaration
+...
+
+  directory "testdata/examples/doc"
+
+is equivalent to ...
+
+  file "testdata"              do |t| mkdir t.name end
+  file "testdata/examples"     do |t| mkdir t.name end
+  file "testdata/examples/doc" do |t| mkdir t.name end
+
+The +directory+ method does not accept prerequisites or actions, but
+both prerequisites and actions can be added later.  For example ...
+
+  directory "testdata"
+  file "testdata" => ["otherdata"]
+  file "testdata" do
+    cp Dir["standard_data/*.data"], "testdata"
+  end
+
+== Tasks with Parallel Prerequisites
+
+Rake allows parallel execution of prerequisites using the following syntax:
+
+  multitask :copy_files => [:copy_src, :copy_doc, :copy_bin] do
+    puts "All Copies Complete"
+  end
+
+In this example, +copy_files+ is a normal rake task.  Its actions are
+executed whenever all of its prerequisites are done.  The big
+difference is that the prerequisites (+copy_src+, +copy_bin+ and
++copy_doc+) are executed in parallel.  Each of the prerequisites are
+run in their own Ruby thread, possibly allowing faster overall runtime.
+
+=== Secondary Prerequisites
+
+If any of the primary prerequisites of a multitask have common secondary
+prerequisites, all of the primary/parallel prerequisites will wait
+until the common prerequisites have been run.
+
+For example, if the <tt>copy_<em>xxx</em></tt> tasks have the
+following prerequisites:
+
+  task :copy_src => [:prep_for_copy]
+  task :copy_bin => [:prep_for_copy]
+  task :copy_doc => [:prep_for_copy]
+
+Then the +prep_for_copy+ task is run before starting all the copies in
+parallel.  Once +prep_for_copy+ is complete, +copy_src+, +copy_bin+,
+and +copy_doc+ are all run in parallel.  Note that +prep_for_copy+ is
+run only once, even though it is referenced in multiple threads.
+
+=== Thread Safety
+
+The Rake internal data structures are thread-safe with respect
+to the multitask parallel execution, so there is no need for the user
+to do extra synchronization for Rake's benefit.  However, if there are
+user data structures shared between the parallel prerequisites, the
+user must do whatever is necessary to prevent race conditions.
+
+== Tasks with Arguments
+
+Prior to version 0.8.0, rake was only able to handle command line
+arguments of the form NAME=VALUE that were passed into Rake via the
+ENV hash.  Many folks had asked for some kind of simple command line
+arguments, perhaps using "--" to separate regular task names from
+argument values on the command line.  The problem is that there was no
+easy way to associate positional arguments on the command line with
+different tasks.  Suppose both tasks :a and :b expect a command line
+argument: does the first value go with :a?  What if :b is run first?
+Should it then get the first command line argument.
+
+Rake 0.8.0 solves this problem by explicitly passing values directly
+to the tasks that need them.  For example, if I had a release task
+that required a version number, I could say:
+
+   rake release[0.8.2]
+
+And the string "0.8.2" will be passed to the :release task.  Multiple
+arguments can be passed by separating them with a comma, for example:
+
+   rake name[john,doe]
+
+Just a few words of caution.  The rake task name and its arguments
+need to be a single command line argument to rake.  This generally
+means no spaces.  If spaces are needed, then the entire rake +
+argument string should be quoted.  Something like this:
+
+   rake "name[billy bob, smith]"
+
+(Quoting rules vary between operating systems and shells, so make sure
+you consult the proper docs for your OS/shell).
+
+=== Tasks Arguments and the Environment
+
+Task argument values can also be picked up from the environment.  For
+example, if the "release" task expected a parameter named
+"release_version", then either
+
+   rake release[0.8.2]
+
+or
+
+   RELEASE_VERSION rake release
+
+will work.  Environment variable names must either match the task
+parameter exactly, or match an all-uppercase version of the task
+parameter.
+
+=== Tasks that Expect Parameters
+
+Parameters are only given to tasks that are setup to expect them.  In
+order to handle named parameters, the task declaration syntax for
+tasks has been extended slightly.
+
+For example, a task that needs a first name and last name might be
+declared as:
+
+   task :name, [:first_name, :last_name]
+
+The first argument is still the name of the task (:name in this case).
+The next two arguments are the names of the parameters expected by
+:name in an array (:first_name and :last_name in the example).
+
+To access the values of the parameters, the block defining the task
+behaviour can now accept a second parameter:
+
+   task :name, [:first_name, :last_name] do |t, args|
+     puts "First name is #{args.first_name}"
+     puts "Last  name is #{args.last_name}"
+   end
+
+The first argument of the block "t" is always bound to the current
+task object.  The second argument "args" is an open-struct like object
+that allows access to the task arguments.  Extra command line
+arguments to a task are ignored.  Missing command line arguments are
+picked up from matching environment variables.  If there are no
+matching environment variables, they are given the nil value.
+
+If you wish to specify default values for the arguments, you can use
+the with_defaults method in the task body.  Here is the above example
+where we specify default values for the first and last names:
+
+   task :name, [:first_name, :last_name] do |t, args|
+     args.with_defaults(:first_name => "John", :last_name => "Dough")
+     puts "First name is #{args.first_name}"
+     puts "Last  name is #{args.last_name}"
+   end
+
+=== Tasks that Expect Parameters and Have Prerequisites
+
+Tasks that use parameters have a slightly different format for
+prerequisites.  Use the arrow notation to indicate the prerequisites
+for tasks with arguments.  For example:
+
+   task :name, [:first_name, :last_name] => [:pre_name] do |t, args|
+     args.with_defaults(:first_name => "John", :last_name => "Dough")
+     puts "First name is #{args.first_name}"
+     puts "Last  name is #{args.last_name}"
+   end
+
+=== Deprecated Task Parameters Format
+
+There is an older format for declaring task parameters that omitted
+the task argument array and used the :needs keyword to introduce the
+dependencies.  That format is still supported for compatibility, but
+is not recommended for use.  The older format may be dropped in future
+versions of rake.
+
+== Accessing Task Programmatically
+
+Sometimes it is useful to manipulate tasks programmatically in a
+Rakefile. To find a task object, use the <tt>:[]</tt> operator on the
+<tt>Rake::Task</tt>.
+
+=== Programmatic Task Example
+
+For example, the following Rakefile defines two tasks.  The :doit task
+simply prints a simple "DONE" message.  The :dont class will lookup
+the doit class and remove (clear) all of its prerequisites and
+actions.
+
+   task :doit do
+     puts "DONE"
+   end
+
+   task :dont do
+     Rake::Task[:doit].clear
+   end
+
+Running this example:
+
+  $ rake doit
+  (in /Users/jim/working/git/rake/x)
+  DONE
+  $ rake dont doit
+  (in /Users/jim/working/git/rake/x)
+  $
+
+The ability to programmatically manipulate tasks gives rake very
+powerful meta-programming capabilities w.r.t. task execution, but
+should be used with cation.
+
+== Rules
+
+When a file is named as a prerequisite, but does not have a file task
+defined for it, Rake will attempt to synthesize a task by looking at a
+list of rules supplied in the Rakefile.
+
+Suppose we were trying to invoke task "mycode.o", but no task is
+defined for it.  But the rakefile has a rule that look like this ...
+
+  rule '.o' => ['.c'] do |t|
+    sh "cc #{t.source} -c -o #{t.name}"
+  end
+
+This rule will synthesize any task that ends in ".o".  It has a
+prerequisite a source file with an extension of ".c" must exist.  If
+Rake is able to find a file named "mycode.c", it will automatically
+create a task that builds "mycode.o" from "mycode.c".
+
+If the file "mycode.c" does not exist, rake will attempt
+to recursively synthesize a rule for it.
+
+When a task is synthesized from a rule, the +source+ attribute of the
+task is set to the matching source file.  This allows us to write
+rules with actions that reference the source file.
+
+=== Advanced Rules
+
+Any regular expression may be used as the rule pattern.  Additionally,
+a proc may be used to calculate the name of the source file.  This
+allows for complex patterns and sources.
+
+The following rule is equivalent to the example above.
+
+  rule( /\.o$/ => [
+    proc {|task_name| task_name.sub(/\.[^.]+$/, '.c') }
+  ]) do |t|
+    sh "cc #{t.source} -c -o #{t.name}"
+  end
+
+<b>NOTE:</b> Because of a _quirk_ in Ruby syntax, parenthesis are
+required on *rule* when the first argument is a regular expression.
+
+The following rule might be used for Java files ...
+
+  rule '.java' => [
+    proc { |tn| tn.sub(/\.class$/, '.java').sub(/^classes\//, 'src/') }
+  ] do |t|
+    java_compile(t.source, t.name)
+  end
+
+<b>NOTE:</b> +java_compile+ is a hypothetical method that invokes the
+java compiler.
+
+== Importing Dependencies
+
+Any ruby file (including other rakefiles) can be included with a
+standard Ruby +require+ command.  The rules and declarations in the
+required file are just added to the definitions already accumulated.
+
+Because the files are loaded _before_ the rake targets are evaluated,
+the loaded files must be "ready to go" when the rake command is
+invoked.  This make generated dependency files difficult to use.  By
+the time rake gets around to updating the dependencies file, it is too
+late to load it.
+
+The +Rake.import+ command addresses this by specifying a file to be
+loaded _after_ the main rakefile is loaded, but _before_ any targets
+on the command line are invoked.  In addition, if the file name
+matches an explicit task, that task is invoked before loading the
+file.  This allows dependency files to be generated and used in a
+single rake command invocation.
+
+<b>NOTE:</b> Starting in Rake version 0.9.0, the top level +import+
+command is deprecated and we recommend using the scoped
+"+Rake.import+" command mentioned above.  Future versions of Rake will
+drop support for the top level +import+ command.
+
+=== Example:
+
+  require 'rake/loaders/makefile'
+
+  file ".depends.mf" => [SRC_LIST] do |t|
+    sh "makedepend -f- -- #{CFLAGS} -- #{t.prerequisites} > #{t.name}"
+  end
+
+  Rake.import ".depends.mf"
+
+If ".depends" does not exist, or is out of date w.r.t. the source
+files, a new ".depends" file is generated using +makedepend+ before
+loading.
+
+== Comments
+
+Standard Ruby comments (beginning with "#") can be used anywhere it is
+legal in Ruby source code, including comments for tasks and rules.
+However, if you wish a task to be described using the "-T" switch,
+then you need to use the +desc+ command to describe the task.
+
+=== Example:
+
+  desc "Create a distribution package"
+  task :package => [ ... ] do ... end
+
+The "-T" switch (or "--tasks" if you like to spell things out) will
+display a list of tasks that have a description.  If you use +desc+ to
+describe your major tasks, you have a semi-automatic way of generating
+a summary of your Rake file.
+
+  traken$ rake -T
+  (in /home/.../rake)
+  rake clean            # Remove any temporary products.
+  rake clobber          # Remove any generated file.
+  rake clobber_rdoc     # Remove rdoc products
+  rake contrib_test     # Run tests for contrib_test
+  rake default          # Default Task
+  rake install          # Install the application
+  rake lines            # Count lines in the main rake file
+  rake rdoc             # Build the rdoc HTML Files
+  rake rerdoc           # Force a rebuild of the RDOC files
+  rake test             # Run tests
+  rake testall          # Run all test targets
+
+Only tasks with descriptions will be displayed with the "-T" switch.
+Use "-P" (or "--prereqs") to get a list of all tasks and their
+prerequisites.
+
+== Namespaces
+
+As projects grow (and along with it, the number of tasks), it is
+common for task names to begin to clash.  For example, if you might
+have a main program and a set of sample programs built by a single
+Rakefile.  By placing the tasks related to the main program in one
+namespace, and the tasks for building the sample programs in a
+different namespace, the task names will not will not interfere with
+each other.
+
+For example:
+
+  namespace "main" do
+    task :build do
+      # Build the main program
+    end
+  end
+
+  namespace "samples" do
+    task :build do
+      # Build the sample programs
+    end
+  end
+
+  task :build => ["main:build", "samples:build"]
+
+Referencing a task in a separate namespace can be achieved by
+prefixing the task name with the namespace and a colon
+(e.g. "main:build" refers to the :build task in the +main+ namespace).
+Nested namespaces are supported, so
+
+Note that the name given in the +task+ command is always the unadorned
+task name without any namespace prefixes.  The +task+ command always
+defines a task in the current namespace.
+
+=== FileTasks
+
+File task names are not scoped by the namespace command.  Since the
+name of a file task is the name of an actual file in the file system,
+it makes little sense to include file task names in name space.
+Directory tasks (created by the +directory+ command) are a type of
+file task and are also not affected by namespaces.
+
+=== Name Resolution
+
+When looking up a task name, rake will start with the current
+namespace and attempt to find the name there.  If it fails to find a
+name in the current namespace, it will search the parent namespaces
+until a match is found (or an error occurs if there is no match).
+
+The "rake" namespace is a special implicit namespace that refers to
+the toplevel names.
+
+If a task name begins with a "^" character, the name resolution will
+start in the parent namespace.  Multiple "^" characters are allowed.
+
+Here is an example file with multiple :run tasks and how various names
+resolve in different locations.
+
+  task :run
+
+  namespace "one" do
+    task :run
+
+    namespace "two" do
+      task :run
+
+      # :run            => "one:two:run"
+      # "two:run"       => "one:two:run"
+      # "one:two:run"   => "one:two:run"
+      # "one:run"       => "one:run"
+      # "^run"          => "one:run"
+      # "^^run"         => "rake:run" (the top level task)
+      # "rake:run"      => "rake:run" (the top level task)
+    end
+
+    # :run       => "one:run"
+    # "two:run"  => "one:two:run"
+    # "^run"     => "rake:run"
+  end
+
+  # :run           => "rake:run"
+  # "one:run"      => "one:run"
+  # "one:two:run"  => "one:two:run"
+
+== FileLists
+
+FileLists are the way Rake manages lists of files.  You can treat a
+FileList as an array of strings for the most part, but FileLists
+support some additional operations.
+
+=== Creating a FileList
+
+Creating a file list is easy.  Just give it the list of file names:
+
+   fl = FileList['file1.rb', file2.rb']
+
+Or give it a glob pattern:
+
+   fl = FileList['*.rb']
+
+== Odds and Ends
+
+=== do/end versus { }
+
+Blocks may be specified with either a +do+/+end+ pair, or with curly
+braces in Ruby.  We _strongly_ recommend using +do+/+end+ to specify the
+actions for tasks and rules.  Because the rakefile idiom tends to
+leave off parentheses on the task/file/rule methods, unusual
+ambiguities can arise when using curly braces.
+
+For example, suppose that the method +object_files+ returns a list of
+object files in a project.  Now we use +object_files+ as the
+prerequisites in a rule specified with actions in curly braces.
+
+  # DON'T DO THIS!
+  file "prog" => object_files {
+    # Actions are expected here (but it doesn't work)!
+  }
+
+Because curly braces have a higher precedence than +do+/+end+, the
+block is associated with the +object_files+ method rather than the
++file+ method.
+
+This is the proper way to specify the task ...
+
+  # THIS IS FINE
+  file "prog" => object_files do
+    # Actions go here
+  end
+
+----
+
+== See
+
+* README.rdoc -- Main documentation for Rake.

data/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.9.2.2/doc/rational.rdoc

@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+= Why rake?
+
+Ok, let me state from the beginning that I never intended to write this
+code.  I'm not convinced it is useful, and I'm not convinced anyone
+would even be interested in it.  All I can say is that Why's onion truck
+must by been passing through the Ohio valley.
+
+What am I talking about? ... A Ruby version of Make.
+
+See, I can sense you cringing already, and I agree.  The world certainly
+doesn't need yet another reworking of the "make" program.  I mean, we
+already have "ant".  Isn't that enough?
+
+It started yesterday.  I was helping a coworker fix a problem in one of
+the Makefiles we use in our project.  Not a particularly tough problem,
+but during the course of the conversation I began lamenting some of the
+shortcomings of make.  In particular, in one of my makefiles I wanted to
+determine the name of a file dynamically and had to resort to some
+simple scripting (in Ruby) to make it work.  "Wouldn't it be nice if you
+could just use Ruby inside a Makefile" I said.
+
+My coworker (a recent convert to Ruby) agreed, but wondered what it
+would look like.  So I sketched the following on the whiteboard...
+
+    "What if you could specify the make tasks in Ruby, like this ..."
+
+      task "build" do
+        java_compile(...args, etc ...)
+      end
+
+    "The task function would register "build" as a target to be made,
+    and the block would be the action executed whenever the build
+    system determined that it was time to do the build target."
+
+We agreed that would be cool, but writing make from scratch would be WAY
+too much work.  And that was the end of that!
+
+... Except I couldn't get the thought out of my head.  What exactly
+would be needed to make the about syntax work as a make file?  Hmmm, you
+would need to register the tasks, you need some way of specifying
+dependencies between tasks, and some way of kicking off the process.
+Hey!  What if we did ... and fifteen minutes later I had a working
+prototype of Ruby make, complete with dependencies and actions.
+
+I showed the code to my coworker and we had a good laugh.  It was just
+about a page worth of code that reproduced an amazing amount of the
+functionality of make.  We were both truly stunned with the power of
+Ruby.
+
+But it didn't do everything make did.  In particular, it didn't have
+timestamp based file dependencies (where a file is rebuilt if any of its
+prerequisite files have a later timestamp).  Obviously THAT would be a
+pain to add and so Ruby Make would remain an interesting experiment.
+
+... Except as I walked back to my desk, I started thinking about what
+file based dependencies would really need.  Rats!  I was hooked again,
+and by adding a new class and two new methods, file/timestamp
+dependencies were implemented.
+
+Ok, now I was really hooked.  Last night (during CSI!) I massaged the
+code and cleaned it up a bit.  The result is a bare-bones replacement
+for make in exactly 100 lines of code.
+
+For the curious, you can see it at ...
+* doc/proto_rake.rdoc
+
+Oh, about the name.  When I wrote the example Ruby Make task on my
+whiteboard, my coworker exclaimed "Oh! I have the perfect name: Rake ...
+Get it?  Ruby-Make. Rake!"  He said he envisioned the tasks as leaves
+and Rake would clean them up  ... or something like that.  Anyways, the
+name stuck.
+
+Some quick examples ...
+
+A simple task to delete backup files ...
+
+   task :clean do
+     Dir['*~'].each {|fn| rm fn rescue nil}
+   end
+
+Note that task names are symbols (they are slightly easier to type
+than quoted strings ... but you may use quoted string if you would
+rather). Rake makes the methods of the FileUtils module directly
+available, so we take advantage of the <tt>rm</tt> command.  Also note
+the use of "rescue nil" to trap and ignore errors in the <tt>rm</tt>
+command.
+
+To run it, just type "rake clean".  Rake will automatically find a
+Rakefile in the current directory (or above!) and will invoke the
+targets named on the command line.  If there are no targets explicitly
+named, rake will invoke the task "default".
+
+Here's another task with dependencies ...
+
+   task :clobber => [:clean] do
+     rm_r "tempdir"
+   end
+
+Task :clobber depends upon task :clean, so :clean will be run before
+:clobber is executed.
+
+Files are specified by using the "file" command.  It is similar to the
+task command, except that the task name represents a file, and the task
+will be run only if the file doesn't exist, or if its modification time
+is earlier than any of its prerequisites.
+
+Here is a file based dependency that will compile "hello.cc" to
+"hello.o".
+
+   file "hello.cc"
+   file "hello.o" => ["hello.cc"] do |t|
+     srcfile = t.name.sub(/\.o$/, ".cc")
+     sh %{g++ #{srcfile} -c -o #{t.name}}
+   end
+
+I normally specify file tasks with string (rather than symbols).  Some
+file names can't be represented by symbols.  Plus it makes the
+distinction between them more clear to the casual reader.
+
+Currently writing a task for each and every file in the project would be
+tedious at best.  I envision a set of libraries to make this job
+easier.  For instance, perhaps something like this ...
+
+   require 'rake/ctools'
+   Dir['*.c'].each do |fn|
+     c_source_file(fn)
+   end
+
+where "c_source_file" will create all the tasks need to compile all the
+C source files in a directory.  Any number of useful libraries could be
+created for rake.
+
+That's it.  There's no documentation (other than whats in this
+message).  Does this sound interesting to anyone?  If so, I'll continue
+to clean it up and write it up and publish it on RAA.  Otherwise, I'll
+leave it as an interesting exercise and a tribute to the power of Ruby.
+
+Why /might/ rake be interesting to Ruby programmers.  I don't know,
+perhaps ...
+
+* No weird make syntax (only weird Ruby syntax :-)
+* No need to edit or read XML (a la ant)
+* Platform independent build scripts.
+* Will run anywhere Ruby exists, so no need to have "make" installed.
+  If you stay away from the "sys" command and use things like
+  'ftools', you can have a perfectly platform independent
+  build script.  Also rake is only 100 lines of code, so it can
+  easily be packaged along with the rest of your code.
+
+So ... Sorry for the long rambling message.  Like I said, I never
+intended to write this code at all.