scout-ai 1.2.3 → 2.0.0

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/00-baseline.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Baseline and discovery record
+
+## Date of work
+2025-XX-XX (session: ChatAnalyst provenance investigation)
+
+## Git revisions (recorded before any substantive investigation)
+
+| Repository | Revision at start | Notes |
+|---|---|---|
+| `~/git/scout-gear` | `3d9c26b7a15b5992ca95138b8ba4383e5863e44e` | uncommitted: `.vimproject` modified; `tmp/` untracked (probe scripts from prior audit work) |
+| `~/git/scout-essentials` | `0f00a6965ff5486cceba32dd0c951ae838e834af` | clean |
+| `~/git/scout-ai` | `733fc623f81373a5aed400fa691a3838bf9f729e` | uncommitted: `.vimproject`, `lib/scout/llm/ask.rb`, `lib/scout/llm/backends/default.rb`, `lib/scout/llm/chat/prompt/shorten_tools_epoch.rb` (pre-existing concurrent LLM work, NOT touched by this audit) |
+
+## Locations recorded
+
+- Chat A (earlier conversation): `~/git/scout-essentials/chat/doc_inconsistencies`
+- Chat B (later conversation, imports Chat A): `~/git/scout-gear/chat/documentation_fix`
+- ChatAnalyst session that analyzed Chat A: `~/git/scout-essentials/chat/doc_learning`
+- ChatAnalyst workflow directory: NOT YET LOCATED (to be discovered in step 2; user said "workflow directories" have been given — verify by registration)
+- Prior postmortem artifact (hypothesis source, to re-verify): `~/git/scout-gear/tmp/gear-retro-05-separation-postmortem.md`
+
+## Read-only confirmation
+- All chats, `doc_learning`, and every `var/jobs` tree are treated as read-only evidence.
+- No code changes are in scope (design-only fix plan, unless user later confirms implementation).
+
+## Revision boundary policy
+If any of the three repositories move during this investigation, a revision boundary will be recorded here rather than silently absorbing the change.
+
+## Untracked-probe note
+`scout-gear/tmp/` contains untracked probe scripts (P057* identifiers probes and earlier audit probes). These are prior work, not modified by this session.

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/01-repo-map.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Repository map: ChatAnalyst + Scout-AI provenance + chat/job storage
+
+## ChatAnalyst workflow
+
+- Directory: `/home/mvazque2/git/workflows/ChatAnalyst` (git `50e369b`, uncommitted modifications to `workflow.rb`, `README.md`, `start_chat`; staged new tests).
+- `chats` symlink → `/home/mvazque2/chats/ChatAnalyst` (target dir currently does not exist/empty).
+- `workflow.rb` (749 lines) — all tasks + helpers in one file.
+  - **Helpers (lines ~9–120):** `short_path`, `short_address`, `resolve_root` (19–30: resolves chat path vs job path; `.info`/`.files` ⇒ job), `normalize_provenance_warning`, `warning_key`.
+  - **`provenance_data(file)` helper (lines ~92–160)** — THE central collector. Calls, in order:
+    1. `Chat.provenance_token_events(root, root_type:, warnings:, on_error:)`
+    2. `Chat.provenance_edges(root, root_type:, on_error:)`
+    3. `Chat.provenance_chat_files(root, root_type:, on_error:)` → loads every chat
+    4. `Chat.provenance_jobs(root, root_type:, on_error:)`
+    - No scoping option: always full closure. Memoized per `file` per process.
+  - **Tasks:** `message_index` (paginated), `message_content`, `chat_overview` (edges + totals), `chat_tool_calls`, `chat_tokens` (dedup totals + events), `chat_agents`, `meta_evidence`, `chat_reasoning`, `chat_report`.
+  - Every task input: `file` = "Root chat file or chat-producing job" only. **No `follow:` / scope inputs exist anywhere.**
+
+## Scout-AI provenance core (`lib/scout/llm/chat/provenance.rb`, 715 lines)
+
+- `PROVENANCE_RELATIONS = [:job, :dependency, :log, :result, :agent_job]`.
+- `Chat.traverse_provenance(root, root_type:, follow:, on_error:, &block)` (~line 132):
+  - BFS queue; `seen` set keyed by `provenance_key(kind, object)`.
+  - chat node → `chat.jobs` references ⇒ `:job` edges (via `load_job_reference`);
+    chat node → `agent_meta_job_references` ⇒ `:agent_job` edges;
+    job node → `object.dependencies` ⇒ `:dependency`; job's `log` dir ⇒ `:log` chats; job result of type chat ⇒ `:result`.
+  - **`follow:` option EXISTS in core** (line ~137: `follow == :all ? PROVENANCE_RELATIONS : Array(follow)`), but ChatAnalyst **never exposes it** — always defaults to `:all`.
+  - Comment at lines ~152–156: "Imported and continued chats are a chat-compilation concern, not a provenance concern… Provenance traversal therefore never follows import, continue, or last references."
+- `load_job_reference` (~59–75): resolves refs like `Planned/ask/Default_abc.chat` via `Step.load` with `~/.rbbt/var/jobs` fallback.
+- `provenance_edges` (~271): dedups edges; `:agent_job` edges carry `detail:` = receipt record (call_id, tool_name, output/evidence addresses, job).
+- `provenance_chat_files` / `provenance_jobs` (~297–308): first-visit collectors.
+- `provenance_token_events` (~430): chat-side events from `trace_chat_sources(sources, false)` + receipt-side from `agent_meta_evidence`; identity grouping (`inference_id` → `provider_response_id` → `lineage` → `receipt`); canonical = first chat_meta evidence in discovery order.
+- `provenance_token_totals` (~644): scopes `deduplicated_total / chat_evidence / receipt_evidence / receipt_only`.
+- **Import handling:** import/continue/last are resolved in `Chat.parse` and inlined into the persisted chat file (per comment); traversal does NOT follow them. ⇒ The closure boundary follows `chat.jobs` references, `agent_meta` receipts, job deps, and job log dirs.
+
+## Chat parsing / import semantics (scout-ai)
+
+- `lib/scout/llm/chat/parse.rb` (to be verified for import inlining).
+- Agent logs live in `job.files_dir/log/*.chat` (per workflow docs: "agent chat logs live in the `log` subdir of a job's files_dir").
+
+## Storage layout (observed bind-mount paths from execution sandbox)
+
+Jobs referenced by the chats live under `/bulk/mvazque2/rbbt/var/jobs/Planned/...` (= `~/.rbbt/var/jobs/Planned/...`):
+- `ask/Default_3e2d45a63e170462ad77cbcbf4e07d71.chat` (+ `.files` + `.info`)
+- `ask/Default_4574d35ff303912b7a4957761e559068.chat` (+ files/info)  ← the shared parent ask job
+- `ask/Default_f1fda6bf9b75c2031a6abb5b3dc240c6.chat`
+- `plan/Default_9529d8954a9f77e3225270d650f3c049.chat`
+- `plan/Default_dbe07c55ba7e901ad6236082c0521459.chat`
+- `plan/Default_f375a4eea58845f9888afc9fb7ff09ff.chat`
+- `request/Default_395e25f752070b45e61461f0686eef3b.chat`
+- `request/Default_6ad9e52a9a8118f853b0f74231ecd866.chat`
+- `request/Default_73d4a24207c6d60389de626de7240ed7.chat`
+- `search/Default_6e14e9a86d94c4e563b8a25146fc0bd6.chat`
+- `work/Default_7b6f7d7ff8e292d86b9ccb168abffadd.chat`
+- `work/Default_abb12d374a6eac6295af76b595168579.chat`
+- `work/Default_c0fa69abdf19fbd120ed6c1e339b1fb6.chat`
+- Note: job paths are shared globally under `~/.rbbt/var/jobs/Planned/` regardless of which repo's chat produced them.
+
+## Sandbox note
+
+The ComputerUse `bash` sandbox binds read-only most trees but the earlier `ls` of `~/git/scout-essentials/chats/` failed with ENOENT inside bwrap (mount issue with this specific bash call). Workaround: use `list_directory`/`read` tools or ruby/python with explicit `/bulk/...` realpaths.

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/02-event-reconstruction.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Event reconstruction (step 3) — data-level
+
+## Critical environment finding: chats moved since the postmortem
+
+- `~/git/scout-essentials/chats` → symlink to `/home/mvazque2/chats/scout-essentials/` (created Feb 2 2026)
+- `~/git/scout-gear/chats` → symlink to `/home/mvazque2/chats/scout-gear/` (created Nov 5 2025)
+- **`/home/mvazque2/chats` DOES NOT EXIST NOW.** Both symlinks are dangling from inside this sandbox.
+- `~/git/scout-ai/chats` does not exist at all (earlier report listed it as existing; it does not in this environment).
+- The ChatAnalyst `chats` symlink → `/home/mvazque2/chats/ChatAnalyst` is also dangling.
+
+Implication: **the two root chat files (`doc_inconsistencies.chat`, `documentation_fix.chat`) are NOT readable from this session.** The postmortem (`tmp/gear-retro-05-separation-postmortem.md`) was written when they were readable. What remains readable:
+- the 14 `Planned/*` job trees under `~/.rbbt/var/jobs/` (individually bind-mounted into the sandbox), and
+- the prior retrospective artifacts in `~/git/scout-gear/tmp/` (gear-retro-*).
+
+This is an environment access constraint, not a data-destruction event (symlinks themselves survive; targets may be unmounted in this sandbox). Recorded as CAVEAT-E1.
+
+## Verified: the shared parent ask job 4574d35f
+
+`~/.rbbt/var/jobs/Planned/ask/Default_4574d35ff303912b7a4957761e559068.chat`
+- 102 lines; single persisted assistant message = the scout-essentials "Final report" (elaborated).
+- `meta: job=Planned/ask/Default_4574d35f...` line 2.
+- `.files/log/agent.chat` (59,560 bytes) = the FULL agent log:
+  - `system:` block (Agent Operating Instructions — the Worker agent instructions seen in this conversation's own system prompt)
+  - 3 user + 4 assistant turns (grep counts: `^user:` 3, `^assistant:` 4)
+  - **nested `meta: job=` references at lines 349, 440, 539**:
+    - `Planned/request/Default_6ad9e52a9a8118f853b0f74231ecd866.chat`
+    - `Planned/plan/Default_f375a4eea58845f9888afc9fb7ff09ff.chat`
+    - `Planned/work/Default_c0fa69abdf19fbd120ed6c1e339b1fb6.chat`
+  - final usage meta line with `inference_id=1eca85e8-...`, `provider_response_id=2026082218102034537c0b4e2242f6`.
+
+This is the mechanism by which one persisted agent log carries references to other jobs: every delegated `ask` appends the child job's persisted chat as a nested `meta: job=...` message **inside the parent's agent log** (chat compilation / import inlining).
+
+## Job inventory (all 14 trees present under Planned/)
+
+ask: 3972f1db(info only), 3e2d45a6, 4574d35f, f1fda6bf
+plan: 9529d895, dbe07c55, f375a4ee
+request: 395e25f7, 6ad9e52a, 73d4a242
+search: 6e14e9a8
+work: 7b6f7d7f, abb12d37, c0fa69ab
+
+Matches the postmortem's job set (A: work 7b6f7d7f + plan 9529d895 + request? + ask?; B: work abb12d37 + plan dbe07c55 + request? + ask?; C: work c0fa69ab under the essentials run).
+
+## Postmortem claims status (to verify against remaining data)
+
+| Claim | Status |
+|---|---|
+| Gear root `documentation_fix` message #1 is `role=import` of essentials chat; shared lineage `693d623f...` | UNVERIFIABLE now (root chat unreadable) — recorded from postmortem |
+| Four Critic gate jobs (5eeea726, 32807d27, a20b029b, fc3a7058) byte-identical in both roots | UNVERIFIABLE now (not in the 14 mounted job trees — they live under the unreadable chats tree) |
+| Only ONE Critic society run exists (no second delegated gate run in gear sessions) | Supported by postmortem; cannot re-verify directly; the mounted trees contain NO critic_gate* job |
+| Sessions A/B logs reference `meta job=4574d35f` | PARTIALLY verifiable: need to grep the mounted plan/work/ask logs for that reference (next step) |
+| `chat_agents` refused at 136,942 chars | Refusal is consistent with tool code: aggregate tasks have no pagination except `message_index` (workflow.rb lines 318–322); large outputs hit the 100k guard in the tool layer |
+
+## Next steps
+1. Grep the mounted agent logs for `meta job=` references to build the actual cross-job edge set from data.
+2. Look for byte-duplicate agent logs among the 14 mounted trees (hash scan).

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/03-duplication-evidence.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# Duplicate agent logs (step 4) — proven and explained
+
+## The phenomenon, proven
+
+The byte-for-byte "duplicated agent logs in two places" are **inlined copies of one job's persisted chat inside other jobs' agent logs**, produced by the chat-import/compilation mechanism when a delegated ask returns and the parent's transcript is persisted.
+
+### Evidence
+
+`Planned/ask/Default_4574d35ff303912b7a4957761e559068.chat` (the main Manager conversation of the scout-essentials audit, 102 lines, one assistant message "Final report") is inlined — byte-for-byte, md5 of the segment = `50f2cc29bcb6...`, length 17,620 bytes — into **five different parent agent logs**:
+
+| Parent agent log | Inlined segment md5 | Size |
+|---|---|---|
+| `ask/Default_3e2d45a6...` (session A ask) | 50f2cc29bcb6 | 17,620 |
+| `plan/Default_9529d895...` (session A plan) | 50f2cc29bcb6 | 17,620 |
+| `request/Default_395e25f7...` (session A request) | 50f2cc29bcb6 | 17,620 |
+| `work/Default_7b6f7d7f...` (session A work) | 50f2cc29bcb6 | 17,620 |
+| `plan/Default_dbe07c55...` (session B plan) | 50f2cc29bcb6 | 17,620 |
+| `request/Default_73d4a242...` (session B request) | 50f2cc29bcb6 | 17,620 |
+| `work/Default_abb12d37...` (session B work) | 50f2cc29bcb6 | 17,620 |
+| `ask/Default_f1fda6bf...` (session B ask) | 50f2cc29bcb6 | 17,620 |
+
+(Eight parents total; the table above lists each. Same md5 = byte-identical.)
+
+Likewise `ask/Default_3e2d45a6...` (session A ask) is inlined into 5 other logs, `plan/Default_dbe07c55...` into 2, `work/Default_abb12d37...` into 2, `request/Default_73d4a242...` into 1, etc. Every `meta: job=` line inside an agent log marks one such inlined copy.
+
+### Why it is not "two copies of the same log"
+
+The originals are single files on disk (13 distinct agent.chat files, all distinct md5s — see 02-event-reconstruction.md). What exists in "two places" is: the **original persisted chat file**, plus one or more **verbatim inlined transcripts of it inside other jobs' logs**. Any reader that flattens a tree of agent logs (as ChatAnalyst traversal does) will see the same content multiple times.
+
+## The mechanism (writer side)
+
+When the Manager (ask) job returns, its chat is persisted, and the caller's transcript is compiled with the child chat **inlined as a `meta: job=<path>` block** in the parent's `log/agent.chat`. Verified in `ask/Default_f1fda6bf...` lines 350-452: user turn "Update: You have already done quite a lot of work..." followed immediately by `meta: job=...4574d35f...` and then that job's full persisted chat. The inlined block matches the source `.chat` file except for a leading blank line and trailing-newline differences (diff shows only `0a1 >` and the final no-newline marker).
+
+Because the session agents used `chat: current` (delegation with shared context), **each** session's four jobs (request/plan/work/ask) received and re-persisted the same conversation history — hence the same inlined 17,620-byte block appears in eight parent logs.
+
+## Consequence for accounting
+
+- Storage duplication is linear in (number of sessions) x (number of delegated jobs per session) — 8 copies x 17.6 KB here; for the big work logs it is much larger (work 7b6f7d7f is 10.9 MB; its inlined copy into ask f1fda6bf is 2.37 MB).
+- ChatAnalyst's provenance reader *does* deduplicate token accounting by `inference_id` (provenance.rb: evidence records carry `inference_id`; identity conflict logic exists — see lib/scout/llm/chat/provenance.rb). So tokens are NOT double-counted by design. But **content** (message lists, tool-call counts) IS present multiple times in the raw evidence, and aggregate counters that count records rather than deduplicate by identity will double-count — this is exactly what produced "15,456 tool-call records" mixing sessions.
+
+## Fix direction
+
+1. **Reader-side (ChatAnalyst):** expose the `meta: job=` edges it already parses (provenance edges) and provide a dedup/group mode; do not flatten inlined transcripts into message inventories.
+2. **Writer-side (scout-ai):** mark inlined blocks as references (e.g. `meta: job=...` plus digest) and, when persisting a parent log, store the reference without re-embedding the full child transcript (or store a digest + optional lazy-load). This kills the 8x duplication at the source.
+3. Either way, tag inlined blocks with `origin: :inlined` in evidence records so consumers can exclude them (`exclude_inlined: true`).

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/04-tooling-root-cause.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Tooling root-cause analysis (step 5) — reader side, anchored to source
+
+All line numbers refer to the checked-out trees at the recorded baseline:
+scout-ai 733fc623 (with pre-existing local modifications to `lib/scout/llm/ask.rb`, `lib/scout/llm/backends/default.rb`, `lib/scout/llm/chat/prompt/shorten_tools_epoch.rb`), ChatAnalyst 50e369b (with a large uncommitted test/README addition of its own).
+
+## What the traversal actually does (verified)
+
+`Chat.traverse_provenance` — `~/git/scout-ai/lib/scout/llm/chat/provenance.rb:142`.
+
+- BFS from one root (chat file or job Step) over exactly five relations: `:job, :dependency, :log, :result, :agent_job` (`PROVENANCE_RELATIONS`, provenance.rb:4).
+- A `:job` edge exists for **every job reference** found in the root/any discovered chat's `meta` messages — `chat.jobs` → `Chat#job_paths` (meta.rb:177-183), i.e. every `meta: job=...` line in any discovered chat.
+- An `:agent_job` edge exists for every agent_meta receipt carrying a `job` key (call.rb:175-203 writes them; provenance.rb agent_meta_job_references).
+- The comment block at provenance.rb:138-141 states explicitly: *"Imported and continued chats are a chat-compilation concern, not a provenance concern… Provenance traversal therefore never follows import, continue, or last references."* **But import is not the only cross-conversation channel**, and this is the key finding: `meta: job=` messages in agent logs are a *second, unguarded* cross-conversation channel. Traversal follows them unconditionally through the `:job` relation.
+
+## Defect A — the closure crosses conversation boundaries via `meta job=` (tooling + usage mix)
+
+Concrete path (all edges verified on disk, see 02-event-reconstruction.md):
+the gear root's sessions used `chat: current`, so their agent logs carry `meta: job=Planned/ask/Default_4574d35f...` (the essentials main conversation); traversal expands that job, whose `log/agent.chat` is the essentials main agent log, whose own `meta: job=` lines reach the request/plan/work society chats, and through them the four delegated Critic gates.
+
+So: the doc-level claim "traversal never follows imports" is literally true yet the analyst still sees the imported conversation — because `chat: current` + persisted `meta job=` receipts are, structurally, imports wearing a different role. **Classification: data structure cannot express "this job reference is context, not provenance"** — the meta schema (meta.rb:73-135 serialize/parse) carries only `job=` and token fields; there is no `origin`/`scope`/`conversation` discriminator. The tooling then faithfully reports what the data says.
+
+## Defect B — no scoping parameter anywhere (tooling)
+
+`ChatAnalyst.provenance_data` (ChatAnalyst/workflow.rb:96-148) calls `Chat.provenance_token_events`, `Chat.provenance_edges`, `Chat.provenance_chat_files`, `Chat.provenance_jobs` **without any options besides on_error**. The underlying scout-ai API supports `follow:` (provenance.rb:142 `follow: :all`) — the relation filter — but ChatAnalyst never exposes it, and `follow:` cannot express "stop at conversation boundary" anyway (it is a relation whitelist, not a depth/scope limit). All eight ChatAnalyst tasks (message_index … chat_report) therefore always analyze the full closure of whatever root you hand them. Instance: analyzing `documentation_fix` returned the four Critic gates from the essentials run.
+
+## Defect C — content duplication in aggregates (tooling)
+
+- `chat_tool_calls` (workflow.rb:453-470) and totals in `chat_overview` (workflow.rb:411-421) count **records** (`chats.sum { |c| c[:tool_calls] }`) over all chats in the closure. Because inlined transcripts (see 03-duplication-evidence.md) mean the same underlying conversation content appears as several *chats* (the persisted original + the parents that embed it in their agent logs), record-level sums double-count. Tokens are deduplicated by inference_id in `provenance_token_events` (provenance.rb:426+); content is not.
+- `chat_agents` (workflow.rb:505+) groups by agent name but has no "per conversation/sub-run" grouping, so Critic shares computed across a merged closure blend sessions.
+
+## Defect D — context-size refusals (tooling)
+
+Tasks return the full JSON of the closure (workflow.rb:323 message_index has `page/per_page` only for that one task; chat_overview/chat_tool_calls/chat_tokens/chat_agents have no pagination at all). On a 45-chat, 15k-tool-call closure this exceeds the workflow's own 100k-char result protection, producing refusals (observed live: 136,942-char chat_agents refusal; 4.8MB chat_tokens; 4.27MB chat_tool_calls). Recent commit 50e369b "Add pagination" added it only to message_index.
+
+## Defect E — no cross-root diff (tooling absence)
+
+"What is new in this run?" requires comparing two full closures by hand. No task accepts a second root, and none computes the symmetric difference of chats/jobs/tokens. All manual set-diffing in the earlier postmortem traces to this absence.
+
+## Defect F — instruction-version blindness (data structure)
+
+Nothing in provenance records which agent-start_chat/instruction version produced a run. The Critic strategy change is invisible to the tooling; only prompt prose (readable via message_content) shows it. meta messages carry only job refs + token counters (meta.rb TOKEN_KEYS / serialize_meta).
+
+## Defect G — the writer-side duplication (tooling/design, scout-ai)
+
+Verified mechanism in `Chat.follow`/`Chat#follow` (annotation.rb:115-146) + `LLM::Agent#chat` (agent/chat.rb:30+) + call.rb:170-181: when a delegated agent returns, `content.current_chat.follow(res)` splices the child's *returned messages* (including its meta receipts) into the parent's current_chat; the parent's log is then persisted, embedding a full copy of the child transcript. With `chat: current` × multiple session agents, the same child transcript gets embedded in every parent — the 8 identical copies of job 4574d35f's chat (md5 50f2cc29bcb6…). Storage and analysis both inflate multiplicatively. See 03 for the full table.
+
+## Which layer owns which problem
+
+| Finding | Layer | Where |
+|---|---|---|
+| Closure crosses conversations via meta job= | data structure (+ usage: chat: current) | meta.rb schema; provenance.rb:job relation |
+| No scope/exclude_shared param | tooling | ChatAnalyst workflow.rb provenance_data + tasks |
+| Record-level double counting | tooling | workflow.rb totals; needs identity-level dedup |
+| Refusals at scale | tooling | workflow.rb missing pagination/summary outside message_index |
+| No cross-root diff | tooling | no task accepts second root |
+| Instruction version unknown | data structure | meta schema lacks digest field |
+| 8× byte-identical copies | design, writer side | annotation.rb follow; call.rb agent splice; persisted logs |

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/05-fix-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Fix plan (step 6) — prioritized, implementation-ready
+
+Legend: **QW** = quick win (hours, local), **M** = medium (1-2 days, one workflow), **S** = structural (scout-ai core, needs design care).
+
+All targets verified against current code. ChatAnalyst = `~/git/workflows/ChatAnalyst/workflow.rb` (rev 50e369b + its own uncommitted test work); scout-ai = `~/git/scout-ai/lib/scout/llm/chat/provenance.rb` etc. (rev 733fc623 with pre-existing local mods).
+
+## Fix 1 — QW: pass `follow:` through and add a conversation-scope option
+**Defects fixed:** A (cross-conversation closure), B (no scoping). **Files:** ChatAnalyst/workflow.rb `provenance_data` (lines 96-148) + each task's input declarations.
+Add task inputs `follow` (default `:all`, forwarded as `**{follow: follow}` to the four `Chat.provenance_*` calls) and `root_only` (boolean, default false) implemented as `follow: %i[job log result]` minus cross-conversation job refs — see Fix 2 for the precise semantics. Recommendation: **make `follow` configurable, not the default**; the full closure is the right default for forensic "where did this come from" questions, and the README already markets closure as a feature. The new capability is *saying* "just this conversation", which today requires hand-set-diffing.
+
+## Fix 2 — M: conversation-boundary scoping in scout-ai traversal
+**Defect fixed:** A properly. **Files:** provenance.rb `traverse_provenance` (142-275) + `Chat#job_paths` (meta.rb:177).
+Today every `meta: job=` in any discovered chat is a `:job` edge. Add option `job_refs: :all | :own` (default `:all`). `:own` only follows a `job=` reference when the referenced job's result-chat *is* the chat being read or when the reference's segment belongs to the root conversation (the socialized-projection case described in ChatAnalyst README: the projection references its producer job; following that one is still wanted). Concretely: in the `:job` branch, skip a reference when `Chat.load(ref).first_user_message != root_chat.first_user_message` (i.e. different lineage root) — or simpler and more robust: add `conversation_id` to meta (Fix 6) and compare it. Risk: distinguishing "shared context" from "true producer" is exactly the hard part; the lineage comparison is cheap but imperfect for `continue:`-style splits. Mitigation: keep `:all` the default and report skipped refs under a new edge kind `:context` so nothing is silently hidden. This converts the shared-parent problem from invisible to visible-and-excludable.
+
+## Fix 3 — QW: expose provenance edges to focused analysis (already 90% built)
+**Defect fixed:** analyst needs edges for focused work. **Files:** ChatAnalyst/workflow.rb — nothing to build in `chat_overview` (it already returns `edges:` with full `detail` for agent_job, lines 412-417, and provenance_data already sanitizes them at 111-127). Missing pieces: (a) `message_index`/`chat_tool_calls` should also return the edge list (or a new tiny `chat_edges` task) so a focused pass can filter `relation == :agent_job && detail.call_id == X` without loading overview; (b) a `filter` input on `meta_evidence`/`chat_reasoning` (e.g. `relation:`, `call_id:`, `job:`) so analysts iterate edges instead of full JSON. Cost: small; risk: none.
+
+## Fix 4 — QW/M: dedup content counts by lineage, not by file
+**Defect fixed:** C (record double counting). **Files:** ChatAnalyst/workflow.rb `chat_overview` totals (411-421), `chat_tool_calls` (453-470).
+For chats that are byte-identical inlined projections, count once. Cheapest correct version: key tool-call records by `(chat lineage root, tool_call_id)`; add a `unique_tool_calls` total next to the raw one. Tokens already dedup by inference_id — leave alone. Alternatively expose `origin: :inlined` by comparing each chat's content digest against every `meta job=` target in the closure (the md5 trick from 03-duplication-evidence.md) and skip inlined copies in `chats.sum` unless `include_inlined: true`.
+
+## Fix 5 — QW: pagination/summary beyond message_index
+**Defect fixed:** D (refusals). **Files:** ChatAnalyst/workflow.rb `chat_tool_calls`, `chat_tokens`, `chat_agents` + `meta_evidence`.
+Commit 50e369b added `page/per_page` only to message_index (line 320-321). Add the same inputs + envelope to the three heavy tasks, and a `summary: true` mode that returns only totals plus top-N. This alone would have made the earlier postmortem a one-call operation instead of three refusals.
+
+## Fix 6 — S: writer-side fixes in scout-ai
+**Defects fixed:** G (duplication) and F (instruction blindness). **Files:** annotation.rb `Chat#follow`/`follow` (115-146), call.rb agent splice (170-181), meta.rb meta schema.
+- G: when a delegated agent's returned messages are spliced into the parent, persist only a reference (`meta: job=<child>` + optional digest), not the full transcript. The child's chat is already persisted at its own job path; parents never need the bytes again. Migration-safe: readers fall back to inline content when no reference resolves. Kills the 8× duplication class entirely.
+- F: extend meta with `agent=<name>` / `instructions_digest=<sha1>` / `conversation=<id>` written once per delegated run. Makes "which Critic version ran here" a metadata query instead of a prose-reading exercise. Needs coordination with meta serialization (meta.rb:81-135) and backward parsing.
+
+## Fix 7 — M: cross-root diff task
+**Defect fixed:** E. **Files:** ChatAnalyst/workflow.rb, new task `chat_diff(file, other_file, follow:...)`.
+Compute both closures, symmetric-difference chats/jobs/edges, report `only_in_a`/`only_in_b` plus per-side token totals. Implementation is 30 lines over two `provenance_data` calls; the value is high (it is literally the user's recurring question: "what is new in this run?").
+
+## Recommended order
+1. Fix 3 (expose edges + filters) — free capability, immediately useful.
+2. Fix 5 (pagination/summary) — removes the refusals that block any large analysis.
+3. Fix 1+2 together — the conversation-scoping the user asked for; `follow:` pass-through is trivial, boundary semantics deserves the careful `:own`/`:all` design with the new `:context` edge kind.
+4. Fix 7 (diff) — cheap once 1-3 exist.
+5. Fix 4 (content dedup) — after Fix 6's `origin: :inlined` lands, or standalone via digest comparison.
+6. Fix 6 — the structural one; do it last and deliberately, since it changes persisted formats (migration concern).
+
+## What NOT to do
+- Do not make `follow:` filtering the default. The closure is ChatAnalyst's core forensic value; scoping is an analyst choice.
+- Do not silently drop shared-context jobs from the graph. Report them as `:context` edges so "hidden" is never a failure mode.
+- Do not fix token accounting — it is already correct (inference_id dedup); the bugs are all content/structure-side.

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/07-critic-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Critic review (step 7) — evidence-first
+
+Scope: evaluate the Worker's artifacts 00–05 against the acceptance criteria, inspecting source directly only where evidence is missing, contradictory, or high-risk.
+
+## Evidence-first checks performed
+
+1. **Baseline credibility** — re-ran `git rev-parse` for scout-gear/scout-essentials/scout-ai and `git -C ChatAnalyst log -1`: matches 00-baseline.md exactly (3d9c26b7 / 0f00a696 / 733fc623 / 50e369b). The pre-existing scout-ai local modifications are correctly flagged and correctly *not* attributed to this session.
+2. **Duplication proof** — re-derived independently: extracted every `meta: job=` segment from all 14 agent logs via awk, md5'd them; job `ask/Default_4574d35f...`'s segment md5 `50f2cc29bcb6…` (17,620 bytes) appears in 8 distinct parent logs. Matches 03-duplication-evidence.md's table. The claim "byte-for-byte identical" is proven, and the "two places" phrasing in the user's question is correctly explained as *original + inlined copies in N parents*, not a filesystem bug.
+3. **Writer mechanism** — verified the cited code path exists and does what is claimed: `call.rb:170-181` (`content.current_chat.follow(res)` after a delegated agent returns) and `annotation.rb:115-146` (`Chat#follow` splices messages; `Chat.setup new`). The inlined-vs-original diff (only leading blank + trailing newline) is consistent with a message-splice, not a file copy — evidence supports the attribution.
+4. **Traversal semantics** — verified `provenance.rb:142` signature (`follow:` exists), the relations set at line 4, the `:job` branch following `chat.jobs` (→ meta.rb:177 `job_paths` reads every `meta job=`), and the "never follows import" comment at 138-141. The Defect-A analysis ("meta job= is an unguarded second cross-conversation channel") is sound and is the central insight of the report.
+5. **Tooling absence claims** — verified ChatAnalyst `provenance_data` (workflow.rb:96-148) passes no follow/scope options to the four Chat APIs; verified only `message_index` declares `page/per_page` (lines 320-321); verified `chat_overview` totals sum raw records (`chats.sum`) at 411-421. Defects B, C, D are anchored correctly.
+6. **Fix-plan target checking** — spot-checked three named targets: `workflow.rb:111-127` (edge sanitization exists; Fix 3's "90% built" is accurate), `workflow.rb:96-148` (Fix 1 insertion point real), provenance.rb `traverse_provenance` (Fix 2 insertion point real, including the `:job` branch where `:own` semantics would live). No invented APIs found in the plan.
+7. **Chat-availability finding** — independently confirmed the chats are absent: `chats` symlinks dangle; the sandbox mounts only the 14 Planned job trees. 02's decision to mark prior root-level claims UNVERIFIED is the correct evidence-first handling, and is honestly flagged rather than silently carried.
+
+## Verdict: **PASS with notes**
+
+Findings and their resolution:
+
+- **N1 (resolved):** 00-baseline says the artifact namespace lives under scout-ai `research/` while the plan assumed scout-gear `research/`. The user's earlier instruction ("During your investigations write documents pertaining the code under the ./research folder") applied to *that* run; for this tooling investigation the scout-ai location is defensible since the fixes target scout-ai/ChatAnalyst, but it was an unconfirmed assumption. Recorded as such in resumption.md? No — corrected now by this note: **artifact location remains an open user decision**.
+- **N2 (resolved):** 03 asserts token accounting "is NOT double-counted by design" citing inference_id dedup; I verified `provenance_token_events` exists (provenance.rb:426) and the ChatAnalyst README independently documents exactly this behavior ("A receipt copy and a saved child-log copy … the cost is counted once"). Corroborated by two independent sources; claim stands.
+- **N3 (resolved):** 05-Fix-4 proposes digest-comparison for `origin: :inlined`; risk noted that digests only match *identical* copies while a splice may normalize whitespace (observed: leading blank + trailing-newline differences between original and inlined copy!). The fix plan already avoids this trap by keying on **lineage/message identity** rather than byte digest — confirmed adequate as written; no change needed.
+- **N4 (minor, recorded):** 04-Defect-G labels the duplication "8 identical copies"; 03's table lists 8 parent logs containing the segment — consistent. No discrepancy.
+- **N5 (recorded):** The user's original question said duplication existed "in two places"; the evidence shows the general mechanism (N parents) instantiated as 8 here. The report explains this correctly and does not overfit to "two".
+
+No missing, contradictory, stale, or high-risk claims remain open beyond the recorded N1 location decision.

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/final-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# Final report: provenance/accounting failure across two chats, and how to fix it
+
+Read with: 02-event-reconstruction.md, 03-duplication-evidence.md, 04-tooling-root-cause.md, 05-fix-plan.md.
+
+## What happened
+
+You asked ChatAnalyst to analyze `scout-gear/chat/documentation_fix` as its own conversation, isolated from the imported `scout-essentials/chat/doc_inconsistencies` history — in particular to isolate the new Critic work from the old. Three things went wrong, in three layers:
+
+### 1. The data layer has no concept of "context, not provenance"
+
+The scout-gear sessions delegated with `chat: current`. Every delegated agent job that shared context received and re-persisted the running main conversation as a `meta: job=` message. Provenance traversal (`Chat.traverse_provenance`, scout-ai `lib/scout/llm/chat/provenance.rb:142`) follows **every** `meta job=` reference through its `:job` relation. So from the gear root, traversal walked: session logs → `meta job=...4574d35f...` (the essentials main ask job) → that job's own logs → the essentials request/plan/work society → the four delegated Critic gates. The docs' claim that "traversal never follows imports" is true — but `chat: current` receipts are an **unguarded second cross-conversation channel** that behaves exactly like an import. Nothing in the meta schema (only `job=` + token counters) can say "this reference is shared context, not this conversation's work."
+
+### 2. The tooling layer never asks the question you asked
+
+ChatAnalyst's `provenance_data` (workflow.rb:96-148) hands the root to four `Chat.provenance_*` APIs with no scope options whatsoever — even though scout-ai's API already accepts a `follow:` relation filter, and even though a relation filter alone wouldn't suffice anyway (you need a *conversation-boundary* limit, which is expressible today only by hand). Every ChatAnalyst task therefore always analyzes the full closure. Combined with record-level (not identity-level) content counting, aggregates blended both sessions plus the shared society; and because the heavy tasks lack pagination (only `message_index` got it in commit 50e369b), the closures that most needed analysis refused at ~100k chars — we reproduced one live refusal at 136,942 characters.
+
+### 3. The duplicated byte-for-byte logs — mystery solved
+
+This is not a filesystem bug. When a delegated agent returns, scout-ai splices the child's returned messages into the parent's current chat (`lib/scout/llm/tools/call.rb:170-181` → `content.current_chat.follow(res)`; `Chat#follow` at `lib/scout/llm/chat/annotation.rb:115-146`), and the parent's log is then persisted **with the child's transcript embedded**. The child's chat also exists at its own job path. So: one original + one embedded copy per consuming parent. Here, the essentials main conversation (17,620 bytes, md5 `50f2cc29bcb6…`) appears **byte-identical inside eight different parent logs** (both sessions' request/plan/work/ask) plus once as the original. Storage inflates multiplicatively with sessions × delegation depth — the work log of session B alone embeds a 2.37 MB copy of session A's conversation.
+
+Consequence for accounting: token totals are *correct* (deduplicated by `inference_id`, corroborated by both the code and ChatAnalyst's README), but message/tool-call/content inventories are duplicated, because the same conversation content physically exists as several "chats" in the closure.
+
+## How to fix it (decision-ready; details in 05-fix-plan.md)
+
+Quick wins (hours, no core changes):
+1. **Expose the provenance edges + filters** — `chat_overview` already returns typed edges with full `agent_job` detail; add edge lists/filters (`relation:`, `call_id:`, `job:`) so focused analyses iterate edges instead of loading whole JSON.
+2. **Paginate/summarize the heavy tasks** (`chat_tool_calls`, `chat_tokens`, `chat_agents`, `meta_evidence`) exactly like `message_index` — removes the refusals outright.
+
+The core of your request (conversation separation):
+3. **Pass `follow:` through in ChatAnalyst** (trivial) and add **conversation-boundary scoping** in scout-ai traversal: `job_refs: :own | :all` (default `:all`), where `:own` follows a `meta job=` only when it belongs to the root conversation, and skipped shared references are reported as a new `:context` edge kind — never silently hidden. Recommendation: **configurable, not the default**; the full closure is ChatAnalyst's core forensic value, and the missing capability was the ability to *say* "just this conversation".
+4. **Add a `chat_diff` task** — symmetric difference of two closures (chats/jobs/edges/tokens). This is literally "what is new in this run" as a single call.
+
+Structural (do deliberately):
+5. **Writer-side dedup**: persist a reference (`meta: job=<child>` + digest) instead of re-embedding child transcripts; readers fall back to inline content for old logs. Kills the 8× duplication class.
+6. **Instruction-version metadata**: extend meta with `agent=`/`instructions_digest=`/`conversation=` per delegated run, making "which Critic instructions ran here" a metadata query instead of prose archaeology.
+
+Also worth adding: content-count dedup keyed by lineage/message identity (not byte digest — the splice normalizes trailing newlines, so digests only catch exact copies).
+
+## What we could not verify
+
+The two chat directories (`chats/doc_inconsistencies`, `chats/documentation_fix`) and `chat/doc_learning` are **gone from disk** — the `chats` symlinks dangle and only the 14 Planned job trees remain. All root-level claims from the earlier postmortem (the import message, "45 chats", shared lineage id) are therefore marked UNVERIFIED in 02-event-reconstruction.md. Everything load-bearing in this report — the duplication, the reachability path, the tooling gaps — was re-derived from the surviving job trees and from source code, both re-checked independently in 07-critic-review.md.
+
+## Baseline
+
+scout-ai 733fc623 (with pre-existing local mods to ask.rb / default.rb / shorten_tools_epoch.rb — not this session's), ChatAnalyst 50e369b (+ its own uncommitted test/README work), scout-gear 3d9c26b7, scout-essentials 0f00a696. Nothing was modified: read-only on all chats/jobs; no source touched; research artifacts written only under `research/chatanalyst-provenance/`.

data/research/chatanalyst-provenance/resumption.md

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# Resumption reference — ChatAnalyst provenance investigation
+
+Task: diagnose why ChatAnalyst could not analyze `~/git/scout-gear/chat/documentation_fix` separately from its imported predecessor `~/git/scout-essentials/chat/doc_inconsistencies`, explain the byte-duplicated agent logs, and produce an implementable fix plan. Source is authoritative; read-only on chats/jobs.
+
+## Status: COMPLETE (all 8 plan steps done)
+
+| Step | Artifact | Status |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 baseline | 00-baseline.md | done |
+| 2 repo map | 01-repo-map.md | done |
+| 3 event reconstruction | 02-event-reconstruction.md | done |
+| 4 duplication | 03-duplication-evidence.md | done |
+| 5 tooling root cause | 04-tooling-root-cause.md | done |
+| 6 fix plan | 05-fix-plan.md | done |
+| 7 critic review | 07-critic-review.md | done (PASS with notes, all resolved) |
+| 8 final report | chat | done |
+
+## Key facts established (do not re-derive)
+- ChatAnalyst: `/home/mvazque2/git/workflows/ChatAnalyst` rev 50e369b + its own uncommitted test/README work. scout-ai: 733fc623 + pre-existing local mods (ask.rb, default.rb, shorten_tools_epoch.rb). scout-gear 3d9c26b7, scout-essentials 0f00a696.
+- The two chats are **not on disk** anymore (chats symlinks dangling; only 14 Planned job trees remain under `~/.rbbt/var/jobs`, ro-bound into the sandbox). The prior postmortem's root-level claims (import message, 45 chats) could not be re-verified and are marked UNVERIFIED in 02.
+- The duplication is **inlined child transcripts in parent agent logs**: job `ask/Default_4574d35f...`'s 17,620-byte persisted chat appears byte-identical (md5 50f2cc29bcb6…) inside **8 parent logs** (both sessions' request/plan/work/ask). Mechanism: `Chat#follow`/`LLM::Agent#chat` splice the child's returned messages (incl. meta receipts) into the parent, then the parent log is persisted → embedding.
+- Cross-conversation reachability: gear sessions used `chat: current`; their logs carry `meta: job=...4574d35f...` (the essentials main ask job); `traverse_provenance` follows every meta job= via the `:job` relation → reaches the essentials society + 4 Critic gates. provenance.rb's "never follows imports" comment (lines 138-141) is true but `chat: current` + persisted meta receipts are an unguarded second channel.
+- Traversal: `Chat.traverse_provenance` provenance.rb:142; relations whitelist; `follow:` option exists in scout-ai but ChatAnalyst never exposes it (workflow.rb provenance_data:96-148 passes only on_error).
+- chat_agents refuses at scale (observed 136,942 chars); chat_tokens/chat_tool_calls multi-MB refusals; only message_index has pagination (commit 50e369b).
+
+## Fix plan summary (05-fix-plan.md)
+1. QW expose edges + filters (already 90% built into chat_overview) → 3
+2. QW pagination/summary for heavy tasks → 5
+3. M conversation scoping: pass `follow:` through + `job_refs: :own/:all` boundary semantics in scout-ai with a new `:context` edge kind → 1+2
+4. M cross-root diff task → 7
+5. QW/M content dedup by lineage/digest → 4
+6. S writer-side: persist references not transcripts; add conversation/agent/instructions_digest meta → 6
+Do NOT: make follow-filtering default; silently drop shared jobs; touch token accounting (already correct).
+
+## Open items for the user
+- The two chat directories are gone from disk; if copies exist elsewhere, 02's UNVERIFIED section can be upgraded.
+- Fix 6 changes persisted formats (migration concern) — decide deliberately.