rspec-expectations 3.0.0.beta2 → 3.0.0.rc1

data/spec/rspec/matchers/built_in/compound_spec.rb

@@ -1,292 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-module RSpec::Matchers::BuiltIn
-  describe Compound do
-    context "when used as a composable matcher" do
-      it 'can pass' do
-        expect(["food", "barn"]).to include(
-          a_string_starting_with("f").and(ending_with("d")),
-          a_string_starting_with("b").and(ending_with("n"))
-        )
-      end
-
-      it 'can fail' do
-        expect {
-          expect(["foo", "bar"]).to include(
-            a_string_starting_with("f").and(ending_with("d")),
-            a_string_starting_with("b").and(ending_with("n"))
-          )
-        }.to fail_matching('expected ["foo", "bar"] to include (a string starting with "f" and ending with "d") and (a string starting with "b" and ending with "n")')
-      end
-
-      it 'provides a description' do
-        matcher = include(
-          a_string_starting_with("f").and(ending_with("d")),
-          a_string_starting_with("b").and(ending_with("n"))
-        )
-
-        expect(matcher.description).to eq('include (a string starting with "f" and ending with "d") and (a string starting with "b" and ending with "n")')
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe "expect(...).to matcher.and(other_matcher)" do
-
-      it_behaves_like "an RSpec matcher", :valid_value => 3, :invalid_value => 4 do
-        let(:matcher) { eq(3).and be <= 3 }
-      end
-
-      context 'when both matchers pass' do
-        it 'passes' do
-          expect(3).to eq(3).and be >= 2
-        end
-      end
-
-      it 'has a description composed of both matcher descriptions' do
-        matcher = eq(3).and be >= 2
-        expect(3).to matcher
-        expect(matcher.description).to eq("eq 3 and be >= 2")
-      end
-
-      context 'when only the first matcher fails' do
-        it "fails with the first matcher's failure message" do
-          expect {
-            expect(3).to eq(4).and be >= 2
-          }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-            |
-            |expected: 4
-            |     got: 3
-            |
-            |(compared using ==)
-            |
-          EOS
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when only the second matcher fails' do
-        it "fails with the second matcher's failure message" do
-          expect {
-            expect(3).to be_kind_of(Integer).and eq(4)
-          }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-            |
-            |expected: 4
-            |     got: 3
-            |
-            |(compared using ==)
-            |
-          EOS
-        end
-      end
-
-      context "when both mathers fail" do
-        context "when both matchers have multi-line failure messages" do
-          it 'fails with a well formatted message containing both sub-messages' do
-            expect {
-              expect(3).to eq(4).and be >= 8
-            }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-              |
-              |   expected: 4
-              |        got: 3
-              |
-              |   (compared using ==)
-              |
-              |...and:
-              |
-              |   expected: >= 8
-              |        got:    3
-            EOS
-          end
-        end
-
-        context "when both matchers have single-line failure messages" do
-          it 'fails with a single-line failure message' do
-            expect {
-              expect("foo").to start_with("a").and end_with("z")
-            }.to fail_with('expected "foo" to start with "a" and expected "foo" to end with "z"')
-          end
-        end
-
-        context "when the first matcher has a multi-line failure message" do
-          it 'fails with a well formatted message containing both sub-messages' do
-            expect {
-              expect("foo").to eq(4).and end_with("z")
-            }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-              |
-              |   expected: 4
-              |        got: "foo"
-              |
-              |   (compared using ==)
-              |
-              |...and:
-              |
-              |   expected "foo" to end with "z"
-            EOS
-          end
-        end
-
-        context "when the second matcher has a multi-line failure message" do
-          it 'fails with a well formatted message containing both sub-messages' do
-            expect {
-              expect("foo").to end_with("z").and eq(4)
-            }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-              |   expected "foo" to end with "z"
-              |
-              |...and:
-              |
-              |   expected: 4
-              |        got: "foo"
-              |
-              |   (compared using ==)
-              |
-            EOS
-          end
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe "expect(...).not_to matcher.and(other_matcher)" do
-      it "is not supported" do
-        expect {
-          expect(3).not_to eq(2).and be > 2
-        }.to raise_error(NotImplementedError, /matcher.and matcher` is not supported/)
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe "expect(...).to matcher.or(other_matcher)" do
-      it_behaves_like "an RSpec matcher", :valid_value => 3, :invalid_value => 5 do
-        let(:matcher) { eq(3).or eq(4) }
-      end
-
-      it 'has a description composed of both matcher descriptions' do
-        matcher = eq(3).or eq(4)
-        expect(3).to matcher
-        expect(matcher.description).to eq("eq 3 or eq 4")
-      end
-
-      context 'when both matchers pass' do
-        it 'passes' do
-          expect("foo").to start_with("f").or end_with("o")
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when only the first matcher passes' do
-        it 'passes' do
-          expect("foo").to start_with("f").or end_with("z")
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when only the last matcher passes' do
-        it 'passes' do
-          expect("foo").to start_with("a").or end_with("o")
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when both matchers fail' do
-        context "when both matchers have multi-line failure messages" do
-          it 'fails with a well formatted message containing both sub-messages' do
-            expect {
-              expect(3).to eq(4).or be >= 8
-            }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-              |
-              |   expected: 4
-              |        got: 3
-              |
-              |   (compared using ==)
-              |
-              |...or:
-              |
-              |   expected: >= 8
-              |        got:    3
-            EOS
-          end
-        end
-
-        context "when both matchers have single-line failure messages" do
-          it 'fails with a single-line failure message' do
-            expect {
-              expect("foo").to start_with("a").or end_with("z")
-            }.to fail_with('expected "foo" to start with "a" or expected "foo" to end with "z"')
-          end
-        end
-
-        context "when the first matcher has a multi-line failure message" do
-          it 'fails with a well formatted message containing both sub-messages' do
-            expect {
-              expect("foo").to eq(4).or end_with("z")
-            }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-              |
-              |   expected: 4
-              |        got: "foo"
-              |
-              |   (compared using ==)
-              |
-              |...or:
-              |
-              |   expected "foo" to end with "z"
-            EOS
-          end
-        end
-
-        context "when the second matcher has a multi-line failure message" do
-          it 'fails with a well formatted message containing both sub-messages' do
-            expect {
-              expect("foo").to end_with("z").or eq(4)
-            }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-              |   expected "foo" to end with "z"
-              |
-              |...or:
-              |
-              |   expected: 4
-              |        got: "foo"
-              |
-              |   (compared using ==)
-              |
-            EOS
-          end
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context "when chaining many matchers together" do
-      it 'can pass appropriately' do
-        matcher = start_with("f").and end_with("z").or end_with("o")
-        expect("foo").to matcher
-        expect(matcher.description).to eq('start with "f" and end with "z" or end with "o"')
-      end
-
-      it 'fails with a complete message' do
-        expect {
-          expect(3).to eq(1).and eq(2).and eq(3).and eq(4)
-        }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-          |
-          |   expected: 1
-          |        got: 3
-          |
-          |   (compared using ==)
-          |
-          |...and:
-          |
-          |      expected: 2
-          |           got: 3
-          |
-          |      (compared using ==)
-          |
-          |   ...and:
-          |
-          |      expected: 4
-          |           got: 3
-          |
-          |      (compared using ==)
-          |
-        EOS
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe "expect(...).not_to matcher.or(other_matcher)" do
-      it "is not supported" do
-        expect {
-          expect(3).not_to eq(2).or be > 2
-        }.to raise_error(NotImplementedError, /matcher.or matcher` is not supported/)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end

data/spec/rspec/matchers/built_in/contain_exactly_spec.rb

@@ -1,441 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-require 'timeout'
-
-class UnsortableObject
-  def initialize(id)
-    @id = id
-  end
-
-  def inspect
-    @id.to_s
-  end
-
-  def ==(other)
-    false
-  end
-end
-
-# AR::Relation is meant to act like a collection, but does
-# not include `Enumerable`. It does implement `to_ary`.
-class FakeActiveRecordRelation
-  def initialize(records)
-    @records = records
-  end
-
-  def to_ary
-    @records
-  end
-end
-
-describe "should =~ array", :uses_should do
-  it "passes a valid positive expectation" do
-    [1, 2].should =~ [2, 1]
-  end
-
-  it "fails an invalid positive expectation" do
-    expect {
-      [1, 2, 3].should =~ [2, 1]
-    }.to fail_with(/expected collection contained/)
-  end
-
-  context "when the array defines a `=~` method" do
-    it 'delegates to that method rather than using the contain_exactly matcher' do
-      array = []
-      def array.=~(other)
-        other == :foo
-      end
-
-      array.should =~ :foo
-      expect {
-        array.should =~ :bar
-      }.to fail_with(/expected: :bar/)
-    end
-  end
-
-  context 'when the array defines a `send` method' do
-    it 'still works' do
-      array = [1, 2]
-      def array.send; :sent; end
-
-      array.should =~ array
-    end
-  end
-end
-
-describe "should_not =~ [:with, :multiple, :args]", :uses_should do
-  it "is not supported" do
-    expect {
-      [1,2,3].should_not =~ [1,2,3]
-    }.to fail_with(/`contain_exactly` does not support negation/)
-  end
-end
-
-describe "using contain_exactly with expect" do
-  it "passes a valid positive expectation" do
-    expect([1, 2]).to contain_exactly(2, 1)
-  end
-
-  it "fails an invalid positive expectation" do
-    expect {
-      expect([1, 2, 3]).to contain_exactly(2, 1)
-    }.to fail_with(/expected collection contained/)
-  end
-end
-
-describe "expect(array).to contain_exactly(*other_array)" do
-  it_behaves_like "an RSpec matcher", :valid_value => [1, 2], :invalid_value => [1] do
-    let(:matcher) { contain_exactly(2, 1) }
-  end
-
-  it 'is also exposed as `match_array` (with unsplatted args)' do
-    expect([1, 2, 3]).to match_array([3, 2, 1])
-  end
-
-  it "passes if target contains all items" do
-    expect([1,2,3]).to contain_exactly(1,2,3)
-  end
-
-  it "passes if target contains all items out of order" do
-    expect([1,3,2]).to contain_exactly(1,2,3)
-  end
-
-  def timeout_if_not_debugging(time)
-    return yield if defined?(::Debugger)
-    Timeout.timeout(time) { yield }
-  end
-
-  it 'fails a match of 11 items with duplicates in a reasonable amount of time' do
-    timeout_if_not_debugging(0.1) do
-      expected = [0, 1, 1,    3, 3, 3,    4, 4,    8, 8, 9   ]
-      actual   = [   1,    2, 3, 3, 3, 3,       7, 8, 8, 9, 9]
-
-      expect {
-        expect(actual).to contain_exactly(*expected)
-      }.to fail_matching("the missing elements were:      [0, 1, 4, 4]")
-    end
-  end
-
-  it "fails if target includes extra items" do
-    expect {
-      expect([1,2,3,4]).to contain_exactly(1,2,3)
-    }.to fail_with(<<-MESSAGE)
-expected collection contained:  [1, 2, 3]
-actual collection contained:    [1, 2, 3, 4]
-the extra elements were:        [4]
-MESSAGE
-  end
-
-  it "fails if target is missing items" do
-    expect {
-      expect([1,2]).to contain_exactly(1,2,3)
-    }.to fail_with(<<-MESSAGE)
-expected collection contained:  [1, 2, 3]
-actual collection contained:    [1, 2]
-the missing elements were:      [3]
-MESSAGE
-  end
-
-  it "fails if target is missing items and has extra items" do
-    expect {
-      expect([1,2,4]).to contain_exactly(1,2,3)
-    }.to fail_with(<<-MESSAGE)
-expected collection contained:  [1, 2, 3]
-actual collection contained:    [1, 2, 4]
-the missing elements were:      [3]
-the extra elements were:        [4]
-MESSAGE
-  end
-
-  it "sorts items in the error message if they all respond to <=>" do
-    expect {
-      expect([6,2,1,5]).to contain_exactly(4,1,2,3)
-    }.to fail_with(<<-MESSAGE)
-expected collection contained:  [1, 2, 3, 4]
-actual collection contained:    [1, 2, 5, 6]
-the missing elements were:      [3, 4]
-the extra elements were:        [5, 6]
-MESSAGE
-  end
-
-    it "does not sort items in the error message if they don't all respond to <=>" do
-      expect {
-        expect([UnsortableObject.new(2), UnsortableObject.new(1)]).to contain_exactly(UnsortableObject.new(4), UnsortableObject.new(3))
-      }.to fail_with(<<-MESSAGE)
-expected collection contained:  [4, 3]
-actual collection contained:    [2, 1]
-the missing elements were:      [4, 3]
-the extra elements were:        [2, 1]
-MESSAGE
-    end
-
-  it "accurately reports extra elements when there are duplicates" do
-    expect {
-      expect([1,1,1,5]).to contain_exactly(1,5)
-    }.to fail_with(<<-MESSAGE)
-expected collection contained:  [1, 5]
-actual collection contained:    [1, 1, 1, 5]
-the extra elements were:        [1, 1]
-MESSAGE
-  end
-
-  it "accurately reports missing elements when there are duplicates" do
-    expect {
-      expect([1,5]).to contain_exactly(1,1,5)
-    }.to fail_with(<<-MESSAGE)
-expected collection contained:  [1, 1, 5]
-actual collection contained:    [1, 5]
-the missing elements were:      [1]
-MESSAGE
-  end
-end
-
-describe "expect(...).not_to contain_exactly(:with, :multiple, :args]" do
-  it "is not supported" do
-    expect {
-      expect([1,2,3]).not_to contain_exactly(1,2,3)
-    }.to fail_with(/`contain_exactly` does not support negation/)
-  end
-end
-
-describe "matching against things that aren't arrays" do
-  it "fails with nil and the expected error message is given" do
-    expect {
-      expect(nil).to contain_exactly(1, 2, 3)
-    }.to fail_with(/expected a collection/)
-  end
-
-  it "fails with a float and the expected error message is given" do
-    expect {
-      expect(3.7).to contain_exactly(1, 2, 3)
-    }.to fail_with(/expected a collection/)
-  end
-
-  it "fails with a string and the expected error message is given" do
-    expect {
-      expect("I like turtles").to contain_exactly(1, 2, 3)
-    }.to fail_with(/expected a collection/)
-  end
-
-  it 'works with other collection types' do
-    expect(Set.new([3, 2, 1])).to contain_exactly(1, 2, 3)
-    expect {
-      expect(Set.new([3, 2, 1])).to contain_exactly(1, 2)
-    }.to fail_matching("expected collection contained:  [1, 2]")
-  end
-
-  it 'works with non-enumerables that implement `to_ary`' do
-    relation = FakeActiveRecordRelation.new([1, 2, 3])
-    expect(relation).to contain_exactly(2, 1, 3)
-    expect {
-      expect(relation).to contain_exactly(1, 2)
-    }.to fail_matching("expected collection contained:  [1, 2]")
-  end
-end
-
-describe "Composing `contain_exactly` with other matchers" do
-  describe "expect(...).to contain_exactly(matcher, matcher])" do
-    it 'passes when the array matches the matchers in the same order' do
-      expect(["food", "barn"]).to contain_exactly(
-        a_string_matching(/foo/),
-        a_string_matching(/bar/)
-      )
-    end
-
-    it 'passes when the array matches the matchers in a different order' do
-      expect(["food", "barn"]).to contain_exactly(
-        a_string_matching(/bar/),
-        a_string_matching(/foo/)
-      )
-    end
-
-    it 'fails with a useful message when there is an extra element' do
-      expect {
-        expect(["food", "barn", "goo"]).to contain_exactly(
-          a_string_matching(/bar/),
-          a_string_matching(/foo/)
-        )
-      }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-        |expected collection contained:  [(a string matching /bar/), (a string matching /foo/)]
-        |actual collection contained:    ["barn", "food", "goo"]
-        |the extra elements were:        ["goo"]
-        |
-      EOS
-    end
-
-    it 'fails with a useful message when there is a missing element' do
-      expect {
-        expect(["food", "barn"]).to contain_exactly(
-          a_string_matching(/bar/),
-          a_string_matching(/foo/),
-          a_string_matching(/goo/)
-        )
-      }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-        |expected collection contained:  [(a string matching /bar/), (a string matching /foo/), (a string matching /goo/)]
-        |actual collection contained:    ["barn", "food"]
-        |the missing elements were:      [(a string matching /goo/)]
-        |
-      EOS
-    end
-
-    it 'pairs up the items in order to minimize the number of unpaired items' do
-      expect {
-        expect(["fool", "food", "good"]).to contain_exactly(/foo/, /fool/, /poo/)
-      }.to fail_with(dedent <<-EOS)
-        |expected collection contained:  [/foo/, /fool/, /poo/]
-        |actual collection contained:    ["food", "fool", "good"]
-        |the missing elements were:      [/poo/]
-        |the extra elements were:        ["good"]
-        |
-      EOS
-    end
-
-    it 'provides a description' do
-      description = contain_exactly(a_string_matching(/bar/), a_string_matching(/foo/)).description
-      expect(description).to eq("contain exactly (a string matching /bar/) and (a string matching /foo/)")
-    end
-
-    context 'when an earlier matcher matches more strictly than a later matcher' do
-      it 'works when the actual items match in the same order' do
-        expect(["food", "fool"]).to contain_exactly(a_string_matching(/foo/), a_string_matching(/fool/))
-      end
-
-      it 'works when the actual items match in reverse order' do
-        expect(["fool", "food"]).to contain_exactly(a_string_matching(/foo/), a_string_matching(/fool/))
-      end
-
-      it 'can handle multiple sets of overlapping matches' do
-        expect(["fool", "barn", "bare", "food"]).to contain_exactly(
-          a_string_matching(/bar/),
-          a_string_matching(/barn/),
-          a_string_matching(/foo/),
-          a_string_matching(/fool/)
-        )
-      end
-    end
-
-    it "can use `a_value_within` and `a_string_starting_with` against multiple types of values" do
-      expect(["barn", 2.45]).to contain_exactly(
-        a_value_within(0.1).of(2.5),
-        a_string_starting_with("bar")
-      )
-    end
-
-    context 'when a later matcher matches more strictly than an earlier matcher' do
-      it 'works when the actual items match in the same order' do
-        expect(["fool", "food"]).to contain_exactly(a_string_matching(/fool/), a_string_matching(/foo/))
-      end
-
-      it 'works when the actual items match in reverse order' do
-        expect(["food", "fool"]).to contain_exactly(a_string_matching(/fool/), a_string_matching(/foo/))
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
-
-module RSpec
-  module Matchers
-    module BuiltIn
-      class ContainExactly
-        describe PairingsMaximizer do
-          it 'finds unmatched expected indexes' do
-            maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [], 1 => [0] }, { 0 => [1] })
-            expect(maximizer.solution.unmatched_expected_indexes).to eq([0])
-          end
-
-          it 'finds unmatched actual indexes' do
-            maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [0] }, { 0 => [0], 1 => [] })
-            expect(maximizer.solution.unmatched_actual_indexes).to eq([1])
-          end
-
-          describe "finding indeterminate indexes" do
-            it 'does not include unmatched indexes' do
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [], 1 => [0] }, { 0 => [1], 1 => [] })
-
-              expect(maximizer.solution.indeterminate_expected_indexes).not_to include(0)
-              expect(maximizer.solution.indeterminate_actual_indexes).not_to include(1)
-            end
-
-            it 'does not include indexes that are reciprocally to exactly one index' do
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [], 1 => [0] }, { 0 => [1], 1 => [0] })
-
-              expect(maximizer.solution.indeterminate_expected_indexes).not_to include(1)
-              expect(maximizer.solution.indeterminate_actual_indexes).not_to include(0)
-            end
-
-            it 'includes indexes that have multiple matches' do
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [0, 2], 1 => [0, 2], 2 => [] },
-                                                { 0 => [0, 1], 1 => [], 2 => [0, 1] })
-
-
-              expect(maximizer.solution.indeterminate_expected_indexes).to include(0, 1)
-              expect(maximizer.solution.indeterminate_actual_indexes).to include(0, 2)
-            end
-
-            it 'includes indexes that have one match which has multiple matches' do
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [0], 1 => [0], 2 => [1, 2] },
-                                                { 0 => [0, 1], 1 => [2], 2 => [2] })
-
-              expect(maximizer.solution.indeterminate_expected_indexes).to include(0, 1)
-              expect(maximizer.solution.indeterminate_actual_indexes).to include(1, 2)
-            end
-          end
-
-          describe "#unmatched_item_count" do
-            it 'returns the count of unmatched items' do
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [1], 1 => [0] },
-                                                { 0 => [1], 1 => [0] })
-              expect(maximizer.solution.unmatched_item_count).to eq(0)
-
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [1], 1 => [0] },
-                                                { 0 => [1], 1 => [0], 2 => [] })
-              expect(maximizer.solution.unmatched_item_count).to eq(1)
-            end
-          end
-
-          describe "#find_best_solution" do
-            matcher :produce_result do |unmatched_expected, unmatched_actual|
-              match do |result|
-                result.candidate? &&
-                result.unmatched_expected_indexes == unmatched_expected &&
-                result.unmatched_actual_indexes   == unmatched_actual
-              end
-
-              failure_message do |result|
-                if result.candidate_result?
-                  "expected a complete solution, but still had indeterminate indexes: " +
-                  "expected: #{result.indeterminate_expected_indexes.inspect}; " +
-                  "actual: #{result.indeterminate_actual_indexes.inspect}"
-                elsif result.unmatched_expected_indexes != unmatched_expected
-                  "expected unmatched_expected_indexes: #{unmatched_expected.inspect} " +
-                  "but got: #{result.unmatched_expected_indexes.inspect}"
-                elsif result.unmatched_actual_indexes != unmatched_actual
-                  "expected unmatched_actual_indexes: #{unmatched_actual.inspect} " +
-                  "but got: #{result.unmatched_actual_indexes.inspect}"
-                end
-              end
-            end
-
-            it 'returns no unmatched indexes when everything reciprocally matches one item' do
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [1], 1 => [0] },
-                                                { 0 => [1], 1 => [0] })
-              expect(maximizer.find_best_solution).to produce_result([], [])
-            end
-
-            it 'returns unmatched indexes for everything that has no matches' do
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [], 1 => [0] },
-                                                { 0 => [1], 1 => [] })
-              expect(maximizer.find_best_solution).to produce_result([0], [1])
-            end
-
-            it 'searches the solution space for a perfectly matching solution' do
-              maximizer = PairingsMaximizer.new({ 0 => [0, 1], 1 => [0] },
-                                                { 0 => [0, 1], 1 => [0] })
-              expect(maximizer.find_best_solution).to produce_result([], [])
-            end
-          end
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
-