ripper-plus 1.2.0 → 1.2.1

data/README.md

@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Some of these errors are noticed by Ripper, and the offending portion of the syn
           [:var_alias, [:@gvar, "$foo", [1, 6]], [:@backref, "$2", [1, 11]]]]]]
     # Invalid class name
     pp Ripper.sexp('class abc; end')
-    #=> [:program,
+    => [:program,
          [[:class,
            [:const_ref, [:class_name_error, [:@ident, "abc", [1, 6]]]],
            nil,
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ The first error, a disallowed alias, results in an `:alias_error` node wrapping
 
 [code]
     pp Ripper.sexp('def foo(a, @b); end')
-    #=> [:program,
+    => [:program,
          [[:def,
            [:@ident, "foo", [1, 4]],
            [:paren,
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Worse, some errors are not caught at all:
 
 [code]
     pp Ripper.sexp('def foo(a, a, a); end')
-    #=> [:program,
+    => [:program,
          [[:def,
            [:@ident, "foo", [1, 4]],
            [:paren,
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ This is very bad. Now every consumer of the Ripper parse tree must check *all me
 
 [code]
     pp Ripper.sexp('something.each { |a, (b, *c, (d, e), a), f| }')
-    #=> [:program,
+    => [:program,
          [[:method_add_block,
            [:call,
             [:var_ref, [:@ident, "something", [1, 0]]], :".",
@@ -198,8 +198,6 @@ Overall, Ripper is very complete for a library covered in "EXPERIMENTAL" warning
 
 In the meantime, I'll be using `ripper-plus` in Laser to statically analyze all kinds of stuff about Ruby, but I look forward to the day where I can add `RipperPlus = Ripper if RUBY_VERSION >= MERGED_VERSION` to ripper-plus's main file. `ripper-plus` is O(N), though it's not blazingly fast: it takes about 20-30 ms on my machine to transform the Ripper AST for [the biggest, ugliest Laser code file: the CFG compiler](https://github.com/michaeledgar/laser/blob/master/lib/laser/analysis/control_flow/cfg_builder.rb) to a RipperPlus AST. It takes 50ms for Ripper to parse it in the first place. (That benchmarked transformation is done in-place: `ripper-plus`'s default behavior is to duplicate the Ripper AST.)
 
-If you have ideas or thoughts, please discuss them on ruby-talk and/or ruby-core! I don't have comments implemented for a reason: I feel it fragments the center of discussion.
-
 ## Contributing to ripper-plus
  
 * Check out the latest master to make sure the feature hasn't been implemented or the bug hasn't been fixed yet

data/lib/ripper-plus/version.rb

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ module RipperPlus
   module Version
     MAJOR = 1
     MINOR = 2
-    PATCH = 0
+    PATCH = 1
     BUILD = ''
 
     if BUILD.empty?

metadata

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 name: ripper-plus
 version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
   prerelease: 
-  version: 1.2.0
+  version: 1.2.1
 platform: ruby
 authors: 
 - Michael Edgar
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ required_ruby_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement
   requirements: 
   - - ">="
     - !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
-      hash: -1365054536111206632
+      hash: -1596603294838898229
       segments: 
       - 0
       version: "0"