puppet 6.14.0-universal-darwin → 6.15.0-universal-darwin

data/spec/unit/ssl/host_spec.rb

@@ -51,8 +51,10 @@ describe Puppet::SSL::Host, if: !Puppet::Util::Platform.jruby? do
       allow_any_instance_of(Puppet::SSL::Host).to receive(:generate)
     end
 
-    it "should have a method for producing an instance to manage the local host's keys" do
-      expect(Puppet::SSL::Host).to respond_to(:localhost)
+    it "is deprecated" do
+      Puppet::SSL::Host.localhost
+
+      expect(@logs).to include(an_object_having_attributes(message: /Puppet::SSL::Host is deprecated/))
     end
 
     it "should allow to reset localhost" do

data/spec/unit/ssl/oids_spec.rb

@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ describe Puppet::SSL::Oids do
       'pp_cloudplatform'    => '1.3.6.1.4.1.34380.1.1.23',
       'pp_apptier'          => '1.3.6.1.4.1.34380.1.1.24',
       'pp_hostname'         => '1.3.6.1.4.1.34380.1.1.25',
+      'pp_owner'            => '1.3.6.1.4.1.34380.1.1.26',
       'ppPrivCertExt'       => '1.3.6.1.4.1.34380.1.2',
       'ppAuthCertExt'       => '1.3.6.1.4.1.34380.1.3',
       'pp_authorization'    => '1.3.6.1.4.1.34380.1.3.1',

data/spec/unit/ssl/state_machine_spec.rb

@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ describe Puppet::SSL::StateMachine, unless: Puppet::Util::Platform.jruby? do
   end
 
   context 'when locking' do
-    let(:lockfile) { double('ssllockfile') }
+    let(:lockfile) { Puppet::Util::Pidlock.new(Puppet[:ssl_lockfile]) }
     let(:machine) { described_class.new(cert_provider: cert_provider, ssl_provider: ssl_provider, lockfile: lockfile) }
 
     # lockfile is deleted before `ensure_ca_certificates` returns, so
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ describe Puppet::SSL::StateMachine, unless: Puppet::Util::Platform.jruby? do
     end
 
     it 'locks the file prior to running the state machine and unlocks when done' do
-      expect(lockfile).to receive(:lock).and_return(true).ordered
+      expect(lockfile).to receive(:lock).and_call_original.ordered
       expect(cert_provider).to receive(:load_cacerts).and_return(cacerts).ordered
       expect(cert_provider).to receive(:load_crls).and_return(crls).ordered
       expect(lockfile).to receive(:unlock).ordered
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ describe Puppet::SSL::StateMachine, unless: Puppet::Util::Platform.jruby? do
         }.to output(/Exiting now because the waitforcert setting is set to 0./).to_stdout
       end
 
-      it 'sleeps and transitions to NeedCACerts' do
+      it 'sleeps and transitions to NeedLock' do
         machine = described_class.new(waitforcert: 15)
 
         state = Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::Wait.new(machine)
@@ -845,10 +845,10 @@ describe Puppet::SSL::StateMachine, unless: Puppet::Util::Platform.jruby? do
 
         expect(Puppet).to receive(:info).with(/Will try again in 15 seconds./)
 
-        expect(state.next_state).to be_an_instance_of(Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::NeedCACerts)
+        expect(state.next_state).to be_an_instance_of(Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::NeedLock)
       end
 
-      it 'sleeps and transitions to NeedCACerts when maxwaitforcert is set' do
+      it 'sleeps and transitions to NeedLock when maxwaitforcert is set' do
         machine = described_class.new(waitforcert: 15, maxwaitforcert: 30)
 
         state = Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::Wait.new(machine)
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ describe Puppet::SSL::StateMachine, unless: Puppet::Util::Platform.jruby? do
 
         expect(Puppet).to receive(:info).with(/Will try again in 15 seconds./)
 
-        expect(state.next_state).to be_an_instance_of(Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::NeedCACerts)
+        expect(state.next_state).to be_an_instance_of(Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::NeedLock)
       end
 
       it 'waits indefinitely by default' do
@@ -887,6 +887,38 @@ describe Puppet::SSL::StateMachine, unless: Puppet::Util::Platform.jruby? do
 
         state.next_state
       end
+
+      it 'releases the lock while sleeping' do
+        lockfile = Puppet::Util::Pidlock.new(Puppet[:ssl_lockfile])
+        machine = described_class.new(lockfile: lockfile)
+        state = Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::Wait.new(machine)
+
+        # pidlock should be unlocked while sleeping
+        allow(Kernel).to receive(:sleep) do
+          expect(lockfile).to_not be_locked
+        end
+
+        # lock before running the state
+        lockfile.lock
+        state.next_state
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'in state NeedLock' do
+      let(:ssl_context) { Puppet::SSL::SSLContext.new(cacerts: []) }
+      let(:lockfile) { Puppet::Util::Pidlock.new(Puppet[:ssl_lockfile]) }
+      let(:machine) { described_class.new(lockfile: lockfile) }
+      let(:state) { Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::NeedLock.new(machine) }
+
+      it 'acquires the lock and transitions to NeedCACerts' do
+        expect(state.next_state).to be_an_instance_of(Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::NeedCACerts)
+        expect(lockfile).to be_locked
+      end
+
+      it 'transitions to LockFailure if it fails to acquire the lock' do
+        expect(lockfile).to receive(:lock).and_return(false)
+        expect(state.next_state).to be_an_instance_of(Puppet::SSL::StateMachine::LockFailure)
+      end
     end
   end
 end

data/spec/unit/transaction/report_spec.rb

@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ describe Puppet::Transaction::Report do
     expect(Puppet::Transaction::Report.new('cv', 'env', 'tid', 'some job id').job_id).to eq('some job id')
   end
 
+  it "should take a 'start_time' as an argument" do
+    expect(Puppet::Transaction::Report.new('cv', 'env', 'tid', 'some job id', 'my start time').time).to eq('my start time')
+  end
+
   it "should be able to set configuration_version" do
     report = Puppet::Transaction::Report.new
     report.configuration_version = "some version"

data/spec/unit/util/at_fork_spec.rb

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ describe 'Puppet::Util::AtFork' do
   describe '.get_handler' do
     context 'when on Solaris' do
       before :each do
-        expect(Facter).to receive(:value).with(:operatingsystem).and_return('Solaris')
+        expect(Puppet::Util::Platform).to receive(:solaris?).and_return(true)
       end
 
       after :each do
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ describe 'Puppet::Util::AtFork' do
 
     context 'when NOT on Solaris' do
       before :each do
-        expect(Facter).to receive(:value).with(:operatingsystem).and_return(nil)
+        expect(Puppet::Util::Platform).to receive(:solaris?).and_return(false)
       end
 
       def stub_noop_handler(namespace_only = false)

data/spec/unit/util/package/version/debian_spec.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'puppet/util/package/version/debian'
+
+describe Puppet::Util::Package::Version::Debian do
+  context "when creating new version should fail" do
+    it "if is parsing symbols" do
+      expect { described_class.parse(:absent) }.to raise_error(described_class::ValidationFailure)
+    end
+  end
+  context "when creating new version" do
+    it "is parsing basic version" do
+      v = described_class.parse('1:20191210.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.2')
+      expect(v.epoch).to eql(1)
+      expect(v.upstream_version).to eql('20191210.1')
+      expect(v.debian_revision).to eql('0ubuntu0.19.04.2')
+    end
+
+    it "is parsing no epoch basic version" do
+      v = described_class.parse('20191210.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.2')
+      expect(v.epoch).to eql(0)
+      expect(v.upstream_version).to eql('20191210.1')
+      expect(v.debian_revision).to eql('0ubuntu0.19.04.2')
+    end
+
+    it "is parsing no debian revision basic version" do
+      v = described_class.parse('2.42.1+19.04')
+      expect(v.epoch).to eql(0)
+      expect(v.upstream_version).to eql('2.42.1+19.04')
+      expect(v.debian_revision).to eql(nil)
+    end
+
+    it "is parsing no epoch complex version" do
+      v = described_class.parse('3.32.2+git20190711-2ubuntu1~19.04.1')
+      expect(v.epoch).to eql(0)
+      expect(v.upstream_version).to eql('3.32.2+git20190711')
+      expect(v.debian_revision).to eql('2ubuntu1~19.04.1')
+    end
+
+    it "is parsing even more complex version" do
+      v = described_class.parse('5:1.0.0+git-20190109.133f4c4-0ubuntu2')
+      expect(v.epoch).to eql(5)
+      expect(v.upstream_version).to eql('1.0.0+git-20190109.133f4c4')
+      expect(v.debian_revision).to eql('0ubuntu2')
+    end
+  end
+  context "when comparing two versions" do
+    it "epoch has precedence" do
+      first = described_class.parse('9:99-99')
+      second = described_class.parse('10:01-01')
+      expect(first < second).to eql(true)
+    end
+    it "handles equals letters-only versions" do
+      lower = described_class.parse('abd-def')
+      higher = described_class.parse('abd-def')
+      expect(lower == higher).to eql(true)
+    end
+    it "shorter version is smaller" do
+      lower = described_class.parse('abd-de')
+      higher = described_class.parse('abd-def')
+      expect(lower < higher).to eql(true)
+    end
+    it "shorter version is smaller even with digits" do
+      lower = described_class.parse('a1b2d-d3e')
+      higher = described_class.parse('a1b2d-d3ef')
+      expect(lower < higher).to eql(true)
+    end
+    it "shorter version is smaller when number is less" do
+      lower = described_class.parse('a1b2d-d9')
+      higher = described_class.parse('a1b2d-d13')
+      expect(lower < higher).to eql(true)
+    end
+    it "handles ~ version" do
+      lower = described_class.parse('a1b2d-d10~')
+      higher = described_class.parse('a1b2d-d10')
+      expect(lower < higher).to eql(true)
+    end
+    it "handles letters versus -" do
+      lower = described_class.parse('a1b2d-d1a')
+      higher = described_class.parse('a1b2d-d1-')
+      expect(lower < higher).to eql(true)
+    end
+  end
+end

data/spec/unit/util/package/version/pip_spec.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,464 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'puppet/util/package/version/pip'
+
+describe Puppet::Util::Package::Version::Pip do
+  describe "initialization" do
+    shared_examples_for 'a valid version' do |input_version, output = input_version|
+      [input_version, input_version.swapcase].each do |input|
+        it "transforms #{input} back to string(#{output}) succesfully" do
+          version = described_class.parse(input)
+          expect(version.to_s).to eq(output)
+        end
+      end
+
+      describe "comparison" do
+        version = described_class.parse(input_version)
+
+        # rubocop:disable UselessComparison
+        it "#{input_version} shouldn't be lesser than itself" do
+          expect(version <  version).to eq(false)
+        end
+
+        it "#{input_version} shouldn't be greater than itself" do
+          expect(version >  version).to eq(false)
+        end
+
+        it "#{input_version} shouldn't be equal with itself" do
+          expect(version != version).to eq(false)
+        end
+
+        it "#{input_version} should be equal to itself" do
+          expect(version == version).to eq(true)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    shared_examples_for 'an invalid version' do |invalid_input|
+      [invalid_input, invalid_input.swapcase].each do |input|
+        it "should not be able to transform #{invalid_input} to string" do
+          expect{ described_class.parse(input) }.to raise_error(described_class::ValidationFailure)
+        end
+      end
+
+      describe "comparison" do
+        valid_version = described_class.parse("1.0")
+
+        it "should raise error when checking if #{invalid_input} is lesser than a valid version" do
+          expect{ valid_version <  invalid_input }.to raise_error(described_class::ValidationFailure)
+        end
+
+        it "should raise error when checking if #{invalid_input} is greater than a valid version" do
+          expect{ valid_version >  invalid_input }.to raise_error(described_class::ValidationFailure)
+        end
+
+        it "should raise error when checking if #{invalid_input} is greater or equal than a valid version" do
+          expect{ valid_version >= invalid_input }.to raise_error(described_class::ValidationFailure)
+        end
+
+        it "should raise error when checking if #{invalid_input} is lesser or equal than a valid version" do
+          expect{ valid_version <= invalid_input }.to raise_error(described_class::ValidationFailure)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe "when only release segment is present in provided version" do
+      context "should work with any number of integer elements" do
+        context "when it has 1 element" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1"
+        end
+        context "when it has 2 elements" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.1"
+        end
+
+        context "when it has 3 elements" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.1.1"
+        end
+
+        context "when it has 4 elements" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.1.1.1"
+        end
+
+        context "when it has 10 elements" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1"
+        end
+      end
+
+      describe "should work with elements which are zero" do
+        context "when it ends with 1 zero" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0"
+        end
+
+        context "when it ends with 2 zeros" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.0"
+        end
+
+        context "when it ends with 3 zeros" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.0.0"
+        end
+
+        context "when it starts with 1 zero" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "0.1"
+        end
+
+        context "when it starts with 2 zeros" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "0.0.1"
+        end
+
+        context "when it starts with 3 zeros" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "0.0.0.1"
+        end
+
+        context "when it is just a zero" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "0"
+        end
+
+        context "when it is full of just zeros" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "0.0.0"
+        end
+      end
+
+      describe "should work with elements containing multiple digits" do
+        context "when it has two digit elements" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.10.1"
+        end
+
+        context "when it has three digit elements" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.101.1.11"
+        end
+
+        context "when it has four digit elements" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "2019.0.11"
+        end
+
+        context "when it has a numerical element starting with zero" do
+          # the zero will dissapear
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.09.10", "1.9.10"
+        end
+
+        context "when it starts with multiple zeros" do
+          # the zeros will dissapear
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "0010.0000.0011", "10.0.11"
+        end
+      end
+
+      context "should fail because of misplaced letters" do
+        context "when it starts with letters" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "d.2"
+          it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "ee.2"
+        end
+
+        context "when it has only letters" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "d.c"
+          it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "dd.c"
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe "when the epoch segment is present in provided version" do
+      context "should work when epoch is an integer" do
+        context "when epoch has 1 digit" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1!1.0.0"
+        end
+
+        context "when epoch has 2 digits" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "10!1.0.0"
+        end
+
+        context "when epoch is zero" do
+          # versions without epoch specified are considered to have epoch 0
+          # it is accepted as input but it should be ignored at output
+          it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "0!1.0.0", "1.0.0"
+        end
+      end
+
+      context "should fail when epoch contains letters" do
+        context "when epoch starts with a letter" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "a9!1.0.0"
+        end
+
+        context "when epoch ends with a letter" do
+          it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "9a!1.0.0"
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe "when the pre-release segment is present in provided version" do
+      context "when pre-release contains the letter a" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0a", "1.0a0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0a0"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release contains the letter b" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0b", "1.0b0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0b0"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release contains the letter c" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0c",  "1.0rc0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0c0", "1.0rc0"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release contains the string alpha" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0alpha",  "1.0a0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0alpha0", "1.0a0"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release contains the string beta" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0beta",  "1.0b0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0beta0", "1.0b0"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release contains the string rc" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0rc",  "1.0rc0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0rc0", "1.0rc0"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release contains the string pre" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0pre",  "1.0rc0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0pre0", "1.0rc0"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release contains the string preview" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0preview",  "1.0rc0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0preview0", "1.0rc0"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release contains multiple zeros at the beginning" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.beta.00",  "1.0b0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.beta.002", "1.0b2"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release elements are separated by dots" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.alpha",   "1.0a0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.alpha.0", "1.0a0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.alpha.2", "1.0a2"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release elements are separated by dashes" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-alpha",   "1.0a0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-alpha-0", "1.0a0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-alpha-2", "1.0a2"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release elements are separated by underscores" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_alpha",   "1.0a0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_alpha_0", "1.0a0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_alpha_2", "1.0a2"
+      end
+
+      context "when pre-release elements are separated by mixed symbols" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-alpha_5", "1.0a5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-alpha.5", "1.0a5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_alpha-5", "1.0a5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_alpha.5", "1.0a5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.alpha-5", "1.0a5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.alpha_5", "1.0a5"
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe "when the post-release segment is present in provided version" do
+      context "when post-release is just an integer" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-9",  "1.0.post9"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-10", "1.0.post10"
+      end
+
+      context "when post-release is just an integer and starts with zero" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-09",  "1.0.post9"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-009", "1.0.post9"
+      end
+
+      context "when post-release contains the string post" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0post",  "1.0.post0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0post0", "1.0.post0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0post1", "1.0.post1"
+        it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "1.0-0.post1"
+      end
+
+      context "when post-release contains the string rev" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0rev",  "1.0.post0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0rev0", "1.0.post0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0rev1", "1.0.post1"
+        it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "1.0-0.rev1"
+      end
+
+      context "when post-release contains the letter r" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0r",  "1.0.post0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0r0", "1.0.post0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0r1", "1.0.post1"
+        it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "1.0-0.r1"
+      end
+
+      context "when post-release elements are separated by dashes" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-post-22", "1.0.post22"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-rev-22",  "1.0.post22"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-r-22",    "1.0.post22"
+      end
+
+      context "when post-release elements are separated by underscores" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_post_22", "1.0.post22"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_rev_22",  "1.0.post22"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_r_22",    "1.0.post22"
+      end
+
+      context "when post-release elements are separated by dots" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.post.22", "1.0.post22"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.rev.22",  "1.0.post22"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.r.22",    "1.0.post22"
+      end
+
+      context "when post-release elements are separated by mixed symbols" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-r_5", "1.0.post5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-r.5", "1.0.post5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_r-5", "1.0.post5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_r.5", "1.0.post5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.r-5", "1.0.post5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.r_5", "1.0.post5"
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe "when the dev release segment is present in provided version" do
+      context "when dev release is only the keyword dev" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0dev",  "1.0.dev0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-dev", "1.0.dev0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_dev", "1.0.dev0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.dev", "1.0.dev0"
+      end
+
+      context "when dev release contains the keyword dev and a number" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0dev2",    "1.0.dev2"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-dev33",  "1.0.dev33"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.dev11",  "1.0.dev11"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_dev101", "1.0.dev101"
+      end
+
+      context "when dev release's number element starts with 0" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0dev02",     "1.0.dev2"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-dev033",   "1.0.dev33"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_dev0101",  "1.0.dev101"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.dev00011", "1.0.dev11"
+      end
+
+      context "when dev release elements are separated by dashes" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-dev",    "1.0.dev0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-dev-2",  "1.0.dev2"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-dev-22", "1.0.dev22"
+      end
+
+      context "when dev release elements are separated by underscores" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_dev",    "1.0.dev0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_dev_2",  "1.0.dev2"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_dev_22", "1.0.dev22"
+      end
+
+      context "when dev release elements are separated by dots" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.dev",    "1.0.dev0"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.dev.2",  "1.0.dev2"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.dev.22", "1.0.dev22"
+      end
+
+      context "when dev release elements are separated by mixed symbols" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-dev_5", "1.0.dev5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0-dev.5", "1.0.dev5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_dev-5", "1.0.dev5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0_dev.5", "1.0.dev5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.dev-5", "1.0.dev5"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0.dev_5", "1.0.dev5"
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe "when the local version segment is present in provided version" do
+      it_should_behave_like 'an invalid version', "1.0+"
+
+      context "when local version is just letters" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+local"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+Local", "1.0+local"
+      end
+
+      context "when local version contains numbers" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+10"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+01",    "1.0+1"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+01L",   "1.0+01l"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+L101L", "1.0+l101l"
+      end
+
+      context "when local version contains multiple elements" do
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+10.local"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+abc.def.ghi"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+01.abc",            "1.0+1.abc"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+01L.0001",          "1.0+01l.1"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+L101L.local",       "1.0+l101l.local"
+        it_should_behave_like 'a valid version', "1.0+dash-undrsc_dot.5", "1.0+dash.undrsc.dot.5"
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "comparison of versions" do
+    # This array must remain sorted (smallest to highest version).
+    versions = [
+      "0.1",
+      "0.10",
+      "0.10.1",
+      "0.10.1.0.1",
+      "1.0.dev456",
+      "1.0a1",
+      "1.0a2.dev456",
+      "1.0a12.dev456",
+      "1.0a12",
+      "1.0b1.dev456",
+      "1.0b2",
+      "1.0b2.post345.dev456",
+      "1.0b2.post345",
+      "1.0b2-346",
+      "1.0c1.dev456",
+      "1.0c1",
+      "1.0rc2",
+      "1.0c3",
+      "1.0",
+      "1.0.post456.dev34",
+      "1.0.post456",
+      "1.1.dev1",
+      "1.2",
+      "1.2+123abc",
+      "1.2+123abc456",
+      "1.2+abc",
+      "1.2+abc123",
+      "1.2+abc123-def2",
+      "1.2+abc123-def2-0",
+      "1.2+abc123def",
+      "1.2+1234.abc",
+      "1.2+123456",
+      "1.2.r32+123456",
+      "1.2.rev33+123456",
+      "1!1.0b2.post345.dev456",
+      "1!1.0",
+      "1!1.0.post456.dev34",
+      "1!1.0.post456",
+      "1!1.2.rev33+123456",
+      "2!2.3.4.alpha5.rev6.dev7+abc89"
+    ]
+
+    it "should find versions list to be already sorted" do
+      sorted_versions = versions.sort do |x,y|
+        described_class.compare(x, y)
+      end
+      expect(versions).to eq(sorted_versions)
+    end
+
+    versions.combination(2).to_a.each do |version_pair|
+      lower_version = described_class.parse(version_pair.first)
+      greater_version = described_class.parse(version_pair.last)
+      
+      it "#{lower_version} should be equal to #{lower_version}" do
+        expect(lower_version == lower_version).to eq(true)
+      end
+
+      it "#{lower_version} should not be equal to #{greater_version}" do
+        expect(lower_version != greater_version).to eq(true)
+      end
+
+      it "#{lower_version} should be lower than #{greater_version}" do
+        expect(lower_version < greater_version).to eq(true)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end