orbitmines-physics 0.0.1.test.2

data/lib/orbitmines/physics/theorems.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"G": {"vacuum.equation": {"theorem": "vacuum.equation", "theory": "G", "asks": "every rule of the theory is a term, and every rule touches two things - the population and the space. What ARE the continuous equations, counted off the rules?", "about": "", "concluded": "\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} = l.balance + l.\\bar{m}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "rule", "via": "ANNIHILATION", "line": "\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} = --2", "working": ["rays: -2", "space: -1", "degree: 2, across an edge", "term: - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n}"], "because": "ANNIHILATION contributes it: its body comes to -2 rays and -1 points of space, its quantifier makes it of degree 2 in the density across an edge, which is the facing factor, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "ANNIHILATION", "line": "\\sigma0n\\tilde{n} = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 1", "degree: 2, across an edge", "term: + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n}"], "because": "ANNIHILATION contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it of degree 2 in the density across an edge, which is the facing factor, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "ANNIHILATION", "line": "\\sigma0n\\tilde{n} = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 1", "degree: 2, across an edge", "term: + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n}"], "because": "ANNIHILATION contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it of degree 2 in the density across an edge, which is the facing factor, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "CREATION", "line": "\\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} = DEG", "working": ["rays: DEG", "space: 0", "degree: 0", "term: + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho}"], "because": "CREATION contributes it: its body comes to DEG rays and 0 points of space, its quantifier makes it carry no power of the density, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "CREATION", "line": "\\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 0", "degree: 0", "term: + \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG}"], "because": "CREATION contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it carry no power of the density, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "CREATION", "line": "\\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 1", "degree: 0", "term: + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}"], "because": "CREATION contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it carry no power of the density, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "MOVEMENT", "line": "\\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 1", "degree: 1", "term: + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "MOVEMENT contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it of degree 1 in the density, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "MOVEMENT", "line": "\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}n = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 0", "degree: 1", "term: + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}n"], "because": "MOVEMENT contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it of degree 1 in the density, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "MOVEMENT", "line": "\\sigma\\omegan = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 0", "degree: 1", "term: + \\sigma\\omegan"], "because": "MOVEMENT contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it of degree 1 in the density, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "MOVEMENT", "line": "\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}n = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 0", "degree: 1", "term: + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}n"], "because": "MOVEMENT contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it of degree 1 in the density, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "ARRIVAL", "line": "\\partial_{t}n = carried", "working": ["rays: 0", "space: 0", "degree: 0", "term: + \\partial_{t}n"], "because": "ARRIVAL contributes it: its body moves the population without making or taking any, its quantifier makes it carry no power of the density, and its gates let through what they let through"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "put in from outside", "line": "\\omegal.\\bar{m} = 1", "working": ["rays: 1", "space: 0", "degree: 0", "term: + \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "no rewrite of the model puts it there - it is what is put into the box from outside, and the only place anything about a particular problem can be written"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "and the terms add", "line": "\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\partial_{t}n = 2·\\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n + \\sigma\\omegan + \\omegal.\\bar{m} - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n}", "working": ["- \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n}   (ANNIHILATION)", "+ \\sigma0n\\tilde{n}   (ANNIHILATION)", "+ \\sigma0n\\tilde{n}   (ANNIHILATION)", "+ \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho}   (CREATION)", "+ \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG}   (CREATION)", "+ \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}   (CREATION)", "+ \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n   (MOVEMENT)", "+ \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}n   (MOVEMENT)", "+ \\sigma\\omegan   (MOVEMENT)", "+ \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}n   (MOVEMENT)", "+ \\partial_{t}n   (ARRIVAL)", "+ \\omegal.\\bar{m}   (not a rule)", "(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules do not consult one another - each fires on its own matches once a tick - so what they do to the population adds, and the line is what they come to rather than a description of them. A theory with a rule taken out writes one term fewer here without anything else changing"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the density is the share of ways lit", "line": "n = \\rho", "working": ["\\rho = \\langle \\min(1, n_{d}) \\rangle_{d} - the lit ways over all DEG of them", "isotropic: every heading alike, so \\langle n_{d} \\rangle_{d} = n", "dilute: at most one ray a way, so \\min(1, n) = n", "so \\rho = n on a heading, and \\rho = n/DEG per point"], "because": "\\rho is not a second population: it is the lit ways of a point over all DEG of them, each way's count clamped to one before it is counted and the whole averaged over the headings - which is what the field computes at every cell. The line's n is the count on one heading. So the two are one name on two conditions. ISOTROPIC: the rules light every exit of a point alike and turn a heading by a record that is the same from every side, so nothing picks a heading out and the average over the headings is the count on any one. DILUTE: a way holds at most one ray, so clamping it to one changes nothing. Both hold in the vacuum the line is about; where a way carries more than one ray, \\rho saturates at one while n keeps counting, and the meeting term the reading writes as n^{2} is the field's \\rho^{2} - one pair per edge per tick. Read per point rather than per heading, n would be the rays over all the ways and the same statement is \\rho = n/DEG, the lattice's count of ways being exactly the factor that stands in l.choose and in front of the creation term"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "with every factor written in", "line": "(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})\\rho = DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m} - \\rho^{2}", "working": ["\\sigma = 1", "\\nu = 1", "\\omega = 1", "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})\\rho = DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m} - \\rho^{2}"], "because": "a name that has a law of its own is not a primitive - it is what that law shows it to be, so it stands in for itself. The constants the rules fix - a rate, which is one per match per tick, the facing factor, which is what isotropy leaves - are filled in here and nowhere earlier, so the line above is what the rules say and this is what it comes to"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "with every factor written in", "line": "\\partial_{t}s = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2} - n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["\\sigma = 1", "\\nu = 1", "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "\\partial_{t}s = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2} - n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}"], "because": "the same rules, read on another ledger: every term that makes or takes a point held at the local - the world's count read from the hub's side, so a swallow is one more here and a hand-back one fewer, and a point the world grows is a new local rather than one held here does so at its own rate, through its own gates, and the count one firing moves is written on it. The constants are the same facts as on the population's line, filled in here the same way"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "with every factor written in", "line": "\\partial_{t}n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2} - n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["\\sigma = 1", "\\nu = 1", "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "\\partial_{t}n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2} - n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}"], "because": "the same rules, read on another ledger: every term that makes or takes a fold of the record does so at its own rate, through its own gates, and the count one firing moves is written on it. The constants are the same facts as on the population's line, filled in here the same way"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record is the space held", "line": "\\partial_{t}s - \\partial_{t}n_{f} = 0", "working": ["\\partial_{t}n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2} - n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "\\partial_{t}s = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2} - n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "\\partial_{t}s - \\partial_{t}n_{f} = 0", "a meeting: one point held, one fold written", "a creation: `if folds[d] > 0` on each of DEG ways is n_{f} folds off; `if held.last != None` is n_{f} points back - the same record, twice", "so s - n_{f} does not move: s = 1 + n_{f}, a local holds itself and one point per fold", "the population's transport, \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} with 1/(1+n_{f}) kept, is steered by that record"], "because": "the same firings move both ledgers, and nothing is handed back by decree. ANNIHILATION folds a point into the hub and writes one fold on the way it came by: one held, one written. CREATION lights every exit and unfolds - and unfolding is gated twice on the same record: a fold comes off a way only `if folds[d] > 0`, and a point comes back only `if held.last != None`, and a hub holds one point per fold it wrote. Read as the shares they are, the ways that lose a fold number n_{f} in expectation and so do the points that come back: the hand-back is what the gates come to on aggregate, not a line in the rule. So the space a local holds and the record it keeps move together, tick for tick, and their difference does not move at all. Integrated, s - n_{f} is a constant, and it is one: a local holds itself and one point per fold. THAT IS WHERE THE POPULATION'S LINE STANDS ON THE SPACE: it never names s, but its transport leans on \\nabla n_{f} and keeps 1/(1 + n_{f}) of a heading, and its room ahead \\omega is the share of ways whose far point is still there - both are the space, read through the record"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the population's line and the record's added", "line": "\\partial_{t}\\paren{\\rho + 2·n_{f}} + \\paren{\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}}\\rho = \\paren{DEG - 2·n_{f}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})\\rho = DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m} - \\rho^{2}", "\\partial_{t}n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2} - n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "a meeting: 2 rays in, one fold out - so the record counts 2 to one", "added: the taking cancels, the making does not - a creation lights every exit whether or not it held a fold", "\\partial_{t}\\paren{\\rho + 2·n_{f}} + \\paren{\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}}\\rho = \\paren{DEG - 2·n_{f}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}"], "because": "ANNIHILATION takes rays and writes a fold - 2 rays a fold, which is the weight the record carries against the population; CREATION takes a fold off and lights every exit. So the vacuum's taking stands on the population's line and, weighed so, on the record's with the opposite sign, and adding the two cancels it exactly - the same count written twice. What is left moves rays-plus-record: the transport carries the rays, a body puts its mass in, and CREATION at a point that held fewer folds than it lights exits makes rays with nothing consumed - which on an expanding world is where the space grows. That last term is kept as it is: at a small scale the record differs from place to place and the sum is not conserved. It is the one term a settled aggregate loses"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record settled against the density", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}", "working": ["\\partial_{t}n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2} - n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}"], "because": "the record's line is linear in the record: folds are written at the meeting rate and taken off at the creation rate times how many there are to take. On the continuous aggregate the record has stopped moving against the density - what a meeting writes a creation takes off - so its line is at nought and the record is a function of the density alone. That is the aggregate: not that the record is conserved, but that it has settled, and every place where it has not is the small-scale dynamics the line above keeps"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record written as the density", "line": "\\partial_{t}\\rho + \\paren{\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\frac{\\rho·\\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}}{\\paren{1 - \\rho}^{2}}}·\\paren{\\nabla \\rho}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}}\\rho = DEG + l.\\bar{m} - DEG·\\rho - \\rho^{2}", "working": ["n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}", "\\nabla n_{f} = \\frac{\\rho·\\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}}{\\paren{1 - \\rho}^{2}}·\\nabla\\rho", "\\partial_{t}\\rho + \\paren{\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\frac{\\rho·\\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}}{\\paren{1 - \\rho}^{2}}}·\\paren{\\nabla \\rho}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}}\\rho = DEG + l.\\bar{m} - DEG·\\rho - \\rho^{2}", "the making against the taking is nought at \\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "with the record settled it is a function of the density, so \\partial_{t}n_{f} is nought and \\nabla n_{f} is the record's slope times \\nabla\\rho - the chain rule, on the line above. Every n_{f} on the right is the same function. What is left is one equation in the density alone, and the term the growth left behind is the vacuum's own restoring term: the making against the taking, which is nought exactly where the vacuum has settled, \\rho = \\rho_{\\infty}, and pushes back everywhere else. Near a body the record is steep and that slope is what bends a heading; far from everything it is flat and the line is a ray carried at \\bar{c}, sourced by the masses"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the vacuum settled", "line": "\\partial_{t}\\paren{\\rho + 2·n_{f}} + \\paren{\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}}\\rho = l.\\bar{m}", "working": ["the vacuum's balance: DEG - DEG·\\rho - \\rho^{2}", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0: the same balance, at nought", "\\partial_{t}\\paren{\\rho + 2·n_{f}} + \\paren{\\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}}}\\rho = l.\\bar{m}"], "because": "with the record written as the density, everything on the right that is not a body's mass is the vacuum's own making against its own taking - the balance that fixes \\rho_{\\infty}, and nought exactly there. The continuous aggregate is the settled vacuum: at that density the growth the general line kept has gone, the record is the settled one, and what is left is CONSERVED up to what carries it and what the bodies put in. The record's gradient stays on the left because that is what bends a heading; every place the record departs from the settled one is the small-scale dynamics the general line keeps"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a heading carries in from behind it", "line": "\\rho_{l}\\paren{t} = \\rho_{\\infty} + \\sum_{R \\ge 0}\\paren{l.reach\\paren{R}·\\bar{m}_{l_{R}}\\paren{t - R}}", "working": ["l_{R}: the local R steps back along -\\hat{d}, as the lattice walks it - through a folded point into its hub", "l.reach\\paren{R}: what is still on the heading R steps later - the rays alone, the near field", "\\bar{m}_{l_{R}}\\paren{t - R}: the mass at the path's end, when the ray left it - nought where no body stands", "\\rho_{l}\\paren{t} = \\rho_{\\infty} + \\sum_{R \\ge 0}\\paren{l.reach\\paren{R}·\\bar{m}_{l_{R}}\\paren{t - R}}"], "because": "the left of the line is a streaming operator: a ray goes one local a tick along its heading, and a heading is turned by the record it crosses. So the line is solved by following a heading BACK along its own path - the walk the lattice gives it, through folded points into their hubs, bent by the turns - and what stands at l on that heading at tick t is what was put in R steps back along the path, R ticks ago, for every R: thinned at each step by the meeting it may have had there, \\sigma F \\rho of the time, and by the share of the heading the turn there did not keep. A step is a tick, so R steps is R ticks. Nothing was added to the line to say this; it is the line read from the ray's side rather than the local's"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "each body from its own distance", "line": "\\rho_{l}\\paren{t} = \\rho_{\\infty} + \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}·x.\\bar{m}}", "working": ["x = x_{@t}: every body at its own time, bound once in the sum - when the rays that reach the local left it, t less x.\\bar{R}; x.\\bar{R} = l.distance\\paren{x.l}, from the local now to the body then", "only the R that land on a body survive the sum: one term each", "x.\\bar{m}: body x's mass - what it is is its own line, and it is never put in here; l.\\bar{m} is kept for the mass AT this local", "\\rho_{l}\\paren{t} = \\rho_{\\infty} + \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}·x.\\bar{m}}"], "because": "the mass at a local is nought unless a body stands there, so of the sum over every R only those terms stand whose path ends on a body - one term per body the heading looks back at, at that body's own distance x.\\bar{R}: the length of the walk from l to where the body WAS, x.\\bar{R} ticks ago, since that is when the ray left it. The distance is implicit in itself, as a retarded one is, and the body's rate and its \\beta are read at that tick too. THIS SUM IS RIGHT WHERE A SUM OF SOURCES WAS WRONG: two bodies cannot share a local, but their rays can, and what arrives adds"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "ignorant of what came before", "line": "\\rho_{l}\\paren{t} = \\rho_{\\infty} + \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}·x.\\bar{m}}", "working": ["the past is infinite and unknown: every field has arrived, no transient - but t stays, in the retardation", "x = x_{@t}: every body at its own time, bound once in the sum - when the rays left it, t less x.\\bar{R}; x.\\bar{R} = l.distance\\paren{x.l}, from the local now to the body then", "along the path the vacuum is settled: \\rho = \\rho_{\\infty}, n_{f} = \\frac{DEG}{2}", "so l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}^{\\bar{R}} along every path", "x.\\bar{m}: each body's mass as it was when the rays left - its own line, never put in here", "\\rho_{l}\\paren{t} = \\rho_{\\infty} + \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}·x.\\bar{m}}"], "because": "nothing is known of the dynamics before the tick the line is read at, and an infinite past is assumed: every body's field has propagated as far as it ever will, so no transient is left in the sum and along every path the vacuum is the settled one - what survives a step is the same at every step: the settled density, and the settled record, which at that density is DEG/2, one fold for every two ways, the record at which a creation takes off exactly what the meetings write. WHAT IS NOT FORGOTTEN IS THE LIGHT'S OWN TRAVEL: a step is a tick, so what reaches the local from body x left it x.\\bar{R} ticks ago, and the body xs read where it WAS then and at the mass it HAD then - its \\beta inside its choice included. The distance is to that place, and is implicit in itself, as a retarded distance is. That is the field of any number of bodies at a local, each from its own distance through whatever space lies between - the distance is the lattice's own walk"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a local feels from every body", "line": "\\paren{\\rho + 2·n_{f}}_{l}\\paren{t} = \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG + \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{\\frac{x.\\bar{m}}{l.shell\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}", "working": ["rays plus record is conserved: what a body puts out is never lost to the vacuum, only spread", "what crosses the shell at x.\\bar{R} in a tick is what the body put out x.\\bar{R} ticks ago: per site, that over l.shell\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}, dwelling 1/\\bar{c}", "the settled vacuum underneath it: \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG", "no l.reach here - that is the rays alone, and is the mass law's own near field", "\\paren{\\rho + 2·n_{f}}_{l}\\paren{t} = \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG + \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{\\frac{x.\\bar{m}}{l.shell\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}"], "because": "the near field is the rays alone, and they are gone in a free path - into the record. But rays and record together the vacuum never loses: a meeting turns 2 rays into a fold, a creation turns a fold back into rays, and the conserved line says so. So what a body puts out is all still there, spread over the space it went into - and from a steady body xt only spreads: what crosses the shell at any distance in a tick is what the body put out, so per site it is the body's mass over that shell, and it dwells one over \\bar{c} there. From every body xt is the sum, each from its own distance - its own walk, on whatever lattice, folded as it may be. That is the force felt at a local: the record it holds above the settled one is what bends every heading through it, and this is where that record came from"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the mass law is the near field of a body's own cells", "line": "\\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\rho·l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}}", "working": ["\\bar{R} in the mass law: the body's depth; x.\\bar{R} in the field: the distance to it", "the skin: l.reach summed over the depth, a geometric series", "so x.\\bar{m} in the field is this, what leaves the face - and the walk outside it is the near field's own l.reach, or, on rays plus record, none", "\\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\rho·l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}}"], "because": "TWO RADII, NOT ONE. In the mass law \\bar{R} is the body's own DEPTH - how many cells thick it is behind its face - and l.reach summed over that depth is the skin: a cell deeper in sends its rays out through the cells in front of it and loses a share at each, so what leaves the face is the near-field sum run over the body's own cells. In the field, x.\\bar{R} is the DISTANCE from the body's face to the local, the walk outside it. Same count per step, since inside a body and outside it the vacuum is the same; a different stretch of it. Putting l.reach in with the depth and again with the distance for the same R would count once what happens twice - so the mass law carries the depth and the near field the distance, and x.\\bar{m} in the sums is what leaves body x's face"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record every body leaves at a local", "line": "n_{f,l}\\paren{t} = \\frac{DEG}{2} + \\frac{\\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·\\paren{\\frac{1}{l.shell\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}} - l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}}{2}", "working": ["far less near: \\paren{\\rho + 2·n_{f}}_{l} - \\rho_{l}, over 2", "x = x_{@t}: every body at its own time, bound once in the sum - when its rays left, t less x.\\bar{R}; x.\\bar{R} = l.distance\\paren{x.l}, from the local now to the body then", "n_{f,l}\\paren{t} = \\frac{DEG}{2} + \\frac{\\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·\\paren{\\frac{1}{l.shell\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}} - l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}}{2}"], "because": "the far field is rays plus record, the near field the rays alone; what is left when the one is taken from the other is the record - the folds every body's rays wrote on their way through this local, over the settled record the vacuum keeps of its own. It is explicit in the bodies: each as it was when its rays left it, at its own distance then, the shell's spreading less what still arrives as rays. Within a free path of a body the two nearly cancel, which is the shadowing; beyond it only the spreading is left. This record is what bends every heading through the local, and its gradient is the pull"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "summed over the locals", "line": "n_{f,l} = \\frac{DEG}{2} + \\frac{\\sum_{l'}\\paren{l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}·\\paren{\\frac{1}{l.shell\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}} - l.reach\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}}}}{2}", "working": ["l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}: the mass at local l' when the rays that reach l left it - l.distance\\paren{l'} ticks ago; nought where no body stood", "n_{f,l} = \\frac{DEG}{2} + \\frac{\\sum_{l'}\\paren{l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}·\\paren{\\frac{1}{l.shell\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}} - l.reach\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}}}}{2}"], "because": "a body is the locals it stands on, and the mass at a local is nought where no body does - so the sum over the bodies is a sum over every local of the lattice, and it is the same sum: only the locals that carry mass contribute. Each local is read at its own time, the tick the rays that reach here left it, l.distance\\paren{l'} ticks ago - a local does not move, so that tick is fixed and nothing is solved for. A body that moves is then a trail of locals each read at a different tick, its mass at each what its choice was then, \\beta inside it: any variation of mass or speed from tick to tick is carried exactly. The bracket is what a unit of mass at that local leaves here - spread over the shell at this local's walk to it, less what still arrives as rays"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "at a particular time", "line": "l'_{@t} = l' \\aside{at} @t", "working": ["l'_{@t}: the source at l', as it was at the tick @t", "l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}: its mass then - its choice at that tick, \\beta inside it", "in the sum over the locals, @t is the tick the rays that reach l left l'"], "because": "the local source l', read at a particular point in time, @t: its mass then - what it lit then, its \\beta then - and nothing about it now. The mark is on the source, not on the equation: a source is a thing with a history, and @t picks one tick of it. What is read at that tick is the source's own line - the choice it makes over its ways. In the record every mass leaves at a local, each source is read at the tick the rays that reach the local left it, which is l.distance\\paren{l'} ticks before now; that is where the sum uses the mark, and it is the only place a tick is picked for it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "following", "line": "\\Delta_{v}f = f_{l + v}\\paren{t + 1} - f_{l}\\paren{t}", "working": ["\\Delta_{v}f = f_{l + v}\\paren{t + 1} - f_{l}\\paren{t}: one step along v, one tick", "\\nabla f: along a way, at one tick", "\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho: across the headings, at one local"], "because": "the difference taken following something: the change per tick seen by whatever moves along v. On the lattice it is exact and it is one step - the value one local along v, a tick later, less the value here now. It is the material derivative, D/Dt, with the velocity marked, since two different velocities stand on the line. Three differences are on the line and they are not the same move: \\Delta_{v} follows v through the lattice, a step and a tick; \\nabla is the difference along a way at one tick, the neighbour less here; \\partial_{\\hat{d}} is the difference across the headings at one local, the next way's density less this one's - no move through space at all"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lean", "line": "a = \\frac{1}{2}\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}", "working": ["a = \\frac{1}{2}\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}: how the heading is being turned", "streaming: \\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} - the density along its heading", "bending: \\Delta_{a}S_{l} - the record along the lean"], "because": "the rate a heading is being turned at the local: half the density's difference across the headings, since the turn draws a folded way against straight on and a fold turns a heading by the weight it was folded, two rays to one. It is a velocity in heading space, and it is the velocity the record is followed along - so the line has two: the heading, which the density streams along, and the lean, which the record is bent along. In the Boltzmann equation these are the streaming term and the force term; here the force is the record's slope, so the second is the bend"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "l.balance = \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}", "working": ["DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}} - \\rho_{l}^{2} = \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}, since \\rho_{\\infty}^{2} = DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}} - checked exact", "l.balance = \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}", "nought where the vacuum has settled; a pull back toward \\rho_{\\infty} elsewhere"], "because": "the vacuum's balance at the local: the making, creation lighting every dark exit of a point, less the taking, the meetings. It is a quadratic in the density, and the settled density is its root - that is what vacuum.occupancy says rho_infty is - so it factors: how far the density here is from settled, times the rate the vacuum pulls it back at, which is the density plus the settled one plus the ways a point has to relight. Positive below the settled density, negative above it: a restoring term. It stands on the population's line as what the vacuum does to the rays, and on the record's with the opposite sign, as what the meetings write above what creation clears - one quantity in both, and its cancelling between them is the conservation of rays plus record"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record the line is written in", "line": "S_{l} \\aside{rays' worth} = 2·n_{f,l}", "working": ["n_{f,l}: the folds ledger at the local - one per point destroyed here, by the way it was destroyed on", "a meeting: 2 rays in, one fold out - so the record counts 2 to one", "S_{l} = 2·n_{f,l}"], "because": "the equation's bending term is read against a record S, and S is the folds ledger in rays' worth: the count of points the meetings have destroyed at this local, weighed by what a meeting costs in rays. ANNIHILATION takes 2 rays and leaves one fold, so a fold is worth 2 rays and the record and the population stand in one unit - which is what lets the balance cancel between their two lines. The weight is read off the rules rather than put here, so a theory whose meeting costs something else moves this with it. Everything else said about the record is a line on this: how it changes a tick (the record's own line) and what it comes to far from every body (the sum over the locals)"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record, in rays' worth", "line": "\\Delta_{t}S_{l} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}} - l.balance", "working": ["S_{l} = 2n_{f,l}: the folds ledger doubled - \\rho_{l}^{2} - S_{l}\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}}", "\\Delta_{t}S_{l} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}} - l.balance: the imbalance with the opposite sign, and the record above DEG cleared", "settled: \\Delta_{t}S_{l} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}; far from every body: the sum over the locals"], "because": "S is twice the record - two, because a meeting turns two rays into one fold, so rays and folds are counted in one unit, rays' worth. Its line is the folds ledger's, doubled: the meetings write it, at the rate rays meet, and creation clears it, at the creation rate times how much there is to clear. Written through the balance: what the meetings write above what creation would clear at the settled record is the vacuum's imbalance, with the opposite sign to the population's line - the same quantity, one line writing what the other takes - and what is left is creation clearing the record above the settled one, DEG, one fold for every two ways, at its own rate. Where the vacuum has settled the first term is gone and the record relaxes to DEG; far from every body it is the sum over the locals of what every mass sent here, each read at its own time - the line under this"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "summed over the locals, settled", "line": "S_{l} = DEG + \\sum_{l'}\\paren{l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}·\\paren{\\frac{1}{l.shell\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}} - l.reach\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}}}", "working": ["l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}: the mass at local l' when the rays that reach l left it - nought where no body stood", "S_{l} = DEG + \\sum_{l'}\\paren{l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}·\\paren{\\frac{1}{l.shell\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}} - l.reach\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}}}"], "because": "the record's line, run out from every mass on the settled vacuum: the settled record, DEG, and over it what every local's mass sent here, each read at the tick its rays left, spread over the shell at this local's walk to it, less the part still in flight as rays. A body is the locals it stands on and the mass at a local is nought where none does, so this is the sum of the masses; a local does not move, so each one's tick is fixed; a body that moves is a trail of locals read at different ticks, so mass and speed may vary per tick exactly. It holds where the vacuum along every path is the settled one - beyond a free path of any body; inside that the record's own line has to be run"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one line for every mass", "line": "\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} = l.balance + l.\\bar{m}", "working": ["\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} = l.balance + l.\\bar{m}", "streaming + bending = the balance + the mass here", "the theorems' roots: the making and the taking (the balance), the source (emission), the transport and its turn (movement, the kernel) - all on this line", "the conserved line, rays plus record, is this plus the record's own line - a consequence"], "because": "the population's own line, with its names: STREAMING, the density followed along its heading - what the ray finds one step on; plus BENDING, the record's slope along the lean - how the record every mass left here turns the heading; equals the vacuum's BALANCE, the making less the taking, which pulls the density back toward the settled one; plus the mass standing here. The balance is kept on the line and not cancelled against the record, because every theorem of this theory stands on it: the settled density is its root, the free path is one over its taking, the mass law is the source through the taking over a body's depth, the screening is the taking along the way - and the transport's turn is the lean. So this is the line the theorems follow from, one step of indirection from the rules: the rules' own terms, with the constants filled in and the record given its name. Adding the record's own line to it cancels the balance and gives the conserved line, rays plus record, which is a consequence and is kept as one. TO FILL IT IN: l.\\bar{m} as a field over the locals and the ticks - where each body stands at each tick and what it lights then - and S from the record's line, or, far from every body, from the sum over the locals"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the vacuum settled", "line": "\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = l.\\bar{m}", "working": ["l.balance = 0 at \\rho_{l} = \\rho_{\\infty}", "\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = l.\\bar{m}", "and the record: \\Delta_{t}S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}"], "because": "where the vacuum has settled, the density is the settled one and the balance is nought: the making pays for the taking exactly, and what the vacuum does to the rays on its own is gone from the line. That is the far field - beyond a free path of every body, where the density along every path is \\rho_{\\infty} - and it is the assumption that the near-field terms do not matter, made once and named. What is left is streaming plus bending equals the mass standing here: the rays are carried, the record every mass left here turns them, and only a body adds anything. The record's line loses its imbalance the same way and relaxes to the settled record at the creation rate"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the vacuum settled", "line": "\\Delta_{t}S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}", "working": ["\\Delta_{t}S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}"], "because": "the record's line at the settled density: the imbalance is nought, and creation clears whatever record stands above the settled one, DEG, at its own rate - so the record relaxes to DEG where nothing is sent, and far from every body what stands above DEG is the sum over the locals of what the masses sent"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bending, read as the pull", "line": "a·\\nabla S_{l} = \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g", "working": ["a = \\frac{1}{2}\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} (vacuum.lean)", "S_{l} = 2n_{f,l}, and TRANSPORT carries a body along \\nabla n_{f}: g = \\frac{1}{2}\\nabla S_{l}", "a·\\nabla S_{l} = \\frac{1}{2}\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·2g = \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g"], "because": "the bending term of the settled line is the lean times the record's slope. The lean is half the density's difference across the headings (vacuum.lean), and the record's slope is what a body is carried along: TRANSPORT leans a body on the folds of the points across each way, so what a body feels, g, is the record's gradient - and the record in rays' worth is twice the folds, so g = \\frac{1}{2}\\nabla S_{l}. Put the two in and the bending is the density's difference across the headings times the pull: g stands on the line's own left side, and that is where the recursion is read from"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the far field, bent", "line": "g \\aside{bent} = \\frac{g_{N}}{1 - \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}", "working": ["\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} = l.\\bar{m} - a·\\nabla S_{l} = l.\\bar{m} - \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g", "\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}: the rays alone - \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}", "g = g_{N} + \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g", "g \\aside{bent} = \\frac{g_{N}}{1 - \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}", "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}} -> 0 past a free path: g -> g_{N}"], "because": "what streams into a local along a heading is the mass there less what the record bends off it: \\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} = l.\\bar{m} - \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g. The difference across the headings is the rays alone, since the vacuum's own rays are alike on every heading and the record sits on the point, not on a heading: it is what the bodies' rays put there, \\rho_{l} - \\rho_{\\infty} = \\sum x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}} (ignorant of what came before). So what a body feels is what arrives, g_{N}, plus that difference times g - and solved for g it is g_{N} over one less the rays' own screened sum. THE ENHANCEMENT IS ON g_{N} AND IT IS SCREENED: l.reach dies in a free path, so beyond one the bending gives the arrival back unchanged. This reading puts no a_{0}/g on the line; whatever the recursion of the force law is, it is not this term far from a body"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record standing against the density here", "line": "S_{l} \\aside{standing} = -\\frac{\\paren{DEG - DEG·\\rho_{l} - \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}}}{\\rho_{l} - 1}", "working": ["\\Delta_{t}S_{l} = 0: \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}} - l.balance = 0", "S_{l} = -\\frac{\\paren{DEG - DEG·\\rho_{l} - l.balance}}{\\rho_{l} - 1}", "l.balance = \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}", "S_{l} = -\\frac{\\paren{DEG - DEG·\\rho_{l} - \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}}}{\\rho_{l} - 1}"], "because": "the record's line at a standstill, \\Delta_{t}S_{l} = 0, is linear in the record: the meetings write it and creation clears what stands above DEG at the share of dark ways here, 1 - \\rho_{l}. Solved for S_{l} it is DEG less the balance over that share - and the balance is how far the density here is from settled times the rate the vacuum pulls it back. Where a body's rays raise the density the balance is negative and the clearing is slow, so the record stands ABOVE DEG by that quotient. Nothing in it is at \\rho_{\\infty}: this is the record where the density is what it is"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the pull off the record standing here", "line": "g \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\frac{\\paren{-\\rho_{\\infty} - \\frac{DEG}{2}}·\\nabla\\rho_{l}}{\\rho_{\\infty} - 1}", "working": ["g = \\frac{1}{2}\\nabla S_{l} = \\frac{1}{2}\\frac{\\partial S_{l}}{\\partial \\rho_{l}}·\\nabla\\rho_{l}", "\\frac{\\partial S_{l}}{\\partial \\rho_{l}} = \\frac{\\paren{\\frac{\\paren{DEG - DEG·\\rho_{l} - \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}}}{\\rho_{l} - 1} - 2·\\rho_{l}}}{\\rho_{l} - 1}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, with \\rho_{\\infty}^{2} = DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}: \\frac{\\paren{-2·\\rho_{\\infty} - DEG}}{\\rho_{\\infty} - 1}", "g \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\frac{\\paren{-\\rho_{\\infty} - \\frac{DEG}{2}}·\\nabla\\rho_{l}}{\\rho_{\\infty} - 1}"], "because": "what a body feels is the record's slope, g = \\frac{1}{2}\\nabla S_{l}, and the record standing here is a function of the density here alone - so its slope is its slope in the density times the density's slope, by the chain rule. Read where the vacuum has settled, the slope in the density is a number of the lattice: the record answers a rise in the density by \\frac{2\\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}, and it is large because the clearing share 1 - \\rho_{\\infty} is small. THAT FACTOR IS WHERE DEG STANDS IN THE FAR FIELD: not in the shape of the curve, which the density's slope sets, but in how much record a given density buys. It is not a_{0}/g either - the density's slope is what the bodies' rays make at the local, screened, so this reading amplifies the near field rather than the arrival at a distance"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "vacuum.at": {"theorem": "vacuum.at", "theory": "G", "asks": "a source is a thing with a history. What does it mean to read one at a particular time?", "about": "l'_{@t}", "concluded": "l'_{@t} = l' \\aside{at} @t", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "at a particular time", "line": "l'_{@t} = l' \\aside{at} @t", "working": ["l'_{@t}: the source at l', as it was at the tick @t", "l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}: its mass then - its choice at that tick, \\beta inside it", "in the sum over the locals, @t is the tick the rays that reach l left l'"], "because": "the local source l', read at a particular point in time, @t: its mass then - what it lit then, its \\beta then - and nothing about it now. The mark is on the source, not on the equation: a source is a thing with a history, and @t picks one tick of it. What is read at that tick is the source's own line - the choice it makes over its ways. In the record every mass leaves at a local, each source is read at the tick the rays that reach the local left it, which is l.distance\\paren{l'} ticks before now; that is where the sum uses the mark, and it is the only place a tick is picked for it"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "vacuum.following": {"theorem": "vacuum.following", "theory": "G", "asks": "a difference taken following something - what does one step of the lattice come to, and what is followed?", "about": "\\Delta_{v}f", "concluded": "\\Delta_{v}f = f_{l + v}\\paren{t + 1} - f_{l}\\paren{t}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "following", "line": "\\Delta_{v}f = f_{l + v}\\paren{t + 1} - f_{l}\\paren{t}", "working": ["\\Delta_{v}f = f_{l + v}\\paren{t + 1} - f_{l}\\paren{t}: one step along v, one tick", "\\nabla f: along a way, at one tick", "\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho: across the headings, at one local"], "because": "the difference taken following something: the change per tick seen by whatever moves along v. On the lattice it is exact and it is one step - the value one local along v, a tick later, less the value here now. It is the material derivative, D/Dt, with the velocity marked, since two different velocities stand on the line. Three differences are on the line and they are not the same move: \\Delta_{v} follows v through the lattice, a step and a tick; \\nabla is the difference along a way at one tick, the neighbour less here; \\partial_{\\hat{d}} is the difference across the headings at one local, the next way's density less this one's - no move through space at all"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "vacuum.lean": {"theorem": "vacuum.lean", "theory": "G", "asks": "the record bends a heading. Along what, and how fast?", "about": "a", "concluded": "a = \\frac{1}{2}\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lean", "line": "a = \\frac{1}{2}\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}", "working": ["a = \\frac{1}{2}\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}: how the heading is being turned", "streaming: \\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} - the density along its heading", "bending: \\Delta_{a}S_{l} - the record along the lean"], "because": "the rate a heading is being turned at the local: half the density's difference across the headings, since the turn draws a folded way against straight on and a fold turns a heading by the weight it was folded, two rays to one. It is a velocity in heading space, and it is the velocity the record is followed along - so the line has two: the heading, which the density streams along, and the lean, which the record is bent along. In the Boltzmann equation these are the streaming term and the force term; here the force is the record's slope, so the second is the bend"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "vacuum.balance": {"theorem": "vacuum.balance", "theory": "G", "asks": "the vacuum makes and takes at once. What does the difference come to at a local, and which way does it push?", "about": "l.balance", "concluded": "l.balance = \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "l.balance = \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}", "working": ["DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}} - \\rho_{l}^{2} = \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}, since \\rho_{\\infty}^{2} = DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}} - checked exact", "l.balance = \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}", "nought where the vacuum has settled; a pull back toward \\rho_{\\infty} elsewhere"], "because": "the vacuum's balance at the local: the making, creation lighting every dark exit of a point, less the taking, the meetings. It is a quadratic in the density, and the settled density is its root - that is what vacuum.occupancy says rho_infty is - so it factors: how far the density here is from settled, times the rate the vacuum pulls it back at, which is the density plus the settled one plus the ways a point has to relight. Positive below the settled density, negative above it: a restoring term. It stands on the population's line as what the vacuum does to the rays, and on the record's with the opposite sign, as what the meetings write above what creation clears - one quantity in both, and its cancelling between them is the conservation of rays plus record"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\rho_{\\infty}", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "DEG", "is": "the rays count of what is made", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION fires at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}, and ONE firing of it puts DEG into the rays ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "vacuum.settled": {"theorem": "vacuum.settled", "theory": "G", "asks": "and where the vacuum has settled, so that the near-field terms do not matter - what is left of the line?", "about": "\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty}", "concluded": "\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = l.\\bar{m}", "beneath": [], "also": "\\Delta_{t}S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}", "leads": "THE FAR FIELD: streaming plus bending equals the mass standing here. The vacuum's own balance is gone from the line, because at the settled density the making pays for the taking exactly.", "then": "AND THE RECORD THERE: creation clears whatever stands above the settled record at its own rate, so far from every body what stands above it is what the masses sent.", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the vacuum settled", "line": "\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = l.\\bar{m}", "working": ["l.balance = 0 at \\rho_{l} = \\rho_{\\infty}", "\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} + a·\\nabla S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = l.\\bar{m}", "and the record: \\Delta_{t}S_{l} \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}"], "because": "where the vacuum has settled, the density is the settled one and the balance is nought: the making pays for the taking exactly, and what the vacuum does to the rays on its own is gone from the line. That is the far field - beyond a free path of every body, where the density along every path is \\rho_{\\infty} - and it is the assumption that the near-field terms do not matter, made once and named. What is left is streaming plus bending equals the mass standing here: the rays are carried, the record every mass left here turns them, and only a body adds anything. The record's line loses its imbalance the same way and relaxes to the settled record at the creation rate"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}], "parts": []}, "vacuum.worth": {"theorem": "vacuum.worth", "theory": "G", "asks": "the equation is written against a record S. What IS that, at a local - and where does it come from?", "about": "S_{l} \\aside{rays' worth}", "concluded": "S_{l} \\aside{rays' worth} = 2·n_{f,l}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record the line is written in", "line": "S_{l} \\aside{rays' worth} = 2·n_{f,l}", "working": ["n_{f,l}: the folds ledger at the local - one per point destroyed here, by the way it was destroyed on", "a meeting: 2 rays in, one fold out - so the record counts 2 to one", "S_{l} = 2·n_{f,l}"], "because": "the equation's bending term is read against a record S, and S is the folds ledger in rays' worth: the count of points the meetings have destroyed at this local, weighed by what a meeting costs in rays. ANNIHILATION takes 2 rays and leaves one fold, so a fold is worth 2 rays and the record and the population stand in one unit - which is what lets the balance cancel between their two lines. The weight is read off the rules rather than put here, so a theory whose meeting costs something else moves this with it. Everything else said about the record is a line on this: how it changes a tick (the record's own line) and what it comes to far from every body (the sum over the locals)"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": [{"part": "2", "is": "what bodies' rays grow where they meet", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. ANNIHILATION read on two bodies' rays: each still leaves the point behind it where the way behind is dark, and behind a body's ray - lit by a source, not by CREATE, and met in the vacuum's dark half - nothing stands, so both gates are open"}]}, "vacuum.record": {"theorem": "vacuum.record", "theory": "G", "asks": "the record every mass leaves at a local, in rays' worth - what writes it, what clears it, and what does it come to far from every body?", "about": "\\Delta_{t}S_{l}", "concluded": "\\Delta_{t}S_{l} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}} - l.balance", "beneath": [], "also": "S_{l} = DEG + \\sum_{l'}\\paren{l'_{@t}.\\bar{m}·\\paren{\\frac{1}{l.shell\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}} - l.reach\\paren{l.distance\\paren{l'}}}}", "leads": "THE RECORD'S OWN LINE - written by the meetings, cleared by creation at its own rate times how much there is to clear. This is what the record does at any local, near a body or far, and it is exact.", "then": "AND WHAT IT SETTLES TO FAR FROM EVERY BODY, where the vacuum along every path is the settled one: the sum over the locals of what every mass sent here, each read at its own time. Inside a free path of a body the line above has to be run instead.", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the record, in rays' worth", "line": "\\Delta_{t}S_{l} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}} - l.balance", "working": ["S_{l} = 2n_{f,l}: the folds ledger doubled - \\rho_{l}^{2} - S_{l}\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}}", "\\Delta_{t}S_{l} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho_{l}} - l.balance: the imbalance with the opposite sign, and the record above DEG cleared", "settled: \\Delta_{t}S_{l} = \\paren{DEG - S_{l}}\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}; far from every body: the sum over the locals"], "because": "S is twice the record - two, because a meeting turns two rays into one fold, so rays and folds are counted in one unit, rays' worth. Its line is the folds ledger's, doubled: the meetings write it, at the rate rays meet, and creation clears it, at the creation rate times how much there is to clear. Written through the balance: what the meetings write above what creation would clear at the settled record is the vacuum's imbalance, with the opposite sign to the population's line - the same quantity, one line writing what the other takes - and what is left is creation clearing the record above the settled one, DEG, one fold for every two ways, at its own rate. Where the vacuum has settled the first term is gone and the record relaxes to DEG; far from every body it is the sum over the locals of what every mass sent here, each read at its own time - the line under this"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": [{"part": "DEG", "is": "the rays count of what is made", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION fires at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}, and ONE firing of it puts DEG into the rays ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "gravity.bent": {"theorem": "gravity.bent", "theory": "G", "asks": "the record's slope turns the vacuum's own rays toward a mass. Read off the settled line, what does that bending add to what a body feels - and does it reach far?", "about": "g \\aside{bent}", "concluded": "g \\aside{bent} = \\frac{g_{N}}{1 - \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}", "beneath": [], "also": "a·\\nabla S_{l} = \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g", "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the far field, bent", "line": "g \\aside{bent} = \\frac{g_{N}}{1 - \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}", "working": ["\\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} = l.\\bar{m} - a·\\nabla S_{l} = l.\\bar{m} - \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g", "\\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}: the rays alone - \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}", "g = g_{N} + \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g", "g \\aside{bent} = \\frac{g_{N}}{1 - \\sum_{x = x_{@t}}\\paren{x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}}}}", "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}} -> 0 past a free path: g -> g_{N}"], "because": "what streams into a local along a heading is the mass there less what the record bends off it: \\Delta_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l} = l.\\bar{m} - \\partial_{\\hat{d}}\\rho_{l}·g. The difference across the headings is the rays alone, since the vacuum's own rays are alike on every heading and the record sits on the point, not on a heading: it is what the bodies' rays put there, \\rho_{l} - \\rho_{\\infty} = \\sum x.\\bar{m}·l.reach\\paren{x.\\bar{R}} (ignorant of what came before). So what a body feels is what arrives, g_{N}, plus that difference times g - and solved for g it is g_{N} over one less the rays' own screened sum. THE ENHANCEMENT IS ON g_{N} AND IT IS SCREENED: l.reach dies in a free path, so beyond one the bending gives the arrival back unchanged. This reading puts no a_{0}/g on the line; whatever the recursion of the force law is, it is not this term far from a body"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "g_{N}", "is": "\\text{the vacuum's channel} + \\text{the meetings' channel}", "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"name": "the vacuum's channel", "is": "\\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "because": "the near body prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. NEITHER BODY HAS TO EMIT ANYTHING for this one - it is the making that did not happen, carried out to R and met by whatever is open to it"}, {"name": "the meetings' channel", "is": "\\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{\\text{met(R)} + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic: one body's radiation meeting the other's. It needs BOTH to be shining, which is why it carries both masses and the motion factor twice"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "met(R)", "is": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "gravity.standing": {"theorem": "gravity.standing", "theory": "G", "asks": "the record above DEG is cleared at the share of dark ways, and a body's rays take that share away. What record stands against the density here, and what pull is its slope - where does the lattice stand in it?", "about": "g \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty}", "concluded": "g \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\frac{\\paren{-\\rho_{\\infty} - \\frac{DEG}{2}}·\\nabla\\rho_{l}}{\\rho_{\\infty} - 1}", "beneath": [], "also": "S_{l} \\aside{standing} = -\\frac{\\paren{DEG - DEG·\\rho_{l} - \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}}}{\\rho_{l} - 1}", "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the pull off the record standing here", "line": "g \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\frac{\\paren{-\\rho_{\\infty} - \\frac{DEG}{2}}·\\nabla\\rho_{l}}{\\rho_{\\infty} - 1}", "working": ["g = \\frac{1}{2}\\nabla S_{l} = \\frac{1}{2}\\frac{\\partial S_{l}}{\\partial \\rho_{l}}·\\nabla\\rho_{l}", "\\frac{\\partial S_{l}}{\\partial \\rho_{l}} = \\frac{\\paren{\\frac{\\paren{DEG - DEG·\\rho_{l} - \\paren{\\rho_{\\infty} - \\rho_{l}}·\\paren{\\rho_{l} + \\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}}}{\\rho_{l} - 1} - 2·\\rho_{l}}}{\\rho_{l} - 1}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, with \\rho_{\\infty}^{2} = DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}: \\frac{\\paren{-2·\\rho_{\\infty} - DEG}}{\\rho_{\\infty} - 1}", "g \\aside{at} \\rho_{\\infty} = \\frac{\\paren{-\\rho_{\\infty} - \\frac{DEG}{2}}·\\nabla\\rho_{l}}{\\rho_{\\infty} - 1}"], "because": "what a body feels is the record's slope, g = \\frac{1}{2}\\nabla S_{l}, and the record standing here is a function of the density here alone - so its slope is its slope in the density times the density's slope, by the chain rule. Read where the vacuum has settled, the slope in the density is a number of the lattice: the record answers a rise in the density by \\frac{2\\rho_{\\infty} + DEG}{1 - \\rho_{\\infty}}, and it is large because the clearing share 1 - \\rho_{\\infty} is small. THAT FACTOR IS WHERE DEG STANDS IN THE FAR FIELD: not in the shape of the curve, which the density's slope sets, but in how much record a given density buys. It is not a_{0}/g either - the density's slope is what the bodies' rays make at the local, screened, so this reading amplifies the near field rather than the arrival at a distance"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\rho_{\\infty}", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "DEG", "is": "the rays count of what is made", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION fires at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}, and ONE firing of it puts DEG into the rays ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "gravity.coincidence": {"theorem": "gravity.coincidence", "theory": "G", "asks": "the scale a rotation curve turns over at and the rate the world expands at are both rates of the one vacuum. What is their ratio - and which lattice puts it where it is measured?", "about": "\\frac{a_{0}}{cH}", "concluded": "\\frac{a_{0}}{cH} = \\frac{\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·\\paren{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2}}}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\varepsilon = 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\varepsilon, which stands on every term of it alike", "\\varepsilon = 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}, a placeholder until derived"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what the empty vacuum grows on its own, per point per tick: a vacuum ray meeting with the way behind it not lit in the same event. Not yet derived from the rules - put in, at the rate the meetings were read to grow at before"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rate the empty vacuum expands at", "line": "H_{\\Lambda} = \\frac{2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{D}", "working": ["H_{\\Lambda} = \\varepsilon/D"], "because": "of what the world grows by, the part the empty vacuum grows on its own: it does not thin as the matter does, so it is the same rate at every epoch - a cosmological constant, and the one rate a scale can be set by"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "a_{0} = \\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "working": ["the scale is set by what does not change: the empty vacuum's own growth", "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "H_{\\Lambda} = \\frac{2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{D}", "a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda} = \\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}"], "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the space line nets = \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the space line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into space -1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into space 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into space 1", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into space 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into space 0", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into space 1", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into space 1", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into space 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the space ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what the waiting makes = \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density", "no rays, 1 of space", "the waiting makes \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. MOVEMENT hands the ray to itself and grows the world - no ray made, destroyed or moved, and a point of space where there was none. That is a carrier standing still to make the room it could not step into, and the rate it does so at is \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the room the line does not supply, which the waiting has to make", "line": "the rate space is made = \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho", "working": ["the space line carries a term with no rays in it: the waiting", "a ray that cannot step makes the room instead, and that is space at \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho", "the rate space is made = \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho"], "because": "MOVEMENT sends a ray with nowhere to step to waitForRoom, which hands it back to itself and grows the world by a point - no ray made, destroyed or moved, and space where there was none. Nothing else in these rules has that shape, so that term IS the waiting, and its rate is the rate a ray tries to step times the chance its way out is taken. NOTHING IS FITTED HERE: it is one term of the space line read off as it stands, and it is the only scale in this theory that is not a count of the tiling"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what bodies' rays grow where they meet = 2", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what bodies' rays grow where they meet, which stands on every term of it alike", "behind a vacuum ray: the ray CREATE lit with it, so nothing is grown", "behind a body's ray in the dark half: nothing, so a point is grown", "grown a meeting = 2"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. ANNIHILATION read on two bodies' rays: each still leaves the point behind it where the way behind is dark, and behind a body's ray - lit by a source, not by CREATE, and met in the vacuum's dark half - nothing stands, so both gates are open"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{n} = 0", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\bar{n}, which stands on every term of it alike", "\\bar{n} = 0 in the empty vacuum, an input where a world is asked about"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. how much of a way carries some body's ray, on the world's mean - a fact about what the world holds, not about its rules, so it is put in; in the settled vacuum, with no body in it, it is nought"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "ANNIHILATION", "line": "the world's matter grows = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2}", "working": ["\\sigma F \\bar{n}^{2}: two bodies' rays facing on a way", "times 2 grown a meeting", "= 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2}"], "because": "two bodies' rays meet as any two rays do - at the rate, facing, each end carrying - and each such meeting grows what the rule read on bodies' rays says: per point per tick, that is how much the world grows"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rate the whole of it expands at", "line": "H = \\frac{\\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}}{D}", "working": ["every point makes a_{0} = \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho a tick", "inside R there are R^{D} of them, so \\dot{V} = a_{0}V with V \\propto R^{D}", "DR^{D-1}\\dot{R} = a_{0}R^{D}", "H = (what the space line nets + what the world's matter grows + what the empty vacuum grows)/D = \\frac{\\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}}{D}"], "because": "every point makes a_{0} of room a tick, so what is inside a radius grows at that times how many points there are - which ehrhart counted as R^{D}. Turning a growth in ROOM into a growth in RADIUS goes through that count, and it leaves a_{0}/D rather than a_{0}. Reading recession/R instead gives the rate along a LINE, which is what receding is about and is not what a Hubble rate stands: the line has R points in it and the ball has R^{D}, and the difference is a count of the tiling"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the acceleration the expansion builds", "line": "cH = \\frac{\\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}}{D}", "working": ["\\bar{c} = 1 cell a tick", "H = \\frac{\\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}}{D}", "cH = \\frac{\\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}}{D}", "and the turnover measured is ~2\\pi under this - a count these rules do not carry"], "because": "the expansion has a rate and the lattice has a speed, and there is only one of each: an acceleration built from them is their product and nothing in it was chosen. WHERE A ROTATION CURVE ACTUALLY TURNS OVER is about 2\\pi below this, and that count is NOT among these rules - it belongs to a rule about phase, and there is no phase in splitting, meeting, streaming or arrival. So this is where the derivation stops, and the factor between it and the measurement is named rather than absorbed"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the scale against the expansion", "line": "\\frac{a_{0}}{cH} = \\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·\\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}}", "working": ["a_{0} = \\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "cH = \\frac{\\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}}{D}", "\\frac{a_{0}}{cH} = \\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·\\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}}", "measured: a_{0} = 1.1 to 1.3 \\cdot 10^{-10} m/s^{2}, H_{0} = 67.4 to 73.0 km/s/Mpc"], "because": "a_{0} is v/\\lambda, how long a carrier lasts, and cH is what the space line nets over D, how fast the whole of it grows. Both are in ticks, so their ratio is a pure number, and it is fixed by the vacuum's settled state alone: the occupancy, the record and the lattice's ways. It is the one place the absolute scale of a_{0} is observable at all - a rotation curve read in its own a_{0} is the same on every lattice - and measured it is a_{0}/cH_{0} = 0.155 to 0.183 across the published a_{0} and H_{0}, about 1/2\\pi"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\bar{n}", "is": "0", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. how much of a way carries some body's ray, on the world's mean - a fact about what the world holds, not about its rules, so it is put in; in the settled vacuum, with no body in it, it is nought"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "2", "is": "what bodies' rays grow where they meet", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. ANNIHILATION read on two bodies' rays: each still leaves the point behind it where the way behind is dark, and behind a body's ray - lit by a source, not by CREATE, and met in the vacuum's dark half - nothing stands, so both gates are open"}, {"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}, {"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "\\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho", "is": "what the waiting makes", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. MOVEMENT hands the ray to itself and grows the world - no ray made, destroyed or moved, and a point of space where there was none. That is a carrier standing still to make the room it could not step into, and the rate it does so at is \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho"}, {"part": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2}", "is": "the world's matter grows", "because": "two bodies' rays meet as any two rays do - at the rate, facing, each end carrying - and each such meeting grows what the rule read on bodies' rays says: per point per tick, that is how much the world grows"}, {"part": "2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}", "is": "\\varepsilon", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what the empty vacuum grows on its own, per point per tick: a vacuum ray meeting with the way behind it not lit in the same event. Not yet derived from the rules - put in, at the rate the meetings were read to grow at before"}]}, "vacuum.occupancy": {"theorem": "vacuum.occupancy", "theory": "G", "asks": "the vacuum makes and takes at once. Left alone, where does it settle - and is that a number the rules fix, or one somebody chose?", "about": "\\rho_{\\infty}", "concluded": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - \\rho^{2} = 0", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}], "parts": []}, "force.range": {"theorem": "force.range", "theory": "G", "asks": "a carrier is destroyed when it meets something. How far does ONE of them get before that happens?", "about": "\\lambda", "concluded": "\\lambda = \\frac{2}{\\rho}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}], "parts": []}, "transport.speed": {"theorem": "transport.speed", "theory": "G", "asks": "MOVEMENT says a ray goes one cell a tick, and then says what happens when there is no cell. How fast does a carrier actually go?", "about": "v", "concluded": "v = \\frac{1}{n_{f} + 1}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}]}, "transport.thinning": {"theorem": "transport.thinning", "theory": "G", "asks": "a medium carries something outward from a source, and its carriers may have to make the room they cross. How thick is it at r steps?", "about": "n", "concluded": "n = \\Phi·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what crosses a shell is the room times what is at each site times how fast it goes", "line": "n = \\frac{\\Phi·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["\\Phi = shell·n·v", "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n = \\Phi/(shell·v) = \\frac{\\Phi·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}, which grows with how far a ray has come"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in a tick - the sites on it, what is at each, and the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried. Solved for what is AT a site it is the flux over the room over the speed, and the speed is the share of the draw that did not turn. THE FOLD RECORD IS WHAT MAKES THIS MORE THAN A DILUTION: it grows with how far a ray has come, so 1 + n_{f} rises outward and the density falls more slowly than the room alone would have it. Close in that is nothing and this is an inverse square; far out it is not"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\Phi", "is": "\\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\text{T_{met}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\bar{m}", "is": "\\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "the mass is what a body announces per unit of the face it announces through, at the size where its own depth has stopped mattering - which is a limit, and is written as one"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "T_{met}", "is": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}]}, "gravity.falloff": {"theorem": "gravity.falloff", "theory": "G", "asks": "a shortfall spreads out from a body. How does what reaches a distance depend on that distance, and on what else?", "about": "\\delta screened", "concluded": "\\delta screened = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "\\delta", "is": "the flux through any shell", "because": "GAUSS'S LAW, and it comes out as an identity rather than a postulate. Count what crosses a shell in one tick: the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward. `spreading` has all three and `MOVEMENT` neither makes nor destroys, so the product is the SOURCE and is the same at every radius - which is what a flux law says. General relativity gets the same statement out of the Bianchi identity; here it is arithmetic"}, {"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}]}, "gravity.reach": {"theorem": "gravity.reach", "theory": "G", "asks": "every body in the world is casting a shortfall everywhere. Adding up what all of them put on you, is there a total?", "about": "the ambient field", "concluded": "the ambient field = \\infty", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "adding it up over every shell", "line": "the ambient field = \\infty", "working": ["\\sum_{r} shell(r)·\\delta(r) = \\sum_{r} r^{D - 1}·\\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "the two cancel: = \\sum_{r} 1", "which has no total"], "because": "the r^{-(D-1)} in the falloff and the r^{D-1} in the shell cancel exactly, so every shell contributes alike and the sum over unboundedly many of them has no total. Nothing in the line pushes a discrepancy back, so there is no screening length to cut it off - which is Olbers' paradox standing, and it is what these rules give"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "gravity.horizon": {"theorem": "gravity.horizon", "theory": "G", "asks": "the shortfall grows without limit as a body is approached, and a point has only so many exits to be missing. What happens where the two meet?", "about": "S at the horizon", "concluded": "S at the horizon = DEG·r^{D - 1}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the ways out of a point = DEG", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density", "the body lit DEG exits", "so a point has DEG ways out"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION lights every exit a point has, so the count its body ran over is how many ways out there are - DEG. A shortfall is ways out that are missing, so that count is also its ceiling"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the falloff meets the ceiling", "line": "S at the horizon = DEG·r^{D - 1}", "working": ["\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\delta per site \\le DEG, the ways out a point has", "S = DEG·r^{D - 1}", "so on three dimensions a mass goes as the AREA of its horizon, not as its radius"], "because": "the shortfall per site goes as S/r^{D-1} and cannot exceed DEG, the ways out a point has. Setting the two equal and solving for the SOURCE rather than for the radius - because one over a linear form in D is not a linear form in D, and these exponents stay linear so a law survives changing the lattice - gives the strength needed to put a horizon at r as the ceiling times the room out there"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": [{"part": "DEG", "is": "the rays count of what is made", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION fires at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}, and ONE firing of it puts DEG into the rays ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "gravity.index": {"theorem": "gravity.index", "theory": "G", "asks": "one term of the line swings a heading. What refractive index is that, and what does it come to at a distance from a body?", "about": "N in r", "concluded": "N in r = \\frac{1}{\\frac{-2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\rho} + 1}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what swings a heading = \\nabla n_{f}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what swings a heading, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line's direction term is the kernel's first moment - which way a turn leans on average"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place stands for, counted off what a fold does", "line": "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}", "working": ["a ray crosses where it stands: one tick per point the place stands for", "fold joins what was behind each point onto the other, so the count is transitive", "folds along the path: \\delta n_{f}", "N = 1 + n_{f} + n_{f}^{2} + ... = \\frac{1}{1 - n_{f}}", "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere, one tick per point the place stands for - so the index IS that count. What the count is comes off `fold`, which joins what was behind each of the two points onto the other: a place that swallows another inherits what THAT place stood for, including whatever it had already swallowed. So it is a sum over CHAINS of folds rather than a tally of them, which is geometric and comes to 1/(1 - n). It converges because `unfold` hands a point back at every free point, so the chains are cut off by the same balance the space ledger is written in. Continuum ray optics would exponentiate here instead - that is the right sum where a path picks up a little at a time, and this lattice folds a whole point at a time"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "substituting", "line": "N in r = \\frac{1}{1 - \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}}", "working": ["N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}", "\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}}"], "because": "\\delta n_{f} is not a primitive here - it is what the line above shows it to be, so it stands in for itself"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "is": "l.\\bar{m}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}, {"part": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "is": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}]}, "gravity.bending": {"theorem": "gravity.bending", "theory": "G", "asks": "light crossing a body's field is turned by it. How far, and is that the Newtonian answer or twice it?", "about": "\\alpha", "concluded": "\\alpha = \\frac{4·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}^{\\bar{R}}}·b^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\rho}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the integral of the index across the path", "line": "\\alpha = \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·b^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "the fold record along the path: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "the leans added up over the pass, r = \\sqrt{b^{2}+s^{2}}", "and \\int \\partial_{b}(r^{-k})\\,dl = 2·b^{-k} for the inverse power a potential has", "\\alpha = \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·b^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "the index is what the fold record integrates to, and a ray passing at b feels its gradient across the whole path. Integrated, that comes to TWICE the record at closest approach - and that factor of two is the space part of the metric rather than an adjustment to the time part, which is what separates this from the Newtonian answer"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}], "parts": [{"part": "2", "is": "what bodies' rays grow where they meet", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. ANNIHILATION read on two bodies' rays: each still leaves the point behind it where the way behind is dark, and behind a body's ray - lit by a source, not by CREATE, and met in the vacuum's dark half - nothing stands, so both gates are open"}, {"part": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "is": "l.\\bar{m}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}, {"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "is": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}]}, "vacuum.facing": {"theorem": "vacuum.facing", "theory": "G", "asks": "a meeting is with what is coming the OTHER way. What does that come to in a vacuum with no bias in it?", "about": "F", "concluded": "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "isotropy leaves no mean heading", "line": "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "working": ["F = (1 - d^·j^)/2", "j^ = 0 where nothing is biased", "F = 1/2"], "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "gravity.motion": {"theorem": "gravity.motion", "theory": "G", "asks": "a body gets one action a tick and can move or shine, not both. What does that do to the pull between two of them?", "about": "how motion moves it", "concluded": "how motion moves it = \\paren{1 - \\beta}^{2}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel - what the near body prevents, CARRIED as the \\delta that spreads rather than multiplied onto it afterwards, over what the far one is open to:", "  S = 0,  thinned \\frac{\\delta·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega},  open to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "  = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "the meetings' channel - the two bodies' own radiation, meeting:", "  = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "and the expansion is not a third - it is the same shortfall where nothing is in the way", "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}", "working": ["CREATION: fires at a free point, lights every exit -> the vacuum pulses, period two", "propel + EMISSION: a source moves or pulses, never both -> the second pulse", "an emission r cells out arrives r ticks later, so meeting the vacuum's rays is a parity", "each move flips it, opposite ways fore and aft", "constant speed: the flips cancel.  accelerating: they accumulate, at g", "a flip counts only while the carrier lasts, which is one mean free path", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma\\omega\\rho), and the time to cross it is \\lambda/v", "an accelerating source displaces \\frac{1}{2}g\\lambda^{2} over it - that many flips", "g\\lambda is the only dimensionless combination; g\\lambda diverges, 1/(g\\lambda) turns over", "g = g_{N}(1 + 1/(g\\lambda)),  and a_{0} = 1/\\lambda", "g^{2} - g_{N}g - g_{N}a_{0} = 0", "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "CREATION fires only where nothing is going on and lights every exit, so a point fires, fills, drains and fires - the vacuum pulses every other tick. And a source moves or pulses and never both, which is what puts (1-\\beta) on the line. So there are two pulses and moving shifts the phase between them: an emission reaches a place r cells away after r ticks, and whether it arrives while the vacuum there is lit - and is doused by the meeting rule - is a parity. Each move flips it, and moving toward a place shortens the path where moving away lengthens it, so the flip goes opposite ways fore and aft. AT A CONSTANT SPEED THOSE CANCEL; under an acceleration they accumulate, because the rate of flipping keeps changing - and what a body accelerates at is g itself. That is what puts g on the right-hand side. Measured against the only rate the vacuum has it is a_{0}/g, and solving is the one place here where anything is solved rather than assembled: strong field gives back g_{N} exactly, weak field the GEOMETRIC MEAN of what arrives and the rate space is made - so g carries the ROOT of the mass g_{N} carries whole"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one action a tick does to a moving body", "line": "how motion moves it = \\paren{1 - \\beta}^{2}", "working": ["what a body puts out: l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "the meetings channel needs both: (1-\\beta)^{2}", "the vacuum's channel needs neither: 1"], "because": "the meetings channel is one body's radiation meeting the other's, so it needs both to be shining and carries the share twice. The vacuum's channel needs neither to emit anything - an inert body suppresses the expansion just by sitting there - so it carries none of it. Gravity between things in motion is therefore weaker, and weaker in ONE of its two channels, which is a thing that could be looked for"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "gravity.suppression": {"theorem": "gravity.suppression", "theory": "G", "asks": "every cell of a body prevents an expansion. Does the pull go as its bulk or as its surface - and does anything in these rules decide?", "about": "what a body puts into the medium", "concluded": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\rho}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}], "parts": [{"part": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "is": "l.\\bar{m}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}, {"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "is": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}]}, "gravity.absorbing": {"theorem": "gravity.absorbing", "theory": "G", "asks": "a body sitting in a field is a region rather than a point. How much of what is there does it actually receive?", "about": "what a body is open to", "concluded": "what a body is open to = \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\rho}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}], "parts": [{"part": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "is": "l.\\bar{m}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}, {"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "vacuum.crowding": {"theorem": "vacuum.crowding", "theory": "G", "asks": "the settled density solves the making against the taking WITH NOTHING IN IT. What does the same balance give where a body's own carriers are also being met?", "about": "\\rho at R", "concluded": "\\rho at R = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{\\frac{-2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\rho} + 1 - \\rho} - \\paren{\\rho + \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\rho}}^{2} = 0", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the density where a body is, which is not the density of empty space", "line": "\\rho at R = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho - \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}} - 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{\\rho + \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}}^{2} = 0", "working": ["the body's carriers where the far one stands: n = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "the population where the body stands: \\rho + n", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho - \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\paren{\\rho + \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}}^{2} = 0", "\\rho at R = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho - \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}} - 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{\\rho + \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}}^{2} = 0"], "because": "the empty-space density is the root of the making against the taking, and it was derived under a condition it is then used outside of: it holds where the line is about the vacuum and NOT about a source. Near a body there is a source. The meeting rule never asks which body a ray belongs to, so the body's own carriers are taken against as readily as the vacuum's and the balance gains a cross piece - AND IT IS THE SAME BALANCE otherwise, read off the same terms with the same counts, so a change in what a rule does moves both together. Far out the body's carriers are nothing and it returns the empty-space root exactly"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": []}, "gravity.arrivals": {"theorem": "gravity.arrivals", "theory": "G", "asks": "what does a body actually have DELIVERED to it - rays absorbed and meetings had?", "about": "g_{N} in bodies and transport", "concluded": "g_{N} \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}"], "because": "the near body prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. NEITHER BODY HAS TO EMIT ANYTHING for this one - it is the making that did not happen, carried out to R and met by whatever is open to it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "\\bar{r} = m.distance\\paren{m'}", "working": ["\\bar{r} = m.distance\\paren{m'}"], "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "T_{vac} = \\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "over the two bodies, \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}, and over the shell they share:", "T_{vac} = the channel over its bodies over \\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}} = \\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic: one body's radiation meeting the other's. It needs BOTH to be shining, which is why it carries both masses and the motion factor twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "T_{met} = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "working": ["the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "over the same two bodies and the same shell:", "T_{met} = the channel over its bodies over \\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}} = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}"], "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "g_{N} \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}", "working": ["\\bar{m} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "\\bar{m}' = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "g_{N} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}"], "because": "the same arrival, told apart. TWO BODIES AND THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THEM STAND IN FRONT, and at three dimensions that front is `m m'/\\bar{r}^{2}` - Newton's, arrived at rather than assumed. What is left is a bracket of two transports, and the model is entirely in the bracket. THE TWO ARE NOT THE SAME KIND OF COUPLING: `T_{vac}` carries the near body's shortfall per unit of its mass, which SATURATES because a body deeper than a mean free path shadows itself, and `T_{met}` does not. That difference is the whole of what separates a body felt as its face from one felt as its bulk"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "is": "T_{met}", "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}]}, "gravity.full": {"theorem": "gravity.full", "theory": "G", "asks": "put the pieces together. What is the gravitational force between two bodies R apart, with every factor written in?", "about": "F_{g} as one equation in full", "concluded": "F_{g} as one equation in full = \\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}", "beneath": [], "also": "F_{g} in full = \\frac{2·a_{0}}{\\sqrt{\\frac{4·a_{0}}{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}} + 1} - 1}", "leads": "\"RECURSIVE — g stands on both sides, because the mismatch is measured against \" + \"the acceleration it produces. This is the form the rules give and it is exact.\"", "then": "\"NOT RECURSIVE — the same law solved for g, with nothing on the right that is \" + \"not already known. Every name in it is written once. It loses precision where the field \" + \"is strong, so it is what a reader gets and never what a number is evaluated from.\"", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel - what the near body prevents, CARRIED as the \\delta that spreads rather than multiplied onto it afterwards, over what the far one is open to:", "  S = 0,  thinned \\frac{\\delta·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega},  open to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "  = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "the meetings' channel - the two bodies' own radiation, meeting:", "  = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "and the expansion is not a third - it is the same shortfall where nothing is in the way", "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "F_{g} = \\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = g_{N}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}", "working": ["the mismatch, measured against the vacuum's own rate: a_{0}/g", "g = g_{N}\\paren{1 + \\frac{a_{0}}{g}}", "and solved: \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "what is felt is what arrives, enhanced by the mismatch that accumulated over one mean free path - and that mismatch is measured against the only rate the vacuum has, which is a_{0}/g. So g = g_{N}(1 + a_{0}/g), with the arrival written ONCE. Solving it is a quadratic and the answer is the line below; this is the line the rules give, and it is the one a reader can hold"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "with every factor written in", "line": "F_{g} as one equation in full = \\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}", "working": ["F_{g} as one equation = \\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = g_{N}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}", "g_{N} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}", "\\sigma = 1", "\\bar{c} = 1", "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "F_{g} as one equation = \\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}"], "because": "what is read straight off a rewrite is written in, because a reader could not have known it; what has a theorem of its own KEEPS ITS NAME and is cited, because writing it in would replace a proof with its answer. What is left standing is the rules' own rates, the counts of the tiling, the two bodies, and the handful of quantities that have pages of their own"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": []}, "space.recession": {"theorem": "space.recession", "theory": "G", "asks": "the vacuum makes space wherever it is idle. What does that do to two things sitting some distance apart?", "about": "recession", "concluded": "recession = \\paren{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\frac{\\rho^{2}}{2}}·\\bar{r}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the space line nets = \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the space line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into space -1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into space 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into space 1", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into space 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into space 0", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into space 1", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into space 1", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into space 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the space ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "space is made between them, and there is more of it the further apart they are", "line": "recession = \\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}·\\bar{r}", "working": ["\\partial_{t}s = \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, every term of the space line", "points between two bodies R apart: R of them", "recession = \\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}·\\bar{r}"], "because": "the space line says every neutral point makes space at the net of what the splitting makes and the meetings take. Between two bodies there are as many such points as there is distance, so the room between them grows at that rate times that distance - nothing is pushing them and they are carried apart anyway, faster the further apart they already are"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\bar{n}", "is": "0", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. how much of a way carries some body's ray, on the world's mean - a fact about what the world holds, not about its rules, so it is put in; in the settled vacuum, with no body in it, it is nought"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "\\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho", "is": "what the waiting makes", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. MOVEMENT hands the ray to itself and grows the world - no ray made, destroyed or moved, and a point of space where there was none. That is a carrier standing still to make the room it could not step into, and the rate it does so at is \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho"}, {"part": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2}", "is": "the world's matter grows", "because": "two bodies' rays meet as any two rays do - at the rate, facing, each end carrying - and each such meeting grows what the rule read on bodies' rays says: per point per tick, that is how much the world grows"}, {"part": "2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}", "is": "\\varepsilon", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what the empty vacuum grows on its own, per point per tick: a vacuum ray meeting with the way behind it not lit in the same event. Not yet derived from the rules - put in, at the rate the meetings were read to grow at before"}]}, "gravity.expansion": {"theorem": "gravity.expansion", "theory": "G", "asks": "a body makes less space where it sits. What does that do to how fast two of them are carried apart - and is THAT the attraction?", "about": "the deficit in recession", "concluded": "the deficit in recession = \\frac{-2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\frac{\\rho}{2}}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}}{\\rho·\\paren{2 - D}}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the space line nets = \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the space line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into space -1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into space 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into space 1", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into space 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into space 0", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into space 1", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into space 1", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into space 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the space ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "space is made between them, and there is more of it the further apart they are", "line": "recession = \\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}·\\bar{r}", "working": ["\\partial_{t}s = \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, every term of the space line", "points between two bodies R apart: R of them", "recession = \\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}·\\bar{r}"], "because": "the space line says every neutral point makes space at the net of what the splitting makes and the meetings take. Between two bodies there are as many such points as there is distance, so the room between them grows at that rate times that distance - nothing is pushing them and they are carried apart anyway, faster the further apart they already are"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "and a body makes less of it, so they are carried apart more slowly", "line": "the deficit in recession = -\\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho·\\paren{2 - D}}", "working": ["recession = \\paren{\\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega}·\\rho + 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{n}^{2} + 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2} - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}·\\bar{r}", "the shortfall at each point is the body's own, carried: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho·\\omega}", "far out that comes to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "\\int of that dr = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·r^{2 - D}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho·\\paren{2 - D}}", "the deficit in recession = -\\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho·\\paren{2 - D}}"], "because": "the room between two bodies grows at the making rate times how many points there are, and a body has reduced that rate at every one of them. Summed along the line - integrated by the algebra over whatever profile the transport gave, not over a power assumed in advance - that is the deficit in how fast they are carried apart, and it is what an attraction IS in a model whose gravity is an expansion that did not happen"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "is": "l.\\bar{m}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"part": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "is": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}, {"part": "2", "is": "what bodies' rays grow where they meet", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. ANNIHILATION read on two bodies' rays: each still leaves the point behind it where the way behind is dark, and behind a body's ray - lit by a source, not by CREATE, and met in the vacuum's dark half - nothing stands, so both gates are open"}]}, "gravity.sign": {"theorem": "gravity.sign", "theory": "G", "asks": "two channels could in principle oppose. Can anything a body does make this law push rather than pull - a second body moving away, for instance?", "about": "the sign of the force", "concluded": "the sign of the force = 1", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel - what the near body prevents, CARRIED as the \\delta that spreads rather than multiplied onto it afterwards, over what the far one is open to:", "  S = 0,  thinned \\frac{\\delta·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega},  open to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "  = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "the meetings' channel - the two bodies' own radiation, meeting:", "  = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "and the expansion is not a third - it is the same shortfall where nothing is in the way", "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}", "working": ["CREATION: fires at a free point, lights every exit -> the vacuum pulses, period two", "propel + EMISSION: a source moves or pulses, never both -> the second pulse", "an emission r cells out arrives r ticks later, so meeting the vacuum's rays is a parity", "each move flips it, opposite ways fore and aft", "constant speed: the flips cancel.  accelerating: they accumulate, at g", "a flip counts only while the carrier lasts, which is one mean free path", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma\\omega\\rho), and the time to cross it is \\lambda/v", "an accelerating source displaces \\frac{1}{2}g\\lambda^{2} over it - that many flips", "g\\lambda is the only dimensionless combination; g\\lambda diverges, 1/(g\\lambda) turns over", "g = g_{N}(1 + 1/(g\\lambda)),  and a_{0} = 1/\\lambda", "g^{2} - g_{N}g - g_{N}a_{0} = 0", "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "CREATION fires only where nothing is going on and lights every exit, so a point fires, fills, drains and fires - the vacuum pulses every other tick. And a source moves or pulses and never both, which is what puts (1-\\beta) on the line. So there are two pulses and moving shifts the phase between them: an emission reaches a place r cells away after r ticks, and whether it arrives while the vacuum there is lit - and is doused by the meeting rule - is a parity. Each move flips it, and moving toward a place shortens the path where moving away lengthens it, so the flip goes opposite ways fore and aft. AT A CONSTANT SPEED THOSE CANCEL; under an acceleration they accumulate, because the rate of flipping keeps changing - and what a body accelerates at is g itself. That is what puts g on the right-hand side. Measured against the only rate the vacuum has it is a_{0}/g, and solving is the one place here where anything is solved rather than assembled: strong field gives back g_{N} exactly, weak field the GEOMETRIC MEAN of what arrives and the rate space is made - so g carries the ROOT of the mass g_{N} carries whole"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "with every factor written in", "line": "F_{g} in full = \\frac{2·a_{0}}{\\sqrt{\\frac{4·a_{0}}{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}} + 1} - 1}", "working": ["F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}", "g_{N} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}", "\\sigma = 1", "\\bar{c} = 1", "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "F_{g} = \\frac{2·a_{0}}{\\sqrt{\\frac{4·a_{0}}{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}} + 1} - 1}"], "because": "what is read straight off a rewrite is written in, because a reader could not have known it; what has a theorem of its own KEEPS ITS NAME and is cited, because writing it in would replace a proof with its answer. What is left standing is the rules' own rates, the counts of the tiling, the two bodies, and the handful of quantities that have pages of their own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one action a tick does to a moving body", "line": "how motion moves it = \\paren{1 - \\beta}^{2}", "working": ["what a body puts out: l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "the meetings channel needs both: (1-\\beta)^{2}", "the vacuum's channel needs neither: 1"], "because": "the meetings channel is one body's radiation meeting the other's, so it needs both to be shining and carries the share twice. The vacuum's channel needs neither to emit anything - an inert body suppresses the expansion just by sitting there - so it carries none of it. Gravity between things in motion is therefore weaker, and weaker in ONE of its two channels, which is a thing that could be looked for"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "whether any of it can turn negative", "line": "the sign of the force = 1", "working": ["motion contributes \\paren{1 - \\beta}^{2}", "\\beta is a share of ticks, so 0 <= \\beta <= 1", "(1-\\beta)^{2} >= 0, with no direction in it", "and every other factor is a rate, a count or an exponential", "so F_{g} > 0 always - it weakens with motion and never reverses"], "because": "every factor of the assembled law is a rate, a count, a square, or an exponential, and none of those is ever below nothing. In particular the one thing motion contributes is a SHARE OF TICKS - how often a body spent its action crossing a cell rather than shining - which lies between nothing and all, so `(1-\\beta)` is never negative and its square is never negative. THE RULE THAT PRODUCES IT ASKS WHETHER A BODY STEPPED, AND A STEP IS A STEP WHICHEVER WAY IT WENT: nothing in it distinguishes toward from away. So the force is attractive always, and a body moving off is pulled LESS rather than pushed - which is a thing that could be looked for, and a thing this theory would be wrong about if a repulsion were ever seen"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "rotation.curve": {"theorem": "rotation.curve", "theory": "G", "asks": "a body goes round at a radius. What speed does the circle need - and what decides whether that speed falls off or does not?", "about": "v^{2} as one equation in full", "concluded": "v^{2} as one equation in full = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}", "beneath": [], "also": "v^{2} in full = \\frac{2·\\bar{r}·a_{0}}{\\sqrt{\\frac{4·a_{0}}{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}} + 1} - 1}", "leads": "\"RECURSIVE — g stands on both sides, because the mismatch is measured against \" + \"the acceleration it produces. This is the form the rules give and it is exact.\"", "then": "\"NOT RECURSIVE — the same law solved for g, with nothing on the right that is \" + \"not already known. Every name in it is written once. It loses precision where the field \" + \"is strong, so it is what a reader gets and never what a number is evaluated from.\"", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel - what the near body prevents, CARRIED as the \\delta that spreads rather than multiplied onto it afterwards, over what the far one is open to:", "  S = 0,  thinned \\frac{\\delta·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega},  open to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "  = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "the meetings' channel - the two bodies' own radiation, meeting:", "  = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "and the expansion is not a third - it is the same shortfall where nothing is in the way", "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "F_{g} = \\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = g_{N}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}", "working": ["the mismatch, measured against the vacuum's own rate: a_{0}/g", "g = g_{N}\\paren{1 + \\frac{a_{0}}{g}}", "and solved: \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "what is felt is what arrives, enhanced by the mismatch that accumulated over one mean free path - and that mismatch is measured against the only rate the vacuum has, which is a_{0}/g. So g = g_{N}(1 + a_{0}/g), with the arrival written ONCE. Solving it is a quadratic and the answer is the line below; this is the line the rules give, and it is the one a reader can hold"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a circle needs to stay on", "line": "v^{2} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = g_{N}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}", "working": ["v^{2}/R = g", "v^{2} = R·\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = g_{N}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}"], "because": "the same circle read against the equation the rules give rather than against its solution - so the arrival appears once here and twice there, and the two say the same thing"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "with every factor written in", "line": "v^{2} as one equation in full = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}", "working": ["v^{2} as one equation = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = g_{N}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}", "g_{N} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}", "\\sigma = 1", "\\bar{c} = 1", "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "v^{2} as one equation = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}"], "because": "what is read straight off a rewrite is written in, because a reader could not have known it; what has a theorem of its own KEEPS ITS NAME and is cited, because writing it in would replace a proof with its answer. What is left standing is the rules' own rates, the counts of the tiling, the two bodies, and the handful of quantities that have pages of their own"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": []}, "galaxy.point": {"theorem": "galaxy.point", "theory": "G", "asks": "a galaxy taken as ONE source, the whole of its mass presenting one face. What does it send, and what curve does that give?", "about": "v^{2} with the mass gathered as one equation in bodies and transport", "concluded": "v^{2} with the mass gathered as one equation \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}_{\\bullet}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}", "beneath": [], "also": "v^{2} with the mass gathered \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{m}_{\\bullet}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{\\paren{\\bar{m}_{\\bullet}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}}^{2}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}^{2}}{4} + \\bar{m}_{\\bullet}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·a_{0}}}", "leads": "\"RECURSIVE — g stands on both sides, because the mismatch is measured against \" + \"the acceleration it produces. This is the form the rules give and it is exact.\"", "then": "\"NOT RECURSIVE — the same law solved for g, with nothing on the right that is \" + \"not already known. Every name in it is written once. It loses precision where the field \" + \"is strong, so it is what a reader gets and never what a number is evaluated from.\"", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel - what the near body prevents, CARRIED as the \\delta that spreads rather than multiplied onto it afterwards, over what the far one is open to:", "  S = 0,  thinned \\frac{\\delta·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega},  open to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "  = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "the meetings' channel - the two bodies' own radiation, meeting:", "  = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "and the expansion is not a third - it is the same shortfall where nothing is in the way", "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}", "working": ["CREATION: fires at a free point, lights every exit -> the vacuum pulses, period two", "propel + EMISSION: a source moves or pulses, never both -> the second pulse", "an emission r cells out arrives r ticks later, so meeting the vacuum's rays is a parity", "each move flips it, opposite ways fore and aft", "constant speed: the flips cancel.  accelerating: they accumulate, at g", "a flip counts only while the carrier lasts, which is one mean free path", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma\\omega\\rho), and the time to cross it is \\lambda/v", "an accelerating source displaces \\frac{1}{2}g\\lambda^{2} over it - that many flips", "g\\lambda is the only dimensionless combination; g\\lambda diverges, 1/(g\\lambda) turns over", "g = g_{N}(1 + 1/(g\\lambda)),  and a_{0} = 1/\\lambda", "g^{2} - g_{N}g - g_{N}a_{0} = 0", "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "CREATION fires only where nothing is going on and lights every exit, so a point fires, fills, drains and fires - the vacuum pulses every other tick. And a source moves or pulses and never both, which is what puts (1-\\beta) on the line. So there are two pulses and moving shifts the phase between them: an emission reaches a place r cells away after r ticks, and whether it arrives while the vacuum there is lit - and is doused by the meeting rule - is a parity. Each move flips it, and moving toward a place shortens the path where moving away lengthens it, so the flip goes opposite ways fore and aft. AT A CONSTANT SPEED THOSE CANCEL; under an acceleration they accumulate, because the rate of flipping keeps changing - and what a body accelerates at is g itself. That is what puts g on the right-hand side. Measured against the only rate the vacuum has it is a_{0}/g, and solving is the one place here where anything is solved rather than assembled: strong field gives back g_{N} exactly, weak field the GEOMETRIC MEAN of what arrives and the rate space is made - so g carries the ROOT of the mass g_{N} carries whole"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a circle needs to stay on", "line": "v^{2} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}}", "working": ["v^{2}/R = g", "v^{2} = R·\\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "a circular orbit is an acceleration of v^{2}/R toward the centre and the medium is what supplies it, so the speed a circle needs is the square root of the radius times what is felt there. Nothing about galaxies is in this - it is what any orbit is, and the galaxy comes in through what `g` is at that radius"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the same mass, gathered or scattered", "line": "what a gathered mass sends = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["\\paren{1-\\sigma\\rho}^{m/A} -> 0 as m/A grows", "what is sent -> \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and that does not mention m at all - the inside is hidden"], "because": "all of it in one place is many mean free paths deep behind its own face, so what gets out through that face is all of it - the factor saturates and what is sent is set by the FACE. Mass added behind it is shadowed by its own skin and sends nothing"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the curve each arrangement has", "line": "v^{2} with the mass gathered as one equation \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}_{\\bullet}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}", "working": ["v^{2} = R·g, and g = (that arrival)·(1 + a_{0}/g)"], "because": "the circle read at that arrival, against the equation the rules give rather than against its solution - so the arrival is written once"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": []}, "galaxy.many": {"theorem": "galaxy.many", "theory": "G", "asks": "and the same galaxy taken as its stars, each thin enough to send all of itself. Why is that not the same answer?", "about": "v^{2} with the mass scattered as one equation in bodies and transport", "concluded": "v^{2} with the mass scattered as one equation \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}_{\\star}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}", "beneath": [], "also": "v^{2} with the mass scattered \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{m}_{\\star}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{\\paren{\\bar{m}_{\\star}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}}^{2}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}^{2}}{4} + \\bar{m}_{\\star}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·a_{0}}}", "leads": "\"RECURSIVE — g stands on both sides, because the mismatch is measured against \" + \"the acceleration it produces. This is the form the rules give and it is exact.\"", "then": "\"NOT RECURSIVE — the same law solved for g, with nothing on the right that is \" + \"not already known. Every name in it is written once. It loses precision where the field \" + \"is strong, so it is what a reader gets and never what a number is evaluated from.\"", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel - what the near body prevents, CARRIED as the \\delta that spreads rather than multiplied onto it afterwards, over what the far one is open to:", "  S = 0,  thinned \\frac{\\delta·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega},  open to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "  = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "the meetings' channel - the two bodies' own radiation, meeting:", "  = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "and the expansion is not a third - it is the same shortfall where nothing is in the way", "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}", "working": ["CREATION: fires at a free point, lights every exit -> the vacuum pulses, period two", "propel + EMISSION: a source moves or pulses, never both -> the second pulse", "an emission r cells out arrives r ticks later, so meeting the vacuum's rays is a parity", "each move flips it, opposite ways fore and aft", "constant speed: the flips cancel.  accelerating: they accumulate, at g", "a flip counts only while the carrier lasts, which is one mean free path", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma\\omega\\rho), and the time to cross it is \\lambda/v", "an accelerating source displaces \\frac{1}{2}g\\lambda^{2} over it - that many flips", "g\\lambda is the only dimensionless combination; g\\lambda diverges, 1/(g\\lambda) turns over", "g = g_{N}(1 + 1/(g\\lambda)),  and a_{0} = 1/\\lambda", "g^{2} - g_{N}g - g_{N}a_{0} = 0", "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "CREATION fires only where nothing is going on and lights every exit, so a point fires, fills, drains and fires - the vacuum pulses every other tick. And a source moves or pulses and never both, which is what puts (1-\\beta) on the line. So there are two pulses and moving shifts the phase between them: an emission reaches a place r cells away after r ticks, and whether it arrives while the vacuum there is lit - and is doused by the meeting rule - is a parity. Each move flips it, and moving toward a place shortens the path where moving away lengthens it, so the flip goes opposite ways fore and aft. AT A CONSTANT SPEED THOSE CANCEL; under an acceleration they accumulate, because the rate of flipping keeps changing - and what a body accelerates at is g itself. That is what puts g on the right-hand side. Measured against the only rate the vacuum has it is a_{0}/g, and solving is the one place here where anything is solved rather than assembled: strong field gives back g_{N} exactly, weak field the GEOMETRIC MEAN of what arrives and the rate space is made - so g carries the ROOT of the mass g_{N} carries whole"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a circle needs to stay on", "line": "v^{2} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}}", "working": ["v^{2}/R = g", "v^{2} = R·\\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "a circular orbit is an acceleration of v^{2}/R toward the centre and the medium is what supplies it, so the speed a circle needs is the square root of the radius times what is felt there. Nothing about galaxies is in this - it is what any orbit is, and the galaxy comes in through what `g` is at that radius"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the same mass, gathered or scattered", "line": "what a scattered mass sends = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["1 - \\paren{1-\\sigma\\rho}^{x} = -x\\log\\paren{1-\\sigma\\rho} + O\\paren{x^{2}}", "one star: A_{*}\\cdot\\frac{m_{*}}{A_{*}}\\cdot-\\log\\paren{1-\\sigma\\rho} = m_{*}\\cdot-\\log\\paren{1-\\sigma\\rho}", "M/m_{*} of them: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "cut into stars, each is thin: 1 - \\paren{1-\\sigma\\rho}^{x} is -x\\log\\paren{1-\\sigma\\rho} for small x, so a star sends its own MASS by that log and its face cancels. Arrivals add, so M/m_{*} of them send M by the same log - LINEAR IN THE TOTAL, with the star's mass and face both gone from the answer. How finely it is cut does not change it, which is the only way a sum over bodies can mean anything"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the curve each arrangement has", "line": "v^{2} with the mass scattered as one equation \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\text{the } g \\text{ where } g = \\bar{m}_{\\star}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{g} + 1}}", "working": ["v^{2} = R·g, and g = (that arrival)·(1 + a_{0}/g)"], "because": "the circle read at that arrival, against the equation the rules give rather than against its solution - so the arrival is written once"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": []}, "rotation.keplerian": {"theorem": "rotation.keplerian", "theory": "G", "asks": "where what arrives is far above the scale, what does the curve do?", "about": "v^{2} where the arrival dominates in full", "concluded": "v^{2} where the arrival dominates in full = \\bar{r}·\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel - what the near body prevents, CARRIED as the \\delta that spreads rather than multiplied onto it afterwards, over what the far one is open to:", "  S = 0,  thinned \\frac{\\delta·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega},  open to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "  = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "the meetings' channel - the two bodies' own radiation, meeting:", "  = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "and the expansion is not a third - it is the same shortfall where nothing is in the way", "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}", "working": ["CREATION: fires at a free point, lights every exit -> the vacuum pulses, period two", "propel + EMISSION: a source moves or pulses, never both -> the second pulse", "an emission r cells out arrives r ticks later, so meeting the vacuum's rays is a parity", "each move flips it, opposite ways fore and aft", "constant speed: the flips cancel.  accelerating: they accumulate, at g", "a flip counts only while the carrier lasts, which is one mean free path", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma\\omega\\rho), and the time to cross it is \\lambda/v", "an accelerating source displaces \\frac{1}{2}g\\lambda^{2} over it - that many flips", "g\\lambda is the only dimensionless combination; g\\lambda diverges, 1/(g\\lambda) turns over", "g = g_{N}(1 + 1/(g\\lambda)),  and a_{0} = 1/\\lambda", "g^{2} - g_{N}g - g_{N}a_{0} = 0", "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "CREATION fires only where nothing is going on and lights every exit, so a point fires, fills, drains and fires - the vacuum pulses every other tick. And a source moves or pulses and never both, which is what puts (1-\\beta) on the line. So there are two pulses and moving shifts the phase between them: an emission reaches a place r cells away after r ticks, and whether it arrives while the vacuum there is lit - and is doused by the meeting rule - is a parity. Each move flips it, and moving toward a place shortens the path where moving away lengthens it, so the flip goes opposite ways fore and aft. AT A CONSTANT SPEED THOSE CANCEL; under an acceleration they accumulate, because the rate of flipping keeps changing - and what a body accelerates at is g itself. That is what puts g on the right-hand side. Measured against the only rate the vacuum has it is a_{0}/g, and solving is the one place here where anything is solved rather than assembled: strong field gives back g_{N} exactly, weak field the GEOMETRIC MEAN of what arrives and the rate space is made - so g carries the ROOT of the mass g_{N} carries whole"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a circle needs to stay on", "line": "v^{2} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}}", "working": ["v^{2}/R = g", "v^{2} = R·\\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "a circular orbit is an acceleration of v^{2}/R toward the centre and the medium is what supplies it, so the speed a circle needs is the square root of the radius times what is felt there. Nothing about galaxies is in this - it is what any orbit is, and the galaxy comes in through what `g` is at that radius"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the two ends a rotation curve has", "line": "v^{2} where the arrival dominates = \\bar{r}·g_{N}", "working": ["g -> g_{N}", "v^{2} = \\bar{r}·g_{N}", "and g_{N} goes as R^{-(D-1)}, so v^{2} goes as R^{2-D} - inverse R at D = 3"], "because": "where what arrives is far above the scale the law gives back the arrival itself, so the curve is R times it. What arrives is diluted over the room a shell has, which in three dimensions is an inverse square, so this falls as one over the radius and the speed as its root - Kepler, with nothing added"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "with every factor written in", "line": "v^{2} where the arrival dominates in full = \\bar{r}·\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}", "working": ["v^{2} where the arrival dominates = \\bar{r}·g_{N}", "g_{N} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}", "\\sigma = 1", "\\bar{c} = 1", "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "v^{2} where the arrival dominates = \\bar{r}·\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}"], "because": "what is read straight off a rewrite is written in, because a reader could not have known it; what has a theorem of its own KEEPS ITS NAME and is cited, because writing it in would replace a proof with its answer. What is left standing is the rules' own rates, the counts of the tiling, the two bodies, and the handful of quantities that have pages of their own"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "2", "is": "what bodies' rays grow where they meet", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. ANNIHILATION read on two bodies' rays: each still leaves the point behind it where the way behind is dark, and behind a body's ray - lit by a source, not by CREATE, and met in the vacuum's dark half - nothing stands, so both gates are open"}]}, "rotation.flat": {"theorem": "rotation.flat", "theory": "G", "asks": "and where the scale is far above what arrives - why does the radius drop out?", "about": "v^{2} where the scale dominates in full", "concluded": "v^{2} where the scale dominates in full = \\bar{r}·\\sqrt{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·a_{0}}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel - what the near body prevents, CARRIED as the \\delta that spreads rather than multiplied onto it afterwards, over what the far one is open to:", "  S = 0,  thinned \\frac{\\delta·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega},  open to \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "  = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "the meetings' channel - the two bodies' own radiation, meeting:", "  = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "and the expansion is not a third - it is the same shortfall where nothing is in the way", "g_{N} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}} + \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "TWO CHANNELS, and they are not the same thing counted over. The vacuum's needs neither body to emit anything: the near one prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. The meetings' needs both: it is the cross piece of the quadratic, one body's radiation meeting the other's, and it carries both masses. What a body feels is everything that arrives at it, and things that arrive add. AND THE EXPANSION IS NOT A THIRD: a body prevents the splitting around it, and that one missing making is read as room that never appeared where there is nothing in the way, and as something arriving where there is. Asking what force a body feels puts a body in the way, so it is the second reading - counting both would count one shortfall twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}", "working": ["CREATION: fires at a free point, lights every exit -> the vacuum pulses, period two", "propel + EMISSION: a source moves or pulses, never both -> the second pulse", "an emission r cells out arrives r ticks later, so meeting the vacuum's rays is a parity", "each move flips it, opposite ways fore and aft", "constant speed: the flips cancel.  accelerating: they accumulate, at g", "a flip counts only while the carrier lasts, which is one mean free path", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma\\omega\\rho), and the time to cross it is \\lambda/v", "an accelerating source displaces \\frac{1}{2}g\\lambda^{2} over it - that many flips", "g\\lambda is the only dimensionless combination; g\\lambda diverges, 1/(g\\lambda) turns over", "g = g_{N}(1 + 1/(g\\lambda)),  and a_{0} = 1/\\lambda", "g^{2} - g_{N}g - g_{N}a_{0} = 0", "F_{g} = \\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "CREATION fires only where nothing is going on and lights every exit, so a point fires, fills, drains and fires - the vacuum pulses every other tick. And a source moves or pulses and never both, which is what puts (1-\\beta) on the line. So there are two pulses and moving shifts the phase between them: an emission reaches a place r cells away after r ticks, and whether it arrives while the vacuum there is lit - and is doused by the meeting rule - is a parity. Each move flips it, and moving toward a place shortens the path where moving away lengthens it, so the flip goes opposite ways fore and aft. AT A CONSTANT SPEED THOSE CANCEL; under an acceleration they accumulate, because the rate of flipping keeps changing - and what a body accelerates at is g itself. That is what puts g on the right-hand side. Measured against the only rate the vacuum has it is a_{0}/g, and solving is the one place here where anything is solved rather than assembled: strong field gives back g_{N} exactly, weak field the GEOMETRIC MEAN of what arrives and the rate space is made - so g carries the ROOT of the mass g_{N} carries whole"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a circle needs to stay on", "line": "v^{2} = \\bar{r}·\\paren{\\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}}", "working": ["v^{2}/R = g", "v^{2} = R·\\frac{g_{N}}{2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{g_{N}^{2}}{4} + g_{N}·a_{0}}"], "because": "a circular orbit is an acceleration of v^{2}/R toward the centre and the medium is what supplies it, so the speed a circle needs is the square root of the radius times what is felt there. Nothing about galaxies is in this - it is what any orbit is, and the galaxy comes in through what `g` is at that radius"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\varepsilon = 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\varepsilon, which stands on every term of it alike", "\\varepsilon = 2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}, a placeholder until derived"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what the empty vacuum grows on its own, per point per tick: a vacuum ray meeting with the way behind it not lit in the same event. Not yet derived from the rules - put in, at the rate the meetings were read to grow at before"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rate the empty vacuum expands at", "line": "H_{\\Lambda} = \\frac{2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{D}", "working": ["H_{\\Lambda} = \\varepsilon/D"], "because": "of what the world grows by, the part the empty vacuum grows on its own: it does not thin as the matter does, so it is the same rate at every epoch - a cosmological constant, and the one rate a scale can be set by"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the phase between the two pulses, which the body's own acceleration keeps from cancelling", "line": "a_{0} = \\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "working": ["the scale is set by what does not change: the empty vacuum's own growth", "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "H_{\\Lambda} = \\frac{2·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{D}", "a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda} = \\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}"], "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the two ends a rotation curve has", "line": "v^{2} where the scale dominates = \\bar{r}·\\sqrt{g_{N}·a_{0}}", "working": ["g -> \\sqrt{g_{N}a_{0}}", "v^{2} = \\bar{r}·\\sqrt{g_{N}·a_{0}}", "g_{N} \\propto R^{-(D-1)}, so \\sqrt{g_{N}} \\propto R^{-(D-1)/2}", "v^{2} \\propto R^{1-(D-1)/2} = R^{0} at D = 3 - flat, and only at D = 3"], "because": "and where the scale is far above what arrives the law gives their geometric mean. THE POWERS OF THE RADIUS THEN CANCEL EXACTLY: what arrives falls as an inverse square, its root falls as one over the radius, and the R in front of it undoes that - so the speed does not depend on the radius at all. A FLAT CURVE IS NOT PUT IN ANYWHERE; it is one power of R against the root of two"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "with every factor written in", "line": "v^{2} where the scale dominates in full = \\bar{r}·\\sqrt{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·a_{0}}", "working": ["v^{2} where the scale dominates = \\bar{r}·\\sqrt{g_{N}·a_{0}}", "g_{N} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}", "\\sigma = 1", "\\bar{c} = 1", "F = \\frac{1}{2}", "v^{2} where the scale dominates = \\bar{r}·\\sqrt{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·a_{0}}"], "because": "what is read straight off a rewrite is written in, because a reader could not have known it; what has a theorem of its own KEEPS ITS NAME and is cited, because writing it in would replace a proof with its answer. What is left standing is the rules' own rates, the counts of the tiling, the two bodies, and the handful of quantities that have pages of their own"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": []}, "gravity.newton": {"theorem": "gravity.newton", "theory": "G", "asks": "the law is written with the dimension as a symbol. Put three in - what is the force between two bodies in the world we live in?", "about": "F_{g} at D = 3 as one equation", "concluded": "F_{g} \\aside{at} D \\aside{= 3} = \\frac{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'}{\\bar{r}^{2}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{\\frac{4·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}}}{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "beneath": [], "also": "F_{g} \\aside{at} D \\aside{= 3} = \\frac{2·a_{0}}{\\sqrt{\\frac{4·a_{0}}{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{\\frac{4·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}}}{\\bar{r}} + 1}}} + 1} - 1}", "leads": "TWO MASSES OVER THE SQUARE OF WHAT SEPARATES THEM, which is Newton's, and is not put in anywhere - the front is a count of the places three-dimensional space has at a distance. Everything the model says is in the bracket: two transports, one for each route between the bodies, and the recursion, which is the mismatch measured against the acceleration it produces. This is the form the rules give and it is exact.", "then": "\"NOT RECURSIVE — the same law solved for g, with nothing on the right that is \" + \"not already known. Every name in it is written once. It loses precision where the field \" + \"is strong, so it is what a reader gets and never what a number is evaluated from.\"", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}"], "because": "the near body prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. NEITHER BODY HAS TO EMIT ANYTHING for this one - it is the making that did not happen, carried out to R and met by whatever is open to it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "\\bar{r} = m.distance\\paren{m'}", "working": ["\\bar{r} = m.distance\\paren{m'}"], "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "T_{vac} = \\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "over the two bodies, \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}, and over the shell they share:", "T_{vac} = the channel over its bodies over \\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}} = \\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic: one body's radiation meeting the other's. It needs BOTH to be shining, which is why it carries both masses and the motion factor twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "T_{met} = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "working": ["the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "over the same two bodies and the same shell:", "T_{met} = the channel over its bodies over \\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}} = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}"], "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "g_{N} \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}", "working": ["\\bar{m} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "\\bar{m}' = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "g_{N} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}"], "because": "the same arrival, told apart. TWO BODIES AND THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THEM STAND IN FRONT, and at three dimensions that front is `m m'/\\bar{r}^{2}` - Newton's, arrived at rather than assumed. What is left is a bracket of two transports, and the model is entirely in the bracket. THE TWO ARE NOT THE SAME KIND OF COUPLING: `T_{vac}` carries the near body's shortfall per unit of its mass, which SATURATES because a body deeper than a mean free path shadows itself, and `T_{met}` does not. That difference is the whole of what separates a body felt as its face from one felt as its bulk"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "g_{N} at D = 3 \\aside{in bodies and transport} = \\frac{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'}{\\bar{r}^{2}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{\\frac{2·\\sigma·F}{\\bar{c}} + \\frac{4·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}{\\bar{r}}}}", "working": ["g_{N} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}", "D = 3"], "because": "the arrival between two bodies in three dimensions: their two masses over the square of what separates them, times what the medium carries between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "F_{g} \\aside{at} D \\aside{= 3} = \\frac{\\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'}{\\bar{r}^{2}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{\\frac{2·\\sigma·F}{\\bar{c}} + \\frac{4·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}{\\bar{r}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "working": ["F_{g} = \\bar{m}·\\bar{m}'·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "D = 3"], "because": "and what is felt: Newton's two masses over the square of the separation, times a bracket of two transports, times the mismatch measured against the acceleration it produces. EVERY PART OF THE MODEL IS IN THE BRACKET - the front is a count of the places three-dimensional space has at a distance, and nothing was fitted to make it an inverse square"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "\\frac{2·\\sigma·F}{\\bar{c}} + \\frac{4·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}{\\bar{r}}", "is": "T_{met} at D = 3", "because": "the exchange transport in three dimensions"}]}, "lattice.counting": {"theorem": "lattice.counting", "theory": "G", "asks": "a body has a size, so the same counting that says how far away something is has to say how big it is. What are the two counts?", "about": "l.ball\\paren{\\bar{R}}.count", "concluded": "l.ball\\paren{\\bar{R}}.count = \\bar{R}^{D}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the ball and the shell it is bounded by", "line": "l.ball\\paren{\\bar{R}}.count = \\bar{R}^{D}", "working": ["l.ball\\paren{\\bar{R}}.count = \\sum_{r}^{\\bar{R}} l.shell = \\bar{R}^{D}"], "because": "the places WITHIN R steps, which is the shell summed over every radius up to R - one power higher, by the same count of walks"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "gravity.mass": {"theorem": "gravity.mass", "theory": "G", "asks": "a source says how often it announces itself and how big it is, and nothing else. What is it worth, per unit of the face it announces through, to everything around it?", "about": "\\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "concluded": "\\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\rho·l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the ball and the shell it is bounded by", "line": "l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\bar{R}^{D - 1}", "working": ["l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\bar{R}^{D - 1}", "l.shell(1) = DEG = DEG"], "because": "the places at exactly R steps out, which `ehrhart` counts off the ways out of a point - and at R = 1 it is the ways out themselves, so DEG is this same count read at one rather than a number of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the ball and the shell it is bounded by", "line": "l.ball\\paren{\\bar{R}}.count = \\bar{R}^{D}", "working": ["l.ball\\paren{\\bar{R}}.count = \\sum_{r}^{\\bar{R}} l.shell = \\bar{R}^{D}"], "because": "the places WITHIN R steps, which is the shell summed over every radius up to R - one power higher, by the same count of walks"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what reaches R steps out", "line": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "working": ["taken once in \\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} steps", "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}"], "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a body of that size sends", "line": "\\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho·l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}}", "working": ["l.shell at one = DEG, and only 1 - \\rho of the exits are dark", "the body is \\bar{R} cells thick", "shadowing lets out \\frac{\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the mass is that over the face it went through, l.shell(R)", "\\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho·l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}}"], "because": "EMISSION is the one rule a body owns, and all it says is how often. So a body's mass is that share, times the ways one cell has to announce itself, times the share of those that are dark enough to take it, times how many of its cells can get their rays out at all - which is `shadowing`, and which saturates at the skin because an inner cell's output is annihilated crossing its neighbours. IT IS PER UNIT OF THE BODY'S OWN FACE: the total goes as the shell and grows for ever, which is a fact about how much stuff there is rather than about what the stuff is. TWO THINGS ARE THE SOURCE'S, \\bar{m}_{x} and R; everything else here is a count of the tiling or a rate the rules already fixed"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}, {"name": "l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\bar{R}^{D - 1}", "because": "the places at exactly R steps out, which `ehrhart` counts off the ways out of a point - and at R = 1 it is the ways out themselves, so DEG is this same count read at one rather than a number of its own"}], "parts": [{"part": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "is": "l.\\bar{m}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}, {"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "\\bar{R}^{D - 1}", "is": "l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "the places at exactly R steps out, which `ehrhart` counts off the ways out of a point - and at R = 1 it is the ways out themselves, so DEG is this same count read at one rather than a number of its own"}]}, "gravity.saturation": {"theorem": "gravity.saturation", "theory": "G", "asks": "and for a body far bigger than the distance one of its rays gets - what is left of that once its own depth has stopped mattering, as R goes to infinity?", "about": "\\bar{m}", "concluded": "\\bar{m} = \\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\frac{2·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{\\rho}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the ball and the shell it is bounded by", "line": "l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\bar{R}^{D - 1}", "working": ["l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\bar{R}^{D - 1}", "l.shell(1) = DEG = DEG"], "because": "the places at exactly R steps out, which `ehrhart` counts off the ways out of a point - and at R = 1 it is the ways out themselves, so DEG is this same count read at one rather than a number of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the ball and the shell it is bounded by", "line": "l.ball\\paren{\\bar{R}}.count = \\bar{R}^{D}", "working": ["l.ball\\paren{\\bar{R}}.count = \\sum_{r}^{\\bar{R}} l.shell = \\bar{R}^{D}"], "because": "the places WITHIN R steps, which is the shell summed over every radius up to R - one power higher, by the same count of walks"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what reaches R steps out", "line": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "working": ["taken once in \\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} steps", "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}"], "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a body of that size sends", "line": "\\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho·l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}}", "working": ["l.shell at one = DEG, and only 1 - \\rho of the exits are dark", "the body is \\bar{R} cells thick", "shadowing lets out \\frac{\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the mass is that over the face it went through, l.shell(R)", "\\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\bar{R}^{D - 1}·\\paren{1 - l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho·l.shell\\paren{\\bar{R}}}"], "because": "EMISSION is the one rule a body owns, and all it says is how often. So a body's mass is that share, times the ways one cell has to announce itself, times the share of those that are dark enough to take it, times how many of its cells can get their rays out at all - which is `shadowing`, and which saturates at the skin because an inner cell's output is annihilated crossing its neighbours. IT IS PER UNIT OF THE BODY'S OWN FACE: the total goes as the shell and grows for ever, which is a fact about how much stuff there is rather than about what the stuff is. TWO THINGS ARE THE SOURCE'S, \\bar{m}_{x} and R; everything else here is a count of the tiling or a rate the rules already fixed"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the mass, which is that at infinity", "line": "\\bar{m} = \\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "working": ["\\bar{m} = \\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}"], "because": "the mass is what a body announces per unit of the face it announces through, at the size where its own depth has stopped mattering - which is a limit, and is written as one"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "gravity.doppler": {"theorem": "gravity.doppler", "theory": "G", "asks": "a body that is going somewhere shines on fewer of its ticks, and what it does send arrives closer together ahead of it than behind. What is that worth?", "about": "\\mathcal{D}", "concluded": "\\mathcal{D} = \\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what motion does to what a body sends", "line": "\\mathcal{D} = \\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "working": ["EMISSION is gated on not(moving), so it shines on 1 - \\beta of its ticks", "that is the same every way, so it is in \\bar{m} and not here", "one cell a tick, so \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart", "\\mathcal{D} = \\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}"], "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "transport.screened": {"theorem": "transport.screened", "theory": "G", "asks": "a shortfall spreads out from a body and is damped as it goes. With the two bodies and the shell they share divided out, what is left of the journey?", "about": "T_{vac} at D = 3", "concluded": "T_{vac} \\aside{at} D \\aside{= 3} = n_{f} + 1", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}"], "because": "the near body prevents an expansion, that shortfall spreads, and the far one is pushed into it because fewer rays arrive from that side. NEITHER BODY HAS TO EMIT ANYTHING for this one - it is the making that did not happen, carried out to R and met by whatever is open to it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "\\bar{r} = m.distance\\paren{m'}", "working": ["\\bar{r} = m.distance\\paren{m'}"], "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "T_{vac} = \\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["the vacuum's channel = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}", "over the two bodies, \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}, and over the shell they share:", "T_{vac} = the channel over its bodies over \\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}} = \\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "T_{vac} \\aside{at} D \\aside{= 3} = \\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["T_{vac} = \\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "D = 3"], "because": "the screened transport in three dimensions"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "\\omega", "is": "what share of a step advances", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. the streaming term is gated: a ray hands over only where the way it drew leads somewhere, and where it does not it makes the room and waits instead. That gate is on the transport, so it is on the speed - and its complement is on the waiting, which is the other arm of the same either and the only other thing in these rules that makes space. One share, both lines"}]}, "transport.exchange": {"theorem": "transport.exchange", "theory": "G", "asks": "and the other route, which needs both bodies to be shining rather than one to be open - what does that carry, once the same two things are divided out?", "about": "T_{met} at D = 3", "concluded": "T_{met} \\aside{at} D \\aside{= 3} = \\frac{4·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}}}{\\bar{r}} + 1", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is pushed back is screened", "line": "\\delta screened = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["nothing restores \\delta, so survives(r) = 1", "\\delta = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "nothing in the line pushes \\delta back, so the chance of surviving one step is one and the chance of surviving r of them is one. What is left at r is what spread there, and the dilution is the whole of the law"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what is there per site, times the sites it has", "line": "what a body is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["the emitting side is \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and the far body is the same law about the far body", "what it is open to = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body is open the way it is emitting: on its skin. The rules never say that a cell hidden behind another can still take what the front one stopped, and `shadowing` is the same argument whichever way the rays are going - so what a body is open to is its own mass, the same law the emitting side is written in, and not a count of its cells times the ways out of one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a source puts out survives its own transport for the same reason a shortfall does - a turn that keeps the heading loses none of it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out goes every way alike", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a body lights its exits alike, so what leaves it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: what a body puts out/shell = what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "what a body puts out per site = \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "two bodies make meetings neither makes alone", "line": "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["n_{A}+n_{B} squared has a cross piece 2n_{A}n_{B}", "each thins as \\frac{what a body puts out·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "\\sum_{l} n_{A}n_{B} is largest at either end, cut off at \\bar{c}", "1 means \\bar{r} cells is \\bar{r} ticks, and a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick", "two rays a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart, so what arrives per tick goes as the reciprocal - one factor per body", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic is one body's radiation meeting the other's, summed along the line between them. Each body's thins as the shell grows, so the product is large only near one of them - and how near is bounded by a step, which is the only length the lattice has. Two ends, each contributing the far density times the near sum cut off at one step. AND EACH END CARRIES A DOPPLER FACTOR, which is not put in: one cell a tick makes a distance a time, a body crosses \\beta of a cell a tick, so two rays sent a tick apart land 1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} ticks apart and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. That is the classical factor, derived from the two rules and directional because only the motion ALONG the line changes when a ray gets there"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the rest of the integral, which is a logarithm", "line": "met(R) in full = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'", "working": ["s = Ru turns \\int \\frac{ds}{s^{a}(R-s)^{a}} into R^{1-2a}\\int \\frac{du}{u^{a}(1-u)^{a}},\\quad a = D - 1", "(1-u)^{-a} = \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k}", "so the integrand is \\sum_{k}\\binom{a+k-1}{k}u^{k-a} - a power at every k except k = a-1, which is u^{-1}", "\\int u^{-1}du = \\ln u, taken between \\bar{c}/R and 1 - \\bar{c}/R", "two ends, so 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "met(R) = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'"], "because": "the leading term is the two ends of the line, where the product of the two thinning populations is largest. The rest of the line contributes as well, and one term of the series about either end is a simple pole - which integrates to a logarithm of the separation against a step rather than to a power. It falls off one power faster than the leading term, so it is a correction that matters close in and vanishes far out, which is what a near field IS"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what a body puts out = l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what a body puts out, which stands on every term of it alike", "the term is \\omegal.\\bar{m}"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. what a body puts out is the term no rewrite puts there, scaled by what its gates let through - and a body going somewhere has spent that share of its ticks moving rather than shining, which is the whole of why a moving source is shifted. AND IT IS NAMED \\bar{m}_{x} BECAUSE THAT IS ITS NAME - how often per tick a source activates one direction, a fraction of \\bar{c} whose period is 1/\\bar{m}_{x}. Calling the same number \\Sigma_{0} here made the medium's ledger and the source's own rate look like two quantities, and every law that touched both then carried the seam between them"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what one puts in, thinned, times what the other is open to", "line": "the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "working": ["the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}"], "because": "the cross piece of the quadratic: one body's radiation meeting the other's. It needs BOTH to be shining, which is why it carries both masses and the motion factor twice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "\\bar{r} = m.distance\\paren{m'}", "working": ["\\bar{r} = m.distance\\paren{m'}"], "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "T_{met} = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "working": ["the meetings' channel = \\frac{1}{\\sigma^{2}·F^{2}·\\rho^{2}}·l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}^{2}·\\omega^{2}·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·A'·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}'}}·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}' + 2·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\bar{r}^{3 - 2·D}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}·\\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'}", "over the same two bodies and the same shell:", "T_{met} = the channel over its bodies over \\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}} = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}"], "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the bodies, the separation, and what carries between them", "line": "T_{met} \\aside{at} D \\aside{= 3} = \\frac{2·\\sigma·F}{\\bar{c}} + \\frac{4·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}{\\bar{r}}", "working": ["T_{met} = 2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "D = 3"], "because": "the exchange transport in three dimensions"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}], "parts": [{"part": "2", "is": "what bodies' rays grow where they meet", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. ANNIHILATION read on two bodies' rays: each still leaves the point behind it where the way behind is dark, and behind a body's ray - lit by a source, not by CREATE, and met in the vacuum's dark half - nothing stands, so both gates are open"}]}, "gravity.schwarzschild": {"theorem": "gravity.schwarzschild", "theory": "G", "asks": "the metric this model derives has Schwarzschild's shape. Written in Schwarzschild's own names, what is it - and where do the two theories actually part?", "about": "A in r as GR writes it", "concluded": "A in r as GR writes it = 1 - r_{s}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}", "beneath": [], "also": "A in r = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}", "leads": "AS GENERAL RELATIVITY WRITES IT — and it is the whole function rather than an expansion of one, so light bends by twice the Newtonian amount, a clock runs slow by what a ruler is stretched by, and the perihelion advances by 3πr_s/a. Every classical test reads the metric, and every one of them comes out as Einstein gives it.", "then": "AND THE SAME THING AS THIS MODEL DERIVES IT — the record a body adds to what a ray crosses. Reading the two against each other says the blocking mass IS the Schwarzschild radius, in cells. THE DEVIATION IS NOT HERE: it is that general relativity has the metric and the force as ONE object, and this has them as two derivations sourced by two different masses - and that the force carries a recursion the metric knows nothing of.", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what swings a heading = \\nabla n_{f}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what swings a heading, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line's direction term is the kernel's first moment - which way a turn leans on average"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place stands for, counted off what a fold does", "line": "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}", "working": ["a ray crosses where it stands: one tick per point the place stands for", "fold joins what was behind each point onto the other, so the count is transitive", "folds along the path: \\delta n_{f}", "N = 1 + n_{f} + n_{f}^{2} + ... = \\frac{1}{1 - n_{f}}", "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere, one tick per point the place stands for - so the index IS that count. What the count is comes off `fold`, which joins what was behind each of the two points onto the other: a place that swallows another inherits what THAT place stood for, including whatever it had already swallowed. So it is a sum over CHAINS of folds rather than a tally of them, which is geometric and comes to 1/(1 - n). It converges because `unfold` hands a point back at every free point, so the chains are cut off by the same balance the space ledger is written in. Continuum ray optics would exponentiate here instead - that is the right sum where a path picks up a little at a time, and this lattice folds a whole point at a time"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "an index is a metric", "line": "A in r = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}", "working": ["MOVEMENT: one tick per point the place stands for", "a place standing for N points gets through 1/N per tick, so d\\tau/dt = 1/N", "A = \\paren{d\\tau/dt}^{2} = 1/N^{2} = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere - ONE TICK PER POINT THE PLACE STANDS FOR. So anything happening at a place that stands for N points gets through 1/N as much of itself per tick of the world, which is what a slow clock IS here. THIS FIXES THE TIME PART ON ITS OWN: it is not read off a ratio to the space part, and there is no freedom left over once it is said. AND THE RATE IS THE ROOT OF THE COEFFICIENT, NOT THE COEFFICIENT. `A` multiplies `dt^{2}` in the line element, so a clock ticking at `d\\tau/dt` sits at `A = \\paren{d\\tau/dt}^{2}`. What MOVEMENT counts is the RATE, `1/N`, so the coefficient is `1/N^{2}` - and THAT IS WHERE THE FACTOR OF TWO LIVED. Squaring gives `A = 1 - 2\\delta n_{f}`, which is general relativity's `1 - 2\\Phi`, and it is not put there: it is one count entering a square. Light going at the root of A over B is then a consequence rather than the premise"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the metric as general relativity writes it", "line": "A in r as GR writes it = 1 - r_{s}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}", "working": ["A = 1 - r_{s}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}", "B = \\frac{1}{1 - r_{s}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}", "\\gamma = 1, and A·B = 1 as Schwarzschild has it"], "because": "the same metric in Schwarzschild's names. IT IS THE WHOLE FUNCTION AND NOT AN EXPANSION: `A = 1 - r_{s}/r` and `B = 1/\\paren{1 - r_{s}/r}` is what this model derives, so light bends by twice the Newtonian amount, `\\gamma` is one, and the perihelion advances by `3\\pi r_{s}/a`. WHERE THE TWO THEORIES PART is not here - it is that general relativity has the metric and the force as ONE object and this has them as two derivations sourced by two different masses, and that the force carries a recursion the metric knows nothing about"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "r_{s}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "the record a body adds falls off as `r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}` and the metric is the SQUARE of one less it, so its linear term is TWICE the record and at three dimensions `A = 1 - 2\\bar{m}/r`. Read against `A = 1 - r_{s}/r` that says `r_{s} = 2\\bar{m}` - and the force law fixes `GM = \\bar{m}`, so this is `r_{s} = 2GM`, THE SCHWARZSCHILD RADIUS ITSELF and not half of it. Nothing is fitted: the two are read off each other and the two comes from the square"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "gravity.gauss": {"theorem": "gravity.gauss", "theory": "G", "asks": "general relativity has a flux law behind it. Do these rules give one, and is it the same one?", "about": "the flux through any shell", "concluded": "the flux through any shell = \\delta", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the flux through any shell = \\delta", "working": ["shell = r^{D - 1}", "what is at each = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "how fast = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "their product = \\delta, which carries no r"], "because": "GAUSS'S LAW, and it comes out as an identity rather than a postulate. Count what crosses a shell in one tick: the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward. `spreading` has all three and `MOVEMENT` neither makes nor destroys, so the product is the SOURCE and is the same at every radius - which is what a flux law says. General relativity gets the same statement out of the Bianchi identity; here it is arithmetic"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "gravity.potential": {"theorem": "gravity.potential", "theory": "G", "asks": "and the potential that flux implies - is it the one general relativity uses?", "about": "\\Phi", "concluded": "\\Phi = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the flux through any shell = \\delta", "working": ["shell = r^{D - 1}", "what is at each = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "how fast = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "their product = \\delta, which carries no r"], "because": "GAUSS'S LAW, and it comes out as an identity rather than a postulate. Count what crosses a shell in one tick: the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward. `spreading` has all three and `MOVEMENT` neither makes nor destroys, so the product is the SOURCE and is the same at every radius - which is what a flux law says. General relativity gets the same statement out of the Bianchi identity; here it is arithmetic"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\Phi = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "working": ["the force falls as r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "\\Phi = \\int, one power weaker = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}"], "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\bar{m}", "is": "\\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "the mass is what a body announces per unit of the face it announces through, at the size where its own depth has stopped mattering - which is a limit, and is written as one"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "is": "T_{met}", "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}]}, "gravity.poisson": {"theorem": "gravity.poisson", "theory": "G", "asks": "Poisson's equation is the weak field limit of Einstein's. Do these rules give it?", "about": "\\nabla^{2}\\Phi", "concluded": "\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = 0", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the flux through any shell = \\delta", "working": ["shell = r^{D - 1}", "what is at each = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "how fast = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "their product = \\delta, which carries no r"], "because": "GAUSS'S LAW, and it comes out as an identity rather than a postulate. Count what crosses a shell in one tick: the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward. `spreading` has all three and `MOVEMENT` neither makes nor destroys, so the product is the SOURCE and is the same at every radius - which is what a flux law says. General relativity gets the same statement out of the Bianchi identity; here it is arithmetic"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\Phi = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "working": ["the force falls as r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "\\Phi = \\int, one power weaker = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}"], "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = 0", "working": ["the flux through any shell is the same at every radius", "so the divergence away from the source is nothing"], "because": "POISSON'S EQUATION, in the vacuum. A potential whose flux is conserved and whose sources are all in one place satisfies `\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = 0` everywhere else - which is what conserving the flux MEANS, read as a differential rather than as an integral. General relativity's weak field limit is `\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = 4\\pi G\\rho`, the same statement with the source put back"}], "standingFor": [], "parts": []}, "gravity.geodesic": {"theorem": "gravity.geodesic", "theory": "G", "asks": "general relativity moves a body along a geodesic of the metric. These rules hand it the momentum of what arrives. Do the two come to the same equation of motion?", "about": "the equation of motion", "concluded": "the equation of motion = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\bar{r}} + 1}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the flux through any shell = \\delta", "working": ["shell = r^{D - 1}", "what is at each = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "how fast = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "their product = \\delta, which carries no r"], "because": "GAUSS'S LAW, and it comes out as an identity rather than a postulate. Count what crosses a shell in one tick: the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward. `spreading` has all three and `MOVEMENT` neither makes nor destroys, so the product is the SOURCE and is the same at every radius - which is what a flux law says. General relativity gets the same statement out of the Bianchi identity; here it is arithmetic"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\Phi = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "working": ["the force falls as r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "\\Phi = \\int, one power weaker = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}"], "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the equation of motion = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "working": ["a = -\\nabla\\Phi = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "general relativity: the weak field limit of the geodesic equation", "these rules: momentum per tick from what arrives"], "because": "THE GEODESIC EQUATION, in its weak field form `a = -\\nabla\\Phi`. General relativity gets this by making a body follow a geodesic of the metric; THESE RULES GET IT WITHOUT ONE - `propel` hands a body the momentum of what arrives at it, and what arrives is the flux, so the acceleration is the gradient of the potential. Two different arguments, the same equation, and neither borrowed from the other"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\bar{m}", "is": "\\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "the mass is what a body announces per unit of the face it announces through, at the size where its own depth has stopped mattering - which is a limit, and is written as one"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "is": "T_{met}", "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}]}, "gravity.field": {"theorem": "gravity.field", "theory": "G", "asks": "Einstein's equation relates the curvature to the source. Do these rules give that relation, and with what coupling?", "about": "the field equation", "concluded": "the field equation = 1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the flux through any shell = \\delta", "working": ["shell = r^{D - 1}", "what is at each = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "how fast = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "their product = \\delta, which carries no r"], "because": "GAUSS'S LAW, and it comes out as an identity rather than a postulate. Count what crosses a shell in one tick: the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward. `spreading` has all three and `MOVEMENT` neither makes nor destroys, so the product is the SOURCE and is the same at every radius - which is what a flux law says. General relativity gets the same statement out of the Bianchi identity; here it is arithmetic"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\Phi = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "working": ["the force falls as r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "\\Phi = \\int, one power weaker = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}"], "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "A, off the record a ray crosses = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "working": ["the record a body adds is \\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and that is \\Phi, so A = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "general relativity: A = 1 - 2\\Phi, which is this to first order"], "because": "THE METRIC. `metricOf` reads it off the record a ray crosses, and that record IS the potential - the same accumulation, derived twice - so `\\delta n_{f}` and `\\Phi` are one quantity and this is that substitution. WHAT COMES OUT IS EINSTEIN'S, INCLUDING THE TWO: `metricOf` gives `A` as the SQUARE of the tick rate, because a metric coefficient multiplies `dt^{2}` while MOVEMENT counts `d\\tau/dt`, and the square of `1 - \\Phi` is `1 - 2\\Phi` to first order. THE FACTOR OF TWO THIS MODEL WAS SHORT BY WAS A ROOT MISTAKEN FOR A COEFFICIENT, and nothing was added to fix it. What is left over is the second order term, which is a real difference from Schwarzschild's exact `1 - r_{s}/r` and shows up only where the field is strong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\kappa = \\frac{\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}}}{2·\\Phi}", "working": ["A = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}, so 1 - A = 1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "Einstein: 1 - A = 2\\Phi", "so this model is Einstein's times \\frac{\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}}}{2·\\Phi}"], "because": "WHAT EINSTEIN'S COUPLING HAS TO BE MULTIPLIED BY to give this model's. `1 - A = 2\\Phi` is general relativity's; here it is `2\\Phi` times this. FAR FROM ANYTHING IT IS A HALF - the screened channel has died, the exchange one has gone to its constant, and what is left is the factor of two the deflection is short by. NEAR A BODY IT IS NOT: it carries both transports, so the correction is itself a function of distance and the model departs from Einstein by more than a constant where the field is strong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the field equation = 1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "working": ["A = 1 - \\Phi, so \\nabla^{2}A = -\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = -4\\pi G\\rho", "Einstein: A = 1 - 2\\Phi, so \\nabla^{2}A = -2\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = -8\\pi G\\rho", "same source, same motion, half the coupling"], "because": "EINSTEIN'S FIELD EQUATION, in the weak static field where it is a statement about one function. `G_{\\mu\\nu} = 8\\pi G T_{\\mu\\nu}` comes to `\\nabla^{2}A = -2\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = -8\\pi G\\rho`: the curvature of the time part answers the mass density, with a coupling of `8\\pi G`. THESE RULES GIVE THE SAME EQUATION WITH HALF THAT COUPLING - `\\nabla^{2}A = -\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = -4\\pi G\\rho` - because the record a ray crosses enters the metric once where Einstein's potential enters twice. SO THE DIFFERENCE IS NOT IN WHAT SOURCES GRAVITY, which is the same `\\rho` through the same Poisson equation, NOR IN HOW A BODY MOVES, which comes out as the geodesic gives it. It is one number in front, and it is a factor of two"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\Phi", "is": "\\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\text{T_{met}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"name": "\\bar{m}", "is": "\\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "the mass is what a body announces per unit of the face it announces through, at the size where its own depth has stopped mattering - which is a limit, and is written as one"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "T_{met}", "is": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}, {"part": "\\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "is": "A, off the record a ray crosses", "because": "THE METRIC. `metricOf` reads it off the record a ray crosses, and that record IS the potential - the same accumulation, derived twice - so `\\delta n_{f}` and `\\Phi` are one quantity and this is that substitution. WHAT COMES OUT IS EINSTEIN'S, INCLUDING THE TWO: `metricOf` gives `A` as the SQUARE of the tick rate, because a metric coefficient multiplies `dt^{2}` while MOVEMENT counts `d\\tau/dt`, and the square of `1 - \\Phi` is `1 - 2\\Phi` to first order. THE FACTOR OF TWO THIS MODEL WAS SHORT BY WAS A ROOT MISTAKEN FOR A COEFFICIENT, and nothing was added to fix it. What is left over is the second order term, which is a real difference from Schwarzschild's exact `1 - r_{s}/r` and shows up only where the field is strong"}]}, "gravity.coupling": {"theorem": "gravity.coupling", "theory": "G", "asks": "Einstein's field equation has one number in front of the source. What does this model put there instead?", "about": "\\kappa", "concluded": "\\kappa = \\frac{\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}}}{2·\\Phi}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the flux through any shell = \\delta", "working": ["shell = r^{D - 1}", "what is at each = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "how fast = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "their product = \\delta, which carries no r"], "because": "GAUSS'S LAW, and it comes out as an identity rather than a postulate. Count what crosses a shell in one tick: the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward. `spreading` has all three and `MOVEMENT` neither makes nor destroys, so the product is the SOURCE and is the same at every radius - which is what a flux law says. General relativity gets the same statement out of the Bianchi identity; here it is arithmetic"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\Phi = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "working": ["the force falls as r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "\\Phi = \\int, one power weaker = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}"], "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "A, off the record a ray crosses = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "working": ["the record a body adds is \\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and that is \\Phi, so A = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "general relativity: A = 1 - 2\\Phi, which is this to first order"], "because": "THE METRIC. `metricOf` reads it off the record a ray crosses, and that record IS the potential - the same accumulation, derived twice - so `\\delta n_{f}` and `\\Phi` are one quantity and this is that substitution. WHAT COMES OUT IS EINSTEIN'S, INCLUDING THE TWO: `metricOf` gives `A` as the SQUARE of the tick rate, because a metric coefficient multiplies `dt^{2}` while MOVEMENT counts `d\\tau/dt`, and the square of `1 - \\Phi` is `1 - 2\\Phi` to first order. THE FACTOR OF TWO THIS MODEL WAS SHORT BY WAS A ROOT MISTAKEN FOR A COEFFICIENT, and nothing was added to fix it. What is left over is the second order term, which is a real difference from Schwarzschild's exact `1 - r_{s}/r` and shows up only where the field is strong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\kappa = \\frac{\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}}}{2·\\Phi}", "working": ["A = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}, so 1 - A = 1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "Einstein: 1 - A = 2\\Phi", "so this model is Einstein's times \\frac{\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}}}{2·\\Phi}"], "because": "WHAT EINSTEIN'S COUPLING HAS TO BE MULTIPLIED BY to give this model's. `1 - A = 2\\Phi` is general relativity's; here it is `2\\Phi` times this. FAR FROM ANYTHING IT IS A HALF - the screened channel has died, the exchange one has gone to its constant, and what is left is the factor of two the deflection is short by. NEAR A BODY IT IS NOT: it carries both transports, so the correction is itself a function of distance and the model departs from Einstein by more than a constant where the field is strong"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\Phi", "is": "\\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\text{T_{met}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"name": "\\bar{m}", "is": "\\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "the mass is what a body announces per unit of the face it announces through, at the size where its own depth has stopped mattering - which is a limit, and is written as one"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "T_{met}", "is": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "\\frac{1}{2}", "is": "F", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"part": "1 - \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "is": "the field equation", "because": "EINSTEIN'S FIELD EQUATION, in the weak static field where it is a statement about one function. `G_{\\mu\\nu} = 8\\pi G T_{\\mu\\nu}` comes to `\\nabla^{2}A = -2\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = -8\\pi G\\rho`: the curvature of the time part answers the mass density, with a coupling of `8\\pi G`. THESE RULES GIVE THE SAME EQUATION WITH HALF THAT COUPLING - `\\nabla^{2}A = -\\nabla^{2}\\Phi = -4\\pi G\\rho` - because the record a ray crosses enters the metric once where Einstein's potential enters twice. SO THE DIFFERENCE IS NOT IN WHAT SOURCES GRAVITY, which is the same `\\rho` through the same Poisson equation, NOR IN HOW A BODY MOVES, which comes out as the geodesic gives it. It is one number in front, and it is a factor of two"}]}, "gravity.einstein": {"theorem": "gravity.einstein", "theory": "G", "asks": "and the metric in terms of that potential - does it come out as general relativity writes it?", "about": "A, off the record a ray crosses", "concluded": "A, off the record a ray crosses = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "the folds line nets = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: the folds line nets, which stands on every term of it alike", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} into folds 1", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "ANNIHILATION: \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "CREATION: \\nu\\frac{n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho}}{DEG} into folds -DEG", "CREATION: \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n into folds 0", "MOVEMENT: \\sigma\\omegan into folds 0"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. every term of the line does something to the folds ledger - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the count one firing puts in - and what the ledger does per point per tick is those added up. Nothing is left out and nothing is counted twice, which is the whole reason for reading it off the line rather than assembling it again wherever it is wanted"}, {"kind": "rule", "via": "EMISSION", "line": "what a body feels = \\sum\\hat{d}", "working": ["each absorbed ray adds its exit", "force = \\sum \\hat{d} over what arrives"], "because": "the rule adds the ray's own exit to the body's momentum, once per ray taken - so what a body feels is the vector sum of the directions that arrived at it, and a count of them would be a different quantity that is not what any rule computes"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "S = 0", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires because a point is neutral, and matter is not - so what a body puts into the medium is exactly the making that did not happen where it sits. Its strength is that term, and is not a quantity of its own"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is taken = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "working": ["read off the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION takes at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what is made = \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "working": ["read off the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} of the continuous model: DEG rays a firing, at rate \\nu, on the share 1 - \\rho of the matches, of degree 0 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. CREATION makes at \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - its rate, times what its gates let through, times the density to the power its quantifier gives"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where the making pays for the taking", "line": "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "working": ["\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}", "rays made a firing: DEG,  rays taken a meeting: -2", "a point is free when all DEG of its ways out are dark: \\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho}", "DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + -2·F·\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "\\rho_{\\infty} = \\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0"], "because": "the vacuum settles where a neutral point's splitting exactly pays for what the meetings take. That is one equation in one unknown and it has one root that is not negative - so the density is FIXED by the rules rather than chosen, and it is the same on every lattice"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "one over the rate it is removed at", "line": "\\lambda = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["removed at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} per \\rho", "\\lambda = 1/(\\sigma·F·\\rho) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what removes a ray is the meeting term, and a rate per unit of what is there is a rate per unit length once the density is settled. One over it is how far one carrier gets, which is the length everything else in this model is screened in"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "a body's own cells thin one another", "line": "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["each cell prevents 0", "a cell at depth d survives d steps: 1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho^{d}", "the body is \\bar{R} = m/A deep, so the sum runs to there and not past it", "\\sum_{d=0}^{T} q^{d} = \\lambda\\paren{1 - q^{T}}", "deep: that is \\lambda, the skin.  shallow: it is T, the whole of it", "what a body puts into the medium = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "a body prevents the making at every cell it owns, so what it HOLDS goes as its bulk. What it SENDS does not: a cell's output has to cross the cells outside it, and the meeting term thins it exactly as it thins one body's radiation against another's - the rule has no notion of which body a ray belongs to. A cell at depth d therefore reaches the outside attenuated by e^{-d/\\lambda}, and summing that over the depth leaves a geometric sum, and it is summed over the cells there ACTUALLY ARE - down to the body's own depth, m/A, rather than down to infinity. ITS TWO LIMITS ARE THE TWO CASES AND NOTHING CHOOSES BETWEEN THEM: a body deeper than a mean free path sends its skin and goes as its AREA, and one shallower than a mean free path has nothing shadowed and goes as its MASS. Which it is, is what the mean free path says"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "working": ["\\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}"], "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\delta is conserved on its way out", "working": ["read off the continuous model: \\delta, which stands on every term of it alike", "every one of the 11 terms the line carries is a rule acting on the match it was handed", "none of them consults anything outside it, so agreement is carried and disagreement is only moved", "the DENSITY is pushed back at a = 2·\\rho·\\sigma·F + \\nu + \\frac{\\nu·n_{f}}{DEG} + \\nu·n_{f} - \\sigma·\\paren{1 - \\omega} - \\sigma·\\omega, which is a different quantity"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rule reads the refs its match handed over and nothing else, so two worlds that agree about a match agree after it - a difference between them can be moved and cannot be made or unmade. What a meeting takes from the disturbed world it leaves as a hole in the undisturbed one, and the difference is the same size. So as much of the shortfall crosses a far shell as a near one, which is what the dilution argument wants"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the lattice", "line": "\\delta goes every way alike", "working": [], "because": "the tiling has no preferred direction, so what spreads through it goes every way alike"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how many places are r steps out", "line": "shell grows as r^{D - 1}", "working": ["exits(p): the ways out of a point, DEG of them", "steps: where one exit leads - and that is all the rules say about where anything is", "D of those ways are independent, so places within r steps ∝ r^{D}", "shell(r) = ball(r) - ball(r-1) ∝ r^{D-1}"], "because": "the rules give a point, DEG ways out of it, and where each one leads - and nothing else about where anything is. So how far is how many steps were taken, and how many places are that far out is a count of walks. D is how many of those ways are independent, so within r steps there are r choices along each of D and the places within r go as r^{D}; the places at exactly r are the difference between two of those, which is r^{D-1}. Every step is whole and every place counted once, so this is the count itself and not an approximation to one"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "spreading", "line": "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "working": ["what crosses one site: \\delta/shell = \\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "and it dwells 1/v there, with v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1} off turns's own draw", "\\delta per site = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}"], "because": "count what crosses a shell in one tick - the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward - and MOVEMENT neither makes nor destroys, so that count is carried outward unchanged. So what CROSSES one site is the whole of it over the number of sites there are at that distance. What IS at one site is that again over how fast a share gets across, and how fast a share gets across is not a constant: a carrier with nowhere to step makes the room instead and does not move, so it dwells longer exactly where the medium is thin. Solving the conservation with that speed in it is one quadratic with one root that is not negative - the old line where the medium is dense, and a square root where it is not"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place has swallowed, where the folding pays for the handing back", "line": "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "working": ["the folds line: \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} - \\nu·n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 0", "linear in the record: \\nu·\\rho - \\nu·n_{f} + \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "the vacuum's own record: n_{f} = -\\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "at \\rho_{\\infty}, where DEG\\paren{1 - \\rho} = 2F\\rho^{2}, that is DEG/2", "and a body's, one power weaker than what it prevents: \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}"], "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "\\bar{c} = 1", "working": ["read off the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "how fast a carrier goes, which is the share of its step that was straight", "line": "v = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "working": ["turns: 1 way straight on against folds[d] ways out along d", "so a ray keeps its heading with 1/(1 + n_{f})", "v = \\bar{c}/(1 + n_{f}) = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "n_{f} small: v -> one cell a tick, and the carrier streams", "n_{f} large: v -> \\bar{c}/n_{f}, and it does not"], "because": "MOVEMENT does not simply move a ray one cell: it draws where the ray goes, one way straight on against the ways each direction was folded. A place that has swallowed n_{f} folds sends it straight with 1/(1 + n_{f}) and turns it otherwise, so what advances it OUTWARD is that share. It is statistical and it is local, and it applies wherever the vacuum has met itself - which is everywhere, unlike the waiting, which happens only where there is no cell at all and so only at the frontier"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "the flux through any shell = \\delta", "working": ["shell = r^{D - 1}", "what is at each = \\frac{\\delta·r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}·\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "how fast = \\frac{\\omega}{n_{f} + 1}", "their product = \\delta, which carries no r"], "because": "GAUSS'S LAW, and it comes out as an identity rather than a postulate. Count what crosses a shell in one tick: the sites on it, times what is at each, times the share of a step that went outward. `spreading` has all three and `MOVEMENT` neither makes nor destroys, so the product is the SOURCE and is the same at every radius - which is what a flux law says. General relativity gets the same statement out of the Bianchi identity; here it is arithmetic"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "\\Phi = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "working": ["the force falls as r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}", "\\Phi = \\int, one power weaker = \\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\paren{2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}"], "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "general relativity's equations, off these rules", "line": "A, off the record a ray crosses = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "working": ["the record a body adds is \\delta n_{f} = \\frac{l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "and that is \\Phi, so A = \\paren{1 - \\Phi}^{2}", "general relativity: A = 1 - 2\\Phi, which is this to first order"], "because": "THE METRIC. `metricOf` reads it off the record a ray crosses, and that record IS the potential - the same accumulation, derived twice - so `\\delta n_{f}` and `\\Phi` are one quantity and this is that substitution. WHAT COMES OUT IS EINSTEIN'S, INCLUDING THE TWO: `metricOf` gives `A` as the SQUARE of the tick rate, because a metric coefficient multiplies `dt^{2}` while MOVEMENT counts `d\\tau/dt`, and the square of `1 - \\Phi` is `1 - 2\\Phi` to first order. THE FACTOR OF TWO THIS MODEL WAS SHORT BY WAS A ROOT MISTAKEN FOR A COEFFICIENT, and nothing was added to fix it. What is left over is the second order term, which is a real difference from Schwarzschild's exact `1 - r_{s}/r` and shows up only where the field is strong"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\Phi", "is": "\\bar{m}·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\paren{T_{vac} + \\mathcal{D}·\\mathcal{D}'·\\text{T_{met}}}·\\paren{\\frac{a_{0}}{recur} + 1}", "because": "THE POTENTIAL. The flux is fixed and the sites it is shared between go as the shell, so what one site is open to falls as `r^{-\\paren{D - 1}}` and its integral - which is what a potential IS - falls one power weaker. Nobody types the exponent: it is the shell's, less one, and at three dimensions it is the `1/r` general relativity has"}, {"name": "\\bar{m}", "is": "\\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "the mass is what a body announces per unit of the face it announces through, at the size where its own depth has stopped mattering - which is a limit, and is written as one"}, {"name": "\\bar{r}", "is": "m.distance\\paren{m'}", "because": "the separation is what the pair has and neither body does - and it is not `R`, which in `massOf` is a body's own thickness. Two lengths that never met until a law was written with a mass in it"}, {"name": "T_{vac}", "is": "\\frac{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}}{\\omega}", "because": "the vacuum's channel with its two bodies and the shell divided out - a SCREENED transport, which is what is left of a shortfall that spread and was damped. The damping is a power and not an exponential because a carrier takes whole steps and on each one is either destroyed or not, and `L` is where damping balances dilution"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "\\mathcal{D}'", "is": "\\frac{1}{1 - \\beta'\\cdot\\hat{d}}", "because": "ONE MOTION, TWO EFFECTS, AND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS HERE. `EMISSION` is gated on `spare = not(moving)`, so a tick spent crossing a cell is a tick not spent shining and a body emits on 1 - \\beta of its ticks - THE SAME IN EVERY DIRECTION, so that is how much the body sends and it is already in the mass, inside the source's own choice, `l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}`. WHAT IS DIRECTIONAL IS THE OTHER HALF: `MOVEMENT` gives one cell a tick, so a distance IS a time, and between two emissions a tick apart the body has closed \\beta\\cdot\\hat{d} of the way to wherever the ray is going - they land that much closer together and what arrives per tick is the reciprocal. IT IS THE CLASSICAL DOPPLER FACTOR and nothing about waves or observers went into it. A body blocks the vacuum's making whether it moves or not, so this is on the meeting term and nowhere else"}, {"name": "T_{met}", "is": "2·\\sigma·F·\\bar{c}^{-\\paren{D - 2}} + 2·\\bar{r}^{2 - D}·\\binom{2·\\paren{D - 2}}{D - 2}·\\ln\\paren{\\frac{\\bar{r}}{\\bar{c}}}", "because": "the meetings' channel the same way - the interference term of the two bodies' own radiation, which is why it needs BOTH to be shining where the vacuum's needs only one to be open. It carries a different power of the separation, and the crossover between the two is what turns a rotation curve over"}, {"name": "a_{0}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\omega·\\sigma·F·\\paren{1 - \\rho}·\\rho^{2}}{\\paren{n_{f} + 1}·D}", "because": "THE SCALE IS THE EMPTY VACUUM'S OWN GROWTH, v H_{\\Lambda}, and it is the same at every place and every epoch. Read at the place, as the growth the matter there makes, it would change gravity where it is best measured (a planet's orbit) by far more than it allows unless the world's matter is too thin to lift anything; read as the age, or as the whole world's growth rate, a_{0} was three to four times larger at z = 2 and Genzel's six discs would carry dark fractions of 0.3 where they carry at most 0.2 - so neither. What does not change with the matter or the age is the vacuum's own growth, the rate at which its beat, left to itself, grows points: that is H_{\\Lambda}, and a_{0} = v H_{\\Lambda}. Measured, a_{0}/cH_{0} = v \\sqrt{\\Omega_{\\Lambda}}, a coincidence of this epoch. It was read before as: WHAT ENDS THE ACCUMULATION IS THE BEGINNING, not a meeting. A meeting ends a CARRIER, and the mean free path is how far one gets - but nothing of a body's rays is ended by the vacuum it rides through: what is sent at a distance is what was sent, spread, and the medium carries it as far as there is medium (`Medium` streams a body's rays with no absorption at all, and the pull it gives falls as the shell does and no faster). The phase, though, is counted in TICKS against the vacuum's own beat, and there have only ever been so many of them: the frontier grows one cell a tick, so the age is t_{0} = 1/H and the longest a mismatch can have been piling up is that. So the scale is v over the age, which is vH - and a_{0}/cH comes out as v itself, a count of the tiling and nothing else"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "n_{f}", "is": "\\text{\\delta n_{f}} - \\frac{\\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}}{\\nu·\\rho - \\nu}", "because": "a meeting leaves a fold and a creation over a held point takes one off, so what a place has swallowed is not a tally that only grows - it settles where its own line nets nought. THE LINE NETTING NEGATIVE DOES NOT MEAN THE LEVEL IS NOUGHT: the vacuum is working the whole time, and what stands is the rate folds are written over the rate one is cleared. The line is linear in the record, so that is a quotient and not a search - and at the settled density, where the making pays for the taking, it comes to DEG/2: one fold for every two ways, the record the vacuum keeps of its own. A BODY ADDS TO IT: what it prevents spreads, and an accumulation of what arrives is one power weaker than the flux. `turns` draws on the sum, so both belong"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\bar{c}", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n of the continuous model: 0 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share 1 - \\omega of the matches, of degree 1 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. every active ray goes ONE CELL along its own exit in one tick, which is what the streaming term says - so a step is one cell, and that is the only length the lattice has to measure anything else against"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "\\nu", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "gravity.deflection": {"theorem": "gravity.deflection", "theory": "G", "asks": "the metric bends light. Written in the mass the force law fixes, by how much - and does it agree with what was measured?", "about": "the deflection this model gives", "concluded": "the deflection this model gives = 2·r_{s}·b^{-\\paren{D - 2}}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": "WHAT THIS MODEL GIVES — light follows the index and the index is the metric, so a metric short by two bends light by half as much. This is Newton's value.", "then": "AND WHAT GENERAL RELATIVITY GIVES, which is what was measured in 1919 and since. This is the one place the difference is observable rather than absorbed into what a unit of mass means.", "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what swings a heading = \\nabla n_{f}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what swings a heading, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line's direction term is the kernel's first moment - which way a turn leans on average"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place stands for, counted off what a fold does", "line": "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}", "working": ["a ray crosses where it stands: one tick per point the place stands for", "fold joins what was behind each point onto the other, so the count is transitive", "folds along the path: \\delta n_{f}", "N = 1 + n_{f} + n_{f}^{2} + ... = \\frac{1}{1 - n_{f}}", "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere, one tick per point the place stands for - so the index IS that count. What the count is comes off `fold`, which joins what was behind each of the two points onto the other: a place that swallows another inherits what THAT place stood for, including whatever it had already swallowed. So it is a sum over CHAINS of folds rather than a tally of them, which is geometric and comes to 1/(1 - n). It converges because `unfold` hands a point back at every free point, so the chains are cut off by the same balance the space ledger is written in. Continuum ray optics would exponentiate here instead - that is the right sum where a path picks up a little at a time, and this lattice folds a whole point at a time"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "an index is a metric", "line": "A in r = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}", "working": ["MOVEMENT: one tick per point the place stands for", "a place standing for N points gets through 1/N per tick, so d\\tau/dt = 1/N", "A = \\paren{d\\tau/dt}^{2} = 1/N^{2} = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere - ONE TICK PER POINT THE PLACE STANDS FOR. So anything happening at a place that stands for N points gets through 1/N as much of itself per tick of the world, which is what a slow clock IS here. THIS FIXES THE TIME PART ON ITS OWN: it is not read off a ratio to the space part, and there is no freedom left over once it is said. AND THE RATE IS THE ROOT OF THE COEFFICIENT, NOT THE COEFFICIENT. `A` multiplies `dt^{2}` in the line element, so a clock ticking at `d\\tau/dt` sits at `A = \\paren{d\\tau/dt}^{2}`. What MOVEMENT counts is the RATE, `1/N`, so the coefficient is `1/N^{2}` - and THAT IS WHERE THE FACTOR OF TWO LIVED. Squaring gives `A = 1 - 2\\delta n_{f}`, which is general relativity's `1 - 2\\Phi`, and it is not put there: it is one count entering a square. Light going at the root of A over B is then a consequence rather than the premise"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "the metric as general relativity writes it", "line": "the deflection this model gives = 2·r_{s}·b^{-\\paren{D - 2}}", "working": ["the force law gives a = \\bar{m}/r^{2}, so GM = \\bar{m}", "the metric gives A = 1 - \\bar{m}/r, where GR has 1 - 2GM/r", "so \\alpha = 2GM/b here and 4GM/b in GR - short by exactly two"], "because": "light follows the index and the index is the record, so the bend is twice the record at closest approach. WRITTEN IN THE MASS THE FORCE LAW FIXES this is 2GM/b, which is NEWTON'S deflection - a stone's answer. General relativity gives 4GM/b and the measurement gives general relativity. The two differ by exactly two, everywhere and at every lattice, and THIS MODEL DOES NOT DERIVE THAT TWO: it would need the record to enter the metric twice over, and no rule here says it does. It is written as a mismatch because that is what it is"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "r_{s}", "is": "\\frac{2·\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "the record a body adds falls off as `r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}` and the metric is the SQUARE of one less it, so its linear term is TWICE the record and at three dimensions `A = 1 - 2\\bar{m}/r`. Read against `A = 1 - r_{s}/r` that says `r_{s} = 2\\bar{m}` - and the force law fixes `GM = \\bar{m}`, so this is `r_{s} = 2GM`, THE SCHWARZSCHILD RADIUS ITSELF and not half of it. Nothing is fitted: the two are read off each other and the two comes from the square"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "2", "is": "what bodies' rays grow where they meet", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. ANNIHILATION read on two bodies' rays: each still leaves the point behind it where the way behind is dark, and behind a body's ray - lit by a source, not by CREATE, and met in the vacuum's dark half - nothing stands, so both gates are open"}]}, "gravity.metric": {"theorem": "gravity.metric", "theory": "G", "asks": "light goes at one over the index. What metric is the medium, then?", "about": "A in r", "concluded": "A in r = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what swings a heading = \\nabla n_{f}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what swings a heading, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line's direction term is the kernel's first moment - which way a turn leans on average"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place stands for, counted off what a fold does", "line": "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}", "working": ["a ray crosses where it stands: one tick per point the place stands for", "fold joins what was behind each point onto the other, so the count is transitive", "folds along the path: \\delta n_{f}", "N = 1 + n_{f} + n_{f}^{2} + ... = \\frac{1}{1 - n_{f}}", "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere, one tick per point the place stands for - so the index IS that count. What the count is comes off `fold`, which joins what was behind each of the two points onto the other: a place that swallows another inherits what THAT place stood for, including whatever it had already swallowed. So it is a sum over CHAINS of folds rather than a tally of them, which is geometric and comes to 1/(1 - n). It converges because `unfold` hands a point back at every free point, so the chains are cut off by the same balance the space ledger is written in. Continuum ray optics would exponentiate here instead - that is the right sum where a path picks up a little at a time, and this lattice folds a whole point at a time"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "an index is a metric", "line": "A in r = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}", "working": ["MOVEMENT: one tick per point the place stands for", "a place standing for N points gets through 1/N per tick, so d\\tau/dt = 1/N", "A = \\paren{d\\tau/dt}^{2} = 1/N^{2} = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere - ONE TICK PER POINT THE PLACE STANDS FOR. So anything happening at a place that stands for N points gets through 1/N as much of itself per tick of the world, which is what a slow clock IS here. THIS FIXES THE TIME PART ON ITS OWN: it is not read off a ratio to the space part, and there is no freedom left over once it is said. AND THE RATE IS THE ROOT OF THE COEFFICIENT, NOT THE COEFFICIENT. `A` multiplies `dt^{2}` in the line element, so a clock ticking at `d\\tau/dt` sits at `A = \\paren{d\\tau/dt}^{2}`. What MOVEMENT counts is the RATE, `1/N`, so the coefficient is `1/N^{2}` - and THAT IS WHERE THE FACTOR OF TWO LIVED. Squaring gives `A = 1 - 2\\delta n_{f}`, which is general relativity's `1 - 2\\Phi`, and it is not put there: it is one count entering a square. Light going at the root of A over B is then a consequence rather than the premise"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\delta n_{f}", "is": "\\frac{\\text{l.\\bar{m}}·\\omega·A·\\paren{1 - \\text{l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}}}·r^{-\\paren{D - 2}}}{\\sigma·F·\\rho}", "because": "what a body ADDS to the fold record, over what the vacuum settles to on its own. The settled part is everywhere alike and is the vacuum's own index; this is the part that depends on where you are relative to a body, and it is what a metric is"}, {"name": "l.\\bar{m}", "is": "l.choose\\paren{\\bar{m}_{x·l.DEG·\\paren{1 - \\beta}}}", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line is written at a local, l, and what a source puts in there is its mass - a choice over that local's ways out: which of its l.DEG exits it lights, at \\bar{m}_{x} apiece, on the ticks its own rule leaves it. The gate the rule asked of the source is inside the choice because it is a statement about which exits, and the line carries nothing of the source but this"}, {"name": "\\omega", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. `outward` finds the point across the way, and where that point has been folded it follows it through to the hub it was folded into - so a way that led somewhere still does, hub or point. It comes back with nothing only where there is no point across the way at all, which is the edge of a finite world. The vacuum the line is written in is infinite: every way has a point across it, and the share of ways with room ahead is all of them"}, {"name": "\\sigma", "is": "1", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. a rewrite fires on every match it has, once a tick - that is what a rule of this model is. So its rate is ONE per match per tick, and the name on it says which rewrite rather than how often: there is nothing here to choose or to fit"}, {"name": "F", "is": "\\frac{1}{2}", "because": "the facing factor is (1 - d^·j^)/2 and j^ is what the opposing population is doing on average. Alike in every direction, that is nothing - so a meeting in an undisturbed vacuum carries exactly a half, and the two limits it interpolates are one head-on and nought co-moving"}, {"name": "\\rho", "is": "\\text{the } \\rho \\text{ where } DEG·\\paren{1 - \\rho} - 2·F·\\rho^{2} = 0", "because": "and the density the line's own terms carry IS that settled one, everywhere the line is about the vacuum rather than about a source - so a law written in terms of the density can be written in terms of the rates instead"}, {"name": "l.reach\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "is": "\\paren{1 - \\sigma·F·\\rho}^{\\bar{R}}", "because": "a ray on a heading is taken at one over the free path per step, so the share of what set out that is still on that heading R steps later is one less that, to the R. It is a count of the rays themselves and nothing else: a meeting that takes a ray writes a fold, and the fold is carried by the record and read back out by creation - so this is the NEAR field, the direct arrival, and it is what a body's own cells shadow one another by. Beyond a free path the body is still there, as record"}], "parts": [{"part": "-1", "is": "the space count of what is taken", "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - the term - \\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} of the continuous model: -2 rays a firing, at rate \\sigma, on the share F of the matches, of degree 2 in the density; what this fact takes from it is below. ANNIHILATION fires at \\sigma·F·\\rho^{2}, and ONE firing of it puts -1 into the space ledger - counted off the body, not written down. The two ledgers get different counts from the same firing, which is why they do not settle at the same density"}]}, "gravity.shadow": {"theorem": "gravity.shadow", "theory": "G", "asks": "the metric decides which rays a body keeps. How wide is the shadow it casts - and is that general relativity's?", "about": "b_{c}", "concluded": "b_{c} = \\frac{27·\\bar{m}}{4}", "beneath": [], "also": null, "leads": null, "then": null, "space": null, "standing": true, "missing": [], "cites": [], "steps": [{"kind": "theorem", "via": "the reading", "line": "the continuous model = DEG·\\nu·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + l.\\bar{m}·\\omega - 2·\\sigma·F·n^{2}", "working": ["(\\partial_{t} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}} + \\hat{d}·\\nabla_{l} + \\paren{\\nabla n_{f}}·\\nabla_{\\hat{d}})n = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\nu\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\omegal.\\bar{m}", "\\partial_{t}s = -\\sigmaFn\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\sigma0n\\tilde{n} + \\nun_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\rho} + \\sigma\\paren{1 - \\omega}n"], "because": "the rules, read as a line: every rule of the theory is a term, the reading having run each rule's program on a symbolic match and counted what it does to the population - what it makes, what it takes, what it carries, what a body puts in - so the line is what the rules come to as a crowd rather than a description of them. Everything a theorem of this theory stands on is a term of this line or a reading of one, so every premise below is read off it, and every derivation passes through it"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "read off the continuous model", "line": "what swings a heading = \\nabla n_{f}", "working": ["read off the continuous model: what swings a heading, which stands on every term of it alike"], "because": "READ OFF THE CONTINUOUS MODEL - not one term of it but all of them, since this is about how the line is made. the line's direction term is the kernel's first moment - which way a turn leans on average"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "what a place stands for, counted off what a fold does", "line": "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}", "working": ["a ray crosses where it stands: one tick per point the place stands for", "fold joins what was behind each point onto the other, so the count is transitive", "folds along the path: \\delta n_{f}", "N = 1 + n_{f} + n_{f}^{2} + ... = \\frac{1}{1 - n_{f}}", "N = \\frac{1}{1 - \\delta n_{f}}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere, one tick per point the place stands for - so the index IS that count. What the count is comes off `fold`, which joins what was behind each of the two points onto the other: a place that swallows another inherits what THAT place stood for, including whatever it had already swallowed. So it is a sum over CHAINS of folds rather than a tally of them, which is geometric and comes to 1/(1 - n). It converges because `unfold` hands a point back at every free point, so the chains are cut off by the same balance the space ledger is written in. Continuum ray optics would exponentiate here instead - that is the right sum where a path picks up a little at a time, and this lattice folds a whole point at a time"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "an index is a metric", "line": "A in r = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}", "working": ["MOVEMENT: one tick per point the place stands for", "a place standing for N points gets through 1/N per tick, so d\\tau/dt = 1/N", "A = \\paren{d\\tau/dt}^{2} = 1/N^{2} = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}"], "because": "MOVEMENT says a ray crosses where it stands before it goes anywhere - ONE TICK PER POINT THE PLACE STANDS FOR. So anything happening at a place that stands for N points gets through 1/N as much of itself per tick of the world, which is what a slow clock IS here. THIS FIXES THE TIME PART ON ITS OWN: it is not read off a ratio to the space part, and there is no freedom left over once it is said. AND THE RATE IS THE ROOT OF THE COEFFICIENT, NOT THE COEFFICIENT. `A` multiplies `dt^{2}` in the line element, so a clock ticking at `d\\tau/dt` sits at `A = \\paren{d\\tau/dt}^{2}`. What MOVEMENT counts is the RATE, `1/N`, so the coefficient is `1/N^{2}` - and THAT IS WHERE THE FACTOR OF TWO LIVED. Squaring gives `A = 1 - 2\\delta n_{f}`, which is general relativity's `1 - 2\\Phi`, and it is not put there: it is one count entering a square. Light going at the root of A over B is then a consequence rather than the premise"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "an index is a metric", "line": "B in r = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{-2}", "working": ["the same place HAS N points in it, so d\\ell/dr = N", "B = \\paren{d\\ell/dr}^{2} = N^{2} = \\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{-2}", "and A\\cdot B = 1 still, as Schwarzschild has it"], "because": "and the space part is the same count read the other way: a place that stands for N points HAS N points in it, so a ruler laid across it spans N where it would have spanned one. One count, two readings, and the rule gives both - which is why neither part had to be chosen and the pairing is not an assumption. AND IT IS SQUARED FOR THE SAME REASON THE TIME PART IS: a ruler reads `d\\ell/dr = \\sqrt{B}`, so `B = N^{2}`. The two squares keep `A\\cdot B = 1`, which is Schwarzschild's own relation and was true of the roots as well - so nothing about the shape changes, only the size of what the mass does"}, {"kind": "theorem", "via": "where a ray stops coming back", "line": "b_{c} = \\frac{27·\\bar{m}}{4}", "working": ["a ray turns where r\\sqrt{B/A} = b, and at three dimensions \\delta n_{f} = \\bar{m}/r", "\\bar{m}/b at the turning point = \\delta n_{f}·\\paren{1 - \\delta n_{f}}^{2}", "largest where its slope is nought: \\delta n_{f} = 0.333333, the photon sphere at r = 3.0000 \\bar{m}", "b_{c} = 6.7500 \\bar{m}", "general relativity's metric read the same way: b_{c} = 5.1962 \\bar{m}, which is 3\\sqrt{3}", "so at the same \\bar{m} this shadow is 29.90 per cent wider"], "because": "THE SHADOW, off the metric alone. A null ray in `A dt^{2} = B\\paren{dr^{2} + r^{2}d\\Omega^{2}}` turns where `r\\sqrt{B/A} = b`, and one aimed inside the least value of that never turns - it is kept. So the shadow's edge is that least value, and where it is taken is the photon sphere. THE SAME MASS IS IN BOTH: `\\bar{m}` is the one the record is written in, `\\delta n_{f} = \\bar{m}/r`, which to first order is general relativity's `GM`. So the two differ only where the SECOND order term of the metric matters - near a photon sphere and nowhere a planet goes. What an instrument compares against is a mass measured some other way, and in this model that is the force law's, not the metric's"}], "standingFor": [{"name": "\\bar{m}", "is": "\\lim_{R \\to \\infty} \\bar{m}\\paren{\\bar{R}}", "because": "the mass is what a body announces per unit of the face it announces through, at the size where its own depth has stopped mattering - which is a limit, and is written as one"}], "parts": []}}}