newbamboo-evented-rspec 1.1.12

data/lib/spec/matchers/be_close.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should be_close(expected, delta)
+    #   should_not be_close(expected, delta)
+    #
+    # Passes if actual == expected +/- delta
+    #
+    # == Example
+    #
+    #   result.should be_close(3.0, 0.5)
+    def be_close(expected, delta)
+      simple_matcher do |actual, matcher|
+        matcher.failure_message = "expected #{expected} +/- (< #{delta}), got #{actual}"
+        matcher.description = "be close to #{expected} (within +- #{delta})"
+        (actual - expected).abs < delta
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/lib/spec/matchers/change.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    
+    #Based on patch from Wilson Bilkovich
+    class Change #:nodoc:
+      def initialize(receiver=nil, message=nil, &block)
+        @message = message || "result"
+        @value_proc = block || lambda {
+          receiver.__send__(message)
+        }
+      end
+      
+      def matches?(event_proc)
+        raise_block_syntax_error if block_given?
+        
+        @before = evaluate_value_proc
+        event_proc.call
+        @after = evaluate_value_proc
+        
+        return false if @from unless @from == @before
+        return false if @to unless @to == @after
+        return (@before + @amount == @after) if @amount
+        return ((@after - @before) >= @minimum) if @minimum
+        return ((@after - @before) <= @maximum) if @maximum        
+        return @before != @after
+      end
+      
+      def raise_block_syntax_error
+        raise MatcherError.new(<<-MESSAGE
+block passed to should or should_not change must use {} instead of do/end
+MESSAGE
+        )
+      end
+      
+      def evaluate_value_proc
+        @value_proc.call
+      end
+      
+      def failure_message
+        if @to
+          "#{@message} should have been changed to #{@to.inspect}, but is now #{@after.inspect}"
+        elsif @from
+          "#{@message} should have initially been #{@from.inspect}, but was #{@before.inspect}"
+        elsif @amount
+          "#{@message} should have been changed by #{@amount.inspect}, but was changed by #{actual_delta.inspect}"
+        elsif @minimum
+          "#{@message} should have been changed by at least #{@minimum.inspect}, but was changed by #{actual_delta.inspect}"
+        elsif @maximum
+          "#{@message} should have been changed by at most #{@maximum.inspect}, but was changed by #{actual_delta.inspect}"
+        else
+          "#{@message} should have changed, but is still #{@before.inspect}"
+        end
+      end
+      
+      def actual_delta
+        @after - @before
+      end
+      
+      def negative_failure_message
+        "#{@message} should not have changed, but did change from #{@before.inspect} to #{@after.inspect}"
+      end
+      
+      def by(amount)
+        @amount = amount
+        self
+      end
+      
+      def by_at_least(minimum)
+        @minimum = minimum
+        self
+      end
+      
+      def by_at_most(maximum)
+        @maximum = maximum
+        self
+      end      
+      
+      def to(to)
+        @to = to
+        self
+      end
+      
+      def from (from)
+        @from = from
+        self
+      end
+    end
+    
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should change(receiver, message, &block)
+    #   should change(receiver, message, &block).by(value)
+    #   should change(receiver, message, &block).from(old).to(new)
+    #   should_not change(receiver, message, &block)
+    #
+    # Allows you to specify that a Proc will cause some value to change.
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     team.add_player(player) 
+    #   }.should change(roster, :count)
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     team.add_player(player) 
+    #   }.should change(roster, :count).by(1)
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     team.add_player(player) 
+    #   }.should change(roster, :count).by_at_least(1)
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     team.add_player(player)
+    #   }.should change(roster, :count).by_at_most(1)    
+    #
+    #   string = "string"
+    #   lambda {
+    #     string.reverse!
+    #   }.should change { string }.from("string").to("gnirts")
+    #
+    #   lambda {
+    #     person.happy_birthday
+    #   }.should change(person, :birthday).from(32).to(33)
+    #       
+    #   lambda {
+    #     employee.develop_great_new_social_networking_app
+    #   }.should change(employee, :title).from("Mail Clerk").to("CEO")
+    #
+    # Evaluates <tt>receiver.message</tt> or <tt>block</tt> before and after
+    # it evaluates the c object (generated by the lambdas in the examples
+    # above).
+    #
+    # Then compares the values before and after the <tt>receiver.message</tt>
+    # and evaluates the difference compared to the expected difference.
+    #
+    # == WARNING
+    # <tt>should_not change</tt> only supports the form with no
+    # subsequent calls to <tt>by</tt>, <tt>by_at_least</tt>,
+    # <tt>by_at_most</tt>, <tt>to</tt> or <tt>from</tt>.
+    #
+    # blocks passed to <tt>should</tt> <tt>change</tt> and <tt>should_not</tt>
+    # <tt>change</tt> must use the <tt>{}</tt> form (<tt>do/end</tt> is not
+    # supported).
+    #
+    def change(receiver=nil, message=nil, &block)
+      Matchers::Change.new(receiver, message, &block)
+    end
+  end
+end

data/lib/spec/matchers/eql.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+  
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should eql(expected)
+    #   should_not eql(expected)
+    #
+    # Passes if actual and expected are of equal value, but not necessarily the same object.
+    #
+    # See http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.html#M001057 for more information about equality in Ruby.
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   5.should eql(5)
+    #   5.should_not eql(3)
+    def eql(expected)
+      simple_matcher do |actual, matcher|
+        matcher.failure_message          = "expected #{expected.inspect}, got #{actual.inspect} (using .eql?)", expected, actual
+        matcher.negative_failure_message = "expected #{actual.inspect} not to equal #{expected.inspect} (using .eql?)", expected, actual
+        matcher.description              = "eql #{expected.inspect}"
+        actual.eql?(expected)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/lib/spec/matchers/equal.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+  
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should equal(expected)
+    #   should_not equal(expected)
+    #
+    # Passes if actual and expected are the same object (object identity).
+    #
+    # See http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.html#M001057 for more information about equality in Ruby.
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   5.should equal(5) #Fixnums are equal
+    #   "5".should_not equal("5") #Strings that look the same are not the same object
+    def equal(expected)
+      simple_matcher do |actual, matcher|
+        matcher.failure_message          = "expected #{expected.inspect}, got #{actual.inspect} (using .equal?)", expected, actual
+        matcher.negative_failure_message = "expected #{actual.inspect} not to equal #{expected.inspect} (using .equal?)", expected, actual
+        matcher.description              = "equal #{expected.inspect}"
+        actual.equal?(expected)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/lib/spec/matchers/errors.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    class MatcherError < StandardError; end
+  end
+end

data/lib/spec/matchers/exist.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should exist
+    #   should_not exist
+    #
+    # Passes if actual.exist?
+    def exist
+      simple_matcher do |actual, matcher|
+        matcher.failure_message = "expected #{actual.inspect} to exist, but it doesn't."
+        matcher.negative_failure_message = "expected #{actual.inspect} to not exist, but it does."
+        actual.exist?
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/lib/spec/matchers/generated_descriptions.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    def self.last_matcher
+      @last_matcher
+    end
+
+    def self.last_matcher=(last_matcher)
+      @last_matcher = last_matcher
+    end
+
+    def self.last_should
+      @last_should
+    end
+
+    def self.last_should=(last_should)
+      @last_should = last_should
+    end
+
+    def self.clear_generated_description
+      self.last_matcher = nil
+      self.last_should = nil
+    end
+
+    def self.generated_description
+      return nil if last_should.nil?
+      "#{last_should.to_s.gsub('_',' ')} #{last_description}"
+    end
+    
+    private
+    
+    def self.last_description
+      last_matcher.respond_to?(:description) ? last_matcher.description : <<-MESSAGE
+When you call a matcher in an example without a String, like this:
+
+specify { object.should matcher }
+
+or this:
+
+it { should matcher }
+
+the runner expects the matcher to have a #describe method. You should either
+add a String to the example this matcher is being used in, or give it a
+description method. Then you won't have to suffer this lengthy warning again.
+MESSAGE
+    end
+  end
+end
+      

data/lib/spec/matchers/has.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    def has(sym, *args) # :nodoc:
+      simple_matcher do |actual, matcher|
+        def matcher.predicate(sym)
+          "#{sym.to_s.sub("have_","has_")}?".to_sym
+        end
+        matcher.failure_message          = "expected ##{matcher.predicate(sym)}(#{args[0].inspect}) to return true, got false"
+        matcher.negative_failure_message = "expected ##{matcher.predicate(sym)}(#{args[0].inspect}) to return false, got true"
+        matcher.description              = "have key #{args[0].inspect}"
+        actual.__send__(matcher.predicate(sym), *args)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

data/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+module Spec
+  module Matchers
+    class Have #:nodoc:
+      def initialize(expected, relativity=:exactly)
+        @expected = (expected == :no ? 0 : expected)
+        @relativity = relativity
+      end
+    
+      def relativities
+        @relativities ||= {
+          :exactly => "",
+          :at_least => "at least ",
+          :at_most => "at most "
+        }
+      end
+    
+      def matches?(collection_owner)
+        if collection_owner.respond_to?(@collection_name)
+          collection = collection_owner.__send__(@collection_name, *@args, &@block)
+        elsif (@plural_collection_name && collection_owner.respond_to?(@plural_collection_name))
+          collection = collection_owner.__send__(@plural_collection_name, *@args, &@block)
+        elsif (collection_owner.respond_to?(:length) || collection_owner.respond_to?(:size))
+          collection = collection_owner
+        else
+          collection_owner.__send__(@collection_name, *@args, &@block)
+        end
+        @given = collection.size if collection.respond_to?(:size)
+        @given = collection.length if collection.respond_to?(:length)
+        raise not_a_collection if @given.nil?
+        return @given >= @expected if @relativity == :at_least
+        return @given <= @expected if @relativity == :at_most
+        return @given == @expected
+      end
+      
+      def not_a_collection
+        "expected #{@collection_name} to be a collection but it does not respond to #length or #size"
+      end
+    
+      def failure_message
+        "expected #{relative_expectation} #{@collection_name}, got #{@given}"
+      end
+
+      def negative_failure_message
+        if @relativity == :exactly
+          return "expected target not to have #{@expected} #{@collection_name}, got #{@given}"
+        elsif @relativity == :at_most
+          return <<-EOF
+Isn't life confusing enough?
+Instead of having to figure out the meaning of this:
+  should_not have_at_most(#{@expected}).#{@collection_name}
+We recommend that you use this instead:
+  should have_at_least(#{@expected + 1}).#{@collection_name}
+EOF
+        elsif @relativity == :at_least
+          return <<-EOF
+Isn't life confusing enough?
+Instead of having to figure out the meaning of this:
+  should_not have_at_least(#{@expected}).#{@collection_name}
+We recommend that you use this instead:
+  should have_at_most(#{@expected - 1}).#{@collection_name}
+EOF
+        end
+      end
+      
+      def description
+        "have #{relative_expectation} #{@collection_name}"
+      end
+      
+      def respond_to?(sym)
+        @expected.respond_to?(sym) || super
+      end
+    
+      private
+      
+      def method_missing(sym, *args, &block)
+        @collection_name = sym
+        if inflector = (defined?(ActiveSupport::Inflector) ? ActiveSupport::Inflector : (defined?(Inflector) ? Inflector : nil))
+          @plural_collection_name = inflector.pluralize(sym.to_s)
+        end
+        @args = args
+        @block = block
+        self
+      end
+      
+      def relative_expectation
+        "#{relativities[@relativity]}#{@expected}"
+      end
+    end
+
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should have(number).named_collection__or__sugar
+    #   should_not have(number).named_collection__or__sugar
+    #
+    # Passes if receiver is a collection with the submitted
+    # number of items OR if the receiver OWNS a collection
+    # with the submitted number of items.
+    #
+    # If the receiver OWNS the collection, you must use the name
+    # of the collection. So if a <tt>Team</tt> instance has a
+    # collection named <tt>#players</tt>, you must use that name
+    # to set the expectation.
+    #
+    # If the receiver IS the collection, you can use any name
+    # you like for <tt>named_collection</tt>. We'd recommend using
+    # either "elements", "members", or "items" as these are all
+    # standard ways of describing the things IN a collection.
+    #
+    # This also works for Strings, letting you set an expectation
+    # about its length
+    #
+    # == Examples
+    #
+    #   # Passes if team.players.size == 11
+    #   team.should have(11).players
+    #
+    #   # Passes if [1,2,3].length == 3
+    #   [1,2,3].should have(3).items #"items" is pure sugar
+    #
+    #   # Passes if "this string".length == 11
+    #   "this string".should have(11).characters #"characters" is pure sugar
+    def have(n)
+      Matchers::Have.new(n)
+    end
+    alias :have_exactly :have
+
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should have_at_least(number).items
+    #
+    # Exactly like have() with >=.
+    #
+    # == Warning
+    #
+    # +should_not+ +have_at_least+ is not supported
+    def have_at_least(n)
+      Matchers::Have.new(n, :at_least)
+    end
+
+    # :call-seq:
+    #   should have_at_most(number).items
+    #
+    # Exactly like have() with <=.
+    #
+    # == Warning
+    #
+    # +should_not+ +have_at_most+ is not supported
+    def have_at_most(n)
+      Matchers::Have.new(n, :at_most)
+    end
+  end
+end