namo 0.25.1 → 0.26.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
checksums.yaml CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  ---
2
2
  SHA256:
3
- metadata.gz: fd20f662edb4f305d6c74b5a100c536c20ad57ce31f7044498f76eebe2fbbf68
4
- data.tar.gz: e242043273cac5866c8dda07aec202c69954d36072f8092b50bb817b6ca24bb8
3
+ metadata.gz: 326ba6ba610149b0998452136812f313617014d5e68fc066d5c81ace134ad8eb
4
+ data.tar.gz: ddd93f8e3866169c6bc6835c5720375fbfd53860b2e036f1540dcb567414b61c
5
5
  SHA512:
6
- metadata.gz: 581cbeae8e0eeca1fb35db857d2acad566ecd21dc8d967e921161620b6a994e26293b17026e806c0c754851fe8da175bf3e260afe98e8f2899853fcb1e20fda3
7
- data.tar.gz: cdc1687745394bf2931469daf7823d0c724436aea4a0c4657505f39beae1afe8a6224406682f9d630672a12fc6554b9872044ee8d72d93acfd03d7459bb32282
6
+ metadata.gz: 9402c8b7193dd068d624b883f9e2b7492942cf67dcf0c3d697e85bb77c2615deb205538cf86c5b341e567e25990241235b88bd5bfa0582b0cace025c65a7fa10
7
+ data.tar.gz: 40af6d9dd32c57b4a60e038887fbc4c73c7a6412e25854688b9ff8ddc5ee35c6419d30fcb76ce6e0ee5cdcf491c757a3ebcd1f81ec584ad41243413300b8c40f
data/CHANGELOG CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,18 @@
1
1
  # CHANGELOG
2
2
 
3
+ ## 20260704
4
+
5
+ 0.26.0: + Namo#detach, Namo::Formulae#detach — remove a formula by name or a formulary's methods by module, completing the attach/attach!/detach family.
6
+
7
+ detach becomes the sanctioned formula-removal idiom, displacing the namo.formulae.delete(:name) reach-through. It is by-name with no provenance (the store is a snapshot): the Module arm removes whatever currently holds each of the module's method names. There is no detach! (removing a formula can't collide with data, so no guard to force through) and no removal operator (<< appends; per the 0.14.0 principle, no >>).
8
+
9
+ 1. + Namo::Formulae#detach(constituent) — dispatches a Symbol to @store.delete(constituent); a Module to deleting each of its public_instance_methods(false) names, after the same Namo::Formulary marker guard attach uses (an untagged module raises ArgumentError); anything else raises TypeError naming the class, in the << else-arm's style. Returns self. Placed directly after attach/<<. Formulae#delete is unchanged — it stays the store-level primitive detach sits on.
10
+ 2. + Namo#detach(constituent) — forwards to @formulae.detach and returns self, placed with the attach family (after attach!, before <<). No guard at the Namo level: there is no data-side interaction, so the Formulae worker owns the dispatch and the raises. Collection inherits detach harmlessly.
11
+ 3. ~ test/Namo/Formulae_test.rb: + a "#detach" describe in the formulary tier — both arms return self; the Symbol arm removes the named formula and no-ops on an absent name; the Module arm removes exactly the formulary's method names, leaves a []= name it doesn't contribute, and deletes a []= overwrite occupying a formulary-method name (the by-name/no-provenance pin); ArgumentError on an untagged module; TypeError on a String and a Hash naming the class; chaining removes both. ~ test/namo_test.rb: + a "#detach" describe under formularies — returns the Namo; removes a []= formula from the queryable namespace (derived_dimensions drops it, values returns one nil per row); leaves other formulae resolving; the Module arm empties derived_dimensions; a data dimension is a no-op (the column survives); an absent name no-ops returning the Namo; TypeError on a non-Symbol non-Module and ArgumentError on an untagged module; the #dimensions "reflects mutation" test migrates sales.formulae.delete(:revenue) to sales.detach(:revenue). ~ test/Namo/Collection_test.rb: + a "#detach" describe pinning that a Collection inherits detach — a formulary attached to the collection detaches, so the detail rows no longer resolve its name.
12
+ 4. ~ README.md: + a "Removing a formula" note under Formulae (detach removes a formula, returns the Namo, chains, no-ops on an absent name; complements contraction across the data/derived and algebra/mutation splits; never touches @data); + a detach(Module) note in the Formularies section (the reverse of attach, by-name with no provenance, raises on an untagged module, the attach/attach!/detach family, no << removal counterpart, no detach!).
13
+ 5. ~ ROADMAP.md: + the 0.26.0 release entry recording the settled decisions (by-name/no-provenance, marker required, loose-on-absent, derived-side-only, no-bang, no-operator, single-argument/chaining, untouched-host-ancestry); current-state bumped to 0.26.0; detach folded into the Summary's formulary vocabulary and the 1.0.0 feature list.
14
+ 6. ~ Namo::VERSION: /0.25.1/0.26.0/
15
+
3
16
  ## 20260703
4
17
 
5
18
  0.25.1: Fix documentation and reformat CHANGELOG to use Markdown headers.
data/README.md CHANGED
@@ -716,6 +716,12 @@ prices[:sma_close_20] = proc{|row| row[:sma, :close, 20]}
716
716
  prices[:date, :sma_close_20] # materialises per the usual projection rule
717
717
  ```
718
718
 
719
+ #### Removing a formula
720
+
721
+ `detach(:name)` removes a formula, returns the Namo, and chains — `sales.detach(:revenue).detach(:cost)`. Detaching a name that isn't there is a quiet no-op, so a cleanup step composes over any Namo without first checking whether the formula is present. It is the sanctioned way to drop a derived dimension, sitting over the store-level primitive `formulae.delete`.
722
+
723
+ `detach` and contraction are complements across two axes. Contraction (`sales[-:price]`) is non-mutating — it returns a *new* Namo with a *data* dimension removed and the formulae carried. `detach` mutates the receiver and removes a *derived* dimension. So the pair spans both the data/derived split and the algebra/mutation split: contraction is algebra over data, `detach` is mutation of the derived side. `detach` never touches `@data` — naming a data dimension is a no-op and the column survives; removing a data dimension is contraction's job.
724
+
719
725
  #### Formularies
720
726
 
721
727
  A *formulary* is a reusable body of derived dimensions — a module whose public instance methods are formulae. A Namo attaches a formulary, and from then on those methods resolve as derived dimensions through the same interface as `[]=` formulae. The methods take `row` (and `namo`, and any further parameters) exactly as a `[]=` formula does:
@@ -772,6 +778,8 @@ Because each method is copied into the store, the rules already governing `[]=`
772
778
 
773
779
  Note that there is no counterpart in `[]=`'s scalar-over-formula eviction and is worth naming: a formulary method that reads a column its own name evicts will **recurse** on access. The eviction removes the datum, and exclusive storage leaves no shadowed value behind the formula, so `Row#[]` re-enters the formula rather than falling back to data — a `def close(row); row[:close] * ...; end` attached with `attach!` over a `:close` data column has no `:close` data left to read. `[]=` rarely bites this way because you write the proc at the call site, beside the name it replaces; a formulary is authored elsewhere, so a method reading its own evicted column is easy to attach without noticing. Self-reference is unguarded here as everywhere in the formula mechanism — keep a formulary's inputs and outputs under distinct names, or `attach` (not `attach!`) and contract deliberately.
774
780
 
781
+ `detach(OrderFlow)` is the reverse of `attach`: it removes the formulary's public method names from the store, so `flows.attach(OrderFlow)` then `flows.detach(OrderFlow)` leaves the formulae as they started. It works by name and keeps no provenance — the store is a snapshot, so `detach` removes *whatever currently holds each name*, including a `[]=` formula that later overwrote a formulary method of the same name. Like the `attach` side, the marker is required: `detach` raises `ArgumentError` for an untagged module, so you can only detach what could have been attached. The mutating family is `attach` / `attach!` / `detach`; `<<` has no removal counterpart (it *appends* constituents — a removal operator would be cuteness over clarity), and there is no `detach!` because removing a formula can't collide with data, so there is no guard for a bang to force through.
782
+
775
783
  Two Namos that expose the same names — one via `[]=`, one via a formulary — are `===`; a Namo with a formulary attached is not `===` to a vanilla Namo of the same data dimensions.
776
784
 
777
785
  Formulary methods take `row` explicitly and index it (`row[:buys]`), the same as `[]=` formulae. Resolving bare names inside a method body (`buys` for `row[:buys]`) and memoising derived values on a frozen Namo arrive in a later release; until then a formulary method is a plain function of its `row` (and `namo`).
data/lib/Namo/Formulae.rb CHANGED
@@ -25,6 +25,21 @@ class Namo
25
25
  end
26
26
  alias_method :<<, :attach
27
27
 
28
+ def detach(constituent)
29
+ case constituent
30
+ when Symbol
31
+ @store.delete(constituent)
32
+ when Module
33
+ unless constituent.include?(Namo::Formulary)
34
+ raise ArgumentError, "not a Namo::Formulary: #{constituent}"
35
+ end
36
+ constituent.public_instance_methods(false).each{|name| @store.delete(name)}
37
+ else
38
+ raise TypeError, "can't detach #{constituent.class} from a Formulae; expected a Symbol or a Module (formulary)"
39
+ end
40
+ self
41
+ end
42
+
28
43
  def derive(name, row, namo, *arguments)
29
44
  formula = self[name]
30
45
  if collection_scoped?(name)
data/lib/Namo/VERSION.rb CHANGED
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
2
2
  # Namo::VERSION
3
3
 
4
4
  class Namo
5
- VERSION = '0.25.1'
5
+ VERSION = '0.26.0'
6
6
  end
data/lib/namo.rb CHANGED
@@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ class Namo
103
103
  self
104
104
  end
105
105
 
106
+ def detach(constituent)
107
+ @formulae.detach(constituent)
108
+ self
109
+ end
110
+
106
111
  def <<(constituent)
107
112
  case constituent
108
113
  when Module then attach(constituent)
@@ -145,6 +145,15 @@ describe Namo::Collection do
145
145
  end
146
146
  end
147
147
 
148
+ describe "#detach" do
149
+ it "detaches a formulary attached to the collection, so the detail rows no longer resolve its name" do
150
+ collection << component_pricing
151
+ _(collection.values(:cost_per_kg)).must_equal [250, 250, 200, 250]
152
+ collection.detach(component_pricing)
153
+ _(collection.derived_dimensions).wont_include :cost_per_kg
154
+ end
155
+ end
156
+
148
157
  describe "#find" do
149
158
  it "returns the member with the given name" do
150
159
  _(collection.find(:chassis)).must_be_same_as chassis
@@ -330,6 +330,64 @@ describe Namo::Formulae do
330
330
  end
331
331
  end
332
332
 
333
+ describe "#detach" do
334
+ it "returns self for a Symbol" do
335
+ _(attached.detach(:signed_volume)).must_be_same_as attached
336
+ end
337
+
338
+ it "returns self for a Module" do
339
+ _(attached.detach(delta)).must_be_same_as attached
340
+ end
341
+
342
+ it "removes the named formula, leaving the others" do
343
+ attached.detach(:signed_volume)
344
+ _(attached.key?(:signed_volume)).must_equal false
345
+ _(attached.key?(:echo_namo)).must_equal true
346
+ end
347
+
348
+ it "is a no-op on an absent name, still returning self" do
349
+ _(attached.detach(:missing)).must_be_same_as attached
350
+ _(attached.key?(:signed_volume)).must_equal true
351
+ end
352
+
353
+ it "removes exactly the formulary's public method names via the Module arm" do
354
+ attached.detach(delta)
355
+ _(attached.keys).must_equal []
356
+ end
357
+
358
+ it "leaves a []= formula not among the formulary's methods when detaching the module" do
359
+ attached[:extra] = proc{|r| 0}
360
+ attached.detach(delta)
361
+ _(attached.key?(:extra)).must_equal true
362
+ end
363
+
364
+ it "deletes a []= overwrite occupying a formulary-method name" do
365
+ attached[:signed_volume] = proc{|r| 0}
366
+ attached.detach(delta)
367
+ _(attached.key?(:signed_volume)).must_equal false
368
+ end
369
+
370
+ it "raises ArgumentError for an untagged module" do
371
+ _(proc{attached.detach(untagged)}).must_raise ArgumentError
372
+ end
373
+
374
+ it "raises TypeError for a String, naming the class" do
375
+ error = _(proc{attached.detach("signed_volume")}).must_raise TypeError
376
+ _(error.message).must_match(/String/)
377
+ end
378
+
379
+ it "raises TypeError for a Hash, naming the class" do
380
+ error = _(proc{attached.detach({})}).must_raise TypeError
381
+ _(error.message).must_match(/Hash/)
382
+ end
383
+
384
+ it "chains, removing both named formulae" do
385
+ formulae[:cost] = cost
386
+ formulae.detach(:revenue).detach(:cost)
387
+ _(formulae.keys).must_equal []
388
+ end
389
+ end
390
+
333
391
  describe "carry-through" do
334
392
  it "preserves attached formularies through #dup" do
335
393
  _(attached.dup.keys).must_include :signed_volume
data/test/namo_test.rb CHANGED
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ describe Namo do
165
165
  it "reflects mutation on the next call" do
166
166
  sales[:revenue] = proc{|r| r[:price] * r[:quantity]}
167
167
  _(sales.dimensions).must_include :revenue
168
- sales.formulae.delete(:revenue)
168
+ sales.detach(:revenue)
169
169
  _(sales.dimensions).wont_include :revenue
170
170
  end
171
171
  end
@@ -978,6 +978,56 @@ describe Namo do
978
978
  _(flows === other).must_equal true
979
979
  end
980
980
  end
981
+
982
+ describe "#detach" do
983
+ it "returns the Namo" do
984
+ _(flows.detach(:signed_volume)).must_be_same_as flows
985
+ end
986
+
987
+ it "removes a formula from the queryable namespace" do
988
+ namo = Namo.new(flow_data)
989
+ namo[:revenue] = proc{|r| r[:buys]}
990
+ namo.detach(:revenue)
991
+ _(namo.derived_dimensions).wont_include :revenue
992
+ _(namo.values(:revenue)).must_equal [nil, nil, nil]
993
+ end
994
+
995
+ it "leaves other formulae resolving" do
996
+ namo = Namo.new(flow_data)
997
+ namo[:revenue] = proc{|r| r[:buys]}
998
+ namo[:tally] = proc{|r| r[:sells]}
999
+ namo.detach(:revenue)
1000
+ _(namo.values(:tally)).must_equal [40, 120, 75]
1001
+ end
1002
+
1003
+ it "removes an attached formulary's methods via the Module arm" do
1004
+ flows.detach(delta)
1005
+ _(flows.derived_dimensions).must_equal []
1006
+ end
1007
+
1008
+ it "never exposed the formulary's private helper" do
1009
+ _(flows.derived_dimensions).wont_include :helper
1010
+ end
1011
+
1012
+ it "never touches data — a data dimension is a no-op" do
1013
+ flows.detach(:date)
1014
+ _(flows.data_dimensions).must_include :date
1015
+ _(flows.values(:date)).must_equal [1, 2, 3]
1016
+ end
1017
+
1018
+ it "is a no-op on an absent name, returning the Namo" do
1019
+ _(flows.detach(:missing)).must_be_same_as flows
1020
+ _(flows.values(:signed_volume)).must_equal [20, -40, 0]
1021
+ end
1022
+
1023
+ it "raises TypeError on a non-Symbol non-Module" do
1024
+ _(proc{flows.detach("signed_volume")}).must_raise TypeError
1025
+ end
1026
+
1027
+ it "raises ArgumentError on an untagged module" do
1028
+ _(proc{flows.detach(untagged)}).must_raise ArgumentError
1029
+ end
1030
+ end
981
1031
  end
982
1032
 
983
1033
  describe "formularies via class include" do
metadata CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  --- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification
2
2
  name: namo
3
3
  version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version
4
- version: 0.25.1
4
+ version: 0.26.0
5
5
  platform: ruby
6
6
  authors:
7
7
  - thoran