msfl 1.1.0 → 1.1.1
Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
- checksums.yaml +4 -4
- data/lib/msfl/converters/operator.rb +59 -28
- data/lib/msfl/validators/definitions/hash_key.rb +20 -2
- data/msfl.gemspec +1 -1
- data/spec/msfl/converters/operator_spec.rb +61 -0
- metadata +1 -1
checksums.yaml
CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
2
2
|
SHA1:
|
3
|
-
metadata.gz:
|
4
|
-
data.tar.gz:
|
3
|
+
metadata.gz: 8b2132d5eaec0ac5b4a2055174d6f40685580f40
|
4
|
+
data.tar.gz: 0ff98ee3c34b4225a43c8e9433b0c08b87e2521f
|
5
5
|
SHA512:
|
6
|
-
metadata.gz:
|
7
|
-
data.tar.gz:
|
6
|
+
metadata.gz: cdacb790d452b5343363f7b8e420f4a37aabd3e5e16f2005031545f79389c06f528c42601ef8f537350a993cfce5b1af745b5607142c041af50df784930091ba
|
7
|
+
data.tar.gz: 5c429cf64452914f271a8ad7513627e009c1d8ea33c1a5f9768277df9f2c660f62c02615a4823bb434fed98c1c9478383e8337495646b8f93579390cc54f8fd0
|
@@ -49,22 +49,28 @@ module MSFL
|
|
49
49
|
def implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively(obj, parent_key = nil)
|
50
50
|
if obj.is_a? Hash
|
51
51
|
first_key = obj.keys.first
|
52
|
-
if
|
53
|
-
|
54
|
-
|
55
|
-
|
56
|
-
raise ArgumentError, "#implicit_and_to_explicit requires that parent_key be specified when converting operators" if parent_key.nil?
|
57
|
-
# parent key is non nil
|
58
|
-
and_array = []
|
59
|
-
obj.each do |k, v|
|
60
|
-
and_array << { parent_key => { k => implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively(v, k) } }
|
61
|
-
end
|
52
|
+
if binary_operators.include?(first_key)
|
53
|
+
result = i_to_e_bin_op obj, parent_key
|
54
|
+
elsif logical_operators.include?(first_key)
|
55
|
+
result = i_to_e_log_op obj, parent_key
|
62
56
|
else
|
63
57
|
# the first key is not an operator
|
64
58
|
# if there is only one key just assign the result of calling this method recursively on the value to the result for the key
|
65
59
|
if obj.keys.count == 1
|
66
60
|
if obj[first_key].is_a?(Hash)
|
67
61
|
result = implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively obj[first_key], first_key
|
62
|
+
elsif obj[first_key].is_a? MSFL::Types::Set
|
63
|
+
# This situation occurs when there are nested logical operators
|
64
|
+
# obj is a hash, with one key that is not a binary operator which has a value that is a MSFL::Types::Set
|
65
|
+
result = { }
|
66
|
+
and_array = MSFL::Types::Set.new
|
67
|
+
obj[first_key].each do |v|
|
68
|
+
# byebug
|
69
|
+
and_array << implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively(v)
|
70
|
+
end
|
71
|
+
result[first_key] = and_array
|
72
|
+
elsif obj[first_key].is_a? Array
|
73
|
+
raise ArgumentError, "#implicit_and_to_explicit requires that it does not contain any Arrays - its argument should preprocessed by .arrays_to_sets and .convert_keys_to_symbols"
|
68
74
|
end
|
69
75
|
else
|
70
76
|
raise ArgumentError, "#implicit_and_to_explicit requires that all or none of a hash's keys be operators" if any_operators?(obj.keys)
|
@@ -77,14 +83,11 @@ module MSFL
|
|
77
83
|
and_array << { k => v }
|
78
84
|
end
|
79
85
|
end
|
86
|
+
result = { and: MSFL::Types::Set.new(and_array) }
|
80
87
|
end
|
81
88
|
end
|
82
|
-
result ||= { and: MSFL::Types::Set.new(and_array) }
|
83
89
|
elsif obj.is_a? MSFL::Types::Set
|
84
|
-
result =
|
85
|
-
obj.each do |v|
|
86
|
-
result << implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively(v)
|
87
|
-
end
|
90
|
+
result = i_to_e_set obj, parent_key
|
88
91
|
elsif obj.is_a? Array
|
89
92
|
raise ArgumentError, "#implicit_and_to_explicit requires that it does not contain any Arrays - its argument should preprocessed by .arrays_to_sets and .convert_keys_to_symbols"
|
90
93
|
end
|
@@ -92,23 +95,51 @@ module MSFL
|
|
92
95
|
end
|
93
96
|
|
94
97
|
private
|
95
|
-
#
|
96
|
-
def
|
97
|
-
|
98
|
-
|
99
|
-
|
100
|
-
|
101
|
-
|
98
|
+
# Recursively handle a hash containing keys that are all logical operators
|
99
|
+
def i_to_e_log_op(hash, parent_key = nil)
|
100
|
+
raise ArgumentError, "#implicit_and_to_explicit requires that all or none of a hash's keys be logical operators" unless all_logical_operators?(hash.keys)
|
101
|
+
result = {}
|
102
|
+
hash.each do |key, value|
|
103
|
+
result[key] = implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively value
|
104
|
+
end
|
105
|
+
result
|
106
|
+
end
|
107
|
+
|
108
|
+
# Recursively handle a hash containing keys that are all binary operators
|
109
|
+
def i_to_e_bin_op(hash, parent_key = nil)
|
110
|
+
# the first key an operator
|
111
|
+
raise ArgumentError, "#implicit_and_to_explicit requires that all or none of a hash's keys be operators" unless all_operators?(hash.keys)
|
112
|
+
# all keys are operators
|
113
|
+
|
114
|
+
first_key = hash.keys.first
|
115
|
+
if hash.keys.count == 1
|
116
|
+
# There's only one key so there cannot be an implied AND at this level
|
117
|
+
if parent_key && (! binary_operators.include?(parent_key)) # this needs more testing - I'm not entirely sure if I should check for this esoteric case of immediately nested explicit ANDs inside of an implied AND
|
118
|
+
# The parent_key argument was provided which means that the caller expects the result to be a hash of at least two levels
|
119
|
+
# where the first level has a key of the parent_key with a value of a hash
|
120
|
+
# first_key is passed in the recursive call
|
121
|
+
{ parent_key => { first_key => implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively(hash[first_key], first_key)}}
|
122
|
+
else
|
123
|
+
{ first_key => implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively(hash[first_key]) }
|
102
124
|
end
|
125
|
+
|
126
|
+
else
|
127
|
+
raise ArgumentError, "#implicit_and_to_explicit requires that parent_key be specified when converting operators" if parent_key.nil?
|
128
|
+
# parent key is non nil
|
129
|
+
and_array = []
|
130
|
+
hash.each do |k, v|
|
131
|
+
and_array << { parent_key => { k => implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively(v, k) } }
|
132
|
+
end
|
133
|
+
{ and: MSFL::Types::Set.new(and_array) }
|
103
134
|
end
|
104
|
-
{ and: MSFL::Types::Set.new(and_array) }
|
105
135
|
end
|
106
136
|
|
107
|
-
|
108
|
-
|
109
|
-
|
110
|
-
|
111
|
-
|
137
|
+
def i_to_e_set(set, parent_key = nil)
|
138
|
+
result = MSFL::Types::Set.new
|
139
|
+
set.each do |v|
|
140
|
+
result << implicit_and_to_explicit_recursively(v)
|
141
|
+
end
|
142
|
+
result
|
112
143
|
end
|
113
144
|
end
|
114
145
|
end
|
@@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ module MSFL
|
|
13
13
|
|
14
14
|
# Operators still needing parsing: ellipsis2, tilda
|
15
15
|
def hash_key_operators
|
16
|
+
binary_operators.concat(logical_operators)
|
17
|
+
end
|
18
|
+
|
19
|
+
def binary_operators
|
16
20
|
[
|
17
|
-
:and, # logical AND
|
18
|
-
:or, # logical OR
|
19
21
|
:in, # IN
|
20
22
|
:between, # inclusive range for integers, dates, and date times
|
21
23
|
:start, # a range bound inclusively to the left
|
@@ -31,6 +33,10 @@ module MSFL
|
|
31
33
|
]
|
32
34
|
end
|
33
35
|
|
36
|
+
def logical_operators
|
37
|
+
[:and, :or]
|
38
|
+
end
|
39
|
+
|
34
40
|
# Returns true if all elements of arr are operators, false otherwise
|
35
41
|
#
|
36
42
|
# @param arr [Array<Symbol>] the Array of Symbols to be checked against the operators list
|
@@ -42,6 +48,18 @@ module MSFL
|
|
42
48
|
true
|
43
49
|
end
|
44
50
|
|
51
|
+
|
52
|
+
# Returns true if all elements of arr are logical operators, false otherwise
|
53
|
+
#
|
54
|
+
# @param arr [Array<Symbol>] and array of symbols to check to see if all elements are logical operators
|
55
|
+
# @return [Bool] it is true if all the elements are logical operators, otherwise false
|
56
|
+
def all_logical_operators?(arr)
|
57
|
+
arr.each do |e|
|
58
|
+
return false unless logical_operators.include?(e)
|
59
|
+
end
|
60
|
+
true
|
61
|
+
end
|
62
|
+
|
45
63
|
# Returns true if any of the elements in arr are operators, otherwise false
|
46
64
|
#
|
47
65
|
# @param arr [Array] the array of elements to check for the presence of operators
|
data/msfl.gemspec
CHANGED
@@ -12,6 +12,40 @@ describe "MSFL::Converters::Operator" do
|
|
12
12
|
|
13
13
|
let(:expected) { raise ArgumentError, "You are expected to define the expected value" }
|
14
14
|
|
15
|
+
context "when there is not an implicit AND" do
|
16
|
+
|
17
|
+
let(:expected) { arg }
|
18
|
+
|
19
|
+
context "when the arg is a scalar" do
|
20
|
+
|
21
|
+
let(:arg) { 50 }
|
22
|
+
|
23
|
+
it "is the arg unchanged" do
|
24
|
+
expect(mut).to eq expected
|
25
|
+
end
|
26
|
+
end
|
27
|
+
|
28
|
+
context "when the arg is single level" do
|
29
|
+
|
30
|
+
let(:arg) { { gte: 1000 } }
|
31
|
+
|
32
|
+
it "is the arg unchanged" do
|
33
|
+
expect(mut).to eq expected
|
34
|
+
end
|
35
|
+
end
|
36
|
+
|
37
|
+
context "when the arg is multi level" do
|
38
|
+
|
39
|
+
let(:arg) { { value: { gte: 1000 } } }
|
40
|
+
|
41
|
+
it "is the arg unchanged" do
|
42
|
+
expect(mut).to eq expected
|
43
|
+
end
|
44
|
+
end
|
45
|
+
|
46
|
+
|
47
|
+
end
|
48
|
+
|
15
49
|
context "when the implicit AND exists on a Hash whose keys are fields" do
|
16
50
|
|
17
51
|
# TYPE 1 --- { make: "chevy", year: 2010 } => { and: [ { make: "chevy" }, { year: 2010 }] }
|
@@ -64,6 +98,33 @@ describe "MSFL::Converters::Operator" do
|
|
64
98
|
end
|
65
99
|
end
|
66
100
|
end
|
101
|
+
|
102
|
+
context "when the implicit AND is within a MSFL::Types::Set" do
|
103
|
+
|
104
|
+
let(:arg) do
|
105
|
+
{ and: MSFL::Types::Set.new([
|
106
|
+
{ make: "chevy", year: { gte: 2010, lte: 2012 } },
|
107
|
+
{ value: { gte: 1000 } }
|
108
|
+
])}
|
109
|
+
end
|
110
|
+
|
111
|
+
let(:expected) do
|
112
|
+
{ and: MSFL::Types::Set.new([
|
113
|
+
{ and: MSFL::Types::Set.new([
|
114
|
+
{ make: "chevy" },
|
115
|
+
{ and: MSFL::Types::Set.new([
|
116
|
+
{ year: { gte: 2010 } },
|
117
|
+
{ year: { lte: 2012 } }
|
118
|
+
])}
|
119
|
+
])},
|
120
|
+
{ value: { gte: 1000 } }
|
121
|
+
])}
|
122
|
+
end
|
123
|
+
|
124
|
+
it "converts all of the implicit ANDs" do
|
125
|
+
expect(mut).to eq expected
|
126
|
+
end
|
127
|
+
end
|
67
128
|
end
|
68
129
|
|
69
130
|
describe "#between_to_gte_lte_recursively" do
|