minitest-ok 0.1.0
Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
- checksums.yaml +7 -0
- data/MIT-LICENSE +21 -0
- data/README.md +143 -0
- data/Rakefile +57 -0
- data/lib/minitest/ok.rb +676 -0
- data/test/minitest/ok_test.rb +878 -0
- data/test/test_helper.rb +12 -0
- metadata +71 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,878 @@
|
|
1
|
+
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
###
|
4
|
+
### $Release: 0.1.0 $
|
5
|
+
### $Copyright: copyright(c) 2015 kuwata-lab.com all rights reserved $
|
6
|
+
### $License: MIT License $
|
7
|
+
###
|
8
|
+
|
9
|
+
|
10
|
+
require_relative '../test_helper'
|
11
|
+
|
12
|
+
|
13
|
+
describe Minitest::Ok::AssertionObject do
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
def should_not_raise
|
16
|
+
begin
|
17
|
+
yield
|
18
|
+
rescue Exception => ex
|
19
|
+
assert false, "Nothing should not be raised, but #{ex.class} raised.\n[Message] #{ex}"
|
20
|
+
end
|
21
|
+
end
|
22
|
+
|
23
|
+
def should_raise
|
24
|
+
begin
|
25
|
+
yield
|
26
|
+
rescue Minitest::Assertion => ex
|
27
|
+
return ex
|
28
|
+
else
|
29
|
+
assert false, "Assertion should be raised, but nothing raised."
|
30
|
+
end
|
31
|
+
end
|
32
|
+
|
33
|
+
|
34
|
+
describe '#==' do
|
35
|
+
|
36
|
+
it "calls assert_equal()" do
|
37
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1} == 2 }
|
38
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1} == 3 }
|
39
|
+
msg = ("Expected: 3\n" +
|
40
|
+
" Actual: 2")
|
41
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
42
|
+
end
|
43
|
+
|
44
|
+
it "calls refute_equal() after NOT() called." do
|
45
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT == 3 }
|
46
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT == 2 }
|
47
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to not be equal to 2."
|
48
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
49
|
+
end
|
50
|
+
|
51
|
+
end
|
52
|
+
|
53
|
+
|
54
|
+
describe '#!=' do
|
55
|
+
|
56
|
+
it "calls refute_equal()." do
|
57
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1} != 3 }
|
58
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1} != 2 }
|
59
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to not be equal to 2."
|
60
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
61
|
+
end
|
62
|
+
|
63
|
+
it "calls assert_equal() after NOT() called." do
|
64
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT != 2 }
|
65
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT != 3 }
|
66
|
+
msg = ("Expected: 3\n" +
|
67
|
+
" Actual: 2")
|
68
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
69
|
+
end
|
70
|
+
|
71
|
+
end
|
72
|
+
|
73
|
+
|
74
|
+
describe '#>' do
|
75
|
+
|
76
|
+
it "calls assert_operator(:>)." do
|
77
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1} > 1 }
|
78
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1} > 2 }
|
79
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1} > 3 }
|
80
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to be > 3."
|
81
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
82
|
+
end
|
83
|
+
|
84
|
+
it "calls refute_operator(:>) after NOT() called." do
|
85
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT > 3 }
|
86
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT > 2 }
|
87
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT > 1 }
|
88
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to not be > 1."
|
89
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
90
|
+
end
|
91
|
+
|
92
|
+
end
|
93
|
+
|
94
|
+
|
95
|
+
describe '#>=' do
|
96
|
+
|
97
|
+
it "calls assert_operator(:>=)." do
|
98
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1} >= 1 }
|
99
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1} >= 2 }
|
100
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1} >= 3 }
|
101
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to be >= 3."
|
102
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
103
|
+
end
|
104
|
+
|
105
|
+
it "calls refute_operator(:>=) after NOT() called." do
|
106
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT >= 3 }
|
107
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT >= 2 }
|
108
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT >= 1 }
|
109
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to not be >= 1."
|
110
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
111
|
+
end
|
112
|
+
|
113
|
+
end
|
114
|
+
|
115
|
+
|
116
|
+
describe '#<' do
|
117
|
+
|
118
|
+
it "calls assert_operator(:<)." do
|
119
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1} < 3 }
|
120
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1} < 2 }
|
121
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1} < 1 }
|
122
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to be < 1."
|
123
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
124
|
+
end
|
125
|
+
|
126
|
+
it "calls refute_operator(:<) after NOT() called." do
|
127
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT < 1 }
|
128
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT < 2 }
|
129
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT < 3 }
|
130
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to not be < 3."
|
131
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
132
|
+
end
|
133
|
+
|
134
|
+
end
|
135
|
+
|
136
|
+
|
137
|
+
describe '#<=' do
|
138
|
+
|
139
|
+
it "calls assert_operator(:<=)." do
|
140
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1} <= 3 }
|
141
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1} <= 2 }
|
142
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1} <= 1 }
|
143
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to be <= 1."
|
144
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
145
|
+
end
|
146
|
+
|
147
|
+
it "calls refute_operator(:<=) after NOT() called." do
|
148
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT <= 1 }
|
149
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT <= 2 }
|
150
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1+1}.NOT <= 3 }
|
151
|
+
msg = "Expected 2 to not be <= 3."
|
152
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
153
|
+
end
|
154
|
+
|
155
|
+
end
|
156
|
+
|
157
|
+
|
158
|
+
describe '#===' do
|
159
|
+
|
160
|
+
it "calls assert_operator(:===)." do
|
161
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {String} === 'foo' }
|
162
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {/\d+/ } === '123' }
|
163
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {String} === 123 }
|
164
|
+
msg = 'Expected String to be === 123.'
|
165
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
166
|
+
end
|
167
|
+
|
168
|
+
it "calls refuse_operator(:===) after NOT() called." do
|
169
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {String}.NOT === 123 }
|
170
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {/\d+/ }.NOT === 'abc' }
|
171
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {String}.NOT === '123' }
|
172
|
+
msg = 'Expected String to not be === "123".'
|
173
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
174
|
+
end
|
175
|
+
|
176
|
+
end
|
177
|
+
|
178
|
+
|
179
|
+
describe '#=~' do
|
180
|
+
|
181
|
+
it "calls assert_match()." do
|
182
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"hom"} =~ /\w+/ }
|
183
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"hom"} =~ /\d+/ }
|
184
|
+
msg = 'Expected /\d+/ to match "hom".'
|
185
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
186
|
+
end
|
187
|
+
|
188
|
+
it "calls refute_match() after NOT() called." do
|
189
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"hom"}.NOT =~ /\d+/ }
|
190
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"hom"}.NOT =~ /\w+/ }
|
191
|
+
msg = 'Expected /\w+/ to not match "hom".'
|
192
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
193
|
+
end
|
194
|
+
|
195
|
+
end
|
196
|
+
|
197
|
+
|
198
|
+
describe '#!~' do
|
199
|
+
|
200
|
+
it "calls refute_match()." do
|
201
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"hom"} !~ /\d+/ }
|
202
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"hom"} !~ /\w+/ }
|
203
|
+
msg = 'Expected /\w+/ to not match "hom".'
|
204
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
205
|
+
end
|
206
|
+
|
207
|
+
it "calls assert_match() after NOT() called." do
|
208
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"hom"}.NOT !~ /\w+/ }
|
209
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"hom"}.NOT !~ /\d+/ }
|
210
|
+
msg = 'Expected /\d+/ to match "hom".'
|
211
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
212
|
+
end
|
213
|
+
|
214
|
+
end
|
215
|
+
|
216
|
+
|
217
|
+
describe '#is_a?' do
|
218
|
+
|
219
|
+
it "calls assert_kind_of()." do
|
220
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"hom"}.is_a?(String) }
|
221
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"hom"}.is_a?(Array) }
|
222
|
+
msg = 'Expected "hom" to be a kind of Array, not String.'
|
223
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
224
|
+
end
|
225
|
+
|
226
|
+
it "calls refute_kind_of() after NOT() called." do
|
227
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"hom"}.NOT.is_a?(Array) }
|
228
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"hom"}.NOT.is_a?(String) }
|
229
|
+
msg = 'Expected "hom" to not be a kind of String.'
|
230
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
231
|
+
end
|
232
|
+
|
233
|
+
end
|
234
|
+
|
235
|
+
|
236
|
+
describe '#kind_of?' do
|
237
|
+
|
238
|
+
it "calls assert_kind_of()." do
|
239
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"hom"}.kind_of?(String) }
|
240
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"hom"}.kind_of?(Array) }
|
241
|
+
msg = 'Expected "hom" to be a kind of Array, not String.'
|
242
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
243
|
+
end
|
244
|
+
|
245
|
+
it "calls refute_kind_of() after NOT() called." do
|
246
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"hom"}.NOT.kind_of?(Array) }
|
247
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"hom"}.NOT.kind_of?(String) }
|
248
|
+
msg = 'Expected "hom" to not be a kind of String.'
|
249
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
250
|
+
end
|
251
|
+
|
252
|
+
end
|
253
|
+
|
254
|
+
|
255
|
+
describe '#instance_of?' do
|
256
|
+
|
257
|
+
it "calls assert_instance_of()." do
|
258
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {123}.instance_of?(Fixnum) }
|
259
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {123}.instance_of?(Integer) }
|
260
|
+
msg = 'Expected 123 to be an instance of Integer, not Fixnum.'
|
261
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
262
|
+
end
|
263
|
+
|
264
|
+
it "calls refute_instance_of() after NOT() called." do
|
265
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {123}.NOT.instance_of?(Integer) }
|
266
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {123}.NOT.instance_of?(Fixnum) }
|
267
|
+
msg = 'Expected 123 to not be an instance of Fixnum.'
|
268
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
269
|
+
end
|
270
|
+
|
271
|
+
end
|
272
|
+
|
273
|
+
|
274
|
+
describe '#same?' do
|
275
|
+
|
276
|
+
it "calls assert_same()." do
|
277
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {123}.same?(123) }
|
278
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {[1]}.same?([1]) }
|
279
|
+
msg = /^Expected \[1\] \(oid=\d+\) to be the same as \[1\] \(oid=\d+\)\.$/
|
280
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
281
|
+
end
|
282
|
+
|
283
|
+
it "calls refute_same() after NOT() called." do
|
284
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {[1]}.NOT.same?([1]) }
|
285
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {123}.NOT.same?(123) }
|
286
|
+
msg = /^Expected 123 \(oid=\d+\) to not be the same as 123 \(oid=\d+\)\.$/
|
287
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
288
|
+
end
|
289
|
+
|
290
|
+
end
|
291
|
+
|
292
|
+
|
293
|
+
describe '#empty?' do
|
294
|
+
|
295
|
+
it "calls assert_empty()." do
|
296
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {[ ]}.empty? }
|
297
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {[1]}.empty? }
|
298
|
+
msg = "Expected [1] to be empty."
|
299
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
300
|
+
end
|
301
|
+
|
302
|
+
it "calls refute_empty() after NOT() called." do
|
303
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {[1]}.NOT.empty? }
|
304
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {[ ]}.NOT.empty? }
|
305
|
+
msg = "Expected [] to not be empty."
|
306
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
307
|
+
end
|
308
|
+
|
309
|
+
end
|
310
|
+
|
311
|
+
|
312
|
+
describe '#in_delta?' do
|
313
|
+
|
314
|
+
it "calls assert_in_delta()." do
|
315
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {3.14159}.in_delta?(3.14, 0.01) }
|
316
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {3.14159}.in_delta?(3.14, 0.001) }
|
317
|
+
msg = /^Expected \|?3\.14 - 3\.14159\|? \(0\.0015899\d+\) to be <=? 0\.001\.$/
|
318
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
319
|
+
end
|
320
|
+
|
321
|
+
it "calls refute_in_delta() after NOT() called." do
|
322
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {3.14159}.NOT.in_delta?(3.14, 0.001) }
|
323
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {3.14159}.NOT.in_delta?(3.14, 0.01) }
|
324
|
+
msg = /^Expected \|?3\.14 - 3\.14159\|? \(0\.0015899\d+\) to not be <=? 0\.01\.$/
|
325
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
326
|
+
end
|
327
|
+
|
328
|
+
end
|
329
|
+
|
330
|
+
|
331
|
+
describe '#in_epsilon?' do
|
332
|
+
|
333
|
+
it "calls assert_in_epsilon()." do
|
334
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {3.14159}.in_epsilon?(3.14, 0.001) }
|
335
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {3.14159}.in_epsilon?(3.14, 0.0001) }
|
336
|
+
msg = /^Expected \|?3\.14 - 3\.14159\|? \(0.00158999\d+\) to be <=? 0\.000314000\d+\.$/
|
337
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
338
|
+
end
|
339
|
+
|
340
|
+
it "calls refute_in_epsilon() after NOT() called." do
|
341
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {3.14159}.NOT.in_epsilon?(3.14, 0.0001) }
|
342
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {3.14159}.NOT.in_epsilon?(3.14, 0.001) }
|
343
|
+
msg = /^Expected \|?3\.14 - 3\.14159\|? \(0.00158999\d+\) to not be <=? 0\.00314\.$/
|
344
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
345
|
+
end
|
346
|
+
|
347
|
+
end
|
348
|
+
|
349
|
+
|
350
|
+
describe '#raise?' do
|
351
|
+
|
352
|
+
it "calls assert_raises()." do
|
353
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {proc{1/0}}.raise?(ZeroDivisionError) }
|
354
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {proc{1/1}}.raise?(ZeroDivisionError) }
|
355
|
+
msg = "ZeroDivisionError expected but nothing was raised."
|
356
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
357
|
+
end
|
358
|
+
|
359
|
+
it "fails when exception raised after NOT() called." do
|
360
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {proc{1/1}}.NOT.raise?(ZeroDivisionError) }
|
361
|
+
#
|
362
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {proc{1/0}}.NOT.raise?(ZeroDivisionError) }
|
363
|
+
msg = "Exception ZeroDivisionError raised unexpectedly."
|
364
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
365
|
+
#
|
366
|
+
assert_raises(ZeroDivisionError) do
|
367
|
+
ok {proc{1/0}}.NOT.raise?(NoMethodError)
|
368
|
+
end
|
369
|
+
end
|
370
|
+
|
371
|
+
it "can take error message in addition to exception class." do
|
372
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {proc{1/0}}.raise?(ZeroDivisionError, "divided by 0") }
|
373
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {proc{1/0}}.raise?(ZeroDivisionError, /by [0]/) }
|
374
|
+
end
|
375
|
+
|
376
|
+
end
|
377
|
+
|
378
|
+
|
379
|
+
describe '#throw?' do
|
380
|
+
|
381
|
+
it "calls assert_throws()." do
|
382
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {proc { throw :exit }}.throw?(:exit) }
|
383
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {proc { throw :exit }}.throw?(:finish) }
|
384
|
+
msg = "Expected :finish to have been thrown, not :exit."
|
385
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
386
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {proc { var = 1 + 1 }}.throw?(:exit) }
|
387
|
+
msg = "Expected :exit to have been thrown."
|
388
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
389
|
+
end
|
390
|
+
|
391
|
+
it "raises error because refute_raise() is not defiend in Minitest." do
|
392
|
+
ex = assert_raises(RuntimeError) do
|
393
|
+
ok {proc { throw :exit }}.NOT.throw?(:finish)
|
394
|
+
end
|
395
|
+
msg = "NOT.throw? is unsupported because refute_throws() is not defined in Minitest."
|
396
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
397
|
+
end
|
398
|
+
|
399
|
+
end
|
400
|
+
|
401
|
+
|
402
|
+
describe '#respond_to?' do
|
403
|
+
|
404
|
+
it "calls assert_respond_to()." do
|
405
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {[1]}.respond_to?(:each) }
|
406
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {123}.respond_to?(:each) }
|
407
|
+
msg = "Expected 123 (Fixnum) to respond to #each."
|
408
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
409
|
+
end
|
410
|
+
|
411
|
+
it "calls refute_respond_to() after NOT() called." do
|
412
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {[1]}.respond_to?(:each) }
|
413
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {123}.respond_to?(:each) }
|
414
|
+
msg = "Expected 123 (Fixnum) to respond to #each."
|
415
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
416
|
+
end
|
417
|
+
|
418
|
+
end
|
419
|
+
|
420
|
+
|
421
|
+
describe '#include?' do
|
422
|
+
|
423
|
+
it "calls assert_includes()." do
|
424
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1..9}.include?(2) }
|
425
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1..9}.include?(0) }
|
426
|
+
msg = "Expected 1..9 to include 0."
|
427
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
428
|
+
end
|
429
|
+
|
430
|
+
it "calls refute_includes() after NOT() called." do
|
431
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1..9}.NOT.include?(0) }
|
432
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1..9}.NOT.include?(2) }
|
433
|
+
msg = "Expected 1..9 to not include 2."
|
434
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
435
|
+
end
|
436
|
+
|
437
|
+
end
|
438
|
+
|
439
|
+
|
440
|
+
describe '#in?' do
|
441
|
+
|
442
|
+
it "calls assert_includes()." do
|
443
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {1}.in?(1..9) }
|
444
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {0}.in?(1..9) }
|
445
|
+
msg = "Expected 1..9 to include 0."
|
446
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
447
|
+
end
|
448
|
+
|
449
|
+
it "calls refute_includes() after NOT() called." do
|
450
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {0}.NOT.in?(1..9) }
|
451
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {1}.NOT.in?(1..9) }
|
452
|
+
msg = "Expected 1..9 to not include 1."
|
453
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
454
|
+
end
|
455
|
+
|
456
|
+
end
|
457
|
+
|
458
|
+
|
459
|
+
describe '#output?' do
|
460
|
+
|
461
|
+
it "calls assert_output()." do
|
462
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {proc {puts 123}}.output?("123\n", "") }
|
463
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {proc {puts 123}}.output?("", "123\n") }
|
464
|
+
msg = [
|
465
|
+
'In stderr.',
|
466
|
+
'--- expected',
|
467
|
+
'+++ actual',
|
468
|
+
'@@ -1,2 +1 @@',
|
469
|
+
'-"123',
|
470
|
+
'-"',
|
471
|
+
'+""',
|
472
|
+
'',
|
473
|
+
].join("\n")
|
474
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
475
|
+
end
|
476
|
+
|
477
|
+
it "raises error when called after NOT()." do
|
478
|
+
ex = assert_raises(RuntimeError) do
|
479
|
+
ok {proc { nil }}.NOT.output?("123", "")
|
480
|
+
end
|
481
|
+
msg = "use ok().silent? instead of ok().NOT.output?."
|
482
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
483
|
+
end
|
484
|
+
|
485
|
+
end
|
486
|
+
|
487
|
+
|
488
|
+
describe '#silent?' do
|
489
|
+
|
490
|
+
it "calls assert_silent()." do
|
491
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {proc {nil}}.silent? }
|
492
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {proc {puts 123}}.silent? }
|
493
|
+
msg = [
|
494
|
+
'In stdout.',
|
495
|
+
'--- expected',
|
496
|
+
'+++ actual',
|
497
|
+
'@@ -1 +1,2 @@',
|
498
|
+
'-""',
|
499
|
+
'+"123',
|
500
|
+
'+"',
|
501
|
+
'',
|
502
|
+
].join("\n")
|
503
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
504
|
+
end
|
505
|
+
|
506
|
+
it "raises error when called after NOT()." do
|
507
|
+
ex = assert_raises(RuntimeError) do
|
508
|
+
ok {proc { puts 123 }}.NOT.silent?
|
509
|
+
end
|
510
|
+
msg = "use ok().output? instead of ok().NOT.silent?."
|
511
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
512
|
+
end
|
513
|
+
|
514
|
+
end
|
515
|
+
|
516
|
+
|
517
|
+
describe '#frozen?' do
|
518
|
+
|
519
|
+
it "calls assert_predicate()." do
|
520
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"".freeze}.frozen? }
|
521
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"".dup() }.frozen? }
|
522
|
+
msg = 'Expected "" to be frozen?.'
|
523
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
524
|
+
end
|
525
|
+
|
526
|
+
it "calls refute_predicate() after NOT() called." do
|
527
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"".dup() }.NOT.frozen? }
|
528
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"".freeze}.NOT.frozen? }
|
529
|
+
msg = 'Expected "" to not be frozen?.'
|
530
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
531
|
+
end
|
532
|
+
|
533
|
+
end
|
534
|
+
|
535
|
+
|
536
|
+
describe '#tainted?' do
|
537
|
+
|
538
|
+
it "calls assert_predicate()." do
|
539
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"".taint}.tainted? }
|
540
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"".dup()}.tainted? }
|
541
|
+
msg = 'Expected "" to be tainted?.'
|
542
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
543
|
+
end
|
544
|
+
|
545
|
+
it "calls refute_predicate() after NOT() called." do
|
546
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"".dup()}.NOT.tainted? }
|
547
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"".taint}.NOT.tainted? }
|
548
|
+
msg = 'Expected "" to not be tainted?.'
|
549
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
550
|
+
end
|
551
|
+
|
552
|
+
end
|
553
|
+
|
554
|
+
|
555
|
+
describe '#instance_variable_defined?' do
|
556
|
+
|
557
|
+
def obj_with_x(x)
|
558
|
+
obj = Object.new
|
559
|
+
obj.instance_variable_set('@x', x)
|
560
|
+
return obj
|
561
|
+
end
|
562
|
+
|
563
|
+
it "calls assert()." do
|
564
|
+
obj = obj_with_x(10)
|
565
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {obj}.instance_variable_defined?('@x') }
|
566
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {obj}.instance_variable_defined?('@y') }
|
567
|
+
msg = /^Expected #<Object:\w+ @x=10> to have instance variable \@y, but not\.$/
|
568
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
569
|
+
end
|
570
|
+
|
571
|
+
it "calls refute() after NOT() called." do
|
572
|
+
obj = obj_with_x(10)
|
573
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {obj}.NOT.instance_variable_defined?('@y') }
|
574
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {obj}.NOT.instance_variable_defined?('@x') }
|
575
|
+
msg = /^Expected #<Object:\w+ @x=10> not to have instance variable \@x, but has it\.$/
|
576
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
577
|
+
end
|
578
|
+
|
579
|
+
end
|
580
|
+
|
581
|
+
|
582
|
+
describe '#method_missing()' do
|
583
|
+
|
584
|
+
it "calls super when not predicate." do
|
585
|
+
x = nil
|
586
|
+
ex = assert_raises(NoMethodError) do
|
587
|
+
(x = ok {nil}).append('bar')
|
588
|
+
end
|
589
|
+
x._mark_as_tested()
|
590
|
+
msg = /^undefined method `append' for \#<Mini[tT]est::Ok::AssertionObject:\w+>$/
|
591
|
+
assert_match msg, ex.message
|
592
|
+
#
|
593
|
+
ex = assert_raises(NoMethodError) do
|
594
|
+
ok {nil}.start_with?('bar')
|
595
|
+
end
|
596
|
+
msg = "undefined method `start_with?' for nil:NilClass"
|
597
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
598
|
+
end
|
599
|
+
|
600
|
+
it "calles assert()." do
|
601
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"foobar"}.start_with?('foo') }
|
602
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"foobar"}.start_with?('bar') }
|
603
|
+
msg = 'Expected "foobar".start_with?("bar") but failed.'
|
604
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
605
|
+
#
|
606
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {[1,2,3]}.all? {|x| x <= 3 }}
|
607
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {[1,2,3]}.any? {|x| x % 2 == 0}}
|
608
|
+
end
|
609
|
+
|
610
|
+
it "calles refute() after NOT() called." do
|
611
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {"foobar"}.NOT.start_with?('bar') }
|
612
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {"foobar"}.NOT.start_with?('foo') }
|
613
|
+
msg = 'Expected "foobar".start_with?("foo") to fail but succeeded.'
|
614
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
615
|
+
end
|
616
|
+
|
617
|
+
it "calls corresponding 'assert_xxxx' when 'xxxx?' called." do
|
618
|
+
MiniTest::Assertions.class_eval do
|
619
|
+
def assert_utf8(str)
|
620
|
+
assert str.encoding == Encoding::UTF_8, "Expected utf-8 string but not."
|
621
|
+
end
|
622
|
+
end
|
623
|
+
utf8 = "foobar".force_encoding('utf-8')
|
624
|
+
ascii = "foobar".force_encoding('us-ascii')
|
625
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {utf8 }.utf8? }
|
626
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {ascii}.utf8? }
|
627
|
+
msg = 'Expected utf-8 string but not.'
|
628
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
629
|
+
end
|
630
|
+
|
631
|
+
it "calls corresponding 'refute_xxxx' when 'xxxx?' called after NOT() called." do
|
632
|
+
MiniTest::Assertions.class_eval do
|
633
|
+
def refute_utf8(str)
|
634
|
+
refute str.encoding == Encoding::UTF_8, "Expected non utf-8 string but it is."
|
635
|
+
end
|
636
|
+
end
|
637
|
+
utf8 = "foobar".force_encoding('utf-8')
|
638
|
+
ascii = "foobar".force_encoding('us-ascii')
|
639
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {ascii}.NOT.utf8? }
|
640
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {utf8 }.NOT.utf8? }
|
641
|
+
msg = 'Expected non utf-8 string but it is.'
|
642
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
643
|
+
end
|
644
|
+
|
645
|
+
end
|
646
|
+
|
647
|
+
|
648
|
+
describe '#truthy?' do
|
649
|
+
|
650
|
+
it "calles assert()." do
|
651
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {123}.truthy? }
|
652
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {nil}.truthy? }
|
653
|
+
msg = 'Expected (!! nil) == true, but not.'
|
654
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
655
|
+
end
|
656
|
+
|
657
|
+
it "calles refute() after NOT() called." do
|
658
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {nil}.NOT.truthy? }
|
659
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {123}.NOT.truthy? }
|
660
|
+
msg = 'Expected (!! 123) == false, but not.'
|
661
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
662
|
+
end
|
663
|
+
|
664
|
+
end
|
665
|
+
|
666
|
+
|
667
|
+
describe '#falthy?' do
|
668
|
+
|
669
|
+
it "calles refute()." do
|
670
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {nil}.falthy? }
|
671
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {123}.falthy? }
|
672
|
+
msg = 'Expected (!! 123) == false, but not.'
|
673
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
674
|
+
end
|
675
|
+
|
676
|
+
it "calles assert() after NOT() called." do
|
677
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {123}.NOT.falthy? }
|
678
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {nil}.NOT.falthy? }
|
679
|
+
msg = 'Expected (!! nil) == true, but not.'
|
680
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
681
|
+
end
|
682
|
+
|
683
|
+
end
|
684
|
+
|
685
|
+
|
686
|
+
describe '#attr' do
|
687
|
+
|
688
|
+
class User
|
689
|
+
def initialize(name, age)
|
690
|
+
@name, @age = name, age
|
691
|
+
end
|
692
|
+
attr_accessor :name, :age
|
693
|
+
end
|
694
|
+
|
695
|
+
it "calles assert_equal()." do
|
696
|
+
user = User.new('Haruhi', 16)
|
697
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {user}.attr(:name, 'Haruhi').attr(:age, 16) }
|
698
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {user}.attr(:name, 'Haruhi').attr(:age, 12) }
|
699
|
+
msg = ("Expected <object>.age == <exected>, but failed.\n" +
|
700
|
+
" (object: #<User:0xXXXXXX @name=\"Haruhi\", @age=16>).\n" +
|
701
|
+
"Expected: 12\n" +
|
702
|
+
" Actual: 16")
|
703
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message.gsub(/<User:0x\w+/, '<User:0xXXXXXX')
|
704
|
+
end
|
705
|
+
|
706
|
+
it "calles refute_equal() after NOT() called." do
|
707
|
+
user = User.new('Haruhi', 16)
|
708
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {user}.NOT.attr(:name, 'Suzumiya').attr(:age, 12) }
|
709
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {user}.NOT.attr(:name, 'Suzumiya').attr(:age, 16) }
|
710
|
+
msg = ("Expected <object>.age != <exected>, but failed.\n" +
|
711
|
+
" (object: #<User:0xXXXXXX @name=\"Haruhi\", @age=16>).\n" +
|
712
|
+
"Expected 16 to not be equal to 16.")
|
713
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message.gsub(/<User:0x\w+/, '<User:0xXXXXXX')
|
714
|
+
end
|
715
|
+
|
716
|
+
end
|
717
|
+
|
718
|
+
|
719
|
+
describe '#attrs' do
|
720
|
+
|
721
|
+
class User
|
722
|
+
def initialize(name, age)
|
723
|
+
@name, @age = name, age
|
724
|
+
end
|
725
|
+
attr_accessor :name, :age
|
726
|
+
end
|
727
|
+
|
728
|
+
it "calles assert_equal()." do
|
729
|
+
user = User.new('Haruhi', 16)
|
730
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {user}.attrs(name: 'Haruhi', age: 16) }
|
731
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {user}.attrs(name: 'Haruhi', age: 12) }
|
732
|
+
msg = ("Expected <object>.age == <exected>, but failed.\n" +
|
733
|
+
" (object: #<User:0xXXXXXX @name=\"Haruhi\", @age=16>).\n" +
|
734
|
+
"Expected: 12\n" +
|
735
|
+
" Actual: 16")
|
736
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message.gsub(/<User:0x\w+/, '<User:0xXXXXXX')
|
737
|
+
end
|
738
|
+
|
739
|
+
it "calles refute_equal() after NOT() called." do
|
740
|
+
user = User.new('Haruhi', 16)
|
741
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {user}.NOT.attrs(name: 'Suzumiya', age: 12) }
|
742
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {user}.NOT.attrs(name: 'Suzumiya', age: 16) }
|
743
|
+
msg = ("Expected <object>.age != <exected>, but failed.\n" +
|
744
|
+
" (object: #<User:0xXXXXXX @name=\"Haruhi\", @age=16>).\n" +
|
745
|
+
"Expected 16 to not be equal to 16.")
|
746
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message.gsub(/<User:0x\w+/, '<User:0xXXXXXX')
|
747
|
+
end
|
748
|
+
|
749
|
+
end
|
750
|
+
|
751
|
+
|
752
|
+
describe '#item' do
|
753
|
+
|
754
|
+
it "calles assert_equal()." do
|
755
|
+
user = {:name=>'Haruhi', :age=>16}
|
756
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {user}.item(:name, 'Haruhi').item(:age, 16) }
|
757
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {user}.item(:name, 'Haruhi').item(:age, 12) }
|
758
|
+
msg = ("Expected <object>[:age] == <exected>, but failed.\n" +
|
759
|
+
" (object: {:name=>\"Haruhi\", :age=>16}).\n" +
|
760
|
+
"Expected: 12\n" +
|
761
|
+
" Actual: 16")
|
762
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
763
|
+
end
|
764
|
+
|
765
|
+
it "calles refute_equal() after NOT() called." do
|
766
|
+
user = {:name=>'Haruhi', :age=>16}
|
767
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {user}.NOT.item(:name, 'Suzumiya').item(:age, 12) }
|
768
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {user}.NOT.item(:name, 'Suzumiya').item(:age, 16) }
|
769
|
+
msg = ("Expected <object>[:age] != <exected>, but failed.\n" +
|
770
|
+
" (object: {:name=>\"Haruhi\", :age=>16}).\n" +
|
771
|
+
"Expected 16 to not be equal to 16.")
|
772
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
773
|
+
end
|
774
|
+
|
775
|
+
end
|
776
|
+
|
777
|
+
|
778
|
+
describe '#items' do
|
779
|
+
|
780
|
+
it "calles assert_equal()." do
|
781
|
+
user = {:name=>'Haruhi', :age=>16}
|
782
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {user}.items(name: 'Haruhi', age: 16) }
|
783
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {user}.items(name: 'Haruhi', age: 12) }
|
784
|
+
msg = ("Expected <object>[:age] == <exected>, but failed.\n" +
|
785
|
+
" (object: {:name=>\"Haruhi\", :age=>16}).\n" +
|
786
|
+
"Expected: 12\n" +
|
787
|
+
" Actual: 16")
|
788
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
789
|
+
end
|
790
|
+
|
791
|
+
it "calles refute_equal() after NOT() called." do
|
792
|
+
user = {:name=>'Haruhi', :age=>16}
|
793
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {user}.NOT.items(name: 'Suzumiya', age: 12) }
|
794
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {user}.NOT.items(name: 'Suzumiya', age: 16) }
|
795
|
+
msg = ("Expected <object>[:age] != <exected>, but failed.\n" +
|
796
|
+
" (object: {:name=>\"Haruhi\", :age=>16}).\n" +
|
797
|
+
"Expected 16 to not be equal to 16.")
|
798
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
799
|
+
end
|
800
|
+
|
801
|
+
end
|
802
|
+
|
803
|
+
|
804
|
+
describe '#file_exist?' do
|
805
|
+
|
806
|
+
it "calles assert()." do
|
807
|
+
fpath = __FILE__
|
808
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {fpath}.file_exist? }
|
809
|
+
#
|
810
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {'XXX'}.file_exist? }
|
811
|
+
msg = "File 'XXX' doesn't exist."
|
812
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
813
|
+
#
|
814
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {Dir.pwd}.file_exist? }
|
815
|
+
msg = "'#{Dir.pwd}' is not a file."
|
816
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
817
|
+
end
|
818
|
+
|
819
|
+
it "calles assert() after NOT() called." do
|
820
|
+
fpath = __FILE__
|
821
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {'XXX'}.NOT.file_exist? }
|
822
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {fpath}.NOT.file_exist? }
|
823
|
+
msg = "File '#{fpath}' exists unexpectedly."
|
824
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
825
|
+
end
|
826
|
+
|
827
|
+
end
|
828
|
+
|
829
|
+
|
830
|
+
describe '#dir_exist?' do
|
831
|
+
|
832
|
+
it "calles assert()." do
|
833
|
+
dpath = Dir.pwd
|
834
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {dpath}.dir_exist? }
|
835
|
+
#
|
836
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {'XXX'}.dir_exist? }
|
837
|
+
msg = "Directory 'XXX' doesn't exist."
|
838
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
839
|
+
#
|
840
|
+
fpath = __FILE__
|
841
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {fpath}.dir_exist? }
|
842
|
+
msg = "'#{fpath}' is not a directory."
|
843
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
844
|
+
end
|
845
|
+
|
846
|
+
it "calles assert() after NOT() called." do
|
847
|
+
dpath = Dir.pwd
|
848
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {'XXX'}.NOT.dir_exist? }
|
849
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {dpath}.NOT.dir_exist? }
|
850
|
+
msg = "Directory '#{dpath}' exists unexpectedly."
|
851
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
852
|
+
end
|
853
|
+
|
854
|
+
end
|
855
|
+
|
856
|
+
|
857
|
+
describe '#not_exist?' do
|
858
|
+
|
859
|
+
it "calles assert()." do
|
860
|
+
fpath = __FILE__
|
861
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {'XXX'}.not_exist? }
|
862
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {fpath}.not_exist? }
|
863
|
+
msg = "'#{fpath}' exists unexpectedly."
|
864
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
865
|
+
end
|
866
|
+
|
867
|
+
it "calles assert() after NOT() called." do
|
868
|
+
fpath = __FILE__
|
869
|
+
should_not_raise { ok {fpath}.NOT.not_exist? }
|
870
|
+
ex = should_raise { ok {'XXX'}.NOT.not_exist? }
|
871
|
+
msg = "'XXX' doesn't exist."
|
872
|
+
assert_equal msg, ex.message
|
873
|
+
end
|
874
|
+
|
875
|
+
end
|
876
|
+
|
877
|
+
|
878
|
+
end
|