launchdarkly-server-sdk 6.2.1 → 6.2.5

data/spec/impl/evaluator_segment_spec.rb

@@ -1,125 +0,0 @@
-require "spec_helper"
-require "impl/evaluator_spec_base"
-
-module LaunchDarkly
-  module Impl
-    describe "Evaluator (segments)", :evaluator_spec_base => true do
-      subject { Evaluator }
-
-      def test_segment_match(segment)
-        clause = make_segment_match_clause(segment)
-        flag = boolean_flag_with_clauses([clause])
-        e = Evaluator.new(get_nothing, get_things({ segment[:key] => segment }), logger)
-        e.evaluate(flag, user, factory).detail.value
-      end
-
-      it "retrieves segment from segment store for segmentMatch operator" do
-        segment = {
-          key: 'segkey',
-          included: [ 'userkey' ],
-          version: 1,
-          deleted: false
-        }
-        get_segment = get_things({ 'segkey' => segment })
-        e = subject.new(get_nothing, get_segment, logger)
-        user = { key: 'userkey' }
-        clause = { attribute: '', op: 'segmentMatch', values: ['segkey'] }
-        flag = boolean_flag_with_clauses([clause])
-        expect(e.evaluate(flag, user, factory).detail.value).to be true
-      end
-
-      it "falls through with no errors if referenced segment is not found" do
-        e = subject.new(get_nothing, get_things({ 'segkey' => nil }), logger)
-        user = { key: 'userkey' }
-        clause = { attribute: '', op: 'segmentMatch', values: ['segkey'] }
-        flag = boolean_flag_with_clauses([clause])
-        expect(e.evaluate(flag, user, factory).detail.value).to be false
-      end
-
-      it 'explicitly includes user' do
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:included] = [ user[:key] ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be true
-      end
-
-      it 'explicitly excludes user' do
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:excluded] = [ user[:key] ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be false
-      end
-
-      it 'both includes and excludes user; include takes priority' do
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:included] = [ user[:key] ]
-        segment[:excluded] = [ user[:key] ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be true
-      end
-
-      it 'matches user by rule when weight is absent' do
-        segClause = make_user_matching_clause(user, :email)
-        segRule = {
-          clauses: [ segClause ]
-        }
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:rules] = [ segRule ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be true
-      end
-
-      it 'matches user by rule when weight is nil' do
-        segClause = make_user_matching_clause(user, :email)
-        segRule = {
-          clauses: [ segClause ],
-          weight: nil
-        }
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:rules] = [ segRule ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be true
-      end
-
-      it 'matches user with full rollout' do
-        segClause = make_user_matching_clause(user, :email)
-        segRule = {
-          clauses: [ segClause ],
-          weight: 100000
-        }
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:rules] = [ segRule ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be true
-      end
-
-      it "doesn't match user with zero rollout" do
-        segClause = make_user_matching_clause(user, :email)
-        segRule = {
-          clauses: [ segClause ],
-          weight: 0
-        }
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:rules] = [ segRule ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be false
-      end
-
-      it "matches user with multiple clauses" do
-        segClause1 = make_user_matching_clause(user, :email)
-        segClause2 = make_user_matching_clause(user, :name)
-        segRule = {
-          clauses: [ segClause1, segClause2 ]
-        }
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:rules] = [ segRule ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be true
-      end
-
-      it "doesn't match user with multiple clauses if a clause doesn't match" do
-        segClause1 = make_user_matching_clause(user, :email)
-        segClause2 = make_user_matching_clause(user, :name)
-        segClause2[:values] = [ 'wrong' ]
-        segRule = {
-          clauses: [ segClause1, segClause2 ]
-        }
-        segment = make_segment('segkey')
-        segment[:rules] = [ segRule ]
-        expect(test_segment_match(segment)).to be false
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end

data/spec/impl/evaluator_spec.rb

@@ -1,349 +0,0 @@
-require "spec_helper"
-require "impl/evaluator_spec_base"
-
-module LaunchDarkly
-  module Impl
-    describe "Evaluator (general)", :evaluator_spec_base => true do
-      subject { Evaluator }
-
-      describe "evaluate" do
-        it "returns off variation if flag is off" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: false,
-            offVariation: 1,
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new('b', 1, EvaluationReason::off)
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "returns nil if flag is off and off variation is unspecified" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: false,
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new(nil, nil, EvaluationReason::off)
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "returns an error if off variation is too high" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: false,
-            offVariation: 999,
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new(nil, nil,
-            EvaluationReason::error(EvaluationReason::ERROR_MALFORMED_FLAG))
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "returns an error if off variation is negative" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: false,
-            offVariation: -1,
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new(nil, nil,
-            EvaluationReason::error(EvaluationReason::ERROR_MALFORMED_FLAG))
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "returns off variation if prerequisite is not found" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature0',
-            on: true,
-            prerequisites: [{key: 'badfeature', variation: 1}],
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new('b', 1, EvaluationReason::prerequisite_failed('badfeature'))
-          e = subject.new(get_things( 'badfeature' => nil ), get_nothing, logger)
-          result = e.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "reuses prerequisite-failed reason instances if possible" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature0',
-            on: true,
-            prerequisites: [{key: 'badfeature', variation: 1}],
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          Model.postprocess_item_after_deserializing!(FEATURES, flag)  # now there's a cached reason
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          e = subject.new(get_things( 'badfeature' => nil ), get_nothing, logger)
-          result1 = e.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result1.detail.reason).to eq EvaluationReason::prerequisite_failed('badfeature')
-          result2 = e.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result2.detail.reason).to be result1.detail.reason
-        end
-
-        it "returns off variation and event if prerequisite of a prerequisite is not found" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature0',
-            on: true,
-            prerequisites: [{key: 'feature1', variation: 1}],
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
-            version: 1
-          }
-          flag1 = {
-            key: 'feature1',
-            on: true,
-            prerequisites: [{key: 'feature2', variation: 1}], # feature2 doesn't exist
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            variations: ['d', 'e'],
-            version: 2
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new('b', 1, EvaluationReason::prerequisite_failed('feature1'))
-          events_should_be = [{
-            kind: 'feature', key: 'feature1', user: user, value: nil, default: nil, variation: nil, version: 2, prereqOf: 'feature0'
-          }]
-          get_flag = get_things('feature1' => flag1, 'feature2' => nil)
-          e = subject.new(get_flag, get_nothing, logger)
-          result = e.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(events_should_be)
-        end
-
-        it "returns off variation and event if prerequisite is off" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature0',
-            on: true,
-            prerequisites: [{key: 'feature1', variation: 1}],
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
-            version: 1
-          }
-          flag1 = {
-            key: 'feature1',
-            on: false,
-            # note that even though it returns the desired variation, it is still off and therefore not a match
-            offVariation: 1,
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            variations: ['d', 'e'],
-            version: 2
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new('b', 1, EvaluationReason::prerequisite_failed('feature1'))
-          events_should_be = [{
-            kind: 'feature', key: 'feature1', user: user, variation: 1, value: 'e', default: nil, version: 2, prereqOf: 'feature0'
-          }]
-          get_flag = get_things({ 'feature1' => flag1 })
-          e = subject.new(get_flag, get_nothing, logger)
-          result = e.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(events_should_be)
-        end
-
-        it "returns off variation and event if prerequisite is not met" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature0',
-            on: true,
-            prerequisites: [{key: 'feature1', variation: 1}],
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
-            version: 1
-          }
-          flag1 = {
-            key: 'feature1',
-            on: true,
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            variations: ['d', 'e'],
-            version: 2
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new('b', 1, EvaluationReason::prerequisite_failed('feature1'))
-          events_should_be = [{
-            kind: 'feature', key: 'feature1', user: user, variation: 0, value: 'd', default: nil, version: 2, prereqOf: 'feature0'
-          }]
-          get_flag = get_things({ 'feature1' => flag1 })
-          e = subject.new(get_flag, get_nothing, logger)
-          result = e.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(events_should_be)
-        end
-
-        it "returns fallthrough variation and event if prerequisite is met and there are no rules" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature0',
-            on: true,
-            prerequisites: [{key: 'feature1', variation: 1}],
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
-            version: 1
-          }
-          flag1 = {
-            key: 'feature1',
-            on: true,
-            fallthrough: { variation: 1 },
-            variations: ['d', 'e'],
-            version: 2
-          }
-          user = { key: 'x' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new('a', 0, EvaluationReason::fallthrough)
-          events_should_be = [{
-            kind: 'feature', key: 'feature1', user: user, variation: 1, value: 'e', default: nil, version: 2, prereqOf: 'feature0'
-          }]
-          get_flag = get_things({ 'feature1' => flag1 })
-          e = subject.new(get_flag, get_nothing, logger)
-          result = e.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(events_should_be)
-        end
-
-        it "returns an error if fallthrough variation is too high" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: true,
-            fallthrough: { variation: 999 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'userkey' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new(nil, nil, EvaluationReason::error(EvaluationReason::ERROR_MALFORMED_FLAG))
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "returns an error if fallthrough variation is negative" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: true,
-            fallthrough: { variation: -1 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'userkey' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new(nil, nil, EvaluationReason::error(EvaluationReason::ERROR_MALFORMED_FLAG))
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "returns an error if fallthrough has no variation or rollout" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: true,
-            fallthrough: { },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'userkey' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new(nil, nil, EvaluationReason::error(EvaluationReason::ERROR_MALFORMED_FLAG))
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "returns an error if fallthrough has a rollout with no variations" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: true,
-            fallthrough: { rollout: { variations: [] } },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'userkey' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new(nil, nil, EvaluationReason::error(EvaluationReason::ERROR_MALFORMED_FLAG))
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        it "matches user from targets" do
-          flag = {
-            key: 'feature',
-            on: true,
-            targets: [
-              { values: [ 'whoever', 'userkey' ], variation: 2 }
-            ],
-            fallthrough: { variation: 0 },
-            offVariation: 1,
-            variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-          }
-          user = { key: 'userkey' }
-          detail = EvaluationDetail.new('c', 2, EvaluationReason::target_match)
-          result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-          expect(result.detail).to eq(detail)
-          expect(result.events).to eq(nil)
-        end
-
-        describe "experiment rollout behavior" do
-          it "sets the in_experiment value if rollout kind is experiment and untracked false" do
-            flag = {
-              key: 'feature',
-              on: true,
-              fallthrough: { rollout: { kind: 'experiment', variations: [ { weight: 100000, variation: 1, untracked: false } ]  } },
-              offVariation: 1,
-              variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-            }
-            user = { key: 'userkey' }
-            result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-            expect(result.detail.reason.to_json).to include('"inExperiment":true')
-            expect(result.detail.reason.in_experiment).to eq(true)
-          end
-
-          it "does not set the in_experiment value if rollout kind is not experiment" do
-            flag = {
-              key: 'feature',
-              on: true,
-              fallthrough: { rollout: { kind: 'rollout', variations: [ { weight: 100000, variation: 1, untracked: false } ]  } },
-              offVariation: 1,
-              variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-            }
-            user = { key: 'userkey' }
-            result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-            expect(result.detail.reason.to_json).to_not include('"inExperiment":true')
-            expect(result.detail.reason.in_experiment).to eq(nil)
-          end
-
-          it "does not set the in_experiment value if rollout kind is experiment and untracked is true" do
-            flag = {
-              key: 'feature',
-              on: true,
-              fallthrough: { rollout: { kind: 'experiment', variations: [ { weight: 100000, variation: 1, untracked: true } ]  } },
-              offVariation: 1,
-              variations: ['a', 'b', 'c']
-            }
-            user = { key: 'userkey' }
-            result = basic_evaluator.evaluate(flag, user, factory)
-            expect(result.detail.reason.to_json).to_not include('"inExperiment":true')
-            expect(result.detail.reason.in_experiment).to eq(nil)
-          end
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end

data/spec/impl/evaluator_spec_base.rb

@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
-require "spec_helper"
-
-module LaunchDarkly
-  module Impl
-    module EvaluatorSpecBase
-      def factory
-        EventFactory.new(false)
-      end
-
-      def user
-        {
-          key: "userkey",
-          email: "test@example.com",
-          name: "Bob"
-        }
-      end
-
-      def logger
-        ::Logger.new($stdout, level: ::Logger::FATAL)
-      end
-
-      def get_nothing
-        lambda { |key| raise "should not have requested #{key}" }
-      end
-
-      def get_things(map)
-        lambda { |key|
-          raise "should not have requested #{key}" if !map.has_key?(key)
-          map[key]
-        }
-      end
-
-      def basic_evaluator
-        subject.new(get_nothing, get_nothing, logger)
-      end
-
-      def boolean_flag_with_rules(rules)
-        { key: 'feature', on: true, rules: rules, fallthrough: { variation: 0 }, variations: [ false, true ] }
-      end
-
-      def boolean_flag_with_clauses(clauses)
-        boolean_flag_with_rules([{ id: 'ruleid', clauses: clauses, variation: 1 }])
-      end
-
-      def make_user_matching_clause(user, attr)
-        {
-          attribute: attr.to_s,
-          op: :in,
-          values: [ user[attr.to_sym] ],
-          negate: false
-        }
-      end
-
-      def make_segment(key)
-        {
-          key: key,
-          included: [],
-          excluded: [],
-          salt: 'abcdef',
-          version: 1
-        }
-      end
-
-      def make_segment_match_clause(segment)
-        {
-          op: :segmentMatch,
-          values: [ segment[:key] ],
-          negate: false
-        }
-      end
-    end
-
-    RSpec.configure { |c| c.include EvaluatorSpecBase, :evaluator_spec_base => true }
-  end
-end

data/spec/impl/event_factory_spec.rb

@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
-require "spec_helper"
-
-describe LaunchDarkly::Impl::EventFactory do
-  subject { LaunchDarkly::Impl::EventFactory }
-
-  describe "#new_eval_event" do
-    let(:event_factory_without_reason) { subject.new(false) }
-    let(:user) { { 'key': 'userA' } }
-    let(:rule_with_experiment_rollout) { 
-      { id: 'ruleid',
-        clauses: [{ attribute: 'key', op: 'in', values: ['userkey'] }],
-        trackEvents: false,
-        rollout: { kind: 'experiment', salt: '', variations: [ { weight: 100000, variation: 0, untracked: false } ] }
-      }
-    }
-
-    let(:rule_with_rollout) { 
-      { id: 'ruleid',
-        trackEvents: false,
-        clauses: [{ attribute: 'key', op: 'in', values: ['userkey'] }],
-        rollout: { salt: '', variations: [ { weight: 100000, variation: 0, untracked: false } ] }
-      }
-    }
-
-    let(:fallthrough_with_rollout) {
-      { rollout: { kind: 'rollout', salt: '', variations: [ { weight: 100000, variation: 0, untracked: false } ], trackEventsFallthrough: false } }
-    }
-
-    let(:rule_reason) { LaunchDarkly::EvaluationReason::rule_match(0, 'ruleid') }
-    let(:rule_reason_with_experiment) { LaunchDarkly::EvaluationReason::rule_match(0, 'ruleid', true) }
-    let(:fallthrough_reason) { LaunchDarkly::EvaluationReason::fallthrough }
-    let(:fallthrough_reason_with_experiment) { LaunchDarkly::EvaluationReason::fallthrough(true) }
-
-    context "in_experiment is true" do
-      it "sets the reason and trackevents: true for rules" do
-        flag = createFlag('rule', rule_with_experiment_rollout)
-        detail = LaunchDarkly::EvaluationDetail.new(true, 0, rule_reason_with_experiment)
-        r = subject.new(false).new_eval_event(flag, user, detail, nil, nil)
-        expect(r[:trackEvents]).to eql(true)
-        expect(r[:reason].to_s).to eql("RULE_MATCH(0,ruleid,true)")
-      end
-
-      it "sets the reason and trackevents: true for the fallthrough" do
-        fallthrough_with_rollout[:kind] = 'experiment'
-        flag = createFlag('fallthrough', fallthrough_with_rollout)
-        detail = LaunchDarkly::EvaluationDetail.new(true, 0, fallthrough_reason_with_experiment)
-        r = subject.new(false).new_eval_event(flag, user, detail, nil, nil)
-        expect(r[:trackEvents]).to eql(true)
-        expect(r[:reason].to_s).to eql("FALLTHROUGH(true)")
-      end
-    end
-
-    context "in_experiment is false" do
-      it "sets the reason & trackEvents: true if rule has trackEvents set to true" do
-        rule_with_rollout[:trackEvents] = true
-        flag = createFlag('rule', rule_with_rollout)
-        detail = LaunchDarkly::EvaluationDetail.new(true, 0, rule_reason)
-        r = subject.new(false).new_eval_event(flag, user, detail, nil, nil)
-        expect(r[:trackEvents]).to eql(true)
-        expect(r[:reason].to_s).to eql("RULE_MATCH(0,ruleid)")
-      end
-
-      it "sets the reason & trackEvents: true if fallthrough has trackEventsFallthrough set to true" do
-        flag = createFlag('fallthrough', fallthrough_with_rollout)
-        flag[:trackEventsFallthrough] = true
-        detail = LaunchDarkly::EvaluationDetail.new(true, 0, fallthrough_reason)
-        r = subject.new(false).new_eval_event(flag, user, detail, nil, nil)
-        expect(r[:trackEvents]).to eql(true)
-        expect(r[:reason].to_s).to eql("FALLTHROUGH")
-      end
-
-      it "doesn't set the reason & trackEvents if rule has trackEvents set to false" do
-        flag = createFlag('rule', rule_with_rollout)
-        detail = LaunchDarkly::EvaluationDetail.new(true, 0, rule_reason)
-        r = subject.new(false).new_eval_event(flag, user, detail, nil, nil)
-        expect(r[:trackEvents]).to be_nil
-        expect(r[:reason]).to be_nil
-      end
-
-      it "doesn't set the reason & trackEvents if fallthrough has trackEventsFallthrough set to false" do
-        flag = createFlag('fallthrough', fallthrough_with_rollout)
-        detail = LaunchDarkly::EvaluationDetail.new(true, 0, fallthrough_reason)
-        r = subject.new(false).new_eval_event(flag, user, detail, nil, nil)
-        expect(r[:trackEvents]).to be_nil
-        expect(r[:reason]).to be_nil
-      end
-
-      it "sets trackEvents true and doesn't set the reason if flag[:trackEvents] = true" do
-        flag = createFlag('fallthrough', fallthrough_with_rollout)
-        flag[:trackEvents] = true
-        detail = LaunchDarkly::EvaluationDetail.new(true, 0, fallthrough_reason)
-        r = subject.new(false).new_eval_event(flag, user, detail, nil, nil)
-        expect(r[:trackEvents]).to eql(true)
-        expect(r[:reason]).to be_nil
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  def createFlag(kind, rule)
-    if kind == 'rule'
-      { key: 'feature', on: true, rules: [rule], fallthrough: { variation: 0 }, variations: [ false, true ] }
-    elsif kind == 'fallthrough'
-      { key: 'feature', on: true, fallthrough: rule, variations: [ false, true ] }
-    else
-      { key: 'feature', on: true, fallthrough: { variation: 0 }, variations: [ false, true ] }
-    end
-  end
-end