kuality-coeus 0.0.1 → 0.0.2

data/Gemfile

@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ source "http://rubygems.org"
 gem "rspec"
 gem "cucumber"
 gem "test-factory", ">=0.1.3"
-gem "watir-webdriver", ">=0.6.1"
+gem "watir-webdriver", ">=0.6.4"

data/Gemfile.lock

@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 GEM
   remote: http://rubygems.org/
   specs:
-    addressable (2.3.2)
-    builder (3.0.4)
+    builder (3.1.4)
     childprocess (0.3.6)
       ffi (~> 1.0, >= 1.0.6)
     cucumber (1.2.1)
@@ -11,31 +10,30 @@ GEM
       gherkin (~> 2.11.0)
       json (>= 1.4.6)
     diff-lcs (1.1.3)
-    ffi (1.1.5)
+    ffi (1.2.0)
     gherkin (2.11.5)
       json (>= 1.4.6)
-    json (1.7.5)
-    libwebsocket (0.1.5)
-      addressable
-    multi_json (1.3.7)
-    rspec (2.11.0)
-      rspec-core (~> 2.11.0)
-      rspec-expectations (~> 2.11.0)
-      rspec-mocks (~> 2.11.0)
-    rspec-core (2.11.1)
-    rspec-expectations (2.11.3)
+    json (1.7.6)
+    multi_json (1.5.0)
+    rspec (2.12.0)
+      rspec-core (~> 2.12.0)
+      rspec-expectations (~> 2.12.0)
+      rspec-mocks (~> 2.12.0)
+    rspec-core (2.12.2)
+    rspec-expectations (2.12.1)
       diff-lcs (~> 1.1.3)
-    rspec-mocks (2.11.3)
+    rspec-mocks (2.12.1)
     rubyzip (0.9.9)
-    selenium-webdriver (2.26.0)
+    selenium-webdriver (2.32.1)
       childprocess (>= 0.2.5)
-      libwebsocket (~> 0.1.3)
       multi_json (~> 1.0)
       rubyzip
+      websocket (~> 1.0.4)
     test-factory (0.1.3)
       watir-webdriver (>= 0.6.1)
-    watir-webdriver (0.6.1)
+    watir-webdriver (0.6.4)
       selenium-webdriver (>= 2.18.0)
+    websocket (1.0.6)
 
 PLATFORMS
   ruby
@@ -44,4 +42,4 @@ DEPENDENCIES
   cucumber
   rspec
   test-factory (>= 0.1.3)
-  watir-webdriver (>= 0.6.1)
+  watir-webdriver (>= 0.6.4)

data/chromedriver.log

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+[0.001][INFO]:      ChromeDriver 21.0.1180.4 /Users/abrahamheward/.rvm/bin/chromedriver
+[0.219][FINE]:      Initializing session with capabilities {
+   "browserName": "chrome",
+   "chrome.detach": true,
+   "chromeOptions": {
+      "detach": true
+   },
+   "cssSelectorsEnabled": true,
+   "javascriptEnabled": true,
+   "nativeEvents": false,
+   "platform": "ANY",
+   "rotatable": false,
+   "takesScreenshot": false,
+   "version": ""
+}
+
+[0.221][INFO]:      Using named testing interface
+[0.751][INFO]:      Connected to Chrome successfully. Version: 29.0.1547.41
+[0.755][FINE]:      Command received (/session/9e5aca74a1158f039ef697bc3a14cbd4)
+[0.755][FINE]:      Command finished (/session/9e5aca74a1158f039ef697bc3a14cbd4) with response {
+   "sessionId": "9e5aca74a1158f039ef697bc3a14cbd4",
+   "status": 0,
+   "value": {
+      "acceptSslCerts": false,
+      "applicationCacheEnabled": false,
+      "browserConnectionEnabled": false,
+      "browserName": "chrome",
+      "chrome.chromedriverVersion": "21.0.1180.4",
+      "chrome.nativeEvents": false,
+      "cssSelectorsEnabled": true,
+      "databaseEnabled": false,
+      "handlesAlerts": true,
+      "javascriptEnabled": true,
+      "locationContextEnabled": false,
+      "nativeEvents": true,
+      "platform": "mac",
+      "rotatable": false,
+      "takesScreenshot": true,
+      "version": "29.0.1547.41",
+      "webStorageEnabled": true
+   }
+}
+
+[0.756][FINE]:      Command received (/session/9e5aca74a1158f039ef697bc3a14cbd4/window_handle)
+[0.756][FINER]:     Waiting for all views to stop loading...
+[0.757][FINER]:     Done waiting for all views to stop loading

data/features/grants_gov/grants_gov_forms/code_and_form_mapping.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Feature: Opportunity Code and S2S Form Mapping
+
+  As a researcher, I want the ability to select various grants.gov and research.gov
+  opportunities. These opportunities will each have unique forms that I can then choose to
+  attach to my proposal document.
+
+  ##Note: This mapping of opportunity codes to expected forms was inspired by a mapping chart provided to
+  ##rSmart QA by Pat Slabach. Further investigation is necessary to ensure mapping accuracy.
+
+  Background: Logged in with a proposal creator
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
+    And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
+    And   initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
+
+  Scenario Outline: Selecting opportunities brings different forms
+    Given I initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
+    When  I add the Grants.Gov opportunity id of <Form Name> to the proposal
+    Then  the s2s form attachment options should be appropriate to the opportunity
+
+    Examples:
+     | Form Name               |
+     | RR-FORMFAMILY-004-2010  |
+     | RR-FORMFAMILY-009-2010  |
+     | CSS-120809-SF424RR-V12  |
+     | SK07132010SCR9020-2     |
+     | PA-B1-K08               |

data/features/grants_gov/grants_gov_forms/forms_validation.feature

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Feature: S2S Form Error Validation

data/features/grants_gov/grants_gov_forms/s2s_questionnaire.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Feature: S2S Questionnaire Population and Functionality
+
+  ##Consider a rewrite
+  As a Researcher, there are certain forms that I can attach to a proposal that will result in
+  the population of additional Questionnaires. I want the ability to complete these questionnaires,
+  and to manage each responses' effects on my proposal.
+
+  Scenario: Initiate a proposal with PHS forms attached
+  Given I initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
+  And   add the Grants.Gov opportunity id of PA-B2-ALL to the proposal
+  When  I attach the PHS training and fellowship forms to the proposal
+  Then  the PHS training and fellowship questionnaires should appear in the proposal
+
+  Scenario: Attach the PHS Fellowship and Training forms, and complete the questionnaires
+  Given I initiate a proposal with NIH as the sponsor
+  And   add the Grants.Gov opportunity id of PA-B2-ALL to the proposal
+  When  I attach the PHS training and fellowship forms to the proposal
+  And   complete their respective questionnaires
+  Then  the questionnaire titles should indicate that the questionnaires have been completed

data/features/grants_gov/s2s_submission.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Feature: Submitting Proposals via s2s to Grants.gov
+
+  As a researcher, I want the ability to submit my completed proposals
+  through to grants.gov
+
+  Background: Logged in with a proposal creator; have other necessary user
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
+    And   a user exists that can be a PI for Grants.gov proposals
+    And   an AOR user exists
+    And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
+
+  Scenario Outline: Submit a proposal to Grants.gov with various sponsors and opportunities
+    Given I initiate a proposal with <Sponsor> as the sponsor
+    And   add the <Provider> opportunity id of <Opportunity> to the proposal
+    And   add the <Provider> user as the proposal's PI
+    And   set valid credit splits for the proposal
+    And   add and mark complete all the required attachments for an <Sponsor> proposal
+    And   create, finalize, and mark complete a budget version for the proposal
+    And   complete the required custom fields on the proposal
+    And   answer the S2S questions
+    And   submit the proposal
+    And   log in with the AOR user
+    When  I submit the proposal to S2S
+    Then  the S2S tab's submission details will say the proposal is submitted
+    And   within a couple minutes the submission status will be updated
+
+  Examples:
+    | Provider   | Sponsor | Opportunity                  |
+    | Grants.Gov | NIH     | RR-TEST-NIH-FORMS2           |
+    | Grants.Gov | NIH     | RR-TEST-NIH-FORMS2-With-CFDA |

data/features/grants_gov/s2s_validation.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+Feature: Validating content of s2s proposals
+
+  As someone who submits proposals to the federal government for grant money
+  I want to ensure the proposals are free of errors prior to submission
+
+  Background: Logged in with a proposal creator; initiate a proposal for grants.gov
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
+    And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
+    And   initiate a proposal with a 'Federal' sponsor type
+    And   add the Grants.Gov opportunity id of PA-B2-ALL to the proposal
+
+  Scenario: Adding the opportunity
+    Then  the opportunity details should appear on the page
+    And   the 'remove opportunity' button should be present
+
+  Scenario: Enter wrong revision type information
+    Given I select a revision type of 'Increase Award'
+    And   enter a 'revision specify' description
+    When  I save the proposal
+    Then  an error message appears saying that I need to select the 'Other' revision type
+
+  Scenario: Don't enter S2S Revision Type for a revision proposal
+    Given I set the proposal type to 'Revision'
+    When  I go to the proposal's S2S page
+    And   save the proposal
+    Then  an error message appears saying a revision type must be selected
+
+  Scenario: Select 'Change' for a new S2S proposal
+    Given I select a submission type of 'Change/Corrected Application'
+    When  I activate a validation check
+    Then  one of the validation errors should say that an original proposal ID is needed
+
+  Scenario: Resubmission proposal type selected inappropriately
+    Given I set the proposal type to either 'Resubmission', 'Renewal', or 'Continuation'
+    When  I activate a validation check
+    Then  one of the validation errors should say that the prior award number is required

data/features/proposal_development/create_budget_versions.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+Feature: Creating/Editing Budget Versions in Proposal Documents
+
+  As a researcher I want to be able to create budgets in my proposals
+  so that I can calculate how much the proposal should be for.
+
+  Background: Create a Budget Version for a 5-year proposal
+    Given I'm logged in with admin
+    And   I initiate a 5-year project proposal
+    And   create a budget version for the proposal
+
+  Scenario: System warns about budget periods when proposal dates change
+    When  I push the proposal's project start date ahead a year
+    Then  opening the Budget Version will display a warning about the date change
+    And   correcting the Budget Version date will remove the warning
+
+  Scenario: Copied budget periods have expected values
+    Given I enter dollar amounts for all the budget periods
+    When  I copy the budget version (all periods)
+    Then  the copied budget's values are all as expected
+
+  Scenario: "Default Periods" returns budget periods to a zeroed state
+    Given I delete one of the budget periods
+    And   enter dollar amounts for all the budget periods
+    And   change the date range for one of the periods
+    When  I select the default periods for the budget version
+    Then  all budget periods get recreated, zeroed, and given default date ranges
+
+  Scenario: Only one budget version can be 'final'
+    Given I finalize the budget version
+    When  I copy the budget version (all periods)
+    Then  I see an error that only one version can be final

data/features/proposal_development/create_proposal.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+Feature: Creating proposals
+
+  As a researcher I want the ability to create a proposal, so that I can get funding for my research.
+
+  Background: Logged in as admin
+      Given I'm logged in with admin
+
+    Scenario: Attempt to save a proposal missing a required field
+      When  I initiate a proposal but miss a required field
+      Then  I should see an error that says the field is required
+    @test
+    Scenario: Attempt to save a proposal with an invalid sponsor code
+      When  I initiate a proposal with an invalid sponsor code
+      Then  I should see an error that says a valid sponsor code is required
+
+    Scenario: Successful initiation of proposal with federal sponsor type
+      When  I initiate a proposal with a 'Federal' sponsor type
+      Then  The S2S tab should become available
+
+    Scenario: Successful submission of a Private Profit proposal document into routing
+      When  I complete a valid simple proposal for a 'Private Profit' organization
+      And   submit the proposal
+      Then  The proposal should immediately have a status of 'Approval Pending'
+      And   The proposal route log's 'Actions Taken' should include 'COMPLETED'
+      And   The proposal's 'Future Action Requests' should include 'PENDING APPROVE' for the principal investigator

data/features/proposal_development/key_personnel_validations.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+Feature: Key Personnel Validations
+
+  As a researcher I want to know if there are problems
+  with my proposal's key personnel so that I can fix them
+  before I submit the proposal
+
+  Background: The admin user initiates a proposal
+    Given   I'm logged in with admin
+    And     I initiate a proposal
+
+  Scenario Outline: I should see an error when I add Credit Split percentages above 100 or less than 0
+    When  I add a Principal Investigator with a <Type> credit split of <Value>
+    Then  a key personnel error should say the credit split is not a valid percentage
+
+    Examples:
+    | Type           | Value  |
+    | Responsibility | 100.01 |
+    | Financial      | 1000   |
+    | Recognition    | -0.01  |
+
+  Scenario: I should see an error when I add a key person without a specified proposal role
+    When  I add a key person without a key person role
+    Then  a key personnel error should say a key person role is required
+
+  Scenario: Error when adding a co-investigator without a unit
+    When  I add a co-investigator without a unit
+    Then  a key personnel error should say the co-investigator requires at least one unit
+
+  Scenario: Error when adding multiple principle investigators
+    When  I try to add two Principal Investigators
+    Then  a key personnel error should say only one PI is allowed
+
+  Scenario: Error when adding a key person with an invalid unit
+    When  I add a key person with an invalid unit type
+    Then  a key personnel error should say to select a valid unit
+
+  Scenario: Error when adding the same user as a PI and Co-Investigator
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Unassigned'
+    When  I add the Unassigned user as a Principal Investigator to the key personnel proposal roles
+    And   I add the Unassigned user as a Co-Investigator to the key personnel proposal roles
+    Then  there should be an error that says the Unassigned user already holds investigator role

data/features/proposal_development/proposal_actions_validations.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+Feature: Proposal Actions Validations
+
+  As a researcher I want to know if my development proposal contains any errors
+  so that I can fix them prior to submitting my proposal
+
+  Background: Logged in with a proposal creator user
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
+    And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
+
+    Scenario: A PI has not been added to the proposal
+      Given I initiate a proposal
+      And   the proposal has no principal investigator
+      When  I activate a validation check
+      Then  a validation error should say there is no principal investigator
+      And   checking the key personnel page shows an error that says there is no principal investigator
+
+    Scenario: The proposal questions have not each been answered
+      Given I initiate a proposal
+      And   I do not answer my proposal questions
+      When  I activate a validation check
+      Then  a validation error should say proposal questions were not answered
+      And   checking the questions page shows an error that says proposal questions were not answered
+
+    Scenario: Sponsor deadline date is missing
+      Given I initiate a proposal without a sponsor deadline date
+      When  I activate a validation check
+      Then  a validation error should say sponsor deadline date not entered
+      And   checking the proposal page shows an error that says sponsor deadline date not entered
+
+    Scenario: A co-investigator is added but not certified
+      Given I initiate a proposal with an un-certified Co-Investigator
+      When  I activate a validation check
+      Then  a validation error should say the investigator needs to be certified
+      And   checking the key personnel page shows a proposal person certification error that says the investigator needs to be certified
+
+    Scenario: A PI is added but not certified
+      Given I initiate a proposal with an un-certified Principal Investigator
+      When  I activate a validation check
+      Then  a validation error should say the principal needs to be certified
+      And   checking the key personnel page shows a proposal person certification error that says the investigator needs to be certified
+
+    Scenario: A Key Person is added but not certified
+      Given I initiate a proposal where the un-certified key person has certification questions
+      When  I activate a validation check
+      Then  a validation error should say the key person needs to be certified
+      And   checking the key personnel page shows a proposal person certification error that says the investigator needs to be certified

data/features/proposal_development/proposal_permissions.feature

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+Feature: Permissions in a Proposal
+
+  As a Proposal Aggregator, I want to be able to assign others permissions to a proposal,
+  to allow them to work on the proposal with me, and to control what actions
+  they are capable of performing with it.
+
+  Background: The admin user initiates a proposal
+    Given I'm logged in with admin
+    And   I initiate a proposal
+
+  Scenario: The proposal initiator is automatically an aggregator
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
+    And   I log in with the Proposal Creator user
+    When  I visit the proposal's Permissions page
+    Then  the Proposal Creator user is listed as an Aggregator in the proposal permissions
+
+  Scenario Outline: A Proposal Aggregator can assign various roles to a proposal documents permissions
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Unassigned'
+    When  I assign the Unassigned user as a <Role> in the proposal permissions
+    Then  the Unassigned user can access the proposal
+    And   their proposal permissions allow them to <Permissions>
+
+    Examples:
+    | Role                     | Permissions                                    |
+    | Narrative Writer         | only update the Abstracts and Attachments page |
+    | Aggregator               | edit all parts of the proposal                 |
+    | Budget Creator           | only update the budget                         |
+    | Delete Proposal          | delete the proposal                            |
+    | Viewer                   | only read the proposal                         |
+
+  Scenario Outline: Proposal permissions are not passed onto future proposals initiated by the same creator
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Unassigned'
+    And   I assign the Unassigned user as a <Role> in the proposal permissions
+    When  I initiate a second proposal
+    Then  the Unassigned user should not be listed as a <Role> in the second proposal
+
+  Examples:
+    | Role             |
+    | Viewer           |
+    | Budget Creator   |
+    | Narrative Writer |
+    | Aggregator       |
+    | approver         |
+    | Delete Proposal  |
+
+  Scenario: Users who are assigned the Aggregator role cannot be assigned additional roles
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Unassigned'
+    And   I assign the Unassigned user as an aggregator in the proposal permissions
+    When  I attempt to add an additional proposal role to the Aggregator user
+    Then  there should be an error message that says not to select other roles alongside aggregator
+
+  Scenario: A proposal document cannot have multiple users assigned to the Aggregator role
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Proposal Creator'
+    And   I assign the Proposal Creator user as an aggregator in the proposal permissions
+    When  I attempt to add an additional proposal role to the Aggregator user
+    Then  there should be an error message that says not to select other roles alongside aggregator
+
+  Scenario Outline: Users with the appropriate permissions can edit proposals that have been recalled for revisions
+    Given a user exists with the system role: 'Unassigned'
+    And   assign the Unassigned user as a <Role> in the proposal permissions
+    And   complete the proposal
+    And   submit the proposal
+    When  I recall the proposal for revisions
+    Then  the Unassigned user can access the proposal
+    And   their proposal permissions allow them to <Permissions>
+
+  Examples:
+    | Role                | Permissions                                    |
+    | Narrative Writer    | only update the Abstracts and Attachments page |
+    | Aggregator          | edit all parts of the proposal                 |
+    | Budget Creator      | only update the budget                         |
+    | Delete Proposal     | delete the proposal                            |
+    | Viewer              | only read the proposal                         |