json 2.0.3 → 2.5.1
Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
- checksums.yaml +5 -5
- data/CHANGES.md +66 -0
- data/Gemfile +1 -3
- data/LICENSE +56 -0
- data/README.md +54 -21
- data/VERSION +1 -1
- data/ext/json/ext/fbuffer/fbuffer.h +0 -3
- data/ext/json/ext/generator/generator.c +229 -54
- data/ext/json/ext/generator/generator.h +5 -3
- data/ext/json/ext/parser/extconf.rb +25 -0
- data/ext/json/ext/parser/parser.c +180 -85
- data/ext/json/ext/parser/parser.h +2 -0
- data/ext/json/ext/parser/parser.rl +104 -9
- data/ext/json/extconf.rb +1 -0
- data/json.gemspec +0 -0
- data/lib/json/add/bigdecimal.rb +2 -2
- data/lib/json/add/complex.rb +2 -3
- data/lib/json/add/ostruct.rb +1 -1
- data/lib/json/add/rational.rb +2 -3
- data/lib/json/add/regexp.rb +2 -2
- data/lib/json/add/set.rb +29 -0
- data/lib/json/common.rb +372 -125
- data/lib/json/pure/generator.rb +31 -10
- data/lib/json/pure/parser.rb +35 -5
- data/lib/json/version.rb +1 -1
- data/lib/json.rb +549 -29
- data/tests/fixtures/fail29.json +1 -0
- data/tests/fixtures/fail30.json +1 -0
- data/tests/fixtures/fail31.json +1 -0
- data/tests/fixtures/fail32.json +1 -0
- data/tests/json_addition_test.rb +6 -0
- data/tests/json_common_interface_test.rb +47 -4
- data/tests/json_encoding_test.rb +2 -0
- data/tests/json_fixtures_test.rb +9 -1
- data/tests/json_generator_test.rb +30 -8
- data/tests/json_parser_test.rb +43 -12
- data/tests/lib/core_assertions.rb +763 -0
- data/tests/lib/envutil.rb +365 -0
- data/tests/lib/find_executable.rb +22 -0
- data/tests/lib/helper.rb +4 -0
- data/tests/ractor_test.rb +30 -0
- data/tests/test_helper.rb +3 -7
- metadata +31 -44
- data/.gitignore +0 -17
- data/.travis.yml +0 -19
- data/README-json-jruby.md +0 -33
- data/Rakefile +0 -408
- data/data/example.json +0 -1
- data/data/index.html +0 -38
- data/data/prototype.js +0 -4184
- data/diagrams/.keep +0 -0
- data/install.rb +0 -23
- data/java/src/json/ext/ByteListTranscoder.java +0 -166
- data/java/src/json/ext/Generator.java +0 -443
- data/java/src/json/ext/GeneratorMethods.java +0 -231
- data/java/src/json/ext/GeneratorService.java +0 -42
- data/java/src/json/ext/GeneratorState.java +0 -490
- data/java/src/json/ext/OptionsReader.java +0 -113
- data/java/src/json/ext/Parser.java +0 -2347
- data/java/src/json/ext/Parser.rl +0 -878
- data/java/src/json/ext/ParserService.java +0 -34
- data/java/src/json/ext/RuntimeInfo.java +0 -116
- data/java/src/json/ext/StringDecoder.java +0 -166
- data/java/src/json/ext/StringEncoder.java +0 -111
- data/java/src/json/ext/Utils.java +0 -88
- data/json-java.gemspec +0 -38
- data/json_pure.gemspec +0 -38
- data/references/rfc7159.txt +0 -899
- data/tools/diff.sh +0 -18
- data/tools/fuzz.rb +0 -131
- data/tools/server.rb +0 -62
data/references/rfc7159.txt
DELETED
@@ -1,899 +0,0 @@
|
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
4
|
-
|
5
|
-
|
6
|
-
|
7
|
-
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) T. Bray, Ed.
|
8
|
-
Request for Comments: 7159 Google, Inc.
|
9
|
-
Obsoletes: 4627, 7158 March 2014
|
10
|
-
Category: Standards Track
|
11
|
-
ISSN: 2070-1721
|
12
|
-
|
13
|
-
|
14
|
-
The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format
|
15
|
-
|
16
|
-
Abstract
|
17
|
-
|
18
|
-
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is a lightweight, text-based,
|
19
|
-
language-independent data interchange format. It was derived from
|
20
|
-
the ECMAScript Programming Language Standard. JSON defines a small
|
21
|
-
set of formatting rules for the portable representation of structured
|
22
|
-
data.
|
23
|
-
|
24
|
-
This document removes inconsistencies with other specifications of
|
25
|
-
JSON, repairs specification errors, and offers experience-based
|
26
|
-
interoperability guidance.
|
27
|
-
|
28
|
-
Status of This Memo
|
29
|
-
|
30
|
-
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
|
31
|
-
|
32
|
-
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
|
33
|
-
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
|
34
|
-
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
|
35
|
-
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
|
36
|
-
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
|
37
|
-
|
38
|
-
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
|
39
|
-
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
|
40
|
-
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7159.
|
41
|
-
|
42
|
-
|
43
|
-
|
44
|
-
|
45
|
-
|
46
|
-
|
47
|
-
|
48
|
-
|
49
|
-
|
50
|
-
|
51
|
-
|
52
|
-
|
53
|
-
|
54
|
-
|
55
|
-
|
56
|
-
|
57
|
-
|
58
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 1]
|
59
|
-
|
60
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
61
|
-
|
62
|
-
|
63
|
-
Copyright Notice
|
64
|
-
|
65
|
-
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
|
66
|
-
document authors. All rights reserved.
|
67
|
-
|
68
|
-
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
|
69
|
-
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
|
70
|
-
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
|
71
|
-
publication of this document. Please review these documents
|
72
|
-
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
|
73
|
-
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
|
74
|
-
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
|
75
|
-
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
|
76
|
-
described in the Simplified BSD License.
|
77
|
-
|
78
|
-
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
|
79
|
-
Contributions published or made publicly available before November
|
80
|
-
10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
|
81
|
-
material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
|
82
|
-
modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
|
83
|
-
Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
|
84
|
-
the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
|
85
|
-
outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
|
86
|
-
not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
|
87
|
-
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
|
88
|
-
than English.
|
89
|
-
|
90
|
-
|
91
|
-
|
92
|
-
|
93
|
-
|
94
|
-
|
95
|
-
|
96
|
-
|
97
|
-
|
98
|
-
|
99
|
-
|
100
|
-
|
101
|
-
|
102
|
-
|
103
|
-
|
104
|
-
|
105
|
-
|
106
|
-
|
107
|
-
|
108
|
-
|
109
|
-
|
110
|
-
|
111
|
-
|
112
|
-
|
113
|
-
|
114
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 2]
|
115
|
-
|
116
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
117
|
-
|
118
|
-
|
119
|
-
Table of Contents
|
120
|
-
|
121
|
-
1. Introduction ....................................................3
|
122
|
-
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document ..........................4
|
123
|
-
1.2. Specifications of JSON .....................................4
|
124
|
-
1.3. Introduction to This Revision ..............................4
|
125
|
-
2. JSON Grammar ....................................................4
|
126
|
-
3. Values ..........................................................5
|
127
|
-
4. Objects .........................................................6
|
128
|
-
5. Arrays ..........................................................6
|
129
|
-
6. Numbers .........................................................6
|
130
|
-
7. Strings .........................................................8
|
131
|
-
8. String and Character Issues .....................................9
|
132
|
-
8.1. Character Encoding .........................................9
|
133
|
-
8.2. Unicode Characters .........................................9
|
134
|
-
8.3. String Comparison ..........................................9
|
135
|
-
9. Parsers ........................................................10
|
136
|
-
10. Generators ....................................................10
|
137
|
-
11. IANA Considerations ...........................................10
|
138
|
-
12. Security Considerations .......................................11
|
139
|
-
13. Examples ......................................................12
|
140
|
-
14. Contributors ..................................................13
|
141
|
-
15. References ....................................................13
|
142
|
-
15.1. Normative References .....................................13
|
143
|
-
15.2. Informative References ...................................13
|
144
|
-
Appendix A. Changes from RFC 4627 .................................15
|
145
|
-
|
146
|
-
1. Introduction
|
147
|
-
|
148
|
-
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is a text format for the
|
149
|
-
serialization of structured data. It is derived from the object
|
150
|
-
literals of JavaScript, as defined in the ECMAScript Programming
|
151
|
-
Language Standard, Third Edition [ECMA-262].
|
152
|
-
|
153
|
-
JSON can represent four primitive types (strings, numbers, booleans,
|
154
|
-
and null) and two structured types (objects and arrays).
|
155
|
-
|
156
|
-
A string is a sequence of zero or more Unicode characters [UNICODE].
|
157
|
-
Note that this citation references the latest version of Unicode
|
158
|
-
rather than a specific release. It is not expected that future
|
159
|
-
changes in the UNICODE specification will impact the syntax of JSON.
|
160
|
-
|
161
|
-
An object is an unordered collection of zero or more name/value
|
162
|
-
pairs, where a name is a string and a value is a string, number,
|
163
|
-
boolean, null, object, or array.
|
164
|
-
|
165
|
-
An array is an ordered sequence of zero or more values.
|
166
|
-
|
167
|
-
|
168
|
-
|
169
|
-
|
170
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 3]
|
171
|
-
|
172
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
173
|
-
|
174
|
-
|
175
|
-
The terms "object" and "array" come from the conventions of
|
176
|
-
JavaScript.
|
177
|
-
|
178
|
-
JSON's design goals were for it to be minimal, portable, textual, and
|
179
|
-
a subset of JavaScript.
|
180
|
-
|
181
|
-
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document
|
182
|
-
|
183
|
-
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
184
|
-
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
|
185
|
-
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
|
186
|
-
|
187
|
-
The grammatical rules in this document are to be interpreted as
|
188
|
-
described in [RFC5234].
|
189
|
-
|
190
|
-
1.2. Specifications of JSON
|
191
|
-
|
192
|
-
This document updates [RFC4627], which describes JSON and registers
|
193
|
-
the media type "application/json".
|
194
|
-
|
195
|
-
A description of JSON in ECMAScript terms appears in Version 5.1 of
|
196
|
-
the ECMAScript specification [ECMA-262], Section 15.12. JSON is also
|
197
|
-
described in [ECMA-404].
|
198
|
-
|
199
|
-
All of the specifications of JSON syntax agree on the syntactic
|
200
|
-
elements of the language.
|
201
|
-
|
202
|
-
1.3. Introduction to This Revision
|
203
|
-
|
204
|
-
In the years since the publication of RFC 4627, JSON has found very
|
205
|
-
wide use. This experience has revealed certain patterns, which,
|
206
|
-
while allowed by its specifications, have caused interoperability
|
207
|
-
problems.
|
208
|
-
|
209
|
-
Also, a small number of errata have been reported (see RFC Errata IDs
|
210
|
-
607 [Err607] and 3607 [Err3607]).
|
211
|
-
|
212
|
-
This document's goal is to apply the errata, remove inconsistencies
|
213
|
-
with other specifications of JSON, and highlight practices that can
|
214
|
-
lead to interoperability problems.
|
215
|
-
|
216
|
-
2. JSON Grammar
|
217
|
-
|
218
|
-
A JSON text is a sequence of tokens. The set of tokens includes six
|
219
|
-
structural characters, strings, numbers, and three literal names.
|
220
|
-
|
221
|
-
A JSON text is a serialized value. Note that certain previous
|
222
|
-
specifications of JSON constrained a JSON text to be an object or an
|
223
|
-
|
224
|
-
|
225
|
-
|
226
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 4]
|
227
|
-
|
228
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
229
|
-
|
230
|
-
|
231
|
-
array. Implementations that generate only objects or arrays where a
|
232
|
-
JSON text is called for will be interoperable in the sense that all
|
233
|
-
implementations will accept these as conforming JSON texts.
|
234
|
-
|
235
|
-
JSON-text = ws value ws
|
236
|
-
|
237
|
-
These are the six structural characters:
|
238
|
-
|
239
|
-
begin-array = ws %x5B ws ; [ left square bracket
|
240
|
-
|
241
|
-
begin-object = ws %x7B ws ; { left curly bracket
|
242
|
-
|
243
|
-
end-array = ws %x5D ws ; ] right square bracket
|
244
|
-
|
245
|
-
end-object = ws %x7D ws ; } right curly bracket
|
246
|
-
|
247
|
-
name-separator = ws %x3A ws ; : colon
|
248
|
-
|
249
|
-
value-separator = ws %x2C ws ; , comma
|
250
|
-
|
251
|
-
Insignificant whitespace is allowed before or after any of the six
|
252
|
-
structural characters.
|
253
|
-
|
254
|
-
ws = *(
|
255
|
-
%x20 / ; Space
|
256
|
-
%x09 / ; Horizontal tab
|
257
|
-
%x0A / ; Line feed or New line
|
258
|
-
%x0D ) ; Carriage return
|
259
|
-
|
260
|
-
3. Values
|
261
|
-
|
262
|
-
A JSON value MUST be an object, array, number, or string, or one of
|
263
|
-
the following three literal names:
|
264
|
-
|
265
|
-
false null true
|
266
|
-
|
267
|
-
The literal names MUST be lowercase. No other literal names are
|
268
|
-
allowed.
|
269
|
-
|
270
|
-
value = false / null / true / object / array / number / string
|
271
|
-
|
272
|
-
false = %x66.61.6c.73.65 ; false
|
273
|
-
|
274
|
-
null = %x6e.75.6c.6c ; null
|
275
|
-
|
276
|
-
true = %x74.72.75.65 ; true
|
277
|
-
|
278
|
-
|
279
|
-
|
280
|
-
|
281
|
-
|
282
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 5]
|
283
|
-
|
284
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
285
|
-
|
286
|
-
|
287
|
-
4. Objects
|
288
|
-
|
289
|
-
An object structure is represented as a pair of curly brackets
|
290
|
-
surrounding zero or more name/value pairs (or members). A name is a
|
291
|
-
string. A single colon comes after each name, separating the name
|
292
|
-
from the value. A single comma separates a value from a following
|
293
|
-
name. The names within an object SHOULD be unique.
|
294
|
-
|
295
|
-
object = begin-object [ member *( value-separator member ) ]
|
296
|
-
end-object
|
297
|
-
|
298
|
-
member = string name-separator value
|
299
|
-
|
300
|
-
An object whose names are all unique is interoperable in the sense
|
301
|
-
that all software implementations receiving that object will agree on
|
302
|
-
the name-value mappings. When the names within an object are not
|
303
|
-
unique, the behavior of software that receives such an object is
|
304
|
-
unpredictable. Many implementations report the last name/value pair
|
305
|
-
only. Other implementations report an error or fail to parse the
|
306
|
-
object, and some implementations report all of the name/value pairs,
|
307
|
-
including duplicates.
|
308
|
-
|
309
|
-
JSON parsing libraries have been observed to differ as to whether or
|
310
|
-
not they make the ordering of object members visible to calling
|
311
|
-
software. Implementations whose behavior does not depend on member
|
312
|
-
ordering will be interoperable in the sense that they will not be
|
313
|
-
affected by these differences.
|
314
|
-
|
315
|
-
5. Arrays
|
316
|
-
|
317
|
-
An array structure is represented as square brackets surrounding zero
|
318
|
-
or more values (or elements). Elements are separated by commas.
|
319
|
-
|
320
|
-
array = begin-array [ value *( value-separator value ) ] end-array
|
321
|
-
|
322
|
-
There is no requirement that the values in an array be of the same
|
323
|
-
type.
|
324
|
-
|
325
|
-
6. Numbers
|
326
|
-
|
327
|
-
The representation of numbers is similar to that used in most
|
328
|
-
programming languages. A number is represented in base 10 using
|
329
|
-
decimal digits. It contains an integer component that may be
|
330
|
-
prefixed with an optional minus sign, which may be followed by a
|
331
|
-
fraction part and/or an exponent part. Leading zeros are not
|
332
|
-
allowed.
|
333
|
-
|
334
|
-
A fraction part is a decimal point followed by one or more digits.
|
335
|
-
|
336
|
-
|
337
|
-
|
338
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 6]
|
339
|
-
|
340
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
341
|
-
|
342
|
-
|
343
|
-
An exponent part begins with the letter E in upper or lower case,
|
344
|
-
which may be followed by a plus or minus sign. The E and optional
|
345
|
-
sign are followed by one or more digits.
|
346
|
-
|
347
|
-
Numeric values that cannot be represented in the grammar below (such
|
348
|
-
as Infinity and NaN) are not permitted.
|
349
|
-
|
350
|
-
number = [ minus ] int [ frac ] [ exp ]
|
351
|
-
|
352
|
-
decimal-point = %x2E ; .
|
353
|
-
|
354
|
-
digit1-9 = %x31-39 ; 1-9
|
355
|
-
|
356
|
-
e = %x65 / %x45 ; e E
|
357
|
-
|
358
|
-
exp = e [ minus / plus ] 1*DIGIT
|
359
|
-
|
360
|
-
frac = decimal-point 1*DIGIT
|
361
|
-
|
362
|
-
int = zero / ( digit1-9 *DIGIT )
|
363
|
-
|
364
|
-
minus = %x2D ; -
|
365
|
-
|
366
|
-
plus = %x2B ; +
|
367
|
-
|
368
|
-
zero = %x30 ; 0
|
369
|
-
|
370
|
-
This specification allows implementations to set limits on the range
|
371
|
-
and precision of numbers accepted. Since software that implements
|
372
|
-
IEEE 754-2008 binary64 (double precision) numbers [IEEE754] is
|
373
|
-
generally available and widely used, good interoperability can be
|
374
|
-
achieved by implementations that expect no more precision or range
|
375
|
-
than these provide, in the sense that implementations will
|
376
|
-
approximate JSON numbers within the expected precision. A JSON
|
377
|
-
number such as 1E400 or 3.141592653589793238462643383279 may indicate
|
378
|
-
potential interoperability problems, since it suggests that the
|
379
|
-
software that created it expects receiving software to have greater
|
380
|
-
capabilities for numeric magnitude and precision than is widely
|
381
|
-
available.
|
382
|
-
|
383
|
-
Note that when such software is used, numbers that are integers and
|
384
|
-
are in the range [-(2**53)+1, (2**53)-1] are interoperable in the
|
385
|
-
sense that implementations will agree exactly on their numeric
|
386
|
-
values.
|
387
|
-
|
388
|
-
|
389
|
-
|
390
|
-
|
391
|
-
|
392
|
-
|
393
|
-
|
394
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 7]
|
395
|
-
|
396
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
397
|
-
|
398
|
-
|
399
|
-
7. Strings
|
400
|
-
|
401
|
-
The representation of strings is similar to conventions used in the C
|
402
|
-
family of programming languages. A string begins and ends with
|
403
|
-
quotation marks. All Unicode characters may be placed within the
|
404
|
-
quotation marks, except for the characters that must be escaped:
|
405
|
-
quotation mark, reverse solidus, and the control characters (U+0000
|
406
|
-
through U+001F).
|
407
|
-
|
408
|
-
Any character may be escaped. If the character is in the Basic
|
409
|
-
Multilingual Plane (U+0000 through U+FFFF), then it may be
|
410
|
-
represented as a six-character sequence: a reverse solidus, followed
|
411
|
-
by the lowercase letter u, followed by four hexadecimal digits that
|
412
|
-
encode the character's code point. The hexadecimal letters A though
|
413
|
-
F can be upper or lower case. So, for example, a string containing
|
414
|
-
only a single reverse solidus character may be represented as
|
415
|
-
"\u005C".
|
416
|
-
|
417
|
-
Alternatively, there are two-character sequence escape
|
418
|
-
representations of some popular characters. So, for example, a
|
419
|
-
string containing only a single reverse solidus character may be
|
420
|
-
represented more compactly as "\\".
|
421
|
-
|
422
|
-
To escape an extended character that is not in the Basic Multilingual
|
423
|
-
Plane, the character is represented as a 12-character sequence,
|
424
|
-
encoding the UTF-16 surrogate pair. So, for example, a string
|
425
|
-
containing only the G clef character (U+1D11E) may be represented as
|
426
|
-
"\uD834\uDD1E".
|
427
|
-
|
428
|
-
string = quotation-mark *char quotation-mark
|
429
|
-
|
430
|
-
char = unescaped /
|
431
|
-
escape (
|
432
|
-
%x22 / ; " quotation mark U+0022
|
433
|
-
%x5C / ; \ reverse solidus U+005C
|
434
|
-
%x2F / ; / solidus U+002F
|
435
|
-
%x62 / ; b backspace U+0008
|
436
|
-
%x66 / ; f form feed U+000C
|
437
|
-
%x6E / ; n line feed U+000A
|
438
|
-
%x72 / ; r carriage return U+000D
|
439
|
-
%x74 / ; t tab U+0009
|
440
|
-
%x75 4HEXDIG ) ; uXXXX U+XXXX
|
441
|
-
|
442
|
-
escape = %x5C ; \
|
443
|
-
|
444
|
-
quotation-mark = %x22 ; "
|
445
|
-
|
446
|
-
unescaped = %x20-21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-10FFFF
|
447
|
-
|
448
|
-
|
449
|
-
|
450
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 8]
|
451
|
-
|
452
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
453
|
-
|
454
|
-
|
455
|
-
8. String and Character Issues
|
456
|
-
|
457
|
-
8.1. Character Encoding
|
458
|
-
|
459
|
-
JSON text SHALL be encoded in UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32. The default
|
460
|
-
encoding is UTF-8, and JSON texts that are encoded in UTF-8 are
|
461
|
-
interoperable in the sense that they will be read successfully by the
|
462
|
-
maximum number of implementations; there are many implementations
|
463
|
-
that cannot successfully read texts in other encodings (such as
|
464
|
-
UTF-16 and UTF-32).
|
465
|
-
|
466
|
-
Implementations MUST NOT add a byte order mark to the beginning of a
|
467
|
-
JSON text. In the interests of interoperability, implementations
|
468
|
-
that parse JSON texts MAY ignore the presence of a byte order mark
|
469
|
-
rather than treating it as an error.
|
470
|
-
|
471
|
-
8.2. Unicode Characters
|
472
|
-
|
473
|
-
When all the strings represented in a JSON text are composed entirely
|
474
|
-
of Unicode characters [UNICODE] (however escaped), then that JSON
|
475
|
-
text is interoperable in the sense that all software implementations
|
476
|
-
that parse it will agree on the contents of names and of string
|
477
|
-
values in objects and arrays.
|
478
|
-
|
479
|
-
However, the ABNF in this specification allows member names and
|
480
|
-
string values to contain bit sequences that cannot encode Unicode
|
481
|
-
characters; for example, "\uDEAD" (a single unpaired UTF-16
|
482
|
-
surrogate). Instances of this have been observed, for example, when
|
483
|
-
a library truncates a UTF-16 string without checking whether the
|
484
|
-
truncation split a surrogate pair. The behavior of software that
|
485
|
-
receives JSON texts containing such values is unpredictable; for
|
486
|
-
example, implementations might return different values for the length
|
487
|
-
of a string value or even suffer fatal runtime exceptions.
|
488
|
-
|
489
|
-
8.3. String Comparison
|
490
|
-
|
491
|
-
Software implementations are typically required to test names of
|
492
|
-
object members for equality. Implementations that transform the
|
493
|
-
textual representation into sequences of Unicode code units and then
|
494
|
-
perform the comparison numerically, code unit by code unit, are
|
495
|
-
interoperable in the sense that implementations will agree in all
|
496
|
-
cases on equality or inequality of two strings. For example,
|
497
|
-
implementations that compare strings with escaped characters
|
498
|
-
unconverted may incorrectly find that "a\\b" and "a\u005Cb" are not
|
499
|
-
equal.
|
500
|
-
|
501
|
-
|
502
|
-
|
503
|
-
|
504
|
-
|
505
|
-
|
506
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 9]
|
507
|
-
|
508
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
509
|
-
|
510
|
-
|
511
|
-
9. Parsers
|
512
|
-
|
513
|
-
A JSON parser transforms a JSON text into another representation. A
|
514
|
-
JSON parser MUST accept all texts that conform to the JSON grammar.
|
515
|
-
A JSON parser MAY accept non-JSON forms or extensions.
|
516
|
-
|
517
|
-
An implementation may set limits on the size of texts that it
|
518
|
-
accepts. An implementation may set limits on the maximum depth of
|
519
|
-
nesting. An implementation may set limits on the range and precision
|
520
|
-
of numbers. An implementation may set limits on the length and
|
521
|
-
character contents of strings.
|
522
|
-
|
523
|
-
10. Generators
|
524
|
-
|
525
|
-
A JSON generator produces JSON text. The resulting text MUST
|
526
|
-
strictly conform to the JSON grammar.
|
527
|
-
|
528
|
-
11. IANA Considerations
|
529
|
-
|
530
|
-
The MIME media type for JSON text is application/json.
|
531
|
-
|
532
|
-
Type name: application
|
533
|
-
|
534
|
-
Subtype name: json
|
535
|
-
|
536
|
-
Required parameters: n/a
|
537
|
-
|
538
|
-
Optional parameters: n/a
|
539
|
-
|
540
|
-
Encoding considerations: binary
|
541
|
-
|
542
|
-
Security considerations: See [RFC7159], Section 12.
|
543
|
-
|
544
|
-
Interoperability considerations: Described in [RFC7159]
|
545
|
-
|
546
|
-
Published specification: [RFC7159]
|
547
|
-
|
548
|
-
Applications that use this media type:
|
549
|
-
JSON has been used to exchange data between applications written
|
550
|
-
in all of these programming languages: ActionScript, C, C#,
|
551
|
-
Clojure, ColdFusion, Common Lisp, E, Erlang, Go, Java, JavaScript,
|
552
|
-
Lua, Objective CAML, Perl, PHP, Python, Rebol, Ruby, Scala, and
|
553
|
-
Scheme.
|
554
|
-
|
555
|
-
|
556
|
-
|
557
|
-
|
558
|
-
|
559
|
-
|
560
|
-
|
561
|
-
|
562
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 10]
|
563
|
-
|
564
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
565
|
-
|
566
|
-
|
567
|
-
Additional information:
|
568
|
-
Magic number(s): n/a
|
569
|
-
File extension(s): .json
|
570
|
-
Macintosh file type code(s): TEXT
|
571
|
-
|
572
|
-
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
573
|
-
IESG
|
574
|
-
<iesg@ietf.org>
|
575
|
-
|
576
|
-
Intended usage: COMMON
|
577
|
-
|
578
|
-
Restrictions on usage: none
|
579
|
-
|
580
|
-
Author:
|
581
|
-
Douglas Crockford
|
582
|
-
<douglas@crockford.com>
|
583
|
-
|
584
|
-
Change controller:
|
585
|
-
IESG
|
586
|
-
<iesg@ietf.org>
|
587
|
-
|
588
|
-
Note: No "charset" parameter is defined for this registration.
|
589
|
-
Adding one really has no effect on compliant recipients.
|
590
|
-
|
591
|
-
12. Security Considerations
|
592
|
-
|
593
|
-
Generally, there are security issues with scripting languages. JSON
|
594
|
-
is a subset of JavaScript but excludes assignment and invocation.
|
595
|
-
|
596
|
-
Since JSON's syntax is borrowed from JavaScript, it is possible to
|
597
|
-
use that language's "eval()" function to parse JSON texts. This
|
598
|
-
generally constitutes an unacceptable security risk, since the text
|
599
|
-
could contain executable code along with data declarations. The same
|
600
|
-
consideration applies to the use of eval()-like functions in any
|
601
|
-
other programming language in which JSON texts conform to that
|
602
|
-
language's syntax.
|
603
|
-
|
604
|
-
|
605
|
-
|
606
|
-
|
607
|
-
|
608
|
-
|
609
|
-
|
610
|
-
|
611
|
-
|
612
|
-
|
613
|
-
|
614
|
-
|
615
|
-
|
616
|
-
|
617
|
-
|
618
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 11]
|
619
|
-
|
620
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
621
|
-
|
622
|
-
|
623
|
-
13. Examples
|
624
|
-
|
625
|
-
This is a JSON object:
|
626
|
-
|
627
|
-
{
|
628
|
-
"Image": {
|
629
|
-
"Width": 800,
|
630
|
-
"Height": 600,
|
631
|
-
"Title": "View from 15th Floor",
|
632
|
-
"Thumbnail": {
|
633
|
-
"Url": "http://www.example.com/image/481989943",
|
634
|
-
"Height": 125,
|
635
|
-
"Width": 100
|
636
|
-
},
|
637
|
-
"Animated" : false,
|
638
|
-
"IDs": [116, 943, 234, 38793]
|
639
|
-
}
|
640
|
-
}
|
641
|
-
|
642
|
-
Its Image member is an object whose Thumbnail member is an object and
|
643
|
-
whose IDs member is an array of numbers.
|
644
|
-
|
645
|
-
This is a JSON array containing two objects:
|
646
|
-
|
647
|
-
[
|
648
|
-
{
|
649
|
-
"precision": "zip",
|
650
|
-
"Latitude": 37.7668,
|
651
|
-
"Longitude": -122.3959,
|
652
|
-
"Address": "",
|
653
|
-
"City": "SAN FRANCISCO",
|
654
|
-
"State": "CA",
|
655
|
-
"Zip": "94107",
|
656
|
-
"Country": "US"
|
657
|
-
},
|
658
|
-
{
|
659
|
-
"precision": "zip",
|
660
|
-
"Latitude": 37.371991,
|
661
|
-
"Longitude": -122.026020,
|
662
|
-
"Address": "",
|
663
|
-
"City": "SUNNYVALE",
|
664
|
-
"State": "CA",
|
665
|
-
"Zip": "94085",
|
666
|
-
"Country": "US"
|
667
|
-
}
|
668
|
-
]
|
669
|
-
|
670
|
-
|
671
|
-
|
672
|
-
|
673
|
-
|
674
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 12]
|
675
|
-
|
676
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
677
|
-
|
678
|
-
|
679
|
-
Here are three small JSON texts containing only values:
|
680
|
-
|
681
|
-
"Hello world!"
|
682
|
-
|
683
|
-
42
|
684
|
-
|
685
|
-
true
|
686
|
-
|
687
|
-
14. Contributors
|
688
|
-
|
689
|
-
RFC 4627 was written by Douglas Crockford. This document was
|
690
|
-
constructed by making a relatively small number of changes to that
|
691
|
-
document; thus, the vast majority of the text here is his.
|
692
|
-
|
693
|
-
15. References
|
694
|
-
|
695
|
-
15.1. Normative References
|
696
|
-
|
697
|
-
[IEEE754] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic", IEEE
|
698
|
-
Standard 754, August 2008,
|
699
|
-
<http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/754/>.
|
700
|
-
|
701
|
-
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
|
702
|
-
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
|
703
|
-
|
704
|
-
[RFC5234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
|
705
|
-
Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.
|
706
|
-
|
707
|
-
[UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard",
|
708
|
-
<http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/>.
|
709
|
-
|
710
|
-
15.2. Informative References
|
711
|
-
|
712
|
-
[ECMA-262] Ecma International, "ECMAScript Language Specification
|
713
|
-
Edition 5.1", Standard ECMA-262, June 2011,
|
714
|
-
<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/
|
715
|
-
Ecma-262.htm>.
|
716
|
-
|
717
|
-
[ECMA-404] Ecma International, "The JSON Data Interchange Format",
|
718
|
-
Standard ECMA-404, October 2013,
|
719
|
-
<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/
|
720
|
-
Ecma-404.htm>.
|
721
|
-
|
722
|
-
[Err3607] RFC Errata, Errata ID 3607, RFC 3607,
|
723
|
-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
|
724
|
-
|
725
|
-
|
726
|
-
|
727
|
-
|
728
|
-
|
729
|
-
|
730
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 13]
|
731
|
-
|
732
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
733
|
-
|
734
|
-
|
735
|
-
[Err607] RFC Errata, Errata ID 607, RFC 607,
|
736
|
-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
|
737
|
-
|
738
|
-
[RFC4627] Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for
|
739
|
-
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006.
|
740
|
-
|
741
|
-
|
742
|
-
|
743
|
-
|
744
|
-
|
745
|
-
|
746
|
-
|
747
|
-
|
748
|
-
|
749
|
-
|
750
|
-
|
751
|
-
|
752
|
-
|
753
|
-
|
754
|
-
|
755
|
-
|
756
|
-
|
757
|
-
|
758
|
-
|
759
|
-
|
760
|
-
|
761
|
-
|
762
|
-
|
763
|
-
|
764
|
-
|
765
|
-
|
766
|
-
|
767
|
-
|
768
|
-
|
769
|
-
|
770
|
-
|
771
|
-
|
772
|
-
|
773
|
-
|
774
|
-
|
775
|
-
|
776
|
-
|
777
|
-
|
778
|
-
|
779
|
-
|
780
|
-
|
781
|
-
|
782
|
-
|
783
|
-
|
784
|
-
|
785
|
-
|
786
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 14]
|
787
|
-
|
788
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
789
|
-
|
790
|
-
|
791
|
-
Appendix A. Changes from RFC 4627
|
792
|
-
|
793
|
-
This section lists changes between this document and the text in RFC
|
794
|
-
4627.
|
795
|
-
|
796
|
-
o Changed the title and abstract of the document.
|
797
|
-
|
798
|
-
o Changed the reference to [UNICODE] to be not version specific.
|
799
|
-
|
800
|
-
o Added a "Specifications of JSON" section.
|
801
|
-
|
802
|
-
o Added an "Introduction to This Revision" section.
|
803
|
-
|
804
|
-
o Changed the definition of "JSON text" so that it can be any JSON
|
805
|
-
value, removing the constraint that it be an object or array.
|
806
|
-
|
807
|
-
o Added language about duplicate object member names, member
|
808
|
-
ordering, and interoperability.
|
809
|
-
|
810
|
-
o Clarified the absence of a requirement that values in an array be
|
811
|
-
of the same JSON type.
|
812
|
-
|
813
|
-
o Applied erratum #607 from RFC 4627 to correctly align the artwork
|
814
|
-
for the definition of "object".
|
815
|
-
|
816
|
-
o Changed "as sequences of digits" to "in the grammar below" in the
|
817
|
-
"Numbers" section, and made base-10-ness explicit.
|
818
|
-
|
819
|
-
o Added language about number interoperability as a function of
|
820
|
-
IEEE754, and added an IEEE754 reference.
|
821
|
-
|
822
|
-
o Added language about interoperability and Unicode characters and
|
823
|
-
about string comparisons. To do this, turned the old "Encoding"
|
824
|
-
section into a "String and Character Issues" section, with three
|
825
|
-
subsections: "Character Encoding", "Unicode Characters", and
|
826
|
-
"String Comparison".
|
827
|
-
|
828
|
-
o Changed guidance in the "Parsers" section to point out that
|
829
|
-
implementations may set limits on the range "and precision" of
|
830
|
-
numbers.
|
831
|
-
|
832
|
-
o Updated and tidied the "IANA Considerations" section.
|
833
|
-
|
834
|
-
o Made a real "Security Considerations" section and lifted the text
|
835
|
-
out of the previous "IANA Considerations" section.
|
836
|
-
|
837
|
-
|
838
|
-
|
839
|
-
|
840
|
-
|
841
|
-
|
842
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 15]
|
843
|
-
|
844
|
-
RFC 7159 JSON March 2014
|
845
|
-
|
846
|
-
|
847
|
-
o Applied erratum #3607 from RFC 4627 by removing the security
|
848
|
-
consideration that begins "A JSON text can be safely passed" and
|
849
|
-
the JavaScript code that went with that consideration.
|
850
|
-
|
851
|
-
o Added a note to the "Security Considerations" section pointing out
|
852
|
-
the risks of using the "eval()" function in JavaScript or any
|
853
|
-
other language in which JSON texts conform to that language's
|
854
|
-
syntax.
|
855
|
-
|
856
|
-
o Added a note to the "IANA Considerations" clarifying the absence
|
857
|
-
of a "charset" parameter for the application/json media type.
|
858
|
-
|
859
|
-
o Changed "100" to 100 and added a boolean field, both in the first
|
860
|
-
example.
|
861
|
-
|
862
|
-
o Added examples of JSON texts with simple values, neither objects
|
863
|
-
nor arrays.
|
864
|
-
|
865
|
-
o Added a "Contributors" section crediting Douglas Crockford.
|
866
|
-
|
867
|
-
o Added a reference to RFC 4627.
|
868
|
-
|
869
|
-
o Moved the ECMAScript reference from Normative to Informative and
|
870
|
-
updated it to reference ECMAScript 5.1, and added a reference to
|
871
|
-
ECMA 404.
|
872
|
-
|
873
|
-
Author's Address
|
874
|
-
|
875
|
-
Tim Bray (editor)
|
876
|
-
Google, Inc.
|
877
|
-
|
878
|
-
EMail: tbray@textuality.com
|
879
|
-
|
880
|
-
|
881
|
-
|
882
|
-
|
883
|
-
|
884
|
-
|
885
|
-
|
886
|
-
|
887
|
-
|
888
|
-
|
889
|
-
|
890
|
-
|
891
|
-
|
892
|
-
|
893
|
-
|
894
|
-
|
895
|
-
|
896
|
-
|
897
|
-
|
898
|
-
Bray Standards Track [Page 16]
|
899
|
-
|