jsmetric4java 0.1
Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
- data/.gitignore +7 -0
- data/.rvmrc +1 -0
- data/Gemfile +8 -0
- data/README +16 -0
- data/Rakefile +37 -0
- data/bin/jsmetric4java +20 -0
- data/boot.rb +5 -0
- data/build +1 -0
- data/features/cyclometric_complexity/boolean_complexity_counting.feature +46 -0
- data/features/cyclometric_complexity/case_complexity_counting.feature +117 -0
- data/features/cyclometric_complexity/exception_complexity_counting.feature +81 -0
- data/features/cyclometric_complexity/function_detection.feature +128 -0
- data/features/cyclometric_complexity/if_else_complexity_counting.feature +178 -0
- data/features/cyclometric_complexity/loop_complexity_counting.feature +81 -0
- data/features/graphing/draw_basic_graph.feature +14 -0
- data/features/reporting/report.feature +13 -0
- data/features/sample_js_files_for_test/foobar.js +30 -0
- data/features/step_definitions/cyclometric_complexity_steps.rb +31 -0
- data/features/step_definitions/graph_steps.rb +10 -0
- data/features/step_definitions/reporting_steps.rb +14 -0
- data/features/support/env.rb +1 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/Curry-1.0.1.js +29 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/dracula_algorithms.js +599 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/dracula_graffle.js +106 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/dracula_graph.js +534 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/graphtest.html +57 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/jquery-1.4.2.min.js +154 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/jsgraphsource.js +12 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/raphael-min.js +7 -0
- data/jsgraphlib/seedrandom.js +266 -0
- data/jsmetric.gemspec +23 -0
- data/lib/cc_report.rb +24 -0
- data/lib/complexity_analyser.rb +90 -0
- data/lib/fulljslint.js +6100 -0
- data/lib/graphing/graph_analyser.rb +19 -0
- data/lib/js_lint.rb +23 -0
- data/lib/json2.js +480 -0
- data/lib/options.js +24 -0
- data/lib/report.rb +26 -0
- data/lib/utils.rb +18 -0
- data/lib/version.rb +3 -0
- data/spec/spec_helper.rb +1 -0
- data/tasks/dev.rb +4 -0
- data/tasks/run.rb +55 -0
- metadata +129 -0
data/.gitignore
ADDED
data/.rvmrc
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
1
|
+
rvm jruby@jsmetric4java
|
data/Gemfile
ADDED
data/README
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|
1
|
+
[WARNING: This project is not yet ready for proper use. Its very much an alpha at the moment]
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
Dependencies: (Jruby 1.6.1 or greater)
|
4
|
+
|
5
|
+
*** Installation
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
$ gem install jsmetric4java
|
8
|
+
|
9
|
+
|
10
|
+
*** Usage
|
11
|
+
|
12
|
+
Cyclometric complexity for a file:
|
13
|
+
$ ./bin/jsmetric4java path_to_js_file
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
Cyclometric complexity for all .js files in a Directory
|
16
|
+
$ ./bin/jsmetric4java path_to_dir
|
data/Rakefile
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
|
1
|
+
require 'bundler'
|
2
|
+
require "bundler/setup"
|
3
|
+
require "rubygems"
|
4
|
+
|
5
|
+
Bundler::GemHelper.install_tasks
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
PROJECT_ROOT = File.expand_path("..", __FILE__)
|
8
|
+
$:.unshift "#{PROJECT_ROOT}/lib"
|
9
|
+
|
10
|
+
require 'rake'
|
11
|
+
require 'rake/testtask'
|
12
|
+
require 'rake/rdoctask'
|
13
|
+
|
14
|
+
# Cucumber configurations
|
15
|
+
require 'cucumber/rake/task'
|
16
|
+
Cucumber::Rake::Task.new do |t|
|
17
|
+
t.cucumber_opts = "--format pretty"
|
18
|
+
end
|
19
|
+
|
20
|
+
# RSpec
|
21
|
+
|
22
|
+
require 'rspec/core/rake_task'
|
23
|
+
RSpec::Core::RakeTask.new(:spec)
|
24
|
+
|
25
|
+
|
26
|
+
# other Project tasks
|
27
|
+
Dir[File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__),"tasks","*.rb")].each {|file| require file }
|
28
|
+
|
29
|
+
namespace :jsmetrics do
|
30
|
+
desc "master build"
|
31
|
+
task :build => [:spec, "cucumber"]
|
32
|
+
end
|
33
|
+
|
34
|
+
task :default => ["jsmetrics:build"]
|
35
|
+
|
36
|
+
|
37
|
+
|
data/bin/jsmetric4java
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|
1
|
+
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
require "rubygems"
|
4
|
+
require "bundler/setup"
|
5
|
+
|
6
|
+
lib = File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../lib')
|
7
|
+
$LOAD_PATH.unshift(lib) if File.directory?(lib) && !$LOAD_PATH.include?(lib)
|
8
|
+
|
9
|
+
|
10
|
+
args = ARGV.dup
|
11
|
+
ARGV.clear
|
12
|
+
begin
|
13
|
+
file_path = args.shift.strip
|
14
|
+
rescue
|
15
|
+
puts "Missing js file or directory as argument"
|
16
|
+
exit false
|
17
|
+
end
|
18
|
+
|
19
|
+
require 'report'
|
20
|
+
puts Report.for file_path
|
data/boot.rb
ADDED
data/build
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
1
|
+
bundle exec rake
|
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@booloperator
|
2
|
+
Feature: Calculate complexity for code that includes BOOLEAN decisions
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
Scenario: IF statement with BOOLEAN &&
|
5
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
6
|
+
"""
|
7
|
+
function foo() {
|
8
|
+
var bar,baz;
|
9
|
+
if(bar && baz) {}
|
10
|
+
};
|
11
|
+
"""
|
12
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
13
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
Scenario: IF statement with BOOLEAN ||
|
16
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
17
|
+
"""
|
18
|
+
function foo() {
|
19
|
+
var bar,baz;
|
20
|
+
if(bar || baz) {}
|
21
|
+
};
|
22
|
+
"""
|
23
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
24
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
25
|
+
|
26
|
+
Scenario: IF statement with multiple BOOLEAN &&
|
27
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
28
|
+
"""
|
29
|
+
function foo() {
|
30
|
+
var bar,baz;
|
31
|
+
if(bar && baz && bar) {}
|
32
|
+
};
|
33
|
+
"""
|
34
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
35
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "4"
|
36
|
+
|
37
|
+
Scenario: IF statement with multiple BOOLEAN operators
|
38
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
39
|
+
"""
|
40
|
+
function foo() {
|
41
|
+
var bar,baz;
|
42
|
+
if(bar && baz || bar && baz) {}
|
43
|
+
};
|
44
|
+
"""
|
45
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
46
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "5"
|
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@switch
|
2
|
+
Feature: Calculate CASE/DEFAULT complexity for a stand alone Javascript function
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
Scenario: SWITCH with DEFAULT only
|
5
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
6
|
+
"""
|
7
|
+
function foo() {
|
8
|
+
var bar;
|
9
|
+
switch(bar) {
|
10
|
+
default:
|
11
|
+
//do something
|
12
|
+
}
|
13
|
+
}
|
14
|
+
"""
|
15
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
16
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
17
|
+
|
18
|
+
Scenario: SWITCH with single CASE statement
|
19
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
20
|
+
"""
|
21
|
+
function foo() {
|
22
|
+
var bar;
|
23
|
+
switch(bar) {
|
24
|
+
case true:
|
25
|
+
//do something
|
26
|
+
}
|
27
|
+
}
|
28
|
+
"""
|
29
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
30
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
31
|
+
|
32
|
+
Scenario: SWITCH with single CASE and it breaks out the SWITCH statements
|
33
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
34
|
+
"""
|
35
|
+
function foo() {
|
36
|
+
var bar;
|
37
|
+
switch(bar) {
|
38
|
+
case true:
|
39
|
+
//do something
|
40
|
+
break;
|
41
|
+
}
|
42
|
+
}
|
43
|
+
"""
|
44
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
45
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
46
|
+
|
47
|
+
Scenario: SWITCH with multiple CASE and each breaks out the SWITCH
|
48
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
49
|
+
"""
|
50
|
+
function foo() {
|
51
|
+
var bar;
|
52
|
+
switch(bar) {
|
53
|
+
case true:
|
54
|
+
//do something
|
55
|
+
break;
|
56
|
+
|
57
|
+
case false:
|
58
|
+
//do something
|
59
|
+
break;
|
60
|
+
}
|
61
|
+
}
|
62
|
+
"""
|
63
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
64
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
65
|
+
|
66
|
+
Scenario: SWITCH with multiple CASE and neither break out the SWITCH
|
67
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
68
|
+
"""
|
69
|
+
function foo() {
|
70
|
+
var bar, temp;
|
71
|
+
|
72
|
+
switch(bar) {
|
73
|
+
case true:
|
74
|
+
temp = "first"
|
75
|
+
//do something
|
76
|
+
|
77
|
+
case false:
|
78
|
+
temp = "second"
|
79
|
+
//do something
|
80
|
+
}
|
81
|
+
}
|
82
|
+
"""
|
83
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
84
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
85
|
+
|
86
|
+
|
87
|
+
Scenario: SWITCH with multiple CASE with no-ops are considered as a single Case
|
88
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
89
|
+
"""
|
90
|
+
function foo() {
|
91
|
+
var bar, temp;
|
92
|
+
|
93
|
+
switch(bar) {
|
94
|
+
case true:
|
95
|
+
case false:
|
96
|
+
case "blah":
|
97
|
+
}
|
98
|
+
}
|
99
|
+
"""
|
100
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
101
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
102
|
+
|
103
|
+
Scenario: SWITCH with multiple CASE with no-ops and Default
|
104
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
105
|
+
"""
|
106
|
+
function foo() {
|
107
|
+
var bar, temp;
|
108
|
+
|
109
|
+
switch(bar) {
|
110
|
+
case true:
|
111
|
+
case false:
|
112
|
+
default:
|
113
|
+
}
|
114
|
+
}
|
115
|
+
"""
|
116
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
117
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@exceptions
|
2
|
+
Feature: Calculate TRY/CATCH complexity for a stand alone Javascript function
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
Scenario: Single TRY CATCH in a function
|
5
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
6
|
+
"""
|
7
|
+
function foo() {
|
8
|
+
try
|
9
|
+
{
|
10
|
+
//Run some code here
|
11
|
+
}
|
12
|
+
catch(err)
|
13
|
+
{
|
14
|
+
//Handle errors here
|
15
|
+
}
|
16
|
+
}
|
17
|
+
"""
|
18
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
19
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
20
|
+
|
21
|
+
Scenario: Single TRY FINALLY in a function
|
22
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
23
|
+
"""
|
24
|
+
function foo() {
|
25
|
+
try
|
26
|
+
{
|
27
|
+
//Run some code here
|
28
|
+
}
|
29
|
+
finally
|
30
|
+
{
|
31
|
+
//Handle errors here
|
32
|
+
}
|
33
|
+
}
|
34
|
+
"""
|
35
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
36
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
37
|
+
|
38
|
+
Scenario: Single TRY CATCH FINALLY in a function
|
39
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
40
|
+
"""
|
41
|
+
function foo() {
|
42
|
+
try
|
43
|
+
{
|
44
|
+
//Run some code here
|
45
|
+
}
|
46
|
+
catch(err)
|
47
|
+
{
|
48
|
+
//Handle errors here
|
49
|
+
}
|
50
|
+
finally
|
51
|
+
{
|
52
|
+
//Handle errors here
|
53
|
+
}
|
54
|
+
}
|
55
|
+
"""
|
56
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
57
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
58
|
+
|
59
|
+
Scenario: Nested TRY inside a CATCH in a function
|
60
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
61
|
+
"""
|
62
|
+
function foo() {
|
63
|
+
try
|
64
|
+
{
|
65
|
+
//Run some code here
|
66
|
+
}
|
67
|
+
catch(err)
|
68
|
+
{
|
69
|
+
|
70
|
+
try
|
71
|
+
{
|
72
|
+
//Run some code here
|
73
|
+
}
|
74
|
+
catch (anotherErr)
|
75
|
+
{
|
76
|
+
//Handle errors here
|
77
|
+
}
|
78
|
+
}
|
79
|
+
"""
|
80
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
81
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@functions
|
2
|
+
Feature: Calculate number of functions and their names for a stand alone Javascript snippet
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
Scenario: Only statements and no functions
|
5
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
6
|
+
"""
|
7
|
+
var foo = {} || "";
|
8
|
+
var baz = 2;
|
9
|
+
"""
|
10
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
11
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "0"
|
12
|
+
|
13
|
+
Scenario: Single javascript function
|
14
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
15
|
+
"""
|
16
|
+
function foo() {};
|
17
|
+
"""
|
18
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
19
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "1"
|
20
|
+
And the function name is "foo"
|
21
|
+
|
22
|
+
Scenario: Multiple javascript functions
|
23
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
24
|
+
"""
|
25
|
+
function foo() {};
|
26
|
+
function bar() {};
|
27
|
+
"""
|
28
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
29
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "2"
|
30
|
+
And the function names are:
|
31
|
+
| Name |
|
32
|
+
| foo |
|
33
|
+
| bar |
|
34
|
+
|
35
|
+
|
36
|
+
Scenario: Multiple javascript functions nested
|
37
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
38
|
+
"""
|
39
|
+
function foo() {
|
40
|
+
function bar() {};
|
41
|
+
};
|
42
|
+
"""
|
43
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
44
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "2"
|
45
|
+
|
46
|
+
Scenario: Single outer function with inner private function assigned to a var
|
47
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
48
|
+
"""
|
49
|
+
function foo() {
|
50
|
+
var baz = function() {};
|
51
|
+
};
|
52
|
+
"""
|
53
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
54
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "2"
|
55
|
+
And the function names are:
|
56
|
+
| Name |
|
57
|
+
| foo |
|
58
|
+
| baz |
|
59
|
+
|
60
|
+
Scenario: Single outer function with inner private function that is unassigned
|
61
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
62
|
+
"""
|
63
|
+
function foo() {
|
64
|
+
function bar() {};
|
65
|
+
};
|
66
|
+
"""
|
67
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
68
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "2"
|
69
|
+
And the function names are:
|
70
|
+
| Name |
|
71
|
+
| foo |
|
72
|
+
| bar |
|
73
|
+
|
74
|
+
Scenario: Single outer function with inner public function
|
75
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
76
|
+
"""
|
77
|
+
function foo() {
|
78
|
+
this.baz.flaz = function() {};
|
79
|
+
};
|
80
|
+
"""
|
81
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
82
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "2"
|
83
|
+
And the function names are:
|
84
|
+
| Name |
|
85
|
+
| foo |
|
86
|
+
| this.baz.flaz |
|
87
|
+
|
88
|
+
Scenario: Single outer Object with inner public function
|
89
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
90
|
+
"""
|
91
|
+
var foo = {
|
92
|
+
flaz : function() {},
|
93
|
+
blah : "",
|
94
|
+
baz : function() {}
|
95
|
+
};
|
96
|
+
"""
|
97
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
98
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "2"
|
99
|
+
And the function names are:
|
100
|
+
| Name |
|
101
|
+
| flaz |
|
102
|
+
| baz |
|
103
|
+
|
104
|
+
Scenario: Single outer function with inner annonymous function
|
105
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
106
|
+
"""
|
107
|
+
function foo() {
|
108
|
+
return function() {};
|
109
|
+
};
|
110
|
+
"""
|
111
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
112
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "2"
|
113
|
+
And the function names are:
|
114
|
+
| Name |
|
115
|
+
| foo |
|
116
|
+
| Annonymous |
|
117
|
+
|
118
|
+
|
119
|
+
Scenario: Single javascript function containing the string "function"
|
120
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
121
|
+
"""
|
122
|
+
function foo() {
|
123
|
+
return "function";
|
124
|
+
};
|
125
|
+
"""
|
126
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
127
|
+
Then the number of functions is reported as "1"
|
128
|
+
And the function name is "foo"
|
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@ifelse
|
2
|
+
Feature: Calculate IF/ELSE complexity for a stand alone Javascript function
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
Scenario: No branches
|
5
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
6
|
+
"""
|
7
|
+
function foo() { };
|
8
|
+
"""
|
9
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
10
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "1"
|
11
|
+
|
12
|
+
Scenario: Just one IF statement
|
13
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
14
|
+
"""
|
15
|
+
function foo() {
|
16
|
+
if (true) {
|
17
|
+
// do something
|
18
|
+
}
|
19
|
+
}
|
20
|
+
"""
|
21
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
22
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
23
|
+
|
24
|
+
Scenario: 2 sequential IF statements
|
25
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
26
|
+
"""
|
27
|
+
function foo() {
|
28
|
+
if (true) {
|
29
|
+
// do something
|
30
|
+
}
|
31
|
+
if (true) {
|
32
|
+
// do something else
|
33
|
+
}
|
34
|
+
}
|
35
|
+
"""
|
36
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
37
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
38
|
+
|
39
|
+
Scenario: 2 nested IF statements
|
40
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
41
|
+
"""
|
42
|
+
function foo() {
|
43
|
+
if (true) {
|
44
|
+
// do something
|
45
|
+
if (true) {
|
46
|
+
// do something else
|
47
|
+
}
|
48
|
+
}
|
49
|
+
}
|
50
|
+
"""
|
51
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
52
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
53
|
+
|
54
|
+
Scenario: A single IF with Else statement
|
55
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
56
|
+
"""
|
57
|
+
function foo() {
|
58
|
+
if (true) {
|
59
|
+
// do something
|
60
|
+
}
|
61
|
+
else {
|
62
|
+
// do something else
|
63
|
+
}
|
64
|
+
}
|
65
|
+
"""
|
66
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
67
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
68
|
+
|
69
|
+
Scenario: 2 nested IF/Else statements
|
70
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
71
|
+
"""
|
72
|
+
function foo() {
|
73
|
+
if (true) {
|
74
|
+
// do something
|
75
|
+
if (true) {
|
76
|
+
// do something else
|
77
|
+
}
|
78
|
+
else {
|
79
|
+
// do this
|
80
|
+
}
|
81
|
+
}
|
82
|
+
else {
|
83
|
+
// do that
|
84
|
+
}
|
85
|
+
}
|
86
|
+
"""
|
87
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
88
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
89
|
+
|
90
|
+
Scenario: An IF-ELSE-IF type scenario
|
91
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
92
|
+
"""
|
93
|
+
function foo() {
|
94
|
+
if (true) {
|
95
|
+
}
|
96
|
+
else if(true) {
|
97
|
+
// do that
|
98
|
+
}
|
99
|
+
}
|
100
|
+
"""
|
101
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
102
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
103
|
+
|
104
|
+
Scenario: An IF-ELSE-IF and then ELSE type scenario
|
105
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
106
|
+
"""
|
107
|
+
function foo() {
|
108
|
+
if (true) {
|
109
|
+
// do something
|
110
|
+
}
|
111
|
+
else if(true) {
|
112
|
+
// do this
|
113
|
+
}
|
114
|
+
else {
|
115
|
+
// do that
|
116
|
+
}
|
117
|
+
}
|
118
|
+
"""
|
119
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
120
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|
121
|
+
|
122
|
+
|
123
|
+
Scenario: A nested IF-ELSE-IF type scenario
|
124
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
125
|
+
"""
|
126
|
+
function foo() {
|
127
|
+
if (true) {
|
128
|
+
if (true) {
|
129
|
+
}
|
130
|
+
else if(true) {
|
131
|
+
// do that
|
132
|
+
}
|
133
|
+
}
|
134
|
+
}
|
135
|
+
"""
|
136
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
137
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "4"
|
138
|
+
|
139
|
+
Scenario: Multiple nested IF-ELSE-IF type scenario
|
140
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
141
|
+
"""
|
142
|
+
function foo() {
|
143
|
+
if (true) {
|
144
|
+
if (true) {
|
145
|
+
// do this
|
146
|
+
}
|
147
|
+
else if(true) {
|
148
|
+
// do that
|
149
|
+
}
|
150
|
+
}
|
151
|
+
else if(true) {
|
152
|
+
// do something
|
153
|
+
}
|
154
|
+
}
|
155
|
+
"""
|
156
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
157
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "5"
|
158
|
+
|
159
|
+
Scenario: IF statement implied with ?
|
160
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
161
|
+
"""
|
162
|
+
function foo() {
|
163
|
+
(true)? true : false;
|
164
|
+
}
|
165
|
+
"""
|
166
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
167
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "2"
|
168
|
+
|
169
|
+
|
170
|
+
Scenario: IF statement nested inside a ternary operator
|
171
|
+
Given javascript code as:
|
172
|
+
"""
|
173
|
+
function foo() {
|
174
|
+
(true)? "" : (false) ? true :"" ;
|
175
|
+
}
|
176
|
+
"""
|
177
|
+
When I run the complexity analysis on it
|
178
|
+
Then the complexity is reported as "3"
|