google-cloud-security_center 0.1.0

data/lib/google/cloud/security_center/v1/doc/google/protobuf/field_mask.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+# Copyright 2019 Google LLC
+#
+# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+# You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+#     https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+
+
+module Google
+  module Protobuf
+    # `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
+    #
+    #     paths: "f.a"
+    #     paths: "f.b.d"
+    #
+    # Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
+    # fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
+    # message in `f.b`.
+    #
+    # Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
+    # returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
+    # Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
+    #
+    # = Field Masks in Projections
+    #
+    # When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
+    # sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
+    # specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
+    # example is applied to a response message as follows:
+    #
+    #     f {
+    #       a : 22
+    #       b {
+    #         d : 1
+    #         x : 2
+    #       }
+    #       y : 13
+    #     }
+    #     z: 8
+    #
+    # The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
+    # (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
+    # output):
+    #
+    #
+    #     f {
+    #       a : 22
+    #       b {
+    #         d : 1
+    #       }
+    #     }
+    #
+    # A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
+    # paths string.
+    #
+    # If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
+    # operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
+    # had been specified).
+    #
+    # Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
+    # top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
+    # field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
+    # list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
+    # in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
+    # other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
+    # clearly documented together with its declaration in the API.  In
+    # any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
+    # behavior for APIs.
+    #
+    # = Field Masks in Update Operations
+    #
+    # A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
+    # targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
+    # to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
+    # and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
+    # describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
+    # fields not covered by the mask.
+    #
+    # If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
+    # be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
+    # a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
+    #
+    # If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
+    # update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
+    # in the target resource.
+    #
+    # For example, given the target message:
+    #
+    #     f {
+    #       b {
+    #         d: 1
+    #         x: 2
+    #       }
+    #       c: [1]
+    #     }
+    #
+    # And an update message:
+    #
+    #     f {
+    #       b {
+    #         d: 10
+    #       }
+    #       c: [2]
+    #     }
+    #
+    # then if the field mask is:
+    #
+    #  paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
+    #
+    # then the result will be:
+    #
+    #     f {
+    #       b {
+    #         d: 10
+    #         x: 2
+    #       }
+    #       c: [1, 2]
+    #     }
+    #
+    # An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
+    # repeated and message fields.
+    #
+    # In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
+    # be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
+    # Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
+    # instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
+    # not provide a mask as described below.
+    #
+    # If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
+    # all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
+    # Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
+    # fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
+    # the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
+    # behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
+    # a field mask, producing an error if not.
+    #
+    # As with get operations, the location of the resource which
+    # describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
+    # operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
+    # required to be honored by the API.
+    #
+    # == Considerations for HTTP REST
+    #
+    # The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
+    # be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
+    # (PUT must only be used for full updates).
+    #
+    # = JSON Encoding of Field Masks
+    #
+    # In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
+    # separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
+    # to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
+    #
+    # As an example, consider the following message declarations:
+    #
+    #     message Profile {
+    #       User user = 1;
+    #       Photo photo = 2;
+    #     }
+    #     message User {
+    #       string display_name = 1;
+    #       string address = 2;
+    #     }
+    #
+    # In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
+    #
+    #     mask {
+    #       paths: "user.display_name"
+    #       paths: "photo"
+    #     }
+    #
+    # In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
+    #
+    #     {
+    #       mask: "user.displayName,photo"
+    #     }
+    #
+    # = Field Masks and Oneof Fields
+    #
+    # Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
+    # following message:
+    #
+    #     message SampleMessage {
+    #       oneof test_oneof {
+    #         string name = 4;
+    #         SubMessage sub_message = 9;
+    #       }
+    #     }
+    #
+    # The field mask can be:
+    #
+    #     mask {
+    #       paths: "name"
+    #     }
+    #
+    # Or:
+    #
+    #     mask {
+    #       paths: "sub_message"
+    #     }
+    #
+    # Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
+    # paths.
+    #
+    # == Field Mask Verification
+    #
+    # The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
+    # request should verify the included field paths, and return an
+    # `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is duplicated or unmappable.
+    # @!attribute [rw] paths
+    #   @return [Array<String>]
+    #     The set of field mask paths.
+    class FieldMask; end
+  end
+end

data/lib/google/cloud/security_center/v1/doc/google/protobuf/struct.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# Copyright 2019 Google LLC
+#
+# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+# You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+#     https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+
+
+module Google
+  module Protobuf
+    # `Struct` represents a structured data value, consisting of fields
+    # which map to dynamically typed values. In some languages, `Struct`
+    # might be supported by a native representation. For example, in
+    # scripting languages like JS a struct is represented as an
+    # object. The details of that representation are described together
+    # with the proto support for the language.
+    #
+    # The JSON representation for `Struct` is JSON object.
+    # @!attribute [rw] fields
+    #   @return [Hash{String => Google::Protobuf::Value}]
+    #     Unordered map of dynamically typed values.
+    class Struct; end
+
+    # `Value` represents a dynamically typed value which can be either
+    # null, a number, a string, a boolean, a recursive struct value, or a
+    # list of values. A producer of value is expected to set one of that
+    # variants, absence of any variant indicates an error.
+    #
+    # The JSON representation for `Value` is JSON value.
+    # @!attribute [rw] null_value
+    #   @return [Google::Protobuf::NullValue]
+    #     Represents a null value.
+    # @!attribute [rw] number_value
+    #   @return [Float]
+    #     Represents a double value.
+    # @!attribute [rw] string_value
+    #   @return [String]
+    #     Represents a string value.
+    # @!attribute [rw] bool_value
+    #   @return [true, false]
+    #     Represents a boolean value.
+    # @!attribute [rw] struct_value
+    #   @return [Google::Protobuf::Struct]
+    #     Represents a structured value.
+    # @!attribute [rw] list_value
+    #   @return [Google::Protobuf::ListValue]
+    #     Represents a repeated `Value`.
+    class Value; end
+
+    # `ListValue` is a wrapper around a repeated field of values.
+    #
+    # The JSON representation for `ListValue` is JSON array.
+    # @!attribute [rw] values
+    #   @return [Array<Google::Protobuf::Value>]
+    #     Repeated field of dynamically typed values.
+    class ListValue; end
+
+    # `NullValue` is a singleton enumeration to represent the null value for the
+    # `Value` type union.
+    #
+    #  The JSON representation for `NullValue` is JSON `null`.
+    module NullValue
+      # Null value.
+      NULL_VALUE = 0
+    end
+  end
+end

data/lib/google/cloud/security_center/v1/doc/google/protobuf/timestamp.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+# Copyright 2019 Google LLC
+#
+# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+# You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+#     https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+
+
+module Google
+  module Protobuf
+    # A Timestamp represents a point in time independent of any time zone or local
+    # calendar, encoded as a count of seconds and fractions of seconds at
+    # nanosecond resolution. The count is relative to an epoch at UTC midnight on
+    # January 1, 1970, in the proleptic Gregorian calendar which extends the
+    # Gregorian calendar backwards to year one.
+    #
+    # All minutes are 60 seconds long. Leap seconds are "smeared" so that no leap
+    # second table is needed for interpretation, using a [24-hour linear
+    # smear](https://developers.google.com/time/smear).
+    #
+    # The range is from 0001-01-01T00:00:00Z to 9999-12-31T23:59:59.999999999Z. By
+    # restricting to that range, we ensure that we can convert to and from [RFC
+    # 3339](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt) date strings.
+    #
+    # = Examples
+    #
+    # Example 1: Compute Timestamp from POSIX `time()`.
+    #
+    #     Timestamp timestamp;
+    #     timestamp.set_seconds(time(NULL));
+    #     timestamp.set_nanos(0);
+    #
+    # Example 2: Compute Timestamp from POSIX `gettimeofday()`.
+    #
+    #     struct timeval tv;
+    #     gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
+    #
+    #     Timestamp timestamp;
+    #     timestamp.set_seconds(tv.tv_sec);
+    #     timestamp.set_nanos(tv.tv_usec * 1000);
+    #
+    # Example 3: Compute Timestamp from Win32 `GetSystemTimeAsFileTime()`.
+    #
+    #     FILETIME ft;
+    #     GetSystemTimeAsFileTime(&ft);
+    #     UINT64 ticks = (((UINT64)ft.dwHighDateTime) << 32) | ft.dwLowDateTime;
+    #
+    #     // A Windows tick is 100 nanoseconds. Windows epoch 1601-01-01T00:00:00Z
+    #     // is 11644473600 seconds before Unix epoch 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z.
+    #     Timestamp timestamp;
+    #     timestamp.set_seconds((INT64) ((ticks / 10000000) - 11644473600LL));
+    #     timestamp.set_nanos((INT32) ((ticks % 10000000) * 100));
+    #
+    # Example 4: Compute Timestamp from Java `System.currentTimeMillis()`.
+    #
+    #     long millis = System.currentTimeMillis();
+    #
+    #     Timestamp timestamp = Timestamp.newBuilder().setSeconds(millis / 1000)
+    #         .setNanos((int) ((millis % 1000) * 1000000)).build();
+    #
+    #
+    # Example 5: Compute Timestamp from current time in Python.
+    #
+    #     timestamp = Timestamp()
+    #     timestamp.GetCurrentTime()
+    #
+    # = JSON Mapping
+    #
+    # In JSON format, the Timestamp type is encoded as a string in the
+    # [RFC 3339](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt) format. That is, the
+    # format is "{year}-{month}-{day}T{hour}:{min}:{sec}[.{frac_sec}]Z"
+    # where {year} is always expressed using four digits while {month}, {day},
+    # {hour}, {min}, and {sec} are zero-padded to two digits each. The fractional
+    # seconds, which can go up to 9 digits (i.e. up to 1 nanosecond resolution),
+    # are optional. The "Z" suffix indicates the timezone ("UTC"); the timezone
+    # is required. A proto3 JSON serializer should always use UTC (as indicated by
+    # "Z") when printing the Timestamp type and a proto3 JSON parser should be
+    # able to accept both UTC and other timezones (as indicated by an offset).
+    #
+    # For example, "2017-01-15T01:30:15.01Z" encodes 15.01 seconds past
+    # 01:30 UTC on January 15, 2017.
+    #
+    # In JavaScript, one can convert a Date object to this format using the
+    # standard [toISOString()](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Date/toISOString)
+    # method. In Python, a standard `datetime.datetime` object can be converted
+    # to this format using [`strftime`](https://docs.python.org/2/library/time.html#time.strftime)
+    # with the time format spec '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%fZ'. Likewise, in Java, one
+    # can use the Joda Time's [`ISODateTimeFormat.dateTime()`](
+    # http://www.joda.org/joda-time/apidocs/org/joda/time/format/ISODateTimeFormat.html#dateTime%2D%2D
+    # ) to obtain a formatter capable of generating timestamps in this format.
+    # @!attribute [rw] seconds
+    #   @return [Integer]
+    #     Represents seconds of UTC time since Unix epoch
+    #     1970-01-01T00:00:00Z. Must be from 0001-01-01T00:00:00Z to
+    #     9999-12-31T23:59:59Z inclusive.
+    # @!attribute [rw] nanos
+    #   @return [Integer]
+    #     Non-negative fractions of a second at nanosecond resolution. Negative
+    #     second values with fractions must still have non-negative nanos values
+    #     that count forward in time. Must be from 0 to 999,999,999
+    #     inclusive.
+    class Timestamp; end
+  end
+end

data/lib/google/cloud/security_center/v1/doc/google/rpc/status.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+# Copyright 2019 Google LLC
+#
+# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+# You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+#     https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+
+
+module Google
+  module Rpc
+    # The `Status` type defines a logical error model that is suitable for
+    # different programming environments, including REST APIs and RPC APIs. It is
+    # used by [gRPC](https://github.com/grpc). The error model is designed to be:
+    #
+    # * Simple to use and understand for most users
+    # * Flexible enough to meet unexpected needs
+    #
+    # = Overview
+    #
+    # The `Status` message contains three pieces of data: error code, error
+    # message, and error details. The error code should be an enum value of
+    # {Google::Rpc::Code}, but it may accept additional error codes
+    # if needed.  The error message should be a developer-facing English message
+    # that helps developers *understand* and *resolve* the error. If a localized
+    # user-facing error message is needed, put the localized message in the error
+    # details or localize it in the client. The optional error details may contain
+    # arbitrary information about the error. There is a predefined set of error
+    # detail types in the package `google.rpc` that can be used for common error
+    # conditions.
+    #
+    # = Language mapping
+    #
+    # The `Status` message is the logical representation of the error model, but it
+    # is not necessarily the actual wire format. When the `Status` message is
+    # exposed in different client libraries and different wire protocols, it can be
+    # mapped differently. For example, it will likely be mapped to some exceptions
+    # in Java, but more likely mapped to some error codes in C.
+    #
+    # = Other uses
+    #
+    # The error model and the `Status` message can be used in a variety of
+    # environments, either with or without APIs, to provide a
+    # consistent developer experience across different environments.
+    #
+    # Example uses of this error model include:
+    #
+    # * Partial errors. If a service needs to return partial errors to the client,
+    #   it may embed the `Status` in the normal response to indicate the partial
+    #   errors.
+    #
+    # * Workflow errors. A typical workflow has multiple steps. Each step may
+    #   have a `Status` message for error reporting.
+    #
+    # * Batch operations. If a client uses batch request and batch response, the
+    #   `Status` message should be used directly inside batch response, one for
+    #   each error sub-response.
+    #
+    # * Asynchronous operations. If an API call embeds asynchronous operation
+    #   results in its response, the status of those operations should be
+    #   represented directly using the `Status` message.
+    #
+    # * Logging. If some API errors are stored in logs, the message `Status` could
+    #   be used directly after any stripping needed for security/privacy reasons.
+    # @!attribute [rw] code
+    #   @return [Integer]
+    #     The status code, which should be an enum value of
+    #     {Google::Rpc::Code}.
+    # @!attribute [rw] message
+    #   @return [String]
+    #     A developer-facing error message, which should be in English. Any
+    #     user-facing error message should be localized and sent in the
+    #     {Google::Rpc::Status#details} field, or localized
+    #     by the client.
+    # @!attribute [rw] details
+    #   @return [Array<Google::Protobuf::Any>]
+    #     A list of messages that carry the error details.  There is a common set of
+    #     message types for APIs to use.
+    class Status; end
+  end
+end