google-cloud-scheduler 0.1.0
Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
- checksums.yaml +7 -0
- data/.yardopts +9 -0
- data/LICENSE +201 -0
- data/README.md +68 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler.rb +141 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1.rb +139 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/cloud_scheduler_client.rb +609 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/cloud_scheduler_client_config.json +66 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/cloudscheduler_pb.rb +62 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/cloudscheduler_services_pb.rb +84 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/credentials.rb +41 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/cloudscheduler.rb +142 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/job.rb +199 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/target.rb +280 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/protobuf/any.rb +130 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/protobuf/duration.rb +91 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/protobuf/empty.rb +29 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/protobuf/field_mask.rb +230 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/protobuf/timestamp.rb +109 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/doc/google/rpc/status.rb +84 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/helpers.rb +48 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/job_pb.rb +56 -0
- data/lib/google/cloud/scheduler/v1beta1/target_pb.rb +58 -0
- metadata +149 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
|
1
|
+
# Copyright 2018 Google LLC
|
2
|
+
#
|
3
|
+
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
4
|
+
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
5
|
+
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
6
|
+
#
|
7
|
+
# https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
8
|
+
#
|
9
|
+
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
10
|
+
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
11
|
+
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
12
|
+
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
13
|
+
# limitations under the License.
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
|
16
|
+
module Google
|
17
|
+
module Protobuf
|
18
|
+
# A generic empty message that you can re-use to avoid defining duplicated
|
19
|
+
# empty messages in your APIs. A typical example is to use it as the request
|
20
|
+
# or the response type of an API method. For instance:
|
21
|
+
#
|
22
|
+
# service Foo {
|
23
|
+
# rpc Bar(google.protobuf.Empty) returns (google.protobuf.Empty);
|
24
|
+
# }
|
25
|
+
#
|
26
|
+
# The JSON representation for `Empty` is empty JSON object `{}`.
|
27
|
+
class Empty; end
|
28
|
+
end
|
29
|
+
end
|
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
|
|
1
|
+
# Copyright 2018 Google LLC
|
2
|
+
#
|
3
|
+
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
4
|
+
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
5
|
+
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
6
|
+
#
|
7
|
+
# https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
8
|
+
#
|
9
|
+
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
10
|
+
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
11
|
+
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
12
|
+
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
13
|
+
# limitations under the License.
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
|
16
|
+
module Google
|
17
|
+
module Protobuf
|
18
|
+
# `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
|
19
|
+
#
|
20
|
+
# paths: "f.a"
|
21
|
+
# paths: "f.b.d"
|
22
|
+
#
|
23
|
+
# Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
|
24
|
+
# fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
|
25
|
+
# message in `f.b`.
|
26
|
+
#
|
27
|
+
# Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
|
28
|
+
# returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
|
29
|
+
# Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
|
30
|
+
#
|
31
|
+
# = Field Masks in Projections
|
32
|
+
#
|
33
|
+
# When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
|
34
|
+
# sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
|
35
|
+
# specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
|
36
|
+
# example is applied to a response message as follows:
|
37
|
+
#
|
38
|
+
# f {
|
39
|
+
# a : 22
|
40
|
+
# b {
|
41
|
+
# d : 1
|
42
|
+
# x : 2
|
43
|
+
# }
|
44
|
+
# y : 13
|
45
|
+
# }
|
46
|
+
# z: 8
|
47
|
+
#
|
48
|
+
# The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
|
49
|
+
# (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
|
50
|
+
# output):
|
51
|
+
#
|
52
|
+
#
|
53
|
+
# f {
|
54
|
+
# a : 22
|
55
|
+
# b {
|
56
|
+
# d : 1
|
57
|
+
# }
|
58
|
+
# }
|
59
|
+
#
|
60
|
+
# A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
|
61
|
+
# paths string.
|
62
|
+
#
|
63
|
+
# If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
|
64
|
+
# operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
|
65
|
+
# had been specified).
|
66
|
+
#
|
67
|
+
# Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
|
68
|
+
# top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
|
69
|
+
# field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
|
70
|
+
# list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
|
71
|
+
# in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
|
72
|
+
# other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
|
73
|
+
# clearly documented together with its declaration in the API. In
|
74
|
+
# any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
|
75
|
+
# behavior for APIs.
|
76
|
+
#
|
77
|
+
# = Field Masks in Update Operations
|
78
|
+
#
|
79
|
+
# A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
|
80
|
+
# targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
|
81
|
+
# to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
|
82
|
+
# and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
|
83
|
+
# describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
|
84
|
+
# fields not covered by the mask.
|
85
|
+
#
|
86
|
+
# If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, the existing
|
87
|
+
# repeated values in the target resource will be overwritten by the new values.
|
88
|
+
# Note that a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths`
|
89
|
+
# string.
|
90
|
+
#
|
91
|
+
# If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
|
92
|
+
# update operation, then the existing sub-message in the target resource is
|
93
|
+
# overwritten. Given the target message:
|
94
|
+
#
|
95
|
+
# f {
|
96
|
+
# b {
|
97
|
+
# d : 1
|
98
|
+
# x : 2
|
99
|
+
# }
|
100
|
+
# c : 1
|
101
|
+
# }
|
102
|
+
#
|
103
|
+
# And an update message:
|
104
|
+
#
|
105
|
+
# f {
|
106
|
+
# b {
|
107
|
+
# d : 10
|
108
|
+
# }
|
109
|
+
# }
|
110
|
+
#
|
111
|
+
# then if the field mask is:
|
112
|
+
#
|
113
|
+
# paths: "f.b"
|
114
|
+
#
|
115
|
+
# then the result will be:
|
116
|
+
#
|
117
|
+
# f {
|
118
|
+
# b {
|
119
|
+
# d : 10
|
120
|
+
# }
|
121
|
+
# c : 1
|
122
|
+
# }
|
123
|
+
#
|
124
|
+
# However, if the update mask was:
|
125
|
+
#
|
126
|
+
# paths: "f.b.d"
|
127
|
+
#
|
128
|
+
# then the result would be:
|
129
|
+
#
|
130
|
+
# f {
|
131
|
+
# b {
|
132
|
+
# d : 10
|
133
|
+
# x : 2
|
134
|
+
# }
|
135
|
+
# c : 1
|
136
|
+
# }
|
137
|
+
#
|
138
|
+
# In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
|
139
|
+
# be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
|
140
|
+
# Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
|
141
|
+
# instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
|
142
|
+
# not provide a mask as described below.
|
143
|
+
#
|
144
|
+
# If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
|
145
|
+
# all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
|
146
|
+
# Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
|
147
|
+
# fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
|
148
|
+
# the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
|
149
|
+
# behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
|
150
|
+
# a field mask, producing an error if not.
|
151
|
+
#
|
152
|
+
# As with get operations, the location of the resource which
|
153
|
+
# describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
|
154
|
+
# operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
|
155
|
+
# required to be honored by the API.
|
156
|
+
#
|
157
|
+
# == Considerations for HTTP REST
|
158
|
+
#
|
159
|
+
# The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
|
160
|
+
# be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
|
161
|
+
# (PUT must only be used for full updates).
|
162
|
+
#
|
163
|
+
# = JSON Encoding of Field Masks
|
164
|
+
#
|
165
|
+
# In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
|
166
|
+
# separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
|
167
|
+
# to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
|
168
|
+
#
|
169
|
+
# As an example, consider the following message declarations:
|
170
|
+
#
|
171
|
+
# message Profile {
|
172
|
+
# User user = 1;
|
173
|
+
# Photo photo = 2;
|
174
|
+
# }
|
175
|
+
# message User {
|
176
|
+
# string display_name = 1;
|
177
|
+
# string address = 2;
|
178
|
+
# }
|
179
|
+
#
|
180
|
+
# In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
|
181
|
+
#
|
182
|
+
# mask {
|
183
|
+
# paths: "user.display_name"
|
184
|
+
# paths: "photo"
|
185
|
+
# }
|
186
|
+
#
|
187
|
+
# In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
|
188
|
+
#
|
189
|
+
# {
|
190
|
+
# mask: "user.displayName,photo"
|
191
|
+
# }
|
192
|
+
#
|
193
|
+
# = Field Masks and Oneof Fields
|
194
|
+
#
|
195
|
+
# Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
|
196
|
+
# following message:
|
197
|
+
#
|
198
|
+
# message SampleMessage {
|
199
|
+
# oneof test_oneof {
|
200
|
+
# string name = 4;
|
201
|
+
# SubMessage sub_message = 9;
|
202
|
+
# }
|
203
|
+
# }
|
204
|
+
#
|
205
|
+
# The field mask can be:
|
206
|
+
#
|
207
|
+
# mask {
|
208
|
+
# paths: "name"
|
209
|
+
# }
|
210
|
+
#
|
211
|
+
# Or:
|
212
|
+
#
|
213
|
+
# mask {
|
214
|
+
# paths: "sub_message"
|
215
|
+
# }
|
216
|
+
#
|
217
|
+
# Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
|
218
|
+
# paths.
|
219
|
+
#
|
220
|
+
# == Field Mask Verification
|
221
|
+
#
|
222
|
+
# The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
|
223
|
+
# request should verify the included field paths, and return an
|
224
|
+
# `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is duplicated or unmappable.
|
225
|
+
# @!attribute [rw] paths
|
226
|
+
# @return [Array<String>]
|
227
|
+
# The set of field mask paths.
|
228
|
+
class FieldMask; end
|
229
|
+
end
|
230
|
+
end
|
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
|
1
|
+
# Copyright 2018 Google LLC
|
2
|
+
#
|
3
|
+
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
4
|
+
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
5
|
+
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
6
|
+
#
|
7
|
+
# https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
8
|
+
#
|
9
|
+
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
10
|
+
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
11
|
+
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
12
|
+
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
13
|
+
# limitations under the License.
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
|
16
|
+
module Google
|
17
|
+
module Protobuf
|
18
|
+
# A Timestamp represents a point in time independent of any time zone
|
19
|
+
# or calendar, represented as seconds and fractions of seconds at
|
20
|
+
# nanosecond resolution in UTC Epoch time. It is encoded using the
|
21
|
+
# Proleptic Gregorian Calendar which extends the Gregorian calendar
|
22
|
+
# backwards to year one. It is encoded assuming all minutes are 60
|
23
|
+
# seconds long, i.e. leap seconds are "smeared" so that no leap second
|
24
|
+
# table is needed for interpretation. Range is from
|
25
|
+
# 0001-01-01T00:00:00Z to 9999-12-31T23:59:59.999999999Z.
|
26
|
+
# By restricting to that range, we ensure that we can convert to
|
27
|
+
# and from RFC 3339 date strings.
|
28
|
+
# See [https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt).
|
29
|
+
#
|
30
|
+
# = Examples
|
31
|
+
#
|
32
|
+
# Example 1: Compute Timestamp from POSIX `time()`.
|
33
|
+
#
|
34
|
+
# Timestamp timestamp;
|
35
|
+
# timestamp.set_seconds(time(NULL));
|
36
|
+
# timestamp.set_nanos(0);
|
37
|
+
#
|
38
|
+
# Example 2: Compute Timestamp from POSIX `gettimeofday()`.
|
39
|
+
#
|
40
|
+
# struct timeval tv;
|
41
|
+
# gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
|
42
|
+
#
|
43
|
+
# Timestamp timestamp;
|
44
|
+
# timestamp.set_seconds(tv.tv_sec);
|
45
|
+
# timestamp.set_nanos(tv.tv_usec * 1000);
|
46
|
+
#
|
47
|
+
# Example 3: Compute Timestamp from Win32 `GetSystemTimeAsFileTime()`.
|
48
|
+
#
|
49
|
+
# FILETIME ft;
|
50
|
+
# GetSystemTimeAsFileTime(&ft);
|
51
|
+
# UINT64 ticks = (((UINT64)ft.dwHighDateTime) << 32) | ft.dwLowDateTime;
|
52
|
+
#
|
53
|
+
# // A Windows tick is 100 nanoseconds. Windows epoch 1601-01-01T00:00:00Z
|
54
|
+
# // is 11644473600 seconds before Unix epoch 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
55
|
+
# Timestamp timestamp;
|
56
|
+
# timestamp.set_seconds((INT64) ((ticks / 10000000) - 11644473600LL));
|
57
|
+
# timestamp.set_nanos((INT32) ((ticks % 10000000) * 100));
|
58
|
+
#
|
59
|
+
# Example 4: Compute Timestamp from Java `System.currentTimeMillis()`.
|
60
|
+
#
|
61
|
+
# long millis = System.currentTimeMillis();
|
62
|
+
#
|
63
|
+
# Timestamp timestamp = Timestamp.newBuilder().setSeconds(millis / 1000)
|
64
|
+
# .setNanos((int) ((millis % 1000) * 1000000)).build();
|
65
|
+
#
|
66
|
+
#
|
67
|
+
# Example 5: Compute Timestamp from current time in Python.
|
68
|
+
#
|
69
|
+
# timestamp = Timestamp()
|
70
|
+
# timestamp.GetCurrentTime()
|
71
|
+
#
|
72
|
+
# = JSON Mapping
|
73
|
+
#
|
74
|
+
# In JSON format, the Timestamp type is encoded as a string in the
|
75
|
+
# [RFC 3339](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt) format. That is, the
|
76
|
+
# format is "{year}-{month}-{day}T{hour}:{min}:{sec}[.{frac_sec}]Z"
|
77
|
+
# where {year} is always expressed using four digits while {month}, {day},
|
78
|
+
# {hour}, {min}, and {sec} are zero-padded to two digits each. The fractional
|
79
|
+
# seconds, which can go up to 9 digits (i.e. up to 1 nanosecond resolution),
|
80
|
+
# are optional. The "Z" suffix indicates the timezone ("UTC"); the timezone
|
81
|
+
# is required. A proto3 JSON serializer should always use UTC (as indicated by
|
82
|
+
# "Z") when printing the Timestamp type and a proto3 JSON parser should be
|
83
|
+
# able to accept both UTC and other timezones (as indicated by an offset).
|
84
|
+
#
|
85
|
+
# For example, "2017-01-15T01:30:15.01Z" encodes 15.01 seconds past
|
86
|
+
# 01:30 UTC on January 15, 2017.
|
87
|
+
#
|
88
|
+
# In JavaScript, one can convert a Date object to this format using the
|
89
|
+
# standard [toISOString()](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Date/toISOString]
|
90
|
+
# method. In Python, a standard `datetime.datetime` object can be converted
|
91
|
+
# to this format using [`strftime`](https://docs.python.org/2/library/time.html#time.strftime)
|
92
|
+
# with the time format spec '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%fZ'. Likewise, in Java, one
|
93
|
+
# can use the Joda Time's [`ISODateTimeFormat.dateTime()`](
|
94
|
+
# http://www.joda.org/joda-time/apidocs/org/joda/time/format/ISODateTimeFormat.html#dateTime--
|
95
|
+
# ) to obtain a formatter capable of generating timestamps in this format.
|
96
|
+
# @!attribute [rw] seconds
|
97
|
+
# @return [Integer]
|
98
|
+
# Represents seconds of UTC time since Unix epoch
|
99
|
+
# 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z. Must be from 0001-01-01T00:00:00Z to
|
100
|
+
# 9999-12-31T23:59:59Z inclusive.
|
101
|
+
# @!attribute [rw] nanos
|
102
|
+
# @return [Integer]
|
103
|
+
# Non-negative fractions of a second at nanosecond resolution. Negative
|
104
|
+
# second values with fractions must still have non-negative nanos values
|
105
|
+
# that count forward in time. Must be from 0 to 999,999,999
|
106
|
+
# inclusive.
|
107
|
+
class Timestamp; end
|
108
|
+
end
|
109
|
+
end
|
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
|
1
|
+
# Copyright 2018 Google LLC
|
2
|
+
#
|
3
|
+
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
4
|
+
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
5
|
+
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
6
|
+
#
|
7
|
+
# https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
8
|
+
#
|
9
|
+
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
10
|
+
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
11
|
+
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
12
|
+
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
13
|
+
# limitations under the License.
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
|
16
|
+
module Google
|
17
|
+
module Rpc
|
18
|
+
# The `Status` type defines a logical error model that is suitable for different
|
19
|
+
# programming environments, including REST APIs and RPC APIs. It is used by
|
20
|
+
# [gRPC](https://github.com/grpc). The error model is designed to be:
|
21
|
+
#
|
22
|
+
# * Simple to use and understand for most users
|
23
|
+
# * Flexible enough to meet unexpected needs
|
24
|
+
#
|
25
|
+
# = Overview
|
26
|
+
#
|
27
|
+
# The `Status` message contains three pieces of data: error code, error message,
|
28
|
+
# and error details. The error code should be an enum value of
|
29
|
+
# {Google::Rpc::Code}, but it may accept additional error codes if needed. The
|
30
|
+
# error message should be a developer-facing English message that helps
|
31
|
+
# developers *understand* and *resolve* the error. If a localized user-facing
|
32
|
+
# error message is needed, put the localized message in the error details or
|
33
|
+
# localize it in the client. The optional error details may contain arbitrary
|
34
|
+
# information about the error. There is a predefined set of error detail types
|
35
|
+
# in the package `google.rpc` that can be used for common error conditions.
|
36
|
+
#
|
37
|
+
# = Language mapping
|
38
|
+
#
|
39
|
+
# The `Status` message is the logical representation of the error model, but it
|
40
|
+
# is not necessarily the actual wire format. When the `Status` message is
|
41
|
+
# exposed in different client libraries and different wire protocols, it can be
|
42
|
+
# mapped differently. For example, it will likely be mapped to some exceptions
|
43
|
+
# in Java, but more likely mapped to some error codes in C.
|
44
|
+
#
|
45
|
+
# = Other uses
|
46
|
+
#
|
47
|
+
# The error model and the `Status` message can be used in a variety of
|
48
|
+
# environments, either with or without APIs, to provide a
|
49
|
+
# consistent developer experience across different environments.
|
50
|
+
#
|
51
|
+
# Example uses of this error model include:
|
52
|
+
#
|
53
|
+
# * Partial errors. If a service needs to return partial errors to the client,
|
54
|
+
# it may embed the `Status` in the normal response to indicate the partial
|
55
|
+
# errors.
|
56
|
+
#
|
57
|
+
# * Workflow errors. A typical workflow has multiple steps. Each step may
|
58
|
+
# have a `Status` message for error reporting.
|
59
|
+
#
|
60
|
+
# * Batch operations. If a client uses batch request and batch response, the
|
61
|
+
# `Status` message should be used directly inside batch response, one for
|
62
|
+
# each error sub-response.
|
63
|
+
#
|
64
|
+
# * Asynchronous operations. If an API call embeds asynchronous operation
|
65
|
+
# results in its response, the status of those operations should be
|
66
|
+
# represented directly using the `Status` message.
|
67
|
+
#
|
68
|
+
# * Logging. If some API errors are stored in logs, the message `Status` could
|
69
|
+
# be used directly after any stripping needed for security/privacy reasons.
|
70
|
+
# @!attribute [rw] code
|
71
|
+
# @return [Integer]
|
72
|
+
# The status code, which should be an enum value of {Google::Rpc::Code}.
|
73
|
+
# @!attribute [rw] message
|
74
|
+
# @return [String]
|
75
|
+
# A developer-facing error message, which should be in English. Any
|
76
|
+
# user-facing error message should be localized and sent in the
|
77
|
+
# {Google::Rpc::Status#details} field, or localized by the client.
|
78
|
+
# @!attribute [rw] details
|
79
|
+
# @return [Array<Google::Protobuf::Any>]
|
80
|
+
# A list of messages that carry the error details. There is a common set of
|
81
|
+
# message types for APIs to use.
|
82
|
+
class Status; end
|
83
|
+
end
|
84
|
+
end
|