google-cloud-iap-v1 0.1.0

Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
1
+ # frozen_string_literal: true
2
+
3
+ # Copyright 2021 Google LLC
4
+ #
5
+ # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
6
+ # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
7
+ # You may obtain a copy of the License at
8
+ #
9
+ # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
10
+ #
11
+ # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
12
+ # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
13
+ # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
14
+ # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
15
+ # limitations under the License.
16
+
17
+ # Auto-generated by gapic-generator-ruby. DO NOT EDIT!
18
+
19
+
20
+ module Google
21
+ module Iam
22
+ module V1
23
+ # Defines an Identity and Access Management (IAM) policy. It is used to
24
+ # specify access control policies for Cloud Platform resources.
25
+ #
26
+ #
27
+ # A `Policy` is a collection of `bindings`. A `binding` binds one or more
28
+ # `members` to a single `role`. Members can be user accounts, service accounts,
29
+ # Google groups, and domains (such as G Suite). A `role` is a named list of
30
+ # permissions (defined by IAM or configured by users). A `binding` can
31
+ # optionally specify a `condition`, which is a logic expression that further
32
+ # constrains the role binding based on attributes about the request and/or
33
+ # target resource.
34
+ #
35
+ # **JSON Example**
36
+ #
37
+ # {
38
+ # "bindings": [
39
+ # {
40
+ # "role": "roles/resourcemanager.organizationAdmin",
41
+ # "members": [
42
+ # "user:mike@example.com",
43
+ # "group:admins@example.com",
44
+ # "domain:google.com",
45
+ # "serviceAccount:my-project-id@appspot.gserviceaccount.com"
46
+ # ]
47
+ # },
48
+ # {
49
+ # "role": "roles/resourcemanager.organizationViewer",
50
+ # "members": ["user:eve@example.com"],
51
+ # "condition": {
52
+ # "title": "expirable access",
53
+ # "description": "Does not grant access after Sep 2020",
54
+ # "expression": "request.time <
55
+ # timestamp('2020-10-01T00:00:00.000Z')",
56
+ # }
57
+ # }
58
+ # ]
59
+ # }
60
+ #
61
+ # **YAML Example**
62
+ #
63
+ # bindings:
64
+ # - members:
65
+ # - user:mike@example.com
66
+ # - group:admins@example.com
67
+ # - domain:google.com
68
+ # - serviceAccount:my-project-id@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
69
+ # role: roles/resourcemanager.organizationAdmin
70
+ # - members:
71
+ # - user:eve@example.com
72
+ # role: roles/resourcemanager.organizationViewer
73
+ # condition:
74
+ # title: expirable access
75
+ # description: Does not grant access after Sep 2020
76
+ # expression: request.time < timestamp('2020-10-01T00:00:00.000Z')
77
+ #
78
+ # For a description of IAM and its features, see the
79
+ # [IAM developer's guide](https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs).
80
+ # @!attribute [rw] version
81
+ # @return [::Integer]
82
+ # Specifies the format of the policy.
83
+ #
84
+ # Valid values are 0, 1, and 3. Requests specifying an invalid value will be
85
+ # rejected.
86
+ #
87
+ # Operations affecting conditional bindings must specify version 3. This can
88
+ # be either setting a conditional policy, modifying a conditional binding,
89
+ # or removing a binding (conditional or unconditional) from the stored
90
+ # conditional policy.
91
+ # Operations on non-conditional policies may specify any valid value or
92
+ # leave the field unset.
93
+ #
94
+ # If no etag is provided in the call to `setIamPolicy`, version compliance
95
+ # checks against the stored policy is skipped.
96
+ # @!attribute [rw] bindings
97
+ # @return [::Array<::Google::Iam::V1::Binding>]
98
+ # Associates a list of `members` to a `role`. Optionally may specify a
99
+ # `condition` that determines when binding is in effect.
100
+ # `bindings` with no members will result in an error.
101
+ # @!attribute [rw] etag
102
+ # @return [::String]
103
+ # `etag` is used for optimistic concurrency control as a way to help
104
+ # prevent simultaneous updates of a policy from overwriting each other.
105
+ # It is strongly suggested that systems make use of the `etag` in the
106
+ # read-modify-write cycle to perform policy updates in order to avoid race
107
+ # conditions: An `etag` is returned in the response to `getIamPolicy`, and
108
+ # systems are expected to put that etag in the request to `setIamPolicy` to
109
+ # ensure that their change will be applied to the same version of the policy.
110
+ #
111
+ # If no `etag` is provided in the call to `setIamPolicy`, then the existing
112
+ # policy is overwritten. Due to blind-set semantics of an etag-less policy,
113
+ # 'setIamPolicy' will not fail even if the incoming policy version does not
114
+ # meet the requirements for modifying the stored policy.
115
+ class Policy
116
+ include ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts
117
+ extend ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts::ClassMethods
118
+ end
119
+
120
+ # Associates `members` with a `role`.
121
+ # @!attribute [rw] role
122
+ # @return [::String]
123
+ # Role that is assigned to `members`.
124
+ # For example, `roles/viewer`, `roles/editor`, or `roles/owner`.
125
+ # @!attribute [rw] members
126
+ # @return [::Array<::String>]
127
+ # Specifies the identities requesting access for a Cloud Platform resource.
128
+ # `members` can have the following values:
129
+ #
130
+ # * `allUsers`: A special identifier that represents anyone who is
131
+ # on the internet; with or without a Google account.
132
+ #
133
+ # * `allAuthenticatedUsers`: A special identifier that represents anyone
134
+ # who is authenticated with a Google account or a service account.
135
+ #
136
+ # * `user:{emailid}`: An email address that represents a specific Google
137
+ # account. For example, `alice@example.com` .
138
+ #
139
+ #
140
+ # * `serviceAccount:{emailid}`: An email address that represents a service
141
+ # account. For example, `my-other-app@appspot.gserviceaccount.com`.
142
+ #
143
+ # * `group:{emailid}`: An email address that represents a Google group.
144
+ # For example, `admins@example.com`.
145
+ #
146
+ #
147
+ # * `domain:{domain}`: The G Suite domain (primary) that represents all the
148
+ # users of that domain. For example, `google.com` or `example.com`.
149
+ # @!attribute [rw] condition
150
+ # @return [::Google::Type::Expr]
151
+ # The condition that is associated with this binding.
152
+ # NOTE: An unsatisfied condition will not allow user access via current
153
+ # binding. Different bindings, including their conditions, are examined
154
+ # independently.
155
+ class Binding
156
+ include ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts
157
+ extend ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts::ClassMethods
158
+ end
159
+
160
+ # The difference delta between two policies.
161
+ # @!attribute [rw] binding_deltas
162
+ # @return [::Array<::Google::Iam::V1::BindingDelta>]
163
+ # The delta for Bindings between two policies.
164
+ # @!attribute [rw] audit_config_deltas
165
+ # @return [::Array<::Google::Iam::V1::AuditConfigDelta>]
166
+ # The delta for AuditConfigs between two policies.
167
+ class PolicyDelta
168
+ include ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts
169
+ extend ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts::ClassMethods
170
+ end
171
+
172
+ # One delta entry for Binding. Each individual change (only one member in each
173
+ # entry) to a binding will be a separate entry.
174
+ # @!attribute [rw] action
175
+ # @return [::Google::Iam::V1::BindingDelta::Action]
176
+ # The action that was performed on a Binding.
177
+ # Required
178
+ # @!attribute [rw] role
179
+ # @return [::String]
180
+ # Role that is assigned to `members`.
181
+ # For example, `roles/viewer`, `roles/editor`, or `roles/owner`.
182
+ # Required
183
+ # @!attribute [rw] member
184
+ # @return [::String]
185
+ # A single identity requesting access for a Cloud Platform resource.
186
+ # Follows the same format of Binding.members.
187
+ # Required
188
+ # @!attribute [rw] condition
189
+ # @return [::Google::Type::Expr]
190
+ # The condition that is associated with this binding.
191
+ class BindingDelta
192
+ include ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts
193
+ extend ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts::ClassMethods
194
+
195
+ # The type of action performed on a Binding in a policy.
196
+ module Action
197
+ # Unspecified.
198
+ ACTION_UNSPECIFIED = 0
199
+
200
+ # Addition of a Binding.
201
+ ADD = 1
202
+
203
+ # Removal of a Binding.
204
+ REMOVE = 2
205
+ end
206
+ end
207
+
208
+ # One delta entry for AuditConfig. Each individual change (only one
209
+ # exempted_member in each entry) to a AuditConfig will be a separate entry.
210
+ # @!attribute [rw] action
211
+ # @return [::Google::Iam::V1::AuditConfigDelta::Action]
212
+ # The action that was performed on an audit configuration in a policy.
213
+ # Required
214
+ # @!attribute [rw] service
215
+ # @return [::String]
216
+ # Specifies a service that was configured for Cloud Audit Logging.
217
+ # For example, `storage.googleapis.com`, `cloudsql.googleapis.com`.
218
+ # `allServices` is a special value that covers all services.
219
+ # Required
220
+ # @!attribute [rw] exempted_member
221
+ # @return [::String]
222
+ # A single identity that is exempted from "data access" audit
223
+ # logging for the `service` specified above.
224
+ # Follows the same format of Binding.members.
225
+ # @!attribute [rw] log_type
226
+ # @return [::String]
227
+ # Specifies the log_type that was be enabled. ADMIN_ACTIVITY is always
228
+ # enabled, and cannot be configured.
229
+ # Required
230
+ class AuditConfigDelta
231
+ include ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts
232
+ extend ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts::ClassMethods
233
+
234
+ # The type of action performed on an audit configuration in a policy.
235
+ module Action
236
+ # Unspecified.
237
+ ACTION_UNSPECIFIED = 0
238
+
239
+ # Addition of an audit configuration.
240
+ ADD = 1
241
+
242
+ # Removal of an audit configuration.
243
+ REMOVE = 2
244
+ end
245
+ end
246
+ end
247
+ end
248
+ end
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
1
+ # frozen_string_literal: true
2
+
3
+ # Copyright 2021 Google LLC
4
+ #
5
+ # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
6
+ # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
7
+ # You may obtain a copy of the License at
8
+ #
9
+ # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
10
+ #
11
+ # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
12
+ # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
13
+ # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
14
+ # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
15
+ # limitations under the License.
16
+
17
+ # Auto-generated by gapic-generator-ruby. DO NOT EDIT!
18
+
19
+
20
+ module Google
21
+ module Protobuf
22
+ # A generic empty message that you can re-use to avoid defining duplicated
23
+ # empty messages in your APIs. A typical example is to use it as the request
24
+ # or the response type of an API method. For instance:
25
+ #
26
+ # service Foo {
27
+ # rpc Bar(google.protobuf.Empty) returns (google.protobuf.Empty);
28
+ # }
29
+ #
30
+ # The JSON representation for `Empty` is empty JSON object `{}`.
31
+ class Empty
32
+ include ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts
33
+ extend ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts::ClassMethods
34
+ end
35
+ end
36
+ end
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
1
+ # frozen_string_literal: true
2
+
3
+ # Copyright 2021 Google LLC
4
+ #
5
+ # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
6
+ # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
7
+ # You may obtain a copy of the License at
8
+ #
9
+ # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
10
+ #
11
+ # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
12
+ # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
13
+ # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
14
+ # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
15
+ # limitations under the License.
16
+
17
+ # Auto-generated by gapic-generator-ruby. DO NOT EDIT!
18
+
19
+
20
+ module Google
21
+ module Protobuf
22
+ # `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
23
+ #
24
+ # paths: "f.a"
25
+ # paths: "f.b.d"
26
+ #
27
+ # Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
28
+ # fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
29
+ # message in `f.b`.
30
+ #
31
+ # Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
32
+ # returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
33
+ # Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
34
+ #
35
+ # # Field Masks in Projections
36
+ #
37
+ # When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
38
+ # sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
39
+ # specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
40
+ # example is applied to a response message as follows:
41
+ #
42
+ # f {
43
+ # a : 22
44
+ # b {
45
+ # d : 1
46
+ # x : 2
47
+ # }
48
+ # y : 13
49
+ # }
50
+ # z: 8
51
+ #
52
+ # The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
53
+ # (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
54
+ # output):
55
+ #
56
+ #
57
+ # f {
58
+ # a : 22
59
+ # b {
60
+ # d : 1
61
+ # }
62
+ # }
63
+ #
64
+ # A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
65
+ # paths string.
66
+ #
67
+ # If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
68
+ # operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
69
+ # had been specified).
70
+ #
71
+ # Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
72
+ # top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
73
+ # field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
74
+ # list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
75
+ # in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
76
+ # other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
77
+ # clearly documented together with its declaration in the API. In
78
+ # any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
79
+ # behavior for APIs.
80
+ #
81
+ # # Field Masks in Update Operations
82
+ #
83
+ # A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
84
+ # targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
85
+ # to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
86
+ # and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
87
+ # describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
88
+ # fields not covered by the mask.
89
+ #
90
+ # If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
91
+ # be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
92
+ # a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
93
+ #
94
+ # If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
95
+ # update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
96
+ # in the target resource.
97
+ #
98
+ # For example, given the target message:
99
+ #
100
+ # f {
101
+ # b {
102
+ # d: 1
103
+ # x: 2
104
+ # }
105
+ # c: [1]
106
+ # }
107
+ #
108
+ # And an update message:
109
+ #
110
+ # f {
111
+ # b {
112
+ # d: 10
113
+ # }
114
+ # c: [2]
115
+ # }
116
+ #
117
+ # then if the field mask is:
118
+ #
119
+ # paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
120
+ #
121
+ # then the result will be:
122
+ #
123
+ # f {
124
+ # b {
125
+ # d: 10
126
+ # x: 2
127
+ # }
128
+ # c: [1, 2]
129
+ # }
130
+ #
131
+ # An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
132
+ # repeated and message fields.
133
+ #
134
+ # In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
135
+ # be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
136
+ # Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
137
+ # instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
138
+ # not provide a mask as described below.
139
+ #
140
+ # If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
141
+ # all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
142
+ # Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
143
+ # fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
144
+ # the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
145
+ # behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
146
+ # a field mask, producing an error if not.
147
+ #
148
+ # As with get operations, the location of the resource which
149
+ # describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
150
+ # operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
151
+ # required to be honored by the API.
152
+ #
153
+ # ## Considerations for HTTP REST
154
+ #
155
+ # The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
156
+ # be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
157
+ # (PUT must only be used for full updates).
158
+ #
159
+ # # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
160
+ #
161
+ # In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
162
+ # separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
163
+ # to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
164
+ #
165
+ # As an example, consider the following message declarations:
166
+ #
167
+ # message Profile {
168
+ # User user = 1;
169
+ # Photo photo = 2;
170
+ # }
171
+ # message User {
172
+ # string display_name = 1;
173
+ # string address = 2;
174
+ # }
175
+ #
176
+ # In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
177
+ #
178
+ # mask {
179
+ # paths: "user.display_name"
180
+ # paths: "photo"
181
+ # }
182
+ #
183
+ # In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
184
+ #
185
+ # {
186
+ # mask: "user.displayName,photo"
187
+ # }
188
+ #
189
+ # # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
190
+ #
191
+ # Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
192
+ # following message:
193
+ #
194
+ # message SampleMessage {
195
+ # oneof test_oneof {
196
+ # string name = 4;
197
+ # SubMessage sub_message = 9;
198
+ # }
199
+ # }
200
+ #
201
+ # The field mask can be:
202
+ #
203
+ # mask {
204
+ # paths: "name"
205
+ # }
206
+ #
207
+ # Or:
208
+ #
209
+ # mask {
210
+ # paths: "sub_message"
211
+ # }
212
+ #
213
+ # Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
214
+ # paths.
215
+ #
216
+ # ## Field Mask Verification
217
+ #
218
+ # The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
219
+ # request should verify the included field paths, and return an
220
+ # `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is unmappable.
221
+ # @!attribute [rw] paths
222
+ # @return [::Array<::String>]
223
+ # The set of field mask paths.
224
+ class FieldMask
225
+ include ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts
226
+ extend ::Google::Protobuf::MessageExts::ClassMethods
227
+ end
228
+ end
229
+ end