gmp 0.6.47 → 0.7.19
Sign up to get free protection for your applications and to get access to all the features.
- checksums.yaml +7 -0
- data/CHANGELOG +21 -1
- data/README.markdown +29 -9
- data/ext/extconf.rb +8 -0
- data/ext/gmp.c +7 -7
- data/ext/gmpf.c +620 -139
- data/ext/gmpq.c +218 -90
- data/ext/gmprandstate.c +57 -53
- data/ext/gmpz.c +492 -440
- data/ext/mprnd.c +44 -35
- data/ext/ruby_gmp.h +6 -6
- data/manual.pdf +0 -0
- data/manual.tex +2 -2
- data/test/mpfr_thypot.rb +60 -0
- data/test/tc_cmp.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_constants.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_division.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_f_abs_neg.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_f_arithmetics_coersion.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_f_precision.rb +2 -1
- data/test/tc_f_to_s.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_hashes.rb +1 -4
- data/test/tc_mpfr_cmp.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_mpfr_constants.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_mpfr_functions.rb +43 -10
- data/test/tc_mpfr_inf_nan_zero.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_mpfr_integer.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_mpfr_new_rounding.rb +24 -1
- data/test/tc_mpfr_pow.rb +17 -0
- data/test/tc_mpfr_random.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_mpfr_rounding.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_q.rb +53 -32
- data/test/tc_q_basic.rb +1 -1
- data/test/{tc_floor_ceil_truncate.rb → tc_q_floor_ceil_truncate.rb} +2 -2
- data/test/tc_q_num_den.rb +18 -0
- data/test/tc_random.rb +1 -4
- data/test/tc_sgn_neg_abs.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_swap.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_z.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_z_addmul.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_z_basic.rb +3 -2
- data/test/tc_z_exponentiation.rb +5 -5
- data/test/tc_z_export_import.rb +1 -1
- data/test/{tc_fib_fac_nextprime.rb → tc_z_fib_fac_nextprime.rb} +1 -1
- data/test/tc_z_functional_mappings.rb +2 -2
- data/test/tc_z_gcd_lcm_invert.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_z_hamdist.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_z_io.rb +2 -1
- data/test/tc_z_jac_leg_rem.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_z_logic.rb +1 -1
- data/test/{tc_logical_roots.rb → tc_z_logical_roots.rb} +7 -7
- data/test/tc_z_shifts_last_bits.rb +2 -2
- data/test/tc_z_submul.rb +1 -1
- data/test/tc_z_to_dis.rb +1 -1
- data/test/{tc_zerodivisionexceptions.rb → tc_zero_division_exceptions.rb} +2 -2
- data/test/unit_tests.rb +30 -17
- metadata +16 -16
- data/INSTALL +0 -4
data/test/tc_mpfr_integer.rb
CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
1
1
|
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
2
|
|
3
|
-
class
|
3
|
+
class TcMpfrInteger < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
4
4
|
def test_mpfr_integer_positive
|
5
5
|
assert(GMP::F(1.0).integer?, "MPFR should decide whether a number is an integer correctly.")
|
6
6
|
assert(GMP::F(2.0).integer?, "MPFR should decide whether a number is an integer correctly.")
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
1
1
|
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
2
|
|
3
|
-
class
|
3
|
+
class TcMpfrNewRounding < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
4
4
|
def test_new_fixnum
|
5
5
|
ninety_six = GMP::F(96, 4)
|
6
6
|
one_hundred_four = GMP::F(104, 4)
|
@@ -103,6 +103,29 @@ class TC_MPFR_New_Rounding < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
|
103
103
|
assert_equal(a, oh107, "GMP::F.new should round with RNDU")
|
104
104
|
end
|
105
105
|
|
106
|
+
def test_new_string
|
107
|
+
ohoh977 = GMP::F(0.977e-2, 4)
|
108
|
+
oh107 = GMP::F(0.107e-1, 4)
|
109
|
+
|
110
|
+
a = GMP::F("0.01", 4)
|
111
|
+
assert_equal(a, ohoh977, "GMP::F.new should default round with RNDN")
|
112
|
+
|
113
|
+
a = GMP::F("0.01", 4, 10)
|
114
|
+
assert_equal(a, ohoh977, "GMP::F.new should default round with RNDN")
|
115
|
+
|
116
|
+
a = GMP::F("0.01", 4, 10, GMP::GMP_RNDN)
|
117
|
+
assert_equal(a, ohoh977, "GMP::F.new should round with RNDN")
|
118
|
+
|
119
|
+
a = GMP::F("0.01", 4, 10, GMP::GMP_RNDD)
|
120
|
+
assert_equal(a, ohoh977, "GMP::F.new should round with RNDD")
|
121
|
+
|
122
|
+
a = GMP::F("0.01", 4, 10, GMP::GMP_RNDZ)
|
123
|
+
assert_equal(a, ohoh977, "GMP::F.new should round with RNDZ")
|
124
|
+
|
125
|
+
a = GMP::F("0.01", 4, 10, GMP::GMP_RNDU)
|
126
|
+
assert_equal(a, oh107, "GMP::F.new should round with RNDU")
|
127
|
+
end
|
128
|
+
|
106
129
|
def test_new_mpfr
|
107
130
|
ohoh977 = GMP::F(-0.977e-2, 4)
|
108
131
|
oh107 = GMP::F(-0.107e-1, 4)
|
data/test/tc_mpfr_pow.rb
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
|
1
|
+
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
class TcMpfrPow < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
4
|
+
def setup
|
5
|
+
@a = GMP::F(0.25)
|
6
|
+
end
|
7
|
+
|
8
|
+
def test_mpfr_pow
|
9
|
+
assert_equal(@a ** 2, 0.0625, "GMP::F#pow(x : Fixnum) calculates correctly.")
|
10
|
+
assert_equal(@a ** -2, 16, "GMP::F#pow(x : Fixnum) calculates correctly.")
|
11
|
+
assert_equal(@a ** 0, 1, "GMP::F#pow(x : Fixnum) calculates correctly.")
|
12
|
+
assert_equal(@a ** 0.5, 0.5, "GMP::F#pow(x : Float) calculates correctly.")
|
13
|
+
assert_equal(@a ** 0.0, 1, "GMP::F#pow(x : Float) calculates correctly.")
|
14
|
+
assert_equal(@a ** GMP::Z(2), 0.0625, "GMP::F#pow(x : GMP::Z) calculates correctly.")
|
15
|
+
assert_equal(@a ** GMP::Q(1, 2), 0.5, "GMP::F#pow(x : GMP::Q) calculates correctly.")
|
16
|
+
end
|
17
|
+
end
|
data/test/tc_mpfr_random.rb
CHANGED
data/test/tc_mpfr_rounding.rb
CHANGED
data/test/tc_q.rb
CHANGED
@@ -1,18 +1,25 @@
|
|
1
1
|
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
2
|
|
3
|
-
class
|
3
|
+
class TcRational < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
4
|
+
def setup
|
5
|
+
@z_1 = GMP::Z(1)
|
6
|
+
@z_2 = GMP::Z(2)
|
7
|
+
@z_neg_11 = GMP::Z(-11)
|
8
|
+
|
9
|
+
end
|
10
|
+
|
4
11
|
def test_init_null
|
5
12
|
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(), 0, "GMP::Q.new() should initialize to 0")
|
6
13
|
end
|
7
14
|
|
8
15
|
def test_init_fixnum
|
9
|
-
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(1),
|
16
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new( 1), 1, "GMP::Q.new(x) should accept a Fixnum")
|
17
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(-11), -11, "GMP::Q.new(x) should accept a negative Fixnum")
|
10
18
|
end
|
11
19
|
|
12
|
-
def
|
13
|
-
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(
|
14
|
-
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(
|
15
|
-
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(2, 4).to_s, "1/2", "GMP::Q.new(num : Fixnum, den : Fixnum) should initialize to num/den")
|
20
|
+
def test_init_z
|
21
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(@z_1), 1, "GMP::Q.new(x) should accept a GMP::Z")
|
22
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(@z_neg_11), -11, "GMP::Q.new(x) should accept a negative GMP::Z")
|
16
23
|
end
|
17
24
|
|
18
25
|
def test_init_string
|
@@ -21,33 +28,47 @@ class TC_Q < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
|
21
28
|
end
|
22
29
|
|
23
30
|
def test_init_q
|
24
|
-
a = GMP::Q.new(1,2)
|
31
|
+
a = GMP::Q.new(1, 2)
|
25
32
|
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(a), a, "GMP::Q.new(x : Q) should initialize to x")
|
26
33
|
end
|
34
|
+
|
35
|
+
def test_init_pair
|
36
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(1, 2).to_s, "1/2", "GMP::Q.new(n : Fixnum, d : Fixnum) initializes correctly")
|
37
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(1, 3).to_s, "1/3", "GMP::Q.new(n : Fixnum, d : Fixnum) initializes correctly")
|
38
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(2, 4).to_s, "1/2", "GMP::Q.new(n : Fixnum, d : Fixnum) initializes correctly")
|
39
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(1, 2).to_s, "1/2", "GMP::Q.new(n : Fixnum, d : Fixnum) initializes correctly")
|
40
|
+
|
41
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(@z_1, 2).to_s, "1/2", "GMP::Q.new(n : GMP::Z, d : Fixnum) initializes correctly")
|
42
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Q.new(@z_1, @z_2).to_s, "1/2", "GMP::Q.new(n : GMP::Z, d : GMP::Z) initializes correctly")
|
43
|
+
end
|
44
|
+
|
45
|
+
def test_bad_init
|
46
|
+
assert_raise(ArgumentError) { GMP::Q.new(1, 2, 3) }
|
47
|
+
end
|
27
48
|
|
28
49
|
def test_neg
|
29
|
-
a = GMP::Q( 1,2)
|
30
|
-
neg_a = GMP::Q(-1,2)
|
50
|
+
a = GMP::Q( 1, 2)
|
51
|
+
neg_a = GMP::Q(-1, 2)
|
31
52
|
assert_equal(neg_a, -a, "GMP::Q#-@ should work.")
|
32
53
|
assert_equal(neg_a, a.neg, "GMP::Q#neg should work.")
|
33
54
|
a.neg!
|
34
55
|
assert_equal(neg_a, a, "GMP::Q#neg! should work.")
|
35
56
|
|
36
|
-
|
37
|
-
neg_b = GMP::Q( 4,3)
|
57
|
+
b = GMP::Q(-4, 3)
|
58
|
+
neg_b = GMP::Q( 4, 3)
|
38
59
|
assert_equal(neg_b, -b, "GMP::Q#-@ should work.")
|
39
60
|
assert_equal(neg_b, b.neg, "GMP::Q#neg should work.")
|
40
61
|
b.neg!
|
41
62
|
assert_equal(neg_b, b, "GMP::Q#neg! should work.")
|
42
63
|
|
43
|
-
|
64
|
+
c = GMP::Q( "9753108642/2")
|
44
65
|
neg_c = GMP::Q("-9753108642/2")
|
45
66
|
assert_equal(neg_c, -c, "GMP::Q#-@ should work.")
|
46
67
|
assert_equal(neg_c, c.neg, "GMP::Q#neg should work.")
|
47
68
|
c.neg!
|
48
69
|
assert_equal(neg_c, c, "GMP::Q#neg! should work.")
|
49
70
|
|
50
|
-
|
71
|
+
d = GMP::Q(0)
|
51
72
|
neg_d = GMP::Q(0)
|
52
73
|
assert_equal(neg_d, -d, "GMP::Q#-@ should work.")
|
53
74
|
assert_equal(neg_d, d.neg, "GMP::Q#neg should work.")
|
@@ -56,25 +77,25 @@ class TC_Q < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
|
56
77
|
end
|
57
78
|
|
58
79
|
def test_abs
|
59
|
-
|
60
|
-
abs_a = GMP::Q(1,2)
|
80
|
+
a = GMP::Q(1, 2)
|
81
|
+
abs_a = GMP::Q(1, 2)
|
61
82
|
assert_equal(abs_a, a.abs, "GMP::Q#abs should work.")
|
62
83
|
a.abs!
|
63
84
|
assert_equal(abs_a, a, "GMP::Q#abs! should work.")
|
64
85
|
|
65
|
-
|
66
|
-
abs_b = GMP::Q( 4,3)
|
86
|
+
b = GMP::Q(-4, 3)
|
87
|
+
abs_b = GMP::Q( 4, 3)
|
67
88
|
assert_equal(abs_b, b.abs, "GMP::Q#abs should work.")
|
68
89
|
b.abs!
|
69
90
|
assert_equal(abs_b, b, "GMP::Q#abs! should work.")
|
70
91
|
|
71
|
-
|
92
|
+
c = GMP::Q("9753108642/2")
|
72
93
|
abs_c = GMP::Q("9753108642/2")
|
73
94
|
assert_equal(abs_c, c.abs, "GMP::Q#abs should work.")
|
74
95
|
c.abs!
|
75
96
|
assert_equal(abs_c, c, "GMP::Q#abs! should work.")
|
76
97
|
|
77
|
-
|
98
|
+
d = GMP::Q(0)
|
78
99
|
abs_d = GMP::Q(0)
|
79
100
|
assert_equal(abs_d, d.abs, "GMP::Q#abs should work.")
|
80
101
|
d.abs!
|
@@ -82,19 +103,19 @@ class TC_Q < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
|
82
103
|
end
|
83
104
|
|
84
105
|
def test_inv
|
85
|
-
|
106
|
+
a = GMP::Q(1,2)
|
86
107
|
inv_a = GMP::Q(2,1)
|
87
108
|
assert_equal(inv_a, a.inv, "GMP::Q#inv should work.")
|
88
109
|
a.inv!
|
89
110
|
assert_equal(inv_a, a, "GMP::Q#inv! should work.")
|
90
111
|
|
91
|
-
|
112
|
+
b = GMP::Q(-4,3)
|
92
113
|
inv_b = GMP::Q(-3,4)
|
93
114
|
assert_equal(inv_b, b.inv, "GMP::Q#inv should work.")
|
94
115
|
b.inv!
|
95
116
|
assert_equal(inv_b, b, "GMP::Q#inv! should work.")
|
96
117
|
|
97
|
-
|
118
|
+
c = GMP::Q("9753108642/2")
|
98
119
|
inv_c = GMP::Q("2/9753108642")
|
99
120
|
assert_equal(inv_c, c.inv, "GMP::Q#inv should work.")
|
100
121
|
c.inv!
|
@@ -106,16 +127,16 @@ class TC_Q < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
|
106
127
|
end
|
107
128
|
|
108
129
|
def test_to_s
|
109
|
-
assert_equal("1/2", GMP::Q(1,2).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
110
|
-
assert_equal("1/4294967296", GMP::Q(1,2**32).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
111
|
-
assert_equal("1/4294967296", GMP::Q(1,2**32).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
112
|
-
assert_equal("-22/7", GMP::Q(-22,7).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
113
|
-
assert_equal("-22/7", GMP::Q(22
|
114
|
-
assert_equal("22/7", GMP::Q(-22
|
115
|
-
assert_equal("0", GMP::Q(0,1).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
116
|
-
assert_equal("0", GMP::Q(0,2000).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
117
|
-
assert_equal("0", GMP::Q(0
|
130
|
+
assert_equal("1/2", GMP::Q(1, 2).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
131
|
+
assert_equal("1/4294967296", GMP::Q(1, 2**32).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
132
|
+
assert_equal("1/4294967296", GMP::Q(1, 2**32).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
133
|
+
assert_equal("-22/7", GMP::Q(-22, 7).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
134
|
+
assert_equal("-22/7", GMP::Q(22, -7).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
135
|
+
assert_equal("22/7", GMP::Q(-22, -7).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
136
|
+
assert_equal("0", GMP::Q(0, 1).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
137
|
+
assert_equal("0", GMP::Q(0, 2000).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
138
|
+
assert_equal("0", GMP::Q(0, -2000).to_s, "GMP::Q should to_s properly.")
|
118
139
|
|
119
|
-
assert_equal("1/2", GMP::Q(1,2).inspect, "GMP::Q should inspect properly.")
|
140
|
+
assert_equal("1/2", GMP::Q(1, 2).inspect, "GMP::Q should inspect properly.")
|
120
141
|
end
|
121
142
|
end
|
data/test/tc_q_basic.rb
CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
1
1
|
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
2
|
|
3
3
|
# [Q op Q, Q op Z, Z op Q, Q op FixNum, Q op BigNum, FixNum op Q, BigNum op Q]
|
4
|
-
class
|
4
|
+
class TcRationalBasic < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
5
5
|
def setup
|
6
6
|
@a=GMP::Q.new(100,11)
|
7
7
|
@b=GMP::Q.new(200,17)
|
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
|
|
1
1
|
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
2
|
|
3
|
-
class
|
3
|
+
class TcRationalFloorCeilTruncate < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
4
4
|
def setup
|
5
5
|
@a = GMP::Q.new(200,11)
|
6
6
|
@b = -@a
|
7
7
|
@c = GMP::Q.new(70,10)
|
8
8
|
end
|
9
|
-
|
9
|
+
|
10
10
|
def test_floor_ceil_truncate
|
11
11
|
assert_equal(@a.floor, 18, "GMP::Q should floor.")
|
12
12
|
assert_equal(@a.ceil, 19, "GMP::Q should ceil.")
|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
|
1
|
+
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
class TcRationalDenNum < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
4
|
+
def setup
|
5
|
+
@p = GMP::Q.new(22, 7)
|
6
|
+
@q = GMP::Q.new(-0.625)
|
7
|
+
end
|
8
|
+
|
9
|
+
def test_num
|
10
|
+
assert_equal(@p.num, 22, "GMP::Q#num returns the numerator")
|
11
|
+
assert_equal(@q.num, -5, "GMP::Q#num returns the numerator")
|
12
|
+
end
|
13
|
+
|
14
|
+
def test_den
|
15
|
+
assert_equal(@p.den, 7, "GMP::Q#den returns the denominator")
|
16
|
+
assert_equal(@q.den, 8, "GMP::Q#den returns the denominator")
|
17
|
+
end
|
18
|
+
end
|
data/test/tc_random.rb
CHANGED
data/test/tc_sgn_neg_abs.rb
CHANGED
data/test/tc_swap.rb
CHANGED
data/test/tc_z.rb
CHANGED
data/test/tc_z_addmul.rb
CHANGED
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
|
4
4
|
# Z op (Fixnum,Z), Z op (Fixnum,Fixnum), Z op (Fixnum,Bignum)
|
5
5
|
# Z op (Bignum,Z), Z op (Bignum,Bignum), Z op (Bignum,Fixnum)]
|
6
6
|
# Things are tested both ways because the implementation is asymetrical
|
7
|
-
class
|
7
|
+
class TcIntegerAddmul < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
8
8
|
def setup
|
9
9
|
@_64bit = 1_000_000_000_000.is_a? Fixnum
|
10
10
|
end
|
data/test/tc_z_basic.rb
CHANGED
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
|
2
2
|
|
3
3
|
# Tested: [Z op Z, Z op FixNum, Z op BigNum, FixNum op Z, BigNum op Z]
|
4
4
|
# Things are tested both ways because the implementation is asymetrical
|
5
|
-
class
|
5
|
+
class TcIntegerBasic < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
6
6
|
def setup
|
7
7
|
@a=GMP::Z.new(100)
|
8
8
|
@b=GMP::Z.new(200)
|
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ class TC_Z_Basic < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
|
27
27
|
|
28
28
|
def test_mul
|
29
29
|
assert_equal(@a * @b, 100 * 200, "GMP::Z should multiply correctly")
|
30
|
-
assert_equal(@a *
|
30
|
+
assert_equal(@a * 2, 100 * 2, "GMP::Z should multiply correctly")
|
31
|
+
assert_equal(@a * -2, 100 * -2, "GMP::Z should multiply correctly")
|
31
32
|
assert_equal(@a * @c, 100 * 2**32, "GMP::Z should multiply correctly")
|
32
33
|
assert_equal( 2 * @a, 2 * 100, "GMP::Z should multiply correctly")
|
33
34
|
assert_equal(@c * @a, 2**32 * 100, "GMP::Z should multiply correctly")
|
data/test/tc_z_exponentiation.rb
CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
1
1
|
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
2
|
|
3
|
-
class
|
3
|
+
class TcIntegerExponentiation < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
4
4
|
def setup
|
5
5
|
@a = GMP::Z.new(100)
|
6
6
|
@b = GMP::Z.new(16)
|
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ class TC_Z_Exponentiation < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
|
14
14
|
end
|
15
15
|
|
16
16
|
def test_powmod
|
17
|
-
assert_equal(GMP::Z(16), @a.powmod(2,256), "
|
18
|
-
assert_equal(GMP::Z(76), @b.powmod(10,@a), "
|
19
|
-
assert_equal(GMP::Z(0), @a.powmod(@b,256), "
|
20
|
-
assert_equal(GMP::Z(0), @a.powmod(@b,@c), "
|
17
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Z(16), @a.powmod(2,256), "GMP::Z#powmod((b : Fixnum), (c : Fixnum)) should work correctly")
|
18
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Z(76), @b.powmod(10,@a), "GMP::Z#powmod((b : Fixnum), (c : GMP::Z)) should work correctly")
|
19
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Z(0), @a.powmod(@b,256), "GMP::Z#powmod((b : GMP::Z), (c : Fixnum)) should work correctly")
|
20
|
+
assert_equal(GMP::Z(0), @a.powmod(@b,@c), "GMP::Z#powmod((b : GMP::Z), (c : GMP::Z)) should work correctly")
|
21
21
|
end
|
22
22
|
end
|
data/test/tc_z_export_import.rb
CHANGED
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
|
|
1
1
|
require File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper'))
|
2
2
|
|
3
|
-
class
|
3
|
+
class TcIntegerFunctionalMappings < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
4
4
|
def setup
|
5
5
|
@_64bit = 1_000_000_000_000.is_a? Fixnum
|
6
6
|
@xp1 = 7
|
7
|
-
@xp2 = 2**30 -1
|
7
|
+
@xp2 = 2**30 - 1
|
8
8
|
@xn1 = -5
|
9
9
|
@b1 = 2**70
|
10
10
|
# TODO: Add edge cases along Fixnum/Bignum border!!
|
data/test/tc_z_gcd_lcm_invert.rb
CHANGED
data/test/tc_z_hamdist.rb
CHANGED
data/test/tc_z_io.rb
CHANGED
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ if (RUBY_DESCRIPTION =~ /rubinius/i and RUBY_VERSION =~ /^1.8/) ||
|
|
5
5
|
(RUBY_DESCRIPTION =~ /jruby/i)
|
6
6
|
# Sorry charlie
|
7
7
|
else
|
8
|
-
|
8
|
+
|
9
|
+
class TcIntegerIo < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
9
10
|
def setup
|
10
11
|
@two_pow_100 = GMP::Z.pow(GMP::Z(2), 100)
|
11
12
|
@three_pow_100 = GMP::Z.pow(GMP::Z(3), 100)
|
data/test/tc_z_jac_leg_rem.rb
CHANGED